Alex Murdaugh’s Lawyer Grills Expert Who Refuted Two Shooters Theory
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 фев 2023
- Alex Murdaugh’s attorney, Jim Griffin, cross-examined the state’s last key witness about his expert opinion on the defense’s theory that two shorter shooters could have been involved in the murders of Maggie and Paul. Dr. Kenneth Kinsey, a crime scene investigator, stood firm in his testimony and offered additional explanations as to why he believes the theory is not sound.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #LawandCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
This should be titled "Expert grills defense". Excellent witness. A Gentleman.
But he didn’t ask any questions to the defense so how could he grill them? Grilled means to ask or interrogate someone.
😂😂😂
This man is very intelligent! They thought they could bully him, but you can't bully someone who tells the truth.
Amen!
What? What did I miss ?
💥 boom! Agreed!
@@creaturecaught4amtapedlive17 whats wrong with you?
@@stacer1962 are we watching the same thing?? .............. WHAT??!!
The more the defense questions him the more clearly he explains for the prosecution. This art in motion.
Agreed
I disagree, but ultimately his errors were harmless as the defense didn't properly cross him. Missed opportunity to tie this guy up.
@@andreichira7518 Tie up the truth? Hard to do.
This was the only witness imo that helped the prosecution. The prosecution imo royally messed this case.
🤡🤡
This is my favorite expert. He also has a good sense of humor. And he doesn't get mixed up which is what the defense was trying to get him to do.
Except with “urinalysis” and “your analysis”.
@@gramateur5776 I agree! Also, have you noticed a lot of the expert witnesses taking things 100% literally? That's a good witness, they don't get tripped up by a sneaky defense attorney!
He is a turkey.
Humour is often used to be liked. His humour is out of place and not of the cuff.
many of the witnesses knew what the defense was trying to do.
"That's the way angles work sir". Totally. He is solid.
and scientifically correct, without wavering according to his found facts.
The witness was composed and professional. He knows his stuff with confidence.
So who is paying this jerk?
Seems like a sweet ole country boy
@@briannadaylon90 q
Dr Kinsey is intelligent well spoken
Indeed
Dr. Kenneth Kinsey is probably the most competent witness of all the witnesses in this trial. He didn't waiver in any way. His testimony was precise, technical and logical.
Including the part where he was saying that because the scene was dynamic, math doesn't apply?
He stuck to the fact as he knew it. I believe that is how truth usually works 😉
@@andreichira7518 I think that what he was saying is that math could be used if the scene was static but because it was dynamic with infinite variables, it couldn’t be used to calculate precise angles.
@@mango8918 Except we know that's not true. The path of travel of a bullet if you have two impact points is a line. Are we to believe you can't plot a line of you have two points because Kinsey says it's a "dynamic environment"? Please.
@@andreichira7518 I don't know if you wish to make this into an argument but, if you go to the video starting at 4:50, Dr. Kinsey explains it very well. He is talking about math (geometry) and the infinite variables that exist when trying to calculate the path of a bullet or shotgun shell. There were many moving parts which makes it impossible to calculate every possibility of where the shooter (Alex) was and where the victim (Paul) was. In general, there are enough facts to know where Paul was and where Alex was when he shot him. If everything is static, then an accurate outcome is predictable or known. I don't know what you may believe or disagree with that makes it difficult to understand or not true.
I wonder if Alex wants to stand up and say, "No, no, that's not how it happened at all," or if he's like, "Wow, he's spot on."
Agree 👍
He knows better though. I was hoping he’d crack up like on Perry Mason when the pathologist testified about Paul’s wounds.
Watching him I have often thought this as well!! I wonder how many times he’s thought “nope, that’s not how I did that”.
😅 I was thinking exactly the same thing! Would certainly save the taxpayers' money 🤦🏽♀️
I say that all the time! In fact I was thinking we should have passed out rubber bracelets for the trial. “JAA” - JUST ASK ALEC.
Dr. Kinsey's testimony will win the day and hopefully the conviction.
🤞
The title makes me wonder whether you guys watched his testimony… This expert was as professional and knowledgable as it gets. It was the defense who got grilled and it was beautifully done!
Yeah, defense definitely dropped the ball. They could have really pulled this guy apart and Griffin just didn't pull it off at all.
