To clarify, at 3:54 I said zombie VILLAGES, not VILLAGERS. The audio picked me up kind of weirdly there, my bad. I've had a couple of confused comments, and rightly so lol - zombie villagers are one of the most useful features in the game from an economic standpoint. Thanks for all the love this video is getting by the way!
Hi i agree with your video, however i would consider creators wanted to add some details to loor (and that loor is actually hidden and person who is not searching cant see direction)
Well worst is kind of not the appropriate term. Was 1.10 lacluster? Big yes. But did it hurt or negatively impacted the game? Not really. Beta 1.8’s terrain change or 1.9’s controversy is by definition the worst
It did hurt the game, by completely ignoring the problems of 1.9 and not doing anything to save a community that was clearly fracturing down the middle. Is it actually the worst? Maybe not in some ways. Is it very close to it - I sure think so. See what you're saying though, thanks for commenting :)
@@MagmaMelon i get your point but 1.10 did not hurt the game, 1.9 did. 1.10 was expected to clean the mess that 1.9 left however that is not really what makes an update bad. Though I admit 1.10 shouldv’e atleast tried to fix the mess that 1.9 caused. IMO what makes an update hurt the game is less so about the amount of changes in an update but moreso what those changes are. 1.11 is considered a bad update but I guarantee you that the majority of the community can’t live without shulker boxes and firework elytras. Though I also do get what your saying:)
IMO 1.10 is the most underwhelming update in the game. It deserves its constant bullying and low ranking by the community. Though it didn’t really destroy the game like 1.14’s poor performance and pretty much made villagers the grindiest mechanic in the existence in gaming. When I look at updates I tend to separate amount of features, quality of features, and cohesiveness of the new features with the old ones. Hope I explained my thinking well lol
@@justanordinaryguy6568 Very fair, you explained well. 1.14 was pretty good content-wise I personally think (though not perfect), but server performance was just awful.
@@MagmaMelon yes in terms of content alone 1.14 is easily the best update. 1.14 added fun, unique, impactful, and creative mechanics, not only that but you can easily say that 1.14 had much much more features compared to 1.13 and 1.16. Though the performance was too much. I got tired of watching mc videos having 10fps, buggy interactions, and rendering issues to the point I waited until 1.15 cause those issues were solved by then. Sorry got alittle off track there😅😅
Honestly, 1.7 may be what I consider to be the best update. It gave us the most stable version of the game, while still delivering new biomes and features. The absolute powerhouse that 1.7.10 was gave us the best mods in this game's history.
@@NH4NO3NPK 100%. 1.7.10 is the best version of the game, to this day. Still, 1.19 is better for survival, with all the new features, but the modded and pvp aspects of 1.7 are what made me fall in love. As well as the fact that it runs at 500fps on my aging system, in vanilla, and 1000+ with optimization mods
Were getting free updates to a game we paid $20 for a decade ago. Not every update will be a completely new game. Even small components over the years make the game immensely better
1.10 came after the biggest division in Minecraft history. It was lifeless and lazy, and fixed none of the problems that were killing the community. It's not the only cause, but updates like this, and 1.12, were part of the reason that the game died around this time. I agree that not every update has to be gamechanging (see what I said about 1.20), but there's a difference between small-scale and random, useless features.
Okay one price doesn’t matter i would expect a free mobile game to rule out updates B minecraft is top 5 most played games thats a lot of 20$ that has a store and other ways of currently making money C doesn’t excuse lazy, poor timed or ignoring issues
i remember there being quite a long gap between 1.8 and 1.9, and Mojang kinda wanted the next update to take less time to release and we were all kinda curious what it'd be called, since after 1.9 it should've been 2.0 :D but then 1.10 did release, and Minecraft had a huge dip in popularity for a few years lmao, the update probably fueled the process
2.38K subscribers? Man, you've been growing! Needless to say, I'm pretty proud of you. With the great content you make, I'm sure you'll earn many more! It's been great to see your channel grow all this time.
