Geoff Tate & Michael Kiske - LIVE comparison (80's)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- A Live vocal comparison between Geoff Tate (Queensryche) and Michael Kiske (ex-Helloween, Place Vendome) (1985-1991):
00:06 The Lady Wore Black (1985) - 00:39 We Got The Right (1988)
01:14 The Lady Wore Black (1985) - 01:22 We Got The Right (1988)
01:32 Queen Of The Ryche (1985) - 01:40 We Got The Right (1988)
01:51 Child Of Fire (1985) - 01:59 Future World (1988)
02:08 Take Hold Of The Flame (1985) - 02:18 Keeper Of The Seven Keys (1989)
02:28 Take Hold Of The Flame (1985) - 02:33 We Got The Right (1988)
02:40 Eyes Of A Stranger (1991) - 02:49 I Want Out (1988)
03:00 Child Of Fire (1985) - 03:08 Future World (1989)
03:17 Child Of Fire (1985) - 03:41 We Got The Right (1988)
04:08 Blinded (1985) - 04:19 Future World (1988)
04:30 Take Hold Of The Flame (1985) - 04:39 A Tale That Wasn't Right (1989)
04:53 Prophecy (1985) - 05:01 Halloween (1987)
05:11 Blinded (1985) - 05:18 How Many Tears (1988)
05:26 Prophecy (1985) - 05:40 Twilight Of The Gods (1987)
05:56 Warning (1985) - 06:07 How Many Tears (1989)
(Almost all the Kiske samples are taken from bootlegs)
Two monsters but Geoff tate is the best and the strongest voice of the world!
Geoff Tate all day.
✌🏼
Geoff Tate is so much more intune on every single note than the other guy. One of my favourite vocalists of all time for sure.
"The other guy" don't you know Helloween?
The other guy 😂 if you don't know him how can you compare?
@@pragadoegito Because I watched and listened to this video comparing them.
@@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE oh after these years, i still dont know who the fuk are you. Guess you just that others kid who will never achieve anything other than your a good boy from your momma LoL
They are very similar...but Tate is Tate.
Both great. Kiske took better care of himself over the years. Huge Maiden fan and I love Bruce but both are better.
But Bruce still with his hair 😎
Much love to kiske but Tate in his prime was untouchable. So much richness and power. To bad he destroyed his voice.
Highs are kiske realm. None can play in his shining skies.
kiskeeeeeeeeeee.... hail from greece!!!!!
Two of the greatests!!!!
Tate é mais afinado e tem um controle melhor, mas o Kiske manteve a qualidade da voz ao longo dos anos, até por que nem é tanto a idade o que desgasta a voz, mas o excesso de uso, e o Tate fez muito mais turnês que o Kiske. Gosto mais do Tate pelo timbre e interpretação.
These 2 have the most similar voices.. From lower range to high.. They couldve switched bands and not much difference.. Love them both!!!!!!
you're close but naaaaaaaa you can hear a distinct difference indeed
@@anthonysaponaro6318 when I heard Hellloween I was like Geoff? Lol to me very similar..dude not exact but seriously could've sang for each other's band .
@@Deft1-007 very close , thats for sure
Kiske el rey por excelencia 🤴
na
Yo pensaba lo mismo hasta que escuche a Queensryche.
HOLY CRAP!! i say that because these guys were my favorite and i thought these were THE best rock singers when i was a kid( and Sebastion Bach though he had a different style). Both had such similar range and tone that they both got a 100% on the "test"-essentially a tie. It all depends on which melodies you liked more. "I want out" was my favorite Helloween tune, "Eyes of a stranger" my Queensryche although i liked more of their tunes overall. The "Mindcrime" album was a masterpiece!
