Prosecutor Grills Accused Murderer Danielle Redlick During Cross-Examination
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 июн 2022
- A prosecutor grilled accused murderer Danielle Redlick during cross-examination. He alleged that Redlick wanted to live life without her husband and questioned her about what she did with the knife she used to stab her husband. He also pressed her about inconsistencies in her testimony causing her to admit to lying about particular details.
#DanielleRedlick #RedlickTrial #LawAndCrimeNetwork
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
shes a fabulous witness imo. shes direct, doesnt sugar coat, admits faults, doesnt have to think things up like someone else ive seen recently. I'll bet her dog never stepped on a bee either
Little different than Amber
@@palanna3239 True, though the crazy thing is...given enough time, it makes you wonder if this could've been an outcome in the Depp v Heard relationship had it not ended when it did.
She had been coached a lot lol I don’t buy her story at all
I understood that reference
But comes off as cold & unlikeable with zero emotion. Seems like she doesn’t give an F about any of it
In law school they tell you, to be careful not to come off like you are attacking a witness otherwise you’ll turn the jury against you for bullying them. This is the perfect example of this
He turned me off within 1 minute. You're so right !
So true, he comes off as very aggressive and arrogant, and really handling this case like a “bull in a china shop”. He needs to re-think his style of dealing with cases.
@@pampino4564 VASQUEZ DID THE SAME THING!!! HOW COME NONE OF YOU PEOPLE REALISED THAT???????? BIASED!!!!
@@MissSunshine333 I don't know who Vazquez is , so I can't be bias...
@@pampino4564 Johhny Depp's lawyer. She was grilling Amber Heard just like this!!
I don't know if she intentionally killed him or not but what I do know is after watching Amber Heard in the Depp trial its refreshing watching someone admit their wrongs and not deny what's clearly the truth.
I agree!! She seems honest about her timeline and faults. Its not an amber. It was probably a passion killing. Passionate fight, took it to far on both ends im sure. People lose their tempers and thats ok to an extent.
Stabbing in the shoulder and not stabbing him any further makes me suspect it was probably in self defence. It's not somewhere you would stab someone if you were trying to kill them tbf and I can believe she might have thought as much and that's why she didn't check on him sooner, thinking he might retaliate violently if she did go to check on him.
@@1972dsrai yeah, and the way the crime scene look. Someone who obviously panicked. It was a self defense I believe.
🎯
I feel the same!
"So you did CPR on a dead man?" That is literally when you're supposed to do CPR.
Exactly! Why would you try to revive someone who’s not dead?
This must be a joke! I had to replay it to make sure I heard him right…
YES! My thought exactly!
Yeah, that was a no win question. If she had called 911 first, lawyer would say “so you know he is either dead or nearly so, that brain and cardiac cell damage is happening every second, yet you do nothing except cal someone? Who won’t be there for some time? You didn’t even TRY to save him, even if untrained?” And if you do CPR first …it is “so you didn’t even call first?”
She's not medically trained, but common sense alone would suggest she should have first checked for a pulse, then attempted to stop the bleeding. (She testified she saw considerable amount of blood upon exiting the bathroom, trailing into the living room; the wound still actively and profusely bleeding when she lifted his shirt.) Regardless, while I don't believe for a second she intended to kill him, her actions post stabbing I find odd at best, e.g. failing to call 911, instead cleaning, mopping up the blood.😟
V-tach V- Fib, are both potentially life threatening rhythms; heart still beating but without sufficient blood circulation to vital organs. Respirations can briefly be present even with the absence of a pulse. We don't perform CPR on "dead" people. "Death" is a final clinical declaration made by a medical professional.
.
This prosecutor was his own worst enemy. He seems aggressive, arrogant and badgering. It’s easy to see how timid she is with him.
@@sicilyny5375 I felt the same way!!!
I can’t believe someone on his team didn’t tell him to STOP!!!
Agree !!! His choice of words were so violent and accusatory towards her. It might be a strategy but I wish he would of treat her more humanely
LOL! That is his job. Prosecutor...The State's Attorneys are responsible for the investigation and prosecution of all criminal matters within their respective Judicial District.
Exactly
The prosecutor just chucking the evidence on the floor like that was disgusting. It didn't work sir, it just made you look like a bully.
He must be regretting his bully strategy right now.
Omg..he is such a jerk. Obviously thinks he is better than anyone..but he"s just a bully in a suit
@ Hole Rose but it did work because she was found not guilty. It’s just tactics because she didn’t waiver under heavy questioning. Some people start falling apart under this type of questioning because they’re lying. This prosecution did a great job.
@@artfull334 "This prosecution did a great job." No they didn't. They overcharged her.
@@artfull334 Yes it worked in favour of her this time, but that's not what he was intending
I have no idea whether she is guilty or not, but her husband seemed like a tyrant and this lawyer is incredibly unlikeable.
He’s not meant to be likeable. During cross examination he needs to be tough and hardcore and get answers to the different points he’s trying to prove.
But it’s prob a lot more important during things like opening and closing statements.
@Zero Two Excuse me? Gaslight you? I gave my opinion and was not in a conversation with you.... That aside, regardless of whether this woman is a victim or not, domestic violence victims are not to blame for CHOOSING their future abusers.
I would bet dollars to donuts that if it were a women prosecutor you statement would be different.
@@_birdie he’s still sucks 🤣
@@_birdie There are tough and effective lawyers who don't seem like douchebags.
It's so refreshing to listen to someone that actually sounds like they're just telling the truth. I almost forgot what it sounds like after a certain trial.
Just coming in to this for the first time.. not sure what is happening. I am only a few minutes in but yes I can see how the questions are answered so easily and straightforward. Need to look at the back story about this.
Listening to all of Johnny's lies?
@@brodie6468 do you really think so?
@@brodie6468 facts and evidence says other wise. You believe amber’s multiple different stories to each occasion? Testimony of her crying without tears and posed for a picture during her testimony? Amber was exposed in trial to falsifying evidence. Her bruise kit was caught in photo when Johnny was on the couch. All of the evidence even on amber’s side backs Johnny’s story up. She literally submitted a photo for 2 different stories that happened a year apart. What real victim gives her abuser a knife for a birthday gift? What victim who claims she feared her husband would taunt him and laugh at him and call him names in audio tapes? What victim begs her abuser to say when he tried to leave her in multiple times in audio tapes? There is text messages from amber’s parents to Johnny admitting she lied about everything so she won’t lose the penthouses. There is also an audio of amber admitting that to Johnny on the phone.