I remember when this update came out. It was one of the first ever updates I not only noticed but also went to explore by myself. I can't describe the levels of disappointment I felt when finding out that Polar Bears did nothing, husks and strays were more of the same and the blocks were rare. The only thing that rivaled that was my reaction to bats
I kinda agree, but I can't help but like this update. Probably because it was one of the first updates that happened after I started playing Minecraft, but still. I have good memories of it
1.10 is not the worst upate at all Strays are free slowness arrows early game Polar bears drop fish on death so if you by any chance run out of food you can just kill one to get fish Husks are great for being test dummies as they dont burn in daylight unlike regular zombies and their code can be re-used to make simple custom mele hostile mobs Structure blocks, literally they save so mutch time when making a mega build on creative and structure voids can be used to make it so that when you place a structure, it wont get buried by surrounding blocks as the structure void will replace other blocks in its place with air Bone blocks are good if you have too mutch bonemeal in your inventory Allowed fishing rods to pull items Mobs refuse to walk on magma blocks so you can use them to stop mobs from entering certain parts of your base without walls And thats not even mentioning how useful the stuff became in newer upates
awesome video, this one as well as the hermitcraft 1 were really well written and I bet your others are as well. After watching your hermitcraft video and realising that you clearly have a lot of expertise on the topic, I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining Superflat SMP, because while the name might make it sound like some sort of challenge server with the Superflat, that actually makes very few features inaccessible and just adds a bit of an unique spin. Other than that it is very vanilla with only quality-of-life mods added and a hermitcraft-ish playstyle of shops and bases. But to be perfectly honest we don't live up to the quality of regular fun interactions and the liveliness of hermitcraft, and I feel like, if you are actually a dedicated player you could be an awesome addition on the road to getting there. Feel free to say no if you see this, I'd much rather know that you're not interested than be ignored.
I'd rather not thanks, since my content is more information and opinion-based than actual gameplay. Thanks for the offer though, your channel looks pretty cool so keep up the good work. Thanks for watching!
1.10 didn't harm the game, therefore it's automatically not the worst update. It's probably the most lacking, but certainly not the worst. That award would have to go to 1.13
I don't like to call the frostburn update the worst update. Not even close to being the best update but a few features I liked. The problem is those features more work alongside other more developed features. Magma blocks became more useful later in the aquatic update, wart bricks can be useful in building, bone blocks are very useful as a white Piller. Husks and Strays are great in theory, I feel like they should be linked to a structure. Perhaps a desert tomb for the husk, with a Mummy miniboss at the end.
And now we have 1.20.5-1.21 It's a bit chaotic but damn it looks good With the april fool's potato update being potentially used as a test for future mechanics such as the grapling hook and the floater, it can only look more promising
Mojang is very lazy there’s no doubt. But variety I love random things, tho I am a builder and not to fussed on function. But I appreciate functionality quite a lot. I just like pretty things to build with…
I think the mob variations were really something they should've expanded upon more. I guess drowned got added in 1.13, but other than that, biome variants aren't really something they've messed with.
Well 1.21 did expand on this by adding the bogged wich is a swamp variant of the skeleton, it has less hp, a slower fire rate and can even be sheared to get mushrooms
@@lazarpetrovic1671 I commented this before that was announced. It is pretty cool to see, especially in conjunction with a unique mob. Best of both worlds
It was a pretty "bland" update indeed, I remember how it wasn't even talked about all that much back in the days it released compared to 1.9 when it was being teased and snapshots revealed. 1.10 was I believe one of the "rushed" updates that was just tossed in to add new stuff. Though I am surprised to hear talk of this rather "bland" update considering what happened with 1.19 that update also was rather directionless and a bit themeless as well, despite being called the "Wild Update" there wasn't much involving the wild or wilderness except the new Mangrove Swamp and frogs and the fireflies which got removed and the other features were literally supposed to be part of the Caves & Cliffs Update. I'd say 1.19 was a lot more of a failure as it got people over excited and then disappointed after release, and didn't bring that much fresh content making it more like an exaggerated polishing update, 1.10 was just more or less teased and released without getting the community overjoyed and still added some new content and mobs.
