A couple of viewers have pointed out a distinction I did NOT distinctly make (😊) about lens equivalence: the depth of field will NOT be identical for different crops at the same aperture at the same object size; the perspective will not be the same when both are held constant either. Both are a function of distance from the subject.The exposure, however, WILL be the same. Thanks to those of you who reached out. I LOVE THIS COMMUNITY!
I understand. I for one would prefer a Q with a 50mm f2 as the base, with crop factors up from 50mm. Subject separation from background is more important than a wide view when photographing people. I feel that there is room for a second Q, which would probably see many Q owners buying a second Q…
Marketing bien géré , certainement bien construit, comme la production habituelle chez Leica, mais il reste un appareil de niche avec un 28mm quelle idée! avec un bricolage pour les autres focales, pour 1200€ j'ai le même usage dans mon sac de chez Fuji. J'en reste au M10 pour le boulot.
As I’m re orientating myself after my wife’s cancer, loosing my dog and my father (seriously a bad patch), I’ve had an epiphany, your videos are deeply wonderful, yes they’re about cameras and photography, but more than that they’re truly inspiring highlighting why life is so wonderful and precious, if you take a moment to see. Greetings from England. See you in the Lake District one day maybe.
It was just 5 years ago that I bought my first camera. It was a Leica Q. At the time Ken Hansen told me “nothing beats the Q.” That was all I needed then. Sounds like the 2 and now the 3 are continuing that legacy.
I love my Q2. Had it for just over 3 years now and it still continues to amaze me and, most importantly, inspire me to go out and shoot. I'm sure I'll update to the Q3 at some point but for now I'll sit it out and wait for he hype to calm down and then go for a Q3. Perhaps when a reporter edition comes out in a few years. The Q2 reported edition is really a killer look. so a Q3 reporter might just be it for me.
Perfect timing! I was about to jump on a used Leica Q. I'll wait just a little bit more for the price to go down a bit more. I'll look into Q3 in 10 years!
Bravo! First time I'm seriously thinking about a Leica. Not psychologically there yet, and I have a ways to go in learning the craft before I reward myself with such a purchase, but your pitch / description of this piece of technology is one for the books: simply brilliant on so many levels - you, I mean, not the Leica. Might not be everyone's schtick, with a high word-/concept-rate and extremely spec-heavy delivery, but the aura and performance of the object you're describing eventually muscle through the language field and resonate in the mind's eye. You are a force of nature and these videos remind me of some of the best in-yer-face theater and Brecht's boxer, albeit sped up a bit. Great work all around. These clips are priceless, your knowledge a benefit to the global community. Now take a bow. ;-)
I must confess this camera slays me. As a working photographer for over fifty years, I have only purchased a hand-full of new cameras because I am very financially conservative. Yeah that's charm school lingo for cheap. This camera is going to keep me awake at night because being me, I know I will wait five or so years to consider buying one, which will make me 75 years old. So in reality I will most likely never own one unless I sell my M-P240 (never), some of my incredible lenses (maybe) or someone like a major news corporation uses one of my photos without obtaining license to do so (yep, that has happened) and I offer them a deal to keep the issue confidential for a very large check.
The only thing I'm not really seeing is the Leica look we all used to read about or even see ourself, that look? Now this has the Sony A7RIV sensor, and yes it has the excellent 28mm lens, which is all Leica. I just don't see the "look" here, it's absolutely an amazing sensor and it's top image quality for sure, I get that part. I just think CMOSIS makes the sensors, which give or gave us that look. Certain sensors are just unbelievable, like the Nikon D700, Canon 5D, Nikon D4/Df and D4s all have amazing sensors, with a unique look. There are many Leica camera's I could name that have sensors and processors which seem to really give the Leica look, but at least this new Leica camera has the excellent 28mm and it's holding up, even on this 60+ MP sensor/camera. I absolutely love the Leica Q2 Reporter and hopefully the will now come down some in price or more will show up on the used market, but I doubt the prices will drop anytime soon, as far as retailer's are concerned.
Getty images are using one of my pictures taken in the 1970s and charging big bucks for a copy without my permission. I've been using the Q2 since it came out i don't think i will upgrade to the Q3 I'll wait for the Q4 😂
I’m going to a funeral tomorrow. A friend dropped dead suddenly and quite unexpectedly at only 68 years of age. Very much planning for his future and not retired, but looking forward to a family holiday in September. A holiday that neither he or his wife will now take. If you want this camera and can afford it, go for it and enjoy it while you can, because tomorrow may never arrive. Any money you have saved up will be of no use to you when you are no longer here or if your brain has turned to mush.
Free tip for Leica: develop a camera identical to the q-series with detachable lenses with the same quality of the 28f1.7 just 35, 50, 75 and 90. Call it the z-series. The last camera everyone buys.
I hope this means the Q2 used market will cool off a bit to where I could afford one. The Q3 looks lovely, but I don't need the improvements it offers - not even the autofocus as I find that manual often helps me make a better composition. So I might finally be able to spring for the Q2.
@@Skipsul HA! I get it. I actually plan to keep my Q2 reporter. Love the look and style of that camera and of course image output is superb. It's my first Leica so it has some sentimental value to me. Best of luck getting a Q, it definitely a great camera regardless of which you get.
This Man brings Poetry, Soul, intellect and an avalanche of words I struggle to repeat let a long interpret to camera reviews. But his love of photography and images shines through. And when he loves a camera as he clearly does the Q3, you can tell without words, just look in his eyes !! I think I’ve found the camera I want, the camera I need !! Thks.
As a former M6 owner and watching the first Q, I waited until I saw the Q2 and purchased it in 2019. AND...well understanding there would be a Q3 at some point in the future. That time has come. As we often see with up-graded products, there are minimal improvements however, with the Q3 Leica has hit the ball out of the park. So, I like other Q owners, have a decision to make. While I continue to be extremely happy with my Q2, I'll have to noodle on this regarding to upgrade as well as where to sell my Q2. Thanks for an outstanding overview.
Good points re Q3. I had an original Q and a Q2 color. Sold both. I found the Q "system" a bit limiting due to the one lens limitation. I have a Q2 Mono which I find not limiting at all. Strange how the mind works! I'll likely update to a Q3 Mono when that's available. After recent surgery that will limit my bending ability, the flip screen will prove vital to continued camera use. Time to revisit the Q System. You mentioned the digital crop ability frequently in this video. In the past the digital crop was not applied to RAW files; only JPGs. Has this changed?
