Airbus A220-300 vs 737 Max 7: Which is better?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 апр 2020
- This video is about the Airbus A220-300 vs 737 Max 7, 737-7. Two single aisles from Boeing and Airbus, though unlike Boeing 737 Max, the Airbus A220 was developed by Bombardier. However, following some lawsuits, Airbus took over and the Airbus A220 was born. Still, in this video, we compare A220 vs 737 Max, specifically the Airbus A220-300 vs 737 Max 7 and find out which is the better single aisle from Airbus vs Boeing!
Link to GlobalGiving www.globalgiving.org
Link to the Instagram page / airplane_productions
I have flown on an Airbus A220 and a Boeing Max 8. Give me the A220 any day of the year. Wider seats, bigger windows, and a washroom that actually fits people. Oh and it actually flies.
Steve Wismark Haha! Yep the A220 is just a better aircraft with lower costs. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
If only Boeing had NOT let pride and greed blind their judgment by now we could have been looking at an entirely different situation with 2021-2022 being the launch year for an entirely new re-designed 737 ( B-797 ) with entry into service 2025-2026. This model could have also included a stretch large enough to be considered a valid replacement for the B752 & B753. You would have seen some carriers hold back on new orders, as such as new design could undoubtedly be more advanced and more efficient that than A220 or E195-E2. What transpired with the 737-MAX did not only disgrace Boeing but they dragged down the FAA with them, which had knock-on effects with other Government Agencies across the planet !! ( The latter in my opinion is a good thing as certification of new civilian aircraft will now be stricter ensuring a greater level of safety for passengers ). For Boeing now, this has not just put the 737-MAX under a magnifying glass, but it has drawn additional attention to the 787 and the new 777-X, which means if we are honest the re-design of the B737 ( The B797 ) has been forced onto the back burner for possibly re-kindling 2030. Boeing has lost a huge fortune over the 737-MAX and is lucky to have its military contracts to fall back on. Sticking purely with the civilian side, by the time the dust has settled, the 737-MAX will end up being the most scrutinized and safest aircraft to fly on to date, it might NOT be the most comfortable or fuel-efficient, etc. but it will do well especially with LCC and Vacation airlines. Whether Boeing actually makes any profit from the 737-MAX remains to be seen. We will see these ongoing quality control issues with the Dreamliner finally resolved across the board and the 777=X entering service as a new record-breaker and the pride of many a carriers fleet. Once this has been achieved Boeing will then proceed with the new design 737 ( B797 )
The Max has more cup holders.
The extra seat width really matters. I was going on vacation with my then 2 kids a few years back. And well 3 width and we where 4 person. So we just raised the arm rest and set the kids in the middle. Now all 4 fit on the same bench. Have to just jump over for landing.
If Ryan finds out about this, they will make a 2 children 2 adult bench
Yes I agree lovely plane.
A220 if flying, 737 max Is not
End of discussion
Yoav Hofstein Ha lol! Thanks for watching :) I believe the Max will be safety up soon!
I agree!
@@oneskyflyer watch Wendover productions video about the max re entry process, to see that it will take a year to train, maintain and fix the aircraft. There is also corona virus, so airlines won't want the extra capacity
You cant say that, this video is already bad because the c- series and max were built for two different reasons. Just because the max had a bad design dosent make it comparable to the c-series. The max was built for transcontinental and transatlantic flights as a mid size medium range aircraft, the c-series is an rj. I know that the og 737 was an rj but the max is not. They're uncomeparable.
Nicholas Kent Absolutely so, but Boeing still fought for marketshare with Bombardier in the Delta deal, stating the Max was the better aircraft. Still, in this market the A220 is more efficient and better suited. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
I think both of them looks very beautiful on their own way. I am going with the A-220-300/CS-300.
Lee Zinke Thanks for your comment. Yep the A220 is a great aircraft indeed, and Airbus has got a great aircraft at the best possible price. Thanks for watching
AirplaneProductions you’re welcome 😊
A220 is also better optimised for routes most airlines are going to fly these planes on.
Alexander Mack Absolutely, it is the better aircraft :) With it’s smaller size and perfect range, the aircraft will open up a new era of Point to point travel. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
@MrFalcon2001 Thanks for your question. Well the A220-300 is defintely more fuel efficient per trip. I would say around 5% more efficient though exacts are hard to conclude given different ranges and seat count. Thanks for tuning in!
