Thanks again for the very detailed and informative review. You deserve many applause for your hard work. It is rare to see this level of testing on RUclips. Keep doing the great work.
6:48 - stabilization is a breaking point. When you traveling, you don't want to bring with you and set tripod for every shot. Thanks for confirming it for me one more time.
I've gone in three considerable directions in as many days on my next 24-70. I've been gut punched by the (mostly) negative reviews of the 24-70 ART and after finally accepting I went and ordered the Canon 24-70 II but had a change of heart due mostly to the price and now I'm almost completely sold on the Tamron. Many thanks Dustin!
Do you still have the Tamron 24-70 ? Are you liking it? I'm looking for an upper tier 24-70 2.8 as well and am considering it. Shooting on a Canon R10. I had theTamron Di VC USD 100-400mm f4-5 6.3 and could not get that thing to focus correctly. I tried it on DSLR and my R10, even with the tap in console trying to dial it in. After probably 400-600 shots, I finally threw in the towel. I know the 100-400 isn't the same focal length, but I'm talking Tamron in general. For this 24-70 2.8, I'm hoping for something really good more for the lower light indoor sports/family stuff. TIA for any insight you may have.
Thank you Dustin, for doing all of the hard work for me, and a much more through job I might add. I just bought the Tamron lens, and so far I like it. I always liked Tamron going back to the film days, but back then, they were not as comparable to the original manufacturers. The next series of yours that I need to study is the AFMA adjustments to see if I need to do this.
Great series of reviews Dustin - super useful. I`ve read so many speculative comments by people claiming the G1 and G2 are `optically identical` and the only difference is build quality. Your experience with the G1 and test results with two of the G2s shows this is not the case. Tamron is seriously upping their game . . .
Showing a lot of great pictures in a fast sequence. Unusual: A "gear reviewer" who actually can take great pictures, which of course gives your verdicts more weight...
One of the things holding me back from the tamron is Canon DPP, which is my backup raw photo editor if acdsee isn't sufficient or if I want to get the best possible result from Canon glass. I also have an 80D now and plan to move up to the 90D with low weight 'L' EF compatible glass for the next 5 years....been comparing this lens versus the Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS. The canon lens is slower but has a built in macro at 70mm. I assume also cheaper and less weight? That said, the f/4 is not the best on aps-c...
Greetings from Victoria Canada! I’m about to get this Tamron!! With you’re exceptional analysis and seamless dialogue; it solidified my decision to acquire one! Thanks Dustin! Top shelf channel!
I bought one of these used a few weeks ago and the AF made a TERRIBLE squeak when focusing to infinity, much to my disappointment. But I used it for a few days and loved it so much that I just bought a brand new one and it gets here Thursday. After some Google searches, however, I found that this seems to be a relatively common issue with this lens... so I'm hoping against hope that it doesn't become a problem. Also, that shot with the hands on the piano keys is absolutely amazing! Love it love it love it.
As for the weight issue, the 24-70mm G2 is even heavier than the original Tamron 24-70mm. My question is whether the 24-70mm G2 is as sharp as the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, which over its zoom range was objectively sharper than the original Tamron 24-70mm. While the Tamron 28-75mm lacks VC, it's only 510gm and currently retails for $400.
See for yourself. In full-frame tests, the only place where the 24-70mm is slightly sharper than the 28-75mm is in the far corners at f2.8. At f4-5.6, the 28-75mm is significantly sharper, particularly in the 28-50mm range. www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/tamron/24-70mm-f2.8-di-vc-usd-sp-model-a007/review/ www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/tamron/28-75mm-f2.8-xr-di-ld-aspherical-if-sp-af/review/
Dustin, I just finished watching all of your videos comparing these lenses, and I feel much more informed on the pros and cons of each option. Mainly I was focused on the differences between the Sigma and the Tamron G2 because they fit nicely within my budget. Much of my research left more questions than answers, but thanks to your in depth testing, I've decided to pull the trigger and try out the Tamron as an all around lens for my Nikon D750. I believe they will pair nicely and it will match my shooting style. Thank you for your high quality, unbiased outlook. You've helped me tremendously!
Thanks again for a very detailed review! Your photos at around the 1:30 mark look fantastic! Do you have a video talking about some of these beautiful photos you've taken (set-up, gear, advice, etc)?
+Andrew Jarman I have some segments called “what caught my eye” where I cover some of that. The difference in a lot of those photos is that they were ones I had processed, whereas most of the photos I share in reviews are pretty close to out of camera to show lens performance as opposed to showing of my processing techniques.
After several weeks of shooting assignments with my Tamron 24-70g2 I couldn't be more pleased. Thanks to the image stabilization I have already been able to grab several important images that never would have been possible with my older Canon lens. As Dustin has mentioned in his reviews, it is particularly sharp at the wider end vs. the telephoto portion field of view.There is one issue that I have noticed that bothers me. I feel that the lens hood doesn't provide enough protection against glare; I think it's a bit too short in length. I have gotten flare in a couple of backlight images where I thought the hood would have protected me. My old canon hood is physically bigger. I assume that Tamron sized it to fit the max field of view property, but it just doesn't seem right to me; it seems small. Has anyone else noticed this?
+John Halpern I’m assuming by “old Canon” you are referring to the 24-70L Mark I. It has a unique design where the hood can be very deep at times - the hood almost makes it function like an internally zooming lens, a bit. All newer designs from Canon, Tamron, and Sigma abandon that for a lens hood mounted on the front (like most lenses), so they all provide a roughly equal amount of shading. The new Tamron is actually at the front of the pack for flare resistance
Did you take all those pictures with the tamron G2 i wouldn't mind taking pictures like that. I love taking pictures but i want me a very good lens i don't want to spend that kind of money for the canon L series lenses. I want something with great pictures quality so you're recommending the tamron 24-70 vc g2 thanks Dustin
@@DustinAbbottTWI i definitely want to buy this lens. So please tell me this lens can fit on my canon 80d cause i definitely will go buy this same exact lens and start taking beautiful pictures like you did
Your concise and fair reviews is the reason I wait to purchase anything new until I have seen A DA review on it. Thank you for another fantastic review series Dustin.
Great review Dustin. As a wedding photographer I was slightly concerned by the amount of barrel distortion this lens may have shooting at 24mm. Would it really be an issue for wedding and portrait photography?
Greetings Dustin from Malaysia! I'm a Nikon user. Their previous non VR 24-70 was a legend. New VR version is great but sadly the price is exorbitant. I found this Tamron fits the bill as an alternative to Nikon's current version. Tamron has improved significantly, period. The price alone will shift Nikon and Canon shooters to it alone. Already, this lens is pin sharp in daylight shooting, better still when I attach my NiSi ND's on it. Think Tamron's 70-200 G2 will be equally good. Thank you for your comprehensive review of this Tamron 24-70 G2. You're a real pro Bro
i decided to go with the sony new (573.00 gray market) 16-50mm f2.8 ssm aps-c lens to replace my full frame sigma previous generation sigma 24-70mm f2.8 because the only other full frame A mount lense for my sony is the carl zeiss ssm11 at $2,100.00....hope it works!.....you sold me on the tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2 BUT tamron does not make this lens for my sony "A" mount!......... tamron lost a bunch of sales to sony "A" mount users....... I believe you are on the top of the food chain in what you do, light years ahead of the others in your presentations and your delivering of the factual information........i trust in your opinion and thats saying alot for me.....