Thank you so much for comparing and commenting on all the “free” gear it comes with and eliminates at the same time. I shoot my M11 + 28 Lux 75% of the time and just recently out the 50mm back on it to try it out again. But honestly, I’m still loving the 28mm more. Now with Autofocus on the Q3, I’m tempted as sometimes my manual focusing skills do hold me back a bit and I miss that second of a moment. Decisions, decision. I’m actually afraid I’ll end up using a Q3 more if I go get this. Hmmm…
Superb video and overview. With its video, I am now questioning my SL2S purchase few months back. Q3 has it all and better except fixed lens which can be understood as zoom lens. Been able to crop images - and video, even no perfect .. you can get a lot from this. Very very tempting.
It is becoming increasingly clear that the cooperation between Leica and Panasonic is bearing great fruit for both sides. For both companies. (By the way, Wetzlar is only 30 km from my hometown).
A crop is a crop, a28mm is and stay a 28mm. It doesen`t matter what the marketing departement at Leica tell you. Besides that the tilty screen is definetley a welcome benefit.
I’m not the Leica marketing department; they didn’t talk me about this; and I encourage you to read the pinned comment as well as the other comments touching upon this point. 🖖🏻
I don’t think you mentioned it - sorry if you did - the sensor in the Q3 is now BSI which should along with the option to reduce the pixel count with pixel binning make the Q3 a low light monster
it’s a great camera I had a Q2 and I was very happy with it but the question is is it better than a Hasselblad X2D? I doubt it, the focusing will be better on the Q3 but in overall resolution and dynamic range, color I think the next X2D is going to win handsomely.
Thank you so much, Hugh. If I ever own a Leica, it will be a Q3. I do wish I could shoot with the Exa my dad bought just after he was discharged from the Army 80 years ago.
Hugh is such an articulate “enthusiast “ For fine camera gear , he has convinced me to order the Q3 43 , and today I bought a Q3 new .. am afraid to watch his next video
The Q2M will still have A LOT more resolution for prints than a 60mp sensor with bayer filter. You have to go north of 150mp to reach the resolution of the Q2M sensor. The only Leica that has the Q2M beat for details in print are the M11M and, in the future, Q3M
I’m in this dilemma myself. Whether to wait for the Q3M or go for the still incredible Q2M. I don’t like editing bw through colour channels, perhaps I’m just not good at it, but I think it looks unnatural very quickly. I prefer to darken or lighten areas with masks/selections. The main upgrade for me would be the usb charging. No joke, that stuff is so good when travelling. The flip screen is a nice though, although I find waist level shooting on these little screens just aren’t anything the same as looking down in my 500CM
@@tor2919I have been told this by several people but have yet to find any real data to back up the claim. Any chance you can point me to a video or article that has some type of testing to demonstrate just how much better the monochrome sensor is for black and white? A used Q2M is quite a bit cheaper than the brand new Q3 and my current project is all black and white. While I would love the new features I can live without them, particularly if I can get as good or better quality black and white images. Thanks
Very cool video!!! When you say it crops to 35 and 50mm, you mean crop only and not compression, right? If that’s correct, isnt it better and simpler just to crop in post whenever necessary?
I had the original Q and never got on with it. I currently shoot an M10R with 50 and 35 Lux lenses. The Q3 is tempting but I think it still has way too much futz as you put it. What I would really like is that EVF in place of the rangefinder on an M...
I have been a very proud owner of the Q2 untill the day, when I realized that if the electronic of the body dies, also the excellent lens will end up in the bin. That was the moment I changed to the M11 and a Leica Summilux 35. Its not so much about the money, but throwing a fully functional Leica lens away, because standard electronical parts give up, its a no go. But apart from that, the Q are great tools to take pictures.
When was the last time a well made digital camera gave up on you? I’ve had 25 of them probably and never had a failure plus. An M11 and 35 summilux is 2.5 times the price. It’s a real Leica though. The Q is kinda half Leica
I've been pro for 35yrs + I have cameras for my studio - high end Hass etc - but the Q's - oh dear they are a must have for my personal camera - I have had them all and this one will also be on the cannot wait to get it list
Interesting to see Leica add ‘film simulations’ to their camera for jpeg images. I can’t wait for that strategy to become mainstream and have significant user customization.
Okay, I tried the Q3... but it's not for me. What I want when I photograph is to compose my picture at capture, not by cropping afterwards. So I need a compact with Zoom AND excellent lens quality (as good as the sum micron 28mm f1,7 ??). What would you recommend?
The Q lens FOV is already ~25mm unless they've increased the distortion correction crop on the Q3. I'm not sure if this is due to users looking at the horizontal FOV and reporting 25mm vs Leica using the diagonal FOV and coming up with 28mm or what.
I pre-ordered on the first day. It remains to be seen just how long I will twist in the back order winds… In the mean time, I will continue watching Hugh’s video on repeat :)
I love the Q2 and use the crop modes, but your comparison of crop images to the 35 and 50 lux was a bit off. I wish the Q could match the images from those lenses, but the equivalent depth of field cropping the Q to a 35mm would be obtained using the 35 at F2.0, and at 50 mm it would be a full F4.0. You can't crop a 28m 1.7 to 50mm and get a shallow DOF. So I usually think it is still worth carrying around a great 50 on my M for people and close street images.
@@3BMEP Thanks for replying! (I am a fan of your videos). I think I didn't make my point well, but it is important. People make this mistake all the time. At the SAME distance, say 2 M, a 28mm 1.7 lens has a DOF of around 52 cm, while a 50 mm lens at 1.7 would have a DOF of only 16 cm. Much less DOF at same distance and at same aperture due to the focal length. You just can't get a LUX 50 level shallow DOF with the 28 1.7 at portrait distance due to the laws of physics. Thanks - and keep up the good work!
@@AKAgni-i7s I think I didn’t make my point well! At the same object size, the DOF of the 28 and 50 at 1.7 and 1.4 are very close. In order to have the same object size, the the Q3 with 28 would have to close the distance of, say 4’ for the 50 to about 2’ 3”. At that point, the difference in DOF would be less than 1/2” In other words: I think we are saying the same thing. 😊👍🏻
@@3BMEP OK - but no... hold that thought (with all due respect)... You often talk about having a lot of megapixels and "cropping the .." out of the image, and the Q3 does has the crop frame lines - you imply in the video it is like having extra lenses. I am saying that if you use the Q3 crop frame lines, and pretend you are using say a 50mm, you will in fact get an image like you are using a 50 F 4.0+ lens. You would not use the crop frame lines AND walk in to half the distance to your subject in practice. So we are kind of saying the same thing, but I think your video description would be misleading to many which is why I commented in the first place. Thanks!
