No the 2 phone were together. When he passed where they pitched her phone on side of road. Probably to keep her from calling for help. Phone did no light up means he didn't touch it.
@@forpetessake3532 there is a point in time during trial that the evidence is overwhelming clear and convincing that the defend is guilty as sin and this is a case that is clear Murdaugh is GUILTY! Jurors are told to us ether common sense and commons sense shows his guilt.
@@GwdEquip The clothes A.M. was wearing in the tree video were never located. A.M. voice has been identified on the kennel video which is 5 minutes or so before Paul was killed. A.M. was there at the kennels 5 minutes before the murder(s). He is guilty .
I'm not sure the lawyers could have presented this information to the jury in a more complicated manner. That makes me think neither side wants the jury to truly understand the timing and what coincided with what. It needs to be clearly charted on a timeline and when it comes time for the jury to deliberate, I'd be asking for that.
That's because this is made-up nonsense that is not meant to be taken seriously. Apple acknowledges variance of 30 to 40%. This is a marketing gimmick, not something you use in a g*ddamn courtroom. There is no amount of reliable or replicable accuracy to this information. Does anybody know how to use a scientific process? two identical phones (complete with identical bumps and scratches, calibration and tachometers that are mechanically identical from the same factory?!) on two people of identical shape, size, heart rate, and historical self reported physical health data??? Did we discuss or diagram the fact that stride and margin of effort is going to be taking into account the person's height based on their health profile that they have chosen the sync from elsewhere. This is a farce? Each one of these gentlemen "phone experts" should be extremely embarrassed to have gone into a courtroom and testified UNDER OATH to that which they know nothing about. If you can't take the information off of a server, and prove that it came from that phone using the IMEI and ICCID from the carrier along with data legally from both, in addition to a third party they can back up they ever saw him with that phone in his hand that day, all you have is a bunch of conjecture from a device that he happens to own.
By this time I think the jury is suffering from technology overload. Especially the DNA presentation, that was way too much for any layperson to understand.
The education level of South Carolinians is not a disqualifying factor for serving on a jury. There are 12 jury members with a variety of education levels, technology familiarization and backgrounds. Obviously State and defense lawyers would be wise to keep the technology discussions simple and understandable. In this trial this has not altogether been achieved. To your point, information overload can often be a tactic to turn the jury off and precondition them to just ignore complicated facts and complicated logic streams. This was most probably achieved during the prosecutions voluminous presentations of financial date unrelated to WHO murdered the family. One important factor of overloading and diversionary information occurred in this case when the Judge allowed all of that financial stuff about AM being a thief, liar and unsavory character to come in. The poor jury had to sit days through the State's presentations to prove AM was a thief and a liar with no linkage to who murdered the family. I doubt the jury is really comprehending and assimilating the importance of the second by second "Time Line" discussions we are seeing here. We may never know who really killed this family.
@@verniece2 Yes, that's correct. There would up come the questions if she was able to get her phone according to her wounds, pain and shock. And if there was enough time between the first shots and 3rd etc.
I’ve never been shot but have been in a situation where I thought I was going to be shot guns where present. I was caught off guard. You don’t have time to or even think about videoing your killer. You’re more worried about defending yourself or escaping. Fight or flight and I assure you a cell phone is the last thing on a persons mind. Until the threat is gone or situation is under control. Thats when the phone becomes the tool you reach for, to call for help. But in her case she was caught off guard. They snuck up and shot Paul first, then gunned her down. The first gun shot to Paul, buck shot through the chest/head would be all it took. I bet Maggie never flinched, because of firearms always being around. Probably thought Paul shot at a wild animal or playing around. Then she got gunned down.
I'm so confused as to why the defense is calling witnesses that wind up sounding like they're witnessing for the prosecution. Lol. I mean....I am here for it....and ok with it....but I just don't understand why...
I question why there wasn't any phone data on Paul's phone when Alex said it fell out of Paul's pocket and he picked it up like there was with Maggie's phone. (screen on/off activity)
What about movement of Maggie’s phone when Alex supposedly was carrying it back to the house? Why no data on that? Why no data on her phone when Alex was driving to see his mom? If Alex grabbed Maggie’s phone it would have shown step count to at least the vehicle he drove back to the house.