@@DustinAbbottTWI because of your review, I bought a used lens for this Tamron. Not just this but also the Tamron 70-210 f4 although the latter does have the quirky defocus and refocus whenever you use the longer focal length and you shift focus from a near to far object. Unit already has the latest firmware but still happening. Nevertheless, was not a deal breaker for me as the quality of the lens was still great overall. No regrets.
Great review series Dustin!!! I just rented this lens for a weekend photo shoot for my Nephew's rehearsal dinner. I was amazed by it. My quick test proved the same thing that Dustin came up with. The VC works extremely well and the light transmission is amazing. I was able to hand hold down to 1/13th of a second and still get a sharp image. When I tested it against my Canon 24-105L F4 it was always a stop better with light transmission. Testing hand held in a dimly lit room at 1/80th and F4 the Canon registered 3200 in auto ISO and the the Tamron registered 2500 at the exact same settings. When opened up to 2.8 the ISO was 1250. I was sad to send it back. The images from the weekend were spectacular and now I want to buy this lens!
THANK YOU SO SO MUCH for your work! I love that you put ALL the details in the video, like naming your pictures so all of us can read all the info about the shot.
Thank you for a detailed review.. What do you suggest btw Tamron 24-70 G2 and Tokina 24-70..? I just made my Tamron buy after watching your review. It may perform better on my canon 5DMIV for landscape..! Thank you...
@@mildredcintron3340 just as what Dustin described, of course there are some weakness like focusing. But the sharpness and color aberration did perform great compare to other competitors. It’s a great lens that can hold your need for a while.
Mr Abbott good morning from Italy - I'd like to know what has been really done on the G2 because as far as I know the optical formula remained basically unchanged from the G1; now, if it was Zeiss, I understood that for some lenses the imagery improvement came not only from the different optical design but also from the longer focusing angle, which, especially in the mid to far distance, helps a lot to maximize focusing accuracy and thus MP for the newest cameras ( I aim to the D850 but everything with 30+ MP is basically suitable for this reasoning ); for example the recently announced Milvus 1.4/25 passed from the 123° of the Distagon 2/25 which was already an excellent lens, to the 172° for the same focusing range, from 0.25m to infinity. I'm not sure Tamron made the same move to achieve a so general and vast improvement almost on every side. What's your take here ?
+dino brusco My understanding is that while the basic optical formula is the same, the materials are not. It’s a higher grade of glass elements combined with improved coatings. The performance of the lenses are actually quite different, with strengths and weaknesses in both lenses
I have a whole series on lens calibration on my channel, which is a good starting point. If you can't get it done, you can also send the camera and lens to Tamron and they will calibrate it for you.
@@DustinAbbottTWI first of all thanks for your reply. I tried to calibrate it by myself but its not something easy to be honest. I contacted with Tamron in Greece (where i belong) and the employer didnt even know if they can calibrate it. They are useless. !!
If you look at the image quality video, you can see exactly how it compares. The Tamron is sharper than the Sigma, has better image stabilization, and is also lighter and cheaper too.
Do you believe that the Tamron 24-70 that you're reviewing can keep up with the new Canon 24-70 RF lens I'm wondering if I should upgrade my 24-70 Tamron when I buy the new EOS R5
Has anyone used this lens for video, in combination with the dual pixel autofocus in newer Canon cameras? I'm looking for feedback/confirmation that it performs well, without any "focus breathing," which sometimes happens with the older model of this lens. I upgraded my camera body recently to a 1DX Mark II, but still using my older Tamron 24-70 I got back in 2012. I was originally considering upgrading to the Canon L series equivalent, but am now reminded that it doesn't have stabilization. Being primarily a video shooter, then perhaps the G2, with its vibration control, is a better route?
Great review as always Dustin. The only thing preventing me from buying this lens is that the barrel telescopes to zoom. A telescoping lens sucks in air as it expands, like a syringe sucking in fluid. This is a huge design flaw for dust and debris to enter and settle on the internal lenses. If this did not expand I would really consider this lens.
I wanna thank dustin for spending much time with 24-70 canon , tamron and sigma lenses. After your deep review i choose Tamron 24-70g2 and i'm very happy with this lens on my 5d mk3.
Thanks for the review. I have the d750 and looking to upgrade my Nikon 24-120mm f4 to a 24-70. Going to order a G2. Thanks again for the extensive reviews.
Dustin is so seriously more than great so it is hard to find comments related to the gear tested because all the comment include appreciation to him =))) and yes, this comment too :))
Hi Dustin. I'm about to make a purchase for my eos r. Between this lens and the RF 24-70. Massive price difference but it's always nice to future proof. I'd love to hear what you think. Tamron seems like a great option but the rf does too. Hope you get this.
I’ve heard that the RF lens is excellent, though I haven’t tested it yet. The G2 will have to be used via adapter but will work fine. I would choose based on your budget restrictions. If you can afford the RF lens, go for it. It will probably be your most used lens. If you have another lens you would be interested in also, you could do the G2 and put the extra money towards lens #2
Have this lens now for my Nikon system and it is great. I must say that I had to do some extensive callibration with the tap in console. Mainly on the 24mm and the short distance. But eventually entered all the 12 valuas and now it is spot on. I read some other reviews were softness was reported at f2.8 and also the 70mm was not super sharp. I wonder if they used the lens out off the box or did some callibration before reviewing. I think that most of the reviewers ( they even admitted) did not callibrate the lens at all so in that case the review is not really representative. If you take the time the callibration does pay off big time.
I suspect that what you say could be true, though I always did my reviews using either manual focus or Live View to take focus issues out of the equation.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Hello Dustin, forgive my ignorance, but allow me to ask: shooting with live view will it not be necessary to calibrate with Tap in Console? I ask because I've just finished ordering my lens and I'm not sure if I'll buy the Tap in Console as well. I will shoot with a Canon EOS RP. And thnk you, very much, for the great review. It helped me a lot to decide on the purchase.
Thank you so much for the great review. When I bought Canon 6D, I watched so many reviews and Videos about the 24-70mm lenses. After i watched your videos, I've decided to purchase Tamron 24-70 mm G2 I am enjoying this great lense from Tamron. I wanted thank you for the great review and I look forward to watch all your videos Mr. Abbott. I am currently saving some money for Tamron 70-200 mm G2 as well. Please keep up the great work Mr. Abbott. You are the best in thise business!
Wow - that's not an easy comparison. The 45 struggles with some CA, but it also provides great looking results at f1.8. The zoom is more flexible, so I guess I would probably choose that if I had just one, but they aren't even close to being the same price.
Hii Dustin.. I had a quick question regarding the focal length physical lock button on the barrel . my g2 lens button or switch locks at only 24mm but not at any other point. Is it how it is designed or did I get a defective one ? Thanx in advance :)
Dustin Abbott Thanx for ur response Dustin .. I thought I can lock the lens at any focal length of my choice and can use similar to a fixed length lens . So I'm wrong! it's ist manufacturers flexibility !?
I want to thank you again for the er... humanity of the reviews. I mean, everyone can stick to chart, statistics and lab tests, but the general user experience - I think that is particularly valuable. So I always wait for the last part with closing comments and final thoughts.