I appreciate this thread. You are right that I would NOT choose to close the distance, because the perspective would not be as flattering as with a 50. Thank you for your persistence!
Excellent, balanced thoughts. Much appreciated. For the price of the new Q3 I'm sure an SL2 or Leica T PLUS a used Q or Q-P could be found. But life can be short and maybe a Q3 is worth every penny?
Look at their MTF charts at f/5.6 especially, which is where I typically shoot for urban landscape and much classic street. It is also better suited for flash with its leaf shutter.
When that Q3M drops so is my wallet. Thanks Hugh for another inspiring review. Your approach and style is quite unique and makes for compulsive viewing. Enjoy Claudia's new Q3
Sir, you speak convincingly! Thank you for the Q3 talk. It would immensely help first time Q3 buyers if you could kindly do a beginners set up etc video
I have had a Q for a few years, it is amazing but I felt no need to get a Q2, so was not expecting to want a Q3, but I was wrong. I will be looking to get one as soon as I am able, this thing is amazing and life is too short, not to be capturing memories with it. Fantastic Review.
Thank you for the quick review Hugh. The Q3 looks like a terrific camera. I loved using my Q2 Monochrom and only (regrettably) traded it in recently to get 10x42 Noctivid binoculars and a used Elmarit-M 28 mm lens. I really miss that camera. In the hand, the Q2 Monochrom felt like an old school film camera thanks to its simple design, and dedicated aperture ring and shutter speed dials (where they belong). Even though I still have the CL, SL2, and M11, and have an M11 Monochrom on order, I can see getting a Q3 later this year.
Nice review, but what about the DOF in 35 and 50mm. Is this the same like you compare with the 1.4 lenses ? I think the DOF is based on the 28mm and the other modes are just crop, the same you do in LR f.e.
Sold. Getting the Q3. When does your grip launch for purchase? I'm not a pro, but your business case / value proposition for the Q3 is totally compelling. Great video and thanks for your encyclopedic knowledge.
Another Leica home run ! I have the Q2M which I won't part with. This Q3 will be in my hands as well. I'm trying to wait a bit for no other reason than self restraint is a tool of appreciation. Hugh I predict you will sell your SL2 for the SL3. The SL3 will have the same sensor as the Q3 which will have at least two more stops of usable ISO and significantly improved AF. !!!!!!!!
A typical fantastic review from Hugh that blends Leica technical info with humanistic touches, sample shots, and humor. I frantically start searching for coins under the couch after watching this video. Trouble.
Hugh could you please tell me which music you used in your video, when you present the first series of photos ..? I like it very much but don‘t know the artist and the song… Thanks for your videos which are always a highlight of the wekk..
When comparing crops on Q3 with 35 and 50 mm lenses, it would be fair to say, that it no longer keeps f1.7 looks in depth of field. It’s equivalent of putting f1.7 FF lens on APS-C.
HI! I preordered my Q3 on June this year and received it in August. Went to Brussels on vacation 15 days on September and took around 400 raw pictures of Art Nouveau buildings. When I came back started to work on them and in September I bought an Q2M all from the local Leica shop in Barcelona. Period....
Amazing what megapixel count can do for any lens innit? ..love your enthusiasm Hugh. Oh and I did notice every example photo( nice) you posted were B&W conversions ...
Thanks for the Fuji mention! ❤ I agree it’s about the photographers heart. I love care and lust after it just like everyone else, but cannot possibly justify a purchase like this one. I have some really beautiful Fuji bodies and glass that work for me just fine. That being said, if I find a good deal on a Q2 I may just go for it. I have yet to experience the digital farm of Leica on the streets and as a street photographer, my life wouldn’t be really complete without that experience I suppose …well, according to some anyway!
Im in the same boat, sitting on ±3000$ of fuji gear, thinking that in one year when rich people start selling their barely used Q3's, I might sell and switch
The 28mm lens can crop down to shoot 35, 50, 75 & 90. But aren't you always shooting at 28mm? You're not going to get the separation or optics of a 75mm lens, right?
@@albertbarton4663 No. They are one and the same and thing: the II get the full 60mp frame, but it will open in LR cropped. Change the crop, and you’ll find you indeed have the entire frame at your disposal. Claudia LOVED this; I like it too. 😊🖖🏻
Agreed with all of the above Hugh. I really hope it's possible to implement Video Stabilisation in firmware - the 8K cine L-Log files are exquisite but I had to resort to mounting the Q3 on a Ronin RS3 Pro (overkill). Hope Leica and Ronin work on some compatibility here. Apart from Leica Looks - some new Leica LUTs would be great. The Classic 709 works beautifully with the Log files in Final Cut. Internal memory would have been great - that was the only thing they should have brought over from the TL2 and M11. Great to have the ability to do some short full featured videos in such a small camera.
Most of my works are under low light condition. How is image quality and noise comparing between Q2 and Q3 in low light with high ISO? I would appreciate to your advice.
I don’t have the Q2 in-house so can’t compare directly, but in my experience at the same object size, higher megapixel sensors are a better overall choice for me.
After watching your powerful , entertaining , and persuasive videos .. I did buy , as found someone other than some ruthless Philistines who want my first born ( I have no children:) in excessive markups …. It finally starting cooling off enough over here in Phoenix .. wow! I certainly am delighted as I am certain I never photographed with any lens this great !, it does inspire us !, and not in a fanboy kind of way … The detail, dynamic range and colors make me glad I finally started saving money a few months back as I am thinking my young wife can make the leap from iPhones up to the 343 ,, or maybe I just want one and can justify it this way …. Hold that …….
I'm not sure i understand the praise for the cropping modes as from what I can tell the raw file still has the full focal length. Is there any difference between the crop mode and cropping in post? I will say this makes the recent Q review more interesting for those of us still dreaming about owning a Leica one day.
Hugh, I bought a new M11 in silver, a Visioflex Mk 2, a Summilux 50mm F1.4 about 18 months ago ... I just have not used them (and I mean, I have not used them at all!!!) ... I will take a hit but I am thinking of trading them in for the Leica Q3 ... what do you think? I already have a Nikon Qf with lenses and also the new Sony A7RV with lenses ... and am getting very little use of those also ... I previously had a Leica M240 plus the 50mm APO sum micron and the 35MM Summilux F1.4 ... and did not use these either .. is there something wrong with me?