Yea, Johnny Depp’s lies exhausted us all! This is refreshing
So strange to hear a witness charged with murder be calm and sound truthful. Actually answering the question. What a contrast after watching amber lie out of her teeth,
My exact thought too! I know there is such a huge contrast in the charges against Danielle and Amber.....but you can see, tell and feel the pain Danielle has and not once can we see, tell or feel it with Amber.
Cause she knew she was telling the truth Amber was telling lies and when telling lies and keep telling lies things change and don't add up.
Man this prosecutor is something else. Anyone else get the vibe that he watches way to much Law & Order?
I think he was trying to be Camille, but he failed miserably
@@IzzyMariel lmfao exactly.
*too
@@IzzyMariel You make me laughing 😃
Do people actually watch that show?
" he threatened you would leave penniless and homeless" -lawyer acts like this is a win for his team. Please. Even if my husband and I parted ways we wouldn't be threatening the other person or any human being that they'd be on the street without the other person. That's a petty and vindictive threat. Which shows a little of the person's character. And that he was intentionally scaring her, why? To obligate her to stay.
He does the defense’s job for him (lucky for her because the defense seems to be asleep at the wheel). Also, the judge? “Hmmmmm… No. overruled.”
We don't even know if he said that. He couldn't follow through with it anyway. They're married and she knows her rights and if not, she had the freedom to ask a lawyer.
@@mellowyellow2022 possible possibly. the prosecution brought that up, if the husband didn't say it why is the prosecuting lawyer saying he did? Even if the prosecutor lied about that, why? To insinuate that the husband saying that he was going to leave her destitute would be motive enough for her to kill him. You are saying she would've known her rights or spoken to a lawyer. Let's assume that. So, following your logic, the prosecutors claim doesn't make sense and that would've been one LESS reason to intentionally kill him.
@@mellowyellow2022 sorry but this is kind of an oversimplification, not to mention just downright dismissive and belittling. I know from personal experience, having witnessed my father make all sorts of similar threats to my mother (and many much worse), that such threats be incredibly effective, intimidating, convincing, traumatic, and make the person on the receiving end very fearful and make them doubt themselves, their own knowledge/understanding of the law, their rights, etc.
My ex husband said the same things. Basically he said he’d ruin me financially, emotionally and physically.
It all occurred. He even addicted our son to drugs to get back at me, and keep control over our child. It worked. My son is now and addict, lives with his father who supplies him with dope!
His tactic is totally backfiring. All he is doing is making the jury more sympathetic to her.
You are soooo right!!!
I agree 100%
He must be regretting his tactic right now. Lesson learned I hope
In this case, putting her on the stand was brilliant; because she sounded honest and believable. She came across like a victim. Prior when he was sitting in the court, she seemed cold and indifferent, but was really good to see her tell her story. She was simple and straight-forward.
so ironic to see people hearing that emotionless rehersed testimony and calling it trustworthy.
@@TheOneanjel - Actually what decent man would marry his step-daughter? A controlling heartless domestic abuser.
@@TheOneanjel all testimony is rehearsed. Witnesses are prepped by their attorney for hours.
@@TheOneanjel She's not showing any signs of deception. Emotionless, maybe. But nobody can cover up everything. Her blink rate is amazingly consistent. Her baseline is amazingly consistent. Amber Heard most assuredly rehearsed and prepared extensively and it was still incredibly obvious that she was lying, on top of the fact that she's a professional actor.
This woman looks beat down and resigned to her fate. She has nothing to hide anymore. And this tool prosecutor can't even get a rise out of her. She's either telling the truth, or telling the truth AND on drugs to flatten her emotions.
?@@robw2486 and what decent daughter would marry her mother's husband?
This can’t be real life. That prosecutor is out of control.
@@sicilyny5375 Little “man” syndrome. He came across as a bully to a DV victim, he was actually snorting out of anger at times. So unprofessional and bad form.
@@sicilyny5375 I agree! Isn't there something against badgering! Because that definitely is badgering in my opinion.
The judge was AS unprofessional and out of line as this out of control attorney was.
@@sicilyny5375 that judge is atrocious…it’s like she wasn’t even paying attention to the case. Scary how they have so power.
He is an animal
Ok, what am I missing. If the prosecutor is accepting her story and timeline, then why is no one bringing up that her husband had plenty of time when he wasn’t dead and when he was walking around to call 911 HIMSELF. The fact that he didn’t and let himself bleed out to me shows three things: he DID in fact attack her and didn’t want to be arrested and charged for attacking her, he was suicidal, he wanted her to be charged for his murder.
Who bleeds out from a shoulder wound?!! I would be bewildered and traumatized just like her. I would be thinking, how could this have happened?! WHAT just happened?!
You can see from her reaction when the verdict was read that she fully expected to be found guilty. She had nothing to hide.
so, he let himself die so she would be charged with murder? yeah, that makes perfect sense. Ur insane
@@vaekkriinhart4347 It’s actually not that outlandish of the guy was suicidal. He could’ve been spiteful enough to do that very thing.
@@deniece0821 she murdered him. if he's suicidal u dont stab urself in the shoulder area (!). Listen to the nine one one calls. she murdered him. I dont how u cannot see this. furthermore, who the F cleans up the place after something like that? who? Any person would call the police right away. But she doesnt do that at all. She waits a long time and tries to clean up her mess
only murderers try to clean the place after. Innocent ppl call the police asap
But he did call the police before this whole thing started. My only thing is why did she try to cover it up… it’s completely irrational. In his call she sounds like the aggressor. However, she is admitting to killing him (in self defense) and cleaning up the scene. She didn’t call 911 . She lied to law enforcement… it’s weird but idk how ppl should react to their husband dying from a shoulder wound
Yeah I’m sure he wanted to die on purpose, where do you people come from?! Make the victim into the perpetrator, make the perpetrator into the victim, that’s what you people do…
Does this clown of a prosecutor think because he raises his voice is all he needs to do? Not a clue has he got
He is trying to provoke an angry outburst, hoping she will blurt out something incriminating.
He watched a lot of court dramas on TV
@@Miss_Deeds He certainly must have
This lawyer has the wrong approach and is doing no favors to his case. There are way better ways to cross
I can't stand his face and his overly dramatic gestures with his arms.