Canon has now produced an IS 24-70 RF lens and will soon bring to market an RF 24-105 f2.8 IS lens. I considered both. I rejected the 24-105 Canon due to its size -it's nearly 8" long, sort of defeating my desire for a general purpose lens. The RF 24-70 IS is expensive (~$2300), nearly twice the cost of the Tamron G2. As a non pro, I'm not prepared to pay that much for a lens. Reviews say that there isn't all that much to set the RF above the G2 optically. So, my G2 is in the mail, and I look forward to using it, having spent the saving (with some extra) on an R5 to go with my 5dm4. Otherwise, I have a EF Canon 16-34 2.8L IS, a EF Canon 50mm 1.4, an EF Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, a Canon 100 2.8L IS macro, and a Canon EF 100-400 4.5-5.6L IS II that I got a great price on refurbished from Canon. I've saved quite a lot by going to used version I or II lenses rather than new version IIIs, and am saving half a fortune buying this G2. I now have to expand my capabilities into the envelope delimited by this one-time pro equipment set. It's so far proven quite a challenge to come up on the digital camera and all these lenses, but I am greatly enjoying it in my retirement. I've appreciated your reviews.
There are definitely some difficult buying decisions out there. I hope you're happy. This lens should work fine on the R5, and of course you can continue to use it on the 5DIV
I guess that depends on what you are doing with the lens. I didn’t notice a lot of issues with it, but I didn’t try to use it for a lot of architectural work
Hi Dustin, your conclusion follows from your observation which is a good thing; compared to others who evaluate the details and then somewhat deviate in their conclusion. Your hard work is really commendable. The way these videos come across is like we are part of your team and we see your methodology/process, how it unfolds to its conclusion. You are very fair but at the same time respectful of the efforts of the manufacturers, i.e. you don't bash them even though you do point our their weaknesses and/or flaws. I have lenses from Canon (L), Tamron (G2s), and Sigma Art, and my experience pretty much agree with yours as far as their overall behavior is concerned. Canon is still king when shooting in ideal situations but Tamron shines in less than ideal situations (like handheld shots and in dark scenes). If I have to use the tripod then I pick up my L lens, no question in my mind. Everything else? I go with my non-Canons. Also, it's a good thing you mentioned the economic aspect of these lenses. Photography is already expensive to begin with, so anything that helps buyers make a good purchase is really appreciated. The majority of photographers don't have an unlimited access to money so we are always looking for that balance between price and performance. In this particular case, it was VERY obvious from the tests that there is only a minor gain from Canon. And that gain is quickly offset by the VC of Tamron. Looking forward to your next reviews. Keep up the good work.
Dustin Abbott I do have the tap. Will that help me get to infinity. I watched your part 3 of dialing a lens in and you mention infinity at the end but I didn't catch how to set it. I see there is an infinity sign but where do I line it up? Is it kind of trial and error to find it?
Okay. What I suggest is that, during the day, you use Live View and focus to infinity. Note where that comes on your lens, and just select that point when you go out at night to shoot stars.
I put that G2 on my A6500 with that Metabone. You will lose your fast auto focus and also acuity decreases.That means you may lose some valuable shots.Most of the time,I work in manual mode rather auto!
I found that it focused fine for me for stills via the MC-11 (I've got a little gallery on my website of photos with that solution). I did not get video AF with that combination. The Sigma has a bit of an advantage there, as the MC-11 is obviously tuned more for Sigma AF algorithms.
i would very much interested in seeing review of the SONY Vario-Sonnar T* 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM II and the tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2, mainly because the ssm11 is the only 24-70mmf2.8 made for the sony "A" mount these days....... REPLY
Dustin, Thank you for the review. I own the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2. This 24-70 model does not have the 3 VC options like the 70-200 does. Which mode would you say the VC on the 24-70 best compares with on the 70-200? I do video just as much as photography and use mode 1 (as recommended by you) for my primary stabilization. Thanks!
You have the ability program the VC for your purposes in the Tap In. If video is a priority, choose Viewfinder Priority, which focuses on smoothing out transitions on and off.
I'm a concert photograph and therefore have to deal a lot with low-light situations. The tamron sounds nice due to it's image stabilization, but how does is behave in dark(er) enviroments compared to the canon one? 1,2k€ vs 1,7k€ is quite a difference and therefore I try/want to get the best one suited for my situation...
do you recommend this lens for apsc? i mean I'd like a normal range, i don't normally shoot at wide angle, mostly i go above the 24 mark which is very close to the 35mm in FF at minimum. the thing about alot of lenses in the apsc world lack fast focusing or lacks image stabilization such as the sigma art lenses. so i am thinking this might be worth getting into. im thinking of mating this with a d7200 but not sure of doing that.
Any chance you will be reviewing the Nikon 28-300 3.5 to 5.6 VR ED anytime soon? I would love to know how sharpness compares to the new Tamron 35 to 150mm.
Hey do you think this new sigma 24-70 is worth the extra money comparing it to the old tamron 24-70?? I already have the older version of the tamron should I upgrade and is it worth it ??? Pls answer my question. And i can’t find your comparison video
Mr. @@DustinAbbottTWI , just got my Tamron 24-70 F2.8 G2 . i had a chance to use the first version but this G2 is far far way better than the first one. i was using Canon original 24-105mm F4.0 L IS combining with 70-200 F2.8 IS ii for my wedding photography and that 24-105mm could not match the color or sharpness of 70-200 F2.8 . now with this Tamron G2 version the color and sharpness is totally matching and can not be more happy to use this lens. i did not go for canon 24-70 F2.8 ii and i think i did the right thing. may be i will miss the range till 105mm but can manage that. thanks a lot for your review. hope to keep in touch. all the best with your channel
Thank you Dustin for your reviews, i was thinking to buy the tamron 24-70 g2 but consolidated it after your reviews, got my lens 2 days back and i must say i am very happy with the purchase, i have been shooting with the canon 24-70 L2(rented when required) from quite some time. the VC on tamron is very useful, just the other day i was able to get sharp images at 2.8 iso 8000 1/15 shutter too. all the points you mentioned about the canon L2 lens is true but as you said in the real world where this lens will be used mostly hand held i think Tamron is the best bet to go ahead, i shoot with a Mark4 and during videos the VC is very helpful, overall to say its a very good purchase and thank you for your detailed reviews :)
Thank you so much for this review! I am planning on getting this lens. I do have one question. I shoot with a Canon 70D. Does the lens do as well on a crop sensor camera? Also I had read recently that the crop facture applies to the focal distance as well as the f stop?? Would there be a better lens for my camera?
I don’t think so. The Canon pretty much guarantees that you will be able to resell it for that amount, which means you could always buy the Tamron later if you decided you needed the image stabilization.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you. Nikon have more Lens Vignetting and its larger.. I'm saving for a 2nd hand D850 first then 24-70mmF2.8 and AFS 70-200mmF2.8 E VR later.
There isn't typically a Mark II on the xxD series. Perhaps you are referring to the 90D, and, no, I don't think it is imminent. The 7D Mark III is rumored to be the next major Canon announcement somewhere around March.
THEN THE TALK ABOUT A CANON D90ll IS A FALSE RUMOR....Thanks.....The rumor was that this camera had built in stabilization plus, too good to be true THEN THE TALK ABOUT A CANON D90ll IS A FALSE RUMOR....Thanks.....The rumor was that this camera had built in stabilization plus, too good to be true i saw videos concerning a canon d90 mark ll, but you are most likely correct, just a rumor....thanks
Hi Dustin I need a Lense which serve my portrait as well as landscape photography purpose, what will you suggest should I go for Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 for Canon or Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 For Canon. I don't have much money so I am thinking to solve my both purpose to one Lense.
Thanks Dustin,...You are who I look for when checking reviews. Your info is great and I trust you more than some others out there. Keep up the good work
Sooo many mixed reviews / QC on this lens it seems..Really want to buy it to use for video work on my A7sii. The Canon 24-70 Mark I is also on my list, but I used it this weekend and wish I had IS built in. On the A7sii you can use in the in-camera stabilization and put it on "auto" so it updates the focal length as you zoom, but that resulted in some random glitches when zooming. The Tamron has all that I think I need...Solid build, stabilizer, f/2.8. But is the image going to actually be good at f/2.8? Maybe I should wait until Tamron works out the kinks?