I watched your vids for years. Enjoyed them. But after a while, I thought 'This is mostly about style. His delivery is quirky but really good. His vocabulary is superb. But the information is not practical to me.' I'm a demographic that Leica targets. 68, no kids. Separated. Still working. Very nice income. Lots of savings. Photography is my passion. I resisted the Q and was happy with X100 and X100S. Resisted the Q2... "I like my x100V". Enjoyed a different RUclips dude who said "Leica is jewelry for men." And smugly avoided Leica. But the arguments presented here are persuasive enough for me to consider buying that piece of expensive jewelry.
Thanks so much for this video, I always appreciate your view and words on things. Honest, articulated and objective. I especially like the words at the end about the heart and soul of a photographer, these are the things that separate the cameras and tech from what the photographer sees and executes, and this heart and soul aspect will be (is already) challenged by the new up-and-comer photographer of the world- AI. Thanks always
I may be able to buy a Q3 soon and I really hope I can. I love my canon r5 but i want a leica q3 for reasons i don’t quite know. Maybe its because my dad and i used to look at these high end cameras and since losing him I want to honour him. Will it make me a better photographer? Probably not. But it may encourage me to go out and take more photos and get out of my comfort zone.
You are really compelling me to go get a Q3. By the way the shots were excellent. Especially the last shot looking downtown only in NY. Thanks again Hugh.
The most important point is this: the Q3 is less versatile than the M11 series, but it is far superior for anyone shooting at that focal length who needs the speed of AF because he or she has concluded that zone focusing is not the answer.
Great video, great youtube channel. What about the quality of the prints if you use 35, 50 or 75 mm? I usually sell 50X75cm prints. Will they be of good quality? Also, I've tried the Q3, and I get the impression that there's a lot of distortion, which is quite unpleasant to the eye. And in the viewfinder, everything seems so far away and so small with the 28mm...
Depends on subject matter, composition and crop. 35 FOV no proble; 50 unlikely to be a peoblem; 75 or 90 may become problems, again a function of the above.
Excellent essay on the Q3, which I'm considering getting, except for the price I could get 2 or 3 very much needed lenses for my Nikon Z 6II. I wish you had shown some color photos taken with the Q3. Meanwhile, a question: Your last photo, which showed a crop of 90mm, was horizontal, whereas the uncropped photo appears to be vertical. Is it not possible to make a vertical crop?
Hey! Congratulations on reaching 100k subscribers. BTW - I bought the Q3. It's my 65th birthday present to me. Me. Mine. Love it! I shoot on manual most of the time, but guess what? I shoot on auto sometimes, too. This camera does not judge me. It just takes great pictures.
A couple of viewers have pointed out a distinction I did NOT distinctly make (😊) about lens equivalence: the depth of field will NOT be identical for different crops at the same aperture at the same object size; the perspective will not be the same when both are held constant either. Both are a function of distance from the subject.The exposure, however, WILL be the same. Thanks to those of you who reached out. I LOVE THIS COMMUNITY!
Indeed.. still Q is aamzing. Love my q2m
Your Vocabulary is Amazing Mr. Hugh Brownstone.
And you look like James Gunn so that's cool.
I understand. I for one would prefer a Q with a 50mm f2 as the base, with crop factors up from 50mm. Subject separation from background is more important than a wide view when photographing people. I feel that there is room for a second Q, which would probably see many Q owners buying a second Q…
Marketing bien géré , certainement bien construit, comme la production habituelle chez Leica, mais il reste un appareil de niche avec un 28mm quelle idée! avec un bricolage pour les autres focales, pour 1200€ j'ai le même usage dans mon sac de chez Fuji.
J'en reste au M10 pour le boulot.
As I’m re orientating myself after my wife’s cancer, loosing my dog and my father (seriously a bad patch), I’ve had an epiphany, your videos are deeply wonderful, yes they’re about cameras and photography, but more than that they’re truly inspiring highlighting why life is so wonderful and precious, if you take a moment to see. Greetings from England. See you in the Lake District one day maybe.
So sorry to learn of your misfortune, but happy you can find a measure of comfort from our work. Lake District is wonderful!
I have owned a Q1 since day 1. This will be my first real Q upgrade. Great video, as always, thanks!
It was just 5 years ago that I bought my first camera. It was a Leica Q. At the time Ken Hansen told me “nothing beats the Q.” That was all I needed then. Sounds like the 2 and now the 3 are continuing that legacy.
I love my Q2. Had it for just over 3 years now and it still continues to amaze me and, most importantly, inspire me to go out and shoot. I'm sure I'll update to the Q3 at some point but for now I'll sit it out and wait for he hype to calm down and then go for a Q3. Perhaps when a reporter edition comes out in a few years. The Q2 reported edition is really a killer look. so a Q3 reporter might just be it for me.
Perfect timing! I was about to jump on a used Leica Q. I'll wait just a little bit more for the price to go down a bit more. I'll look into Q3 in 10 years!
Bravo! First time I'm seriously thinking about a Leica. Not psychologically there yet, and I have a ways to go in learning the craft before I reward myself with such a purchase, but your pitch / description of this piece of technology is one for the books: simply brilliant on so many levels - you, I mean, not the Leica. Might not be everyone's schtick, with a high word-/concept-rate and extremely spec-heavy delivery, but the aura and performance of the object you're describing eventually muscle through the language field and resonate in the mind's eye. You are a force of nature and these videos remind me of some of the best in-yer-face theater and Brecht's boxer, albeit sped up a bit. Great work all around. These clips are priceless, your knowledge a benefit to the global community. Now take a bow. ;-)
Thank you, John, for such generous encouragement! 🙏🏻🖖🏻
I must confess this camera slays me. As a working photographer for over fifty years, I have only purchased a hand-full of new cameras because I am very financially conservative. Yeah that's charm school lingo for cheap. This camera is going to keep me awake at night because being me, I know I will wait five or so years to consider buying one, which will make me 75 years old. So in reality I will most likely never own one unless I sell my M-P240 (never), some of my incredible lenses (maybe) or someone like a major news corporation uses one of my photos without obtaining license to do so (yep, that has happened) and I offer them a deal to keep the issue confidential for a very large check.
