The skin tones were better in the 6700 but the f1.4 on full frame just smashes the background. Maybe a 85mm 1.8 FF vs the 56mm 1.4 APSC would be more interesting comparison. 🤔 Im on the fence about swaping from a nikon z6 to a Sony for better lens choice and better AF but cant decide on what Sony. Thanks for the tip on picking the 6400 over the 6700! I could always try a used 6400 and prime lens without breaking the bank.
The a6700 seems to have better light metering for portrait photos. I’m delighted to see that the aps-c combo was able to render many 3D pop pics. I tempt to get the Viltrox 75mm 1.2 but after watching your vid, I think I’ll go for the Sigma 56 1.4
I own the Viltrox 75mm, 27 mm and 13 mm lenses. All stellar, but the 75mm is magical. A couple of times over the year that I have owned it, the auto focus failed. It hasn't repeated that behaviour in a long time. But, for me, this lens is special. I always love when I have an opportunity to shoot with it. I also own the Sigma 56mm. A stellar lens as well,. and light and compact. I would go for the Viltrox first unless I wanted size and weight to be the main concern,. Hope this helps,.
Thanks you, I like the a7iii photos better but it was kinda expected. That being said, I went with the a6700 for the video capability, compact size and lenses prices. It really depends on what you 'll want to do with your camera really. That being said, the a6700 is still very capable in photography.
From amateur perspective, after seeing those huge lenses on FF cameras I would choose apsc (or even m34) camera today - the size factor is never considered in reviews. Now I own zv-e10 and sigma 18-50 and I consider it as best travel/all in one combo. Fits into backpack and covers most of my needs. My next camera would be zve10 2nd generation if it woudnt be not overgrown otherwise I would consider a6700 but for better price than nowadays. A73 in my opinion is great for photos and is very good value for money - but lenses are huge and expensive. Greetings!
You did your beautiful model justice. Both cameras made beautiful images. Only real difference is the depth of field but that can be ignored or overcome. The young lady's features are perfectly sharp (eye lashes, eyes, hair, clothing). I am amazed today more than before at how good Sony aps-c cameras are. No real need for big heavy and expensive gear for many jobs. The little guy does extremely well.
It's always the same. For portrait shooting offers full frame a smoother bokeh, although there are some very interesting lenses as the Viltrox 75 1.2 for aps-c now. For me as hobby photographer who shoots a lot different thinks from milky way to macro is aps-c by far the better choice because of seize, weight, costs and more reach for tele and better depth of field for macro. For portait shooting are my A6400 and Sigma 56 1.4 enough for me. It's my personal choice. Thank you for your comparison, it makes the differences clear.
in the end photographers and i myself EDIT photos anyway and clients and phone viewers wont pixel peep on a photo and just scroll away... theres a quote " a carpenter can finish other peoples house but never his home " it doesnt matter you shoot with apsc / FF or micro 4/3 as long as the client is happy with the result .. it is us Shooters that are always finding faults in our works seeking new techniques and gears to further develop our talent ... gears matters yes and so is the talent and identity of the shot , i think that what makes client go wow in their photo... i totally agree with you in this video .. more power to your channel
Always go full frame now if you can afford to do so. On every photo it was easy to tell which was full frame. It has a definitive quality filmic look. APSC has to rely on more digital processing.
Choice is now harder that ever when camera quality are pretty close to each other, the more I watch comparisons the more I am getting lost, it is so difficult to decide which camera is suitable for me now @@
I think they are pretty similar, but in the A7III I think that you have a Full frame and it’s better, I think now at the moment both have almost same prices, but personally I prefer the A7III
6:00 wow, that's crazy. I'd really be buying the a6700 to upgrade from my a6300. The software is getting a little too old, so it's a bit annoying. But I also want to go full frame because I have an 85mm full frame tamron lens
Good comparison, and very nice shots and model! In short, you can blow the bkgr easier with a full frame, and 85 1.4. But the OOC colors I think are slighly better on the a6700 (newer Sony color science). I'd try also the impressive Viltrox 75mm 1.2 on the a6700. And also, I'd upgrade the a7 III to the a7 IV, to have both the color science, menu on the a6700, and a better AF, better ergonomics, EVF etc. Plus the 33 vs 24 MP offers some room to crop, and even to sometimes use APS-C lenses on the camera, with APS-C crop.
