Kiske is very good, but I don't think anyone can beat Geoff's expression, tone, vibrato, phrasing, power, intensity, and charisma! Granted he's not a young man anymore, but that doesn't take anything away from what he could do at his peak.. I think all comparisons should be made of artists during their prime.
James Redding I think he wins easily for the passion in his voice. That's the most important thing for me, considering that both are gods, but Tate was just better.
Two of the most amazing voices to ever grace the metal scene. My personal favorite is Geoff in the QR EP & The Warning, but Kiske did some absolutely insane things in his days with Halloween. Thanks for the video!
I think Gef Tate’s voice is more clear and has core strength from low to high range tone. Because he seems like he know how to deliver clear vocal sound without causing any conflicting in the throat. Most vocalists struggle in live concerts, but Gef Tate’s voice is stay same or even sound stronger. He has unusual strong voice with vocal technique.
Kiske's high notes sound fuller but in the lower range Kiske's voice is sweet while Tate's is more dramatic. Now Geoff Tate has lost his voice while Kiske still sounds the same.
@@1francosvizzero I'll try to find new videos of him. Last time I saw him he sounded awful and had a backup female singer so it would sound like he was reaching the high notes even though it was the back up singer doing most the work. Are you sure it's not a back up singer making him sound good?
I do not believe I have ever seen someone do such a great job at showing comparisons. Many of the examples are in the same key and hitting the same notes. Bravo, man. Really well done!
Tate, Arch and Jeff Scott Soto in the 80's were the absolute pinnacle of (power) metal singing. No one - not even Halford and Dickinson could rival them in range, power, control and technique.
Well, considering Dickinson's sick voice range in Run to the Hills, I consider that Geoff, Dickinson, Arch, LaBrie and Dio are the best metal voices ever. I know Halford it's a God too, but he would get the 6th place for me.
I have to throw in Tony Harnell into that bag too. But about the Tate - Kiske comparison, what makes Tate stand out is his intonation and lower range. Kiske got the range, but the way he sings is... flatter.
I read an interview long ago with Michael about vocal influences: He was actually trying to sing like Geoff because he's a fan. I grew up as a younger teenager with both Queensryche and Helloween and they were simply original and awesome in their prime.
And the winner for best singer in the world forever is................... GEOFF TATE!!!!!!!!!!! By an overwhelming majority vote! Thank you and goodnight!
Could we notice the difference if Geoff recorded a classic Kiske song with Helloween, and Kiske a classic Tate song with Queensryche? Damn, they sound like vocal twins!
No way. Go listen to Queensryche's London or any song with emotion and that type of specific phrasing. I really like Kiske, but he sings technique without much emotion and lacks dynamic phrasing.
@@bryanwhite5766 No, Geoff uses all of his registers. The main difference is Kiske is a technical singer, where Geoff uses both technical skill and phrasing to evoke emotion.
Just coming to say a big THANK YOU for the big work here. Great compilation, difficult as well to pick the proper cuts on the songs, same vocal tones, etc. THANKS.
They are very similar to each other, they have the same tone and range (many people says in the comment that Tate is a baritone and Kiske a tenor but it's not true, they are the same, between baritone and tenor, 70% of the male population are between baritone and tenor, the difference is that Tate was a heavy smoker and his speaking voice sounds more deep, but is not lower than Kiske) for me Kiske has a more pleasent tone, very beautiful on the lower register, and less..."unique" on the high notes. But for me Geoff is a legend, a very very very unique singer and performer, iconic in every way. And the cool thing is that his recent live performances are unbelievably good.
NOBODY HAS DEMONSTRATED THERE VOCAL RANGE BETTER THAN "GEOFF TATE" QUEEN OF THE REICH,TAKE HOLD OF THE FLAME,LADY WHORE BLACK, ROADS TO MADNESS. GEOFF TATE BECAME A LEGEND ON QUEENSRYCHE ,THE DEMO .THE WARNING THERE 1ST STUDIO ALBUM IS A LEGENDARY.