Yes...Griffin got schooled........
Disagree. Prosecution's "experts" are the worst
@@demurred314 I ain't got a dog in this fight, but you are 110% correct.
I feel the title could be right. The energy was Griffin trying to grill him and get anything out of him to fit their agenda however he just kept getting schooled and just looked like a silly goose most the time while trying so hard lol
I absolutely love this witness. He did not let defense wear him down or beat him up or twist his words to fit their narrative.
"grilled" lmao I think it was the other way around. HE destroyed the defense and definitely made a good impression on the jury.
best of all, he was funny!
Grill
past tense: grilled; past participle: grilled
1.
cook (something) using a grill.
"grill the trout for about five minutes"
2.
INFORMAL
subject (someone) to intense questioning or interrogation.
"my father grilled us about what we had been doing"
@@jetais1 I know I could watch him all day!!!
Please
This witness made the defense look like buffoons.
😄😄😄
.......and Im sure those bafoons know who the murderer is
Totally
Bustedddddd!!!! LOVE the gentleman being questioned!
Absolutely from beginning to end superb🥳🥳🥳🥳
💪🏽
This guy is a great witness. And 100$ an hour is extremely reasonable.
I wonder what Alex’s retainer or hourly rate was or what his current attorneys charge.
My plumber charges me $103/hr. . . This guy is undervaluing his expertise. Maybe the publicity will result in a more generous fee schedule for him
I don't know why attorneys from either side try to make a big deal out of expert witnesses charging for their time. A small minority are hacks/grifters but the majority are dedicated to the task to which they've been assigned.
Their expert was getting 600$ an hour
Exactly. I live in California and the mechanic pay rate is way over the amount this guy is charging.
THIS GUY ROASTED THE DEFENCE LAWYER
I enjoy listening to Dr Kinsey. He is a well educated and experienced CSI. He is straightforward and precise with his testimony.
Dr. Kinsey stole my heart. I understand why the jurors hugged and thanked him afterwards. He was incredibly articulate and confident in his testimony and has a big heart!
When did the jury hugged and thanked him?
They hugged him? So bizarre should not be allowed
Dr. Kinsey's use of science and logic effectively refutes the defense's theory. The defense is twisting the facts to suit their theory instead of their theory to suit the facts.
Yes Dr Kinsey did effectively refute the DEFENCE’S theory
@@ShotskysRingandThings Defence and defense are both correct ways to spell the same word.
I didn't realize it before but the defense is allowed to lie, make up stuff and ignore fact's. The prosecution is not allowed to do none of that. Emily D Baker informed us about that. I was amazed by that fact.
Their job is to create reasonable doubt. Thats what they are supposed to do.
He has just the right combination of book smarts and common knowledge to fight off any slimy attorney.
He is just wonderful. He is the greatest defense in the prosecution couldn’t have picked a better witness.
This guy is a phenomenal witness. He is a genius
Wow
He was absolutely THE BEST WITNESS
"How did the pellet get there? (exactly where his theory would put it)" "it's.....(turns in disbelief to check they're talking about the same thing)....REALLY?" The defence lawyer should have walked after that 🤣
You can see how nervous Alex is getting, reaching for his water
Really nervous now! Buuuussted!
The shooter was in the cart. The one he drove down there. It doesn't take a fool to know that
I believe that is the consensus.
Right!!! I totally agree
I agree and being the height we know he is sitting on the cart would put him around 5'2-5'4 inches or no?
@@courtgood52588 most of these educated fool's are not street smart. It's simple.
The defense attorney is trying to trip up this expert which he'll never do because the expert knows exactly what he's talking about and he's not fabricating something out of nothing like the defense has attempted to do...
exactly. the expert works in this field and knows everything, he is brilliant, while the defense has no clue what they are talking about. they completely f up this part, I see almost no preparation whatsoever
He don’t have any reason to lie unlike the defendant
1. The defense attorney didn't have to trip him up.
2. He did lie.
"I counted 150 or so pellets several times and kept messing up, so I just agreed with the literature."
10 seconds later: "I seen the x-rays, I didn't sit and count the pellets in Paul, but I'll take the pathologists word for it."
How did he count the pellets several times and get close to 150 if he didn't bother counting the pellets on the x-rays?