Doesn't freeze just on Sigma, my a6700 froze with the Sony 90mm macro lens. Not a biggie, bet Sony is working on a fix. Better than having a shutter on a film camera fail.
@@charruaporelmundonot really(I probably won’t help your opinion bc I turned 18 a couple days ago), but it’s also for those who are just getting into it or for those who can’t afford a full frame!
Ridiculous. I am a professional photographer shooting Fuji and I’ve been APS-C since 2016. Shot weddings, magazine shoots, thousands of headshots on APS-C. I also shoot film. It’s about the photographer not the equipment.
Ok but....if you use a sigma F1.4 on apsc you have to use the 85 at f2.0! It's obvious we can see the difference in the bokeh! The sigma 56 F1.4 is equivalent (in bokeh) at f2.0 in full frame!
Great comparison Oliver. I think if the A6700 had the Viltrox 75mm f1.2 mounted it would give similar results to the Sigma 85 if stepped back a bit. Thou this would add more bulk and weight. I'm using the old A6000 & newer A6700 & have a couple of FF & APS-C lenses. Temped to buy the older A7iii as can be had for a great price at the mo - £999, well less than what I payed for my A6700. Love the feel of the A7iii in the hand far less bulky that the A7iv. BUT do i really need another camera 🤣For someone starting out - would be worth popping down a camera store and checking both models & weighing up the pros & cons. As both great cameras. 👍
@olivershutterspeed I am from Ethiopia, and I love the content you posted recently. You always show us it is possible to get great images from budget cameras. I do have a Sony A7c with an APSC 18-105 F4 lens, but I couldn't produce an image that has a similar quality to you. Additionally, I saw the recent images you took with a gear like a6000 have really a different quality as compared to the previous images taken with the same gear.what is the reason behind?
The A7C is a full frame sensor, and is the same sensor as the a7III. I have the 18-105 F4. It's an APSC lens, as you mention, and it's not the the sharpest lens, so it's not going to look that great, and if you use it on the A7C in crop mode, you're only going to be using half the megapixels, which means 12 megapixels, since the a7c has a 24 megapixel sensor, so in other words, it's going to look even worse than it would on an a6000, which has a 24 megapixel sensor, but it will be able to use all 24 megapixels.
if ur gonna use the lenses for photography then u should have 16 135 but if youre gonna use it for video u should get something like 24 70 and that would be better for photos too
I don't give a damn about bokeh. Frankly, I can't really understand why people want to pay more money to get blurrier backgrounds. Yes, I get it. Subject separation, popping, etc. But seriously, you're talking about paying more money for blurrier backgrounds... But what I am really, REALLY concerned about is sharpness and image quality. I keep looking at pixel noise, and although I see some additional noise on the APSC images when really zoomed in, I also look at the size and weight of the lenses, and imagine not wanting to carry them around with me. If the best camera is the one you have with you, then I'd rather de-noise a little bit of noise in post, and buy more, lighter and cheaper lenses with an a6700, than carry bulkier, more expensive lenses around.
Yes and no.....they will never be able to tell if it is shot on FF or APSC unless you show them two photos to compare and, in many cases, tell them what the differences are. And I definitely think you too will not be able to tell if there is no photos shown side by side. There are many great APSC lenses these days to do portraits like the Viltrox 75mm F1.2 or the Sigma 56mm F1.4 and the background is gonna be super blurry to the point people would not even care anymore if it is APSC or FF.
Plus the blurrier background, due to sensor size, can be achieved by moving yourself back with your APSC camera, so that you have the subject occupying the same amount in the photo than it does in the full frame one. Aka, you get the same blurry background if you go further back to account for the fact that APSC has a 1.6/1.5 "zoom" effect. When comparing both subjects at the same size, and literally the same photo, the blur is the same (assuming the same aperture has been used, not the equivalent one between APSC and FF).
you like fullframe... till medium format is more reachable/cheaper right? so your descision is not based on the look. your indsutrie bias is stronger than rational thinking :)
Hello Sir, I am Inclined towards buying Sony A6700 i am confused between the lens wether to get 16-50 mm Power zoom lens or 18-135 mm zoom lens, it has an roughly 240 USD price difference in India, mostly in want to use it for Landscape, Portraits indoor and outdoor & Events.
