Fuji menu system is more on customization, it took me awhile to be familiarize with the settings, once you do everything will make sense. Both cameras have different iso , sony is clearly brighter at least based in this video, I think all cameras are different. Great comparison, you make high quality videos too. You sir deserve more subscribers.
I agree the customization of the Fuji is super cool, the more I used it the more I liked it, too bad I only rented it to check it out but I'm thinking of buying one... Thanks!
Yeah that would be a powerful combo package! especially for the money, The only thing that I would struggle with would be the lack of any image stabilization, with the 6400 not having IBIS and I don't think either of those sigma lenses have Image stabilization? But you still could get some awesome footage with those.
@@brianbassett5468 for me, I would use a gimbal most of the time. Tho I'm anyway waiting to see what second gen cameras are gonna come out at 2020. Canon, Sony, fuji and Nikon let's gooo
The rolling shutter was so bad on a6300 almost unusable for panning. Xt3 is so much better. Sigma is very sharp and equal to Fuji lens in my humble opinion. But there is a catch. It lacks microcontrast due to high optical element count .
Not much lol. The bit rate out of the fuji is amazing, a little taxing on your editing machine but it is super nice to have that extra information to play with in grading your footage if your into that.
Awesome video! Im going with the XT3 over a6400 and the biggest reason is that it can record 10bit internally and upto 400Mbps bitrates. Im not saying everyone needs those specs but for someone who might do a lot of color grading the option is there if needed. You can always pick a lower bitrate if you need smaller files. But the option of 10bit color and high bitrates beats the a6400 for me. And via hdmi it can record 10bit 4:4:2 which is not an option on the a6400. Infact XT3 is the only APS-C camera in the market that can record 10 bit internally after GH5(micro 4/3rd).
Same here. But, unfortunately, most people will look at videos on their phones. So, sometimes I ask myself if our search for perfection and better quality makes sense. Plus, RUclips compresses the hell out of your videos, if you are no-name like me with couple of subscribers. This world sucks...
The 16-35 gmaster beats the 18-55 fuji kit hands down. Im surprised though with the xt3s performance. Im an xt3 user as well, but maybe for comparison, it would be better if the 16-55 2.8 was used. I think that could pretty much match the gmaster in terms of output.
Mmm, the x-t3 just just got more lattitude when editing and the video settings are more customizable. The dials are just a must for editing video, easy to change, pity about a lack of IS, but the evf being so darn good on the x-t3 just makes the x-t3 100% for a hybrid shooter. Also the 10 bit internal 420 4k/60p and 10 bit 422 4k/60p HDMI is just the bomb! Thanks for the comparison, brilliant!
When you refer to these cameras as "B- Roll Cameras" do you mean they are not good enough as a "main camera" Your footage looks outstanding and compared to more expensive models really cant see the difference, of course, im a viewer, not a camera expert.
B-roll footage and the term can mean and be used in many different ways.. However your main footage "A" and B roll can even be shot on the same camera. B Roll for many RUclipsrs and or film makers can allot of the time be shot on a better camera for a better quality. Regardless you can shoot your b roll on any camera 📷 cell phone, high end cinema camera etc.. For my type of film making I primarily use a smaller 2nd camera to shoot my b roll.. B roll is any footage shot that is kind of secondary to your main footage, b roll helps you tell your story better.. Example of B roll in this video was when I was talking about the fujifilm camera out in the snow and trees and as I was talking about the controls of the camera I put some B-roll over the top of the main footage to show the details of the camera controls up close.
Can you edit the video ? Or is the a6400 shooting itself like that ? And you shoot it with a lens or video monitor with the Sony a6400 and just shoot it ! Looking foward to you reply !
The X T3 is a far better camera. The screen, handling, the EVF and the 4K 60 fps and the video options tell you that. Fuji colour science is in a class by itself and will save you time editing. It's simply an experience like no other camera in my opinion. I'll be posting samples on my RUclips channel in the near future.
Great review! Choosing a camera is giving me analysis-paralysis. In your video, I much preferred the Fuji daylight footage, while I think the Sony edged it out on low-light footage. I'm leaning towards the Fuji myself. Question for you - I wanted to confirm that you shot all this hand-held? The fuji footage looks remarkably smooth for a camera with no IBIS.
I know what you mean! There are so many good options and there all better in different ways. Yes this was all shot hand held. The image stabilization in that kit lens works fairly well, plus shooting in 60fps or higher and adding warp stabilizer in post works pretty good. In the shots that there is no camera movement at all I put them on a tripod in like 2 clips.
I’m an 6400 owner and the Fuji has so much detail in its footage and doesn’t look over sharpened. There was so much detail in the water unlike the a6400
@@cj64films Yes it has a cool look and feel to the camera.. I just struggle switching back and forth with camera brands trying to remember how to use them, I can always remember the main settings it's just the little tweaks that I struggle with finding 😂 But it is cool to play around with other brands..