Soy fan de ambos pero para mi Geoff Tate es el mas grande vocalista heavy de todos los tiempos aunque hoy por hoy haya perdido voz me sigue impresionando , kiske tiene una mejor tecnica y un registro mas alto que geoff , gran profesional pero no le perdono haber dejado helloween sus discos con ellos son epicos , tremendas joyas menos chamaleon que no me gustó. Les siguen a estos 2 Rob halford , Bruce dickinson y el gran Ronnie James Dio , mencion especial para Klaus Meine de Scorpions, gran vocalista pero injustamente ignorado en los foros de mejores vocalistas heavy.
los mencionados quedarían en este orden tomando en cuenta registro, técnica y claro Performance
Ronnie James Dio (Técnica una bestia, gran registro y un performance extraordinario, nunca quedó mal en vivo, ni de mas viejo)
2 Rob Halford (gran registro, exelente técnica, y en vivo una bestia aunque la edad le quitó los agudos)
Geoff Tate (gran registro, excelente técnica y muy buen performance)
Bruce Dickinson (buen registro, buena técnica pero nunca pudo con los agudos en vivo)
Michael Kiske (gran registro, buena técnica pero en vivo ni el vibrato podía mantener y variaba la velocidad)
You’d need to listen to full live song performances in order to make an assessment, not just small excerpts. Having done that, I can say Tate had better vocal technique. Who you like more is another story.
Tate is more complete and more on it , very close to the record in each note that are more variety.
KISKE RULES!!!!!
Love both, they are in the best 5 overall the world. With love from turkey
These guys are both incredible but Geoff Tate is the best metal singer ever. So sorry, Mike but not this time...
Mike is a German with a very good English accent and superb range. Both have similar style. But Tate's queen of the ryche came first. But I love Kiske.
Kiske 👍
Tate ....
80/90's ? GEOFF -> ALL
80s Tate >> Kiske
90s Kiske >> abism >> Tate
00 Kiske >> Abism >> Sick Kiske >> Tate
@@luiscarlosbmonteiro8619 Muy de acuerdo. Para mí Geoff en los 80's era inalcanzable, una lastima que a principios de los 90's su voz se apagara, justo cuando la banda empezó a tener su auge de éxito mundial. Aun así tuvo muy buenas actuaciones como el Unplugged del 92.
Sin duda el pionero en un estilo de canto que influenció a cantantes posteriores como Kiske, Midnight, André Matos, LaBrie...
both are great, but kiske is kiske :)
i hate tate's last behaivors but his voice has greater than kiske or halford or bruce in his prime
It is hard to give vibrato in a very high pitch and it is Kiske whose voice is truly natural and powerful in a every high tone even his low tone is very clean & soft. Kiske is Best.
Kiske tem mais identidade pra mim, tem a voz mais bonita e natural.
Tie.... only difference is Tate was around before Kiskie because Helloween wanted a singer like Queensryche.....
Geoff Tate, no comparison.. Helloween just didn't have the songs.
Both great but Kiske wins if only for his longevity.
i'd say Kiske, just personal like, they are all at the peak of quality and talent. Their voices are incredibly similar tho.
Kiske of course!!
Geoff is a bit more nuanced. But Kiske has held up better over time. Both can do the highs equally well. I prefer geoffs lows a bit more.
Both were greats in the 80's,but nowadays Kiske is too much better!Tate lost his high notes and Kiske don't.
nice...
queensryche songs requires more efforts and tate's tone miles of better than kiske's
@antereiiii thank you!
Dois caras fodas pra carai!!!!!!
Geoff tem a voz mais bonita, além disso canta notas super agudas com muita facilidade e sonoridade!
Tate in his prime was far better than Kiske, but nowadays...
Kiske mejoró la técnica de Tate..... Me chiflan los dos....
where did you find the last epic scream on how many tears? cant find it anywhere
Tienen un timbre muy parecido
@antereiiii do you know where i can download that album?
Michael Kiske can still sing like this nowadays... Geoff Tate can't hit those notes anymore
When I firstly listen to Helloween with Kiske (Keeper I) it was like - "#@ck! This is total Tate rip off voice, man".
KISKE FROM FAR IS THE BEST
Get checked your ears
No way
kiske is better
Draw
David Byron is better