He is trying to get her to react....it means she has a strong case on HER side
I feel she was Married to a Narcissistic Step father
@@allyw1364 of corse you do!
You definitely deserve the name karen
Prosecutor says "I don't care what your thoughts are," immediately proceeds to tell her what he believes her thoughts were.
Brilliant prosecutor lol.
This prosecutor seems very unprofessional and hostile. And the judge appears not to be impartial. Can't stomach any more, I hope she gets a short sentence for not reporting. That's all.
this prosecutor is way over the top... practically screaming questions at her.
After watching these past two cases what’s up with these aggressive attorneys?
Are you...offended?
This is the look of someone who has nothing to hide and absolutely telling the truth. I’m happy she was found NOT GUILTY.
Whybshe clean and not call a Hurst or police
Me too
@@borisschellig6434 Freaked out and acting irrationally.
Oh ! So she was found NOT guilty ? Thanks for that feedback …. I’ve only just found this story and was trying to figure out what had happened …. 👍🙏
And yes …. I’m happy too that she was found not guilty …. She was clearly in shock and didn’t know what to do when she realised he was dead …. It was self defence ….
He’s like , quit telling the truth ! I can’t get angry if you don’t lie !
Absolutely correct. His entire strategy was trying to invoke a reaction out of her. In all honesty she was the star witness on her own behalf of the trial. I'm so glad she was acquitted
That short little prosecutor is an a-hole….there’s no need to be hateful and nasty. This is CLEARLY self defense!
But he’s just doing his job 🙄he’s not an a hole
Could you explain the entire case and how you believe this is "self defense?" Because she seems like shes lying to me
She’s so honest , and when your honest ,
He can’t break her or fumble her up ,she knows exactly what happened !
I don't know quite what to think about him yelling at her about not having wanted to be married to him for years!.....does he think that's a crime??
In cross lawyers are allowed to grill
he's not yelling. He's asking her questions
Not a crime, he’s trying to prove motive.
@@spongebob8445 he is yelling, if you can't acknowledge that, there is something seriously wrong with you.
Yes, that makes sense but it comes off as him implying that she’s not allowed to want to separate from an abusive husband. Yuck.
This is a perfect example of why…….. certain people should just not be admitted to the ‘bar’…… abysmal display of prosecution ability!
How so?
His intimidation skills were great, not sure if he proved anything.
He's intimidating, aggressive, and really needs to ask better questions. If anything, I think the jury is going to feel sorry for her!
(Update: looks like the jury did feel for her!) I'm glad they found her not guilty.
Notice how sad he sounded after the verdict came back? Aww poor guy... all that aggresive yelling didnt work in his favor. Live & learn dude.
@@lindasavary4407 exactly!
@@lindasavary4407 Very aggressive, not very substantive. His performance surely helped the defense, by not clearly justifying that aggression against an alleged survivor of DV.
this lawyer sounds desperate, exhaling dramatically when he doesn't get what he wants out of a line of questioning
He sent her to ER and she sent an email! The prosecutor is a bully!
Yeah he's a big brat.
He's grumpy -- he has no case.
He needs to take a breath….obviously oblivious to how he comes across 🧐
As I read this I am hearing the very loud breathing lol
Prosecutor is coming off way too aggressive instead of playing it cool and calculated. These things matter to the jury, likability matters, tact matters, presentation matters. This guy is going about it the wrong way.
Totally agree with you
Totally agree. He was very difficult to listen to. This shouldn't be a personal thing and this prosecutor is looking like he is taking it personally.
Do you have a law degree?? smh
@Janadu so you need to know how to bake to tell a good cake from a bad one? You are so utterly pathetic in your childish primitive logic and to feel compelled to attack a stranger for a valid opinion is disgusting
Is the jury supposed to like the prosecution? Just stick to American idol. Its more your level
Prosecutor has a menacing way of staring at her with his head down. His poor treatment of her makes her seem more sympathetic.
I agreed...
No actually it shows she is nonchalant and doesn't really care anymore
Also lawyers are allowed to grill within legal limits
It's cross, tho. Cross examination can get pretty hostile.
Agree , that prosecutor’s behavior is terrible…
Uncalled for , he acts like a bratty child making terrible faces etc. …
@@Zubair11230 obviously they’re allowed to, people are allowed to do a lot of things that aren’t in their best interest. And this tactic was not in his best interest, and it lost him his case. He was allowed to be a crappy lawyer.
The prosecutor sounds so angry. He sounds like a jerk. If I was on the jury I would really not respond well to him. He can ask the questions without being angry. Very unprofessional and like he watches too many crime shows.
I love this prosecutor - very precise & to the point & he's fighting for justice for Michael.
@ kim Williams......agreed he seems quite hostile in his demeanour and rude to the judge......its not a good luck
If it was your loved one dead! You would also want him to go hard on her. That’s his job, he’s not supposed to be her best friend
I would’ve liked to have seen this prosecutor go after Anthony Todt. If you haven’t seen that one, you gotta take a look.
yeah, it didn't work for Juan Martinez with Jodi Arias either.
I just stumbled upon this....I know nothing about the case. But she seems believable to me. The prosecutor does the Defense a favour by repeatedly mentioning how big and strong her husband was !
Sounds like self defense to me. The prosecutor behaved like a bully and seemed confused about the facts at times. She corrected him, even when it wasn't to her advantage to do so. Refreshing to watch a seemingly honest witness after watching A.H. on the witness stand. Would like to see the Behaviour Panel analyze the body language in this trial !
Nice to see her address the prosecutor directly instead of turning to the jury every time.
You are SUPPOSED to respond to the jury. That's what your lawyer will tell you to do. If no jury, you respond to the judge.
I have not watched this entire trial. She looks tired and broken, as though nothing matters anymore. In a situation like this, who would remember every smallest detail? The whole situation is just very sad.
Prosecutor is an over-actor.
He's not a litigator.
He should pivot into law enforcement....but, sadly, he would be a dirty cop.
Some One, I totally agree.
Exactly. She is a poor being, in trouble since childhood. No moment of peace yet
Maybe she can’t remember every detail since she has put out multiple different stories on how the evening played out. Also if she says that this was the worst incident they have had and she FEARED for her life how come suddenly she can’t remember the details of the most stand-out and life-changing event of her life. I can’t understand how people are so easily fooled
Have you ever experienced a traumatic event? It’s very difficult to get every little detail every time you have to tell the story, especially when you have to tell it a million times as I am sure she has had to.