This seems to be the most versatile 24-70 option on the market. I found that a very mild stopping down to f/3.2 made for a higher contrast, slightly higher resolution experience.
Hi Dustin. From Jakarta, here...! Love your review. I am Canon R6 shooter and thinking to purchase this lens. I wonder if the firmware needs to be updated via Tap-in console prior to using this lens with R6? Also, in 2023, would you still recommend this lens?
The nature of the focus system on the R6 should mitigate the need for focus calibration, but it is possible that a firmware update is necessary for it to work properly via adapter. I haven't tested that combination.
Great review content Dustin I will be picking up this lens this week fo the Nikon D750 do you recommend getting the Tamron tap-in console for the Nikon mount
I think having the Tap In is a great idea - if nothing else for firmware updates. If you will spend the time tweaking the AF in the console you will get great results.
Hello Dustin, Hello everyone, First of all congratulations for your photographic work and also all the technical videos of the comparative lenses 24-70mm new generation. So I tested 3 lenses Tamron 24-70mm G2 for Canon mount, the focus was perfect at all apertures using the central collimators but at F2.8 the collimators of the lateral ends do not seem to work. I contacted a Tamron workshop who told me that according to the classification of objectives this phenomenon was normal and unfortunately unavoidable. I wanted to know if you had noticed? Why Tamron to leave such a fault on his new generation lenses? And why Sigma or Canon do not seem affected by this problem. Those who have the G2 in Canon mount you answers are welcome. Thank you for your help Franck
Hi Franck - I didn't notice that behavior in my review. I did use outer points as a part of my review, and, while autofocus isn't as good in outer points, it was pretty much typical with other lenses.
thank you Dustin for your answer. on my side on the three copies that I tested I had a very sharp image on the sides when I used the central collimator then I reframe while moving to have my element net on the side. On the other hand when I use the collimators of the ends the focus is not good at all unlike the sigma or Canon lenses that I was able to test. if commentators could give their opinion ??
If you could just post a photo to F2.8 (with a 100% detail of that element) or the focus is on an object using one of the last colone's collimators it would be perfect for all of us
Ultimately only you can answer that question. The VC performance is night and day with the new one, the build and focus is much improved, and the image quality is somewhat improved (most improvements are on the periphery of the frame, so you have to decide how important that is).
This guy is one of the most hardworking reviewer of RUclips i have come across. Great Job mate. Wish you lots of luck and happy life.
Thank you for the nice feedback.
Facts!!!
Thanks again for the very detailed and informative review.
You deserve many applause for your hard work.
It is rare to see this level of testing on RUclips.
Keep doing the great work.
Thank you, Yair
6:48 - stabilization is a breaking point. When you traveling, you don't want to bring with you and set tripod for every shot. Thanks for confirming it for me one more time.
My pleasure.
I've gone in three considerable directions in as many days on my next 24-70. I've been gut punched by the (mostly) negative reviews of the 24-70 ART and after finally accepting I went and ordered the Canon 24-70 II but had a change of heart due mostly to the price and now I'm almost completely sold on the Tamron. Many thanks Dustin!
Glad to help out.
Do you still have the Tamron 24-70 ? Are you liking it? I'm looking for an upper tier 24-70 2.8 as well and am considering it. Shooting on a Canon R10. I had theTamron Di VC USD 100-400mm f4-5 6.3 and could not get that thing to focus correctly. I tried it on DSLR and my R10, even with the tap in console trying to dial it in. After probably 400-600 shots, I finally threw in the towel. I know the 100-400 isn't the same focal length, but I'm talking Tamron in general. For this 24-70 2.8, I'm hoping for something really good more for the lower light indoor sports/family stuff. TIA for any insight you may have.
I dont understand why you dont get more views, your videos are just spot on every single time. Thank you please keep it up.
I certainly get far more exposure than I did a year or two ago. Everyone has to pay their dues.
That's right and I think you're at the bottom of an exponential curve.
One can only hope!
Illuminati unconfirmed, lol
Becouse of 14 min. lenght video. People usualy klik on the shorter ones. But you are far better then all of them together.
I cannot buy without hearing you. Thank you for all the effort man!
You're welcome.
also will the Tamron 24-70mm .2.8 wud be a big step forward from the canon 17-55mm .2.8? on a 32.5 megapixel sensor?
The short answer is "yes" - you are starting with a better lens optically.
Thank you Dustin, for doing all of the hard work for me, and a much more through job I might add. I just bought the Tamron lens, and so far I like it. I always liked Tamron going back to the film days, but back then, they were not as comparable to the original manufacturers. The next series of yours that I need to study is the AFMA adjustments to see if I need to do this.
Glad to help out.
Great series of reviews Dustin - super useful. I`ve read so many speculative comments by people claiming the G1 and G2 are `optically identical` and the only difference is build quality. Your experience with the G1 and test results with two of the G2s shows this is not the case. Tamron is seriously upping their game . . .
People saw the same optical formula and ran with it, but the performance is actually quite different on a lot of fronts.
Showing a lot of great pictures in a fast sequence. Unusual: A "gear reviewer" who actually can take great pictures, which of course gives your verdicts more weight...
I do like to think of myself as a photographer first - harder to do now that I am so engaged in doing reviews.
One of the things holding me back from the tamron is Canon DPP, which is my backup raw photo editor if acdsee isn't sufficient or if I want to get the best possible result from Canon glass. I also have an 80D now and plan to move up to the 90D with low weight 'L' EF compatible glass for the next 5 years....been comparing this lens versus the Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS. The canon lens is slower but has a built in macro at 70mm. I assume also cheaper and less weight? That said, the f/4 is not the best on aps-c...
Tamron lenses do come with access to a RAW editor called silkypix.
I was just comparing that G2 to the Sigma, the G2 was my chosen, your review confirmed it. Thank you Dustin, your comparisons are spot on as always.
I'm glad my findings matched your own.
I ordered it, gifting Version 1 to my girl
One of the better reviews out there that actually, well, reviews !
Thank you
Greetings from Victoria Canada! I’m about to get this Tamron!! With you’re exceptional analysis and seamless dialogue; it solidified my decision to acquire one! Thanks Dustin! Top shelf channel!
Thank you very much!
I bought one of these used a few weeks ago and the AF made a TERRIBLE squeak when focusing to infinity, much to my disappointment. But I used it for a few days and loved it so much that I just bought a brand new one and it gets here Thursday. After some Google searches, however, I found that this seems to be a relatively common issue with this lens... so I'm hoping against hope that it doesn't become a problem.
Also, that shot with the hands on the piano keys is absolutely amazing! Love it love it love it.
It's a great lens...I hope you have no real problems with it.
Have it the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 VC G2 and love it
It's a nice lens.
Great review. Would you recommend this lens for the new canon R bodies?
It would work fine, yes.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Great thanks.
As for the weight issue, the 24-70mm G2 is even heavier than the original Tamron 24-70mm. My question is whether the 24-70mm G2 is as sharp as the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, which over its zoom range was objectively sharper than the original Tamron 24-70mm. While the Tamron 28-75mm lacks VC, it's only 510gm and currently retails for $400.
It's actually not true that the 28-75 was sharper (on full frame). The G2 is sharper still, particularly along the edges of the frame.
