happened to me with a 3080 ti, except i got a tuf for 1899 during the shortage. was supposed to get 200 plus frames on 1440p and nope. hoevered around 140-160 with any settings. hardware is a scam
So many games nowadays are so freakin' unoptimized, it's just sad. It's like all of these developers think optimization is of the least priority when it's actually one of the most important parts and dictates if a game is even playable or not. Because of this, I absolutely love the feeling of playing a game for the first time and finding that it runs silky smooth. It makes me appreciate said optimized games so much more.
I think it actually is the least priority. They don't have time to release a well optimized game, so they cannot focus on this part. Devs are not to blame for this but the publisher is
Warzone always have been a mess. It's crazy to see that the most expensive GPU pulls out only if you don't put DLSS or FSR. Unleds x3D cache cpu comes in action too
@@snchez2106 honestly the real problem is devs push graphics much like overclocking, where the most minute difference requires 20-30% more power for only a 1-3% difference.
It's such a relief knowing that I am not the only one who gets that stuttering with the plane intro. Since I built my PC, I couldn't help but feel like I built it wrong or broke something for that to happen.
@@pookie619 What CPU are you guys using? I have the same issues with the plane and parachuting, but my friends don't. We all have 2080ti and one has 3080ti, but I am the only one with the issue. The difference is I am using a 5900x and they are all using Intel.
I had this exact problem with a rtx 3080 and fixed it by going to the games properties and checking the integrity of the files and 19 were missing and now its solid no frame drops and no frame time spikes.
it looks like Warzone 2 is having shader complation problems, as it lags whenever it loads a new map. They also need to optimize the assets, cause less then 100fps in a game originally built around last gen hardware is really disappointing
Is there a workaround for the shader compilation problem? It also happens to me every time I boot up the game for the first time in a day on MW2. It stutters like crazy when I first load into a map.
Im glad Im not the only one that struggled with this game. I am running a 2070 super and there are many times that it drops and struggles. Hope they fix it soon
i got and rtx 3060 and setting all low/normal and got 50-60 fps ... btw make no diff on fps if i hae evrything on normal/high just feel bit more short laggs
@@360Tarek Supposedly less detailed textures. But it's not really noticable unless you look side by side. Plus having it off saves space on your drive.
I agree with the color statement! My friend told me to change some settings in interface that makes the colors more vibrant. Filter 2 with tritonopia enabled
@@HzMuhamadelsupahul-jamallullah do you guys have maybe ping problems too? I have FTTH and low ms on speedtest but in warzone its often above 100 which is unplayable and idk if its servers fault or mine
Running a 3060 and a Ryzen 7 3800x and having pretty much the same experience, it sorts itself out eventually after a game or two but still have it in the back of my mind that frame drops are going to be the cause of death. Jumping over to BF2042 and realising just how much work they have done on optimisation gives me that the devs will take notes
When loading in, I see the little tips that you can hide and then my game freezes and then I have to end it in task manager. Or I can make all my graphics at the lowest (even making render resolution 30) and then it loads me! But its like a powerpoint presentation, I legit get to see 1 frame every like 10 seconds. The gulag is a solid 20 fps though!
The weirdest part is that I don't remember having this many issues like this on PC from the 2019 MW through Vanguard the same way that I have been on MW2... it's wild to me how unoptimized it is on PC this year...
I've had best results with the hotfix driver 526.61. No stuttering (except when jumping off the plane, that happens to everyone in my friend group) and not a single crash. 526.86 was stuttering and still crashing so I haven't even dared to try the latest one. Also WZ2 is not in beta, DMZ is.
Fixed my stuttering by verifying the files to my suprise had 22 missing. Also turning off on demand texture streaming, game literally looks somehow the same without it.
@@jihnjohncayna hopefully someone from Activision sees this video. I'm not that big though. I'll be making a video trying to fix the stuttering as well!
This is very disappointing. Activision really needs to fix the FPS problem. I'm running an RTX 3060+ i5-11400 and cant get over 80 FPS on minimum graphics.
The on-demand streaming textures is causing your lag. It's not really worth having that on since you're constantly downloading textures while you play. It's basically like downloading a game in the background the whole time while you play. I'm using the same gpu.
For reference, on a Ryzen 5 5600X, RTX 3070ti, I have ALL my settings on the lowest possible settings, and I still stutter, it is so unplayable it actually baffles me how this got released this early lol
@@StrafeY might be a cpu process issue? I'm running a 3070ti with a ryzen 9 5900x and I get like 100-120fps with no stutter and max settings. I do get the weird stutter in the plane though.
@dj Kplus I understand but I paid 4kUSD plus for my system some paid more for bleeding new tech I’m not lowering nothing below high or normal and I play at 1440p not 4k
I was getting microstutters until I turned off nvidia low latency and left it at default. You can max everything except particles, volumetrics, and shades and will get a big perf boost. I get 120 fps or so with a 3080ti at 3840x1600 which is almost 4k.
From my experience it's the opposite. I'm reaching more than 70 fps on High/Medium settings on my RX580, while WZ1 barely reached 60 on a good day on the lowest settings. Also no stutters, unlike the mess that was WZ1. These are a few things that helped me remove stuttering in WZ1, might help here too: - Disabling On Demand texture streaming. - You really need more than 8GB of RAM, otherwise try using ISLC. It also helps if you have 16 gigs and still experience them. - Make sure your Windows page file is on your SSD, otherwise the game is pretty much unplayable.
"Make sure your Windows page file is on your SSD, otherwise the game is pretty much unplayable" - sounds interesting "You really need more than 8GB of RAM, otherwise try using ISLC. It also helps if you have 16 gigs and still experience them." - i used ISLC in WZ1, but i never felt the big difference on 16gb. using older gpu driver could also help
Regarding the graphics, idk about more colors but I definitely think some more gloss is needed in the textures or shading. Everything seems kind of matte and pastel or cartoony.
Playing with a 5900x and 3080 at 1440p competitive settings. I lock it to 120fps and it feels smooth, sometimes there is stuttering. I do not get that low fps glitch when in the plane cut scene and while dropping.
i have strange feeling its intel problem, and intel bottlenecks gpus in new warzone. every friend of mine with intel also has fps gliches, dips, stutters. once again intel sucks ass in modern gaming and people act like its not their fault. i have 5600x 1060 6gb and medium graphic preset, amd fsr ultra quality and i get smooth 80-100 fps
@@gosti500 I know im follwing over years but it would be helpful for me to order the gpu and monitor soon Im not playing warzone 24/7 so im searching for an 4K monitor but Warzone would be better on a wqhd monitor Worstcase to decide😂
There is a setting that changes how much VRAM is dedicated to MW2, if you have it max out try to lower it to 70. This helped me to fix most of the stutter
Not defending Infinty Ward but I can see why optimization at launch is a problem. I know some game devs, and did some small stuff myself. Optimization for frame drops usually comes down to: 1.Saving to disk too often 2. Lazy Loading, loading something when you need it 3. Load everything at startup (opposite of lazy loading), so you don't have to load anything after the game is ready to go 4. Downsize textures, or optimize textures to be a power of 2, packing textures into sprite sheets 5. Lower the time complexity of an algorithm 6. Don't do unnecessary tasks in update loops 7. Bad collision detection, or just too many objects that have colliders 8.Too many objects on screen9 9.. Too much masking 10. Cache results so you don't have to recompute. And there's a shit ton of more things that's too much to explain. The engine that is being used ( IW 9.0 ) is new itself and takes time to break in and optimize itself overtime, just like any other game and their respective game engine.
