Bryan Kohberger Accuses FBI of Hiding Evidence in Fiery Hearing: 'Utter Nonsense!'
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 май 2024
- Bryan Kohberger's lawyers have accused prosecutors in Latah County of trying to "hide" the fact that the FBI hasn't turned over some documents in the case. In a hearing this week, prosecutors argued that an upcoming hearing about discovery be closed to the public. But Kohberger's defense team argued the hearing should be open to the public so they can see what hasn't been turned over to them. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy looks at the biggest moments from the hearing, what the disputed evidence could be and what the state is saying about Kohberger's possible alibi in this episode of Crime Fix - a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.
Get 50% off of confidential background reports at www.truthfinder.com/lccrimefix and access information about almost anyone!
Host:
Angenette Levy: / angenette5
Guests:
Bobby Chacon: / bobbychaconfbi
Andy Wilson: / andy-wilson-ab9823296
Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork
#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Get 50% off of confidential background reports at www.truthfinder.com/lccrimefix and access information about almost anyone!
This trial is too much for this indecisive judge.
but not too much for this indecent judge.
There’s something about the side smirking and constant smiling that just makes his rulings consistently lack the needed amps a judge a case of this magnitude *requires.*
He literally engages as if they are at a high school reunion, or if he were a school principal and speaking to the parents of students whom were caught smoking pot in the bathroom.
Just that small town buddy buddy, highly unprofessional vibe…
He has yet to prove himself worthy of this case IMO.
@@LiLHarOak 💯
So true
Come on people‼️The judge will act differently, much more cautious from what we are used to because this is a death penalty trial.
What kind of Judge is this?
Get this done, man.
This is a death penalty case, and needs to been seen,.
You didn't watch the video. This is just a hearing. Also, the judge said it would start closed but would open it up if that was appropriate. There is so much misinformation being spread...
@iansane1928
You're that rare commentator who bothers to pay attention.
Props.
JJ is extremely biased. Not only helping the state to hide evidence from the defense, he is also helping hide from the public
literally everyone in the close circle are more guilty. BK's GPS alibi is 100x better and stronger than the fake " frozen shock phase"🙄
Absofrigginlootley!!!!
This guy is acting like he is in charge. It’s time the judge gets tough or give the case to another judge!
well somebody has to be in charge beside The Rabbi Thompson...
and it sure ain't The Judge In Name Only.
What one that will just convict because that is what you want? FFS
@@stevenmoore3480 He is guilty AF
@@trumpialightning1691 I've already told the FBI I think it was you... GUILTY of being a worm.
@@stevenmoore3480 Better yet, put him in the prison's general population and let the inmates be the judge.
Worst judge for such a case
Facts!! Watch him get off too. Reasonable doubt
TOO BAD JUDGE JUDGE LAST NAME WASN'T DREDD
They need the Murdaugh judge. That man didn’t play.
He’s more interested in not making either attorney mad and remaining friends than doing his job!
@@lovinglife419OMG right!!! I loved him! He was so calm, fair, sharp and decisive! Excellent judge!!! He retired though. Too bad he was amazing to watch!
it better not get sealed i’m looking forward to watching this trial
This is about a certain hearings not the trial
I will be beyond glued to the phone. Lol
I think this judge is very uncomfortable with the fact that this is a death penalty case, so he’s indecisive and can’t rule.
He is indecisive because he knows AT is right but he needs to support the discretion of the much larger investigation these murders got involved in. He knows he cannot open pandoras box. But legally he should.
he looks pretty comfortable in his big ol chair 😂
You may be right but I also think he’s more concerned about remaining friends (or at least civil) with both sides. No spine.
damn i cant write anything they just 💨 it before it posts
I think there should be a new judge. But at the same time this judge wants to make sure everything is done right so there are no chances of a mistrial or an appeal. Even with the Parkland school shooter trial, after the defendant pleaded guilty, there was still a lot of red tape and delays for the penalty phase trial and took four years. So it's a long process which sucks for the victims.
This trial will be insufferable.
Lack of evidence
If I were on the jury, I’d have to vote not guilty. There’s not enough evidence. I’m sorry but there’s a reasonable doubt.
@@angelabordack Oh, a knife with his DNA was left at a party months ago and just wandered into the bedroom? A tall man with bushy eyebrows just happened to be there that night walking down the hall right after the screams and crying? Bryan just really enjoyed one of his late night rendezvous with the stars that night? His background and troubles w other students was 'just normal'? His survey was simply an interested student? Circumstantial evidence supposed to be weighed as evenly as you would hard evidence. You simply take the totality of it collectively to form a picture of the crime.