Some good points! I agree that 1.19 fell down a bit in the direction department and was overhyped, but it did at least feel relevant. Compare the number of videos with "warden" in the title to the ones with "stray". I also have an earlier video reviewing 1.19, you may want to check it out.
I feel like people nowadays throw around the term of "Mojang being lazy" way too much to the point where it is lost its meaning but I feel like 1.10 was one of the few instances where the term feels Justified. 1.10 feels like a mediocre mod made by a pre-teen except it's actual official content.
I’m sorry- zombie villagers useless? Don’t get me wrong I agree with everything else but I HAVE to point out how you probably overlooked the curing mechanic and all of its advantages.
I was talking about zombie villages, the villages which generate all abandoned. Listening back now I totally see how you heard me wrong, that was my bad on the audio.
@@MagmaMelon no no I misheard and didn’t take into consideration you could be talking about zombie villages, my apologies! I do think zombie villages have so much potential and I hope mojang will do something interesting with them some day.
It's fine - I don't think 1.20 really is game-changing, but not every update needs to be. My point is that the Frostburn Update was lazy, and 1.20 isn't.
@@canman_sucks_sub_twi Definitely, when it comes out in full. A lot of new stuff has been announced recently and I have a lot of thoughts. Watch this space!
While 1.10 is the weakest update for minecraft so far for most, I would have to give it to 1.12.2. 1.10 added a secret block called the structure block that made modders and those who wanted to move large builds to other worlds without world edit so much easier. This one addition I think makes it better than 1.12.2.
I like both updates because with 1.10 they added variants of the skeleton and zombie (those being the stray and husk) along with polar bears and like you said, structure blocks also added the mesa biome HOWEVER i think that 1.12 is also really good as the glazed terracota can be used to make really cool patterns wich is perfect for building just like the structure block
First time seeing this guys vids, but I agree 1.10 was the lamest update yet, but, this guy seems super nit picky and super critical to the point that not much will make this guy happy about literally everything?
Disagree - it's just a critical video. In fact, the 1.20 section is a lot more optimistic than a large percentage of people are being about 1.20. I love most updates of this game, and I love the game in general - the reason I talk about its problems so much is because I love it. Totally understand where you're coming from though.
1.10 honestly felt like left over ideas they had for the past few updates and it felt like it was an update they wanted to get out quickly after the long time it took to do 1.9
I'm an archaeology student and honestly I'm dreading trails and tales. Minecraft is neither embracing the excitement of tomb raider style pop culture archaeology, nor showing respect towards the reality of archaeology. I feel like Minecraft already has fantastic archaeology elements without this update. The temples just need to be found in more biomes and have some randomness to them like dungeons do. The nether fossils are also great and I would like them to be more present in the overworld. But this brushing up sand to find blueprints for decorative items - not even decent loot itself - is so lame. Nobody digs up ancient remains with the goal of replicating it artistically- we do it to obtain knowledge or, if you are a tomb raider, to get treasure. It's so strange that they tried to be so careful with this and ended up being more misinformative because of it. If I dig in an archaeological deposit, I'm going to mostly find charcoal. But because Minecraft makes it seem so down to earth, people will think that pictures on pottery and gold and diamonds are the norm. At least when you have a tomb raider scenario you are establishing what most people nowadays can recognize as a fantasy. Now for the things I am not specifically qualified to say but will say nonetheless. When it comes to the cherry blossoms- eugh. I would personally much rather see an autumnal biome to bring diversity in leaf colours into the game, before we start with pink flowers. And then they made the wood pink, too! It feels patronisingly girl-coded, like they believe more women will play if they can make pink houses and boats. And at the same time since there are no unnatural wood colours outside purple and cyan, it's such an outsider and can't be used alongside the naturals in a practical way. It purely exists for someone who feels like making their entire build pink, and that just segregates it even more from most male players. Imagine if we had an ebony wood. Or something more blood red. Grey like the bark of the cherry or acacia. Or an almost white wood since birch is so yellow. But no. Baby pink.