Ive got a 12900ks and 3090ti at 3440x1440p I get huge stutters every 60 seconds its driving me insane. happens in mw2 mp also. i went back to w10 its slightly better but the stutter is still there
Forget HDR, people always talk about HDR, but it has nothing left in a multiplayer game because it increases input lag, HDR improves the contrast ratio by a lot WHICH IS A BAD thing for a game like this because actually u wanna have the DARK spots in game bright, and the BRIGHT spors darker, to see enemys better And when u don’t care about HDR, IPS is a way better value then OLED or Mini LED Mini LED actually is useless too because enabling local dimming also increases input lag.
Graphics is amazing in this game, but only in campaign and multiplayer. Warzone graphics looks disgusting. The map is flat and grey. And trees, omg, how could they made trees look like it's from 2010. If they cannot do trees, why don't them make just big City map. No trees, just buildings. Verdansk looked awesome, warm and comfy. There is nothing comfy with new warzone map. It is shit, i will never love this map and nostalgy about it. Ok, it is not so bad, because it could be jungle map, that is worst thing ever.
I played for quite a while yesterday with my 2060. Performance was lower than expected especially when in that intro plane scene. But there is alot of bugs in the game itself, from my weapon not loading to server disconnections.
Yea 20 series user myself (2080Ti) and I’m having MAD issues with this game especially multiplayer. Fps drops like I’ve never seen before and stuttering at random times especially when I’m ADS. But i had it nice and smooth at 1440p and was capped at 158FPS and was handling it well, then my settings got reset and they have SO much extra crap we don’t need, i forgot what settings i was using lol this game is a joke and a half
The thing is that Call of Duty seems to run better on AMD hardware (it makes sense since it's developed for console primarly and PS5/XBX got AMD chipset) Looking at mw2019 (Warzone 1.0) go check the performance: i9 12900k w/ 3090 Ti, and then check same Warzone perfomance but with 5800X3D w/ RX 6950 XT, you'll see that the AMD configuration destroyes (obv without DLSS) the Intel/nVidia config But it's just a thing of these two games: MW1 and MW2 :/ Personally I used to have 160-170 fps in Warzone 1.0 in 2560x1440 DLSS perfomance and low settings, it was good in the end, playable and I could benefit a bit from my 2K 270Hz monitor But now in MW2 is different, cannot run more than 110-120fps on minimum settings with all DLSS configs/Turning off/Lowering AA.... Nothing works Turning my settings from ultra to minimum gives me just a 10-12 fps boost So in the end I leaved everything on max for maximum visual, turned the DLSS on Perfomance and turned on motion blur on both world and weapon to hide the f****ng stutter that 110fps gives and it seems that this does the trick for me You should give it a try, and it doesn't ruin my aim (just in this rare case, I usually always keep it off)
I thought I was going crazy when I saw that my fps barely changed going from low to high settings. Good to know that other people are having this issue. I can't believe the game launched like this and I'm concerned if it will improve at all in the future.
@@parasgupta8411 1060 should not suffer that much. A 1050ti could run the big maps on mw2 in 57 fps on average with some settings tweaking. I think we have seen different charts
I think these stutters and fps drops are nvidia driver issue because while playing warzone 2 yesterday i was getting around 130-150 fps or above on my rx 6500xt on fsr quality while my friend on rtx 2060 was getting barley around 100 fps on dlss performance on low graphics at 1080p , also when he stream the game on discord at 720p30 his fps dropped to 30-40 while mine barley dropped.
true on my rx 6700 xt i had perfect frametime and around 117-130 fps on 1080p without upscaling but i have to say the game couldn't utilise my gpu well it was only running like on 70% instead of 100% and my cpu was like 50-60%
I have a 2060 aswell, I get 90-100 fps on 1080p high settings with dlss quality, so I have no idea why your friend experiences these performance issues, maybe the other specs are the problem. For a comparison, here is mine: Ryzen 7 5800x, 32gb ddr4 3600mhz RAM, Asus RTX 2060 6gb version
5800x3D is the king here...I seen a video with a 3080 / 5900x and performance was almost exactly the same at 1080p and 1440p max settings..1440p with DLSS quality pretty much made no difference ethier (1080p internal) 5900x (same for 5800x, 5600x) really struggling to push a 3080..and the 5800x3D pushes much more powerful 4080 easily
Game manages to run at any preset from Minimum to Balanced at 1440p without any Upscaling methods turned on on my 3060 Ti. Once you try to go to either Ultra or Extreme even with NVIDIA DLSS turned on at 1440p, the game hard crashes back to desktop & resets my display driver & my RAM. Also any preset you try will always have frame hitching/micro-stuttering problems. I have a Ryzen 7 5700G & my RAM is 16GB DDR4 @ 3200 MHz. This game is only halfway complete & shouldn't be touched until Infinity Ward patches this broken mess.
The Game Graphics have improved drastically, saying it feels like first wazone is just sad. Models have much more detail and quality, game render is even more beautiful then other Cods and last Battlefield, shadows are really detailed, lightning design is really good and the level design is also really good. The Attention to detail and quality of the game is really Insane even more for a free to play and beta stage game. But i recognize the need for optimization. Now i must say im not a cod player i came from Battlefield as a frustrated player by 2042 and other survival games, and im just in love with the DMZ of Warzone 2, there is definitely room for improvement but it just feels good, the gameplay is really good, the movement is really smooth and i feel like the gun play is really fun. About Bugs and Crashes: I Have crashed maybe 2 Times before the release of the new Nvidia Driver, but after it, i could run smoothly in 60 Fps+ that is awesome for my low-mid end PC.
Was having problems with my internet so I couldnt watch the video properly, but going by what I saw, given the fact it seemed to improve as you traversed the terrain dynamic shader compilation could've been what was causing the stutters. Did you try going back over the areas you'd been in with setting higher again? Could have just appeared better because the shaders were already compiled by the time you tried lower settings.
I have the same issue on 4090. It doesn't work that way. It renders things on certain distance. Like if you will go go forward for 1m and backward for 1m textures will pop
Try rolling back your driver to 522.25 and see how it plays. The last two Nvidia driver updates were terrible for MW2 including the most recent one that you're running.
if he was playing in 1080p i could help you out with that one. i dont play in 4k at all as i prefer higher refresh rate w out dlss. its honestly why i came to watch the vid thought he might be in 1080p. my game doesnt stutter or anything at all though. my mp warzone2 and dmz play perfectly fine. i tuned my system though as well
@@parkersgarage4216 you shouldn't have to play at 1080p if you're buying a $1200 brand new graphics card that's dumb AF also it's not the frame rate that's bad it's the studdering and inconsistent frame pacing so no matter how high the frame rate is that doesn't really help
i agree and i could play at 1440 or 4k if i want. The thing is though your gpu bound at 1080p on low settings which is fucking sad. your right about the frame pacing in this pos game though. the higher fps does you 0 good at all. its literally like they handicap you if you do get higher fps. i can not get a steady 240 after the patch. its almost as if cod gimped frame rates or even pc's not sure which. i was getting 290+ before the patch. now i cant even get 240 steady. as far as im concerned all these gpu's are just a scam minor incremental upgrade anyways. i built my first pc which is the one im on. i now know dont waste your money as its literally a waste. my system doesnt stutter though thankfully. i couldnt play it if i was getting this experience. the damn 4080 is a scam anyways as the card isnt worth it. i wont buy an nvidia card anymore after seeing how they treat consumers no thanks.