The case against Alex was difficult, if not impossible. They have no defense, really, other than he LIED, LEFT, RIGHT and CENTER but he didn't kill his family. Plus, the case was TOO TECHNICAL for those OLD SCHOOL PEN and PAPER lawyers.
You can't object and argue every little point. It puts the jury off and makes it look like you have no valid points or legitimate alibi and all you have is to attack the other side all day.
To help the jury put all this off and on and backlight And portrait And Landscape And steps, and calls from Alex, etc. IN CONTEXT -they should have put in a visual as well as comparing the same information side by side with Alex' in a graph.
That is what they did with the Tammy moorer Sidney moorer disappearance of Heather Elvis in South Carolina. THEY PROVED they were literally hunting her and they got 30 years on circumstantial data alone.. Considering the judge and lawyers were GOOD OLE BOYS, it was refreshing.
Micah seems like a yes man for the state prosecution...He either couldn't remember or I believe he never seen or read the documents and information the state prosecutor was asking him about and refering him to, and had to litterly tell Micah the answers. Very scary that the state would put someone in prision for life for murders, they don't have solid evidence, only their assumptions on.....VERY SCARY...This trial is an illustration of just how unethical, unprofessional, biased and disorganized our legal system in our country is....Look at the expense the state has gone to prosecute this case on circumstantial evidence...I believe they needed to show how the murders were not related to the people involved in the deaths of the young man who Paul supposedly hit with something driving a car and the girl from the boat accident when Paul was driving drunk and hit the bridge throwing the girl out of the boat killing her....
I agree 💯 with your comment. The tax payers of South Carolina's $$ was completely wasted by the Prosecution because they dropped the ball early on when it came to collecting & preserving evidence. More ppl should take notice of the actions SLED took, misinforming / lying to the Grand Jury & leaking false blood splatter information. It's disgusting that they just excuse their lack of evidence due to laziness & blaming that grown men & women of SLED felt too intimidated by Alex to do their job. A new documentary in RUclips by Eric Allen came out recently that shows the entire truth that happened the night of the boat accident. I had read the depositions the boat accident kids did shortly after the accident & a lot of truth in favor of Paul came out. It is very interesting how everything automatically blamed on Alex & it's clear from the accidents reports etc that Paul had a good chance of being not guilty. Also, all of the kids on the boat that night participated willingly, also had too much to drink, purchased their own alcohol & preplanned to take the boat to the party to avoid the cops who were checking cars that night to catch drunk drivers. Not blaming anyone as it was clearly an accident but all parties on the boat were negligent to get back in the boat under the circumstances,when leaving the party. May Mallory, Maggie, Paul, Steven & Gloria rest in peace.
Sounds like Alex could not unlock Maggie's phone. So he threw it on the side of the road, thinking it would never be found. He forgot about the tracking capabilities.
If a test was done with the sentence thirty or fourty times the hopefully unbiased person listening might get confused or actually heard what was said. Your mind might be confused. Just like eye exams. You show two images enough times,might confuse what is seen or heard.
So Maggie’s phone would have to light up when it was tossed 9:07. He said Alex was driving by it at that time ? Then he goes back and says he’s in drive way at that time.
I watched mr.Sturgis interview. Also read the words on the screen. I don't know if a computer was typing or a person was typing. Whatever was heard,didn't always agree with what was said.lots of misinterpreted words. I wonder why it was never put to a computer or person to interpret "I did him so bayd" OR "They did him so bad".in the accents, ah did him so bayd. " thay did him so bayd"
Was Maggie at the kennels when A.M. shot Paul and then she tried to run away, or was she in another location and came to the kennels after she heard the shot that killed Paul? How did the tire marks get on Maggie's leg?
THAT IS SOMETHING THAT BOTHERS ME...I DID NOT HEAR HOW SHE GOT TIRE MAKRS ON HER LEG. CAN SOMEONE TELL ME??DID I MISS THAT PART, BUT HOW?? CAN SOMEONE TELL ME??