Both have image stabilization, but the a6700 has gyroscopic stabilization as well. The use of APS-C lenses is where the savings are in lenses. I am wondering how the a6700 would perform in the extremes. I think it gets down to what you are using it for. The a6700 has much better video options including breathing compensation with select Sony lenses, 120fps 4K, and 10bit 422 color sampling and focus bracketing for macro work. It is about low light that you might get some better lower noise on the a7 iii. And the dual as card slots for backups or extra storage. Also a vertical grip can be used with the a7 iii for double battery life.
The a6700 has better autofocus and you'll already have lenses for it. It's lighter and has really similar quality. If you care about video, the a6700 is WAY better than the a7iii. If only photos, they're comparable, but the a6700 has better autofocus, and the new and improved software.
Came from a6400 to the a7iii, a6400 felt it focuses better but I never regretted my decision since I used to limit my iso on the a6400 since I find it noisy above 3k iso, with the a7iii I can even go as far as 20k iso with comparable noise to the 3k iso on the a6400. Now I just do auto iso on a7iii
I am considering buying the A6700. I came from a A6000. I watched a video from a guy shooting with the A6700 @ iso 8000. No noise at all. But i think that was after processing. It was a very clear image
No, A7iii sensor is 24.2MP while A6700 is 26MP. You will not notice any differences. I have A6700 and I have borrowed A7iii from a friend to try. I can't see any difference even when zoomed in to pixel peeping. It all depends on the lens rather than the sensor when the MP counts on both are similar. If anything, the color on A6700 is noticeably better straight out of camera due to the newer color science but this is not very relevant anyway if you do post processing.
No he has to use the 85 at f2! Cause is the equivalent in bokeh to the sigma 56 F1.4. it's obvious if you have a crop sensor you can't have the same bokeh of you use the same F1.4 aperture.
I didn't get it, you. are comparing two different body and two different lenses... What the sense of this action? I mean, if you will compare two same bodies and different lenses it will have sense or same lens, but two different body. How can I understand?
Here is more SONY a6700 Content! -> ruclips.net/video/y2QqB3XZwpA/видео.html
You need Viltrox 75mm f1.2 for α6700 - it's on another level when you compare it to Sigma 56mm f1.4. With Viltrox you don't need big Full Frame camera
The skin tones were better in the 6700 but the f1.4 on full frame just smashes the background. Maybe a 85mm 1.8 FF vs the 56mm 1.4 APSC would be more interesting comparison. 🤔
Im on the fence about swaping from a nikon z6 to a Sony for better lens choice and better AF but cant decide on what Sony. Thanks for the tip on picking the 6400 over the 6700! I could always try a used 6400 and prime lens without breaking the bank.
Yes on a6700 it works as f2.8 not as f 1.8 due its crop factor
The a6700 seems to have better light metering for portrait photos. I’m delighted to see that the aps-c combo was able to render many 3D pop pics. I tempt to get the Viltrox 75mm 1.2 but after watching your vid, I think I’ll go for the Sigma 56 1.4
I own the Viltrox 75mm, 27 mm and 13 mm lenses. All stellar, but the 75mm is magical. A couple of times over the year that I have owned it, the auto focus failed. It hasn't repeated that behaviour in a long time. But, for me, this lens is special. I always love when I have an opportunity to shoot with it. I also own the Sigma 56mm. A stellar lens as well,. and light and compact. I would go for the Viltrox first unless I wanted size and weight to be the main concern,. Hope this helps,.
Thanks you, I like the a7iii photos better but it was kinda expected. That being said, I went with the a6700 for the video capability, compact size and lenses prices. It really depends on what you 'll want to do with your camera really. That being said, the a6700 is still very capable in photography.
From amateur perspective, after seeing those huge lenses on FF cameras I would choose apsc (or even m34) camera today - the size factor is never considered in reviews.
Now I own zv-e10 and sigma 18-50 and I consider it as best travel/all in one combo. Fits into backpack and covers most of my needs.
My next camera would be zve10 2nd generation if it woudnt be not overgrown otherwise I would consider a6700 but for better price than nowadays. A73 in my opinion is great for photos and is very good value for money - but lenses are huge and expensive.
Greetings!
Your low light test is pretty bright, i whis to see the a6700 in really lowlight situations
I'm thinking about buying the Ricoh GR IIIX for snapshot portraits. Because it's so small, you always have a camera with you
Ricoh isnot for portraits , its more for street photography
Your phone is always with you
You did your beautiful model justice. Both cameras made beautiful images. Only real difference is the depth of field but that can be ignored or overcome. The young lady's features are perfectly sharp (eye lashes, eyes, hair, clothing). I am amazed today more than before at how good Sony aps-c cameras are. No real need for big heavy and expensive gear for many jobs. The little guy does extremely well.