@@parkersgarage4216 I mean I agree with the new Nvidia cards sucking but this game is just poorly optimized even with high framerate it studders like shit
Love your videos man ❤ and I have a 1650 4gb and i7 10700k and 16gb of ram dual channel and I’m on low settings well cod low lol and I didn’t get those bad stutters and low fps in beginning and I get 60 plus but yea not as smooth as multiplayer im gonna wait till warzone gets more polished before I play it more tho PS. I’m getting a 3060 to replace my 1650 should be quite the upgrade can’t wait i’ve been binge watching your 30 series benchmarks lol
This is really relieving to see, I have a 1060 and wanted this game to play the campaign, I aint too bothered about multiplayer on cods the campaigns are quite fun, however I played warzone 2.0 last week and in the lobby it was terrible, i have 32gb ram and a gtx 1060 and it was horrible in the waiting area, when i got in game it horrible, I just don't want this to happen in main campaign, but im abit more confident now i've seen this, assuming performance issues is down to optimization is a relief.
lmfao ur reaction was exactly the same as mine went in with my overkill build gettin crazy stutters but its gettin better by the day, servers r so packed
I'm gonna use this GPU for 1440P on a 180HZ monitor. Was using a 1080 before. This can actually max out games and hit my max refres rate or come close. Can't do that in 4k. I prefer high refresh rates 1440p is already clear enough imo.
Got my first 4K 144hz monitor today in comparison with my 1440p 240hz G7, never played on 4K before. I can’t get 240fps with my i7 12700 but I get around 210-220 in 1440p, and in 4K I can get 145-150 fps, and while I don’t feel any difference between 150 and 210 fps, I feel a noticable difference in terms of visibilty when I play few rounds with the 4K monitor and then switch to 1440p 4K144/165hz is def the way to go, but it’s hard to run
When the first Warzone originally launched I had a Radeon VII. It ran really well with everything maxed. No ray tracing obviously. Then I got a 2080ti and Warzone still ran well with everything maxed, including ray tracing. 144hz pretty much locked in 1080p and then in 1440p after getting a new monitor. Then at some point they started implementing patches and my frames would drop a bit, then a bit more. Eventually it would wind up sitting around 110-120, everything maxed, no RT. Regular multiplayer never had this issue. MW2 had weird graphic glitches in multiplayer for me on a 3090, everything maxed, never any DLSS. They seem to have been fixed. Not hopeful for Warzone 2 once I finally jump in.
First game after shader compilation will stutter, could be reflex too, but yeah the game is still unoptimized like most PC games today because they dont care, its more about the console space!
Honestly, If I wasn't told about WZ2, I'd just think it's WZ1 with some updates. Performance is pretty bad I must say, considering it looks almost identical to the first one and yes, I agree, I would like more color into the game, it's just too dull. By the way, my battery is on 69% while watching the video 🤣
Strange as it may seem, but WZ 2.0 is not utilising all the CPU threads. I’ve watched another benchmark with a 4th gen Core i7 and the utilisation was always at 50%. Maybe there is a workaround by changing the amount of worker threads in the configuration file. That shall solve the freezes when the CPU is working on streaming the map data.
Game is optimized on physical cores (not virtual like most of the games) and single core performance is another limiting factor in this game. That's why 8th & 9th gen 6 Cores i5s can outperform most of the 4C/8T CPU models up to 10105F & 7700Ks.. New DX12 Multiplayer games don't benefit from the threads so much unfortunately. 4th i7 is also so freaking old btw, if anyone who still want to use a 4 Cores CPU with a decent mid range card in 2022 and for the next years, they better be looking for at least 12th/13th i3 or something because of the beast single threading performance..
@@thevigilante8523 We'll see if any patch would do that or not, I've no problem with my both i5-7500 + GTX 1060 and i7-11700K + RTX 3080 rigs so far, smooth experience..Btw, similar thing was also happening in Spider-Man Remastered too, HT/SMT supported with a slow single threaded CPUs run that game so terrible. So single core performance and physical core counts are becoming more important in new DX12 games (they were also actually important before) I don't see such a big problem on that actually..
For me personally, Windows 11 was the issue, for context. I have an RTX 3060, a Ryzen 5 5600x, and 16 gigs of ram. When I first installed the game and played I noticed something off, and the something was that I was running at a solid 73 fps on average. So i tried everything, looked up guides, and updated my drivers, hell I even bought new parts, so as a last ditch effort I downloaded a fresh install of windows 10, and like magic my game was running at 150 to 170 fps on average. Keep in mind that going back to windows 10 can cause some issues with your computers files, so I really don't recommend doing this unless your able to perform the installation of windows safely. So that's my story hope it helps or does something of use :)
Parabéns pelo canal pelos benchmarks e pelos reviews, conheci o canal a pouco e vi todos os vídeos da RTX 3060TI e decidi que será minha próxima GPU. Abraço do Brasil 🇧🇷🇵🇹
@@mullerstephan uma 3060TI você consegue encontrar em promoção na Kabum por uns 2500 em média, a 3060 por cerca de 2000 +/- Importando você consegue achar mais barato porém sempre há o risco de ser taxado
@@mullerstephan essas são mais difíceis de achar, 2060 tu ainda acha bastante, mas 1080 ou 2080 tem poucas no mercado, a comparação um 2060 tu consegue achar de 1500 a 2000 dependendo de marca e loja
@@samoerai6807 Translation: *Eduardo Bonini Sinhoeretti* Did you wait for the Shaders to compile completely? *ZWORMz Gaming* Yes, everytime I restarted the game.
Id love to buy that gpu but the pricing and the real prices in my country are nearly 2x of msrp And an rtx 3080 was cheap against that one Hard to say but AMD is best option now (Im in love with Raytracing but i cant pay that in future😁)
An RTX 3080 is still an amazing GPU that will play any of these games just fine, I'm not sure why people now need a 4090 etc to just play these kinds of shooters... if you are playing these at 4k you are doing it wrong.
I'm running at 110-130 fps on a 3080ti at 1440p completely maxed out settings. Not great considering the game doesn look that great and has tons of pop in and muddy textures but certainly playable.
@@nikobellic8069 graphically yeah it's pretty ugly for how badly it runs on a lot of hardware. I can think of a dozen PS4 only games that look better than this does on PC with maxed out settings.
Another year claiming "its a brand new engine guys!", another year crediting idTech on the back of the physical case... I don't know what CoD has done to make the Quake 3 engine handle large worlds, but whatever method they are using is not up to snuff. They would be better off making Warzone an actual standalone on a 3rd party engine like CryEngine that is made for such things, and keep their engine optimized for the rest of the game. Instead they try to do both and do each poorly because of compromises.
Is there any optimizations that were made outside of the game cause im stuck at 60-50% gpu usage no matter what settings I use and it's driving me nuts.
2080Ti with an i7-12700K and 32GB of RAM and I’m struggling in multiplayer at 1440p to stay at 150-160fps but it’s starting to smooth itself out but yeah this game as a whole is not optimized very good AT ALL. I realize im using a 4 year old GPU but it’s on par with a 3070 and my CPU isn’t bad with 12c and 20t and the GPU has only been in use for a year, I’m the first person to use this FTW3 2080Ti so there’s not much ware and tare on it. But yeah idk what settings to use anymore they have WAY TOO MUCH upscaling options i have a feeling having that many settings might be messing some things up…
When the original Warzone came out I was getting 170 fps with a 3900X/GTX 1080 Ti and now in Warzone 2.0 I am getting around 170 fps with a 5950X/RTX 3090... This game is horribly optimized. With the same settings in Warzone I get 250-300 fps on my 5950X/RTX 3090 and Warzone 2.0s graphics aren't anything better than what we saw in the 1st iteration.