He just said that moving a phone can turn on the light. I shut my phone 's screen off so the light goes off, move my Android phone all over the place it did not turn on by it's self!
I would like to see a simple timeline of murdaugh events. I though maggie and paul were killed round time murdaugh stealing was being uncovered but that is incorrect. the smallest details are so over represented yet do the jury understand life events in order so that they may have an acurate timeline and therefore work out scenarios
On June 7th, AM was questioned about $792,000. that was missing. He got a call regarding his father taking him back to the hospital. On the 10th of June, a hearing requesting a list of all the bank accounts that AM and MM had, which would have exposed the fake Forge account at Bank of America.
yeah im trying to find recaps about the timeline and cant even find a decent video about it. people spend too much time talking about stuff that happened months prior to the shooting. its overwhelming.
2 Kings 17:15 "They rejected his decrees and the covenant he had made with their ancestors and the statutes he had warned them to keep. They followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless. They imitated the nations around them although the LORD had ordered them, “Do not do as they do.”
there's a connection here and i could be reaching but i have no idea why anyone would take Maggies phone and dispose of it where they did unless you wanted to check it or confuse police on time of death. Now Alex murdaugh insists that he moves Pauls body and touches his phone were there similar orientation changes on his phone and were Alex murdaugh fingerprints on it? With Maggies phone were there fingerprints on hers and if not could the orientations of her phone after her TOD be consistent with the killer cleaning off their fingerprints and then dumping the phone???
Why? They were victims too. He stole $10 million from them starting as long ago as 2006 and you can see the pain of the betrayal in their eyes. Most of them will be paying for his crimes for years to come.
Why is he speaking of each test he took than just his license he received by taking the actual course in itself 😆 like a nurse just say ur licensed as a nurse not each course & test u took to pass the class 😆
He’s talking about his specialized training which would make him further qualified to be an “expert” in this case. Much like a nurse who would be called to testify in a child abuse case would mention his/her specialized or continuing education in spotting the signs of abuse.
this trial seems to want a history lesson of each expert. i just skip the first 15 minutes. there are so much unnecessary questions that add nothing to the trial. i feel bad for the jury who have to sit thru this.
@@cerebrumexcrement I know me too. I just want to go to the cross. I haven’t gotten to there yet but I’m headed that way. He’s reading all about the phone Orientation and rotation. Lord have mercy.
Paul and Maggie shot each other. I think Paul’s second shot was suicide.Alex is implicated in a cover up but might not be one who pulled triggers. 2 different guns two different people but both family members
Has the theory been considered that Alex may have had the second gun around his shoulder with a shoulder strap of sorts? So when he used the one on Paul, he quickly flung the other around to shoot Maggie? He knew Maggie wouldn't be fast to escape.
This is where Alex's story falls apart. He was there when Paul and Maggie died. His phone proves that.
SO WHAT ARE ALEX'S LAWYERS HAVE 🤔 TO SAY ABOUT THAT!!?
@@FLOWER-rl7nh that's part of defense so no they were not together ever.
@@FLOWER-rl7nh your not paying attention.
No the 2 phone were together. When he passed where they pitched her phone on side of road. Probably to keep her from calling for help. Phone did no light up means he didn't touch it.
SIS CROOK, 😞 SORRY, BUT YOU DO...SO TELL ME!!!
All of our phones are like mini black boxes
Haha look at ole Alex learning of all the ways he f****d up! So many ways.
The defense attorneys are trying to drag us down AM's rabbit hole🤥---but I ain't going with them!
NEITHER AM I!!!
because you had your mind made up BEFORE trial started - Jurors supposed to keep open minds till all evidence is in
Defense is doing a excellent job in the eye of the small minded public.
@@forpetessake3532 there is a point in time during trial that the evidence is overwhelming clear and convincing that the defend is guilty as sin and this is a case that is clear Murdaugh is GUILTY! Jurors are told to us ether common sense and commons sense shows his guilt.
