I love shooting with the 35mm framelines/crop on, with DNGs on, so that I can reframe a little if needed. Reminds me of shooting my Film Leica M with 35mm lens, except I can get the benefit of recropping if necessary!
The Q-line is a great back up camera for professional photographers and often a good choice for amateurs, who just want a one lens point and shoot camera. It's a superb companion for M shooters, who have their 50 or/and 75/90 mm prime lens, but want an extra camera body and a wide angel lens. The quality will remain, long after the price is forgotten. Keep on rolling and enjoy life!
Love the Q3 and have had two Q's a Q2 prior..I never really bonded with the Q until this one.. Absolutely love it, pretty much disagree with all the negatives you mention. 28mm is my favorite focal length, if it were 35mm I couldn't really use it as i shoot street. Focusing is fantastic. I think you needed a bit more time with it, including getting used to using the tilt screen. Multi field metering is not what I would ever use.
@taylor : are you doing weddings with the Q? I'd like to switch as well cause it feels more creative to go to a wedding with one camera than a whole bunch of gear.
Q3 overall better image quality for me. But the film sims on the Fuji are very very nice. So I think it just comes down to preference and if you want that film simulation look or something more natural
I still love my Q2. I don’t use it for weddings, still have the Sonys for that, but I do want to upgrade at some point to the Q3. Nice video big guy- hope you’re well
Recently got my Q3. I actually prefer shooting RAW and love the colours that it normally shoots with. I tried the Leica looks and something just didn’t look right to my eyes. Like you, I’m hoping they open it up to the public to make and share our own. Edit- I tried the thumb and side grip and found myself reverting to shooting without either. Guess it fit my hand well. I agree with the wrist wrap take, makes it much nicer to shoot with. Edit 2- I’ve locked down ISO to a max of 3200 and shutter to mechanical only and even then, I find it clicking fast enough for me. 4 FPS is fine for me even when clicking moving objects. It has yet to fail me.
Currently using a d600 and took photos of my kids jumping into water aka relatively fast movement. Would the shutter be able to handle that mechanical only? Still learning as an amateur photographer so was curious about it being able to handle that scenario. The technology has changed a lot so I'm not sure how the d600 compares but I bet it's no where near current tech. Hoping to avoid rolling shutter
Thanks for all the helpful information. Making me miss Japan. Curious if those looks carry over to post if you are shooting in RAW. Guessing the answer is no. On the waiting list!
Coming from a Fujifilm, where I do have a minimum shutter speed option together with a min and max ISO setting, I've been 1h with a Q3 in my hand in a store and didn't undertand the concept on a Leica. Also went to the PDF manual, dowloaded from the site and on page 195 I got even more confused. It's like the concept is max shutter speed (instead of min). I should give an example of what I use frequently on my Xpro3: I fix a profile with min shutter speed to 1/250 for street photography, with min ISO = 160 and max ISO = 6400. I then go on using the aperture ring on the lens, usually between f/4 and f/8 ... imagine I'm shooting at f/4, shutter auto goes to 1/1000, ISO go auto on 160, there is enough light so the camera prioritises low ISO, makes sense ... I then push the aperture to f/8, the shutter speed automatically goes down but locks on 1/250 (because I've set it up before) and thats when the ISO kicks up until I do get the right auto exposure. So the sequence for me on Fujifilm is Aperture (manual) > Shutter (min value 1/250) > ISO AUTO until 6400. This is very important for my street workflow and I would love to clarify my doubts here before thinking about the Q3. Help appreciated
Hi, I used to shoot Fujifilm too, X-Pro1 and X-T2 (I still have two X-T2's). Since then I've been shooting a Leica Q2 and now a Q3. It is true that on the Fuji in Auto ISO mode you can set base ISO, maximum ISO and minimum shutter speed. On the Leica Q camera's you can set maximum ISO and minimum shutter speed (it's called Shutter Speed Limit). So except for the base ISO, which you can't set on a Leica Q, it always starts with ISO 100, it is practically the same as with the Fuji and you can shoot with the Q in the same manner you're used to with the Fuji.
The sensor on this camera reads out slower than the Q2’s so it’s definitely that. The blackout times are also noticeably longer on the Q3 compared to the Q2. I hope they can improve the blackout times as I don’t really care about the electronic shutter jello issues.