The only thing I'm not really seeing is the Leica look we all used to read about or even see ourself, that look? Now this has the Sony A7RIV sensor, and yes it has the excellent 28mm lens, which is all Leica. I just don't see the "look" here, it's absolutely an amazing sensor and it's top image quality for sure, I get that part. I just think CMOSIS makes the sensors, which give or gave us that look. Certain sensors are just unbelievable, like the Nikon D700, Canon 5D, Nikon D4/Df and D4s all have amazing sensors, with a unique look. There are many Leica camera's I could name that have sensors and processors which seem to really give the Leica look, but at least this new Leica camera has the excellent 28mm and it's holding up, even on this 60+ MP sensor/camera. I absolutely love the Leica Q2 Reporter and hopefully the will now come down some in price or more will show up on the used market, but I doubt the prices will drop anytime soon, as far as retailer's are concerned.
Well.. who needs two kidneys? 😂
Getty images are using one of my pictures taken in the 1970s and charging big bucks for a copy without my permission. I've been using the Q2 since it came out i don't think i will upgrade to the Q3 I'll wait for the Q4 😂
I’m going to a funeral tomorrow. A friend dropped dead suddenly and quite unexpectedly at only 68 years of age. Very much planning for his future and not retired, but looking forward to a family holiday in September. A holiday that neither he or his wife will now take. If you want this camera and can afford it, go for it and enjoy it while you can, because tomorrow may never arrive. Any money you have saved up will be of no use to you when you are no longer here or if your brain has turned to mush.
Free tip for Leica: develop a camera identical to the q-series with detachable lenses with the same quality of the 28f1.7 just 35, 50, 75 and 90. Call it the z-series. The last camera everyone buys.
I hope this means the Q2 used market will cool off a bit to where I could afford one. The Q3 looks lovely, but I don't need the improvements it offers - not even the autofocus as I find that manual often helps me make a better composition. So I might finally be able to spring for the Q2.
Bon chance!
Buy my Q2 Reporter for $4500 😅
@@A1000Truths Heh. I'll need the price to come down a wee bit more. In the meantime I have a daughter's wedding to pay for first too.
@@Skipsul HA! I get it. I actually plan to keep my Q2 reporter. Love the look and style of that camera and of course image output is superb. It's my first Leica so it has some sentimental value to me. Best of luck getting a Q, it definitely a great camera regardless of which you get.
This Man brings Poetry, Soul, intellect and an avalanche of words I struggle to repeat let a long interpret to camera reviews. But his love of photography and images shines through. And when he loves a camera as he clearly does the Q3, you can tell without words, just look in his eyes !! I think I’ve found the camera I want, the camera I need !! Thks.
As a former M6 owner and watching the first Q, I waited until I saw the Q2 and purchased it in 2019. AND...well understanding there would be a Q3 at some point in the future. That time has come. As we often see with up-graded products, there are minimal improvements however, with the Q3 Leica has hit the ball out of the park. So, I like other Q owners, have a decision to make. While I continue to be extremely happy with my Q2, I'll have to noodle on this regarding to upgrade as well as where to sell my Q2. Thanks for an outstanding overview.
Truly my pleasure! 😊🖖🏻
Not only am I getting a review of the Q3 (in ways that matter), I'm getting Jon Stewart too (ok, without the laughs)!
Talk about value.
Thanks!
Another exceptional video😮 thank you so much
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
thank you for your lovely review: I enjoy the way you discuss these things with wit, intelligence and humour - best wishes
Much appreciated, Daniel. 😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
Excellent dry sense of humor. Best intro video I have watched on the Q3. Thank you. Especially on cropping.
My pleasure! 😊🖖🏻
Good points re Q3. I had an original Q and a Q2 color. Sold both. I found the Q "system" a bit limiting due to the one lens limitation. I have a Q2 Mono which I find not limiting at all. Strange how the mind works! I'll likely update to a Q3 Mono when that's available. After recent surgery that will limit my bending ability, the flip screen will prove vital to continued camera use. Time to revisit the Q System.
You mentioned the digital crop ability frequently in this video. In the past the digital crop was not applied to RAW files; only JPGs. Has this changed?
Thank you so much for comparing and commenting on all the “free” gear it comes with and eliminates at the same time. I shoot my M11 + 28 Lux 75% of the time and just recently out the 50mm back on it to try it out again. But honestly, I’m still loving the 28mm more. Now with Autofocus on the Q3, I’m tempted as sometimes my manual focusing skills do hold me back a bit and I miss that second of a moment. Decisions, decision. I’m actually afraid I’ll end up using a Q3 more if I go get this. Hmmm…
You just might. I’m shooting with our own Q3. Stay tuned!
Superb video and overview. With its video, I am now questioning my SL2S purchase few months back. Q3 has it all and better except fixed lens which can be understood as zoom lens. Been able to crop images - and video, even no perfect .. you can get a lot from this. Very very tempting.
It is becoming increasingly clear that the cooperation between Leica and Panasonic is bearing great fruit for both sides. For both companies. (By the way, Wetzlar is only 30 km from my hometown).
A crop is a crop, a28mm is and stay a 28mm. It doesen`t matter what the marketing departement at Leica tell you. Besides that the tilty screen is definetley a welcome benefit.
I’m not the Leica marketing department; they didn’t talk me about this; and I encourage you to read the pinned comment as well as the other comments touching upon this point. 🖖🏻
I don’t think you mentioned it - sorry if you did - the sensor in the Q3 is now BSI which should along with the option to reduce the pixel count with pixel binning make the Q3 a low light monster
I didn't - thanks for the note!
it’s a great camera I had a Q2 and I was very happy with it but the question is is it better than a Hasselblad X2D? I doubt it, the focusing will be better on the Q3 but in overall resolution and dynamic range, color I think the next X2D is going to win handsomely.
I’ll let you know; hold that thought. 😉🖖🏻
Your video inspired me to do some more research on Q3. I got back into the Leica Q system after watching your video.
Enjoy!
FANTASTIC PRESENTATION TECHNIQUE MY MAN!!!!
Hello Hugh thank you for sharing. I'm conflicted should buy a Q3 or a 907X CFV 100C, sadliy can only have one lol
Thank you so much, Hugh. If I ever own a Leica, it will be a Q3. I do wish I could shoot with the Exa my dad bought just after he was discharged from the Army 80 years ago.
Wow! 80 years ago! In any case: my pleasure, Barry!
Hugh is such an articulate “enthusiast “
For fine camera gear , he has convinced me to order the Q3 43 , and today I bought a Q3 new .. am afraid to watch his next video
Thanks for the great video. I am curious to know if you think the Q3, for black and white photography, will be better than the Q2 Monochrome.