I have to rewatch this on a big screen. On the phone I didn't have a preference.
Let me know which one did you like most!
@@olivershutterspeed Will do Oliver
@@BarryJohnson Thank you Barry!
It's always the same. For portrait shooting offers full frame a smoother bokeh, although there are some very interesting lenses as the Viltrox 75 1.2 for aps-c now. For me as hobby photographer who shoots a lot different thinks from milky way to macro is aps-c by far the better choice because of seize, weight, costs and more reach for tele and better depth of field for macro. For portait shooting are my A6400 and Sigma 56 1.4 enough for me. It's my personal choice. Thank you for your comparison, it makes the differences clear.
in the end photographers and i myself EDIT photos anyway and clients and phone viewers wont pixel peep on a photo and just scroll away... theres a quote " a carpenter can finish other peoples house but never his home " it doesnt matter you shoot with apsc / FF or micro 4/3 as long as the client is happy with the result .. it is us Shooters that are always finding faults in our works seeking new techniques and gears to further develop our talent ... gears matters yes and so is the talent and identity of the shot , i think that what makes client go wow in their photo... i totally agree with you in this video .. more power to your channel
Always go full frame now if you can afford to do so. On every photo it was easy to tell which was full frame. It has a definitive quality filmic look. APSC has to rely on more digital processing.
Bokeh is just magnificent with the full frame one
Were those straight out of camera jpegs or did you color grade at all.
Yes all JPEGS! hope you enjoyed it. what camera do you use?
@@olivershutterspeed currently using the ZV E10. Will be purchasing the A6700 on the 26th.
@@olivershutterspeed Skin tone rendered by the a6700 was better than the a7iii, @1:30
I guess all correctly, rn im about to buy the a7iii 2nd hand, and purchase the a6700 using credit card. An upgrade for my a6500 and a7ii
Buy an a7iv and replace both
Hope you like it!
@@tnproduction7674 i really have to review sony a7iv soon!
I’m going to use my A6700 with Sigma 56mm for the foreseeable future. Maybe one day I’ll get an A7Cr. 🤷♂️
Choice is now harder that ever when camera quality are pretty close to each other, the more I watch comparisons the more I am getting lost, it is so difficult to decide which camera is suitable for me now @@
I think they are pretty similar, but in the A7III I think that you have a Full frame and it’s better, I think now at the moment both have almost same prices, but personally I prefer the A7III
6:00 wow, that's crazy. I'd really be buying the a6700 to upgrade from my a6300. The software is getting a little too old, so it's a bit annoying. But I also want to go full frame because I have an 85mm full frame tamron lens
Good comparison, and very nice shots and model!
In short, you can blow the bkgr easier with a full frame, and 85 1.4. But the OOC colors I think are slighly better on the a6700 (newer Sony color science).
I'd try also the impressive Viltrox 75mm 1.2 on the a6700. And also, I'd upgrade the a7 III to the a7 IV, to have both the color science, menu on the a6700, and a better AF, better ergonomics, EVF etc. Plus the 33 vs 24 MP offers some room to crop, and even to sometimes use APS-C lenses on the camera, with APS-C crop.
did you find bug or freeze on a6700 when paired with sigma 56mm f1.4?
it worked really good together! but no real difference to apsc sony a6000
Doesn't freeze just on Sigma, my a6700 froze with the Sony 90mm macro lens. Not a biggie, bet Sony is working on a fix. Better than having a shutter on a film camera fail.
Yes and it is the lens fault. Update your firmware on your Sigma lenses.
Can u also do same videos with canon r6 mii
Thanks i will save a little and go for full frame
The perfect video i was looking for. Thanks so much🙏
Sony sponsored video 😂. A6700 is a great camera, but Sony still thinks aps-c line is for kids.
It is.
@@charruaporelmundonot really(I probably won’t help your opinion bc I turned 18 a couple days ago), but it’s also for those who are just getting into it or for those who can’t afford a full frame!
Ridiculous. I am a professional photographer shooting Fuji and I’ve been APS-C since 2016. Shot weddings, magazine shoots, thousands of headshots on APS-C. I also shoot film. It’s about the photographer not the equipment.