Every time prosecutor exhales in frustration, take a shot
That prosecutor is crossing a line between assertive and aggressive. He needs to change his approach to keep jury on board with him in my opinion.
I can see that. Personally I'm turning this off after 7 minutes because I can't stand his attitude.
he needs to be more aggressive, actually, to underscore the gravity of her crimes.
@@TheOneanjel Guess he failed in his mission. She was acquitted.
@@TheOneanjel ggggggggyg TV go ggg
I’m not understanding what the prosecutor is ever trying to prove.. he is all over the place
This woman should thank the prosecutor for being acquitted😂. No defense attorney could have done a better job for her 🙈.
AMEN
And also the judge was very in favor of the prosecutor and not allowing any of the defense’s objections.
IKR!!!!! The prosecutor seems to be so angry for her egging his car!!!!!!!!!!!
The prosecutor is terrible. He’s almost in some sort of rage. She did a good job, up against him. I think it was self defense. Glad she’s free.
why is he screaming at her?! 😥
@@Meii652 Because he’s on Adderall 🇺🇸
I just started watching this trial now, I watched her testimony and now am in the middle of his cross examination. First off, he seems very aggressive in his questioning which doesn’t make a lot of sense, I know he’s trying to make her look guilty and trip her up and whatnot, but she’s being very calm and admitting her mistakes and seems to be telling the truth in every aspect, so his aggressive questioning doesn’t make much sense since she isn’t being uncooperative or trying to evade his answers. And secondly, again I realize it’s his job, but he’s asking for extremely specific detail on timeline and events, but if you’ve just endured such trauma there’s no way you’d be able to remember exact timelines, or thoughts, or tiny details like this. The fact that she is trying to remember and admitting if she can’t, and that when he makes a statement that she doesn’t feel is precise she corrects it with her being unsure of the exact timeline or details just seems to prove how trauma distorts your mind.
Her whole testimony comes across so honest, almost even to a fault. She really tries to remember before she just answers, she admits when she can’t remember exact details or timelines instead of trying to fake something which might help in the moment but come back to bite her later, she corrects him if she thinks he’s telling it incorrectly even if her correction doesn’t necessarily look favourable towards her. I feel awful for this woman and hope she gets to move on from this and live a good life.
He’s just doing his job and that’s how all prosecutors act
This prosecutor is too aggressive. I'm surprised the judge is allowing him to get away with all this badgering and snarkiness
He’s allowed to treat her as a “hostile witness”. Some Prosecutors don’t care if the defendant is actually guilty. They’re just trying to prove that they are guilty. The way he’s talking to her is pretty standard for when defendants testify. The beauty of it is that we can observe the interaction and recognize if the person testifying is truthful or not.
I don’t think he crosses any lines. I’ve watched many trials and this prosecutor isn’t that aggressive imo. He’s doing his job.
Have you ever seen Juan Martinez grill Jodi Arias and the psychologists on the defense side? Now that was aggressive. Arias deserved it though.
That's his job
@@sandipaws9372 I haven't been paying attention to this trial but to my understanding of evidence, hostile witness is the witness that the party themselves calls upon but when they appear they refuse to cooperate with their own party, in which case they will be classified as "hostile witness" and the very party that called them will cross examine them, something the opposite party should be doing ordinarily. Is that the case here?
Lol snarkiness … the first time I ever heard this was when Ben and Judge Penny said it at Johnnys trial and now I see it everywhere 😂 snarkiness lol it’s such a funny word to say out loud 😂 … and ur right, he is most definitely being snarky for sure lol even the way he stands when he’s listening to the 911 recording is snarky lol 1:32:03
She never intended to kill him. Who dies getting stabbed once in the shoulder? She was in total shock. I’m glad they found her innocent - he would have killed her otherwise…
This prosecuting attorney is a sociopath... the contrast of his hostile, graphic and detached questioning was such a stark contrast to the defendants rational, honest reflective responses. He could make a mass murderer seem 🤔 not so bad. The guy is in the wrong area of law... he should do corporate NOT criminal law. The guy"s personality disorder overshadows the defendants behaviors.
Not at all he’s just doing his job. It’s the whole point of the prosecutor to interrogate and intimidate. By interrogating her finds the truth. This is the whole point
@@artfull334 I agree, but his character defects are glaring here.
@@MissMeggypoo Yes that’s a fair point. It’s a difficult case, a domestic and their relationship looks like it became volatile both ways. I’m from the UK and I absolutely agree with the right to defend one’s own life no matter what and I respect the jury’s verdict.
But from an outsider looking in something just don’t add up with her story. I honestly don’t reckon her version of events is what happened. When I listened to her account and watched her body language my gut instinct is she’s not telling the truth.
If she was so scared of him why was she pelting his car with eggs ?
That's pretty much how all prosecuting attorneys cross examine....this is very tyipcal
She is speaking the truth. Unlike amber. She replies ‘yes’ or no so simply. No playing around the bush and she pauses to recollect some memories unlike Amber looking straight into the eyes of the jury answering without even thinking like typical liars do 🤣🤣🤣
This prosecutor is beyond hostile but more than that....where is he going with this line of questioning? To me, he's all over the place.
Edit: This guy could have his own show "How not to be A Prosecutor". The faces he makes has me in stitches.
Agreed!!!! 😂
He’s all over the map!
She is obviously so traumatised. I can see and so honest in her testimony. Hiding absolutely none. 💯
You mean because she can't even get her story straight during cross?
she is well rehearsed
She lied to the 911 operator--
She appears to be answering honestly. I know nothing about this case, but compared to Amber Heard, a person can tell the difference. I am feeling compassion for her because the details he is asking after killing someone I would imagine the brain would compartmentalize in many different boxes.
Honestly, I wonder if the wide-watching of the Heard/Depp trial will help with the way people approach testifying defendants. It's weird to see it here in the comments already. (Not you, specifically, because I have no idea, but) Law and Crime comments on a defendants' cross-exam are almost always saying the defendant is lying and guilty. It's cool to read the comments this time around and see a lot more diversity of opinion and better analysis (like yours) than I feel like I usually see.
@@jacksyoutubechannel4045 People are trying to compensate for engaging in the unmitigated, hateful, mob behavior in the Depp v Heard trial. The magnanimity won't last.