@@angelabordack the trial hasn’t start yet so yall don’t know all the evidence and the forensic explanation behind it. Is extremely irresponsible and naive of anyone giving their opinion before the trial has even started. Innocent or guilty. WE DONT KNOW! No one knows! We will only know if this trial is actually allowed to start.
@@angelabordack The public hasn't seen anything. We only know about the tip of the iceberg. There's somuch that we'll learn for the first time in trial. Maybe on both sides.
What does the prosecution have to hide? The dangerous thing is this could happen to any innocent person.
girl u thirsty
The prosecution is not hiding anything. Law Enforcement is.
Lol, they all are. The prosecution wouldnt be doing this if le was hiding info.
@@kenw2225 The prosecution wouldn't know what they have...
probably more evidence that makes your parasocial boyfriend guilty
This judge need to go!
Why is the state so embarrassed to have an open hearing? I thought you got the right guy!
This is the first time I ever heard the state complaining "facts are prejudice against the state"🙄
Because they lie. Jan 6 was a lie. Can't trust the state judiciary or government.
They know they didn't get the right guy, but he's the ONLY guy now since the investigation is closed. Their back is against the wall and they don't know what to do besides secrecy and suppression.
Because they got the wrong guy!
Exactly Bingo
ok karen
And after airing all that info the defense will argue that the jury pool has been tainted.
They will be. No matter where this trial takes place. They need someone to blame.
The public is different than media. You see here in this channel too they do not represent court documents as those are written. They picture own narratives.
The judge, the prosecutor, the police, the coroner etc etc are all alumni of the college. That screams that this trial needs to be held elsewhere! BK is being railroaded by a corrupt system.
Seems like a lot of prosecutors around the country have gotten into the habit of hiding stuff.
*law enforcement
Well, it didn’t hurt Kamala Harris, did it?
I’ve noticed that.
@@toomignonrelax homes
I have a feeling this has been going on for sometime, it’s only recently that we have the livestream hearings and trials that have made us aware.
What a circus!!!
Barnum & Kohlburger
We need the same kind of judge that is overseeing the Daybell case.
Or the Stauch and Shabusiness judges!
Or the one who sentenced Alex Murdaugh and Shanda Van Ark
they need to bring judge ito out for this case
Or the one who oversaw Darrell Brooks.
i guess youtube doesn't want judge ito on the case case they yanked my reply and probably this one to
It’s scary to see how much people are willing to support the STATE/ prosecutors blindly. Everyone deserves a fair trial - so many innocent people end up in jail due to corrupt prosecutors who need convictions for their careers
Pple who didnt follow this from day 1,literally,have missed lots of inaccuracies. Brett K death, nobody had heard of him, BK left hrs before with Father fir xmas vac. Was folliwed under surveillance. Prosecutiin got warrant sesrch BK apartmnt. Bodycam v sus in that, turned off. Seemed acted out. D daniels?? Thomson interviwrd outside apartmnt said PCA would be sesled due to CI witness protection and info to cause harm stress to Families.?? Always thought that was?? CI means witness does not need to appear in court. 🚩🚩 Lots of things made No sense.B Kopacka case totally closed. I felt need to explain Why so many cant trust this process.
If you don't support your own elected public servants you are undermining the integrity of the system. You can't fight the system from the outside by assuming it's corrupt. You are malingering.
brian isnt one of them
@@horvathsogranfume658 if true, then the state should show its evidence without fear
@@horvathsogranfume658you cant accuse somebody without hearing the trial or at least watch the evidence, your moral compass is broken
Remember in a previous hearing Ann said she has more to his alibi and she will be happy to release it when she gets what she has been asking for from the state
Funny, that’s not how that works.
@@twinkletoes6290lol exactly. The whole point of an alibi deadline is so you can't wait on evidence and tailor your story around it. We're waiting to see the discovery because Kohberger still hasn't figured out what he was doing that night.
That is not how it works. The purpose of an alibi is to clear a suspect's name and allow police to further investigate the crime and find the real murderer. Not giving an alibi is the same as obstructing justice from being carried out.
YAWN. And take those taped-up Kohberger and Bundy posters off the ceiling above your bed, perv.
@@cjking4511 The guy who spent 16 yrs behind bars for armed robbery had proof he was far away at the time. A jury still convicted him. He was going home after visiting his mother for a traffic stop and got shot and killed by the cop. Sometimes alibis just aren't enough.
If you have nothing to hide then why make it private
And I 100% agree with Ann Taylor.