Both phenomenal. But it' Tate for me. He can match tecnique and emotion, he's better on low range (cause he is a baritone, unreal baritone but anyway a baritone). Anyway pick the one you prefer, you'll never go wrong.
Dom kaneki pretty sure kiske is a baritone as well. Not as low as Tate obviously, but he doesn’t have that typical tenor ring in his mid range like a Bruce Dickinson or Dio would have.
@@jayhay8 what typical tenor ring? They sing in that metal twang/edgy/ mix voice, they don’t use full voice. Kiske is a tenor, Geof is a baritone, Kiske has superiority in all ways in higher register naturally, but he kinda use more baritonish approach for some reason. Baritone can not connect chest above g4, tenor can up to say E5. I like Geofs singing and music, but there is nothing impressive absout his thin, no chest highs. Everyone can sing like that
@@macakucizmama831 Kiske’s voice was thinner though. Neither of them use true chest voice, especially as they go higher in range. But Tate’s voice throughout has more body than Kiske.
Both Great but in the end its simply a matter of Taste and its Geoff Tate for me. love the tone and vibrato flows, the transitions in and out of the diffrent voices are smoother. again,, thats just a personal opinion from personal taste.
Soy fanatico de kiske..pero hay que reconocer que geoff tate en los 80 era un moustro..mucho mas completo que kiske..contolaba su voz como queria..por algo es el numero 13 de los mejores vocalistas de rock de todos los tiempos....alemanes los dos geoff tate y kiske...grandes entre grandes...viva el rock
At high register both Geoff Tate and Michael Kiske sound almost identical or have just about the same rabge, but on low register Geoff Tate sounds darker and more pleasent IMO. I prefer Geoff Tate in his prime, but like I said both at high register sound almost identical.
I listened to Helloween/Queensryche equally in the 80's/90's...it's a DRAW for me, as far as vocals go. Geoff has a smoother, sultrier low register. But Michael is there with him on the higher register. I mean, both of these guys could sing their arses off.
I think Kiske has set the benchmark for Power Metal lead vocals and has a very distinctive wide vibrato. Tate sounds more musical to me, especially in the lower as he's a Baritone (or fake bariton, shall we call it...), and overall I think he's a bit superior technics-wise. But those were the good old days, now they both are very different singers than before, even though i still love them today.
@@rafaeljannotti3002 I mean, he's a Baritone with extended range. Often called fake baritones, as they can sing as high as tenors, and as low as baritones, without (almost) any noticeable difference, almost effortlessly.
I kinda of stayed away from helloween. I initially saw them in a lower light. But thanks to this video I now have something else to explore. Thanks. I'm still team tate, he is a master. He has better control thru all octaves.
They are both my favorites. I heard Kiske first when i was very young and at that time nothing could be better than him in my world. However, as i've grown i relate more to Tate's person. Maybe QR and Tate is more mature, smart and adult oriented, while Helloween and Kiske is more funny and gives a positive hype.
Kiske: "Geoff Tate is technically probably the best Metal vocalist around. But I must say that I only liked him very much when I was younger. The older I got the more I found him sort of clinical and unreal. Technic is important when you start off, but it needs more to tell the story. I learned a lot from him like I did from Bruce Dickinson, Robert Halfort, Ronnie James Dio or Elvis Presley, but now I do my own stuff."
Tate used alot of studio shit to enhance his power. Otherwise he ain't nothing. Watch Dios "Stars" recordings without effects. Tate was terrible until they put effects on it.
Prefer Ray Alder of Fates Warning to both personally but Geoff was the creator of this whole thing...yes, Halford, Mercury, Perry, Gillan but Geoff married opera & vocal gymnastics like nobody before i'd heard
Well Kiske is just amazing, a God. But I prefer Tatte because he was the MAN back then, a complete BEAST. Queensryche is one of my fav bands ever and Geoff's voice was just insane. I couldn't imagine any other '80s band like Queensryche without him.