Ok but....if you use a sigma F1.4 on apsc you have to use the 85 at f2.0! It's obvious we can see the difference in the bokeh! The sigma 56 F1.4 is equivalent (in bokeh) at f2.0 in full frame!
Sigma 56mm f1,4 is nice lense.
Great comparison Oliver. I think if the A6700 had the Viltrox 75mm f1.2 mounted it would give similar results to the Sigma 85 if stepped back a bit. Thou this would add more bulk and weight. I'm using the old A6000 & newer A6700 & have a couple of FF & APS-C lenses. Temped to buy the older A7iii as can be had for a great price at the mo - £999, well less than what I payed for my A6700. Love the feel of the A7iii in the hand far less bulky that the A7iv. BUT do i really need another camera 🤣For someone starting out - would be worth popping down a camera store and checking both models & weighing up the pros & cons. As both great cameras. 👍
QUESTION: When shooting the slow motion with the a7III what fps did you shoot with before slowing it down to 60 fps in this video?
Were you using any light reflectors?
Which one would you prefer between A6700 and A7C? They cost pretty much the same.
Go Sony a6700! and get the sigma 56mm :)
I would also choose the a6700 @@olivershutterspeed
shouldn't you use the same lens for a good side by side comparison?
No, due to different sensor size.
If I own the Sony A6400 and the Sigma 16 30 and sony 50 OSS. Do you think changing the body good
@olivershutterspeed I am from Ethiopia, and I love the content you posted recently. You always show us it is possible to get great images from budget cameras. I do have a Sony A7c with an APSC 18-105 F4 lens, but I couldn't produce an image that has a similar quality to you. Additionally, I saw the recent images you took with a gear like a6000 have really a different quality as compared to the previous images taken with the same gear.what is the reason behind?
18-105 is apsc, a7c is full frame
The A7C is a full frame sensor, and is the same sensor as the a7III. I have the 18-105 F4. It's an APSC lens, as you mention, and it's not the the sharpest lens, so it's not going to look that great, and if you use it on the A7C in crop mode, you're only going to be using half the megapixels, which means 12 megapixels, since the a7c has a 24 megapixel sensor, so in other words, it's going to look even worse than it would on an a6000, which has a 24 megapixel sensor, but it will be able to use all 24 megapixels.
What about the color science
6700 is better, in autofocus, 10 bits color depth, but I’ll always prefer full frame over aps c
Very excellent work, I have a6700 with Sony 35mm oss and Sony 16-135, please advise which lens should I out and which one in. Thanks.
if ur gonna use the lenses for photography then u should have 16 135 but if youre gonna use it for video u should get something like 24 70 and that would be better for photos too
Man great video, can u make more video a73 with different lenses?
Sigma 56 colour was awesome
I don't give a damn about bokeh. Frankly, I can't really understand why people want to pay more money to get blurrier backgrounds. Yes, I get it. Subject separation, popping, etc. But seriously, you're talking about paying more money for blurrier backgrounds... But what I am really, REALLY concerned about is sharpness and image quality. I keep looking at pixel noise, and although I see some additional noise on the APSC images when really zoomed in, I also look at the size and weight of the lenses, and imagine not wanting to carry them around with me. If the best camera is the one you have with you, then I'd rather de-noise a little bit of noise in post, and buy more, lighter and cheaper lenses with an a6700, than carry bulkier, more expensive lenses around.
because that's what clients want
Yes and no.....they will never be able to tell if it is shot on FF or APSC unless you show them two photos to compare and, in many cases, tell them what the differences are. And I definitely think you too will not be able to tell if there is no photos shown side by side. There are many great APSC lenses these days to do portraits like the Viltrox 75mm F1.2 or the Sigma 56mm F1.4 and the background is gonna be super blurry to the point people would not even care anymore if it is APSC or FF.
Plus the blurrier background, due to sensor size, can be achieved by moving yourself back with your APSC camera, so that you have the subject occupying the same amount in the photo than it does in the full frame one. Aka, you get the same blurry background if you go further back to account for the fact that APSC has a 1.6/1.5 "zoom" effect. When comparing both subjects at the same size, and literally the same photo, the blur is the same (assuming the same aperture has been used, not the equivalent one between APSC and FF).
you like fullframe... till medium format is more reachable/cheaper right?
so your descision is not based on the look. your indsutrie bias is stronger than rational thinking :)
85mm renders much more beautifully
Leider kann ich nur ein wenig Englisch, aber ich finde die Bilder der A6700 mindestens gleichwertig Grüße aus Deutschland
Danke für deinen tollen kommentar habe mich sehr gefreut!
the a 6700 photos look better, dude.