This is a really fascinating perspective, thanks so much for commenting! I'll definitely talk at length about archaeology when I make a 1.20 review video, and I think that there are both really good elements and some things that are super inaccurate and annoying. It certainly had a lot of potential as a system, and only a small part of that potential has been delved into, it feels. Thanks again for commenting, your profession is really interesting!
@@MagmaMelon Personally I would prefer that archaeology, if added to the game, should be more ingrained in the overall system instead of an optional side quest for decor or a tedious way to get diamonds and gold. I would like to see each site contain a 'clue' that is similar to an ender pearl in that they lead you to a site the world only has one of. An ancient capital, perhaps, or a mega village, or a portal to yet another dimension. I won't even blame them if everything leads to Atlantis.
@@demo2823 The idea of one structure leading to another certainly has interesting gameplay potential. I'd be hesitant to have structures which only generate once per world, but this is definitely food for thought!
It annoys me that you automatically linked cherry wood to being feminine. Cherry blossom trees are a very real thing in nature, and their pinkness is a very real thing to them, even if for a very short time of the year. Just like how we have several naturally pink flowers in the game like tulips, peonies, petals, and (arguably), lilacs and alliums. New wood types are an exiting addition because they give us slabs, stairs, and fences to build with as well. And, aside from blocks dyed pink such as wool, terracotta, glass, etc, there aren’t really any pink blocks in the game, unless you count granite as pink. So, finally having a pink building material that isn’t originated from dyes is a very exiting addition for many of us. I don’t see why you have to bring gender into this. A lot of us have been wanting cherry trees in the game for years. Another thing. Minecraft wood is intentionally colored unrealistically to make it more versatile for building. The original mangrove wood color was too similar to jungle, so they made it a lot more red to make it better for building. If cherry wood was colored a lot more realistically, it may not be as “fun” to use in builds.
![Stromae, Pomme - “Ma Meilleure Ennemie” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1F3OGIFnW1k/mqdefault.jpg)
To clarify, at 3:54 I said zombie VILLAGES, not VILLAGERS. The audio picked me up kind of weirdly there, my bad. I've had a couple of confused comments, and rightly so lol - zombie villagers are one of the most useful features in the game from an economic standpoint.
Thanks for all the love this video is getting by the way!
Hi i agree with your video, however i would consider creators wanted to add some details to loor (and that loor is actually hidden and person who is not searching cant see direction)
@mxp official it is pronounced lore 😅
They should have bundled 1.10, 1.11 and 1.12 in one update
They released all of them in a short time frame to compensate for how long 1.9 took.
Well worst is kind of not the appropriate term. Was 1.10 lacluster? Big yes. But did it hurt or negatively impacted the game? Not really. Beta 1.8’s terrain change or 1.9’s controversy is by definition the worst
It did hurt the game, by completely ignoring the problems of 1.9 and not doing anything to save a community that was clearly fracturing down the middle.
Is it actually the worst? Maybe not in some ways. Is it very close to it - I sure think so. See what you're saying though, thanks for commenting :)
@@MagmaMelon i get your point but 1.10 did not hurt the game, 1.9 did. 1.10 was expected to clean the mess that 1.9 left however that is not really what makes an update bad. Though I admit 1.10 shouldv’e atleast tried to fix the mess that 1.9 caused. IMO what makes an update hurt the game is less so about the amount of changes in an update but moreso what those changes are. 1.11 is considered a bad update but I guarantee you that the majority of the community can’t live without shulker boxes and firework elytras. Though I also do get what your saying:)
IMO 1.10 is the most underwhelming update in the game. It deserves its constant bullying and low ranking by the community. Though it didn’t really destroy the game like 1.14’s poor performance and pretty much made villagers the grindiest mechanic in the existence in gaming. When I look at updates I tend to separate amount of features, quality of features, and cohesiveness of the new features with the old ones. Hope I explained my thinking well lol
@@justanordinaryguy6568 Very fair, you explained well. 1.14 was pretty good content-wise I personally think (though not perfect), but server performance was just awful.
