@@gangstapikachu7305what so because Harry Kane doesn’t have loads of trophies means he’s shit? Football is not just about trophies. You can individually judge a player or in a team without basing it on trophies.
Facts. He's also not biased. He doesn't just choose his ex teammates. He's man enough to admit Gerrard is better than Scholes or Leo is better than Ronaldo
@@fifty-five6929 lol as Ronaldo fan I say Ronaldo was very wrong to be negative towards Rooney. Rooney was kinda right based on man utds condition. They needed 10 men to run 90 mins.ronny was old to do that. The team wasn't capable of serving
as a manchester united fan, i couldn't agree more..having the opportunity to have steven gerrard at the club is amazing...a complete footballer, one of the best midfielders england has ever had
@fifty-five6929 it's hardly hypothetical, it's based on his experience of playing with all three, and outlining their pros and cons. The alternative is purely using numbers, in which case you'd say Lampard is the best of the three which I don't think is the case. I think it's one of the best analysis of the three that I've heard personally.
@@fifty-five6929 go check yourself,you might have injured your head recently. You have 2 man united and england legends who played with all 3 ,a calm and reasonable analysis and you think you know better? Seriously? YOU? Man who the fuck are you even compared to them in this case? You played with them? Coached them? For the love of Jesus,get some humility,you sat on your ass and watched them play,thats all you did.
Rooney gave a great answer. I had thought he might be biased with scholes because of them being teammates almost their whole career. But, he really appreciated Gerrard and Lampard as well.
Versatility isn't even the best way to describe Gerrard tbh. That usually indicates mediocrity. He was just elite in every aspect of football. Whereas the other 2, although absolutely elite, had their shortcomings.
I dont think versatility equates mediocrity. Messi plays left, center & right attack effectively, his versatility makes him a freak of nature. Ruud Gullit played attacker, midfield & defender and is among the world greats. Backenbauer played defense & midfield effectively, he is the German GOAT. Phillip Lahm played LB & RB without any weakness, world class defender. Versatility is not equal to mediocrity @@JS67137
ignore him? the bbc and sky sports were desperate to sign him as a pundit but he wanted to go back to club management. this man had his own column in the sun newspaper when he was 19 years old. who told you the english media ignore him. this is a video of gary neville interviewing him for sky sports. you couldnt be more wrong.
@FatOne26 the last time I checked they were both retired. They're still very good mates today, so I think Rooney choosing Gerrard is more about keeping his closer mate happier. Don't understand where the "enemy" came from tbh.
I really want Rooney to succeed as a manager, his knowledge of the game is fantastic. Hope he gets a good chance at Plymouth but it’s not going to be an easy task at all
Facts Stevie is the best all rounder but to say Gerrard couldn’t dictate games was completely untrue…the amount of games Stevie dictated was ridiculous and for that reason and the fact Romney just said it he’s obviously the best
Gerrard didn't dictate, but he lifted his teammates both mentally and tactically. Do you understand what I mean? He pushed another players to their best. Gerrard never means to control, but his aura spreads around the field. That's what makes his team look like a beast and the opponents look like a paralyzed prey at the same time. That's what happened in Istanbul 2005. Rooney's comment is already exactly matched in every aspect.
He said couldnt dictate the game like scholes did, so meanint at his level,thats not the same mate. He literally said after if gerrard was at united he would have done almost the same thing that scholes did
@@Jrmy_Makaveys Gerrard wouldn't have done the same thing though. No matter what Rooney says. If he could, he would have done it at Liverpool. Rooney has said many times Scholes was the best player he played with.
@@24sumo here we are changing what I said and sorry im gonna listen to a guy that play with em. Dont even know what are you talking about with he should have done it with liverpool like its the same thing or the same role that was needed for the team
Rooney got it spot on in this video but I don’t agree with ur comment as a whole. I’ve seen and read some HORRENDOUS takes from players of this caliber 😂😂
Rooney is right, as always. Bloody love this guy. Scholes was class but Gerrard could do it all, magnificently. Rooney, however, was better than all of them. A mix of Gerrard, Scholes and Keane but so good he was a striker. Rooney could have done Scholes' role with ease, and that's taking NOTHING away from how good Scholes was.