I have one question!!!!!
IF NOT BRIAN THEN WHO......WHERE DO THEY GO FROM THERE?
You're implying that someone has to go down for it no matter what? Even if they may be innocent?
No if he's innocent, they need to still be investigating. IMO, they should have never torn the house down@@hydrostatic8048
@@hydrostatic8048yes they don’t care who goes down for it
@@hydrostatic8048 does that same standard *NOT APPLY TO BRYAN AS WELL??!?*
gee. Dylan Mortenson Quinn Kelly Demetrius Robinson.
Better open everything
That would BLOW YOUR MIND!
Are you ready for that?
I am not. Not even.
STOP WITH "BRYAN"! It's Mr. KOHBERGER! He's not a child or anyone's friend here! Taylor makes me sick!
@@brendamiller4078 he's been 'Cleanberger' to me since 2023. has it been long?
The Elantra design never changed. Someone should point that out.
You would think the FBI expert would know what he was talking about. 2011-2013 Elantra. He would have his reasons for saying that.
Still hasn’t 😂😂😂 lol that ish has been the exact same since I had one in 2013! Lol maybe the trim and grill changed a bit? But also maybe not.
Ummm don't make uneducated comments - ALOT of changes to the exterior regarding light placements and shape
@@dougcorcoran5455 It is what it is regardles of what anyone SAID it is.
yeah but most vehicles attached to crime-evidence aren't photographed without tires OR!! on jackstands....
The defense is doing their job, the judge is the problem...
I think this judge is WAY over his head 😊
Kohberger was probably banking on that being the case. Tiny town with a judicial system not prepared for something of this magnitude.
@@jori7398🙄
He is
I think the DA is struggling with evidence. It's not the judge. It seems more like an inadequate prosecutor. Santa needs to get his fracking crap together.
&&;;b;;@@Annie497
That car was not his. There was a person getting away with murder
There wasn't a car. The most likely killer lived 30 seconds away by foot.
@@turnbuckle go back to 4chan
The prosecution should like a weak alibi....right??? This whole thing is very suspect
Say he is innocent. The thought that the killer(s) is still in the community chills me to the bone.
Yeah, but he's not...
Knowing what type of people live in this part of Idaho should be enough to chill you to the bone. We call them Butler’s Boys
@@df56gh4d5h yes he is. no one person could savagely murder 4 people especially when Ean was 6ft tall and athletic, also his girlfriend was athletic, and she fought back. The murders i believe were planned it wasn't a lone wolf and BK wasn't involved.
This gentleman's commentary is excellent. I've been a lawyer for 40 years. This guy knows his stuff
What does Anne Taylor know that is being hidden here? Why is evidence being hidden from the defence at all? Why in the world did the survivors call their friends to the murder scene before the Police? Do we have the defences explanation of the DNA evidence? What is Bryan’s motive?
If you was a lawyer you'd know. The state knows they have the wrong guy. The roommates killed them. I went to school with them. Everyone knew 3 hours after it happened
@@MasterNoob.3.3.3.4.5.girl tell us more....u seem so...sure
He doesn't need a motive. Two words....Ted Bundy
@@MasterNoob.3.3.3.4.5. Then why aren't you going to police? If you and everyone else knew the roommates did it why did you keep your mouths shut? I call bullahit
@@lovesmesomelilacs-ke5rzSet up
the one guy who didn't know the victims, the one guy who didn't split town afterwards, the one guy who couldn't have had a motive, and the one guy who they can't show was actually in the area at the time....
that's definitely gotta be your guy.
scary stuff man. not even enough for a probable cause hearing, that's why they went with a grand jury indictment because it allows the prosecutor to bully the grand jurors behind closed doors in secret.
Dylan really screwed up trying to set this guy up.
@@timewa851 That "frozen shock phase" hits different.
😂😂😂 Great points. I love the sarcasm.
They need a judge with a backbone.
Having a Judge that is more interested in remaining friends with both sides is really unprofessional!
Judges, prosecutors and cops are insulated they don't face consequences for cover ups and lying for each other its called qualified immunity.
Nice to see a lawyer fight for their client at least. In the town I live in they are all buddies and work together to screw the accused over.
It’s one thing fighting for your client but AT keeps changing their minds & it’s been seen as a delay tactic; first she wanted a speedy trial, then not. Then they didn’t want cameras in the court - now she does. Look how long it took to hand over his “stargazing alibi”
@@kim8946Shes delaying? How many times have they asked for discovery from the prosecution? They literally told her to be patient and wait till the deadline in Sept as if she hasn’t been patient enough...she’s trying to move this along and they won’t hand over the very evidence that apparently got him arrested???
