Tudor Black Bay GMT vs Rolex GMT Master II. Which is the better watch?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
- This video compares some of the differences between the Tudor Black Bay GMT and the Rolex GMT Master II. While the Rolex GMT is the more refined and expensive watch, In this discussion I point out 10 areas you might prefer the Tudor Black Bay GMT.
@ARCHIELUXURY @ArchieLuxuryLivestream @OisinOMalley @theurbangentry @PaulThorpeOfficial @PaulPlutaPrestige @TimWrite @BarkandJack @bearclooneywatches4186 @showcasewatches3465 @ID-Guy @NicoLeonard @NicoLeonardUncut @Crmjewelers @mikeandjoshofficial @wornandwound @BrittPearceWatches @JenniElle @alpham @JosecZuniga @TeaandTickers @gentlemansgazette @thehorologyhangout @MarcoFerranteWatches @BruceWilliams @RandomRobReviews @JohnPWatches @FedericoTalksWatches @WatchCrunchOfficial @BensWatchClub @TheoandHarris @watchsymposium @hodinkee @GQVideos @RealMenRealStyle @thewatchidiot @islandwatch
The BB GMT is an excellent watch. Buying a Tudor gets you 95% of the watch buying a Rolex would at 1/4th of the price. No brainer.
Just as durable, just as accurate, more affordable, low burglary target, as much of a compliment getter, will last forever, family legacy gift 🎁 piece. 👍 awesome video, thanks for the information.
🙏🏻 man
I actually have the same issue with brand perception of Rolex.
Also now that people are figuring out how to customize 5-link on a Tudor GMT, I’m more inclined for this watch
Do I love my Tudor GMT? Yes. Would I rather have the Rolex? Yes.
The 48 click bezel also lets you adjust to time zones of 30min increments, like India, for instance
Great video! I own both the tudor GMT & the BLRO. Both great watches, I find i wear the tudor 90% of the time and if it gets banged up I don't care.
Nothing wrong with a high end GMT and a discount GMT to take some of the damage. I do the same with my Rolex Explorer II sometimes.
Amazing review I am sold on getting the Tudor. Thank you.
Excellent vid Burbs!!! I think for many of thhe reasons that you prefer your Tudor, I prefer my Preceramic 1675. Now that would be an interesting match I
1675 would win, the Tudor is the cheaper alternative.
The point about using the bezel for timing is a good one! Also, I think that bi-directional timing makes more sense for everyday use vs the uni-directional bezels.
Great video. Have the bb gmt since released in 2018 & completely agree with you also have a Rolex 16700 which I hardly wear now Fabulous watch and great content.
Thank you 🙏🏻 Wills Meg!
Nice video Burbinghard. Just got my Tudor BB Pepsi GMT on Saturday after a 7 month wait. Enjoying it so much already.
Congratulations, wear it in good health.
Can you tell what was the price for you in your country with discount?
@@jakubgozdzikowski9767 no discount on Tudor BB Pepsi GMT right now. Waitlisted at best. Full retail. $4850 CDN
@@jakubgozdzikowski9767 I purchased it secondhand, full set, like new (4.5 year warranty left) from a private party for about 15% off retail. I also avoided the 10% sales tax rate, so I saved about 25% in total.
@@jakubgozdzikowski9767 $3,400 Used
The Tudor GMT is an outstanding watch. It dresses up or down. Quality is significantly higher than my 2006 Sub.
Pair the Tudor with an IWC Mark XVIII and you have a great pair for all occasions.
Hey dude! I liked your video. But I do have to say you mention a lot of numbers. When you bombard the audience with numbers, it can be overwhelming. Maybe it would help if you put the numbers in bullet point on screen or something. I really like the Tudor watches on the Uncle Seiko bracelets!
Thanks for the feedback. I will probably invest in better editing software to do this
Cool review but let’s be honest here. There’s no way Tudor would be known without Rolex. To compare them and actually think the Tudor is better than the Rolex is a foolish statement. Tudor is a great watch for its features, price and association with Rolex.