Dont know about Tate... but kiske was still a teen when recruited by hansen... funny how at such young age he had such a powerful diaphragm and voice... and today all my fellow vocalist sing like beiber
Kiske is good, is close but Tate is better not only in power even the other is close but also in color, in clarity, in emotion well express. Tate was the best at that time not only becaus of the power but for the melody in the voice, the color, the emotion all bombined. That is why it is very hard to keep a voice like that when you become older. Many many song need that vocal to be in good shape.. even in texture. There is not only high pîtch but middle in texture and way down and than come back , etc... etc... Many songs need performance. He was my favorite becaus he was the most complete with a clear voice. Many had power but not a beautiful voice like him.
I can die happy, when I hear Tate singing " I want out ", and Kiske singing " Queen of the Reich ".Unfortunately, this is not likely to happen, especially nowadays, when both singers are not what they were long ago.
Thereal Chromaggus I did see and listen Kiske live @ Kavarna Rock Festival, 29.06.2015, and his vibratto when singing I want out is not the same, he has lost much of it, and now he sounds thin.But hey, Kiske having a concert 70 km away from home - I am one lucky man !!!
Dois vocalistas maravilhosos , gosto um pouco mais do tate mas o kiske é um monstro Tb, e os dois tem estilos parecidos de cantar, porém o. Kiske conservou melhor a voz, mas nós anos 80 tate era o melhor vocalista, o que ele cantou do The warning até o operation é algo sem comparação
Man this is a tough one for me because they are my two favorite singers ever period!! I think if I had to choose I would go with Kiske only because the very first time I heard him sing even my dog looked at me in disbelief 😜
Acredito que o que kiske teve de influência de Tate ficou nos keepers I e II principal e mais claramente no keepers I. Do PBGA em diante, inclusive em sua carreira solo, kiske obteve a sua identidade vocal. Ao meu ver, o timbre do kiske é um dos mais encorpados e claros em notas altíssimas, no heavy metal em geral.
SadDadDancer Prophecy was RE-recorded during Rage; it was first recorded around Warning, and was on the Decline of Western Civilization soundtrack (but the version on this vid is the Rage version, so yeah)
Kiske is very good, but I don't think anyone can beat Geoff's expression, tone, vibrato, phrasing, power, intensity, and charisma!
Granted he's not a young man anymore, but that doesn't take anything away from what he could do at his peak..
I think all comparisons should be made of artists during their prime.
Kiske voice is very beautiful
Tates voice with the low notes at the beginning of the mission chill to the bone. His lows shake my speakers like bass does.. outstanding
James Redding I think he wins easily for the passion in his voice. That's the most important thing for me, considering that both are gods, but Tate was just better.
Geoff rules!!!
Two of the most amazing voices to ever grace the metal scene. My personal favorite is Geoff in the QR EP & The Warning, but Kiske did some absolutely insane things in his days with Halloween. Thanks for the video!
I think Gef Tate’s voice is more clear and has core strength from low to high range tone. Because he seems like he know how to deliver clear vocal sound without causing any conflicting in the throat. Most vocalists struggle in live concerts, but Gef Tate’s voice is stay same or even sound stronger. He has unusual strong voice with vocal technique.
kiske perfect vocal Forever!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hell yeah
Geoff tate sounds more creative and darker but soothing with his voice but kiske has a beautiful sweet voice with great helloween guitar melodies
Imagine Queensryche with Michael Kiske after Tate left.
love kiske in the 80s, but geoff tate was a monster at his peak, probably the best singer ever, technically. ...
What?
Hell yeah....Tate is the superior voice no doubt
Wow, you're an idiot, its gotta suck for you: the whole being alive thing
Tate was better than Kiske, but to call him the best singer ever from a technical point of view is a HUGE stretch.
Bruh
Geoff Tate is the best vocals so much power.