@@GardeningGemsdid you not even watch the video? They discussed that. AT is claiming the defense is withholding things and even the judge confirmed they weren't. It just takes time because they have to get stuff from other LE agencies...you're spreading a lot of probably false misinformation. Misinformation debunked BY THE VERY VIDEO YOU ARE COMMENTING ON.
Horse trading.
Like the Karen Read trial?
There’s so many cameras around yet the police give us a blurry picture of the car which is very suspicious. And it’s not even a clear picture
That LE didn’t even protect the footage via a canvas themselves. A night manager had a “hunch” & went through it. I’ve seen their work, it’s laughable.
It's widely known that surveillance cameras are notoriously bad and blurry. No reason to suddenly expect them to be crisp and clear just for this case.
@@patriotpeasant199we don’t even know that’s the Elantra. That person found it, thought it might be the car, and released it. LE never confirmed they believed that was the car of interest
Police haven’t released a picture of the car. That blurry picture is from a gas station worker who saw it on their surveillance footage and thought it might be it
The car evidence is the most thin and scary part of this case. They have no positive ID on the car. They can't match the year and model. The video also doesn't show who's car it is. Very scary stuff.
The judge named judge smerking. The chief of police smiling when this all began. What could possibly be so funny about all this?
If they used the cast report in the PCA, then why dont they have it?
They are lying.. don’t want to get caught working backwards.
It’d show how they reverse engineered it all & prob broke their own “laws”.
@LS-ny8mr They may be lying. It smells of corruption. No court in the USA should hold blackout court hearings. What is the hidden agenda? All courts will hold silent secretive hearings & withhold information from the paying public. We may as well be witnessing the beginning of the 4th Rrich. Everyone is vulnerable. Apply for a job give blood & urine samples & the next thing you know you are arrested & in a nightmare secretive court. The taxpayer is unknowingly complicit in crimes against humanity.
They didn’t use the *FBI CAST* report in the PCA… the PCA has Brett Paynes report… Brett Paynes *CAST* report *ONLY.* Brett Payne is not a trained FBI CAST analyst or anything of the sort! He merely was given pointers on *”how to conduct a CAST report,”* and that is what wound up in the PCA.
@@LiLHarOakBrett Paynes didn’t ever do a CAST report. You are confusing things
Me looking 👀 at my thousands of dollars I spent for random telescope 🔭 nights
Dude is on another planet, and I buy nothing of what Anne Taylor has to say. Wasting everybody’s time & $$
you don't want the trial to be public? that's weird
It’s her job to do that.
It's how she intends to win is by bull shitting.
So he's a little weird. Doesn't make him a quadruple murderer.
Everyone has the right to examine the evidence used in their trial.
Bryan Kohberger got too deep in his studies, and Satan got the best of him🙏''
disgusting at how out-of-control this whole debacle has become. The prosecution is lame and the defense is the typical grandstanding bloviator. Justice delayed is justice denied. The families have to watch this fiasco while never getting a resolution.
In the long run it's not being delayed yet. These are issues that need to be addressed to reduce the chances of appeals dragging this into the 2030s.
He is guilty
Case needs to be dismissed disgraceful from the prosecution and fbi plus the fact it will be impossible for him to get a fair trial
@@southerncross9302 would be most effective IF prosecution gave the defense the evidence they used in probable cause
@@marcust123 Why would it be impossible for him to get a fair trial?
The integrity of this case has long been in jeopardy, does that prosecutor not realize this or not care. I laughed out loud when she said "The state has nothing to hide." Every day this case has me shaking my head and wondering why the prosecution as well as the judge keep blatantly blocking the defendant's right to a fair trial.
Regardless of peoples personal opinions/feelings (more-so us as the public, who have no connection to case, except for interest/research/empathy/guilt or innocent pov) He absolutely needs a public hearing. So much BS on social media, chinese whispers, selective hearing, and let's be realistic, at this point, more questions than answers. Some issues in this case don't make sense at all, and NO i'm not in a BK fan club , just a fan of legit justice, true facts, real evidence, and all cards on the table. Even the families deserve an open legit trial. When it happens, make it happen properly, for both state & defence.
Public hearing and public trial are two very different things!
I'm waiting for a reply loser
YES! 🙌🏼
I cant stand hearing, “Judge Judge”
This guy lucked out and got the one public defender in this country that gives a hoot about her criminals defense.