Soon as Alex didn't give up his clothes and was at the kennel,the gig was up,its a wrap folks #GUILTY
When did that happen?
@@GwdEquip The clothes A.M. was wearing in the tree video were never located. A.M. voice has been identified on the kennel video which is 5 minutes or so before Paul was killed. A.M. was there at the kennels 5 minutes before the murder(s). He is guilty .
The police didn’t ask for the tree video clothes according to the Prosecutor’s witness
I'm not sure the lawyers could have presented this information to the jury in a more complicated manner. That makes me think neither side wants the jury to truly understand the timing and what coincided with what. It needs to be clearly charted on a timeline and when it comes time for the jury to deliberate, I'd be asking for that.
omg im confused as fucc just following this trial.
Exactly
..@@cerebrumexcrement
Agreed!!!
That's because this is made-up nonsense that is not meant to be taken seriously. Apple acknowledges variance of 30 to 40%. This is a marketing gimmick, not something you use in a g*ddamn courtroom. There is no amount of reliable or replicable accuracy to this information. Does anybody know how to use a scientific process? two identical phones (complete with identical bumps and scratches, calibration and tachometers that are mechanically identical from the same factory?!) on two people of identical shape, size, heart rate, and historical self reported physical health data??? Did we discuss or diagram the fact that stride and margin of effort is going to be taking into account the person's height based on their health profile that they have chosen the sync from elsewhere. This is a farce? Each one of these gentlemen "phone experts" should be extremely embarrassed to have gone into a courtroom and testified UNDER OATH to that which they know nothing about. If you can't take the information off of a server, and prove that it came from that phone using the IMEI and ICCID from the carrier along with data legally from both, in addition to a third party they can back up they ever saw him with that phone in his hand that day, all you have is a bunch of conjecture from a device that he happens to own.
Micah Sturgis has such a calm chill presentation. Also loving that he looks and sounds like he could be related to Thomas Lennon (Reno 911).
By this time I think the jury is suffering from technology overload. Especially the DNA presentation, that was way too much for any layperson to understand.
Yes way to word this mess..technology overload...
The education level of South Carolinians is not a disqualifying factor for serving on a jury. There are 12 jury members with a variety of education levels, technology familiarization and backgrounds. Obviously State and defense lawyers would be wise to keep the technology discussions simple and understandable. In this trial this has not altogether been achieved. To your point, information overload can often be a tactic to turn the jury off and precondition them to just ignore complicated facts and complicated logic streams. This was most probably achieved during the prosecutions voluminous presentations of financial date unrelated to WHO murdered the family. One important factor of overloading and diversionary information occurred in this case when the Judge allowed all of that financial stuff about AM being a thief, liar and unsavory character to come in. The poor jury had to sit days through the State's presentations to prove AM was a thief and a liar with no linkage to who murdered the family. I doubt the jury is really comprehending and assimilating the importance of the second by second "Time Line" discussions we are seeing here. We may never know who really killed this family.
Could Maggie Murdaugh herself have been the one that turned the camera on in some sort of futile attempt to photograph her killer by any chance guys??
I think not, according to forensic medicine, the penultimate shot was immediately fatal.
@@m.h.9755I heard them say the first two shots weren't fatal
@@verniece2 Yes, that's correct. There would up come the questions if she was able to get her phone according to her wounds, pain and shock. And if there was enough time between the first shots and 3rd etc.
@Verniece Heard same in testimony.
I’ve never been shot but have been in a situation where I thought I was going to be shot guns where present. I was caught off guard. You don’t have time to or even think about videoing your killer. You’re more worried about defending yourself or escaping. Fight or flight and I assure you a cell phone is the last thing on a persons mind. Until the threat is gone or situation is under control. Thats when the phone becomes the tool you reach for, to call for help. But in her case she was caught off guard. They snuck up and shot Paul first, then gunned her down. The first gun shot to Paul, buck shot through the chest/head would be all it took. I bet Maggie never flinched, because of firearms always being around. Probably thought Paul shot at a wild animal or playing around. Then she got gunned down.