A220 is more sleek & stylish, not to mention has the widest windows amongst any narrowbody 🛫😎
Stradivarious Hardhiantz Yep, it has the nicest cabin. The widest cabin of a narrow body is the MC21, though for a regional jet A220 has a wide fuselage. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
I personaly think the C-series is ugly, i prefer the look of clasics like the 737, L1011, and 747
I love the A220! The 737 air frame is old tech, it should have been updated decades ago. The A220 is a beauty second to none.
They did update it many times but it has reached it maximum limits.
@@D_2_M they didn't. They have extended it vastly, but the reason the 737 Max climbs too steep when power is added is because the wings needed to be further back, so that the newer high-bypass engines being mounted further forward on the Max didn't result in an unstable design requiring the Tail to need MCAS to constantly fight the unstable design.
If they had resigned the airframe then either the wings or landing gear would have been higher to allow the new engines to fit under the wings, OR the wings would have sat further back (by maybe 2ft) so the center of thrust was balanced with the airframe.
The fact is they didn't redesign it. They have only extended it. Proof is found in the flat bottom of the Leap 1b engines.....needed because they cba to redesign it.
One thing I would like to add regarding the 737. In 1984, I was flying from Minot, ND to Denver, CO on Frontier Airlines. The 737 was one of the first models built in 1967. The overhead was just a shelf and not storage bins. While flying over South Dakota, we hit an air pocket and the jet dropped out of the sky and when it finally "grabbed" air, I saw the wings bend upward to where I thought they would snap. I thought we were dead, but the wings held and we continued the flight to Denver. Even though that 737 was ancient, it was durable and I am sure it went through thousands of cycles. Boeing really did a great job on that series in my opinion.
@soaringtractor They ruined it by introducing the Max
Code3Forever
The older 737 was good since there is no competition. But now there are lot of capable aircraft’s such as A220. Boeing just betrayed their loyal customers by introducing 737 max in a rush competing A320 neo.
Eh wings are designed to tolerate flex, the 737 (the DC-9 family was too) was a tough aircraft but the max ruined it. I was on an A321 and we hit a bit of turbulence at our cruise altitude in south Illinois it was only a year or so old but still there was quite a bit of wing flex. But I wasn’t too worried for I know those wings are built in such a way that they can handle that flex.
@@grozaphy they didn't it they didn't do it properly
It was great for the past when airlines don't really charge you for many things to make profit and when they don't squeeze more small seats to break even or make more profits. Plus back then in 1960s when it was first introduce 737 didn't have to worry too much about efficiency. Nowadays everything have to be efficient. So 737 got upgraded overtime to follow the trend and safety but in today fast paced world 737 already reached it's limits. Boeing too cheap to make a new plane from scratch because of Bean counter management the company used to be run by engineers now focus more on profit by selling legacy products.
You must live on Mars if you have to even ask that question.
I prefer the A220 because I value my life
737max is safer than ever
@@nickolliver3021 Nice joke bro.
@@reiner5593 well since then its fixed 😀
@@nickolliver3021 wasn't that the same thing boeing said after lion air crash ?
@@reiner5593 okay calm down. We're 2 years on and she's done really well.
I will go with the plane that doesn’t drive it’s self into the ground
Jason Haley Haha. Well I believe Boeing will fix the MCAS issues and that 737 will be as safe as any aircraft eventually. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
Have you heard of Alpha-Prot? That's Airbus version of MCAS. It almost downed Qantas 72 and Lufthansa 1829, educate yourself before you comment about poorly trained pilots. Also the max 7 is different than the 8.
Key word “almost.” No mater what, the 737 MAX still drove 2 into the ground.
@@k.c.5312 any plane would drive anybody into the ground if they weren’t trained
@Zour Clown The Faulty MCAS drove the plane into the ground as well as the undertrained pilots since Boeing mentioned little to nothing about the MCAS.
The total irony of it is that the A220 wasn´t built primarily to be the most economical narrow body, but rather be quite comfortable. And well, it is both.