So true!! I was thinking the exact same thing. Most just rush u to a plea bargain then u get to eat everything proseuction wanted to begin with and ur defense attorney goes out to lunch with the prosector when done. I've got the utmost respext for ann taylor!
Not really. She thinks this case will make her famous and she'll get paying clients
@@nopetfout5426 doubt it. She works for the state. The main reason attorneys take that job, most likely the only reason, is because she wants a job in the DAs office because she seeks a career in politics. She would make more money as a paralegal in a defense firm, if a job as a personal defense attorney is what she wants, there are much more direct paths to take. Maybe I'm wrong, but she is much more likely to be working as an assistant DA somewhere in a few years than becoming a partner at a defense firm, although i highly doubt she'll be working anywhere near that DA. You are right about one thing, furthering her career is definitely her number one priority. Any way you slice it, he lucked out.
@@nopetfout5426 She was already known.
Why does Taylor care what the media thinks?
It puts pressure on the politcal gang in Washington at the DOJ/FBI.
the jury would be people that see/consume the media just as you do - it mainly leans against him in case you haven't noticed.
So the truth is exposed. She doesn’t so much *”care what the media thinks.”* she *cares what the media reports.* which would be *the truth,* not their spin or theories based on what little info they have to speculate on.
NO ..... The prosecutor just said, It's mostly inconclusive information that is to be discussed, so THE AVERAGE PERSON WON'T UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT, PROSECUTOR SAID IT WILL CONFUSE PEOPLE, (PARTS) SO ITS WHAT ANN TAYLOR WANTS - BECAUSE SHE'S NO ZERO DEFENSE AND CONFUSION COULD HELP THE DEFENSE 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
You need to learn how to listen. The public and media are different entities. Different interest on people constitutional rights.
"We will provide".... Why haven't you done it yet? 🤦🏻♀️
All of a sudden, the prosecution cares about Bryan Kohberger getting a fair trial. HAHAHAH!!
Why then was the sheath there?? Explain that defense
Yawl have to wait till the TRIALLLLLLLLL!
It was "placed" there
@samanthastewart9819 ask officer Payne HE KNOWS.
The defense has already, a long time ago. It was a broad statement saying it was “placed” there.
lets remember it took 2 lots of testing before the "touch" dna was found. Touch dna is so minute, but even after a 1st test, then bagged up for another test, it was still enough to confirm a link to BKs dad, then BK. Damn that touch dna must have been made of strong stuff. Hey I'm no BK fan, but there are a lot of questions here. Some things defo don't add up. Let's be realistic and not let emotion or social media speculation cloud judgement. He's entitled to his day in court. He may very well be guilty, but majority of evidence and facts haven't been made public, regardless of what social media professionals may spout.
why is everything so secretive in this case????
Because it's all a frame job in a little town owned by a University afraid of bad PR.
Because they are stalling so that it becomes a cold case, after bryan gets found not guilty. Theyll keep saying the verdict was wrong and just run with the narrative that the bad guy got off. All to deflect that they never went after the real perps. Thats the whole thing here. Dont expect any answers for at 15-20 years unless some internet slueths solve it themselves
I have been watching this case for so long when will it end
Years 😢
The worst part.. it hasn’t even started🤦🏻♀️
Trial probably wont start until next year
It hasn't even been 2 years yet. It just seems like forever. Most high profile cases take 3 to 4 years before trial starts.
Maybe you should get a job
In the beginning, I thought he did it. But now, I'm not 100% sure. There's some things that just don't add up right. The video of the car, the DNA on the sheath, his alibi, etc. But the defense is right - Bryan has already been found guilty in the public eye - most people already think he's guilty. What if he's not? Think about that, if he's really not guilty and police just ran with "this is possible, let's do it" ...then the killer has been out there this whole time without a care in the world. And that's terrifying to think about.
That's why Santa Claus is shitting bricks.
Exactly what they want
If the guy took actual pictures of the night sky at odd hours of the night, then he is definitely an amateur astronomy buff. That, alone, makes me rethink what I once thought was a slam dunk case. I AM into astronomy, and his going away from the city lights in the wee hours before dawn is a common thing for us. The prosecution needs to get their act together and stop trying to find a scapegoat. They need to PROVE it was him, or justice won't be served.
@@Annie497 Leonids meteor shower.
@@W1ZY The prosecution is desperately trying to suppress and seal anything that would exonerate BK. Scary stuff.