Hello Sir,
I am Inclined towards buying Sony A6700 i am confused between the lens wether to get 16-50 mm Power zoom lens or 18-135 mm zoom lens, it has an roughly 240 USD price difference in India, mostly in want to use it for Landscape, Portraits indoor and outdoor & Events.
Sigma 18-50 2.8 lo best. 40-45k around
Thank you Oliver! informative and helpful comparative video, Good luck!
a6700 has internal image stabilization which allows for use of cheaper lenses
Both have image stabilization, but the a6700 has gyroscopic stabilization as well. The use of APS-C lenses is where the savings are in lenses. I am wondering how the a6700 would perform in the extremes. I think it gets down to what you are using it for. The a6700 has much better video options including breathing compensation with select Sony lenses, 120fps 4K, and 10bit 422 color sampling and focus bracketing for macro work. It is about low light that you might get some better lower noise on the a7 iii. And the dual as card slots for backups or extra storage. Also a vertical grip can be used with the a7 iii for double battery life.
a6700 for videos a7 III for pictures
bro didnt get a dog to get the girls
he got a camera to rake in the girls lmao
(buys camera)
we want to see the iSO battle and sharpness battle..we all know DOF on full frame gonna win..you should more focus on iSO & sharpness bro
Yess thank you farhan! :D
Currently have the a6400, considering upgrading to the a6700 or going full frame and getting the a7iii, any recommendations?
The a6700 has better autofocus and you'll already have lenses for it. It's lighter and has really similar quality. If you care about video, the a6700 is WAY better than the a7iii. If only photos, they're comparable, but the a6700 has better autofocus, and the new and improved software.
Came from a6400 to the a7iii, a6400 felt it focuses better but I never regretted my decision since I used to limit my iso on the a6400 since I find it noisy above 3k iso, with the a7iii I can even go as far as 20k iso with comparable noise to the 3k iso on the a6400. Now I just do auto iso on a7iii
I am considering buying the A6700. I came from a A6000. I watched a video from a guy shooting with the A6700 @ iso 8000. No noise at all. But i think that was after processing. It was a very clear image
@@driesovic Because these days AI denoise apps like Topaz makes low light / high ISO noise issue quite irrelevant with just a few clicks.
My dream camera ❤❤❤
At the same price in my country i think we are gonna buy the a7iii
Yeah Both are good enough for Photos. but the big difference is the video
Unfortunately, my salary is still small in Indonesia and I can't afford to buy this camera😢
Music nice and nice model but test didn't test AF
Through this video the a6700 always brighter
56 vs 85? Of course bokeh makes so much difference
A7 III is 6 years old, can it last another 6 years when you buy one today?
No. Buy a7c ii
Does a7iii capture sharper and more detailed photos compare to a6700
No, A7iii sensor is 24.2MP while A6700 is 26MP. You will not notice any differences. I have A6700 and I have borrowed A7iii from a friend to try. I can't see any difference even when zoomed in to pixel peeping. It all depends on the lens rather than the sensor when the MP counts on both are similar. If anything, the color on A6700 is noticeably better straight out of camera due to the newer color science but this is not very relevant anyway if you do post processing.
photos without processing?
Hello, please advise which is better to buy Sony A7III or Sony A 6700 ?????? 🙏🙏🙏
What kind of comparison is this ?? You should have used the same lens on both camera smart fam
No he has to use the 85 at f2! Cause is the equivalent in bokeh to the sigma 56 F1.4. it's obvious if you have a crop sensor you can't have the same bokeh of you use the same F1.4 aperture.
Full frame camera always win in bokeh
This is the why files song
A7iii or A7iv ?
It's wrote in every single clip A7 iii!
I didn't get it, you. are comparing two different body and two different lenses... What the sense of this action? I mean, if you will compare two same bodies and different lenses it will have sense or same lens, but two different body. How can I understand?
Lol all apsc have 1.5 crop sensor except canon(1.6) so the actual focal length of the a6700 84 mm which is 1mm shorter than the other
a7 iii is better
The modell 🫣🤩😍😍
She is so pretty and cute
Заморозил всю муру😔
Let's Talk about the Camera later.
Where's the Link for the Girl?