Granted, that boeing manage to get that much efficiency out of the old 737 is still impressive
I have worked as grounds ops for delta and jetblue, so I have worked on most planes, the europeans are so mush cleaner and accurate with their construction. Given the choice I would fly airbus if possible.
the only thing here is that the a220 is not an european plane, its a canadian one who got sold to airbus
what wrong with a Boeing
@@nickolliver3021 for ground ops guys the airbus have more room, are laid out better and the craftsmanship of the whole plane feels and looks better than boeing
@@marcusholmes7942 both airbus and boeing offer more room than old existing inefficient aircraft for sure. I can say the craftsmanship of 787 and 777x look better but look tbh they all have ups and downs.
@@nickolliver3021 Much quicker to list the things that are NOT wrong on today's Boeings. 737 Max, 787 or 777X.... one nightmare after another. Former and current management needs to be put behind bars.
I think the a220 is better - how could it not be? It is brand new, while the Max is a souped up version of a plane from the 60s.
THere is not one single part on the 737NG which would fit on the original 737. 737Max likewise has almost ZERO part commonality with the 737NG. Thanks for proving you are utterly ignorant. Bravo. Keep typing displaying your ignorance to the world! Bravo!
w8stral what in the lords name are you talking about?
@@hodb3906 If you are utterly ignorant of a subject and have zero cognitive ability to read 2 posts, I can't help you.
@Seawolf The commonality is in its flight characteristics so you do not have to recertify PILOTS. And yes, plenty of parts in common between NG and MAX. Just nothing in the wing, tail, empenage, leaving only the forward/rear sections of the fuselage/landing gear as "common"
@Seawolf How the Lazy B claims 70% is an absolute joke. Hell even the aluminum stringers used in the fuselage are different in the Max over the NG. Same goes for the wing.
A220 should become a great seller especially given the current state of affairs. I personally believe smaller jets will do very well in the post coronavirus world.
Yes smaller jets is the future. That's why A380 are retiring.
I would rather an Airbus than a Boeing Model-T Ford with updated MCAS with NONE of the faults taken away. The aircraft is unstable A DESIGN FAULT, cure the fault NOT hide it away. Boeing did that AND CHARGED EXTRA if you wanted to know what the fault was. GREED IS BOEING and FAA.
That A200 is a hell of an aircraft. Built with pride in Mobile Alabama USA. :)
For US customers only. Home is Mirabel, Canada
Which is flying?
A220 is perfectly suited for short haul flights and also more efficient. But MAX has got its flexibility. Both have its pros and cons. I'll choose a220 anyday over MAX 7.
Chirag Chaudhuri Thanks for your comment. The A220 is indeed more efficient, though the higher trip cost of 737 Max makes it a difficult one for airlines to justify to place on certain routes. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
I'll go anytime for the A220.
and the 737max
The new single aisle from Airbus or the good old workhorse with new engines from Boeing? Which is better? Comment below!
I believe the A-220 is better as it is a fresh design and more advanced. The 737 was a great plane for it's time but with the MAX, you are cramming new and bigger engines where there had to be design changes. Due to Boeing deliberately covering up the MCAS concerns by Boeing engineers, I have no confidence in the 737 MAX program. Boeing does make good aircraft with all of their other models but they dropped the ball with the MAX. I feel sorry for the Boeing employees who lost work on the project but I feel Boeing should have started from scratch to build a jet to compete with Airbus. Now you have to wonder what else Boeing "neglected" to tell airlines and pilots regarding other aircraft they have built while Muilenberg was in charge.
A220 of course. The 737 peaked with the NG and they should have stopped there.
Stop! Boing had putted the Airboss engines under the wings!
And the 737 have only the option for the LEAP engines.
The A220 only P&W engines with the gear transmission.
737 Max = Harley Davidson, Airbus A321 Neo = BMW
They were not an untested manufacturer? Hello! You know about the business jets and regional jets and turboprops they made. They made quite a few CRJs so manufacturing capabilities were demonstrated.