The PC version was definitely an after thought. Good thing I chose the PS5 version instead. I may not get greater than 120fps but at least i rarely see too far below it.
1:56 For a brief moment, RTX 4080 turned into GeForce 210
fr 😂
More like Intel 8008
@@whyops more like wood potato pc
@@blackninja9400 Ancient Greek computer
@@whyops Which was made with stone and wooden stick.
The feeling when you buy a $1200 GPU but have to bear this because of the optimization
happened to me with a 3080 ti, except i got a tuf for 1899 during the shortage. was supposed to get 200 plus frames on 1440p and nope. hoevered around 140-160 with any settings. hardware is a scam
@@jamon2868 I am barely able to get over 110 on a 3080 💀
@@jamon2868 i mean 140 is still good and on older games 600 isnt a big problem for youre graphics card also whats youre cpu
@@jamon2868 those frames sound about right to me tbh. cpu?
1400 i paid for mine :) lol
So many games nowadays are so freakin' unoptimized, it's just sad. It's like all of these developers think optimization is of the least priority when it's actually one of the most important parts and dictates if a game is even playable or not. Because of this, I absolutely love the feeling of playing a game for the first time and finding that it runs silky smooth. It makes me appreciate said optimized games so much more.
Ik like I loved it when I got forza and I ran extreme settings and it wasn’t laggy and there was no fps drops
I think it actually is the least priority. They don't have time to release a well optimized game, so they cannot focus on this part. Devs are not to blame for this but the publisher is
@@xTankky this. never blame the devs, blame the publishers for pushing these harsh deadlines on the devs forcing them to leave things unfinished.
We've been in a pandemic for 3 years...
True
I miss the good old times where games were pretty optimized
yeah. I miss playing
@@lk1407 Remember Gta5?
Why optimise when you can throw a 1200$ card on it
Just turn down the graphics. You can optimize it yourself.
@@guywithalltheanswers6942 if you're buying the second most expensive GPU in the market you shouldn't have to turn down graphics from max. Just sayin
Warzone always have been a mess. It's crazy to see that the most expensive GPU pulls out only if you don't put DLSS or FSR. Unleds x3D cache cpu comes in action too
Devs have been really lazy with optimization lately, leaving all of the work for DLSS or FSR, gaming is changing and not for the better.
warzone ran at 100fps while this shit 2.0 barely keeps 60 at max settings...
Warzone 1 ran just fine, but WZ 2.0 didn't. If the old Warzone ran bad for you, you must use a very old GPU.
@@snchez2106 honestly the real problem is devs push graphics much like overclocking, where the most minute difference requires 20-30% more power for only a 1-3% difference.
@@V3ntilator my 970 ran warzone 1.0 well but 2.0 is unplayable Sadge
It's such a relief knowing that I am not the only one who gets that stuttering with the plane intro. Since I built my PC, I couldn't help but feel like I built it wrong or broke something for that to happen.
same here
Same dude I soent like 2 grand and have a 3070 and I’m like shouldn’t it be performing better than this ?
Yeah it's a stressful feeling. I might get my next one built by somebody else just for peace of mind lol
@@pookie619 What CPU are you guys using? I have the same issues with the plane and parachuting, but my friends don't. We all have 2080ti and one has 3080ti, but I am the only one with the issue. The difference is I am using a 5900x and they are all using Intel.
@@TheProdigyXP yeah i have a Ryzen 5 5600x
I had this exact problem with a rtx 3080 and fixed it by going to the games properties and checking the integrity of the files and 19 were missing and now its solid no frame drops and no frame time spikes.
Thanks for the tip. I was missing 13 files
Where can i find that?
@@Hos23 we gotta cook yo!
@@Hos23 its in steam , when you right click the game.
@@sexyassstephen ah okay,thnx ❤
it looks like Warzone 2 is having shader complation problems, as it lags whenever it loads a new map. They also need to optimize the assets, cause less then 100fps in a game originally built around last gen hardware is really disappointing
Is there a workaround for the shader compilation problem? It also happens to me every time I boot up the game for the first time in a day on MW2. It stutters like crazy when I first load into a map.
He's in 4k tho lol but this game is badly optimized
@@juannito6318 When he sets it to 1440p It still lags like crazy.
MW1 always reloaded shader caches every single time I turned it on
Im glad Im not the only one that struggled with this game. I am running a 2070 super and there are many times that it drops and struggles. Hope they fix it soon
I have a 2070 super as well and the dips are horrendous.
i also have a 2070 super and im getting barely 60 on all low.... The benchmark tells me its a stable 100 but when in practice its far from true
i got and rtx 3060 and setting all low/normal and got 50-60 fps ... btw make no diff on fps if i hae evrything on normal/high just feel bit more short laggs
Same with me on a 2070 super 6 months after launch and it still has horrendous drops
the bad stutter was mostly gone after i disabled on streaming texture, thats based from my experience playing the game so far lol
Whats the downside to thAt?
@@360Tarek Supposedly less detailed textures. But it's not really noticable unless you look side by side. Plus having it off saves space on your drive.
I agree with the color statement! My friend told me to change some settings in interface that makes the colors more vibrant. Filter 2 with tritonopia enabled
It happens to me also in the regular multiplayer with an i5 10600k and rtx 3060, no matter the resolution or settings, I’d get stutter and frame drops
I have 10400f and 3060ti i have so mutch fps drops and i dont know why its blury even the resilation scale is on 200
@@HzMuhamadelsupahul-jamallullah do you guys have maybe ping problems too? I have FTTH and low ms on speedtest but in warzone its often above 100 which is unplayable and idk if its servers fault or mine
@@Kubey. yes it has a lot of server problembs
@@HzMuhamadelsupahul-jamallullah at least I know that its not my problem
@@HzMuhamadelsupahul-jamallullah the blurr makes your eyes pop
Running a 3060 and a Ryzen 7 3800x and having pretty much the same experience, it sorts itself out eventually after a game or two but still have it in the back of my mind that frame drops are going to be the cause of death.
Jumping over to BF2042 and realising just how much work they have done on optimisation gives me that the devs will take notes
When loading in, I see the little tips that you can hide and then my game freezes and then I have to end it in task manager. Or I can make all my graphics at the lowest (even making render resolution 30) and then it loads me! But its like a powerpoint presentation, I legit get to see 1 frame every like 10 seconds. The gulag is a solid 20 fps though!
It sucks but im glad to see that the most expensive gpu can’t drop into warzone without the lag at first, I thought it was just me 😭
Fr. I was so sad. I thought my 3080 was bad. Was gonna cry 😂
Same with my 3070
@@dizhavoc2378 Weird... it doesn't happen on my 3070. Maybe it's because I have on-demand streaming off?
It's even worse when you build it yourself. I got so paranoid lol
Tbh the game constantly stutters all the way my playthrough but I've learned to live with it
The weirdest part is that I don't remember having this many issues like this on PC from the 2019 MW through Vanguard the same way that I have been on MW2... it's wild to me how unoptimized it is on PC this year...
I've had best results with the hotfix driver 526.61. No stuttering (except when jumping off the plane, that happens to everyone in my friend group) and not a single crash.