I'm so confused as to why the defense is calling witnesses that wind up sounding like they're witnessing for the prosecution. Lol. I mean....I am here for it....and ok with it....but I just don't understand why...
I’m wondering the same thing!!
Because his defense attorneys are dumb! And even dumber if they let Murdaugh testify!
My phone goes off quite frequently when a call comes in then locks up and I have to reset it.
Wow where was all this high-tech information data stuff with all the other murders that have happened in the past
The witnesses have higher education than these lawyers 😂
Alex takes notes like he is the attorney at someone else,s trial.😮
South Carolina NEEDS a 🎤
And I think the witness stand could be better. The witnesses look so uncomfortable.
I question why there wasn't any phone data on Paul's phone when Alex said it fell out of Paul's pocket and he picked it up like there was with Maggie's phone. (screen on/off activity)
That would’ve been a great freaking question for the prosecution to ask!!
Bc Paul's was locked and he knew how to unlock Maggie's?
I’m not positive, but I thought I heard somewhere that his phone had went dead…
@@loribeth3238 yes he had 2% battery left
THAT IS THE REASON THEY DID THIS, TO PROVE WHAT THE TRUTH IS !
Who's paying for these highly educated professionals' testimonies!!! 🤔 Hmm
Defense
@@vickieparry3168 Alex rainy day stash
This is super interesting
What about movement of Maggie’s phone when Alex supposedly was carrying it back to the house? Why no data on that? Why no data on her phone when Alex was driving to see his mom? If Alex grabbed Maggie’s phone it would have shown step count to at least the vehicle he drove back to the house.
They did talk about her phone showing steps after supposed murder happened
@@kaylabryson1932 Those steps were from an Apple Health app and have not been proven to be recorded after death.
The 🤳 is a big ? that remains unanswered.
If I was charged with murder I WOULD NOT WANT ALEX MURDAUGH’S ATTORNEYS. They are not argumentative towards the prosecution, from the beginning!
They are not good!
The case against Alex was difficult, if not impossible. They have no defense, really, other than he LIED, LEFT, RIGHT and CENTER but he didn't kill his family. Plus, the case was TOO TECHNICAL for those OLD SCHOOL PEN and PAPER lawyers.
@@aroukapenn very true
You can't object and argue every little point. It puts the jury off and makes it look like you have no valid points or legitimate alibi and all you have is to attack the other side all day.
@@terry_____1408 very very true
So how far is it from the driveway to where Maggie's phone was when it was tossed
To help the jury put all this off and on and backlight And portrait And Landscape And steps, and calls from Alex, etc. IN CONTEXT -they should have put in a visual as well as comparing the same information side by side with Alex' in a graph.
Totally agree 👍
That is what they did with the Tammy moorer Sidney moorer disappearance of Heather Elvis in South Carolina. THEY PROVED they were literally hunting her and they got 30 years on circumstantial data alone..
Considering the judge and lawyers were GOOD OLE BOYS, it was refreshing.
He threw maggies phone into the atv
What if the sims (not sure about spelling) is removed? Can they still retrieve information? I don’t think I’ve heard that mentioned.
Yes. The only user info stored on a SIM card is maybe some contacts. Everything is stored on the phone itself.
Micah seems like a yes man for the state prosecution...He either couldn't remember or I believe he never seen or read the documents and information the state prosecutor was asking him about and refering him to, and had to litterly tell Micah the answers. Very scary that the state would put someone in prision for life for murders, they don't have solid evidence, only their assumptions on.....VERY SCARY...This trial is an illustration of just how unethical, unprofessional, biased and disorganized our legal system in our country is....Look at the expense the state has gone to prosecute this case on circumstantial evidence...I believe they needed to show how the murders were not related to the people involved in the deaths of the young man who Paul supposedly hit with something driving a car and the girl from the boat accident when Paul was driving drunk and hit the bridge throwing the girl out of the boat killing her....