@@MagmaMelon yes in terms of content alone 1.14 is easily the best update. 1.14 added fun, unique, impactful, and creative mechanics, not only that but you can easily say that 1.14 had much much more features compared to 1.13 and 1.16. Though the performance was too much. I got tired of watching mc videos having 10fps, buggy interactions, and rendering issues to the point I waited until 1.15 cause those issues were solved by then. Sorry got alittle off track there😅😅
1.16 is the best Minecraft update
-Change My Mind
1.18 has joined the chat
Honestly, 1.7 may be what I consider to be the best update. It gave us the most stable version of the game, while still delivering new biomes and features. The absolute powerhouse that 1.7.10 was gave us the best mods in this game's history.
@@NH4NO3NPK acacia and dark oak suck
@@NH4NO3NPK 100%. 1.7.10 is the best version of the game, to this day.
Still, 1.19 is better for survival, with all the new features, but the modded and pvp aspects of 1.7 are what made me fall in love. As well as the fact that it runs at 500fps on my aging system, in vanilla, and 1000+ with optimization mods
1.13
Were getting free updates to a game we paid $20 for a decade ago. Not every update will be a completely new game. Even small components over the years make the game immensely better
1.10 came after the biggest division in Minecraft history. It was lifeless and lazy, and fixed none of the problems that were killing the community. It's not the only cause, but updates like this, and 1.12, were part of the reason that the game died around this time.
I agree that not every update has to be gamechanging (see what I said about 1.20), but there's a difference between small-scale and random, useless features.
Okay one price doesn’t matter i would expect a free mobile game to rule out updates B minecraft is top 5 most played games thats a lot of 20$ that has a store and other ways of currently making money C doesn’t excuse lazy, poor timed or ignoring issues
i remember there being quite a long gap between 1.8 and 1.9, and Mojang kinda wanted the next update to take less time to release
and we were all kinda curious what it'd be called, since after 1.9 it should've been 2.0 :D
but then 1.10 did release, and Minecraft had a huge dip in popularity for a few years lmao, the update probably fueled the process
I forgot this update existed until today, so thanks for reminding me about it.
2.38K subscribers? Man, you've been growing! Needless to say, I'm pretty proud of you. With the great content you make, I'm sure you'll earn many more! It's been great to see your channel grow all this time.
He's gained 110 subscribers overnight form this video
No, you lazzy! IM THE BEST UPDATE IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!
I remember when this update came out. It was one of the first ever updates I not only noticed but also went to explore by myself. I can't describe the levels of disappointment I felt when finding out that Polar Bears did nothing, husks and strays were more of the same and the blocks were rare. The only thing that rivaled that was my reaction to bats
I kinda agree, but I can't help but like this update. Probably because it was one of the first updates that happened after I started playing Minecraft, but still. I have good memories of it
1.10 actually made me quit Minecraft for awhile.
I find it really baffling that you didn’t mention structure blocks in this video
1.10 is not the worst upate at all
Strays are free slowness arrows early game
Polar bears drop fish on death so if you by any chance run out of food you can just kill one to get fish
Husks are great for being test dummies as they dont burn in daylight unlike regular zombies and their code can be re-used to make simple custom mele hostile mobs
Structure blocks, literally they save so mutch time when making a mega build on creative and structure voids can be used to make it so that when you place a structure, it wont get buried by surrounding blocks as the structure void will replace other blocks in its place with air
Bone blocks are good if you have too mutch bonemeal in your inventory
Allowed fishing rods to pull items
Mobs refuse to walk on magma blocks so you can use them to stop mobs from entering certain parts of your base without walls
And thats not even mentioning how useful the stuff became in newer upates
awesome video, this one as well as the hermitcraft 1 were really well written and I bet your others are as well.