526.86 was stuttering and still crashing so I haven't even dared to try the latest one.
Also WZ2 is not in beta, DMZ is.
526.98 runs absolutely fine on my 3080. Only stutters I get: when the matchmaker finds a match. But thats on the dev's end to fix and optimize...
@@novocainDaimon Yeah it might but there is no incentive to update to it when it doesn't have any new optimizations for MW2.
2:30 It's hilarious because Warzone 2.0 is NOT in Beta, the Beta is for DMZ Only lmaooo
Fixed my stuttering by verifying the files to my suprise had 22 missing. Also turning off on demand texture streaming, game literally looks somehow the same without it.
That's not what fixed it. If you verify files again you'll see it'll say 22 again. I've had 33 missing and verified like 10 different times.
Damn, I was hoping this would be the issue :(
@@zWORMzGaming bro ur a big youtuber please, tell devs to optimize this game
@@jihnjohncayna hopefully someone from Activision sees this video. I'm not that big though.
I'll be making a video trying to fix the stuttering as well!
@@zWORMzGaming thanks man
This is very disappointing. Activision really needs to fix the FPS problem. I'm running an RTX 3060+ i5-11400 and cant get over 80 FPS on minimum graphics.
Same , around 90-80 on my rtx3060 although i have 150 + fps on other games.
@@itchigobleach2255 When I play War Thunder on Ultra setting with DLSS on quality I get 230+ fps. Why cod is so demanding we will never know 🤷♀️
The on-demand streaming textures is causing your lag. It's not really worth having that on since you're constantly downloading textures while you play. It's basically like downloading a game in the background the whole time while you play. I'm using the same gpu.
For reference, on a Ryzen 5 5600X, RTX 3070ti, I have ALL my settings on the lowest possible settings, and I still stutter, it is so unplayable it actually baffles me how this got released this early lol
@@StrafeY might be a cpu process issue? I'm running a 3070ti with a ryzen 9 5900x and I get like 100-120fps with no stutter and max settings. I do get the weird stutter in the plane though.
@@billclintongirlMy CPU process won't go above 30% with Warzone 2, no idea why, and I can't change the priority of warzone 2 either
@Nahue! 16GB 3800MHz, however it doesn't even use all of it, only uses 80% TOTAL with wz2 open
@Nahue! my friend has 64GB and has the same issues as me 😭
Putting texture resolution to very low improves CPU performance by quite a lot for some reason, it’s the most CPU heavy setting
Who wants ugly textures with new high end hardware
@@JustxLiving909 yea
@@JustxLiving909 people who play competitive and don't care about visuals
@dj Kplus I understand but I paid 4kUSD plus for my system some paid more for bleeding new tech I’m not lowering nothing below high or normal and I play at 1440p not 4k
I have the same problem with this game. Hard fps drops, and horrible frametime
I was getting microstutters until I turned off nvidia low latency and left it at default. You can max everything except particles, volumetrics, and shades and will get a big perf boost. I get 120 fps or so with a 3080ti at 3840x1600 which is almost 4k.
I’ll try that tomorrow thanks I also have a 3080ti running on 1440p
From my experience it's the opposite. I'm reaching more than 70 fps on High/Medium settings on my RX580, while WZ1 barely reached 60 on a good day on the lowest settings. Also no stutters, unlike the mess that was WZ1.
These are a few things that helped me remove stuttering in WZ1, might help here too:
- Disabling On Demand texture streaming.
- You really need more than 8GB of RAM, otherwise try using ISLC. It also helps if you have 16 gigs and still experience them.
- Make sure your Windows page file is on your SSD, otherwise the game is pretty much unplayable.
"Make sure your Windows page file is on your SSD, otherwise the game is pretty much unplayable" - sounds interesting
"You really need more than 8GB of RAM, otherwise try using ISLC. It also helps if you have 16 gigs and still experience them." - i used ISLC in WZ1, but i never felt the big difference on 16gb.
using older gpu driver could also help
Regarding the graphics, idk about more colors but I definitely think some more gloss is needed in the textures or shading. Everything seems kind of matte and pastel or cartoony.
Hey man!!! Always fun to watch you...
This game is a mess right now , i played it on my 6800xt and 3060 and it just stutters like hell...
@dj Kplus ...
Playing with a 5900x and 3080 at 1440p competitive settings. I lock it to 120fps and it feels smooth, sometimes there is stuttering. I do not get that low fps glitch when in the plane cut scene and while dropping.
Yeah I have a 5900x, 3090 fps locked at 100 for recording gameplay. No issues here either. Occasional stuttering though.
i have strange feeling its intel problem, and intel bottlenecks gpus in new warzone. every friend of mine with intel also has fps gliches, dips, stutters. once again intel sucks ass in modern gaming and people act like its not their fault. i have 5600x 1060 6gb and medium graphic preset, amd fsr ultra quality and i get smooth 80-100 fps
@@bigdaddyschin5692 tell me where you find these specs bro. Im here with a ryzen 5 5600x and gtx 1080ti for 3 years
@@NotMyStro what the fuck are you talking about,
it’s cuz the game glitches and renders EVERYONE jumping out which is why it lags😂
same problems as warzone 1 at launch stuttering high CPU usage stuttering when dropping... didn't learn anything from the first warzone
Are u planning to do a rtx 3080 video for warzone 2.0? That would be perfect! 😊
This game is a mess
this dude will do 30 videos on warzone 2 wich each GPU in the Existance
@@gosti500 I know im follwing over years but it would be helpful for me to order the gpu and monitor soon
Im not playing warzone 24/7 so im searching for an 4K monitor but Warzone would be better on a wqhd monitor
Worstcase to decide😂
@@Denniz69 im pretty confident a 3080 will do you very good in this game... or any game.. lol :D
@@Denniz69 what refresh rate monitor are you planning on getting? the 3080 will easily do 4k 60+ especially with dlss :)
i watchedd this just to see your reaction @ the lagspikes when u dropped out of the plane LOL, because i knew it would happen
There is a setting that changes how much VRAM is dedicated to MW2, if you have it max out try to lower it to 70. This helped me to fix most of the stutter
Yep .this worked for me also.i also ran the older driver.hotfix 522.25. On a 4090 not overclocked .1440p 250+ fps ryzen 7600x
Not defending Infinty Ward but I can see why optimization at launch is a problem. I know some game devs, and did some small stuff myself.
Optimization for frame drops usually comes down to:
1.Saving to disk too often
2. Lazy Loading, loading something when you need it
3. Load everything at startup (opposite of lazy loading), so you don't have to load anything after the game is ready to go
4. Downsize textures, or optimize textures to be a power of 2, packing textures into sprite sheets
5. Lower the time complexity of an algorithm
6. Don't do unnecessary tasks in update loops
7. Bad collision detection, or just too many objects that have colliders
8.Too many objects on screen9
9.. Too much masking
10. Cache results so you don't have to recompute.
And there's a shit ton of more things that's too much to explain.
The engine that is being used ( IW 9.0 ) is new itself and takes time to break in and optimize itself overtime, just like any other game and their respective game engine.
More GPU's Kryzpppp. Appreciate you testing the high end ones, also test the low end ones.
Yep, I get the same resource-loading lag in Warzone... I'm sorry that you're experiencing this but I'm glad to know that it's not just me...