@da_great_mogul he didn't really play there, but I can't see why he wouldn't have been able to. Just like Gerrard and playing the Scholes role. It was well within his skill set and there's no reason why he couldn't have done it. Wanye was just as fast as Steven, more energetic, more determined, more nasty, stronger...
Ima say this. Rooney will be a legend in liv if he plays for liv. He could do what gerrard does maybe not just them constant torpedo goals like gerrard put in. But if rooney was to put in gerrard shoes to adapt to that mediocre of squad stevie had i bet he could fill gerrard shoes. Scholes can control the game in pool but thts up to the finishers. Mind you scholes had so many world class players to deliver and score and a coach like SAF. We liv never had a scholes and God i wish we had. We only have gerrard to all the shits and thts why gerrard does not give a fuck. He would just 40 50 yards on it and say fuck it ima do it myself.
@@numbnutz7832Rooney has all reason to not say Gerard given he was a united and Everton player. He should hate gerrard but still said he was the best. You can’t get anymore unbiased than that
All of them are incredible players, but Stevie was the best. Especially when he was running the whole show at an underpar Liverpool team for years. Scholes and lampard both had a fantastic squad around them, whereas Steven Gerrard would have to single-hand delete grab games himself and win the trophies just by pure determination and class
@@theenforcer22 Fuk. All this time I thought that was his first game. I live in New Zealand, lifelong Liverpool fan, I was only watching that game because arsenal were 49 games unbeaten or something like that from memory. Then it all began. Everyone knew. Holy shit.
I'm italian, here cause i love Steve G. I'm lucky to enjoying football in 90s - 2000s,best era ever, expecially for so many great midfielder. Between 1973 born and 1980 born: Gerrard, Xavi, Pirlo, Scholes, Nedvěd, Lampard, Ballack, Davids, Seedorf, Cambiasso, Stankovic, Veron, Vieira, Ljungberg, Emerson, Prosinecki, Mendieta, Baraja, Albelda, Gattuso, Ambrosini, Van Bommel, Deco, Maniche, Costinha, Beckham, Emre,
One thing Gerrard gets underated for yes he passed tackled finished incredible shot carry a team but he was insanely quick and could turn on 6 pence and drible 3 or 4 players was like kaka when running with a ball
Lampard was little less flash than Gerrard, but the better player. He controlled games by himself, always calmly saw Chelsea through. His mentality and intelligence were the difference. Not to mention he scored many more goals, which were a complete bonus to his overall game.
Tell you what this man played a massive part in sending my team down this season but i cant hate him his a england legend the best i have seen in my eyes
I've always said that Scholes was my favourite of the three, I just love the way he plays the game. At the same time, I've always said Gerrard was the best of the three, and it's hard to argue to with.
if gerrard could played in top clubs at that time like Real, Chelsea or Man U, people would've consider him better than xavi or iniesta. He could easily move to those clubs but he stayed for royalty. He is so underrated because he played his most of career with normal squad players in Liverpool.
Good joke. He was not even better than Xabi alonso at liverpool. He is more complete but not better overall. Xavi and Iniesta dominate the game at a different level
Mate better than xavi and iniesta is bit exaggerating it,even lula modric who won the balland dor is not better than those guys ,maybe gerrard would have been respected more for titls and everything
@@AbdullahHashi-kw3qj no ,they are after klopp came before that they hadnt won the league in 30 years ,they were just another team won one ucl (miracle) but gerrard stayed there .and didnt move to big clubs even man utd were keen to sign him but he refused
I think Gerrard got situation same like bruno fernandes. Because they both play with the team no winning epl title at their prime. So football fan underrated them compare to midfield player who win epl titles.