I agree 💯 with your comment. The tax payers of South Carolina's $$ was completely wasted by the Prosecution because they dropped the ball early on when it came to collecting & preserving evidence. More ppl should take notice of the actions SLED took, misinforming / lying to the Grand Jury & leaking false blood splatter information. It's disgusting that they just excuse their lack of evidence due to laziness & blaming that grown men & women of SLED felt too intimidated by Alex to do their job. A new documentary in RUclips by Eric Allen came out recently that shows the entire truth that happened the night of the boat accident. I had read the depositions the boat accident kids did shortly after the accident & a lot of truth in favor of Paul came out. It is very interesting how everything automatically blamed on Alex & it's clear from the accidents reports etc that Paul had a good chance of being not guilty. Also, all of the kids on the boat that night participated willingly, also had too much to drink, purchased their own alcohol & preplanned to take the boat to the party to avoid the cops who were checking cars that night to catch drunk drivers. Not blaming anyone as it was clearly an accident but all parties on the boat were negligent to get back in the boat under the circumstances,when leaving the party. May Mallory, Maggie, Paul, Steven & Gloria rest in peace.
It's funny that the guy who lost the data on Maggie's phone is questioning the actual phone expert.
Sounds like Alex could not unlock Maggie's phone. So he threw it on the side of the road, thinking it would never be found. He forgot about the tracking capabilities.
VERY COMPELLING
In fact I have to tap the front of my phone or push by side button to get my screen to turn on the light.
So Far the prosecution has not proven its case.
Moving..depend on signal?
I wonder if the shot to her wrist had anything to do with her trying to turn her camera on her phone? Just a thought?
If a test was done with the sentence thirty or fourty times the hopefully unbiased person listening might get confused or actually heard what was said. Your mind might be confused. Just like eye exams. You show two images enough times,might confuse what is seen or heard.
Thankyou
So Maggie’s phone would have to light up when it was tossed 9:07. He said Alex was driving by it at that time ? Then he goes back and says he’s in drive way at that time.
I watched mr.Sturgis interview. Also read the words on the screen. I don't know if a computer was typing or a person was typing. Whatever was heard,didn't always agree with what was said.lots of misinterpreted words. I wonder why it was never put to a computer or person to interpret "I did him so bayd" OR "They did him so bad".in the accents, ah did him so bayd. " thay did him so bayd"
The backlight goes off during a call until you pull it away from your face. That is what the proximity sensor is for, is this real???!
Say Alec was driving by her phone, at that time showed his steps. He was driving ? So how do you get over 200 steps?
What does it say that Alex took 1100 steps while waiting for EMS? Didn"t just sit in vehicle and make a couple of calls.
Was Maggie at the kennels when A.M. shot Paul and then she tried to run away, or was she in another location and came to the kennels after she heard the shot that killed Paul? How did the tire marks get on Maggie's leg?
THAT IS SOMETHING THAT BOTHERS ME...I DID NOT HEAR HOW SHE GOT TIRE MAKRS ON HER LEG. CAN SOMEONE TELL ME??DID I MISS THAT PART, BUT HOW?? CAN SOMEONE TELL ME??
@@FLOWER-rl7nh Ikr. I don't understand why the State Prosecutor isn't asking questions about the tire marks.
He just said that moving a phone can turn on the light. I shut my phone 's screen off so the light goes off, move my Android phone all over the place it did not turn on by it's self!
This is an iPhone theyre talking about not an android...
I would like to see a simple timeline of murdaugh events. I though maggie and paul were killed round time murdaugh stealing was being uncovered but that is incorrect. the smallest details are so over represented yet do the jury understand life events in order so that they may have an acurate timeline and therefore work out scenarios
On June 7th, AM was questioned about $792,000. that was missing. He got a call regarding his father taking him back to the hospital. On the 10th of June, a hearing requesting a list of all the bank accounts that AM and MM had, which would have exposed the fake Forge account at Bank of America.
@@richdenisevangessel1999 thank you. so helpful and making sense now!!!
yeah im trying to find recaps about the timeline and cant even find a decent video about it. people spend too much time talking about stuff that happened months prior to the shooting. its overwhelming.