He lied. That simple. It's fine though.
We all know that most of the public is biased against AM.
@@d-con6825 why don't you just confess to the murders then, and then AM can be released...lol
@@karaDee2363 I, myself, think everyone deserves a fair shot...
There was some pretty damning circumstantial evidence, but it doesn't prove, without a doubt, that he done it.
A lawyer with 35 years of experience knows to use two guns to throw off suspicion of him. He planned this out acting as if it were two people instead of one ( him ). Remember the boat incident with two drivers... he knows what he's doing...
Exactly
You are 100% correct.. it almost makes it more obvious AM is guilty!! You gotta be extremely gullible to think he didn’t do it. And As for people talking about motive.. 😂 there’s more motives in this case than I’ve ever seen before 🤷♂️
Spot on, totally agree! I believe he knew well enough to throw everyone off enough to make it look like there were 2 shooters. I think he thought using different guns would throw them off track. I believe that was the plan all along.
Very cunning indeed
Great point.
29:46 "would you agree Paul got caught by surprise?" Yes, that'd it count for his arms being down; OR someone he was real comfortable with"...
Such a savage line from him and very true
Reasonable doubt is what I heard.
@@zenithrepublic1081 you must not understand what reasonable doubt is…lol.
@@WideAwakeHuman it’s reasonable that he was caught off guard with hands down
“Caught by surprise” I should say
Dr. Kinsey wins the day and overall testimony...hands down the best witness to take the stand, IMO
I dont believe strangers would not bring their own guns to gun fight. The family guns were used!
Exactly 💯
Did they prove guns belong to family
@@barbaranoel3186They said the .300 Blackout shells found by Maggies body were the same brand found in the magazine of a rifle that is owned by Murdaugh that is also chambered in .300 Blackout
@@barbaranoel3186 yes
Yes but the gun smith said he sells a lot of the blackout shell's?
I have so much respect for his professionalism and level of expertise and knowledge with confidence 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Defense attorney Griffin got a spanking! Dr. Kinsey is the GOAT. Adept, precise, highly competent.
A I don’t think so
Dr.Kinsey was the best witness I have heard in this trial , honest , professional, and very knowledgeable with all the questions he was asked by the defense Lawyer Mr.Griffin.
However I found it that the defense were drawing at straws , because they were trying really hard to try to change his answers , but he was not giving in.
And by asking how much he was getting paid it was a real cheap shot , I was very surprised how little he was charging compared to the other experts they had on .
He did an amazing job too bad the defense didn’t do a better job on their part.
Good point... you probably only needed an assault rifle to kill two people in close proximity... but this may have been a deception strategy that the shooter employed, by using two different types of weapons, to cast a suspicion of two shooters
I think they were in the feed room, Alex found them and used the shotgun first, but it only had to shells so he switched to the Blackout 300.
Don't rule out hired killers.
@@TedATL1 If by hired killers you mean hired by Alex, I don't think he would have put himself anywhere near that place for anytime they were there he would've been as far away as logically possible and if you mean by somebody else well then for what reason? These people aren't rich like the Murdochs they didn't even get any money from the lawsuit against their son they just had no means really to hire someone in my opinion
If Alex hired killers then he wouldn't have had to go back and retrace his steps and talk to everyone confirming their stories he would have made sure he was seen and heard exactly the same time they were being killed in my opinion
Well established there many guns around. It was a hunting property. Once you decide to kill, easier to use two guns than to reload shotgun. Had Paul hemmed up in feed room. Can’t miss but then you switch rather than fumbling around with reloading.
Dr. Kinsey CANNOT be swayed, nor confused. But Griffin looks quite confused.
He was very professional. He was able to explain everything so that it made sense.
AM gave him the death stare when he said Paul was killed by someone he knew. Same state he gave CW when he asked him if he was a family annihilator.
I could hear this guy all day he will not give up
I thought i was the only one to feel this way. He was the only witness I didn't want to stop.
After the aggression shown by the defense early in the day, it was great to see him come back and shut them down.. it was satisfying to watch 😂
Dr. Kinsey is excellent at what he does plus his firearms knowledge is an added bonus.
Science meets country! Refreshing insight.
Confident!
I bet he has his own theories on what happened….