@@jcbarker1 excellent point which is not revealed in Q3 reviews. I will say they did remove the exposure constraints that the Q2 had for long exposures. I'd rather have a fast electronic shutter read out though. I don't think I'm buying the Q3 I have the Q2M I do miss color but hey thats ok
Nice video Taylor! You said that you are not going to buy the grip for the wireless charging, does that mean you already bought the Camera or are buying it 😅
honestly with no offense to the channel but this review is really lightweight with in depth discussion and thoughts about the Q3. So many better reviewers out there for Leica products.
@@RobberZhi yes it does, if Sony made another one with a better battery, same sensor as the Q3, USB-C charging, etc., I’d be in front of the line to buy one!
What is the appeal of the Kodak Gold 100/200 film? I think it was the film a photographer grabbed from the drugstore when they forgot to get what they really wanted from the camera store.
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
If you're a wedding photographer, come to Canada Photo Summit this fall! www.canadaphotosummit.ca/
I love shooting with the 35mm framelines/crop on, with DNGs on, so that I can reframe a little if needed. Reminds me of shooting my Film Leica M with 35mm lens, except I can get the benefit of recropping if necessary!
The Q-line is a great back up camera for professional photographers and often a good choice for amateurs, who just want a one lens point and shoot camera. It's a superb companion for M shooters, who have their 50 or/and 75/90 mm prime lens, but want an extra camera body and a wide angel lens. The quality will remain, long after the price is forgotten. Keep on rolling and enjoy life!
How is it a great backup with only one lens, with fixed focal length? great backup for another Q?
bought the Q3 last week and loving it so far
Love the Q3 and have had two Q's a Q2 prior..I never really bonded with the Q until this one.. Absolutely love it, pretty much disagree with all the negatives you mention. 28mm is my favorite focal length, if it were 35mm I couldn't really use it as i shoot street. Focusing is fantastic. I think you needed a bit more time with it, including getting used to using the tilt screen. Multi field metering is not what I would ever use.
@taylor : are you doing weddings with the Q? I'd like to switch as well cause it feels more creative to go to a wedding with one camera than a whole bunch of gear.
I haven’t, but it would be a lot of fun
Great video. Thank you. Your honest opinion about the sooc jpgs of Fujifilm X100VI & the Q3..
Q3 overall better image quality for me. But the film sims on the Fuji are very very nice. So I think it just comes down to preference and if you want that film simulation look or something more natural
I still love my Q2. I don’t use it for weddings, still have the Sonys for that, but I do want to upgrade at some point to the Q3.
Nice video big guy- hope you’re well
Recently got my Q3. I actually prefer shooting RAW and love the colours that it normally shoots with. I tried the Leica looks and something just didn’t look right to my eyes. Like you, I’m hoping they open it up to the public to make and share our own.
Edit- I tried the thumb and side grip and found myself reverting to shooting without either. Guess it fit my hand well. I agree with the wrist wrap take, makes it much nicer to shoot with.
Edit 2- I’ve locked down ISO to a max of 3200 and shutter to mechanical only and even then, I find it clicking fast enough for me. 4 FPS is fine for me even when clicking moving objects. It has yet to fail me.
Currently using a d600 and took photos of my kids jumping into water aka relatively fast movement. Would the shutter be able to handle that mechanical only? Still learning as an amateur photographer so was curious about it being able to handle that scenario. The technology has changed a lot so I'm not sure how the d600 compares but I bet it's no where near current tech.
Hoping to avoid rolling shutter
@@Ares-vh8cmI will have a look and get back to you. Should theoretically be ok.
Thanks for all the helpful information. Making me miss Japan. Curious if those looks carry over to post if you are shooting in RAW. Guessing the answer is no. On the waiting list!
Can I ask you where did you get the strap? Thanks
The wireless charger is horrible....need to place the camera with German precision to get it to charge
Hahah oh no. Sorry to hear that.