After watching your hermitcraft video and realising that you clearly have a lot of expertise on the topic, I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining Superflat SMP, because while the name might make it sound like some sort of challenge server with the Superflat, that actually makes very few features inaccessible and just adds a bit of an unique spin. Other than that it is very vanilla with only quality-of-life mods added and a hermitcraft-ish playstyle of shops and bases. But to be perfectly honest we don't live up to the quality of regular fun interactions and the liveliness of hermitcraft, and I feel like, if you are actually a dedicated player you could be an awesome addition on the road to getting there.
Feel free to say no if you see this, I'd much rather know that you're not interested than be ignored.
I'd rather not thanks, since my content is more information and opinion-based than actual gameplay. Thanks for the offer though, your channel looks pretty cool so keep up the good work.
Thanks for watching!
@@MagmaMelon Thx for answering so quickly and honestly, looking forward to watching more of your stuff
It changed so little that it didn't even get an announcement on the Official Minecraft Channel
"Zombie villagers are useless"
Skyblock players:
I was talking about zombie villages, not villagers, the audio just picked me up kind of badly lol :)
Wait I thought 1.11 added polar bears, what did it add?
Woodland mansions and the surrounding feature set, evokers, vexes, totems, shulker boxes, llamas, observers and some other things
Also reworked the hunger system so you can run for much longer and not have to eat every 30 seconds
1.10 didn't harm the game, therefore it's automatically not the worst update. It's probably the most lacking, but certainly not the worst. That award would have to go to 1.13
How did 1.13 harm the game?
@@Terminated_Account it made the game a lot more laggy for lower end pcs
My first time playing Minecraft was 1.10
oof
I don't like to call the frostburn update the worst update. Not even close to being the best update but a few features I liked. The problem is those features more work alongside other more developed features.
Magma blocks became more useful later in the aquatic update, wart bricks can be useful in building, bone blocks are very useful as a white Piller. Husks and Strays are great in theory, I feel like they should be linked to a structure. Perhaps a desert tomb for the husk, with a Mummy miniboss at the end.
I feel like armor trims may be carrying 1.20, but they're so good that I honestly don't mind.
It doesn't change gameplay
this is 1.10
Not 1.20
Also the netherite upgrader
@@Alimem54 The means by which you get them literally do
The best versions of Minecraft are easily - a1.2.6a, b1.7.3, 1.7.10, 1.8-1.8.9, 1.12.2 and 1.16.5. At least, those are the versions I play the most.
But It Added Polar Bears
I remember quitting minecraft when this update released, and i honestly didn't care about the game at all until 1.13
And now we have 1.20.5-1.21
It's a bit chaotic but damn it looks good
With the april fool's potato update being potentially used as a test for future mechanics such as the grapling hook and the floater, it can only look more promising
Mojang is very lazy there’s no doubt. But variety I love random things, tho I am a builder and not to fussed on function. But I appreciate functionality quite a lot. I just like pretty things to build with…
I think the mob variations were really something they should've expanded upon more. I guess drowned got added in 1.13, but other than that, biome variants aren't really something they've messed with.
Well 1.21 did expand on this by adding the bogged wich is a swamp variant of the skeleton, it has less hp, a slower fire rate and can even be sheared to get mushrooms
@@lazarpetrovic1671 I commented this before that was announced. It is pretty cool to see, especially in conjunction with a unique mob. Best of both worlds
It was a pretty "bland" update indeed, I remember how it wasn't even talked about all that much back in the days it released compared to 1.9 when it was being teased and snapshots revealed. 1.10 was I believe one of the "rushed" updates that was just tossed in to add new stuff. Though I am surprised to hear talk of this rather "bland" update considering what happened with 1.19 that update also was rather directionless and a bit themeless as well, despite being called the "Wild Update" there wasn't much involving the wild or wilderness except the new Mangrove Swamp and frogs and the fireflies which got removed and the other features were literally supposed to be part of the Caves & Cliffs Update. I'd say 1.19 was a lot more of a failure as it got people over excited and then disappointed after release, and didn't bring that much fresh content making it more like an exaggerated polishing update, 1.10 was just more or less teased and released without getting the community overjoyed and still added some new content and mobs.