Thats true
Yes I agree with you she should have said I panicked and didn't know what to do
Imagine living in the same home with that prosecutor.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
After watching his facial expressions and his weird arm movements, no thank you. 🤣🤣 You said tonight was spaghetti for dinner, correct? So hamburger meat, right? 🤨
LoL! Oh Gawd !!!
You killed your husband, the father of your kids,
but hey look at me, I didn't kill and come across disgusting👿. Why don't you 😇 ?!
Egotistical, narcissistic, angry and lacking patience... All the makings of a killier.
And that's just the lawyer.
😂
And the actual killer.
The one who stabs someone, methodically cleans it up, surfa dating sites, waits 11 hours the tell various lies to the cops....
But the male lawyer is the narcissist because he's bit abrupt.
Female privilege is wild
Bahahahahaaa
Guaranteed former military.
Now read your comment again.
Lmao 🤣
The Prosecutor seems to be helping HER case w/every question & statement. I personally think she’s doing well as he try’s tripping her up…
Thankfully
His tone is so hostile and yet she handles it very well because she is telling her truth. The jury has to have seen and heard that.
I thought the same thing!!
@@sparrowsfriend I agree 100%
I was thinking the same, he got her acquitted. He (the prosecutor) also unfortunately looks like a Jim Carrey character, like the Cable Guy. He needs to switch from being a prosecutor to being a defense attorney. He’s a total f u c k u p
This prosecutor is really coming across as aggressive and over the top with his emotions. I personally feel like he’s been so aggressive that she backs into different answers to appease him and it’s gotta come across as such for the jury.
Backs into different answers to appease him? What?? Wha, what? 🤦♂️
Yes I agree that is what happens - he is an AH.
Agree 💯
@@wwfera00 Actually if you paid attention she does. It does come across as appeasing him and if she were in an abusive relationship it is quite common to do these things.
@@wwfera00 just remember; they don't have accountability. Delusion is an understatement.
In many respects, the prosecutor is stepping all over himself due to the power of his position. I just heard him say, "and you knew he was dead, didnt you? Ms. Redlick's response was yes. He tripped all over himself with that contradiction to grilling the defendant on the issue of citing each hour that went by that she could have called 911 and didn't. His point was continuous in questioning her ... Mr. Redlick could have been alive and she still didn't call 911. This guy needs to set his legal ego aside and back off from the power trip. His tactic is trying to get her to the point of an derogatory or sarcastic response because she is answering in a even.toned, non.agressive manner and just answering the questions equally. He needs to do the same because he is coming off as a brow.beater to me. Her attorney? He should be doing a lot more in objecting.
I'm so glad other people agree. I thought I was going to come down here and be alone on this one. A truly good prosecutor will be able to have people not watch a single second of the rest of the trial or know anything about the facts, and still watch their cross-exam of a defendant and think they're doing a good job. I've heard people defend prosecutors who do this poorly by saying, "You don't get it, they _had_ to talk to her like that," but you can watch a great many tense cross-exams with no other context and not need someone to explain their tone and line of questioning to you, because those were _actually_ talented prosecutors (see Jodi Arias, Stacey Castor, Donna Scrivo).
Agreed
Her attorney might be letting the prosecutor show himself to be a bullying a$$.
I kind of don’t think her attorneys did that great. The female didn’t present things well she seemed confused and jumping around she didn’t sound confident. Miss Redlick won this case for herself.
@@iprobablywontseeyourreply.7193 You are absolutely correct. She was her own star witness. You called it.
All he kept doing was telling her what she did instead of asking her what she did .
This lawyer is Too Aggressive and even if shes guilty, i dont think hes helping prove it with his Animated Aggressiveness
Same Happened Kyle Rittenhouse case
No he should be nice and kind to a murderous sociopath?
@@onyiiilo378 it doesn't look good for the jury because she plead not guilty.
@@mariee.5912 I am sure the Jury will see through her grey hair grandma appeal and her Oscar award winning acting.
The prosecutor sucks... He is helping her case for sure!!
There were moments I was literally trying to figure out if this attorney was working for the defense or prosecution.
This prosecutor looks like the type that would bent the rules and try to convict innocent people just to move up in his position.
Agree!
If you cant see through this clearly lying woman's facade then heaven help you.
@@judylane8901 I have not. Been following this trial. Her affect is too flat. My gut tells me she indeed intended to kill him & she was not a victim of DV. Will try to keep N open mind. Premeditated malice murder?
Not guilty guys
I agree, I wouldn't trust him to be completely honest. He's a bully.
This video should be the training reference for how a Prosecutor SHOULD NOT conduct a cross examination and an example for how important demeanour of the lawyer is.
When he approached her and was in her space turning the pages of the transcript I felt disgusted. He should never have been allowed to do such a thing. Others should learn from his mistake!
The prosecutor just made a great case for the defense! Thanks for reinforcing that this was self-defense. He's acting like a jerk.
As I keep finding out, the whole system is a huge problem. A lawyer who wants to prove her guilt and a lawyer who wants to prove her innocence. Actually, in such cases there should be lawyers who want to prove impartially and objectively what really happened.
That is true
We need third party impartial lawyers but I guess that is why there is jury system
That’s what the jury of 12 is for and no one can be convicted or cleared of impartiality or objectivity.
Isn’t that the job of police, in theory?
Some do not understand the essence of my statement. In such cases, facts can be found for each side. Due to the fact that both lawyers prepare their case with one goal in mind, regardless of what really happened, there is no objectivity. In the end, not even for the jury.
Do you not understand the jobs of a prosecutor and defense attorney?
This is why it’s so important to not judge until all information has been provided
Exactly because I would’ve thought she was guilty until I’ve seen her testify.
@@Niapt did they give the verdict? I heard the judge going over the forms but I haven’t heard a verdict yet? I also didn’t watch yesterday
@@AlexAndra-iy5zu she was found not guilty, only guilty of tampering with evidence she will be release!
@@Yum676 I saw that 🤗 I can’t figure out why they didn’t release her today? She’s done enough time to cover the tampering with evidence.
The fact he was stabbed in the shoulder does indicate it was probably during a struggle of some kind and not an attempt to necessarily kill him, but she should have dialled 911 as soon as she realised he was ether dying or possibly dead when she eventually went to check on him. Still on the fence about this one. It does look like self defence and considering it was in the shoulder I can understand why she might have felt still under threat and not suspecting it was a fatal injury. From London, UK
To me it implies be was walking away, and she saw all the money going with him...