Lampard's goalscoring ability was insane. Best goalscoring midfielder since Platini and one of the greatest of all time. The likes of Zidane, Kaka and Ronaldinho didn't come close statistically
People seem to think you’re a Liverpool fan for picking Gerrard don’t understand how good Prime Gerrard was. Such a complete midfielder because he had to be that carrying a mediocre Liverpool team for years.
@@DH-1992 so what? I care more about controlling the game as a midfielder and what they could do on a pitch? By your logic Lampard is better than Zidane and Iniesta also?
@@1991jamesbondYou can’t have watched Chelsea enough to say that he didn’t control games at least as much as Gerrard. The tempo etc was completely decided by him. It’s strange watching them now and seeing a Chelsea side without him. Gerrard’s footballing intelligence didn’t match Lampard’s, which made a huge difference. He never made mistakes and never lost control
Exactly like paul scholes says on other interview.. he wouldn't have been able to do what gerrard did at liverpool.. scholes is part of the team, but gerrard is more individually.. apart from that, i think its unfair to compare those 3 players as just theyre just very different
Steven Gerrard made the most PFA premier league teams of the year more than any other player as voted by their fellow professionals who faced him or played with him. Think they have a better idea than most of us considering they were on the pitch with him or against him!
Been saying similar for years. All 3 world class but Gerrard could do it all and play to a top level in more positions and even wide positions running channels which the other two couldn’t and covered more ground and put in more tackles etc. As great as they are I don’t think the other two could do what Gerrard could do at Liverpool and Scholes admitted to that himself.
Steven Gerrard is one of the best cm midfielders of all time zindane bechanbauer Gerrard my all time midfield all amazing players lamps and Scholes top drawer
Lets be honest. Scholes was the best! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Zidane never scored many goals, couldn't tackle but he had a natural ability on the pitch that mesmerized everyone and that's why he's considered the greatest. Similarly you can say this about Scholes. He just had a natural ability way ahead of Gerrard and Lampard. Neither Lampard, nor Gerrard could compete technically with Scholes. You couldn't get to him and you couldn't get the ball off him. He was untouchable. The elegance, the touches, the flicks was on another level. Nobody dictated the game like he did and he is the reason why United were so successful and won so many trophies. He was their most important player. Gerrard and Lampard combined never even won as many trophies as Scholes. Show respect to the master!
Liverpool fan here for me the best English player I’ve ever seen is Wayne Rooney. When Ronaldo left United he was the best player in England for many years and also one of the best on the planet. My hatred for United can’t get in the way of admitting greatness and Rooney is the best I’ve seen. Gerrard is the greatest midfielder to ever play in England in my opinion he was complete but the greatest English player for me is Rooney I can’t be bias
Scholes said that himself that he couldn't do what Gerrard did for Liverpool, however, personally I liked scholes due to his adaptability. West Bromwich Albion fan so no bias before I get you're a united fan.
Overrated. No one at the time feared Lampard when their team played against Chelsea. He would always pop up with a goal in the box, but in play, he wasn't who he is made out to be. Gerrard>Scholes>Yaya>Lampard.
I disagree with just one point there. I dont think anybody of those two could dictate games like Scholes regardless of whether they joined united or not.
@@pauliewalnuts5803 Gerrard was exceptional at dragging Liverpool specially when Liverpool had their backs against the wall. Scholes doesn't possess that. What he does possess is control of tempo and control of the game.
Gerrard is the best among all 3. Wazza is right. Lampard and scholes would not be able to be the player that they were at a mediocre liverpool side. If gerrard was a man united player he would have been bigger than beckham.
Best analysis I’ve ever heard on these three. You can’t argue with it. It’s facts
Yes bro, well done Rooney
Giggs > Scholes 200x
Fcuk off its Rooney. He has no clue
Not really if Frank Lampard went to liverpool he would have done well
You can argue with it, it’s not ‘facts’ it’s his opinion
Provably the best answer I've heard when it comes to the magic trio.
Tragic trio
Totally agree
ruclips.net/user/shortssXKtVMnlp_w?si=UzE-EHMSqXOKTavE
(Crouch and Carra)
This is for me the best answer.
