For the Heroic Sacrifice - attacked with R2 and 'scried' a card to the bottom than drew with Heroic Sac at the end of turn. For Heroic Resolve yeah that could have been 'rolled back' just tap a resource because he had the initiative and open resources and was the first action.
And honestly, first month playing heroic sacrifice in set one, we messed up the order of triggers pretty often, because playing magic for years, similar effects usually draw you the card after the attack / when the creature dies / end of turn etc
I realize Chris didn’t take offense but JRod was off base with the questions looking to shift responsibility for the event error to the judges rather than his Dudeness. Plainly stated, his dudeness made several errors (including both the misplay and not listening/understanding the initial instructions about calling for an appeal). I would not expect or want floor judges to remind every ruling interaction can be appealed as it undermines their authority. Now, if the head judge wanted to give a general reminder between say the 4/5th round of Swiss and then before top cut began, that seems acceptable.
No I stated both sides were wrong. Dudeness started it off by not paying for Falcon then the judge was wrong by making an incorrect ruling. Nobody was in the right here. And I am not blaming anyone I was looking at ways to help both sides do better moving forward. The whole point of this was to improve things for all parties!
@@TheTabletopMisfits 100%! it's a counter-intuitive ruling (based on how other card games like mtg would handle such a thing) Good to know it's different in SWU
For the Heroic Sacrifice - attacked with R2 and 'scried' a card to the bottom than drew with Heroic Sac at the end of turn. For Heroic Resolve yeah that could have been 'rolled back' just tap a resource because he had the initiative and open resources and was the first action.
And honestly, first month playing heroic sacrifice in set one, we messed up the order of triggers pretty often, because playing magic for years, similar effects usually draw you the card after the attack / when the creature dies / end of turn etc
I realize Chris didn’t take offense but JRod was off base with the questions looking to shift responsibility for the event error to the judges rather than his Dudeness. Plainly stated, his dudeness made several errors (including both the misplay and not listening/understanding the initial instructions about calling for an appeal). I would not expect or want floor judges to remind every ruling interaction can be appealed as it undermines their authority. Now, if the head judge wanted to give a general reminder between say the 4/5th round of Swiss and then before top cut began, that seems acceptable.
No I stated both sides were wrong. Dudeness started it off by not paying for Falcon then the judge was wrong by making an incorrect ruling. Nobody was in the right here. And I am not blaming anyone I was looking at ways to help both sides do better moving forward. The whole point of this was to improve things for all parties!
Great video thank you!
Thanks for checking it out!
What is the point of rolling back Sacrifice? Same effect either way.
Because he had not paid for Falcon so Falcon should of been in hand and sac in the discard pile
@@Outmaneuver But the best board state would have been to just tap the resource.
@@TheTabletopMisfits Since Falcon is a "may" effect, b/c he didn't pay 1 he HAS to put it in his hand. He misplayed so you can't roll it back.
@@ezmacnsteeze Which is exactly the opposite of what the head judge said.
@@TheTabletopMisfits 100%! it's a counter-intuitive ruling (based on how other card games like mtg would handle such a thing)
Good to know it's different in SWU