Kiske's high notes sound fuller but in the lower range Kiske's voice is sweet while Tate's is more dramatic. Now Geoff Tate has lost his voice while Kiske still sounds the same.
Not anymore:) geoff is back!!
@@1francosvizzero I'll try to find new videos of him. Last time I saw him he sounded awful and had a backup female singer so it would sound like he was reaching the high notes even though it was the back up singer doing most the work. Are you sure it's not a back up singer making him sound good?
@@luisgarrues ruclips.net/video/59KMNPOO2y4/видео.html
@@luisgarrues ruclips.net/video/_wnkIHs0IHA/видео.html
@@luisgarrues kiske stopped touring for many years.
I do not believe I have ever seen someone do such a great job at showing comparisons. Many of the examples are in the same key and hitting the same notes. Bravo, man. Really well done!
Yeah youre right!!!
Great work!! Same keys .......
Similar sounding voices on some notes. But it’s easy to tell Tate had better technique if you listen to full songs
And more soul too.
Geoff was more dynamic, he sounded great in every position he layed his voice...... but Kiske was great also
Tate, Arch and Jeff Scott Soto in the 80's were the absolute pinnacle of (power) metal singing. No one - not even Halford and Dickinson could rival them in range, power, control and technique.
You are out of your mind nothing comes close to
To Maiden live 1982 have you heard Jeff Scott Soto sing aces high clearly doesn't have range
Well, considering Dickinson's sick voice range in Run to the Hills, I consider that Geoff, Dickinson, Arch, LaBrie and Dio are the best metal voices ever. I know Halford it's a God too, but he would get the 6th place for me.
ItsNotaTuhmah Midnght????
I have to throw in Tony Harnell into that bag too.
But about the Tate - Kiske comparison, what makes Tate stand out is his intonation and lower range. Kiske got the range, but the way he sings is... flatter.
I hear the similarities, but it will always be Tate for me.
Listen to Tate sing TAKE HOLD OF THE FLAME...the guy is a god
Idolatry is a grave sin. I'm a fan of Geoff Tate's work in Queensryche, but he is only a man. Peace!
@@RapidCycling07 Just an expression. Chill out
Dois sublimes vocals!
Impossível desmerecer um deles em algum quesito, me nego!
i agree
AND!: They are both bold right now ;)
I think you mean BALD.
@@hinjurock70 Probably bold too :D
Two legendary beasts!!!
This is an amazing compilation of comparable vocal performances!!! Great job on the video
Kiske.. el mejor vocalista de todos los tiempos!!! 🤘😎
To me not!
I read an interview long ago with Michael about vocal influences: He was actually trying to sing like Geoff because he's a fan. I grew up as a younger teenager with both Queensryche and Helloween and they were simply original and awesome in their prime.
And the winner for best singer in the world forever is...................
GEOFF TATE!!!!!!!!!!!
By an overwhelming majority vote!
Thank you and goodnight!
Geoff Tate🤘
Could we notice the difference if Geoff recorded a classic Kiske song with Helloween, and Kiske a classic Tate song with Queensryche? Damn, they sound like vocal twins!
No way. Go listen to Queensryche's London or any song with emotion and that type of specific phrasing. I really like Kiske, but he sings technique without much emotion and lacks dynamic phrasing.
@@wordragon kiske shows more emotion
@@Bananenbennie Nowadays yes
Exactly, embrace them BOTH!!!!!
Geoff Tate was Kiske's influence. I think Kiske himself said it in an interview.
Kiske could never match Tate's lower range. Tate's lower range is legendary.
Maybe, but kiske does have good songs sung in his lower range. All of his elvis covers, plus a few unisonic songs.
Listen
- King for a day live.
- all Elvis cover
Tate leans in the direction of bass kiske leans in the direction of tenor
@@bryanwhite5766 No, Geoff uses all of his registers. The main difference is Kiske is a technical singer, where Geoff uses both technical skill and phrasing to evoke emotion.