@@dinbachok6424Really really tragic. Regarded as the golden era yet didnt win a single silver ware.
@@gangstapikachu7305what so because Harry Kane doesn’t have loads of trophies means he’s shit? Football is not just about trophies. You can individually judge a player or in a team without basing it on trophies.
Actually nice to have an answer that isn't safe or media trained. Hope this mentality doesn't get punished because I like it.
Lol, rooney has been like that always. Ronaldo fanboys just love clowning him
He's a Scouser. He'll be OK.
Is that what usually happens to things you like?
Why would it get punished!? Some football fans are absolute lunatics haha
@@andyw9255 😂😂😂
Ball knowledge 1000%
Facts. He's also not biased. He doesn't just choose his ex teammates. He's man enough to admit Gerrard is better than Scholes or Leo is better than Ronaldo
Well he played with and against all of them so obviously he knows them very well 😂
@@devinleong8126Nah he is just an attention begger and has no respect for the people he has played with
@@fifty-five6929 let me guess your a Ronaldo fan😭
@@fifty-five6929 lol as Ronaldo fan I say Ronaldo was very wrong to be negative towards Rooney. Rooney was kinda right based on man utds condition. They needed 10 men to run 90 mins.ronny was old to do that. The team wasn't capable of serving
as a manchester united fan, i couldn't agree more..having the opportunity to have steven gerrard at the club is amazing...a complete footballer, one of the best midfielders england has ever had
You can’t really argue with this analysis
Yes you can. His reasoning is purely hypothetical.
@fifty-five6929 it's hardly hypothetical, it's based on his experience of playing with all three, and outlining their pros and cons. The alternative is purely using numbers, in which case you'd say Lampard is the best of the three which I don't think is the case. I think it's one of the best analysis of the three that I've heard personally.
I'm a United fan and a Scholes fanboy and agree
@@fifty-five6929 go check yourself,you might have injured your head recently. You have 2 man united and england legends who played with all 3 ,a calm and reasonable analysis and you think you know better? Seriously? YOU? Man who the fuck are you even compared to them in this case? You played with them? Coached them? For the love of Jesus,get some humility,you sat on your ass and watched them play,thats all you did.
Gerrard could never control a game from deep like scholes did
Rooney gave a great answer. I had thought he might be biased with scholes because of them being teammates almost their whole career. But, he really appreciated Gerrard and Lampard as well.
Would have loved to see the Gerrard lampard situation solved by playing lampard behind rooney
Spot on with the answer! No Utd or Anti Liverpool bias. Perfectly spot on
Finally an answer that doesnt involve slagging off 2 of them to elevate the other
Gerard is probably the best box-to-box midfielder EVER in the Premier League.
And I'm a Chelsea fan.
@@ksadjdadjaifen
Yeah, that slip was iconic.
@@ksadjdadjaifen I'm not even a Liverpool and even I felt bad for him
@@ob9312I didn't
Extremely fair analysis
I used to doubt Gerrard as a United fan but now I see the value of his versatility.
Versatility isn't even the best way to describe Gerrard tbh. That usually indicates mediocrity. He was just elite in every aspect of football. Whereas the other 2, although absolutely elite, had their shortcomings.
I dont think versatility equates mediocrity. Messi plays left, center & right attack effectively, his versatility makes him a freak of nature. Ruud Gullit played attacker, midfield & defender and is among the world greats. Backenbauer played defense & midfield effectively, he is the German GOAT. Phillip Lahm played LB & RB without any weakness, world class defender. Versatility is not equal to mediocrity @@JS67137
@@JS67137Gerrard was totally not elite at every aspect. As Rooney said, he was the most complete but that doesn't mean he was elite at everything.
@@perakojot5628 What wasn't he elite at?
@@perakojot5628Stevie was elite at pretty much everything except for dribbling like Neymar …he was a traditional orthodox kind of player.
This is same view I’ve had as a neutral who saw all three. But fans want to be toxic about it. Much respect to Rooney for his honesty.