Nah you just have to use your eyes and it works really well. I’ve had zero issues
And also it blocks the battery and the card which extremely annoying
Coming from a Fujifilm, where I do have a minimum shutter speed option together with a min and max ISO setting, I've been 1h with a Q3 in my hand in a store and didn't undertand the concept on a Leica. Also went to the PDF manual, dowloaded from the site and on page 195 I got even more confused. It's like the concept is max shutter speed (instead of min). I should give an example of what I use frequently on my Xpro3: I fix a profile with min shutter speed to 1/250 for street photography, with min ISO = 160 and max ISO = 6400. I then go on using the aperture ring on the lens, usually between f/4 and f/8 ... imagine I'm shooting at f/4, shutter auto goes to 1/1000, ISO go auto on 160, there is enough light so the camera prioritises low ISO, makes sense ... I then push the aperture to f/8, the shutter speed automatically goes down but locks on 1/250 (because I've set it up before) and thats when the ISO kicks up until I do get the right auto exposure. So the sequence for me on Fujifilm is Aperture (manual) > Shutter (min value 1/250) > ISO AUTO until 6400. This is very important for my street workflow and I would love to clarify my doubts here before thinking about the Q3. Help appreciated
Hi, I used to shoot Fujifilm too, X-Pro1 and X-T2 (I still have two X-T2's). Since then I've been shooting a Leica Q2 and now a Q3. It is true that on the Fuji in Auto ISO mode you can set base ISO, maximum ISO and minimum shutter speed. On the Leica Q camera's you can set maximum ISO and minimum shutter speed (it's called Shutter Speed Limit). So except for the base ISO, which you can't set on a Leica Q, it always starts with ISO 100, it is practically the same as with the Fuji and you can shoot with the Q in the same manner you're used to with the Fuji.
@@ivan_mervillie thank you very much 🙏
@@ivan_mervillie thank you very much 🙏
@@Racsophoto My pleasure.
I’m still debating if I want to buy the Q2 or wait for my pre-order to come in for the Q3.
Same here :-D
I recommend Sony A7RV also Leica lens is only f1.7 not f1.4
do you think this can be a person's only landscape camera? sufficient?
The electronic shutter on the Q2 was fine. do you think its because of the 60MP sensor
The sensor on this camera reads out slower than the Q2’s so it’s definitely that. The blackout times are also noticeably longer on the Q3 compared to the Q2. I hope they can improve the blackout times as I don’t really care about the electronic shutter jello issues.
@@jcbarker1 excellent point which is not revealed in Q3 reviews. I will say they did remove the exposure constraints that the Q2 had for long exposures. I'd rather have a fast electronic shutter read out though. I don't think I'm buying the Q3 I have the Q2M I do miss color but hey thats ok
Nice video Taylor! You said that you are not going to buy the grip for the wireless charging, does that mean you already bought the Camera or are buying it 😅
Yah this one is mine
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto The Q3 is the only Leica I could seeing buying
Now that you've had the Q3 for a month+, I'd be interested to know if you've changed your opinion on any of these positives and negatives.
honestly with no offense to the channel but this review is really lightweight with in depth discussion and thoughts about the Q3. So many better reviewers out there for Leica products.
Have Leica Look for black & white style?
They have a few build in and I think 3 in the app. One is a blue and one is sepia tho
Leica lens is only f1.7 not f1.4 maybe Sony A7RV better ?
Sony lenses are only f1.2. Maybe Nikon canon and Fuji are better with their f1.0 and f0.95
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto Nikon doesn’t have enough lens range. Fuji is not full frame and Nikon has issues with eye focusing on their flagship models.
Then the choice is obvious, get the Q3
G master lens more superior than Q3 lens also have manual aperture ring
So does the Q3. The choice is easy
35mm is also a thing for me.......
Amen to smaller form factor and 35mm lens!
One day maybe
Rx1 ticks both boxes.
@@RobberZhi yes it does, if Sony made another one with a better battery, same sensor as the Q3, USB-C charging, etc., I’d be in front of the line to buy one!
Th pics look like any fuji. Its all about editing In the end of the day
Rule #1
What is the appeal of the Kodak Gold 100/200 film? I think it was the film a photographer grabbed from the drugstore when they forgot to get what they really wanted from the camera store.
I personally prefer the look of it over something more expensive like a Portra 400. In this video it was just a random example tho
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto Sadly, Agfa Portrait 160 was discontinued almost 20 years ago...
Could bring it back with a Leica Look 👀
After purchasing one, I couldn't get back to my X100v fast enough. The justification of this is just ridiculous.
What’s stopping Leica to make “looks” available for Q2?
Probably money. They want you to upgrade
nice toy.. but 6000€... its like to buy a ferrari but with a motor from a kya :)
i have Q1, and i see no single reason to upgrade.
So you can brag to loose acquaintances on the internet that you have the new one
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto I only have the Q3 because I couldn't afford the Q or the Q2. Took me a while to put aside enough money.