Kiske uses his low register too. Check acoustic intro to Keeper Of The Seven Keys (the song) and A Tale That Wasn't Right
2 of the best ever....
Geoff - > all
Both great but Geoff Tate is clearly the better voice. Hands down.
Plus, Geoff Tate is a baritone and can also go much lower!
No Kiske is better
Just coming to say a big THANK YOU for the big work here. Great compilation, difficult as well to pick the proper cuts on the songs, same vocal tones, etc. THANKS.
Tate is more complete but Jesus, their voices are so similar
Please do not take the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ is vain. Peace!
@@RapidCycling07 lol
I've seen them both alive takes it to the next level live.
They are very similar to each other, they have the same tone and range (many people says in the comment that Tate is a baritone and Kiske a tenor but it's not true, they are the same, between baritone and tenor, 70% of the male population are between baritone and tenor, the difference is that Tate was a heavy smoker and his speaking voice sounds more deep, but is not lower than Kiske) for me Kiske has a more pleasent tone, very beautiful on the lower register, and less..."unique" on the high notes. But for me Geoff is a legend, a very very very unique singer and performer, iconic in every way. And the cool thing is that his recent live performances are unbelievably good.
NOBODY HAS DEMONSTRATED THERE VOCAL RANGE BETTER THAN "GEOFF TATE" QUEEN OF THE REICH,TAKE HOLD OF THE FLAME,LADY WHORE BLACK, ROADS TO MADNESS. GEOFF TATE BECAME A LEGEND ON QUEENSRYCHE ,THE DEMO .THE WARNING THERE 1ST STUDIO ALBUM IS A LEGENDARY.
Lady Whore Black? I've met a few of those 😎
Tate❤
Great comparisons, but you seriously need to include the end on En Force.
That song sealed my dedication to Geoff Tate.
No one's voice resonates with me more than Geoff. No contest.
Both phenomenal.
But it' Tate for me. He can match tecnique and emotion, he's better on low range (cause he is a baritone, unreal baritone but anyway a baritone).
Anyway pick the one you prefer, you'll never go wrong.
Dom kaneki pretty sure kiske is a baritone as well. Not as low as Tate obviously, but he doesn’t have that typical tenor ring in his mid range like a Bruce Dickinson or Dio would have.
Kiske can sing very low too.
@@jayhay8 what typical tenor ring? They sing in that metal twang/edgy/ mix voice, they don’t use full voice. Kiske is a tenor, Geof is a baritone, Kiske has superiority in all ways in higher register naturally, but he kinda use more baritonish approach for some reason. Baritone can not connect chest above g4, tenor can up to say E5. I like Geofs singing and music, but there is nothing impressive absout his thin, no chest highs. Everyone can sing like that
@@macakucizmama831 Kiske’s voice was thinner though. Neither of them use true chest voice, especially as they go higher in range. But Tate’s voice throughout has more body than Kiske.
In this young ages, both were great equally!
Only kiske could kick hi fuking notes until his old days
Geoff so much dynamic,versatille...
Kiske!!
Both Great but in the end its simply a matter of Taste and its Geoff Tate for me. love the tone and vibrato flows, the transitions in and out of the diffrent voices are smoother. again,, thats just a personal opinion from personal taste.
THE WARNING ALBUM TRULY SHOWCASED GEOFF TATE'S VOCAL RANGE ON QUEENSRYCHE 1ST STUDIO ALBUM! HE BECAME A METAL GOD 🤘
I agree. I think The Warning is probably my favorite album, but I also love Mindcrime. The Warning is so underrated.
+Fang Face, stop spamming every single post dude, we get it... you like Agent Steel.
Idolatry is a grave sin. I'm a fan of Geoff Tate's work in Queensryche, but he is only a man. Peace!
El estill de Geoff unmatched
Definately Tate ! Better quality and depth in his voice !!! No Match for me here !