Rooney has always been true to football his career and his opinions, English media and fans ignore him cz he speaks his mind.
ignore him?
the bbc and sky sports were desperate to sign him as a pundit but he wanted to go back to club management.
this man had his own column in the sun newspaper when he was 19 years old.
who told you the english media ignore him.
this is a video of gary neville interviewing him for sky sports.
you couldnt be more wrong.
Hats off to Rooney 🫡 admiring the enemy 😎
Wayne and Steven are mates. Far more than what he is with Scholes and Lampard.
@johncarter9658 so what you saying is there's no rivalry between them and their clubs💀
@FatOne26 the last time I checked they were both retired. They're still very good mates today, so I think Rooney choosing Gerrard is more about keeping his closer mate happier. Don't understand where the "enemy" came from tbh.
Once Scousers, Always Scousers.
@@da_great_mogula guy who played for Man U and Everton saying a Liverpool player is the best midfielder 👏
Great honest assessment ❤⚽️
Gerrard man he really was an all rounder
I'm a Chelsea fan, and I agree with Rooneys analysis, Gerrard is in next level
Wow... I like it... cheers Rooney, from a Chelsea fan💙
I really want Rooney to succeed as a manager, his knowledge of the game is fantastic. Hope he gets a good chance at Plymouth but it’s not going to be an easy task at all
Thats why Rooney is my all time United fav player..even come from me a Liverpool fan
Finally an honest real answer, not a media trained popular answer.
Scholes also said the same thing about stevie😂
Facts Stevie is the best all rounder but to say Gerrard couldn’t dictate games was completely untrue…the amount of games Stevie dictated was ridiculous and for that reason and the fact Romney just said it he’s obviously the best
Gerrard didn't dictate, but he lifted his teammates both mentally and tactically. Do you understand what I mean? He pushed another players to their best.
Gerrard never means to control, but his aura spreads around the field. That's what makes his team look like a beast and the opponents look like a paralyzed prey at the same time. That's what happened in Istanbul 2005.
Rooney's comment is already exactly matched in every aspect.
Rooney said Scholes and Ronaldo were the best lol. Did you not watch the video .
He said Gerrard is the better all round player.
It’s not hard
He said couldnt dictate the game like scholes did, so meanint at his level,thats not the same mate. He literally said after if gerrard was at united he would have done almost the same thing that scholes did
@@Jrmy_Makaveys Gerrard wouldn't have done the same thing though. No matter what Rooney says. If he could, he would have done it at Liverpool.
Rooney has said many times Scholes was the best player he played with.
@@24sumo here we are changing what I said and sorry im gonna listen to a guy that play with em. Dont even know what are you talking about with he should have done it with liverpool like its the same thing or the same role that was needed for the team
You know it's peak ball knowledge when it's coming from a player of that stature!
Rooney got it spot on in this video but I don’t agree with ur comment as a whole. I’ve seen and read some HORRENDOUS takes from players of this caliber 😂😂
Rooney is right, as always. Bloody love this guy.
Scholes was class but Gerrard could do it all, magnificently.
Rooney, however, was better than all of them. A mix of Gerrard, Scholes and Keane but so good he was a striker.
Rooney could have done Scholes' role with ease, and that's taking NOTHING away from how good Scholes was.
He tried stepping back but failed so retired early
He's better than all of them as striker. He isn't as good as Gerrard in centre of park.
@da_great_mogul he didn't really play there, but I can't see why he wouldn't have been able to.
Just like Gerrard and playing the Scholes role. It was well within his skill set and there's no reason why he couldn't have done it.
Wanye was just as fast as Steven, more energetic, more determined, more nasty, stronger...
You lot have not watched Scholes lmao
Ima say this. Rooney will be a legend in liv if he plays for liv. He could do what gerrard does maybe not just them constant torpedo goals like gerrard put in. But if rooney was to put in gerrard shoes to adapt to that mediocre of squad stevie had i bet he could fill gerrard shoes. Scholes can control the game in pool but thts up to the finishers. Mind you scholes had so many world class players to deliver and score and a coach like SAF. We liv never had a scholes and God i wish we had. We only have gerrard to all the shits and thts why gerrard does not give a fuck. He would just 40 50 yards on it and say fuck it ima do it myself.