See for yourself. In full-frame tests, the only place where the 24-70mm is slightly sharper than the 28-75mm is in the far corners at f2.8. At f4-5.6, the 28-75mm is significantly sharper, particularly in the 28-50mm range.
www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/tamron/24-70mm-f2.8-di-vc-usd-sp-model-a007/review/
www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/tamron/28-75mm-f2.8-xr-di-ld-aspherical-if-sp-af/review/
If you are referring to smaller apertures, perhaps, but most of us buy f/2.8 lenses with the intent of shooting them at wide apertures.
Yes, which is why your report on the 24-70mm G2's softness at f2.8 is invaluable. Thank you for your work.
Dustin, I just finished watching all of your videos comparing these lenses, and I feel much more informed on the pros and cons of each option. Mainly I was focused on the differences between the Sigma and the Tamron G2 because they fit nicely within my budget. Much of my research left more questions than answers, but thanks to your in depth testing, I've decided to pull the trigger and try out the Tamron as an all around lens for my Nikon D750. I believe they will pair nicely and it will match my shooting style. Thank you for your high quality, unbiased outlook. You've helped me tremendously!
I'm glad that these comparisons have done the trick for you. That's why I do them.
question, why did tamron stop making this g2 lens for the Sony E mount?
They never did make it for E-mount. They may have made an A-mount verison.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks, I must to getting old, could have sworn they made an ""E mount.... smile.......
Thanks again for a very detailed review! Your photos at around the 1:30 mark look fantastic! Do you have a video talking about some of these beautiful photos you've taken (set-up, gear, advice, etc)?
+Andrew Jarman I have some segments called “what caught my eye” where I cover some of that. The difference in a lot of those photos is that they were ones I had processed, whereas most of the photos I share in reviews are pretty close to out of camera to show lens performance as opposed to showing of my processing techniques.
After several weeks of shooting assignments with my Tamron 24-70g2 I couldn't be more pleased. Thanks to the image stabilization I have already been able to grab several important images that never would have been possible with my older Canon lens. As Dustin has mentioned in his reviews, it is particularly sharp at the wider end vs. the telephoto portion field of view.There is one issue that I have noticed that bothers me. I feel that the lens hood doesn't provide enough protection against glare; I think it's a bit too short in length. I have gotten flare in a couple of backlight images where I thought the hood would have protected me. My old canon hood is physically bigger. I assume that Tamron sized it to fit the max field of view property, but it just doesn't seem right to me; it seems small. Has anyone else noticed this?
+John Halpern I’m assuming by “old Canon” you are referring to the 24-70L Mark I. It has a unique design where the hood can be very deep at times - the hood almost makes it function like an internally zooming lens, a bit. All newer designs from Canon, Tamron, and Sigma abandon that for a lens hood mounted on the front (like most lenses), so they all provide a roughly equal amount of shading. The new Tamron is actually at the front of the pack for flare resistance
your reviews are the best on the whole youtube, once again, great job
My pleasure.
Did you take all those pictures with the tamron G2 i wouldn't mind taking pictures like that. I love taking pictures but i want me a very good lens i don't want to spend that kind of money for the canon L series lenses. I want something with great pictures quality so you're recommending the tamron 24-70 vc g2 thanks Dustin
I did take all of those photos with this lens.
@@DustinAbbottTWI i definitely want to buy this lens. So please tell me this lens can fit on my canon 80d cause i definitely will go buy this same exact lens and start taking beautiful pictures like you did
Your concise and fair reviews is the reason I wait to purchase anything new until I have seen A DA review on it.
Thank you for another fantastic review series Dustin.
That's a lot of trust. Thank you
Great review Dustin. As a wedding photographer I was slightly concerned by the amount of barrel distortion this lens may have shooting at 24mm. Would it really be an issue for wedding and portrait photography?
I doubt it. I've used the previous generation lens for many, many weddings without issue.
Greetings Dustin from Malaysia! I'm a Nikon user. Their previous non VR 24-70 was a legend. New VR version is great but sadly the price is exorbitant. I found this Tamron fits the bill as an alternative to Nikon's current version. Tamron has improved significantly, period. The price alone will shift Nikon and Canon shooters to it alone. Already, this lens is pin sharp in daylight shooting, better still when I attach my NiSi ND's on it. Think Tamron's 70-200 G2 will be equally good. Thank you for your comprehensive review of this Tamron 24-70 G2. You're a real pro Bro
I'm glad you are enjoying the lens. It is a great alternative to those more expensive options.
thank you Dustin you pretty much answered all my questions.
Glad to help!
i decided to go with the sony new (573.00 gray market) 16-50mm f2.8 ssm aps-c lens to replace my full frame sigma previous generation sigma 24-70mm f2.8 because the only other full frame A mount lense for my sony is the carl zeiss ssm11 at $2,100.00....hope it works!.....you sold me on the tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2 BUT tamron does not make this lens for my sony "A" mount!......... tamron lost a bunch of sales to sony "A" mount users....... I believe you are on the top of the food chain in what you do, light years ahead of the others in your presentations and your delivering of the factual information........i trust in your opinion and thats saying alot for me.....
Best review i've seen so far. Thank you for the effort, i really apreciate it! Gonna buy the G2 i think
Enjoy your new lens
i was thinking of upgrading to the canon II from I. now i am going g2 and buying a tap as i will have more than 1 g2 lens with the 600
That's a good idea. It allows you to get the best out of your gear.
Really liked all your reviews! Really really detailed and very professional and unbiased.
Glad you like them!
@@DustinAbbottTWI because of your review, I bought a used lens for this Tamron. Not just this but also the Tamron 70-210 f4 although the latter does have the quirky defocus and refocus whenever you use the longer focal length and you shift focus from a near to far object. Unit already has the latest firmware but still happening. Nevertheless, was not a deal breaker for me as the quality of the lens was still great overall. No regrets.
After having this lens for two years I'm finally going to take it our and about. Great review. Nice photo's.
Sounds like it's about time!
Great review series Dustin!!! I just rented this lens for a weekend photo shoot for my Nephew's rehearsal dinner. I was amazed by it. My quick test proved the same thing that Dustin came up with. The VC works extremely well and the light transmission is amazing. I was able to hand hold down to 1/13th of a second and still get a sharp image. When I tested it against my Canon 24-105L F4 it was always a stop better with light transmission. Testing hand held in a dimly lit room at 1/80th and F4 the Canon registered 3200 in auto ISO and the the Tamron registered 2500 at the exact same settings. When opened up to 2.8 the ISO was 1250. I was sad to send it back. The images from the weekend were spectacular and now I want to buy this lens!
Great feedback. That's part of the reason that I traded the 24-105L for the first gen Tamron lens 5-6 years ago.
I love my 24-105 but I love this one even more lol. I'll be selling it and looking to get this as soon as funds allow.
Planning on getting the Tamron for my D7500 ( yes it's a crop camera)
It’s still a great lens, even if the focal length isn’t quite as useful on crop
THANK YOU SO SO MUCH for your work!
I love that you put ALL the details in the video, like naming your pictures so all of us can read all the info about the shot.
Thank you. I work hard at what I do.
Thank you for a detailed review.. What do you suggest btw Tamron 24-70 G2 and Tokina 24-70..? I just made my Tamron buy after watching your review. It may perform better on my canon 5DMIV for landscape..! Thank you...
I haven't used the tokina, so I can't comment.
this G2 is the best all around 24-70mm f2.8 on todays market, cost plus sharpness plus AF focus, plus plus plus....smile
I just ordered this lense today. Between this lense and the Tamron 18-400 I've exceeded my photo bugat this year.
That's easy to do when great new lenses are released!
Thanks for all the review of 24-70mm G2 fo Tamron. They really helps!