2 Kings 17:15 "They rejected his decrees and the covenant he had made with their ancestors and the statutes he had warned them to keep. They followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless. They imitated the nations around them although the LORD had ordered them, “Do not do as they do.”
there's a connection here and i could be reaching but i have no idea why anyone would take Maggies phone and dispose of it where they did unless you wanted to check it or confuse police on time of death. Now Alex murdaugh insists that he moves Pauls body and touches his phone were there similar orientation changes on his phone and were Alex murdaugh fingerprints on it? With Maggies phone were there fingerprints on hers and if not could the orientations of her phone after her TOD be consistent with the killer cleaning off their fingerprints and then dumping the phone???
All this complicated info will baffle the jury
He should admit what he did, and put an end to this saga. He won't though.
Ohhhh hey…. How YOU doin’ sir 🫠🫣 he is FIIIIINE! I wonder if he’s single, I happen to live in Charlotte too😂
He has SECRETS. Looks straight laced but …
@@teresadragstream8648 hahaha that’s true, he does have a very mysterious vibe about him!
@@redfoot84 yesssss so freaking sexy 😍😰🙌🏼
K Turby-there are unproven allegation that he murdered his previous two wives
@@malikahmad8170 WHAT!? This phone expert guy??
I'd like to remind everybody that Maggie's phone was locked when they found it and they had to get her password and code to unlock it.
Lawyer walking around is talking too fast. Slow down. Quit trying to be cute in the courtroom.
Fine woven copper bag. I've the fabric..it can be so fine.
I want all the attorney's that were at the firm with Alec and every person at that firm to be at fault along with the 🐀 that are showing up today.
I bet you do! Did y’all not make enough off the Netflix documentary?
By the way, you made this account 3 months ago. Guess just to troll this case.
Why? They were victims too. He stole $10 million from them starting as long ago as 2006 and you can see the pain of the betrayal in their eyes. Most of them will be paying for his crimes for years to come.
Very distinctive pronunciations? ?
This defense attorney is extremely boring!!!!
seems to me if he wanted to get rid of her phone …..
A. do a better job tossing it - or-
B. smash it -- but that data gona still be there regardless
These guys are professional testifies earning about $7-10,000 an hour!!! They practice confusing juries.
You way over the hourly rate!
He says his fee is $600 an hr in court. He was there an hour. He got $600 that day.
NOPE! LOL!
Why is he speaking of each test he took than just his license he received by taking the actual course in itself 😆 like a nurse just say ur licensed as a nurse not each course & test u took to pass the class 😆
The prosecution asked a woman why her name was spelled differently than most?!?!?! You point a finger there are 3 pointing back at you.
He’s talking about his specialized training which would make him further qualified to be an “expert” in this case.
Much like a nurse who would be called to testify in a child abuse case would mention his/her specialized or continuing education in spotting the signs of abuse.
this trial seems to want a history lesson of each expert. i just skip the first 15 minutes. there are so much unnecessary questions that add nothing to the trial. i feel bad for the jury who have to sit thru this.
@@cerebrumexcrement I know me too. I just want to go to the cross. I haven’t gotten to there yet but I’m headed that way. He’s reading all about the phone Orientation and rotation. Lord have mercy.
Its required so there is no questions of expert testimony. It has to be read on the record
Who is the lady in pink
I wanna know
Harpootlian's assistant.
Smug Guy! Wanted his five minutes of fame and here he is. Pings do not lie, On Star does not lie. Smoke and mirrors here.
I wish we didn't have to hear his life history and could go into what he thinks about this case.
He has to prove his credentials.
Paul and Maggie shot each other. I think Paul’s second shot was suicide.Alex is implicated in a cover up but might not be one who pulled triggers. 2 different guns two different people but both family members
so they hid the guns after they killed each other?
That's a very foolish and unrealistic thought.
1st suicide in history where the weapon is not next to the body after someone blows their head off, must be a magic gun
@@laurenherda2415 Maybe Alex hid the guns to get the inssurance rewards - LOL
Has the theory been considered that Alex may have had the second gun around his shoulder with a shoulder strap of sorts? So when he used the one on Paul, he quickly flung the other around to shoot Maggie? He knew Maggie wouldn't be fast to escape.