This settles the debate
Nope. Different players and rose tinted spectacles. Club allegiances and the tribal fans. TRIBAL😂
@@numbnutz7832Rooney has all reason to not say Gerard given he was a united and Everton player. He should hate gerrard but still said he was the best. You can’t get anymore unbiased than that
Rooney saying Scholes was the better player settles it?
Not sure about that as Rooney is biased.
Although you’re right. Scholes is better
He literally suss Ronaldo
And Scholes were the best lol
But Gerrard was the better all round player
Hint. The first 10 seconds lol
Wayne is so honest
All class,for me stevie g favourite player in pl history and I’m a city fan, hate the scousers to.absolute professional and class
All of them are incredible players, but Stevie was the best. Especially when he was running the whole show at an underpar Liverpool team for years. Scholes and lampard both had a fantastic squad around them, whereas Steven Gerrard would have to single-hand delete grab games himself and win the trophies just by pure determination and class
Hard to argue with that. I still remember Wayne’s 1st game. What a proper fkn career he had.
Spurs at home?
@@theenforcer22 arsenal.
@@jasonosborne9063 that was his first goal. Debut was Spurs at home.
@@theenforcer22 Fuk. All this time I thought that was his first game. I live in New Zealand, lifelong Liverpool fan, I was only watching that game because arsenal were 49 games unbeaten or something like that from memory. Then it all began. Everyone knew. Holy shit.
@@jasonosborne9063 No worries! He was 16 years old for both games so still very early on!
Gerrard Legend! Scholes, Rooney and Lamps too
At least with this he has finally settled the debate. For those who still allow sentiment to becloud them
I’m not sure Rooney saying Scholes and Ronaldo were the best he played with settles ir
@@24sumo we're talking about the three English midfield trio
Play for Manu and Everton but still choose Gerrard over Scholes. Facts over biased.
a Scouser picking another Scouser…😅 biased!! ..lol nahh im joking… he was spot on
I must have missed the bit where he said Gerrard was the best 😂
Did you watch the video 😂😂😂😂
He literally says the best players he played with were Ronaldo and Scholes
Fantastic analysis!
Gerrard was incredible in every aspect. 💪
Well said.
he got to play with them and against the 2 as well. Literally an astute analysis
I'm italian, here cause i love Steve G. I'm lucky to enjoying football in 90s - 2000s,best era ever, expecially for so many great midfielder. Between 1973 born and 1980 born: Gerrard, Xavi, Pirlo, Scholes, Nedvěd, Lampard, Ballack, Davids, Seedorf, Cambiasso, Stankovic, Veron, Vieira, Ljungberg, Emerson, Prosinecki, Mendieta, Baraja, Albelda, Gattuso, Ambrosini, Van Bommel, Deco, Maniche, Costinha, Beckham, Emre,
Just facts. No bias nonsense or tribalism.
Yup. Schoels and Ronaldo are the best he’s played with.
Gerrard was better at doing everything well tho.
So schoels was better. Settled
The best answer
So Gerrard was the best
No he was on about lampard 🙄
@@benjohn6743Eh . He says Gerrard best all roundr and better technically
@@dorkknight8846 I was being sarcastic 🤌🏻
Scholes was
Did you actually listen at all ?
Stevie is great, but that slip will never be forgotten..
How's your mud hut
Just like 7-0 ❤
That type of mindset won’t serve you well in life.
@@laudatosiadastra1218 well newsflash: am a united fan
One thing Gerrard gets underated for yes he passed tackled finished incredible shot carry a team but he was insanely quick and could turn on 6 pence and drible 3 or 4 players was like kaka when running with a ball
Lampard was little less flash than Gerrard, but the better player. He controlled games by himself, always calmly saw Chelsea through. His mentality and intelligence were
the difference. Not to mention he scored many more goals, which were a complete bonus to his overall game.