Slight correction
1. If the Max was to ever fly again it will be treated as a New Aircraft with all the required training and NO Crossover training allowed
2. The 737 Max will NEVER be certified until it is redesigned from scratch
3. The decision was made to never let it fly by Boeing PR Stunt announcing Certification Flights by Wednesday that had NOT been agreed
4. FAA reputation is now in tatters due to Boeing PR Stunt
5. Europe is the decision maker and Boeing has no friends there after it tried to destroy Bombardier
6. Brazil will not allow Boeing to have certification after the way it throw out its deal with Embraer
SUICIDE is still the mantra of Boeing
Ouchhhh
@@D_2_M Europeans will NOT trust any FAA certification of the 737Max. If it went ahead then there is a view in Europe to never fly Boeing aircraft. There is now an excess of aircraft that outside of the USA airlines can just cancel the Max and use their spare aircraft until Airbus delivers. Boeings best solution is simply CANCEL the 737 Max and design a new aircraft, exactly what it should have done from the start. GREED, BONUS and EXCESSIVE EXECUTIVE PAY
@@trevorhart545 Europeans will trust any FAA certification of the 737max. if it went ahead then there is a view in Europe to always fly Boeing aircraft. then what is wrong with other Boeing aircraft? There is now an excess amount of aircraft waiting outside around the USA waiting to be delivered and airlines cannot just cancel the MAX and use their spare aircraft until airbus delivered. Boeing's best solution is to never simply CANCEL the 737max and do not design a new aircraft. exactly what it should not have done from the start. GREED, BONUS and EXESSIVE EXECUTIVE PAY will make it much safer than ever
slight more correction
1. If the 737max was ever to fly again it will be treated as a new Aircraft with all the required training and No crossover training allowed.
2. the 737max WIll DEFINITELY be certified until there are a FIX and Whole OVERHAUL of the aircraft
3. The decision was made to always let it fly by Boeing PR stunt announcing Certification flights by Wednesday that had been Agreed.
4, FAA reputation is now not in tatters due to Boeing PR stunt
5. Europe is the decision-maker and Boeing has lots of friends thereafter it destroyed McDonald Douglas, not Bombardier. (airbus took over Bombardier)
6. Brazil will allow Boeing to have certification after the way it throws out is a dealer with Embraer
SUICIDE is NOT the mantra of Boeing anymore
Bombardier need to stretch the cs300 , now that would give Boeing a fright. One suspecks air bus might drag the chain cos it would finish off theA320 range as well,except the A321, or bigger
not been in either but the A220 for me ,, as its not gotten a rep for falling out of the sky ...
World airlines like Korean Air loves A220-300. So fuel efficient and economical that it turns profitable at 50% seat occupancy. Flexible seat and flight scheduling is added bonus for both major airline and budget airline. Passenger loves wide seating space and window, seat entertainment. Residents near airport loves it for its low aircraft engine noise level.
After flying recently on both, the A220 hands down.
I'm watching this video too learn more about Aircraft Comparissons!!!!!
You would be better off reading aircraft flight manuals...
Karlos Sargeant Thanks for your support :)
@@oneskyflyer YW Man My Favourite New Single Aisle Plane Right After The Boeing 737 Max is The Airbus A220's I hope too fly with them soon!!!!!
There is no comparison, as they are two different type of aircraft designed for different flight operations and route structures. The comparison should have been the A319neo and the B737 MAX 7 not with the A220-300.
Well, Boeing brought up this case of which accusing A220 "dumping" casue airlines not choose their 737 MAX 7. Of course they not only lose the case and karma eventually catch up with them!
a220 better, first because the door plugs aren’t loose, 2nd is because they don’t maulfunction and nosedive straight to the ground and 3rd is because it’s safer than the MAX8 and MAX9
A220 is basically a working and safer version of the 737 max.
Airbus > Boeing, just look at which one is flying, and which isn't. Which one has crashed, TWICE, and which one hasn't
haha one flies still and the other one has started flying again. which one has crashed more than twice and which one will stay at two crashes
what's with the music?
The two planes are very Cutes, wonderful. Great video, Thanks very much. But I prefer the Boeing 737 MAX 7. But very beautuful both planes.
Best of luck to you!
@@rhoad21 Because the 737 acidents, that a shame to you Mr. Airbus. You also have to investigate about those aircraft.
This one is a no brainer. One airplane crash or is on the side track regularly, vintage airplane rejuvenated but with bug to fix every so many months, the other is the benchmark of his category , loved by customers and fleet owners. A220 all the way.
I can’t wait until someone makes a private jet configuration of it ACJ220.
They already did saw article few days ago.
@@D_2_M neat
anything but plane that use software for solve design problem and that software only depends on one freakin sensor...
That AOA sensor is everything for an aircraft. I mean for all the aircraft out there.
A 220 is better than B 737 max
See Boeing this is why u can't take short cuts with things
767 vs a300/a310
Corey Coutain Interesting, well I do think that 767 is closer to the A330 in terms of performance. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
I was expecting simple side-by-side comparison and numbers and not all the cuts of planes flying like wtf?
just sound like a airbus commercial..
