SIRUI's 24mm F2.8 Anamorphic Lens
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 янв 2021
- In this video I check out SIRUI's new release: a 24mm F2.8 anamorphic lens. Here is a link to the Indigogo campaign: www.indiegogo.com/projects/si...
You can buy the 50mm F1.8 anamorphic here: geni.us/3VSG9Hg (Paid Amazon Link)
or on B&H here: bhpho.to/33ufjHY
You can buy the 35mm F1.8 anamorphic here: geni.us/n79Fc (Paid Amazon Link)
or on B&H here: bhpho.to/32r8JCN You will also need this adapter mount: bhpho.to/3qrIHbT
M Y G E A R :
Cameras -
📷 WHAT I USE TO RECORD: geni.us/qEib
📷 BACKUP CAMERA: geni.us/eWBG
📷 BEST STARTER/BUDGET CAMERA: geni.us/Ujn1TC3
📷 BEST FULL FRAME FOR THE $$$: geni.us/8PxAj
Lenses -
❤️ MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS: geni.us/BbGlnB
❤️ BEST PORTRAIT LENS: geni.us/bvwq
❤️ BEST ULTRAWIDE LENS: geni.us/ARXj
❤️ BEST DO-EVERYTHING LENS: geni.us/dDLwY
❤️ WHAT I FILM MY VIDEOS WITH: geni.us/ojGKI
❤️ MY FAVORITE CHEAP/MANUAL LENS: geni.us/cQoztp
Accessories -
🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES: geni.us/TXaeo3B
🎤 AUDIO RECORDER: geni.us/L5dejj
🎤 MICROPHONE: geni.us/O8UzW
⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD: geni.us/4uf5
⚙️ BEST GIMBAL: geni.us/iYiy
⚙️ SD CARD: geni.us/7BhUrBj
🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? geni.us/yn7t0 (Paid Amazon Link)
🌍 OUTSIDE OF THE US? USE THIS LINK: geni.us/ezoD (Paid Amazon Link)
🎦 MY E-MOUNT PAGE: www.amazon.com/shop/technolog...
👧🏼 MY WIFE'S RUclips: goo.gl/P7D5RW
🖼️ INSTAGRAM: / arthur213
MUSIC: ASHUTOSH - Time
Music provided by Vlog No Copyright Music.
Creative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Video Link: • ASHUTOSH - Time (Vlog ...
DISCLOSURES:
I participate in the Amazon Affiliates Program, where I earn a small commission if you decide to purchase an item at no cost to you.
I participant in the B&H Affiliates Program, an affiliate advertising program in which I earn commissions by linking to bhphoto.com at no cost to you.
I’ve never been so excited for someone else to get a package delivered. Super ready for your Tamron 17-70 review!!
Just wanna throw out there. Love all your reviews as someone that just got an a6400. More so than that, your music choices during video samples are always sick. Appreciate all this camera content as someone just starting out in the world of photography/videography.
Very interesting lens! Good review as always, Arthur!
Than wide shot really gives a cinematic feel. Great sample video too 👍🏻
Aside from the awesome review content, it's always nice to see you and your family being well and connecting.
Bro your wife is absolutely GORGEOUS. Good for you
Good lens - worth looking into - thanks for your review mate :)
Nice review. 6:25 is actually a very nice anamorphic photo.
very good review as always, waiting for 17-70 2.8
Manual focusing during a video, you nailed it. I have several manual focus lenses and love them but I suck at using them on a video.
That running scene. Very stable nice
Nice shots!
It’s a sin that you haven’t gotten the Tamron 17-70 yet ! Looking forward to your review if you ever get it
That's what I'm waiting for too. I just bought a 23mm Viltrox for sony. I plan to keep the kit lens, the 23mm, add a 17-70, and some kind of superwide (not fisheye) manual lens. I think that will fill all my needs. That Tamron looks like a real winner.
@@TexpatOTG
Laowa 9 2.8 is a magical wide angle without any fisheye distortion. It’s truly a great ultra-wide. Super sharp with just minor vignetting.
@@keystonebrotherb I've been looking at that one. Everyone saying get Sigma 16, But my kit lens and 23mm kinda fill my needs in those areas ... will be checking out the 9
Best $500 lens in my bag. At first I thought it was too small and not worth the $500 price, but after buying, I’d have paid double for it. I have the 16 and it’s great, but the Laowa is extraordinary. The Laowa can nearly be a macro because of close focus ability! Changes all your ideas about perspective.
@@keystonebrotherb I will definitely try one ASAP. Do you use it for stills & vid?
Dude, amazing this looks super high budget.
Good review🔥
Finally! Now I know the purpose of anamorphic lenses 😄 Nice video))
Waiting inpatient for the tamron 17-70 vs Sony 16-55 review. Still stuck here with my 17-70 zeiss on my 6500. Cheers
Nice informative review! I wasn't aware of the aspect ratio benefit of anamorphic lenses. I quite like the flaring : ) Have been very much aware of very oval bokeh highlights in movies though and I find them quite distracting..am always distinctly glad when a video production contains round and cat-eye bokeh highlights. (Yes cats eyes are a bit oval too but they have a different shape and to the sides, not that dead straight-vertical shape that dominates a scene from left to right)
Cool review, can I ask you how do you get this kind of clean image on youtube? What is your export settings? Thanks :)
Hi! Will you testing the new Tamron 17-70 mm 2.8f lens? I'm interested in your opinion before I buy this . :D thanks
Will there be a buyer's tutorial-style episode?