Dr Kinsey is highly under paid for his expert testimony.
fully agree
He's a good man
Don’t cry Alex it’s not time the jury just heard
about the theatrical emotional you could bring on in the drop of a pin. The Defense is showing some anger that they are not getting the right answers. The last witness was so good and so honest.
Give him life imprisonment anyway, regardless of the verdict, he deserves it.
Agree
Defense
@@gramateur5776 really your going to correct my spelling 😳 I’m guessing the auto correction didn’t fix wow
@@doreenmills4487 I presume that you’re British and your spelling is equally correct. Apologies for my fellow Americans acting provincial *yet again*
this witness was excellent and unmoved by the bully of defense lawyer... he was a good ole boy and not one bit shook
A good old boy with PhD in Criminal Justice.
@@linnonebunch4957 exactly Linn. This was by far the best witness of the day
He’s asking this witness how much he’s being paid yet they paid their guy over $13k to come and testify??? 🙄 AM is guilty. Period.
He didn't get very far with the attempted insult of getting paid. Cut him short on every subject. Honest, professional, no bs expert witness. Defense didn't stand a chance, lol.
How do you know it looks like it’s going to get tried again lol
29:26 This witness testimony was great from start to finish but this was my favorite part. "or someone he was real comfortable with"
🎩 off to this guy !
The look at that 'INNOCENT' man's face when he said that. Priceless
Right! Noticed that, too.
He had to say that
29:48 this side eye from AM reeks of contempt for this witness. He absolutely knows this man has a strong case for his scenario and he’s going to need a new excuse or confession soon.
God bless this witness. He presented well on the stand. Extremely knowledgeable in his testimony and area of expertise. I believe he cleared up any doubt the jury may have had with the defense's theory of 2 shooters.
I thought he was a totally rude and disrespectful witness. Laughing and giggling throughout, and at extremely inappropriate times, like while explaining about Paul’s murder, and how his skull, brain and bodily tissue had flown up to ceiling and obviously back down.
He also wasn’t 100% competent. He didn’t see that slug in the doorway. That was extremely easy to see, especially when he’s gone to the scene to reenact the crime, or to verify what exactly happened. Yes no, I didn’t think he was that great at all
Dr.Kinsey is underpaid compared to the other expert witness. His testimony and expert views are solid, reliable and believable.
I friggin love Dr.Kinsey.
Why?
These lawyers are painful to watch. How aggravating.... send in the clowns 🤡
Which lawyers are you referring to? I can't stand the defense lawyers
Introducing the defense expert fees on redirect was an excellent tactical move.
At times Alex looks at the witness with rage and he wants to kill him
'Where's ma side b'side & ma guns?'
@@kerri-lynbryant293 😂🤣
Defense lost some points when he asked him about his retainer.. $100.00 p/h for an expert is NOTHING! Shot himself in the foot, no pun intended (defense attorney.) Plus the expert has a good rapport with the jury -- that only helps the Pros. more...
Plus attorneys can charge $200 - $600/hr
I understand why he did it, but honestly that was the least of the problems with this cross.rebuttal.
It really didn't help discredit him. It was not nearly that much money spent compared to most experts.
It would have been so tempting to ask "and what are you being paid for your work, Mr Griffin?" 🤡
Yes. DEFENCE did lose some points. Haha. No pun intended. (DEFENCE attorney)
I love this guy .
" I'm a Baptist and if I didnt charge anything, my friends and family would talk bad about ne".
Typical baptist lol
someone said Kinsey is the cutest thing to come out of the South since Leslie Jordan 😂😂😂 I could listen to him talk for dayssssss
Me looking up L Jordan 😎
@@Diaz.et.Pam. please let me know when you do 😂😂😂 RIP Leslie
@@sashek8451 🤣🤣🤣dead! Pun intended
1 ) His wife was going to divorce him, he would lose (money) in a
settlement.
2 ) His son had a possible financially devastating law suit coming up
that could cost 30-40 million USD. He loves money more than his
family. Add all of the other financial thefts and deception, led him
to make a fatal choice regarding his wife and son, they had become
dispensable liabilities. Sad choice.
3 ) His wife and son confronted / maybe threatened him about “the
pills”. Overall, his life was imploding and he lashed out.