I prefer the 737. The harmony in designer is more beautifull than Airbus. I guess that A 330 has harmony in designer better of than all.
For better or worse modern aviation is a numbers game. The A220 is optimised for its size. The Max 7 is not. Even given the crew type conversion costs, to those airlines whose need is predominantly in the 120-150 seat range there is an obvious advantage in the Airbus. Neither is the fact that it pleases their passengers lost to potential operators. Oh yes, this plane WILL sell.
A220 300 lets go.
A220 all the way. Its a nice and safer plane and.. they build it in my home city lol
MCAS can make a 747 fly exactly like a 172. Really cuts down on pilot training.
Too bad Boeing didn't configure that system for the MAX to work as needed.
@@danielkbarton Indeed. Boeing is a disgrace
Honestly the more fair comparison would be the 737-600 vs the A220, the 737-700 competes more with the A319 and same with max vs neo, the A220 is more a smarter replacement to the A318
Joseph Penn Interesting, yep the 737-600 competes with the A220-100 though the larger -300 actually is similar in size to 737-700. Thanks for watching!
The one without MCAS is better!
The AB is just the CRJ by Bombardier
Jason Haley yeah. We know. But it’s called the a220 now. Sorry but you have to live with it.
CSeries /aka A220/ hands down any day !! Designed, developed and built in Canada, calling this aircraft a regional jet does it a disservice!
Great Canadian built aircraft, designed and built by Bombardier, AirBus bought the program.
The 737 is having nightmares. And I only hope she woke up. The 220 is a treasure taker
Not a fair comparison really. One plane is modern and awesome. They other is ancient and a wanna be.
This guy presents a nice video but I think he should pick better background music because I find it hard to understand him
Richard Pluim Thanks for your feedback. Will do so!
your welcome,keep up the good work.
I prefer a220
A220 has a good safety record than boeing 737 max
Is this even a question in 2021 and after..?? The A220-300 wins by a mile.
737 for life
One flies, the other doesn't.
one flies and the other one has been released
I like A220 better
You can't just compare between a model designed by clowns supervised by monkeys, which is grounded as we speak and a magnificent masterpiece super safe A320 Neo
it's all about safety For God sakes!! I certainly wouldn't care about what qualities 737-max has when I'm dead.
Max 7 for me...
that graph is not accurate because it had a 737-7 not a 737-7 Max
Nicholas Kent Thanks for your comment. All data in the video is of 737-7 Max. Thanks for clarifying and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way!
A220-300
A319neo quit from the chat room
hummm...difficult call...i' say the max! Because MACS is great stuff! Lol
MCAS means well but it wasn't done properly neither was the 737 Max on the whole, Boeing will have to do it properly this time
Both are not flying atm
End of discussion
Jkjk lol
this video is pointless the a220 was made to replace the embrarear 175 and 190 these two planes aren't competing against each other they are in two different classes
Airbus forever 😍🛫
No one them
A220 is flying, Max is not! What was the question?
max is now flying
@@nickolliver3021 First WestJet flight on Monday already had a problem, flight was cancelled, I will never fly on that aircraft
@@JohnAnderson-sq8lt first westjet flight on Monday. And what was that problem then as you never explained what it was! And tve flight was not cancelled because you just made that up. It would be on tbe news. Why should you not fly that aircraft ?
@@nickolliver3021 I wouldn't waste my time making it up, it was on the news, Lots of planes to fly on, why would anyone travel on that aircraft
@@JohnAnderson-sq8lt the EASA just declared it safe today! I dont see anywhere about it on tbe news. The 737max is a common aircraft replacing older 737ng. People would travel on it because they know it is safer due to its grounding and efforts!
A220 must win
A220 all the way and all the best 👍👍👌👌🎉🎉
That your opinion. But the 737 was the first one to find the treasure. The a220 take it from it. And now is having nightmares.
