Видео

It’ll suck. Give up on paying for Bethesda games. Let them go bankrupt. Starfield’s and Fallout 4’s performance on consoles (the lowest common denominator of platforms they are available to be played on) show they don’t know how to make functional games for the price tag being asked

"Back to their roots" Most of the time, these studios dont even fucking know what those roots are

2032-2034

A small (relatively speaking) hand crafted World, more dynamic animations, and personally I want them to go back to every npc having a name, home, and daily routine.

fun fact :kobyla means female of horse

I agree with you.This is a huge slap in the face to us hardcore Arkham fan's and and a lot of people don't seem to understand that it seem's.

How does nobody understand that this was her best Joke? As in her killing Batman was a huge Joke Big time even my frist play threw i Caught on to that. They were all clone's anyway expect Wonder woman witch sucks.

and now KCD2 is coming out, and I'm feeling quite hungry again

There's no way this game deserves a 10/10. It's okay to like this game a lot, but there are things about this game that are objectively bad, like the bugs and clunky controls.

having my first experience of this game, very immersed! 77% render helped me bump up the graphics , and its a good one to sit back with the XBox controller for.

I'm one of those fool who will buy TES6 regardless. But man will it be really disappoint if they barely innovate and improve.

oh, come on! What's great in Morrowind isn't because of Howard. Morrowind excels in storybuilding and worldbuilding (not to be confused with design). But that's on other people, not him.

I honestly hope the leadership watched this video and think really hard about their choices.

Starfield permanently broke me from ever buying a game on its release date again. Since then, I watch online play for a couple of months before I decide to buy.

Spoiler - Yup. Massively.

Bro no game has hooked me in this hard. I hope this studio thrives ans we get a kcd 3 or whatever they want to call it just give us something more replayable like skyrim/etc maybe a bit less curated

Unfortunately, these corpos will grind this once good game development company into dust due to their own incompetence and arrogance.

1000%

The Elder Scrolls 6 = starfield graphics + elder scrolls online combat ,why make anything new if you have something that "just works"

The Elder Scrolls 6 = starfield graphics + elder scrolls online combat ,why make anything new if you have something that "just works"

If I'm being honest, it almost feels like bethesda is going through a bit of an identity crisis? They can't decide if they want to make a good action-adventure game or a good rpg, so they end up making mediocre slop trying to satisfy both crowds. The only people really succeeding at Bethesda seems to be the world design team, and they didn't really get to flex their stuff for starfield on account of the randomly generated landscapes. Everyone else seems to be kind of floundering. I'm not against BGS changing their genre, only failing at sticking to a theme. Arena and daggerfall were something akin to life simulators with a campaign loosely attached to them, a true adaptation of the tabletop role playing experience with the computer as the GM. Morrowind was something akin to an immersive sim, with the player being tasked with integrating themselves into a foreign culture and tackling a crisis embroiling vvardenfell. Oblivion was kind of a departure. The dungeon design and combat would seem to indicate Bethesda wanted to put a bigger focus into the action and dungeon crawling part of their formula this time around, but they kind of failed at stitching the non-linear open world and the linear dungeons together. Skyrim favored the action part even more than Oblivion, getting rid of even more role-playing avenues and focusing more on the action experience. The world is beautiful and the dungeons are... okay? but the story feels confused. It's a linear story with a constant sense of urgency, and yet there's a beautiful world the player is equally expected and not expected to explore. Meanwhile, in Morrowind, part of the story IS exploring the world, joining factions, learning new spells, improving your skills, getting new equipment, getting stronger. There are clearly gated points where you're told to put the main plot down to get stronger, get more experience, get some new gear. Morrowind feels like it was purpose built as an open world action rpg, whereas oblivion onwards kind of feel like the open world part is being included because it's expected. If Bethesda wants to succeed, they are going to need to finally pick a lane. Either make a linear branching story with linear level and world design to go along with it, or they're going to need to make a story with exploring the open world as a core design principle. And maybe fire Emil while they're at it. He seems to be pretty okay at making individual questlines, but his leadership of the creative team has resulted in confused, mediocre design. Get someone in who actually uses a single, discrete game design document for all the departments to center their goals around, and Bethesda will be ready to give this whole TES VI thing a real chance of success. I think, whatever ends up happening, I'll still play TES VI, but whether or not I pay full price or wait for sales will be predicated on whether or not they finally pick a definite lane for their games to occupy.

Will Bethesda ruin...? Yes, I just spared 14 mins of your life, your welcome! :)

Try gothic games,or gothic remake😎👊

Will it completely fail like Star Wars Outlaws in terms of sales? No Will it hit the sales targets that were likely discussed in the EA/Bioware boardroom when they were green lighting the project at its outset? No chance.

yes it will fail

TES6 will be like Starfield but worse. It's insane to wait 13 years+ for a TES sequel.

It's not gpnna fail, it's just gonna be a lot more like fallout 4 than anyone ever expected or wanted.............. Shit

Bethesda can say I am wrong, but I am still not buying the DLC. First, they need to do something about the preposterous repetitiveness of the base game.