Think he is enjoying this, I'm surprised he's not defending himself, he has been studying Ted bundy. Anne from Scotland
hes a covert narcissist not a grandiose one like ted
@@scorpionic-night If you had the professional/educational qualifications to determine that, you still wouldn't be able to say it about a complete stranger you've never interacted with lmao
@@just-a-generic-username ikr. Kohbergers probably guilty but I’m so tired seeing all these analyses about his psychology and personality. The man has said 2 words into a microphone
I watched the entire hiring and the Prosecution & JJ has more to do with the hold up and draging alone then the defense. And the more Ann Taylor and her team says Bryan is innocent the more I start to believe it 🤔
This is gonna be known as the trial of the decade
Nope. That will remain Depp v Heard.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508disagreed
@@littlemisssunshine5305 Actually you may be right. It's possible that it will be overtaken by Baldwin in July. But this won't get close.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 depp v heard LOL trial of the decade for pop culture. for true crime fanatics it is this.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 No, that will be overtaken by the Diddy trial if he gets charged.
if the state doesn’t have the cast report, how do they know brian was in the area?
think they have it but pretending they don't quite have it.
Sy the cell guy will smoke all of it at trial
@@timewa851ahh yes the guy with an associates degree that lied about his own credentials.and a podcast peddler. What a trustworthy source.
His dna on the literal murder weapon holder? Lol. About 10000000000x more damning than cellular evidence. 5 quintillion to 1 or something? Enough DNA to create a complete male profile. You people can’t be this dense right?
@@iansane1928 yep, been testifying for prosecutors for decades. cop, intel IED locator in iraq, now he's working on this case. NOT for the prosecutor for a change.
It's going to be a crazy book one day! Ka Ching!!
@steppedon Murder weapon? Knife sheath don't kill, "Touch DNA" testing also may be causing false convictions and wrong results.
How long is this going to go on for?
For too long, if you ask me.
For as long as it takes. This is nothing, there’s loads of cases that take way longer.
Minimum 4 years from the date of the crime
He’s doing his best to exhaust everyone, someone needs a strong hand here
Yep the longer it takes the better it is for the defense. He knows he is guilty so him and his lawyers want to drag it along as long as possible.
Ah...entitlement!! The judge needs to grow a pair and get this trial moving!
‘You can’t always get what you want!’
I am still so surprised that legally they are putting so much stock into assuming someone always have their cell phones on them. If someone was planning to murder someone, wouldn’t they be more likely to not bring their phone and if they know this information would be looked at, would plant their cell phone somewhere else?????
Yes, even Latisha Stauch left her phone at home while driving to hide Gannon's body.
And it would be up to the prosecutors to PROVE that is what happened...
Open the hearing judge, Bryon is due a public hearing and due process!
Who's Bryon?
@@stevethompson5168It's probably spellcheck kicking in, or typo. It's happened to me loads, or commenter may have spelling issue. I doubt it was done intentionally
He's due a public trial when his trial actually begins. These are pre-trial hearings and both sides agreed for these proceedings to remain closed to the public. To suddenly make some or just a small part of this case open to the public now would be a mistake. Whether or not cameras are allowed, the case will become public record.
@@stevethompson5168 Byron! He meant Byron! Great poems!
@@bexuk1825 Definatly on purpus! lol
I will never understand how a truly innocent person could sit in prison and the courtroom year after year and seem not to care how long this whole thing takes. It just seems to me that a truly innocent person would have wanted this whole case to get going months and months ago. If you were innocent and could prove why you're innocent, i don't think you'd ever reject a speedy trial. At least that's how I see it.
You’ve clearly never been in the position of the state vs you in a criminal case. A speedy trial means you can’t get all discovery, bring in experts nor gather all evidence in your favor. That’s why you almost never see one when the stakes are so high. Ever. You have a right to it but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do, you know?
This is a death penalty case. Why would you want to rush a case that has a high potential of you being sentanced to death if you're found guilty? I would want it to take as long as necessary for the defense team to get all their ducks in a row and look at every possible angle. Things get missed if they rush
Cut the crap. He has been sitting quietly in jail for a year and a half. If he were not guilty he would be pushing for release everyday.
Not quite. Only 16 months.
If you been paying attention at all, you’d realize that he’s been pushing to elongate this case.
*HE HAS BEEN REQUESTING OVER AND OVER … 15 TIME OVER FOR A REPORT JUDGE JUDGE FINALLY SIGNED A SUBPOENA FOR ON BEHALF OF THE FBI.*
It is *NOT* the defense holding up this case, nor is it the defenses job to *prove his innocence.* had the state followed through with a preliminary hearing, he may have been able to discredit *every bit of what the state* presented. However they not only went with a Grand Jury… they also went with a *Federal Grand Jury.*
Now, the only option he has *IS* to wait for trial with all asked for discovery, prepared to discredit the theory of the state.