It is for me because - holding all of the other differences aside - retaining color channel information for the edit is important.
The Q2M will still have A LOT more resolution for prints than a 60mp sensor with bayer filter. You have to go north of 150mp to reach the resolution of the Q2M sensor. The only Leica that has the Q2M beat for details in print are the M11M and, in the future, Q3M
I’m in this dilemma myself. Whether to wait for the Q3M or go for the still incredible Q2M.
I don’t like editing bw through colour channels, perhaps I’m just not good at it, but I think it looks unnatural very quickly. I prefer to darken or lighten areas with masks/selections.
The main upgrade for me would be the usb charging. No joke, that stuff is so good when travelling. The flip screen is a nice though, although I find waist level shooting on these little screens just aren’t anything the same as looking down in my 500CM
@@tor2919 In the Leica Q2 and Q2 Monochrom series, in any case, there is no way to charge the battery via USB.
@@tor2919I have been told this by several people but have yet to find any real data to back up the claim. Any chance you can point me to a video or article that has some type of testing to demonstrate just how much better the monochrome sensor is for black and white? A used Q2M is quite a bit cheaper than the brand new Q3 and my current project is all black and white. While I would love the new features I can live without them, particularly if I can get as good or better quality black and white images. Thanks
Just ordered a Leica Q3 after finding one in stock by the blessing of the gods. Can't wait to get it. Thanks for the review!
Enjoy!
Nice analogy Hugh, its a fantastic camera and a nice extension on a great line of cameras
Very cool video!!! When you say it crops to 35 and 50mm, you mean crop only and not compression, right? If that’s correct, isnt it better and simpler just to crop in post whenever necessary?
grateful to have stumbled upon your channel; great insights, thank you.
I had the original Q and never got on with it. I currently shoot an M10R with 50 and 35 Lux lenses. The Q3 is tempting but I think it still has way too much futz as you put it. What I would really like is that EVF in place of the rangefinder on an M...
I understand.
@@3BMEP I knew you would!
I have been a very proud owner of the Q2 untill the day, when I realized that if the electronic of the body dies, also the excellent lens will end up in the bin. That was the moment I changed to the M11 and a Leica Summilux 35. Its not so much about the money, but throwing a fully functional Leica lens away, because standard electronical parts give up, its a no go. But apart from that, the Q are great tools to take pictures.
That’s a good and interesting point. Nice way to look at it
Valid point
When was the last time a well made digital camera gave up on you? I’ve had 25 of them probably and never had a failure plus. An M11 and 35 summilux is 2.5 times the price.
It’s a real Leica though. The Q is kinda half Leica
Sell everything.
U might expire tomorrow. 😅😅😅
@@MrFL08 You are right, I never faced a hardware issue so far. Just the idea made me shiver😅
Nice job, well done …thank you!
Thank you too! 😊🖖🏻
I've been pro for 35yrs + I have cameras for my studio - high end Hass etc - but the Q's - oh dear they are a must have for my personal camera - I have had them all and this one will also be on the cannot wait to get it list
Enjoy!
Interesting to see Leica add ‘film simulations’ to their camera for jpeg images. I can’t wait for that strategy to become mainstream and have significant user customization.
Okay, I tried the Q3... but it's not for me. What I want when I photograph is to compose my picture at capture, not by cropping afterwards. So I need a compact with Zoom AND excellent lens quality (as good as the sum micron 28mm f1,7 ??). What would you recommend?
Look at Sony a7C II with 24-50/2.8 or 20-70/4.
@@3BMEP Thanks! Will look into it. Had to mention it... it's to have as a compact alternative to my X2D on holidays. Thanks again.
The Q lens FOV is already ~25mm unless they've increased the distortion correction crop on the Q3. I'm not sure if this is due to users looking at the horizontal FOV and reporting 25mm vs Leica using the diagonal FOV and coming up with 28mm or what.
I’ve heard similar things. Don’t know either!
Noticed the "Brownstone Brothers" moving truck at 4:28 🙂 Any relation?
Good eye, but no. Amazing serendipity though, right? 😊
You present with style and clarity. so interesting. I have the Q, its great. I want the Q3...Damn you! :)
😎😊🖖🏻
I pre-ordered on the first day. It remains to be seen just how long I will twist in the back order winds… In the mean time, I will continue watching Hugh’s video on repeat :)
😉🖖🏻
At 2:15 in you have a ERROR freeze for several seconds in your video
Not an error - a freeze frame to give viewers time to read the note on the screen.
@@3BMEP I thought so but just thought I would mention
That crop was incredible ✌🏻
Right? 😊🖖🏻
I love the Q2 and use the crop modes, but your comparison of crop images to the 35 and 50 lux was a bit off. I wish the Q could match the images from those lenses, but the equivalent depth of field cropping the Q to a 35mm would be obtained using the 35 at F2.0, and at 50 mm it would be a full F4.0. You can't crop a 28m 1.7 to 50mm and get a shallow DOF. So I usually think it is still worth carrying around a great 50 on my M for people and close street images.
True, DOF is a function of distance from the subject. 👍🏻
@@3BMEP Thanks for replying! (I am a fan of your videos). I think I didn't make my point well, but it is important. People make this mistake all the time. At the SAME distance, say 2 M, a 28mm 1.7 lens has a DOF of around 52 cm, while a 50 mm lens at 1.7 would have a DOF of only 16 cm. Much less DOF at same distance and at same aperture due to the focal length. You just can't get a LUX 50 level shallow DOF with the 28 1.7 at portrait distance due to the laws of physics. Thanks - and keep up the good work!
@@AKAgni-i7s I think I didn’t make my point well! At the same object size, the DOF of the 28 and 50 at 1.7 and 1.4 are very close. In order to have the same object size, the the Q3 with 28 would have to close the distance of, say 4’ for the 50 to about 2’ 3”. At that point, the difference in DOF would be less than 1/2” In other words: I think we are saying the same thing. 😊👍🏻
@@3BMEP OK - but no... hold that thought (with all due respect)... You often talk about having a lot of megapixels and "cropping the .." out of the image, and the Q3 does has the crop frame lines - you imply in the video it is like having extra lenses. I am saying that if you use the Q3 crop frame lines, and pretend you are using say a 50mm, you will in fact get an image like you are using a 50 F 4.0+ lens. You would not use the crop frame lines AND walk in to half the distance to your subject in practice. So we are kind of saying the same thing, but I think your video description would be misleading to many which is why I commented in the first place. Thanks!