Agreed but I believe after the fact she just didn't care enough to help. Possibly waiting for him to die or be certain he was dead before calling 911. I'm lost on this one but I believe there was a struggle.
She's a wack job, if she didn't want to be with him all she had to do was leave him! Instead she's a cold hearted killer ❗
@@mcshan1007 That's my feeling too, there's nothing to indicate she intended to kill him but I think when she realised he was dead she was probably in shock and maybe denial too hence her lack of action.
It makes no sense that she didn't call 911 - it didn't serve her in any way, it's only reflected badly on her. Clearly their marriage was over in all but name, and there was no love lost between them on either side. Once a relationship has reached this stage, continuing to live together is a bad idea!
@@thatsdifferent103 No not at All , she wanted him to leave , and live separate AGAIN !!!! This guy was a ticking time bomb and ABUSER !!!!! What a JERK !!
She didn't want to believe she could kill someone, let alone her husband. She hoped he died of a heart attack BEFORE he bled too death. In her mind she couldn't let go of that possibility
I would just hate it if someone hoped my loved one would survive without their help instead of helping them survive.
I understand what you’re saying. I agree.
What you are saying is illogical. If you have stabled someone in self-defence, and he’s lying on the floor in a pool of blood, you know you aren’t in danger. If you did do it in self-defence but didn’t want him to die, she would have left the house immediately and called 911. But to say the man she stabbed, lying in a pool of blood, has had a heart attack is insane! If she didn’t want him dead, she would have called 911, not mop up the blood with that huge bag of towels. Housecleaning would be the las thing on her mind?
@@wandakowalski7063 I don't quite understand the relevance but I think she's pointing out that Danielle HOPED not to be the killer, whether the injury she inflicted was in self defense or not. I can't help wondering why she had time to consider that before she fled the home and got help but her lawyer is GOOD pointing out that people handle trauma in different ways. I hope no one would argue that her reaction was certainly either logical or wise.
😆
I'm glad I'm not on that jury....that prosecutor would be getting on my nerves.....shock and extreme trauma make people do some strange things.
Really tired of the worn out trauma excuse even your trauma is your responsibility. Seek help befire things get to the point you kill someone and cause yourself for trauma.
@@davitaemanuel4878 You misunderstand....I'm talking about the shock and trauma of the incident itself not what led up to it
I think he realized he made a mistake when he indicated her. Instead of admitting he was wrong he is desperate to hide his mistake. A careerist is more interest in his own agenda than he is justice. I can forgive someone for an error in judgement especially when. They rely on cops for so much and cops are overwhelmed, often corrupt and have a notorious record for. DV in their relationships which taints their perspectives. However he chose to make the woman and her children collateral damage in behalf of his ego and future.whuxh is likely political in nature. The fact that he's do dim he can't see how much better he'd look admitting his mistake proves he has no business representing the people's interests. The last thing we need is another DA mayor Governor or federal puppet of his kind. .
That prosecutor is _very_ hostile & argumentative! The smartass way he speaks to her is ridiculous...
Everything he says to make her look bad only seems to make him look untrained & unprofessional yet ironically it seems to help her.
He reminds me of AHs team in
Depp vs Heard
This lawyer thinks he’s better than he actually is. 😅
1:24:41 🤣
Barney
100%
How good does he need to be when she admitted that she murdered him she let him bleed to death on his own kitchen floor she cheated on him and now she's sitting there looking arrogant how good does he really need to be honestly
Well, he IS much better than the defense attorneys.
Shes so cute. I think she did great job. Truth prevails. She was truthful even though she made bad decisions.
Love how that little furious prosecutor referred to it as an “egg-throwing incident” and not a “cell phone stealing incident which would have left you without a single other means of communication”. Like, oooooh the big bad eggs!
Haha Later on he’s all AH-HA “oh you mentioned the stovetop, is that the stovetop ms Redlick? And, what that just placed there on the stove top?”
Her: “its a lemon.”
Him: “…….”
Line of questioning ends.
Well the prosecutor is doing a very good job of making her come across as a battered woman.
U have to imagine how crazy ur head would go if u stabbed someone in the shoulder trying to get them off u and they died. I’m sure most of us think we know what we’d do next, but I bet few of us actually do exactly that.
That prosecutors demeanour when the judge recalled him up to her bench was very volatile + hostile.......rude
For sure! Dude needs to take a chill pill.
I strangely want her out of this, just feel he has been a jerk
wtf how are they not objecting that psycho banging his hand on his chest and clearly disrespecting the judge, the defense needs to object, badgering the witness
100% that prosecutor is on drugs, it looks like cocaine, he's out of his mind.
The prosecutor is disgusted that this woman is utterly empathetic after murdering a man. Then she goes on a dating site after cleaning the murder weapon. As well, the CPS worker stated she showed no signs of injury. I'd be disgusted as well talking to her.
so refreshing to see someone accused just answer TRUTHFULLY!
He's trying so hard to make her seem like a sly, manipulative monster to the jury. She, however, is none of those things. I'm rolling my eyes and shaking my head at him and I feel sorry for her.
I strangely want her out of this, just feel he has been a jerk
Yeah I think his tough guy strategy could possibly have the opposite effect that he’s hoping for.
@@marthawatkins7184 I think he's playing to the cameras. One of the most effective cross-examinationsof a defendant was carried out by Linda Koslowski in the McMichaels trial.
She is not so innocent too, sitting there for hours with her husband's body laying there , while playing around on dating apps is fishy to me.
Save your sympathy for her kids and for Michael who isn't here to speak for himself.
I’m from UK and televised trials are a new rarity. This is my first time watching a live murder case. I can only presume that the prosecutor is being snarky because he can’t get a rise out of the defendant? He sounds really angry and what is with all his huffing??
No he suffers from a VERY OBVIOUS personality disorder
He is trying to undermine her testimony, but it backfired. She does come across as unemotional and detached, but this could be a coping mechanism. She seems genuinely traumatized, as his attacks seem to stem from a deep dislike of the defendant. The grandstanding made him look like a bully, and the jury didn’t care much for the histrionics based on how the case was settled.
She might be a real victim, but her mistake is she didn't call 911 at once. She waited till the next morning. How can you stay for hours alone with your husband lying on a pool of blood, dead? This I can't imagine.