Some good points! I agree that 1.19 fell down a bit in the direction department and was overhyped, but it did at least feel relevant. Compare the number of videos with "warden" in the title to the ones with "stray".
I also have an earlier video reviewing 1.19, you may want to check it out.
I feel like people nowadays throw around the term of "Mojang being lazy" way too much to the point where it is lost its meaning but I feel like 1.10 was one of the few instances where the term feels Justified. 1.10 feels like a mediocre mod made by a pre-teen except it's actual official content.
I’m sorry- zombie villagers useless? Don’t get me wrong I agree with everything else but I HAVE to point out how you probably overlooked the curing mechanic and all of its advantages.
I was talking about zombie villages, the villages which generate all abandoned. Listening back now I totally see how you heard me wrong, that was my bad on the audio.
@@MagmaMelon no no I misheard and didn’t take into consideration you could be talking about zombie villages, my apologies! I do think zombie villages have so much potential and I hope mojang will do something interesting with them some day.
2016 was 7 years ago
Yeah.
I disagree that zombie villagers are useless, I'd say they're one of the most used for mechanics
See pinned comment
Microsoft: Dont worry bud we got ya
Zombie villager were added in 1.4
Read the pinned comment :)
Nice
Were 1.10's features bad?
Probably not
Did 1.10 hinder the game?
Gameplay: No
Sales: Maybe
Tbh 1.10-1.12 were really a bad time in Minecraft, the updates were very lackluster
They should have bundled 1.10, 1.11 and 1.12 in one update
@@synckronix I wouldn't call it great, more like it's the best out of the 3 pre 1.13 and post 1.9 updates.
1.11 was a pretty great update though
1.20 doese not change the game. Nah bro I think you live in a cave. BTW, sorry to offend you.
It's fine - I don't think 1.20 really is game-changing, but not every update needs to be. My point is that the Frostburn Update was lazy, and 1.20 isn't.
@@MagmaMelon oh OK then.
Short answer: yes.
Short answer: No.
Domenica Avenue
I feel this video was just made to defend 1.20 lel.
Mayonnaise.
Is kind of gross.
Is kind of instrumental.
@@MagmaMelon any plan on making a review on 1.20?
@@canman_sucks_sub_twi Definitely, when it comes out in full. A lot of new stuff has been announced recently and I have a lot of thoughts. Watch this space!
No Patrick mayonnaise is not an instrument
1.1 ..?
While 1.10 is the weakest update for minecraft so far for most, I would have to give it to 1.12.2. 1.10 added a secret block called the structure block that made modders and those who wanted to move large builds to other worlds without world edit so much easier. This one addition I think makes it better than 1.12.2.
I like both updates because with 1.10 they added variants of the skeleton and zombie (those being the stray and husk) along with polar bears and like you said, structure blocks also added the mesa biome HOWEVER i think that 1.12 is also really good as the glazed terracota can be used to make really cool patterns wich is perfect for building just like the structure block
@Lazar Petrović The Mesa biome was added in 1.7, and the hardened clay blocks were all added in 1.6.
@@wojak6378 sorry for the mesa biome mistake, Altough i said glazed terracota and not regular hardemed terracota
1.20 is the modern day 1.10
First time seeing this guys vids, but I agree 1.10 was the lamest update yet, but, this guy seems super nit picky and super critical to the point that not much will make this guy happy about literally everything?
Disagree - it's just a critical video. In fact, the 1.20 section is a lot more optimistic than a large percentage of people are being about 1.20.
I love most updates of this game, and I love the game in general - the reason I talk about its problems so much is because I love it. Totally understand where you're coming from though.