They could add a separate settings options for warzone. I get 100 fps on multiplayer vut i get 70 on big warzone
You are probably cpu bound in warzone if that's the case
i get the same fps with a GTX 1070 TI and Ryzen 3 3100
That would be a pretty nice idea if they let you make different graphical settings profiles for warzone
Ive got a 12900ks and 3090ti at 3440x1440p I get huge stutters every 60 seconds its driving me insane. happens in mw2 mp also. i went back to w10 its slightly better but the stutter is still there
Damn... My MW2 MP is super smooth. It's just this one that stutters.
Completely unacceptable.
Guess u need a ram upgrade
Or power plan
@@Birdman._. I don’t. I have 32gb trident z royal elites.
Try change to studio driver form October 18
Same dude. Its so annoying playing with that
Same here, I'm having to play all low 1080p 70% render FSR with an RX 6600, terrible stutters and optimization
I have a rx 6600 xt and it runs perfectly without any stutters on max settings. No complaints on my side and genuinely enjoying the game!
same gpu but the game cant pass 120 fps even lowest settings
what's your cpu?
i got rx 6700 xt with ryzen 5 3600 and no matter the settings i cannot get above 90 fps :)
@@yungblade4382 same Processor but the utilization is about 10% ingame
Alienware OLED monitor in HDR makes the color pop like crazy… love it.
Forget HDR, people always talk about HDR, but it has nothing left in a multiplayer game because it increases input lag, HDR improves the contrast ratio by a lot WHICH IS A BAD thing for a game like this because actually u wanna have the DARK spots in game bright, and the BRIGHT spors darker, to see enemys better
And when u don’t care about HDR, IPS is a way better value then OLED or Mini LED
Mini LED actually is useless too because enabling local dimming also increases input lag.
@ zWormz Gaming: Stutters might come from ‘On demand texture streaming’ where it loads better textures from the network.
It what now? I haven't installed it but it's probably hundreds of gigabytes again, and it does what?
@@brei2670 its actually not
@@h0und908 Actually not what? Downloading textures from the internet or hundreds of GB big?
No
Correction: DP 1.4a is actually capable of doing 4K 240Hz :)
Graphics is amazing in this game, but only in campaign and multiplayer. Warzone graphics looks disgusting. The map is flat and grey. And trees, omg, how could they made trees look like it's from 2010. If they cannot do trees, why don't them make just big City map. No trees, just buildings. Verdansk looked awesome, warm and comfy. There is nothing comfy with new warzone map. It is shit, i will never love this map and nostalgy about it. Ok, it is not so bad, because it could be jungle map, that is worst thing ever.
Agreed, I would love to see more vibrant colours and better map design. Some areas are just maps from the MP..
i laughed when u died jumping in the water
I died inside 😂
Love how to games looks, both the attention to details and colors
you're crazy
You seem to have had horrible first experience! I've not seen any of this so far.
I played for quite a while yesterday with my 2060. Performance was lower than expected especially when in that intro plane scene. But there is alot of bugs in the game itself, from my weapon not loading to server disconnections.
Yea 20 series user myself (2080Ti) and I’m having MAD issues with this game especially multiplayer. Fps drops like I’ve never seen before and stuttering at random times especially when I’m ADS. But i had it nice and smooth at 1440p and was capped at 158FPS and was handling it well, then my settings got reset and they have SO much extra crap we don’t need, i forgot what settings i was using lol this game is a joke and a half
I get 60-70fps 1080p low setting in warzone 2.0 . I was getting 80 in warzone 1.0 1080p high settings, terrible optimization for some cards.
The thing is that Call of Duty seems to run better on AMD hardware (it makes sense since it's developed for console primarly and PS5/XBX got AMD chipset)
Looking at mw2019 (Warzone 1.0) go check the performance: i9 12900k w/ 3090 Ti, and then check same Warzone perfomance but with 5800X3D w/ RX 6950 XT, you'll see that the AMD configuration destroyes (obv without DLSS) the Intel/nVidia config
But it's just a thing of these two games: MW1 and MW2 :/
Personally I used to have 160-170 fps in Warzone 1.0 in 2560x1440 DLSS perfomance and low settings, it was good in the end, playable and I could benefit a bit from my 2K 270Hz monitor
But now in MW2 is different, cannot run more than 110-120fps on minimum settings with all DLSS configs/Turning off/Lowering AA.... Nothing works
Turning my settings from ultra to minimum gives me just a 10-12 fps boost
So in the end I leaved everything on max for maximum visual, turned the DLSS on Perfomance and turned on motion blur on both world and weapon to hide the f****ng stutter that 110fps gives and it seems that this does the trick for me
You should give it a try, and it doesn't ruin my aim (just in this rare case, I usually always keep it off)
I thought I was going crazy when I saw that my fps barely changed going from low to high settings. Good to know that other people are having this issue. I can't believe the game launched like this and I'm concerned if it will improve at all in the future.
@@STSummit no game will same no update for performnce or stability for PC...
6:53🤣😂well done!!!!
I would like to see how the recommended specs do
runs 40 fps at 720p with 90% scaling
@@mindofvirtuoso3358 is the 1060 that bad in this
@@mindofvirtuoso3358 i am trying to run it on my pc but it crashes for some reason
@@parasgupta8411 1060 should not suffer that much. A 1050ti could run the big maps on mw2 in 57 fps on average with some settings tweaking. I think we have seen different charts
Warzone 2 runs like a GMOD map with over 400+ mods installed on a laptop from 2007
I think these stutters and fps drops are nvidia driver issue because while playing warzone 2 yesterday i was getting around 130-150 fps or above on my rx 6500xt on fsr quality while my friend on rtx 2060 was getting barley around 100 fps on dlss performance on low graphics at 1080p , also when he stream the game on discord at 720p30 his fps dropped to 30-40 while mine barley dropped.
true on my rx 6700 xt i had perfect frametime and around 117-130 fps on 1080p without upscaling but i have to say the game couldn't utilise my gpu well it was only running like on 70% instead of 100% and my cpu was like 50-60%
I have a 2060 aswell, I get 90-100 fps on 1080p high settings with dlss quality, so I have no idea why your friend experiences these performance issues, maybe the other specs are the problem. For a comparison, here is mine:
Ryzen 7 5800x, 32gb ddr4 3600mhz RAM, Asus RTX 2060 6gb version
why the hell would he run DLSS on 1080p low? Might as well smear Vaseline Jelly all over the screen.
@@kenzohkw Lmfaooo
@@capalotsir1506 well its 2060 on laptop not pc and without dlss the fps were way bad
Ive just had to buy a £235 SSD just to run it as my HDD couldn't handle it, ridiculous considering RDR2 runs amazing for me at ultra.
5800x3D is the king here...I seen a video with a 3080 / 5900x and performance was almost exactly the same at 1080p and 1440p max settings..1440p with DLSS quality pretty much made no difference ethier (1080p internal)
5900x (same for 5800x, 5600x) really struggling to push a 3080..and the 5800x3D pushes much more powerful 4080 easily
Game manages to run at any preset from Minimum to Balanced at 1440p without any Upscaling methods turned on on my 3060 Ti. Once you try to go to either Ultra or Extreme even with NVIDIA DLSS turned on at 1440p, the game hard crashes back to desktop & resets my display driver & my RAM. Also any preset you try will always have frame hitching/micro-stuttering problems. I have a Ryzen 7 5700G & my RAM is 16GB DDR4 @ 3200 MHz. This game is only halfway complete & shouldn't be touched until Infinity Ward patches this broken mess.