All excellent motives
Exactly. I’d like to add that he probably told his wife to deal with Paul and his troubles through the years. He probably felt that she didn’t do the job she was supposed to. She stayed home to raise the children and he probably blames her for it, so she was punished with Paul. My 2 cents anyway!
How do you know?
If stares could kill.... That witness would be gone! AM is seething and it gives testimony of guilt to see him squirm
Griffin is ignoring the fact that there are cases where killers use multiple weapons to try to confuse the investigators and make them think that there is more than one shooter. Also, someone going to kill multiple people might want a second gun in case the first one jams. Finally, who else knew that Maggie and Paul were not only at Mozelle, but at the kennels, and then who lied about being at the kennels until he couldn't. Maggie doesn't make sense as a target for revenge, and it was two years after the boating accident. If anything, Alex would have been the target. He tried to frame Connor Cook and cheated vulnerable people out of money. Why would shooters not go to the house first, as Alex was the only one known to stay there regularly? He's the only one they know would likely be there.
Exactly my thoughts!
Lights were on in the kennels. The boat case was still pending and settled in January 2023. Sorry to poke holes in your argument. Paul was the target; Maggie was inconvenient and unfortunate bystander.
@@bjalexandria1 No Maggie was not a "bystander" -- don't forget -- AM called HER to come and she was wondering what he was up to!
I love this guy. He knows his stuff and they couldn't rattle him.
I mean the guy busts himself when he says he didn’t want to go down there but changed his mind. The reality is he lagged behind on purpose to grab the guns and ready them. They would have been very suspicious if he was bringing guns before that.
I agree!
this shows Alex is extremely tense, uncomfortable, worried and what placement of shooter is worrying him!
More like Dr. Kinsey grilled the Defense.
It was more like Dr Kinsey grilled the DEFENCE.
@@ShotskysRingandThings yup
It’s crazy that an experienced attorney murdered his wife and son and THEN
1. Thought deleting text messages from his phone made them impossible to find by law enforcement
2. Didn’t realize his Suburban recorded everything he did
3. Lied about things there was no way he could back up
4. Hired lawyers that seem totally incompetent and stumbled thru cross examinations
Oh i think the M family has run the area for years and years. He assumed he would never get caught stealing all that money and I also feel like he never thought he would have a family suing him for the death of their daughter. I would highly believe that when they found all that money missing, M just assumed he could skate again out of the situation.
but that’s assuming he was even a competent attorney. I know a lot of doctors with medical degrees but couldn’t find their own buttholes if someone didn’t show em where it is
Tinsley said he was the attorney for about half the cases in the county and that's why he was certain that he had plenty of money besides what he had stolen.
he's not the brightest candle in the box
But if you’re angry, very, extremely angry, one loses control. I think there were words between AM and Maggie, maybe a heated argument. I also feel she was running towards AM and/of Paul. Out of protecting her young. That’s why this Doc kept saying they were moving, the shooter and the victims. AM was angry and became angrier as he engaged with Maggie. That’s my feelings.
Alex Murdoch is relieving what he did, every time they discribe the killing
Alex is sweating. he knows how it’s looking for him.
Go to jail,go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200.!
@@garthsprunger3060 should be the end result but without the guns and the clothes/shoes it’s probably going to result in a hung jury(knowing he did it and proving it without any doubt are two different things) we dang well he did it(imo he had help getting rid of clothes and I think bro knows a lot more than he says) andddd Alex’s former law partner should have been asked by state”what were you referring to when u testified that u saw a lot more that hasn’t been talked about here in court?” Elaborate….he gave them perfect opportunity to get more info out
@@angelagoff6810 yes a hung jury would be no surprise, but Imo either way,Alex will not be free. The wonderful gift of life that was givin , and decade's of corrupt was lived and passed down, this family now reaps what they sewed.sad results are many more innocent will suffer.
Absolutely that man knows what he's talking about!
The defense got SMOKED .
Love this witness! Extremely competent and well spoken. He’s very matter of fact and believable. I appreciate his personal efforts, time, and money he’s dedicated to getting Justice for Maggie, Paul, and all the other deaths around the Murdaughs
Well spoken? Everytime he said cement it sounded like he was saying semen.
@@harshmma1916 what YOU are referring to is his southern accent. What I am referring to is not the way he pronounces his words, but the actual content of his words.
