Omega Seamaster 300M vs. Tudor Pelagos

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
  • Omega Seamaster 300M
    210.30.42.20.03.001
    42mm case
    13.6mm thick
    49.6mm lug to lug
    20mm lug width
    300m water resistance
    Cal. 8800 w/ 55 hours power reserve
    194.7 grams
    $5,600
    Tudor Pelagos
    M25600TB-0001
    42mm case
    14.3mm thick
    50.1mm lug to lug
    22mm lug width
    500m water resistance
    Cal. MT5612 w/ 70 hours power reserve
    148.8 grams
    $4,925
    brentmiller.com/
    brad@brentlmiller.com
    717-569-5450

Комментарии • 35

  • @CaptCanuck4444
    @CaptCanuck4444 Год назад +11

    Omega for me. I'd prefer both watches on straps though.

  • @JuanSegarra-td6yr
    @JuanSegarra-td6yr Месяц назад +1

    I bought the Tudor and can’t beat the strap. It’s a great bracelet

  • @chrisfaircloth9078
    @chrisfaircloth9078 Год назад +9

    110% Tudor Pelagos, no contest!

  • @craigwoolbert2443
    @craigwoolbert2443 Год назад +4

    Love the Pelly. I have the black one. The matte finish is soooooooo great. Never been a fan of the skeleton hands on the Seamaster.

  • @edgeyt1
    @edgeyt1 Год назад +3

    Pelagos gets my vote but I prefer it in black.

  • @BrettinLux
    @BrettinLux Год назад +4

    I have the Pelagos with black dial and the Tudor FXD so you can guess my choice🙈😀I do prefer the shiny bezel insert on the Omega.

  • @jfra4
    @jfra4 3 месяца назад +2

    Someone mentioned in another video that the Pelagos bezel looks like a gambling chip and that’s all I see now 😂

  • @markmccarthy7887
    @markmccarthy7887 7 месяцев назад +1

    Owned a lot of luxury dive watches ,,, have to say when it comes to movement finish and pure aesthetics’s nothing beats the omega SMP 300..it’s the perfect dive watch

  • @triplejriggs
    @triplejriggs Год назад +3

    Tudor for me. While the Omega is obviously a fantastic watch, its styling is becoming dated a bit, where the Tudor is a modern tool watch. Both check different boxes for me.

  • @hjkhhjkh3635
    @hjkhhjkh3635 21 день назад +1

    I can get either for the exact same price (the omega on the rubber though, I don’t like the bracelet), it’s so hard to choose…I wish the pelagos was a bit thinner. It would help the decision for sure

  • @philtoy9241
    @philtoy9241 Год назад +4

    The non-tapered bracelet and escape valve are terrible on the Omega

  • @dandahl5964
    @dandahl5964 Год назад +2

    Omega for me due to overall wearability and suits more occasions.

  • @Vox-Populi
    @Vox-Populi Год назад +3

    I had a SM 300, but sold it because I couldn't read it at night. There is virtually no lume on the hands. A Pelagos is in my future!

    • @gregsmith7145
      @gregsmith7145 Год назад +2

      Omega all day long not even close

    • @robertlock6041
      @robertlock6041 Год назад

      I'm with you there, Vox...

    • @Rodolfoguerra12
      @Rodolfoguerra12 Год назад +2

      I used to have both of them, but ended up selling the Pelagos because of the thickness, it was ok for me at first, but at the end of the day it ended up not working for me. In addition to that point, in terms of fit and finish Omega SMP300 is far better than the Pelagos, perhaps because of the titanium, I also have a BB58 and even that I think it’s way better finished than the Pelly. Perhaps a hybrid that could work for you if you don’t mind the thickness is the Planet Ocean, great lume and better finished + better movement than the Pelagos. Hope this helps. Cheers.

    • @brentmillertime8778
      @brentmillertime8778  Год назад +3

      Planet Ocean vs. Pelagos comparison coming soon.

    • @robertlock6041
      @robertlock6041 Год назад +2

      @@brentmillertime8778 You read our minds, Brad!...

  • @robertlock6041
    @robertlock6041 Год назад +3

    Hi Brad, 2 excellent watches but I feel that the Tudor is more fit for purpose. The Omega, gorgeous as it is, is just not as accomplished. They're both too big for me though... Cheers, Bob 🍻

  • @EQ9962
    @EQ9962 Год назад +1

    Love the Omega but do not like the bracelet. Shines on a strap. Tudor really is a strong brand. I love the vintage vibes i get from them. I will have to add one to my collection. Thank you for the video

  • @paulbrennan552
    @paulbrennan552 Год назад +4

    Just by looking at them side by side...Pelagos far more legible...doubly so, underwater...if you want shiny shiny get the seamaster...

  • @yonder_owls
    @yonder_owls Год назад +1

    The Omega case shape better obscures the thickness. It can also pass for dressy, whereas the Tudor is 100% tool watch. My personal choice is a design I feel sits in the middle of these two: all-blue Planet Ocean. I own a very wearable 39.5mm version. I was able to try on mine side-by-side with a 39mm Tudor. For me, it was an easy choice.

  • @Zeeawon
    @Zeeawon Год назад +2

    Tudor❤

  • @whywecollectwatches
    @whywecollectwatches Год назад +4

    The Omega Seamaster wins hands down! The blue wave dial is awesome!

  • @blackbob1977
    @blackbob1977 Год назад +1

    Hard to choose 😅

  • @SineFractal
    @SineFractal 6 месяцев назад +1

    I’ve had both. Tudor is too thick and doesn’t sit well on the wrist. The SMP sits better

  • @gabyeah101
    @gabyeah101 Год назад +2

    Seamaster craftmanship and finish is above Pelagos, the Pelagos has a lot of sharp edges still a great tool watch. Seamaster a better overall watch if you are considering to only buy one watch.

  • @explorerjlc1743
    @explorerjlc1743 Год назад +1

    Good comparison. This is better than sub vs smp. Rolex is one tier above omega. Tudor is more in line with Omega. Good job.

    • @elgordo9016
      @elgordo9016 Год назад +3

      Omega is above Tudor, im every way...

  • @jwillwork3683
    @jwillwork3683 Год назад +2

    Pelagos easy 🤷🏿‍♂️

  • @hanssaykiewicz4319
    @hanssaykiewicz4319 Год назад

    Why are you comparing an Omega with a Tudor?