The Game Graphics have improved drastically, saying it feels like first wazone is just sad. Models have much more detail and quality, game render is even more beautiful then other Cods and last Battlefield, shadows are really detailed, lightning design is really good and the level design is also really good.
The Attention to detail and quality of the game is really Insane even more for a free to play and beta stage game. But i recognize the need for optimization.
Now i must say im not a cod player i came from Battlefield as a frustrated player by 2042 and other survival games, and im just in love with the DMZ of Warzone 2, there is definitely room for improvement but it just feels good, the gameplay is really good, the movement is really smooth and i feel like the gun play is really fun.
About Bugs and Crashes: I Have crashed maybe 2 Times before the release of the new Nvidia Driver, but after it, i could run smoothly in 60 Fps+ that is awesome for my low-mid end PC.
The dive made me almost die !! hilarious!
😂😂
Was having problems with my internet so I couldnt watch the video properly, but going by what I saw, given the fact it seemed to improve as you traversed the terrain dynamic shader compilation could've been what was causing the stutters.
Did you try going back over the areas you'd been in with setting higher again? Could have just appeared better because the shaders were already compiled by the time you tried lower settings.
I have the same issue on 4090. It doesn't work that way. It renders things on certain distance. Like if you will go go forward for 1m and backward for 1m textures will pop
Try rolling back your driver to 522.25 and see how it plays. The last two Nvidia driver updates were terrible for MW2 including the most recent one that you're running.
4080 doesn't support those older drivers :(
@@zWORMzGaming good point
Well thats sucks because with 522.25 my 4090 runs smooth as silk
@@bundyho1 I still get the massive stutter when jumping off the plane with 522.25 and 4090
An interesting comparison would be the 3090 ti vs 4080 because of the vram.
@@nelphieblessed his CPU isn't even old
if he was playing in 1080p i could help you out with that one. i dont play in 4k at all as i prefer higher refresh rate w out dlss. its honestly why i came to watch the vid thought he might be in 1080p. my game doesnt stutter or anything at all though. my mp warzone2 and dmz play perfectly fine. i tuned my system though as well
@@parkersgarage4216 you shouldn't have to play at 1080p if you're buying a $1200 brand new graphics card that's dumb AF also it's not the frame rate that's bad it's the studdering and inconsistent frame pacing so no matter how high the frame rate is that doesn't really help
i agree and i could play at 1440 or 4k if i want. The thing is though your gpu bound at 1080p on low settings which is fucking sad. your right about the frame pacing in this pos game though. the higher fps does you 0 good at all. its literally like they handicap you if you do get higher fps. i can not get a steady 240 after the patch. its almost as if cod gimped frame rates or even pc's not sure which. i was getting 290+ before the patch. now i cant even get 240 steady. as far as im concerned all these gpu's are just a scam minor incremental upgrade anyways. i built my first pc which is the one im on. i now know dont waste your money as its literally a waste. my system doesnt stutter though thankfully. i couldnt play it if i was getting this experience. the damn 4080 is a scam anyways as the card isnt worth it. i wont buy an nvidia card anymore after seeing how they treat consumers no thanks.
@@parkersgarage4216 I mean I agree with the new Nvidia cards sucking but this game is just poorly optimized even with high framerate it studders like shit
Love your videos man ❤ and I have a 1650 4gb and i7 10700k and 16gb of ram dual channel and I’m on low settings well cod low lol and I didn’t get those bad stutters and low fps in beginning and I get 60 plus but yea not as smooth as multiplayer im gonna wait till warzone gets more polished before I play it more tho PS. I’m getting a 3060 to replace my 1650 should be quite the upgrade can’t wait i’ve been binge watching your 30 series benchmarks lol
You should turn off on demand texture streaming, it downloads textures as you play but will cause stutters and lag...
It dosnt fix it
This is really relieving to see, I have a 1060 and wanted this game to play the campaign, I aint too bothered about multiplayer on cods the campaigns are quite fun, however I played warzone 2.0 last week and in the lobby it was terrible, i have 32gb ram and a gtx 1060 and it was horrible in the waiting area, when i got in game it horrible, I just don't want this to happen in main campaign, but im abit more confident now i've seen this, assuming performance issues is down to optimization is a relief.
For max settings, the pop-in isn't impressive. Shadows & grass only seem to come into full LOD & resolution about 5 metres or so in front of you.
Yeah that's annoying as well...
@@zWORMzGaming Xbox series x has no stutter at 120 fps mode. Which is like dynamic 4k rez
lmfao ur reaction was exactly the same as mine
went in with my overkill build gettin crazy stutters but its gettin better by the day, servers r so packed
Turn digital vibrance up inside nvidia control panel. Also use 10 bit color and nvidia colors. All in nvidia control panel
You can increase color saturation ingame as well
I'm gonna use this GPU for 1440P on a 180HZ monitor. Was using a 1080 before. This can actually max out games and hit my max refres rate or come close. Can't do that in 4k. I prefer high refresh rates 1440p is already clear enough imo.
4k def helps in this game, this game on itsself is so blurry so more pixels will deff help for spotting enemies.
@@budgetking2591 DLSS is blurry af. Dont use it. Better to use FidelityCAS.
Got my first 4K 144hz monitor today in comparison with my 1440p 240hz G7, never played on 4K before.
I can’t get 240fps with my i7 12700 but I get around 210-220 in 1440p, and in 4K I can get 145-150 fps, and while I don’t feel any difference between 150 and 210 fps, I feel a noticable difference in terms of visibilty when I play few rounds with the 4K monitor and then switch to 1440p
4K144/165hz is def the way to go, but it’s hard to run
When the first Warzone originally launched I had a Radeon VII. It ran really well with everything maxed. No ray tracing obviously. Then I got a 2080ti and Warzone still ran well with everything maxed, including ray tracing. 144hz pretty much locked in 1080p and then in 1440p after getting a new monitor. Then at some point they started implementing patches and my frames would drop a bit, then a bit more. Eventually it would wind up sitting around 110-120, everything maxed, no RT. Regular multiplayer never had this issue. MW2 had weird graphic glitches in multiplayer for me on a 3090, everything maxed, never any DLSS. They seem to have been fixed. Not hopeful for Warzone 2 once I finally jump in.
FYI RayTraycing in Warzone was a placebo option , it was disabled early on when Warzone came out but they left the option in the menus.
First game after shader compilation will stutter, could be reflex too, but yeah the game is still unoptimized like most PC games today because they dont care, its more about the console space!
Honestly, If I wasn't told about WZ2, I'd just think it's WZ1 with some updates. Performance is pretty bad I must say, considering it looks almost identical to the first one and yes, I agree, I would like more color into the game, it's just too dull. By the way, my battery is on 69% while watching the video 🤣
Yes for sure. The game is the exact same, just a different map and horrible movement mechanics compared to wz 1
Literally the gulag is the only thing I can see different compared to the old game,it Literally looks the same still🤷🏽♂️
01:56 the 4080 became and Intel HD 4000 for a few moments lol
apparently if you change the renderworkcount in the config to the amount of perf cores you have (intel CPU's) this fixes it, not sure though
I did it got a fps boost of 10-15 and my game isn’t stuttering anymore , I play on a 1070ti
6:55 My man played too much Minecraft))
Strange as it may seem, but WZ 2.0 is not utilising all the CPU threads. I’ve watched another benchmark with a 4th gen Core i7 and the utilisation was always at 50%. Maybe there is a workaround by changing the amount of worker threads in the configuration file. That shall solve the freezes when the CPU is working on streaming the map data.