@timothyw815 he was good like nowere near Gerrard though mainly waited for rebounds on edge of box
Rooney always makes sense
Gerrard😍😍😍😍
Very good analysis tbh
Tell you what this man played a massive part in sending my team down this season but i cant hate him his a england legend the best i have seen in my eyes
I hope that puts that debate to bed
That’s an amazing answer
Nice answer❤
Shows how much football understanding rooney has.
I've always said that Scholes was my favourite of the three, I just love the way he plays the game. At the same time, I've always said Gerrard was the best of the three, and it's hard to argue to with.
It’s a stupid opinion tbf
Rooney just said Scholes was better but see how you think you know better 😂😂😂😂
I love it as a Liverpool fan
Fact.
if gerrard could played in top clubs at that time like Real, Chelsea or Man U, people would've consider him better than xavi or iniesta. He could easily move to those clubs but he stayed for royalty. He is so underrated because he played his most of career with normal squad players in Liverpool.
Good joke. He was not even better than Xabi alonso at liverpool. He is more complete but not better overall. Xavi and Iniesta dominate the game at a different level
Mate better than xavi and iniesta is bit exaggerating it,even lula modric who won the balland dor is not better than those guys ,maybe gerrard would have been respected more for titls and everything
What?
Liverpool is a powerhouse
So he is on par with Zidane? Yeah gtfo he is on the same class as pirlo.
@@AbdullahHashi-kw3qj no ,they are after klopp came before that they hadnt won the league in 30 years ,they were just another team won one ucl (miracle) but gerrard stayed there .and didnt move to big clubs even man utd were keen to sign him but he refused
Lampard was a striker, he was bang average midfielder, you never knew he was on the pitch, until he scored.
Finally a brit who really knows about MF 😂
For me I love Scholes but I respect both Gerrard and lampard top world class players! United fan
Great answer but I think Stevie could also dictate the pace of a game too
I think Gerrard got situation same like bruno fernandes. Because they both play with the team no winning epl title at their prime. So football fan underrated them compare to midfield player who win epl titles.
🎯 CASE CLOSED!!! 👌🏼💯
Lampard's goalscoring ability was insane. Best goalscoring midfielder since Platini and one of the greatest of all time. The likes of Zidane, Kaka and Ronaldinho didn't come close statistically
Finally Rooney says it how it is.. lampard technically the worse out off them all
That's it...put Scholes and Lampard in Liverpool they would've not done what Gerrard did in Liverpool.
Exactly, they wouldn't have bottled the league but nice try 😂
@@moorishwarrior341Tennis is not a team sport! It's an individual sport.
Love Rooney
50000000% ball knowledge
United was so stacked back in the day.
Rooney had everything
Most complete player to play the game is either gerrard or Rooney for me
Scholes himself said Gerrard for the exact same reason Rooney described here.
People seem to think you’re a Liverpool fan for picking Gerrard don’t understand how good Prime Gerrard was. Such a complete midfielder because he had to be that carrying a mediocre Liverpool team for years.
The thing they never played together 😢
I’ve always said you can choose either Scholes or Gerrard which is fair enough. But Lampard always has to come 3rd out of the 3.
Lampard more goals.. & more assists. 😂
@@DH-1992 so what? I care more about controlling the game as a midfielder and what they could do on a pitch?
By your logic Lampard is better than Zidane and Iniesta also?
But by that logic Gerrard isn't better than pirlo, xavi and iniesta, because they were more similar to scholes.@@1991jamesbond
@@1991jamesbondYou can’t have watched Chelsea enough to say that he didn’t control games at least as much as Gerrard. The tempo etc was completely decided by him. It’s strange watching them now and seeing a Chelsea side without him. Gerrard’s footballing intelligence didn’t match Lampard’s, which made a huge difference. He never made mistakes and never lost control
Exactly like paul scholes says on other interview.. he wouldn't have been able to do what gerrard did at liverpool.. scholes is part of the team, but gerrard is more individually.. apart from that, i think its unfair to compare those 3 players as just theyre just very different
People forget Scholes started out as a striker. Can't think of many players who moved into midfield like him and did so well.