I own both & prefer the Tudors. Rolex feel a bit soulless once you’ve had them for a few years. I prefer my black bays over my green dial submariner too. Tudor today are doing what Rolex used to do.
Love the content man! I had no idea you had a channel. Let’s get you to 1K
Well said! Great critique of both timepieces
Thanks 🙏🏻 Matt!
Hi! What is that for a bracelet 🤔🧐?
An Uncle Straps aftermarket bracelet.
Overall, The Tudor is a better watch.
I got both. The quality of steel is much better with the Rolex, and I do like the ceramic bezel more. Rolex GMT is also slimmer which fits better in business shirt sleeves. Nevertheless, the Tudor GMT is now my "beater watch", great value and you got so much with such a reasonable price.
Excellent. You are 1st blogger to have mentioned the awkward 24 clicks of the newest rolex gmt's which eliminate the timing advantage of a 60 clicks bezel which the old pre-ceramic gmt's used to have ! this is one reason I have always preferred the submariner no date as the best overall sport watch available rather than a GMT. 48 clicks is slightly better but the thickness of the Tudor is a turn off .
Completely agree with you. My no-date submariner would probably be my one and done if I had to sell every other piece in the collection. All time greatest design.
You dont really need 60 clicks on a gmt, dive watch yeah
@@MarkDanger777 don’t get me wrong. I think the ideal tool watch would have a 4th GMT hand and a timing bezel in a compact size.
Please help and put both the Tudor GMT next to a Rolex GMT, both watches shown from the side, so we can see the difference in their thickness.
Most Tudor GMT owners complain is that it is too thick.
The Rolex GMT is 12mm thick, while the Tudor GMT is 14.6mm. So the Tudor GMT is 2.6mm thicker than a Rolex GMT.
Thanks.
Update:
Just found what I was looking for here at the 6 minute mark:
ruclips.net/video/Yw8F14Vz0zk/видео.html
The Tudor is much thicker, and I wonder how uncomfortable it maybe for its wearers?
The Tudor is an excellent watch, however it is no GMT 2. There is a reason for the price disparity (retail). The GMT 2 is just better in every way. From materials, movement, resale etc....I would buy the GMT 2 over the Tudor if it could be had at retail. I would also buy the Tudor for travel and enjoy it very much.
"The Rolex is the original true GMT wrist watch?" 1953 Glycine airman beat Rolex by a year. Just saying. Dirty nasty flippers, right on. Love my Tudor GMT. All great watches but the Rolex AD vs flippers problem seems fixed to me.
Try them both, and you will find the Rolex just fits better overall. The Tudor is pretty, but awkward in almost every dimension. Yes, I used to own one.
I do agree the Rolex fits me better personally. I have discussed it with larger wristed collectors who find the GMT Master II a little on the small side.
Ok good video but please try ur best to rehearse Off camera and deliver the content more fluently. I'm not sure but to me it seems like you're reading off something However the video is still well put together
Good comparison: Did you mention the Rolex steel 904L costs 2x as much to manufacture than 316L? 316L can be purchased with watches for $350. U.S. Most reviewers fail to mention this.
I should have mentioned that 316 steel is harder (Rockwell rating) than 904!
… but less resistant to corrosion!
So much denial in this comment section 😢
Great content but scripted reading is not the best format
Very good advertising 👏👏👏
Rolex use steel 904L / Tudor use steel 316L
looks the info about the steels difference and you know what is better…
Speak about movement, water resistant, silicon spring balance, bracelet, power reserve and bracelet, not only about steel quality.
Nah. Tudor watches can’t compete with the GMT or any other Rolex model. I’d go omega before Tudor.
I like Omega as a brand more as well. I wish then had better GMTs though.
Only 1 way it’s better. It’s cheaper.