I use Nikon D750, and I bought Tamron due to your extensive review!
Enjoy the lens!
彭軒 How do you like the lens?
Hello. I’m considering this lens. I too shoot with the Nikon 750. How does the lens perform?
@@mildredcintron3340 just as what Dustin described, of course there are some weakness like focusing. But the sharpness and color aberration did perform great compare to other competitors. It’s a great lens that can hold your need for a while.
Mr Abbott good morning from Italy - I'd like to know what has been really done on the G2 because as far as I know the optical formula remained basically unchanged from the G1; now, if it was Zeiss, I understood that for some lenses the imagery improvement came not only from the different optical design but also from the longer focusing angle, which, especially in the mid to far distance, helps a lot to maximize focusing accuracy and thus MP for the newest cameras ( I aim to the D850 but everything with 30+ MP is basically suitable for this reasoning ); for example the recently announced Milvus 1.4/25 passed from the 123° of the Distagon 2/25 which was already an excellent lens, to the 172° for the same focusing range, from 0.25m to infinity. I'm not sure Tamron made the same move to achieve a so general and vast improvement almost on every side. What's your take here ?
+dino brusco My understanding is that while the basic optical formula is the same, the materials are not. It’s a higher grade of glass elements combined with improved coatings. The performance of the lenses are actually quite different, with strengths and weaknesses in both lenses
Thank you, Sir
Hi there.. What about the calibration? I still cant calibrate this lens with my Nikon D750 so i can have great pictures with it . Any tips ?
I have a whole series on lens calibration on my channel, which is a good starting point. If you can't get it done, you can also send the camera and lens to Tamron and they will calibrate it for you.
@@DustinAbbottTWI first of all thanks for your reply.
I tried to calibrate it by myself but its not something easy to be honest.
I contacted with Tamron in Greece (where i belong) and the employer didnt even know if they can calibrate it. They are useless. !!
Great review.Should I expect good results using the Tamron 24-70 on a eos 90D (Canon) crop sensor body?
You will, though the focal range isn't as natural on APS-C (everything must be multiplied by the 1.6x crop factor.
Is there a reason I see you recommending this lens over the Sigma ? Also where does it come image quality wise close to the Canon V 2 ?
If you look at the image quality video, you can see exactly how it compares. The Tamron is sharper than the Sigma, has better image stabilization, and is also lighter and cheaper too.
Do you believe that the Tamron 24-70 that you're reviewing can keep up with the new Canon 24-70 RF lens I'm wondering if I should upgrade my 24-70 Tamron when I buy the new EOS R5
I suspect the new Canon is better, but I haven't reviewed it yet.
Has anyone used this lens for video, in combination with the dual pixel autofocus in newer Canon cameras? I'm looking for feedback/confirmation that it performs well, without any "focus breathing," which sometimes happens with the older model of this lens. I upgraded my camera body recently to a 1DX Mark II, but still using my older Tamron 24-70 I got back in 2012. I was originally considering upgrading to the Canon L series equivalent, but am now reminded that it doesn't have stabilization. Being primarily a video shooter, then perhaps the G2, with its vibration control, is a better route?
Great review as always Dustin. The only thing preventing me from buying this lens is that the barrel telescopes to zoom. A telescoping lens sucks in air as it expands, like a syringe sucking in fluid. This is a huge design flaw for dust and debris to enter and settle on the internal lenses. If this did not expand I would really consider this lens.
That doesn't leave you a lot of options at this focal length, then.
I wanna thank dustin for spending much time with 24-70 canon , tamron and sigma lenses. After your deep review i choose Tamron 24-70g2 and i'm very happy with this lens on my 5d mk3.
+Alessio Gennaro I’m glad its working out for you
Finally, I ordered it. It's just the most suitable 24-70 for my needs (and my budget!)
It's an excellent lens. Enjoy!
Thanks Justin! do you think that this lens will do a good job with the 6DMK2 also??
I used it on the 6D2 some, and it does fine there.
Thanks for the review. I have the d750 and looking to upgrade my Nikon 24-120mm f4 to a 24-70. Going to order a G2. Thanks again for the extensive reviews.
Glad to help out.
What about the video usage, if I go with A7C. Focus n other issues, your advice is highly appreciated.
My experience with adapting Canon EF mount lenses to Sony is that video AF is only okay at best.
Dustin is so seriously more than great so it is hard to find comments related to the gear tested because all the comment include appreciation to him =))) and yes, this comment too :))
LOL - other than the occasional comment telling me I have no idea what I'm talking about ;)
Hi Dustin. I'm about to make a purchase for my eos r. Between this lens and the RF 24-70. Massive price difference but it's always nice to future proof. I'd love to hear what you think. Tamron seems like a great option but the rf does too. Hope you get this.
I’ve heard that the RF lens is excellent, though I haven’t tested it yet. The G2 will have to be used via adapter but will work fine. I would choose based on your budget restrictions. If you can afford the RF lens, go for it. It will probably be your most used lens. If you have another lens you would be interested in also, you could do the G2 and put the extra money towards lens #2
Dustin Abbott thank you so much for your response.
I can't find your video how to calibrate this lens part 4 of your your part utube series videos
+Joe Jessey I don’t have a video on calibrating this lens specifically, as my videos already cover the necessary techniques
Have this lens now for my Nikon system and it is great. I must say that I had to do some extensive callibration with the tap in console. Mainly on the 24mm and the short distance. But eventually entered all the 12 valuas and now it is spot on. I read some other reviews were softness was reported at f2.8 and also the 70mm was not super sharp. I wonder if they used the lens out off the box or did some callibration before reviewing. I think that most of the reviewers ( they even admitted) did not callibrate the lens at all so in that case the review is not really representative. If you take the time the callibration does pay off big time.
I suspect that what you say could be true, though I always did my reviews using either manual focus or Live View to take focus issues out of the equation.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Hello Dustin, forgive my ignorance, but allow me to ask: shooting with live view will it not be necessary to calibrate with Tap in Console? I ask because I've just finished ordering my lens and I'm not sure if I'll buy the Tap in Console as well. I will shoot with a Canon EOS RP. And thnk you, very much, for the great review. It helped me a lot to decide on the purchase.
How is it with 5d iv.
I heard that there is a compatibility issue.
I tested it on the 5DIV - no compatibility issues.
Thank you so much for the great review. When I bought Canon 6D, I watched so many reviews and Videos about the 24-70mm lenses. After i watched your videos, I've decided to purchase Tamron 24-70 mm G2 I am enjoying this great lense from Tamron. I wanted thank you for the great review and I look forward to watch all your videos Mr. Abbott. I am currently saving some money for Tamron 70-200 mm G2 as well.
Please keep up the great work Mr. Abbott. You are the best in thise business!
Thank you!
Hi, if you needed to choose between this lens and 45mm, regarding primarly picture quality, which one would you choose?
Wow - that's not an easy comparison. The 45 struggles with some CA, but it also provides great looking results at f1.8. The zoom is more flexible, so I guess I would probably choose that if I had just one, but they aren't even close to being the same price.
Never are my dilemmas easy ;) Thank you for your answer, take care, we all need you here :)
Excellent video!!! Loves his stuff..... Question Can this Tamron zoom made for
Made for...?
It’s a general purpose lens so it’s for anything and everything!
Hii Dustin.. I had a quick question regarding the focal length physical lock button on the barrel . my g2 lens button or switch locks at only 24mm but not at any other point. Is it how it is designed or did I get a defective one ?