I appreciate this thread. You are right that I would NOT choose to close the distance, because the perspective would not be as flattering as with a 50. Thank you for your persistence!
Thank you John Stewart, I love your show
😉
Own a q2 but ordered the 3. Lovely presentation. Great to watch and learn.
😊🖖🏻
Excellent, balanced thoughts. Much appreciated. For the price of the new Q3 I'm sure an SL2 or Leica T PLUS a used Q or Q-P could be found. But life can be short and maybe a Q3 is worth every penny?
you Sir are brilliant. you really should have a mainstream tv show.
Did you say the Q lens is superior to the 10k M 28mm summilux? Can you elaborate?
Look at their MTF charts at f/5.6 especially, which is where I typically shoot for urban landscape and much classic street. It is also better suited for flash with its leaf shutter.
Mate I love this clip, you and your maths!
When that Q3M drops so is my wallet. Thanks Hugh for another inspiring review. Your approach and style is quite unique and makes for compulsive viewing. Enjoy Claudia's new Q3
😜😊👍🏻🖖🏻
When selecting 50mm crop, do you still get the bokeh?
You get the bokeh of the crop equivalent. Thus 1.786 * f/1.7 ~= f/2.8
Sir, you speak convincingly! Thank you for the Q3 talk. It would immensely help first time Q3 buyers if you could kindly do a beginners set up etc video
Will put it into the queue, no promise on timeframe!
@@3BMEP Thank you. Looking forward to it
Thanks a lot. Liked the review a lot!
😊🖖🏻
Would if I could, but hey that is one beautiful camera and worth raving about.
I have had a Q for a few years, it is amazing but I felt no need to get a Q2, so was not expecting to want a Q3, but I was wrong.
I will be looking to get one as soon as I am able, this thing is amazing and life is too short, not to be capturing memories with it.
Fantastic Review.
Life IS short. Enjoy!
Thank you for the quick review Hugh. The Q3 looks like a terrific camera. I loved using my Q2 Monochrom and only (regrettably) traded it in recently to get 10x42 Noctivid binoculars and a used Elmarit-M 28 mm lens. I really miss that camera.
In the hand, the Q2 Monochrom felt like an old school film camera thanks to its simple design, and dedicated aperture ring and shutter speed dials (where they belong). Even though I still have the CL, SL2, and M11, and have an M11 Monochrom on order, I can see getting a Q3 later this year.
You are incorrigible, John! 😉
@@3BMEP Thanks in large part to you! ~\8^)
Nice review, but what about the DOF in 35 and 50mm. Is this the same like you compare with the 1.4 lenses ? I think the DOF is based on the 28mm and the other modes are just crop, the same you do in LR f.e.
Correct. Please see my pinned comment.
I do wish it allowed a square aspect ratio. Like the SL series has. Always love your enthusiasm Hugh. Smiles.
😊🖖🏻
Sold. Getting the Q3. When does your grip launch for purchase? I'm not a pro, but your business case / value proposition for the Q3 is totally compelling. Great video and thanks for your encyclopedic knowledge.
Enjoy! As for the grip? Pre-orders opening very soon. Hold that thought!
Another Leica home run ! I have the Q2M which I won't part with. This Q3 will be in my hands as well. I'm trying to wait a bit for no other reason than self restraint is a tool of appreciation. Hugh I predict you will sell your SL2 for the SL3. The SL3 will have the same sensor as the Q3 which will have at least two more stops of usable ISO and significantly improved AF. !!!!!!!!
I won't take that bet! ;)
You'll want the faster AF tilt screen and improved sensor why not? @@3BMEP
A typical fantastic review from Hugh that blends Leica technical info with humanistic touches, sample shots, and humor. I frantically start searching for coins under the couch after watching this video. Trouble.
😉🙏🏻🖖🏻
Nice review totally agree nice shots ..
Hugh could you please tell me which music you used in your video, when you present the first series of photos ..?
I like it very much but don‘t know the artist and the song…
Thanks for your videos which are always a highlight of the wekk..
"You had me at hello" .....ordered one!
Barry!! 😊😍
Hey Barry! I’m on a waitlist. How did you order?
@@stuartshook3614 leica miami...doing a trade
ugh! Thanks for the review Huge... I want! But can't at the moment. But man that camera and it's features are compelling, even more now.
When comparing crops on Q3 with 35 and 50 mm lenses, it would be fair to say, that it no longer keeps f1.7 looks in depth of field. It’s equivalent of putting f1.7 FF lens on APS-C.
Please see pinned comments.
Simply great and charming review. Thx!
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
Where do you drill into the body to add a microphone jack?
Great review! I like the last part about the 'photographer . That Q3 looks really nice.
Does it outperform the Q2 monochrome in detail and high ISO noise when converted to B&W?
It’s close than you might imagine when compared at same object size.
You won't see a difference in a print.
@@r423fplip we’re all pixel peepers here, taking into consideration we have a remote interest in a 60mp camera lol
Does the Q3 share exact same sensor as the M11? ...upgrading from Q2 to Q3 :)
Exact? I couldn’t say. Remarkably similar / identical from an output perspective? Thus far: yes. 😊💯
HI! I preordered my Q3 on June this year and received it in August. Went to Brussels on vacation 15 days on September and took around 400 raw pictures of Art Nouveau buildings. When I came back started to work on them and in September I bought an Q2M all from the local Leica shop in Barcelona. Period....
I guess you enjoyed it! 😊🖖🏻
Indeed! My first Leycas. Very much.
Ah finally, think it’s time for me to jump in and try a Leica
Amazing what megapixel count can do for any lens innit? ..love your enthusiasm Hugh. Oh and I did notice every example photo( nice) you posted were B&W conversions ...
Correct. No need for me personally to go Monochrom, and I have a budget, too. 😊🖖🏻
Great analysis as usual
Thanks for the Fuji mention! ❤ I agree it’s about the photographers heart. I love care and lust after it just like everyone else, but cannot possibly justify a purchase like this one. I have some really beautiful Fuji bodies and glass that work for me just fine. That being said, if I find a good deal on a Q2 I may just go for it. I have yet to experience the digital farm of Leica on the streets and as a street photographer, my life wouldn’t be really complete without that experience I suppose …well, according to some anyway!
Im in the same boat, sitting on ±3000$ of fuji gear, thinking that in one year when rich people start selling their barely used Q3's, I might sell and switch
Fantastic content as ever
can you tether with this updated camera or still have to quick view via the Leica app ?