Game is optimized on physical cores (not virtual like most of the games) and single core performance is another limiting factor in this game. That's why 8th & 9th gen 6 Cores i5s can outperform most of the 4C/8T CPU models up to 10105F & 7700Ks.. New DX12 Multiplayer games don't benefit from the threads so much unfortunately. 4th i7 is also so freaking old btw, if anyone who still want to use a 4 Cores CPU with a decent mid range card in 2022 and for the next years, they better be looking for at least 12th/13th i3 or something because of the beast single threading performance..
@@Augmented_Realismthe game should utilise more threads. It’s just dumb to see it’s utilising only physical cores
@@thevigilante8523 We'll see if any patch would do that or not, I've no problem with my both i5-7500 + GTX 1060 and i7-11700K + RTX 3080 rigs so far, smooth experience..Btw, similar thing was also happening in Spider-Man Remastered too, HT/SMT supported with a slow single threaded CPUs run that game so terrible. So single core performance and physical core counts are becoming more important in new DX12 games (they were also actually important before) I don't see such a big problem on that actually..
For me personally, Windows 11 was the issue, for context. I have an RTX 3060, a Ryzen 5 5600x, and 16 gigs of ram. When I first installed the game and played I noticed something off, and the something was that I was running at a solid 73 fps on average. So i tried everything, looked up guides, and updated my drivers, hell I even bought new parts, so as a last ditch effort I downloaded a fresh install of windows 10, and like magic my game was running at 150 to 170 fps on average. Keep in mind that going back to windows 10 can cause some issues with your computers files, so I really don't recommend doing this unless your able to perform the installation of windows safely. So that's my story hope it helps or does something of use :)
Apologies for the poor grammar. I wrote this junk at 4 in the morning.
Parabéns pelo canal pelos benchmarks e pelos reviews, conheci o canal a pouco e vi todos os vídeos da RTX 3060TI e decidi que será minha próxima GPU.
Abraço do Brasil 🇧🇷🇵🇹
quanto ta uma 3060 no Brasil amigo?
@@mullerstephan 2k na média, pelo Aliexpress da pra encontrar por 1,2 -1,5k
@@mullerstephan uma 3060TI você consegue encontrar em promoção na Kabum por uns 2500 em média, a 3060 por cerca de 2000 +/-
Importando você consegue achar mais barato porém sempre há o risco de ser taxado
@@osmarkolbet7 ta certo. E as placas de uma ou duas geracoes atras, tipo 2080 ou 1080? sao mais em conta e faceis de achar?
@@mullerstephan essas são mais difíceis de achar, 2060 tu ainda acha bastante, mas 1080 ou 2080 tem poucas no mercado, a comparação um 2060 tu consegue achar de 1500 a 2000 dependendo de marca e loja
The part where he died in water was so funny 😂
Você esperou os shaders compilarem por completo ?
Sim, todas as vezes que dei restart
Damm this sounds like Latin. As a Dutchy that sounds beautiful ahahaha
@@samoerai6807 If I'm not making a mistake, the Portuguese language did come from vulgar Latin. That must be why:)
@@samoerai6807 Translation:
*Eduardo Bonini Sinhoeretti*
Did you wait for the Shaders to compile completely?
*ZWORMz Gaming*
Yes, everytime I restarted the game.
I'm not a very good spanish speaker, but my level still grants me the ability to understand their portuguese !
Those looking for a boost: The game runs MUCH better on steam. Minimal stutters, and my fps went from ducking down to 80 or so to a stable 160.
True?
@@marcelobra1 Yep. Was unplayable on battlenet for me.
@@Jk-zv6tz thanks for tip..
Id love to buy that gpu but the pricing and the real prices in my country are nearly 2x of msrp
And an rtx 3080 was cheap against that one
Hard to say but AMD is best option now (Im in love with Raytracing but i cant pay that in future😁)
Even on Nvidia RT gets a lot less FPS compared to pure raster, I'd be happy to get a cheaper AMD.
An RTX 3080 is still an amazing GPU that will play any of these games just fine, I'm not sure why people now need a 4090 etc to just play these kinds of shooters... if you are playing these at 4k you are doing it wrong.
@@hariskhan01 I know im playing on an rtx card and want to upgrade to an rtx 3080 or 4080 because it makes no sense with my gpu 😊
@@hariskhan01 But AMD is much smarter ur right
@@choatus Im buying an rtx 3080 now because the difference is not worth the money at all
Ngl this is the most entertaining spec tester I’ve ever seen 6:52
06:53 - Noone saw that coming. ;🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Im having framerate issues with my 3080 ti too, it made me feel like the card is really bad :D
Brokenfield 2042: Finally! a worthy opponent 😎😎.
Good video.
The color on my monitor is pretty damn good. I increased the color saturation in the nvidia control panel to 85% for better color.
I'm running at 110-130 fps on a 3080ti at 1440p completely maxed out settings. Not great considering the game doesn look that great and has tons of pop in and muddy textures but certainly playable.
Doesn’t look great? 😂
@@nikobellic8069 graphically yeah it's pretty ugly for how badly it runs on a lot of hardware. I can think of a dozen PS4 only games that look better than this does on PC with maxed out settings.
@@ancientflames what?. It’s looks great on series x. Especially campaign
Jumping out the plane was $650 per frame haha
OG MW2 looking at MW2 2: "Pathetic!"
1:58 2 Fps with the 4080 😂👌 Well Done Activision 😎
Another year claiming "its a brand new engine guys!", another year crediting idTech on the back of the physical case... I don't know what CoD has done to make the Quake 3 engine handle large worlds, but whatever method they are using is not up to snuff. They would be better off making Warzone an actual standalone on a 3rd party engine like CryEngine that is made for such things, and keep their engine optimized for the rest of the game. Instead they try to do both and do each poorly because of compromises.
i totally agree my pc meets recommended requirements and i have to play on lowest with 60-70 and its unplayable
Is there any optimizations that were made outside of the game cause im stuck at 60-50% gpu usage no matter what settings I use and it's driving me nuts.
I'm also stuck around that too. I'm pretty sure it's happening for everyone.
2080Ti with an i7-12700K and 32GB of RAM and I’m struggling in multiplayer at 1440p to stay at 150-160fps but it’s starting to smooth itself out but yeah this game as a whole is not optimized very good AT ALL. I realize im using a 4 year old GPU but it’s on par with a 3070 and my CPU isn’t bad with 12c and 20t and the GPU has only been in use for a year, I’m the first person to use this FTW3 2080Ti so there’s not much ware and tare on it. But yeah idk what settings to use anymore they have WAY TOO MUCH upscaling options i have a feeling having that many settings might be messing some things up…
When you said FOV I thought you said Applebee's and I became Hungry.
When the original Warzone came out I was getting 170 fps with a 3900X/GTX 1080 Ti and now in Warzone 2.0 I am getting around 170 fps with a 5950X/RTX 3090... This game is horribly optimized. With the same settings in Warzone I get 250-300 fps on my 5950X/RTX 3090 and Warzone 2.0s graphics aren't anything better than what we saw in the 1st iteration.
Very Nice Bro Keep It Up
These games are the reason I started playing on high and 120FPS lock. For the most part, every game runs the same.
I have a Ryzen 5600x, 32gb ram, and a 3090. I’m playing 80% of 4K, max settings. I run it locked at 85fps. No stutters.
The PC version was definitely an after thought. Good thing I chose the PS5 version instead. I may not get greater than 120fps but at least i rarely see too far below it.