Thanx in advance :)
That’s the way that most zoom locks work. It is to keep the barrel from extending (past 24mm) when packing the lens
Dustin Abbott Thanx for ur response Dustin .. I thought I can lock the lens at any focal length of my choice and can use similar to a fixed length lens .
So I'm wrong! it's ist manufacturers flexibility !?
That's rarely the purpose of a zoom lock.
I want to thank you again for the er... humanity of the reviews. I mean, everyone can stick to chart, statistics and lab tests, but the general user experience - I think that is particularly valuable. So I always wait for the last part with closing comments and final thoughts.
It's true. I think giving my perspective as a photographer is helpful to those that want first hand observations.
Why my lens is haunting always? I have the new version with canon 5D mark 4
+Avi Sadikov That doesn’t sound right at all. I tested on multiple bodies and two different copies and they focused well
Halo Dustin.. Just i want to know about this lens if it is can use for studio portrait?
Sure. Typically the 50-70mm range is most useful for that.
Canon has now produced an IS 24-70 RF lens and will soon bring to market an RF 24-105 f2.8 IS lens. I considered both. I rejected the 24-105 Canon due to its size -it's nearly 8" long, sort of defeating my desire for a general purpose lens. The RF 24-70 IS is expensive (~$2300), nearly twice the cost of the Tamron G2. As a non pro, I'm not prepared to pay that much for a lens. Reviews say that there isn't all that much to set the RF above the G2 optically. So, my G2 is in the mail, and I look forward to using it, having spent the saving (with some extra) on an R5 to go with my 5dm4. Otherwise, I have a EF Canon 16-34 2.8L IS, a EF Canon 50mm 1.4, an EF Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, a Canon 100 2.8L IS macro, and a Canon EF 100-400 4.5-5.6L IS II that I got a great price on refurbished from Canon. I've saved quite a lot by going to used version I or II lenses rather than new version IIIs, and am saving half a fortune buying this G2. I now have to expand my capabilities into the envelope delimited by this one-time pro equipment set. It's so far proven quite a challenge to come up on the digital camera and all these lenses, but I am greatly enjoying it in my retirement. I've appreciated your reviews.
There are definitely some difficult buying decisions out there. I hope you're happy. This lens should work fine on the R5, and of course you can continue to use it on the 5DIV
Is The Barrel Distortion issue noticeable or is the matter of concern?
I guess that depends on what you are doing with the lens. I didn’t notice a lot of issues with it, but I didn’t try to use it for a lot of architectural work
Hi Dustin, your conclusion follows from your observation which is a good thing; compared to others who evaluate the details and then somewhat deviate in their conclusion. Your hard work is really commendable. The way these videos come across is like we are part of your team and we see your methodology/process, how it unfolds to its conclusion. You are very fair but at the same time respectful of the efforts of the manufacturers, i.e. you don't bash them even though you do point our their weaknesses and/or flaws. I have lenses from Canon (L), Tamron (G2s), and Sigma Art, and my experience pretty much agree with yours as far as their overall behavior is concerned. Canon is still king when shooting in ideal situations but Tamron shines in less than ideal situations (like handheld shots and in dark scenes). If I have to use the tripod then I pick up my L lens, no question in my mind. Everything else? I go with my non-Canons. Also, it's a good thing you mentioned the economic aspect of these lenses. Photography is already expensive to begin with, so anything that helps buyers make a good purchase is really appreciated. The majority of photographers don't have an unlimited access to money so we are always looking for that balance between price and performance. In this particular case, it was VERY obvious from the tests that there is only a minor gain from Canon. And that gain is quickly offset by the VC of Tamron. Looking forward to your next reviews. Keep up the good work.
+lyndon mendoza That’s great feedback. Thanks for the taking the time
Hey Dustin, do you know what video of yours shows how to set the Tamron 24-70 G2 to infinity focus? Thank you sir for the information!
Why are you asking? For the Tap In value>
Dustin Abbott I guess I just don't know how to turn focus my lens to infinity. I want to shoot the milky.
Dustin Abbott I do have the tap. Will that help me get to infinity. I watched your part 3 of dialing a lens in and you mention infinity at the end but I didn't catch how to set it. I see there is an infinity sign but where do I line it up? Is it kind of trial and error to find it?
Okay. What I suggest is that, during the day, you use Live View and focus to infinity. Note where that comes on your lens, and just select that point when you go out at night to shoot stars.
How well does the Tamron 24-70 G2 work adapted to the A6500 with either the MC-11 and/or the Metabones?
I put that G2 on my A6500 with that Metabone. You will lose your fast auto focus and also acuity decreases.That means you may lose some valuable shots.Most of the time,I work in manual mode rather auto!
I found that it focused fine for me for stills via the MC-11 (I've got a little gallery on my website of photos with that solution). I did not get video AF with that combination. The Sigma has a bit of an advantage there, as the MC-11 is obviously tuned more for Sigma AF algorithms.
how is this lens on apsc? the previous version was horrible with lots of issues on canon 80d. do you know if it works on apsc as it should?
I did make some APS-C comments in the review, but I didn’t use it extensively on APS-C.
Hello Justin. Can you try this lens with sony body and mc-11 adapter? Thanks in advance.
I don't actually have this lens in my possession anymore. Most all the gear I review is just loaned to me.
Dustin Abbott thanks for your quick reply.
I seen some reviewers say this lens is a little slow to focus
I did test that, and didn't find much of a difference between it and the Canon.
i would very much interested in seeing review of the SONY Vario-Sonnar T* 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM II and the tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2, mainly because the ssm11 is the only 24-70mmf2.8 made for the sony "A" mount these days.......
REPLY
I'm sorry, Howard, but I don't own anything A Mount and don't have time to add another camera system.
thanks anyway......
@Dustin Abbott ...Have you compared the Tamron to the Tokina AT-X Pro 24-70mm F/2.8 FX Lens?
I haven't. I've owned a few Tokina lenses, but when I reached out to them to review some of their newer lenses, they never followed through.
Dustin, Thank you for the review. I own the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2. This 24-70 model does not have the 3 VC options like the 70-200 does. Which mode would you say the VC on the 24-70 best compares with on the 70-200? I do video just as much as photography and use mode 1 (as recommended by you) for my primary stabilization. Thanks!
You have the ability program the VC for your purposes in the Tap In. If video is a priority, choose Viewfinder Priority, which focuses on smoothing out transitions on and off.
I'm a concert photograph and therefore have to deal a lot with low-light situations.
The tamron sounds nice due to it's image stabilization, but how does is behave in dark(er) enviroments compared to the canon one?
1,2k€ vs 1,7k€ is quite a difference and therefore I try/want to get the best one suited for my situation...
I didn't find a big difference in AF speed.
some of the images taken with this lens are sublime. very beautiful rendering.
Thanks. I take pride in being a photographer first and reviewer second.
do you recommend this lens for apsc? i mean I'd like a normal range, i don't normally shoot at wide angle, mostly i go above the 24 mark which is very close to the 35mm in FF at minimum.
the thing about alot of lenses in the apsc world lack fast focusing or lacks image stabilization such as the sigma art lenses. so i am thinking this might be worth getting into. im thinking of mating this with a d7200 but not sure of doing that.
It's not a bad fit so long as you understand the limitations of the focal length on APS-C
Any chance you will be reviewing the Nikon 28-300 3.5 to 5.6 VR ED anytime soon? I would love to know how sharpness compares to the new Tamron 35 to 150mm.
Basically zero chance, as I don't actually review or shoot Nikon products.