Yes and I think she is being honest when she said she was in shock but I also think she was in no rush to revive him because she was relieved when she realized she was dead
WELL IF THE GUY WAS BEATING THE BLANK OUT OF YOU, YOU MAY WANT HIM TO SUFFER A BIT. OR SHE IS STILL TRAUMATIZED AFTER SLICING HER WRISTS, CONFUSION. NOT THAT CLEAR CUT. STAB AND CALL
It’s called murder. Plain and simple
Who knows what we'd do in such a situation?
Because she realised she killed him. It's not that unbelievable that she wasn't confident to call 911.
I'm so glad this lady was acquitted. She seems like she's being truthful and this prosecutor is helping her so much! I'd like to be a fly on the wall later behind closed doors because hopefully he is put in his place for being such an aggressive man! She seems to truly be a victim and the way he keeps raising his voice and getting hateful has to be causing her PTSD!
His face looking at her... my god I know they're called prosecutes but do they have to be that aggressive. It doesn't trip up guilty ppl but innocent ppl must be so freaked out! Personally I wanna throw eggs at him he shouts questions out!!
Prosecutor is such a dic! This seems personal to him! He’s frustrated & it shows which means he’s on a witch hunt. She seems credible & that she has nothing to hide. She shouldn’t be on trial & I really hope this jury finds her not guilty!
This cross examiner is hostel , huffing and blowing out his breath !!!! I DON’T like this lawyer he has a bad attitude!!! He is very RUDE ‼️
Hes ok
He fine ,he is the there to hold her hand and be her friend. It's a murder trial.
Ya he did an awesome job 😆 glad she was found NG
He’s just doing his job. He’s supposed to interrogate the witness and poke holes in her defense
Rude?honey she is a killer do you want him to clap for her
This so-called lawyer could be the worst I have ever seen as far as I am concerned. I myself had an experience with a custody case over a family court for six years, but oh boy, this man has a serious problem, he doesn't sound a professional that a crimical can get away with murder in the end!
He needs practice with summary and main point!
This prosecutor is making her seem like a victim. She's being honest in her answers to him. She's not denying she said this or that. She's making no excuses for herself. In fact, she shows all the signs of a battered wife. I know I'm a DV survivor. I didn't stab my husband though, even though if I didn't get out when I did, anything could have been possible. My life or his.
She may have but I don’t think she is getting away with it. Why did she not call the police immediately
@@angelakwaramba9752 I agree with that. It's a possibility she was in shock. And if she really was a battered wife, she could suffer from PTSD. She did slit her wrists, which seems out of place if she intentionally wanted to kill him. Plus the stab was to the shoulder, not the chest that would be a well known fatal wound. I seriously don't know.
Victim hood is so prevalent these days. She murdered a man that was cheating in her. Case closed.
BINGO!!!! Likewise, also a DV survivor and 100% agree with everything you stated.
@Zero Two you understand that its not as simple as " just get out "
If she meant to intentionally kill him, she would've stabbed him somewhere else on his body instead of his shoulder. She was clearly trying to get away and protect herself from him, in my opinion.
So is that the only place she stabbed him was in the shoulder? How did he die from that wound?
@@amywilkins543 yep, that’s the only entry wound. He bled out within 6-10 mins and she had no idea as she was locked in the bathroom
@@amywilkins543 maybe an artery was severed .
@@amywilkins543 it was actually in armpit area. It hit artery and top of lung. She was locked in bathroom and he was making noise and yelling. I wouldn’t doubt if she came out and found him dead and thought the armpit stab triggered heart attack. He looked like perfect candidate for one. I would never think that would kill someone. There was blood trail and he was conscious ranting and raving. Surprised he didn’t dial 911.
I also think if murder was in mind she would’ve stabbed him multiple times.
That Judge is horrendous! How can witness to prior violence be not relevant ??? Shocking that would need to be explained to her 🙄 very unjust
It's very clear you don't understand how the law works...the past is irrelevant to his death that night.
@@farmerchick3040 It might be relevant for self-defence version. If he had had a history of violence against ex-spouses, the probability it might have been a case would be high.
Prosecutor is a little too amped up! Take it down a few brother.
I am glad she was acquitted. I am just watching this now after seeing the verdict the other day. It has been going on the same time as the Depp & Heard trial. My heart goes out to her and her family. Hope they can move on from this and make happy memories 😊.
Her daughter said she was guilty and a mass manipulator 😮
@@xoswatson351 it's funny how the husband couldn't defend himself in court...
This a woman who was literally afraid of her husband and was able to defend herself. How refreshing it is to listen to someone who tells the truth even though at times made her look bad, quite different from Amber.
@@jennleblanc4074 absolutely
It feels like the prosecutor is helping her win the case. Sounds like she was in imminent danger of harm and reacting in self-defense! 🤔
She lies are like Jodi and Ezra
@@jefferythacker8772 You must have not watched their trials. She is nothing like them.
@Blue Whiskers Well boohoo what do you see. She won't be in prison for life at all.
Yes, she is polar opposite of Amber Heard and Jodi Arias.
They did the familiar liar's thing of adding tons of pointless details, under the mistake of believing that makes lie more believable.
This woman is just simply stating things. And looking worn out, while this man shouts at her. Just like her husband did.
He also continually interrupts her.
Which is a big No No.
Notice the defense attorneys don't object.
They understand that he is making himself look bad - aggressive, shouty for no reason, and therefore making her more sympathetic. His colleagues probably know he's not helping, but he is too egotistical to listen.
Never stop your opponent when he is making a mistake.
Any timestamps where you believe they could have objected, and could you give a reason why they could?
If you know the law ,thats what prosecutors are paid to do, yell and be aggressive to make the accused yell and become angry at him, so that he can say that she killed him in a fit of rage , he is trying to trap her into saying things that are untrue , make her confused to submit, she has slipped up once already, when he asked her a question and quoted when you killed your husband, and she answered yes he got the answer he wanted you see she admitted guilt, prosecutors are very crafty at twisting things.
Oh my God do people HAVE to be like histrionics in order to murder no. Can they be smart and calm on the stand yes. Can they still be guilty of second degree murder Y E S
We must be watching a different trial.
@@SpaceyCortex I don’t have a time stamp, but the prosecutor asked her something along the lines of “and you husband still wanted to make the marriage work, right?” I think they could of objected on speculation grounds (how could she know for certain what he wanted at that time).
It’s in the first 20 mins
She stab her abusive husband in self defense and realized she had kill him by accident, she feel guilty so she lied to the police and people around her.
Did she lie? Yes!