That's not how things work
I wonder if Kohberger is intrigued with how the whole scenario is playing out, similar to watching a chess game between two amateurs. Is he amused?
Kohberger looks more evil in each subsequent video. As if evil itself is embodying his identity now that he's in jail. Chilling.
real. hes scary.
You are a sad human being. Looks have nothing to do with it.
Nah, that's just your imagination.
There should be no case held behind closed doors!
So if someone is in a remote area on a regular basis and defense has sky photos targeting him there on different occasions, that’s not evidence?
Judge judge needs to grow a set of
Why did he smile and smirk? Four people died. This is his biggest problem. His own attitude.
WOW
The judge must be removed!
So you don't want there to be a trial before 2028?
What a joke
Screw chilling out. That's what the courtroom is about. A mans life is on the line. Sure, four are dead, but what if it wasnt him? Judge, Judge is blatantly siding with the prosecution.
Yupp. It's disgusting
I agree . Those roommates are getting a pass too easily . And BK is entitled to his rights . Regardless ..
DNA speaks volumes - just saying -
They should take the death penalty away.
@@govindagovindaji4662
They might if he takes a plea bargain.
How does someone prove they're by themselves, when by the very nature of being alone means there are no witnesses?
He does not need to prove it, but if he is simultaneously at or near the crime scene, his items are found under a victim, his mobile devise switched on/off to strange times ecc. then this is called curcumstantial evidence. So it is not enough to say "I was watching the stars and the moon" if the rest points to you.
There are digital witnesses.
That's not a thing @@amireallythatgrumpy6508
Bc it's a weak alibi.
@@lilg2300 wrong.
he won't get away with this crime.
the four crimes aren't his. He will wind up settling for an undisclosed yuGe sum.
You gotta pay attention to understand the corruption going on there since that very early morning in middle November.
BK deserves $ million payout after this
He will
@@theconfusingchannel3170 I feel a guilty verdict headed his way. I have a right to my opinions too. And if you don't like it, respond to posts you do agree with... He is not OJ Simpson, he's a nobody and did these crimes. He may even get the DP. He will pay for his crimes just like Ted Bundy and other serial killers.
@@theconfusingchannel3170 he will not
I hope the trail is open to the public. Everyone is bashing them. However, all she has to do is place reasonable doubt. I pray for the families. I couldn't fathom their loss.
I don’t understand why they don’t just have the trial already? This seems so crazy they’re going back and forth with all these hearings. Get on with it already!
They know he's not guilty. They know he's gonna win the case. They want to drag it out so long to ensure the case goes cold so they dont have to deal with the reprecussions of who did it and how they botched the whole case
We have seen it before!!
The defence lawyer is giving MTG
I am waiting to hear more about the roommates.
full disclosure or its a cover up.
That's a shaky, if not false, equivalency... and too easy for people to presume thusly just because judges don't rule the way they like.
A modicum of familiarity with American jurisprudence might take some of the paranoia out of the equation for some folks.
Something isn’t right here
Right...........smh
This Judge should recuse. He is not up to this task. He’s weak.
How is he weak ?
Well that would mean no trial before 2027.
@@pirateradio00 he has the appearance of being wishy-washy, unsure of his own convictions, and shows deference to both attorneys for guidance in his own courtroom. Not showing strength is weakness.
No he's not, hes doing it on purpose. He just knows he cant be too blatantly bias against the defense
What are your qualifications for judging a judge?
Schedule the trial. The defense appears ready.
The defence are the ones stalling everything.
He did NOT waive his right to a speedy trial, if I remember correctly.
@@nancywehrung3943he totally did or we would not be here.
fr. the court Not only helping the state to hide evidence from the defense, he is also helping hide from the public
The prosecution has withheld the "audio" from the short tid-bits of video they have shared with the defense and the rest of the video has not been provided?... are you kidding me?! No wonder prosecution wants the next hearing in private! I want to know what other vehicles were in that neighborhood during the ENTIRE evening and morning! Clearly prosecution are the ones stalling.
This judge is so lackluster. The case demands a very strong prosecution. I don't think he is fit for it.
He is NOT part of the prosecution OR the defense. He is the unbiased overseer of the court to make sure written law is followed. Santa is the prosecution, and he seems to be lacking confidence or evidence. Also, in a death penalty case, it's about FAIRNESS.