Soy fanatico de kiske..pero hay que reconocer que geoff tate en los 80 era un moustro..mucho mas completo que kiske..contolaba su voz como queria..por algo es el numero 13 de los mejores vocalistas de rock de todos los tiempos....alemanes los dos geoff tate y kiske...grandes entre grandes...viva el rock
At high register both Geoff Tate and Michael Kiske sound almost identical or have just about the same rabge, but on low register Geoff Tate sounds darker and more pleasent IMO.
I prefer Geoff Tate in his prime, but like I said both at high register sound almost identical.
Kiske of course
Tate’s voice more versatile
I listened to Helloween/Queensryche equally in the 80's/90's...it's a DRAW for me, as far as vocals go. Geoff has a smoother, sultrier low register. But Michael is there with him on the higher register. I mean, both of these guys could sing their arses off.
I think Kiske has set the benchmark for Power Metal lead vocals and has a very distinctive wide vibrato. Tate sounds more musical to me, especially in the lower as he's a Baritone (or fake bariton, shall we call it...), and overall I think he's a bit superior technics-wise. But those were the good old days, now they both are very different singers than before, even though i still love them today.
FAKE baritone? What? 😂
@@rafaeljannotti3002 I mean, he's a Baritone with extended range. Often called fake baritones, as they can sing as high as tenors, and as low as baritones, without (almost) any noticeable difference, almost effortlessly.
@@jeandista I guess its the opposite in such case, that would make him a fake tenor (a fake baritone would be a tenor with extended low range).
love both still my vote for kiske
both great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I kinda of stayed away from helloween. I initially saw them in a lower light. But thanks to this video I now have something else to explore. Thanks. I'm still team tate, he is a master. He has better control thru all octaves.
Geoff 100%
Kiske....always.
Tate. Nobody gets even close to him in his prime. Not even Dickinson....
Lower, meadle or high notes, Geoff is more complete and perfect.
Can't compare between my left and right arms. I need them both. Both are brilliant singers. Love them both.
They are both my favorites. I heard Kiske first when i was very young and at that time nothing could be better than him in my world. However, as i've grown i relate more to Tate's person. Maybe QR and Tate is more mature, smart and adult oriented, while Helloween and Kiske is more funny and gives a positive hype.
Los dos por igual!! Muy tecnicos!!! Demasiados!!
Both have great, powerful highs. Prefer Tate at lower register. Beautiful lower register
Kiske Insuperable!! Al igual que Rob Halford the metal God
Geoff sounds much better in the lower range. Its not even close really.
theyre both incredible..cannot choose. Kiske nowadays though of course lol
the difference between them now is that one of them can still pull this off almost exactly the smae and the other has lost his range and his tone.
I recognize more songs from Tate, both great singers but c'mon Geoff is recognized with the greats, Halford. Dickinson, Dio...
Kiske: "Geoff Tate is technically probably the best Metal vocalist around. But I must say that I only liked him very much when I was younger. The older I got the more I found him sort of clinical and unreal. Technic is important when you start off, but it needs more to tell the story. I learned a lot from him like I did from Bruce Dickinson, Robert Halfort, Ronnie James Dio or Elvis Presley, but now I do my own stuff."
Tate used alot of studio shit to enhance his power. Otherwise he ain't nothing. Watch Dios "Stars" recordings without effects. Tate was terrible until they put effects on it.
@@jonclarkson5911 lol
@@jonclarkson5911 that's a good one lmao
Kiske
Prefer Ray Alder of Fates Warning to both personally but Geoff was the creator of this whole thing...yes, Halford, Mercury, Perry, Gillan but Geoff married opera & vocal gymnastics like nobody before i'd heard
Well Kiske is just amazing, a God. But I prefer Tatte because he was the MAN back then, a complete BEAST. Queensryche is one of my fav bands ever and Geoff's voice was just insane. I couldn't imagine any other '80s band like Queensryche without him.