Lets see how their modern audience bring money to their game

Bethesda might as well make it lousy, because there's no way I'm buying an Xbox just to play one game.

How was that conversation different then any of the elder scrolls games?

Bethesda needs to be Ubisofted.

They should just release another version of Skyrim. Maybe on mobile. 😂😂😂

Try NMS

Well. I think Bethesda is wrong. So there.

Who cares about surgery too scars? Character creators have always allowed scars. Some even allow you to modify how much tits bounce. But too scars are a deal breaker?

Big is NOT better, quality immersion is .! Starfield has planet to atmosphere to space gameplay , just loading screens and a woke agenda driven by constellation. I have no doubt the Dark Brotherhood questline in ES6 will be saturated down to an soft argument with a fairy god mother . Fallout 6 will be be about a UN mandated french crossdresser tip toeing through the rainbow tulips . Let the player friggen decide what is their moral obligations are and play how THEY want to play, instead of being railroaded by the useless woke nutjobs you've hired.

Player numbers do not lie: Today's SteamDB data: Fallout 4 -> 14,923; Skyrim SE -> 23,165; Starfield -> 9,130. Basically, it's back to pre-DLC levels.

Absolutely agree 👍🏼 Modern BioWare made some mind boggling changes and decisions that I just can’t get behind, especially after BG3. With each new game they reduce the RPG element for the sake of Modern Audience. Where are the skills? Persuasions? Herbalism? Survival etc..? You can’t even make Evil/Grey decisions or learn Blood Magic like in Origins because they don’t befit a Hero. F*^%k that, this ain’t RPG if you remove the R.

I fully expect Bethesda to quietly abandon Starfield and put all their resources into Fallout, since 76 has a much larger player base and the (abysmal) Prime show just won an Emmy for something. Bethesda's only functional IP is Fallout, and it's holding on by Protectron finger.

Bethesda thinks we are wrong??? Well, I am now a middle aged man. When I was a child, there was a saying "customer is always right".

Oh Bethesda thinks we are wrong. Guess its time to wrap it up guys, lets all go out and buy their game

I have played all of them loved each of them but this! this!!! is not a game I would ever play in this genre the first FABLE game I will not play... I mean dragon age looks to much like fable but at least fable is a game that takes the piss out of it self on purpose.

Why the fukk do people not call this shit out for what it is: TONE POLICING!?!... Tone policing is when you take an argument that was made angrily and make it all about it not being sent politely instead of addressing the argument. Toxic positivity is just a form of this where it has become so constant that nobody notices anymore. Hey, Emil Pissface, answer the following without moaning about it being "toxic", impolite, or "hating" -- 1) Why do you tell people not to bother writing good stories because the player will just tear them up and make paper planes out of them? 2) Would their doing so not indicate that you have, in reality, not written a good story that engages them enough to make them want to participate in it? 3) Have you ever written a good story? As in one that would get past the first round of the process of publication? 4) Why do you believe that you can tell players what they are or are not allowed to do with your story? 5) Did you not notice that Fallout: New Vegas allowed the player to kill almost every living thing in the game regardless of how it affected the story and at the same time managed to make it possible to complete the story in spite of this? 6) Did it ever occur to you that players might want to make deeper choices concerning the scenario in Fallout 4? Such as seizing all of the Brotherhood Of Steel's or Institute's assets? 6b) Did it ever occur to you that a veteran or a lawyer might be ashamed of their son if their son did the things Shaun has done, and did it ever cross your mind to make the expression of that an option? 7) Can you describe any of your characters without saying what they look like, what they wear, or what they do in the story? 8) Describe the logical thought process of characters who make certain decisions affecting the setting of the game. For example, why would anyone seeking genetically "pure" samples of Humanity only take one person out of the vault? 9) Do you seriously expect me to believe that no work would be done to clean the worst radioactive material out of Boston over two hundred years, or that the site on which a nuclear missile hit would still look like that? (Look at images of Chernobyl *today* ... notice that nuclear power plant meltdowns are a lot worse in the long term than nuclear bombings, and a person other than you can see the storytelling problem here.) 10) Piss off. If you want to be asked things nicely, Emil Pathetic, you best be nice to the people asking them. Throwing things back at them and moaning at them that they should be nice is, hilariously, toxic.

If youre gonna use "we got company" as a milennial line, maybe only use millenial movies

It doesn't matter what people say about it, all that matters is did they pay for it? Yes, they paid for it, AGAIN, guaranteeing the same quality in the future... Which they will also complain about, pay for and then complain about again. It's like voters complaining about the politicians which they will not stop electing.

If anyone thinks this is going to do well then I gotta say you’re a special one.

I'd argue their reputation was going down before Andromeda at least for me. Mass Effect 3 ending was massive L for them and also I couldn't stand Dragon Age 2 and Inquisition. So I think the rot set in a long long time ago.

7:11 well the player count and sales figures seem to indicate that 26% approval ratings are not turning into money 😊

0:19 the player count and sales figures don’t seem to be supporting his opinion 😊