@@jodiejo27 just a bit of humour 🤠 but not aimed more at the usa has a whole. Why do you guys put weird emphasis on certain parts of words its cement, not see meant. And vitamins are vitamins not vy ta mins. Your just an odd bunch
@@harshmma1916 the United States has many different dialects throughout the country. The south sounds different than the north and different from the west etc…we laugh at each other when we visit different areas and hear the different pronunciations of words. Odd? Yeah I would say that too
@@harshmma1916 bless your heart!
A well spoken, unflappable and highly credible witness.
agree
Seriously? Lol he's far to confident in his work when he flippently completed his shotty investigation.
@@simonsays...5061 I agree. Everyone liked him because he got the good old boy twang thing going. He got his doctorate in criminal Justice from Walden, which is a mail in university. He has the audacity to compare himself to forensic pathologists. All he needed to do was to spit some chew to complete the aww shucks bs. May not mean anything, but the jury probably likes him and will buy what he is selling.
@Rita Marie are you kidding me? You're shitting on this man's education? Go back and actually listen to his qualifications instead of making fun of his accent. Unreal. This man has a PHD and doctorate with 30 plus years in law enforcement and that's not all. Glad you aren't sitting in on this jury SMH
Just like you should.
The jury's trip to Mosell will backfire on Defense. The remote, isolated environment will highlight to impossibility of a stranger lurking close enough to kennels to kill those victims within the tight timeline. Plus the dogs would have alerted family to the presence of an intruder in the woods or within the adjacent buildings when they, the dogs, were running all over the place chasing chickens just minutes before the murders.
My exact thoughts!
The kennels are right by a public road.
You don't know what your currently guessing at. Dogs just are not predictable except for taking a pee or chasing moving things with potential intrusion to their vicinity of eating and sleeping. Had the dogs been out in a field that would be different about noticing intruders like humans ...
At the least any arranged killing out there is deliberately targeting thoes residents.. from the absence of the dogs busting anyones hide , the key to success in this potentially planned crime is something about making it look like this was Alex , so much of the highlights of suspicion are complex behaviour ability to mimic or disguise a crime within.. so something like people who have been accessing the property with consent ( hypothetically a worker like a gardener being recruited by a person or persons getting this crime organised, inside knowledge) Friends decisive trickery is clearly what that group of people are all like , steeling from each other all over the place, bank assisted.. having a friend turn enemy loitering around to make the most excruciating possible retaliation by killing family, leaving an orphan essentially once n Buster and torturing Alex with imprisonment and misplaced guilty association... The elder murdaugha put many many people to death , not all of them were safe bets - aggressive behaviour retaliation reactive to something old handsome did is not off these matters with the old guy possibly the other target that night but he went back into hospital and died in the days following.. to imagine the amount of cases where the solicitor was able to take the defendant to the cleaners and the rage in families feeling this is honour to retaliate for ..as the chips were down to kick in deeper making dust from damaged goods is just fine float away longer sticking mud in wait.. haste is something like getting mud in one's face ... Alex caused something but not sure we know what that is
@@ZootZinBootZ wasn’t one of the dogs out to get the chicken?
Yes it will backfire on the DEFENCE.
This is the most gruesome description of victims injuries EVER!
You must be new
And Griffin and Harpootlian seem to enjoy describing it all to the full. I'm sure much of that is to get Alex blubbering yet again, all for the jury!!
@@Leaveit_alone 🙄
Head down, starts the nodding 🙄
Ghouls on the defense side.
So glad he countered University of New Haven expert. He’s a much better witness. Just better at explaining everything
23:48 "there's a shooter somewhere" Thank you Mr. Griffin, and he is within the room!
And the prosecution is spanking the defense! This is what I have been waiting for. For them to actually do what they needed to do! Great expert!
Great witness. Likable but still no nonsense and confident. I love how he pushes back against Griffin while also making the science easy to follow- the exact opposite the defense's forensic witness's have been. Very powerful testimony.
Precisely. No BS a cone- shape is a freaking cone shape. These defense lawyers are very square!
☝️ hold on a sec. Let me air shape it for you? 🙌🏼💢 oops, I am not the one testifying.
Thank you for keeping your composure Sir.