Hey do you think this new sigma 24-70 is worth the extra money comparing it to the old tamron 24-70?? I already have the older version of the tamron should I upgrade and is it worth it ??? Pls answer my question. And i can’t find your comparison video
Look at the image quality segment here: ruclips.net/video/efRzdYkgbn4/видео.html
after seeing your review i have bought Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2
And how do you like it?
It's arriving on friday. after using it i will inform you . and thanks for the reply .
Mr. @@DustinAbbottTWI , just got my Tamron 24-70 F2.8 G2 . i had a chance to use the first version but this G2 is far far way better than the first one. i was using Canon original 24-105mm F4.0 L IS combining with 70-200 F2.8 IS ii for my wedding photography and that 24-105mm could not match the color or sharpness of 70-200 F2.8 . now with this Tamron G2 version the color and sharpness is totally matching and can not be more happy to use this lens. i did not go for canon 24-70 F2.8 ii and i think i did the right thing. may be i will miss the range till 105mm but can manage that. thanks a lot for your review. hope to keep in touch. all the best with your channel
I just love your in depth reviews, you put a lot of hard work behind this and your opinion is actually precious. Thank you !
Glad you like them!
Thank you Dustin for your reviews, i was thinking to buy the tamron 24-70 g2 but consolidated it after your reviews, got my lens 2 days back and i must say i am very happy with the purchase, i have been shooting with the canon 24-70 L2(rented when required) from quite some time. the VC on tamron is very useful, just the other day i was able to get sharp images at 2.8 iso 8000 1/15 shutter too. all the points you mentioned about the canon L2 lens is true but as you said in the real world where this lens will be used mostly hand held i think Tamron is the best bet to go ahead, i shoot with a Mark4 and during videos the VC is very helpful, overall to say its a very good purchase and thank you for your detailed reviews :)
Doing the handheld comparison was important, I believe, to painting the full picture
Thanks for the review. Have you try this lens to a Canon corp sensor like 80D ..??
Yes. If you look at the written review referenced in the description there is a section about APS-C.
Thank you so much for this review! I am planning on getting this lens. I do have one question. I shoot with a Canon 70D. Does the lens do as well on a crop sensor camera? Also I had read recently that the crop facture applies to the focal distance as well as the f stop?? Would there be a better lens for my camera?
Crop factor affects EVERY lens without exception. It does fine in that transition to APS-C.
Great review! If I were able to buy a used Canon 24-7- f/2.8 version 2 for $1,200, would you still this lens over it?
I don’t think so. The Canon pretty much guarantees that you will be able to resell it for that amount, which means you could always buy the Tamron later if you decided you needed the image stabilization.
Is the af as good as the canon 24-70mm or good enough for video?
Definitely good enough for video.
Last year we bought the lens mainly because of your review.
And we are very happy with the lens on our Nikon Z6II as well.
Thank you
Great to hear!
I currently looking at Tamron and Nikon 24-70 for D850
The Tamron is a solid value, though the newest Nikon is I believe sharper.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you. Nikon have more Lens Vignetting and its larger.. I'm saving for a 2nd hand D850 first then 24-70mmF2.8 and AFS 70-200mmF2.8 E VR later.
Do you have any information on the Canon90D ll?.....i think it may be my answer, since i value your opinion i ask you.....
There isn't typically a Mark II on the xxD series. Perhaps you are referring to the 90D, and, no, I don't think it is imminent. The 7D Mark III is rumored to be the next major Canon announcement somewhere around March.
THEN THE TALK ABOUT A CANON D90ll IS A FALSE RUMOR....Thanks.....The rumor was that this camera had built in stabilization plus, too good to be true
THEN THE TALK ABOUT A CANON D90ll IS A FALSE RUMOR....Thanks.....The rumor was that this camera had built in stabilization plus, too good to be true
i saw videos concerning a canon d90 mark ll, but you are most likely correct, just a rumor....thanks
Sir, could you kindly do a review of the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, would love to hear your opinion for the Nikon D850
Probably not, because there are so many new lenses and requests from companies to do reviews that I have little time for reviewing existing lenses.
Hi Dustin I need a Lense which serve my portrait as well as landscape photography purpose, what will you suggest should I go for Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 for Canon or Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 For Canon. I don't have much money so I am thinking to solve my both purpose to one Lense.
The 24-70 is the better place to start, then work towards the 70-200. With those two lenses you can shoot just about everything!
thank you so much
Just watched this review and it is superb. I couldn't ask for more your detail blew me away.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thanks Dustin,...You are who I look for when checking reviews. Your info is great and I trust you more than some others out there. Keep up the good work
That's good to hear
Sooo many mixed reviews / QC on this lens it seems..Really want to buy it to use for video work on my A7sii. The Canon 24-70 Mark I is also on my list, but I used it this weekend and wish I had IS built in. On the A7sii you can use in the in-camera stabilization and put it on "auto" so it updates the focal length as you zoom, but that resulted in some random glitches when zooming. The Tamron has all that I think I need...Solid build, stabilizer, f/2.8. But is the image going to actually be good at f/2.8? Maybe I should wait until Tamron works out the kinks?
This seems to be the most versatile 24-70 option on the market. I found that a very mild stopping down to f/3.2 made for a higher contrast, slightly higher resolution experience.
Dustin Abbott thank you ! Renting one this week
This lens is producing too much vignetting in all lengths. Do you think this is a good solution for videography also?
Can it compare to the Nikkor 24-70mm too?
I'm not a Nikon reviewer, so I cant really give you an informed opinion on that.
Hi Dustin. From Jakarta, here...! Love your review. I am Canon R6 shooter and thinking to purchase this lens. I wonder if the firmware needs to be updated via Tap-in console prior to using this lens with R6? Also, in 2023, would you still recommend this lens?
The nature of the focus system on the R6 should mitigate the need for focus calibration, but it is possible that a firmware update is necessary for it to work properly via adapter. I haven't tested that combination.
Great review content Dustin I will be picking up this lens this week fo the Nikon D750 do you recommend getting the Tamron tap-in console for the Nikon mount
I think having the Tap In is a great idea - if nothing else for firmware updates. If you will spend the time tweaking the AF in the console you will get great results.
Hello Dustin, Hello everyone,
First of all congratulations for your photographic work and also all the technical videos of the comparative lenses 24-70mm new generation. So I tested 3 lenses Tamron 24-70mm G2 for Canon mount, the focus was perfect at all apertures using the central collimators but at F2.8 the collimators of the lateral ends do not seem to work. I contacted a Tamron workshop who told me that according to the classification of objectives this phenomenon was normal and unfortunately unavoidable. I wanted to know if you had noticed? Why Tamron to leave such a fault on his new generation lenses? And
why Sigma or Canon do not seem affected by this problem.
Those who have the G2 in Canon mount you answers are welcome.
Thank you for your help
Franck
Hi Franck - I didn't notice that behavior in my review. I did use outer points as a part of my review, and, while autofocus isn't as good in outer points, it was pretty much typical with other lenses.
thank you Dustin for your answer. on my side on the three copies that I tested I had a very sharp image on the sides when I used the central collimator then I reframe while moving to have my element net on the side. On the other hand when I use the collimators of the ends the focus is not good at all unlike the sigma or Canon lenses that I was able to test. if commentators could give their opinion ??
If you could just post a photo to F2.8 (with a 100% detail of that element) or the focus is on an object using one of the last colone's collimators it would be perfect for all of us
Do you think it is worth upgrading from the G1 version?
Ultimately only you can answer that question. The VC performance is night and day with the new one, the build and focus is much improved, and the image quality is somewhat improved (most improvements are on the periphery of the frame, so you have to decide how important that is).
Dustin, thank you so much for your response. Gives me much to consider. Keep up the great reviews!