Okay
1.10 honestly felt like left over ideas they had for the past few updates and it felt like it was an update they wanted to get out quickly after the long time it took to do 1.9
i think the problem is that they add useless mobs to the game that are only for looks thats my opinion im not sure
I'm an archaeology student and honestly I'm dreading trails and tales. Minecraft is neither embracing the excitement of tomb raider style pop culture archaeology, nor showing respect towards the reality of archaeology.
I feel like Minecraft already has fantastic archaeology elements without this update. The temples just need to be found in more biomes and have some randomness to them like dungeons do. The nether fossils are also great and I would like them to be more present in the overworld.
But this brushing up sand to find blueprints for decorative items - not even decent loot itself - is so lame. Nobody digs up ancient remains with the goal of replicating it artistically- we do it to obtain knowledge or, if you are a tomb raider, to get treasure.
It's so strange that they tried to be so careful with this and ended up being more misinformative because of it. If I dig in an archaeological deposit, I'm going to mostly find charcoal. But because Minecraft makes it seem so down to earth, people will think that pictures on pottery and gold and diamonds are the norm. At least when you have a tomb raider scenario you are establishing what most people nowadays can recognize as a fantasy.
Now for the things I am not specifically qualified to say but will say nonetheless.
When it comes to the cherry blossoms- eugh. I would personally much rather see an autumnal biome to bring diversity in leaf colours into the game, before we start with pink flowers. And then they made the wood pink, too! It feels patronisingly girl-coded, like they believe more women will play if they can make pink houses and boats.
And at the same time since there are no unnatural wood colours outside purple and cyan, it's such an outsider and can't be used alongside the naturals in a practical way. It purely exists for someone who feels like making their entire build pink, and that just segregates it even more from most male players. Imagine if we had an ebony wood. Or something more blood red. Grey like the bark of the cherry or acacia. Or an almost white wood since birch is so yellow. But no. Baby pink.
This is a really fascinating perspective, thanks so much for commenting! I'll definitely talk at length about archaeology when I make a 1.20 review video, and I think that there are both really good elements and some things that are super inaccurate and annoying. It certainly had a lot of potential as a system, and only a small part of that potential has been delved into, it feels.
Thanks again for commenting, your profession is really interesting!
@@MagmaMelon Personally I would prefer that archaeology, if added to the game, should be more ingrained in the overall system instead of an optional side quest for decor or a tedious way to get diamonds and gold. I would like to see each site contain a 'clue' that is similar to an ender pearl in that they lead you to a site the world only has one of. An ancient capital, perhaps, or a mega village, or a portal to yet another dimension. I won't even blame them if everything leads to Atlantis.
@@demo2823 The idea of one structure leading to another certainly has interesting gameplay potential. I'd be hesitant to have structures which only generate once per world, but this is definitely food for thought!
I completely agree with the pink wood. Someone suggested green azalea wood. Have they ever seen azalea IRL?
It annoys me that you automatically linked cherry wood to being feminine. Cherry blossom trees are a very real thing in nature, and their pinkness is a very real thing to them, even if for a very short time of the year. Just like how we have several naturally pink flowers in the game like tulips, peonies, petals, and (arguably), lilacs and alliums.
New wood types are an exiting addition because they give us slabs, stairs, and fences to build with as well. And, aside from blocks dyed pink such as wool, terracotta, glass, etc, there aren’t really any pink blocks in the game, unless you count granite as pink. So, finally having a pink building material that isn’t originated from dyes is a very exiting addition for many of us. I don’t see why you have to bring gender into this. A lot of us have been wanting cherry trees in the game for years.
Another thing. Minecraft wood is intentionally colored unrealistically to make it more versatile for building. The original mangrove wood color was too similar to jungle, so they made it a lot more red to make it better for building. If cherry wood was colored a lot more realistically, it may not be as “fun” to use in builds.
:3
Bro what the **** is this should I report you!?
@@canman_sucks_sub_twi ÒwÓ baka !
1.10 is apart of the nostalgia circle for me.
1.20 is the worst
How?
It adds tons more than 1.10 ever did.
I got confuse for 1.10
@magmamusen
For me the worst MC update is 1.1. Mojang literally added few minor things there.