@@brianbassett5468 I don’t mind owning a couple brands tbh. I’d just love 10bit footage and great codecs. I know Sony won’t give that anytime soon with APSC
Why is every review based on B-Roll or Vlogging? I'm in a spot right now deciding between the Fuji X-T2 (crazy price drop) Sony A6400 and Lumix G9. It's just so hard to choose. G9 sucks in low light, Fuji is great for photo, Sony and Fuji look great for video but so does the G9 🤷🏻♂️ Really like the Fuji lenses
I agree, it seems hard to find a review that doesn't treat it as a vloggers tool. remember the days when a camera was built to capture other people than yourself? :D good times
If you're vlogging the Sony will be better. Better eye tracking, AF, and flip up screen. Just buy a Sony 35MM 1.8 lens with OSS and you will be fine. No record limit, no overheating, never have to worry about the camera not focusing on your face when you're walking. Fujifilm XT models aren't really the best for vlogging.
XT3 is 10bit internal so you can totally grade it hard in post without getting banding and other artifacts. The Sony is only 8bit so it should not be graded more than a tiny bit, and the Sony has heavy rolling shutter in pans and it cannot really be shot in LOG because the 8 bit doesn't have enough info to be graded. Those are really the main things.
The Sony 4k detail is WAY better and this is what people buys the camera for, not 1080p (which at 120p is bad for BOTH). The night shots are WAY better on the Sony with Fuji mushy details on the trees for example where the Sony is a lot more detailed. As much as I wanted 4k60p, I am not going to sacrifice the impact of 4K detail for it and the Fuji just cannot compare.
It's super sharp and the coolest thing is the file size because it's a relatively lower bitrate the file size is fairly reasonable compared to the Canon and Fuji 4k files take up so much space on your hard drive and seem to be more taxing on your computer/editing software compared to the Sony files
So, so close. As a Sony user, I'd still agree with your caveats, however for me, I would say - certainly looking at your night footage - the rolling shutter on the Fuji seems pretty horrible in comparison.Yes? No?
Brian, I love where you shoot your videos, the location is beautiful and your videos are always straight to the point! We just recently got the XT3 and I'm loving pretty much everything about it!
Thanks for the feedback! Nice, I really enjoyed renting the xt3 love the camera, I'm still kinda a canon fan but I really like the xt3. I might have to pick one up.
How does the autofocus compare in slow motion? I know the Sony 120fps slow motion isn't as good as 4k but I wonder how Sony's slow motion autofocus compares to the Fuji's slow motion. (I primarily shoot slow motion so don't really care about the 4k autofocus :) :) ANY FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED thank you very much.
That's a good question and unfortunately I would not be the best to answer, because I only rented these cameras to test them out and I used manual focus for almost every shot in this entire video and all shots in 120fps were done in manual focus with focus peaking set to red so I could see what I had in focus.
I am in the same boat, trying to pick between the two, I did a comparison video on my channel too - ruclips.net/video/IH0cxa_Anyk/видео.html . Which one did you end up keeping ?
I think one of the major differences between the two cameras that never got mentioned here is that the Fuji can film in 10 bit internally whereas the Sony can only do 8 bit. This is why the Sony footage starts falling apart sooner when you're pushing a heavy grade. I agree with you that the Sony looks sharper at 4k, but as a matter of personal preference I like the slightly soft look of the Fuji because it's a bit more cinematic in feel.
Yes I completely agree with you on everything you mentioned. In my mind I was aware of the higher bit rate of the fuji and forgot to mention it. There is just something about the Xt3 that I really like the look, both really are great cameras and I also feel my inexperience with Sony picture profiles didn't do the a6400 justice, a more experienced Sony shooter could have gotten a better look, but it was kinda fair because I had never even picked up a Fuji camera before this video.
@ant billionz If you're not using an ND filter and polarizer while filming outside, even stopping down won't help, regardless of camera brand. The Fuji was never meant to be an ideal vlogging camera, especially without a flip around LCD. But as for looking like smog, no modern camera from a reputable manufacture in the $1000+ price range is that bad. If you're having problems it's most likely because your exposure settings are incorrect. You're either on auto ISO or auto SS and not properly lighting the shot. I can't stress this enough, but with modern cameras, 99.9% of what ruins a shot is not what's inside the camera, but what's behind it.
@@shaolin95 When things are overly sharp in a image, it get the "digital" look a lot of people talk about. When grading, a lot of colorists will actually turn down midtone detail in order to add a bit of softness to the image. This is also the same reason why in portraiture, photographers use fast lens, so that then the eye is in focus, the skin is ever so slightly softened. And yes, people actually pay money to add "film grain" into their projects, not saying I agree with them, but there was definitely a few shots in the Mandalorian where you can tell they added or kept noise in in order to simulate grain.