Dont know about Tate... but kiske was still a teen when recruited by hansen... funny how at such young age he had such a powerful diaphragm and voice... and today all my fellow vocalist sing like beiber
awesome video..great comparisons
Kiske top best HALLOWEEN
Kiske easily wins for me. He's my all time favorite singer.
Tate is more versatile can sound like 3 in 1 besides being the pioneer of this style of singing
Rob Halford was the pioneer of this vocal style.
SIN PALABRAS GRANDES LOS DOS.
Both a great, but Geoff is the master.
geoff tate kick ass
Kiske is good, is close but Tate is better not only in power even the other is close but also in color, in clarity, in emotion well express. Tate was the best at that time not only becaus of the power but for the melody in the voice, the color, the emotion all bombined. That is why it is very hard to keep a voice like that when you become older. Many many song need that vocal to be in good shape.. even in texture. There is not only high pîtch but middle in texture and way down and than come back , etc... etc... Many songs need performance. He was my favorite becaus he was the most complete with a clear voice. Many had power but not a beautiful voice like him.
Michael kiske forever!!!!!
Michael Kiskeは、凄いわ
I can die happy, when I hear Tate singing " I want out ", and Kiske singing " Queen of the Reich ".Unfortunately, this is not likely to happen, especially nowadays, when both singers are not what they were long ago.
Kiske hasn't lost much
kiskeispretty much the same, listen to I want out at loud park 2011, then listen to the final note. be blown away :D
Thereal Chromaggus I did see and listen Kiske live @ Kavarna Rock Festival, 29.06.2015, and his vibratto when singing I want out is not the same, he has lost much of it, and now he sounds thin.But hey, Kiske having a concert 70 km away from home - I am one lucky man !!!
y7eah aha, just sounds abit off
Last year in an interview with Unisonic, Kiske said that he considers covering Take Hold of the Flame
Dois vocalistas maravilhosos , gosto um pouco mais do tate mas o kiske é um monstro Tb, e os dois tem estilos parecidos de cantar, porém o. Kiske conservou melhor a voz, mas nós anos 80 tate era o melhor vocalista, o que ele cantou do The warning até o operation é algo sem comparação
Man this is a tough one for me because they are my two favorite singers ever period!! I think if I had to choose I would go with Kiske only because the very first time I heard him sing even my dog looked at me in disbelief 😜
Going with Michael Kiske. He can hold notes for much longer, plus their ranges are really the same.
Genios los dos con sus voces.. El único ganador la música.. Viva kiske
Both are very good in high notes but I think sure Geoff Tate are more completely best in low vocals ..
Tate the best !
Recording studio-Tate
Live-Kiske
Now-Kiske
High note-Kiske
No comparison. Tate was all there is.
Ambos usam a mesma técnica de voz, porém com uma pequena diferença no timbre. Mas óbvio que Kiske copiou Tate.
Acredito que o que kiske teve de influência de Tate ficou nos keepers I e II principal e mais claramente no keepers I.
Do PBGA em diante, inclusive em sua carreira solo, kiske obteve a sua identidade vocal.
Ao meu ver, o timbre do kiske é um dos mais encorpados e claros em notas altíssimas, no heavy metal em geral.
SadDadDancer Prophecy was RE-recorded during Rage; it was first recorded around Warning, and was on the Decline of Western Civilization soundtrack (but the version on this vid is the Rage version, so yeah)
Eu conheci o Helloween primeiro, aí quando meu ouvi queensryche pela primeira vez eu achei que era o Michael Kiske cantando kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Kiske is the children of prophecy \m/
In high ones, is exactly the same thing but in middle and lows Geoff is the king
Geoff was a beast!!!
Their both german ,so, i can imagine kiske going to a queensryche concert and having major influence.
100% Geoff 🤘
High notes: Kiske, low notes: Tate, mid voice: draw, phrasing: Tate, longevity: Kiske, beauty: Kiske.
I disagree. 1984 Tate was hot.
1:05 Uau! I love this :-)