Is she guilty? No!
Case close!
I wish she found peace after this trial after all she had gone through alot.
Uhh she did more than lie. She cleaned up the scene, deleted text messages that made her look bad and let him die.
@@KS-hi8vi this is his fault not hers
Isn’t it a no- brainer that if she was actually intending to kill him she would have stabbed him in the chest, throat, probably lots of times (a la Jodi Arias or tons of other stabbing murders- it’s always lots of stabs). You don’t just stab someone once in the shoulder if you want to murder them. She behaved strangely afterwards, sure, but at the moment of stabbing him, it’s obvious to me she didn’t intend to kill him. She was trying to get him to lay off of her.
Then why did she wait to call 911 when realizing what she did?
I totally agree with you. She was definitely in some state of shock.
I agree, you wouldn't necessarily be thinking straight after finding him dead from a stab wound to the shoulder.
Or she just wanted to stab him to hurt him and accidentally killed him.. It is still murder.
@@nanapam1267 probably cos she was worried. Worried who would look after her children now basically no parents. Btw I don't think she is guilty or not guilty.
She stood up well to cross. It seems the prosecutor is trying to suggest that she deliberately killed him and then made up a story later. It is clear to me that she acted to stop the threat of what he could do to her. Isn't that self defence? Also if you are know you are not guilty ,in that if him dying was not what you intended you are not going to say to a 911 operator "my husband is dead. I killed him". I'm sure she was in immense shock and had a myriad of reactions. Relief for not being dead herself, glad he had stopped what he was doing but mortified and shocked that he was dead ,and because she is obviously a very intelligent lady of course she is going to realise that the finger is going to be pointed at her from how things appear ; ie her being there with a dead body. I know it's the prosecutors job to be aggressive but the narrative he is trying to weave is not holding water to me. She was obviously operating from panic mode in the first 24 hours and will not be able to remember the distressing events sequentially. That is not how our minds work when under immense shock and distress.
shes a liar. she murdered him.
I fully share your opinion. It's actually not that hard to come to those conclusions, but some people seem to struggle.
Her own kids says she started the fights. the neighbours say they alway heard her.. she has history of violence but u totally believe she's innocent..??
Thank you
I stopped believing in self defence when she stated she left the knife with him after stabbing him and she run into the bathroom in a belief he would keep attacking him. She slipped there. If she believed he was still attacking her, she would have not left the knife there for him to use it on her. I believe she's lying, things didn't happen the way she describes.
it drives me crazy the attorneys walk away from the mic so much!! get bluetooth or mics attached to yourself so we know what your saying!!!
So diffcult for this woman to answer the exact sequence of events, her feeling, emotions etc, when she was in a state of shock and anxiety and bewilderment.
Where's my violin? 🎻
@@Janadu lol like she wasn't banging her step father or nothin
She let her husband die cleaned up the scene and deleted text that would make her look bad.
@@KS-hi8vi She did not really clean up, she messed around, disorganised, and stayed with the body. A true criminal would have hidden the body, cleaned up and made up some story. Her behaviour was so disorganised that it shows shock.
I think under such circumstance it is impossible for someone to know everything she is being asked. Like “did you feel his weight on your ribs?” What kind of question is that ?? She was being beat up, how can someone know exactly about each minute and each feeling and every singly thought process….. imposible!!!
I'm going to have to go to rehab because I'm absolutely addicted to YT channels like yours. Although, your channel is one of my top 3. Great work.
That prosecuter needs jailtime, what a sick person ! 😡 … rude, a bullie that abuses his power. Throwing the piece of evidence on the floor?! Shame on him!!! Sending good vibes and a lot of love to this tormented woman. 🌺😘
Jail time for the prosecutor ??? 😳🤔
Dude... who knows how all of us would react if we accidentally killed someone....
She was definitely in shock
This judge is so biased its disgusting, not allowing a witness to show that her husband had a history of being violent. She is probably screwed because of this judge. Sad really. It should be fair for both sides
She's CLUELESS about the law.
She's skating on ego to cover-up her ineptitude.
One side is dead so can't defend himself. It's clear you don't understand how the law and court works. It's a criminal trial and they restrict evidence from the past for a reason.
@@farmerchick3040 Did you know that one of her witnesses was there and actually witnessed violence to story that this lady testified to, but the judge denied that witness to testify in front the jury. That's BS.
@Suddy ,I completely agree with you, there has been quite a few times that the defendant's lawyer objected and the judge overruled It couldn't believe it .In a case like this most definitely they should allow witnesses to testify especially allow evidence of domestic violence to me that is what this case is about ,did she have to defended herself?Or is it murder , how can the jury make a proper decision without ALL the evidence SMH. I agree I also think the Judge may be a bit biased especially her decisions on these objections by the defense.
I hope her lawyer appeals on those grounds
This lady is very believable. I don't have a dog in this fight, just saying that the Prosecutor isn't accomplishing anything with all the badgering. You didn't catch her in lies dude, stop acting like you revealed something.
I don’t think it’s a matter of did she do it, but is it murder or self-defense.
She's very frustrating to the prosecutor. He can't trick her into confessing to murder. She is very careful to make her responses truthful.
Over-actor.
He's not a litigator.
He should pivot into law enforcement....but, sadly, he would be a dirty cop.
@@lisae3663 I believe in the opening statement from the defense attorney when he started questioning her that he said she did stab him, but in self defense. I need to watch the direct again, but, the thing I find odd is that she was able to grab a knife while being pinned down and being unable to breath to stab him so easily - but I’m unclear if it was even a knife that he was stabbed with.
@@lisae3663 yes I understand that, but his follow-up questions are posed as if "I gotcha!" when he didn't "get her".
I thought she is was guilty at the start of this trial, after her being on the stand I believe everything she says
Me too. I'm glad she was acquitted and can go on with her life.
Who took the knife out of his body? Did anyone ask that? He probably pulled the knife out when she ran away and that’s what killed him. He bled out because he stupidly pulled the knife out. You’re not supposed to pull the knife out.
Good point well made!
Good point.
The Judge seems confused. And the Prosecutor is a jerk. And ruined his own case
I see a very frustrated prosecutor, defendant being very truthful and honest, not the kind of reaction the prosecutor was gunning for...
If he had any sense or good judgment, I would think he would have realized that early on, but Nope! He just keeps keep it up as his tactics and attempts keep backfiring in his face one after the next. Geez!