Wayne Rooney the Future Manchester United manager. Great knowledge of a great player.
I feel bad that a hero is asking questions about other heroes
He's right.
Steven Gerrard made the most PFA premier league teams of the year more than any other player as voted by their fellow professionals who faced him or played with him. Think they have a better idea than most of us considering they were on the pitch with him or against him!
Been saying similar for years. All 3 world class but Gerrard could do it all and play to a top level in more positions and even wide positions running channels which the other two couldn’t and covered more ground and put in more tackles etc. As great as they are I don’t think the other two could do what Gerrard could do at Liverpool and Scholes admitted to that himself.
Steven Gerrard is one of the best cm midfielders of all time zindane bechanbauer Gerrard my all time midfield all amazing players lamps and Scholes top drawer
Rooney ❤
Lets be honest. Scholes was the best! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Zidane never scored many goals, couldn't tackle but he had a natural ability on the pitch that mesmerized everyone and that's why he's considered the greatest. Similarly you can say this about Scholes. He just had a natural ability way ahead of Gerrard and Lampard. Neither Lampard, nor Gerrard could compete technically with Scholes. You couldn't get to him and you couldn't get the ball off him. He was untouchable. The elegance, the touches, the flicks was on another level. Nobody dictated the game like he did and he is the reason why United were so successful and won so many trophies. He was their most important player. Gerrard and Lampard combined never even won as many trophies as Scholes. Show respect to the master!
Liverpool fan here for me the best English player I’ve ever seen is Wayne Rooney. When Ronaldo left United he was the best player in England for many years and also one of the best on the planet. My hatred for United can’t get in the way of admitting greatness and Rooney is the best I’ve seen. Gerrard is the greatest midfielder to ever play in England in my opinion he was complete but the greatest English player for me is Rooney I can’t be bias
Scouser backing a Scouser up
Lampard is the best goal scoring midfielder of all time
Agreed and scoring goals is both the hardest and most important part of the game.
the obnoxious, unfitting piano music, jesus christ
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ikr..soppy and soft, as if they all just died yesterday?! It's football ffs. What's wrong with keeping a video about football simple and normal.
Personally best goal scorer lampard, best all round player I.e in any position gerreard, best all round natural ability scholes!
That hurt gary
Scholes said that himself that he couldn't do what Gerrard did for Liverpool, however, personally I liked scholes due to his adaptability. West Bromwich Albion fan so no bias before I get you're a united fan.
Lampard criminally underrated
Overrated. No one at the time feared Lampard when their team played against Chelsea. He would always pop up with a goal in the box, but in play, he wasn't who he is made out to be. Gerrard>Scholes>Yaya>Lampard.
@@JS67137 Yaya😂
@@JS67137try to watch some lampard highlights, his technique was also very good
I disagree with just one point there. I dont think anybody of those two could dictate games like Scholes regardless of whether they joined united or not.
Perhaps but I don’t think Scholes could carry a game like Gerrard either
@@pauliewalnuts5803 Gerrard was exceptional at dragging Liverpool specially when Liverpool had their backs against the wall. Scholes doesn't possess that. What he does possess is control of tempo and control of the game.
@@Gamer25ize yeah that’s my point
This is why Rooney is a relegation specialist.
Because he can correctly rank his former teammates?
Most Complete - Gerrard
Most Prolific - Lampard
Most Talented - Scholes
I do hate him for the scoff with cr7 but good that he at least knows the facts
..... 100% ball knowledge
I've been saying this, Steven Gerrard is the best of them.
Gerrard is the best among all 3. Wazza is right. Lampard and scholes would not be able to be the player that they were at a mediocre liverpool side. If gerrard was a man united player he would have been bigger than beckham.
They were the 3rd best team in England and a top 8 team in Europe, they weren't exactly mediocre.
One Steven Gerrard
I always here this about Lampard but he has more goals and assist than both and better long range and different kinds of assist