As I recall - no, it’s too early in the morning, I may be wrong, so - I’ll have to get back to you!
Just watched this again. Double damn you, Hugh!
You have NO idea, Peter! 😎🖖🏻
“Brownstone Moving & Storage”. Cute.
Good eye, Peter!
The 28mm lens can crop down to shoot 35, 50, 75 & 90. But aren't you always shooting at 28mm? You're not going to get the separation or optics of a 75mm lens, right?
What does that last shot in the montage look like to you?
Is there a difference between (1) shooting at 35mm to 90mm or (2) cropping the image in post?
@@albertbarton4663 No. They are one and the same and thing: the II get the full 60mp frame, but it will open in LR cropped. Change the crop, and you’ll find you indeed have the entire frame at your disposal. Claudia LOVED this; I like it too. 😊🖖🏻
But I should answer your original question more fully: see my pinned comment.
Agreed with all of the above Hugh. I really hope it's possible to implement Video Stabilisation in firmware - the 8K cine L-Log files are exquisite but I had to resort to mounting the Q3 on a Ronin RS3 Pro (overkill). Hope Leica and Ronin work on some compatibility here. Apart from Leica Looks - some new Leica LUTs would be great. The Classic 709 works beautifully with the Log files in Final Cut. Internal memory would have been great - that was the only thing they should have brought over from the TL2 and M11. Great to have the ability to do some short full featured videos in such a small camera.
Very good to know about the q3 thanks 😊 🎉
My pleasure 😊
Most of my works are under low light condition. How is image quality and noise comparing between Q2 and Q3 in low light with high ISO? I would appreciate to your advice.
I don’t have the Q2 in-house so can’t compare directly, but in my experience at the same object size, higher megapixel sensors are a better overall choice for me.
After watching your powerful , entertaining , and persuasive videos .. I did buy , as found someone other than some ruthless Philistines who want my first born ( I have no children:) in excessive markups …. It finally starting cooling off enough over here in Phoenix .. wow! I certainly am delighted as I am certain I never photographed with any lens this great !, it does inspire us !, and not in a fanboy kind of way …
The detail, dynamic range and colors make me glad I finally started saving money a few months back as I am thinking my young wife can make the leap from iPhones up to the 343 ,, or maybe I just want one and can justify it this way …. Hold that …….
Hah! Enjoy (clearly you already do)! 😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
Leica need to give us the Q3 monochrom
Will there be a Q3 Titanium?
An interesting thought!
I'm not sure i understand the praise for the cropping modes as from what I can tell the raw file still has the full focal length. Is there any difference between the crop mode and cropping in post?
I will say this makes the recent Q review more interesting for those of us still dreaming about owning a Leica one day.
No difference.
Hugh, I bought a new M11 in silver, a Visioflex Mk 2, a Summilux 50mm F1.4 about 18 months ago ... I just have not used them (and I mean, I have not used them at all!!!) ... I will take a hit but I am thinking of trading them in for the Leica Q3 ... what do you think? I already have a Nikon Qf with lenses and also the new Sony A7RV with lenses ... and am getting very little use of those also ... I previously had a Leica M240 plus the 50mm APO sum micron and the 35MM Summilux F1.4 ... and did not use these either .. is there something wrong with me?
Q3 is far easier to shoot: AF, IBIS, IP rating…
Enjoyed this... Cheers!
So glad you did! 😊🖖🏻
I watched your vids for years. Enjoyed them. But after a while, I thought 'This is mostly about style. His delivery is quirky but really good. His vocabulary is superb. But the information is not practical to me.' I'm a demographic that Leica targets. 68, no kids. Separated. Still working. Very nice income. Lots of savings. Photography is my passion. I resisted the Q and was happy with X100 and X100S. Resisted the Q2... "I like my x100V". Enjoyed a different RUclips dude who said "Leica is jewelry for men." And smugly avoided Leica.
But the arguments presented here are persuasive enough for me to consider buying that piece of expensive jewelry.
Ummm…. Thank you? 😜😊🖖🏻
alright Hugh, you're talking me into considering this camera!
Thanks so much for this video, I always appreciate your view and words on things. Honest, articulated and objective. I especially like the words at the end about the heart and soul of a photographer, these are the things that separate the cameras and tech from what the photographer sees and executes, and this heart and soul aspect will be (is already) challenged by the new up-and-comer photographer of the world- AI. Thanks always
😊🖖🏻
I may be able to buy a Q3 soon and I really hope I can. I love my canon r5 but i want a leica q3 for reasons i don’t quite know. Maybe its because my dad and i used to look at these high end cameras and since losing him I want to honour him. Will it make me a better photographer? Probably not. But it may encourage me to go out and take more photos and get out of my comfort zone.
An homage to your father and a concretization of that homage in a Q3… well, that sounds pretty good to me. 😊🖖🏻
You are really compelling me to go get a Q3. By the way the shots were excellent. Especially the last shot looking downtown only in NY. Thanks again Hugh.
My pleasure, Thomas! 😊🖖🏻
fantastic review, how does it compare to the m11 p/
The most important point is this: the Q3 is less versatile than the M11 series, but it is far superior for anyone shooting at that focal length who needs the speed of AF because he or she has concluded that zone focusing is not the answer.
Great video, great youtube channel.
What about the quality of the prints if you use 35, 50 or 75 mm?
I usually sell 50X75cm prints. Will they be of good quality?
Also, I've tried the Q3, and I get the impression that there's a lot of distortion, which is quite unpleasant to the eye. And in the viewfinder, everything seems so far away and so small with the 28mm...
Depends on subject matter, composition and crop. 35 FOV no proble; 50 unlikely to be a peoblem; 75 or 90 may become problems, again a function of the above.
Excellent essay on the Q3, which I'm considering getting, except for the price I could get 2 or 3 very much needed lenses for my Nikon Z 6II. I wish you had shown some color photos taken with the Q3. Meanwhile, a question: Your last photo, which showed a crop of 90mm, was horizontal, whereas the uncropped photo appears to be vertical. Is it not possible to make a vertical crop?
It is possible; artistic choice. 😊🖖🏻
Hey! Congratulations on reaching 100k subscribers. BTW - I bought the Q3. It's my 65th birthday present to me. Me. Mine. Love it! I shoot on manual most of the time, but guess what? I shoot on auto sometimes, too. This camera does not judge me. It just takes great pictures.
Outstanding - and congrats for multiple reasons.