Of course, divided into focal lengths, prime lens and zoom lens.
What lenses to avoid and what are worth having.
I would like to see your son with a thiny camera :) nice video love Sirui !
I think I prefer the 35mm more. But this one is awesome!
8:45 Arthur, are you sure that the anamorph Sirui 24 mm lens is equivalent to a 16 mm spherical lens with cropped top and bottom? If the squeeze-factor is 1.33, then the equivalent should be 19 mm on spherical lens with letterbox. Is this right?
Hi Arthur, if i have to chose between the 24 and the 35 for film weddings highlights, which should i go for (i cant afford both)? thank you so much for your video.
Hi Arthur. Could you use your 24mm Sirui lens and do some interior real estate photographs. I've been looking all over the web and its not forthcoming. I know the lens is not used for this but I love the way it uses the center of the lens, the oval, and then stretches that circular bit of the lens. It looks as if there is much less distortion compared to aspherical wide angle lenses using the entire circular optic. It seems that the 24mm Sirui could pull off a more realistic wide angle interior shot. Anyways if you could do a post for your channel on this I'd love to see it and what you thoughts would be. Awesome, thanks in advance.
I'm very seriously considering the recently released Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens. It appears to be a legit competitor to the Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens for almost half the price. _PLEASE_ do a review!
I need a ring for follow focus. What diameter should i buy for this lens?
Here we are all waiting your review about the new Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 😂
hey bro, Tamron 17-70 f2.8
Did u used speed booster ?
this lens is a specialty item. not for everyone but for people thay make films. a Kit lens would be better than this 99% of the time or the typical hybrid shooter
Its a manual focus cinema lens without manual focus cinema rings. maybebfor indhi amateur movies or nigerian. lol
True the other anamorphic lenses from this company have cinema rings tough
Which of these 3 would you choose with an a6600 if you could only choose 1? I assume one of the faster f1.8 but seeing that those 2 are 35mm and 50mm, the crop factor makes them quite long, no?
The 35mm F1.8 is my favorite out of the three.
35mm for sure. It's a 50mm fov vertically, but the 1.33 after desqueezing, you get I think close to a 35mm-ish look on the horizontal.
That and the flaring is much more controlled and appealing imo.
This might sound a bit daft - but if I used this as a stills lens how would I know the correct stretch recovery in LR?
Depends if you shoot the still in 3:2 or 16:9. Just multiply the width of the photo by 1.33, so 6000x4000 becomes 7980x4000, which is more of a 4:2 ratio, using 3:2 you yield the full sensor readout but less horizontal stretch, 16:9 you get the appearance of a wider shot but at the expense of a top and bottom crop
@@snaprifice I knew someone would know - thanks a lot I truly appreciate it - stay safe; have a super day
@@nelsonclub7722 no worries, its actually a multiplication of 1.33 no matter the width, but 3:2 is technically the best option for stills since that's the full readout. 1.33 isn't the biggest squeeze out there, but I think a lot of people would agree these were mainly targeted at videographers looking to expand 16:9
I've never used a manual focus lens. How easy it difficult is it to get sharp focus?
You have not lived Sir - I grew up on a hard diret of 10x8 5x4 and 120 - we call it hocus pocus in our studio - once you've tried it you will never rely on it again!!!!
Just takes some practice, some cameras have focus peeking and that helps a lot, I use the Helios 44 a lot and I’ve gotten to the point that I almost prefer manual focus (great lens with a lot of character, definitely worth checking out) honestly, if you haven’t tried it, just turn off auto focus on your lens (some cameras you have to turn it off on the camera itself) and try it out before you buy into a lens for this price
Tamron 17-70 vs sigma trio🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Can anyone explain to me why they did not include follow focus gears? Did they just intend this for youtube video? My colleagues as amateur filmmakers would snap this up in a second if they came with them ( i know you can add them but still.)
wow that looks amazing. Feels exactly like I'm watching a movie.
no it doesnt look the same.
Oh so the flares are naturally produced with this lens. Noice.
Your son is going to have a full video and photographic history of his history. Using many different lenses on Sony cameras.
Yes - lines
Yeah, your samples are in line with other RUclipsr's. A bit too much J.J. Abrams where there are reflections or sources. The flares should be softer and more subtle.
Would be cool with filters that can stop up and down flaring, but likely impossible to do
Again. This is not the Tamron 17-70 2.8:
Lost me a manual
So what's the problem with the Tamron 17-70 2.8? We are all waiting for THAT review ;-), not SIRUI
2nd
flaring is so disapointing
The flaring is what is desired in cinema lenses.
@@castielvargastv7931 yup.