ตามที่รูปภาพเห็นนี่แหละบิวสวนกันคิดไม่ตรงกันเรื่องปัญหาประเทศยูเครน
pilots prefer the A220-300 as it kinda stays in the sky, however, it (A220-300) has had a few issues, Swiss experienced some engine cut-outs that may have been caused by a software issue. Software problems are being eyed as the cause of several engine failures, but I understand that's been rectified, pilots can restart and continue haha
Not a match, sorry
Jimmy Runtuwene yes it is max7 can hold 150 pax and a220 160 pax, and they both have a similar range
4:20 of word salad before getting on to the subject is a bit much. Thats nearly half of the video. You can do better.
b737 isn't a220 duel.
a320 yes
1960's plane vs latest plane? No chance. Boeing is a tired company.
Hideous and loud music
The A220-371 is the best plane ever.. Airbus has a smart team Boeing does not.. Look at there X CEO who killed many for putting out the MAX 8 way to early to make money..
No competitiom. Unfortunately Boeing's reputatiom ia now in the gutter. The 737 Max is still based on a 1950's design and has merely been updated with each new series. The MAX is an upgrade too far. Boeing should have designed a new plane from the ground up, not tried to cut corners. With major airlines cancelling orders, Boeing will struggle!
Unfortunately, Boeings reputation is not in the gutter anymore. the 737max is based on a 1950's frame but the max is just an update with the last series. The max is an upgrade just right. Boeing did come up with a new design of plane called 797 from the ground up. that never made it t production. the 737max will be returned to service fully by this new nma aircraft from boeing. they haven't cut corners now. with no major airlines not cancelling orders Boeing will thrive
Get your facts correct "After American forced Boeing to re-engine" - American did NO such thing, that issue was entirely down to Boeing Salemans pride and greed. Boeing offered American a re-engined 737 that at the time was NOT even on the drawing board, claiming their product would br cheaper and better for American, in order to persuade American not to shut out Boeing but to split the initial 100 Aircraft order for A320Neo's with Boeing for 737-MAX's.
When the MAX gets ungrounded I would take the max any day because it is more rouged and stronger and it runs the same systems as the boeing 787 and it was but for longer range rather than the CS100 it was built for short flights like regional flights and you can fly a boeing 737 from Canada to Cancun and not stop also the A220 looks like it was trying to go with the look of the sukhoi superjet . And tbh the boeing 737 has a more versatile option and the systems are easy to jump from a boeing 737-800 to a boeing 737-900 because of the similar systems and the boeing 737 has more of a reputation that is why airlines have not droped on the big 73 and tbh I've flown a 737 before it has more legg room in the cockpit how ever Airbus has good seating but the A220 is not really known and it is just a plane rebadged with airbuses logo and this comparison was kinda unfair because the CS200
is a regional jet and the boeing 737 is not and a fair comparison would had been the embrare ERJ-195 and the CS200 that would be a fair comparison. I'm not a really a Airbus lover I'm more of a boeing lover. Plus I don't like the fact that a computer is trying to minimize the amount of control of the aircraft I have I want to be in control of it all and airbuses fly by wire has caused a lot of Airbus crashes to be hectic let's stop acting like Airbus is all that grand it has a lot of faital flaw's .in my opinion I think boeing will still be the company people will purchase plane's from .
joshua drain Thanks for your comment. Yep, the Max is a versatile aircraft, though in this market cost matters and the A220 is more efficient. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos on the way :)
U have your head buried in the sand
If Southwest was SMART they would have replaced there aging 737-700 fleet with the A220-300. Instead of going with the "unpredictable" MAX's. There is no question the A220-330 is quieter, more fuel efficient, and spacious compared to older generation 737-700 models. I clearly see this jet becoming the NEW front runner over the next few years as the top regional aircraft without question. And if they decide to build a 500 stretched variant even more so. Then they will be directly competing with the 737 MAX's for sure. Not that the A320-NEO's haven't done so in there own right. But an A220-500 variant would only further chip away at Boeing's flawed MAX development. It's only a matter of time in my honest opinion before that jet has problems again.
Why bother to make this video? The A220 is a proven certified design that received highest passenger and pilot accolades. The 737 MAX is a certified dive bomber, and will continue to be a dive bomber. Take your pick.
Airbus over Boeing always.
Boeing over Airbus always
The Max is a flying coffin.
the max is not a flying coffin
@@nickolliver3021yes it is fym it ain’t 😂
@@sixfifty_sebb fym? It ain't?
@@nickolliver3021 huh you make no sense 😂
@@sixfifty_sebb you don't that's for sure
Appalling and mostly unintelligible commentary
A220 is better b737-8max sucks and it's stupid and ugly