He was all nonsense laughing in court
AM is sitting there, all in his head regretting not the murders he committed, but rather the mistakes he made during the murders 😖
We’re you there?
O sorry I didn’t realize you were there that night
Could listen to Dr. Kinsley talk all day long. 😁. He's a ☆. ☺.
Not me you fell for him? That easy
When Alex becomes emotional he looks like he is very sorry and angry at himself for something.
Sorry he got caught, hoping the jury believes the theatrics and lies.
it’s possible he was in the haze of being high or psychosis and now sober, realizing what he did
He certainly ain't sorry for any of his victims - clients, partners, family or friends.
AM is trying to provide a good performance…that’s all I will give him. AM is an expert at turning all that ON and quickly OFF.
Assuming how a person looks…means absolutely nothing ⚖️
This last witness destroyed the defense line, on the 2 midgets bs, he was so accurate and professional, and no nonsense. Loved him! And also very clear and descriptive. Good closing witness. There’s no shred of a doubt AM is guilty!
We’re you there?
The witness here definitely bolstered the prosecution’s case.
With guns that have nothing to do with the case
This witness is awesome, he knows his stuff. This attorney should sit down and shut up
I have spent way too much time reading and watching this case and I literally find it difficult to sleep due to the eeriness of it all. I can't even imagine how he can close his eyes and sleep after SEEING the aftermath and carnage of what he did to his wife and HIS SON! Not to discount Maggie because it is just awful, but it is absolutely inconceivable to think of HOW does a parent to kill their own child?
Best witness ever 👍🏻
It was at this moment, Alex knew his goose was cooked.
I can tell that the jury loved and trusted this guy
Ya I don’t know why
Using 2 different firearms makes perfect sense if the perpertrator was a single individual who wants to confuse the investigation.😕
Griffin his a CLOWN wow the more he pushed the better sounds for the state..... BIG L for the defense 🙄😒✌️Justice for Paul and Maggie 🙏🙌🙏🙌
You can just see the wheels turning in AM's head while these guys are discussing what happened and what COULD have happened.. AM looks like he knows exactly how it all happened and he's enjoying watching them speculate and argue it!
Exactly!👍
Agree 👍
I hope AM is pooping his pants abit…..
Look at the body language of AM and at certain times good ol’ daddy is nodding his head when they were talking about when the gun was fired..
Defense- " I object your honor. This witness is hostile towards our case."
What time stamp? Do you remember? I'd love to see that!
The jury was so impressed by this witness they asked to personally thank him after the trial!!
Why?
I just love Dr Kinsey!! He’s intelligent, excellent personality and demeanor, funny, polite, and really knows his weapons and crime scenes…best witness of the entire trial!
Witness very confident of his knowledge and thus his expertise. Defense lawyers and Murdaugh's face and looks not too happy with expert witness declarations. If looks could kill.
The defense attorney is helping the prosecutor with every question he asks the expert....
This guy was the star witness of this trial. Well him and Money Mark Tinsley!! He absolutely broke it all down brilliantly based on the FACTS. But also explained exactly how it's impossible to get accurate trajectory or "height of shooter" and totally blowing up that middle schooler assailant theory lol. Funny they question what he was getting paid and there experts were being paid double/ triple that to do exactly what they did and come up with some crazy implausible theory that they can try to somewhat make fit with the evidence and this man wasn't having any of that. Gotta love how Jim Griffen was bringing up stuff he knew nothing about and looked like a fool!
I loved that lawyer asking his boss to keep getting lower to the floor
😂😂😂😂😂
29:50 so sad…Paul, he was comfortable with the shooter or someone he knew😢
I can’t imagine sitting through this detail if it were my loved ones. It’d kill me.
Especially if you were the one that caused their wounds.
Yeah he's upset but no tears not even pretending he knows the gig is up
OMG he did it! He is not even interested to look and see how his son was killed, it shows that it was him.
If one of the shots came from 4 feet high, Alex likely took a knee to aim his shot. No big mystery, no 4 foot midget assassin.
Bingo, but defense wants ppl to believe the shooter was " Dopey" of the Seven Dwarfs... No buyer here and I seriously doubt the jury believes "Dopey did it"
Thank you Alex for making all of us view this information and testimony. Why not tell us all what happened?
I agree David. But he sits there and puts on a fake crying show for the jurors