The judge in a jury case should not be part of the prosecution at all. That's not his or her role.
This case has never seemed open and shut to me.
She's not wrong.
What if he's innocent? I doibt it but who knows. I've heard some interesting theories
Bullish*t Alibi. I am so tired of this entitled Defense and Defendant. Wait.. “a little vacuum”, “the public needs to know?” WTF
Me too.
Me too.
Right there with you.
So let me get this straight. Jack S. alibi was he was driving ALONE to his parents cabin in the early morning hours, and hasn’t been seen since. Yet BK driving ALONE in the early morning hours is a bullsh*t alibi. Oh ok if you say so.
So basically anyone who lives alone, goes driving alone will be screwed if someone wants to accuse them of a crime because they will not have an alibi. For your sake, I hope you always are around other people 24/7. No cast report, no case.
It's Bryan that's running the whole thing.
k but what about the DNA
Planted or faked at the lab. Remember how the Sergant never mentioned seeing the knife sheath, yet Payne said he did.... later? HA!
@@W1ZYPayne mentioned it because Payne wrote the PCA and it was relevant. It was never said that he was the first one to notice it. (Though it wouldn’t be strange if he WAS the first one, considering it sounds like it was partially under Maddie.) No accredited lab is going to fake DNA evidence. That is outlandish
@@W1ZYso they picked a random guy who has an Elantra to pin it on? and coincidentally he happened to have been out and about that night? And coincidentally he also happened to have shut off his phone right at the time of the crime?
@blackfalkon4189 _"k but what about the DNA"_
They only found "Touch DNA" (Trace DNA) on the sheath.
Touch-DNA is transferred by Touch (which isn't as direct as it sounds).
You touch the door to the bank, someone else touches the door and your T-DNA goes with them and is transferred to all the things and people they touch, and so on. Including car / Uber door handles.
Our Touch-DNA (your T-DNA) is in so many places we have never been and on so many things we've never touched. Think about this - your T-DNA is probably in all your work colleagues homes, even if you've never been in any of their homes.
Touch DNA (T-DNA) doesn't put someone at the scene. It could be transferred by someone using the same door handle at a completely different location.
This is why T-DNA isn't very dependable, especially on its own.
-
Nuclear DNA (N-DNA) is the more substantial type (blood, semen, saliva, body tissue, and hairs that have tissue at their root ends). N-DNA is the type that usually puts someone "at the scene". It is the sort of DNA that is usually used to convict people and the sort of DNA we would usually hear being used in cases.
They found no N-DNA of his anywhere in the house, or of the victims in his home /car.
You mean the touch DNA?
Get. On. With. The. Trial.
RIP,Ethan , Xana, Kaylie, Maddie...❤❤❤❤❤
The state doesn’t want to be prejudiced if all the issues with the case get exposed and the judge helps them maintain control of the narrative by closing the hearing,
You didn't watch the video. This is just a hearing. Also, the judge said it would start closed but would open it up if that was appropriate. There is so much misinformation being spread...
I guess further out on that trial date is expected with Ann wanting to blame the state?
The state seems to be the weaker of the two sides, here.
This looks like Traffic Court!!!!!
I think our eyes have been opened if one draws conclusions from the past 4 years of the government and the FBI.
Ask yourselves this... Why are they withholding video if they have him lock stock and barrel? Because they don't.
Sounds like Bryans getting framed.
the followers cannot think on their own...
They didn't withhold the video, they gave it to them. She's complaining that there is no audio in that video, which is useless for identifying a vehicle. If you actually listen to what they're saying it's a lot easier to understand what's happening.
@ggary04 If you had actually listened and processed you would know that the deadline to turn over all evidence and discovery is September. Part of the prosecution's strategy is not to turn over what they have too early. You must not have any lawyers in your family.
@@lisas8244 You do realise that they have handed over everything they have, but law enforcement hasn't turned everything over to them.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 You obviously didn't understand my comment.
The Defense gaslights a lot! She wants to play with public opinion! This judge needs to get some balls and take control of this case!
So what does she gasslight?
yup "gaslight gatekeep girlboss" is the lawyer agenda💅
I've had enough with this buzzword gas lighting. If you're not a licensed psychiatrist just close it would you please.
@@hydrostatic8048you don’t need to be a licensed psychologist to use the word gaslight or a bunch of other terms. Haha. That’s hysterical you think that.
I would agree that she’s trying to drive the narrative that the prosecution lacks integrity before the trial has even started
Iam tired of waiting for trial
Surely victims also have rights, or do only defendants have rights?
AT is all bark & no bite
100%