@ant billionz Now I know you're full of it. Neither of these can even shoot RAW video, they are nowhere near cinema camera quality. For that, you'd need something like the S1H or 1DX III.
It could've been better if you compared the price equally, the a6400 is $900 body only and the xt-3 is $1100 body only, rather than comparing it with fuji and its kit lens ($1700) and the sony a6400 with a zeiss lens ($2000). There are people who watch comparisons like this who considers budget and wants to see if the added $200 will be worth it for them. But all in all, an informative video.
Sony colors are a lot better for me. Went with with A6600 with the Sony 16-55mm f2.8 and Sigma 16mm f1.4 lens. Lovin’s this setup. The Fuji menus are hard to get used to in my opinion.
@@kingsamvisuals isn't he expressing what he thinks? You're like all Fuji fanboys getting salty when you don't hear what you want to hear. Color btw is personal preference.
I have to ask about xt3 files. I got started with the A6000 in 2014 for a trip to India and picked up the A6500 used ($600) for larger buffer and video a year ago. Mostly animals and travel..However, playing with video, got into color correction..Davinci color space transform made slog less scary..but the the thought of files with less stretched data is pulling me.
M getting xt3 with kit lens one year warranty 900usd...what you thing should i get the the a6400 insted ....i just start traveling and dont wnt to spend move and i am in india..so wsnt to explore the hills side of the india like kashmir and all
A few things with this review, the a6400 can shoot in 4k 30fps, so I'm not sure why the 4k 24fps mode was used. Also the layout of this video was odd.. lowlight footage for the Xt3 was shown and a conclusion about it being better than the a6400 was reached before low light of the a6400 was even shown. These two points display a pretty strong reviewer bias toward the Xt3. Lots of features were left out as well, so this review could use some work. Just offering some constructive criticism.
Loved the footage in the countryside, especially from the XT3. I really your editing work too, I hope I can learn to make my videos look half as nice as yours someday. I noticed the Sony night footage looked a lot sharper than the Fuji and wondering if the lens gave it an advantage?
Thanks! Yes I noticed that to, I think it was a combination of a sharper lens and I may have just been more accurate with the focus, I did both cameras in manual focus mode and I really think that I just did a better job with the focusing..
Brian Bassett I have Sony a6000 with some good glasses, maybe I would like a better color science like for the a6400, higher frame rate but, but... I deal with, next year I will take a6100 or a6400 but will never forget the a6000 as I forget my a37 when I get the a6000
ant billionz but the audience of the fuji still growing... But I have seen a video this week on RUclips about the fuji and in the comments many "pro" told that they use fuji for family, Sony, Canon and nikon for work. Since I started question my self. So am understanding... Sorry for my English
@@peterwallin1710 Very true! And I did not get to play with the picture profiles really at all, I only rented these cameras for 3 days and believe that I had the sony set to cine 2 with auto white balance, and the Xt3 was set to Eterna and auto white balance also.
@@ma7moud_907 I agree it's a hard question. I think Fuji try to make the best APS-C camera possible, Sony focus more energy on full frame cameras. If you never plan to use full frame, I think Fuji is a better choice, otherwise Sony is a better choice so you can reuse lenses.
I've watched this video sooo many times. This might be the hardest decision I ever had to make... the 4k looks sharper in the a6400 but the xt3 looks better elsewhere. I'll most mostly be shooting music videos. I'm stuck....
Yes I agree the fuji is a much more cinematic soft feel with a film like color profile and the sony a6400 has a more true to life feel, very beautiful and sharp in 4k it really comes down to the look your going for.. The xt3 feels more like a movie and the a6400 feels like a high quality travel show type feel.. Both are great just depends on the mood your trying to create with the video.
Totally depends on what type of video your making, if you are making a more cinematic video like this one then the b-roll would be the shots that are of the trees, river, night shots etc. And the A roll is me talking. I mostly shoot B roll at 60fps or 120fps so both the Fuji xt3 and sony a6400 are great for that.. However b-roll can be shot with any camera/phone/go pro etc at any frame rate B roll is any supplemental footage that is used to help tell the story or explain things better visually.
A tripod (for static shots) Camera strap (for some of the pans) Rode mic (for recording water etc) However most everything was just the camera handheld.
DAMN YOU, SONY! They released the 6600 and still no 4k 60fps! Not even speaking of 10 bit and sh... I feel betrayed. I want to keep my Sigma / Sony lenses, cause they are so good, and wish to UPGRADE from my 6300... BUT WHERE SHOULD I GO??? To the camera with SAME VIDEO QUALITY and OPTIONS??? GREEDY, MFCK(/&$%&//%S!
Fuji menu system is more on customization, it took me awhile to be familiarize with the settings, once you do everything will make sense. Both cameras have different iso , sony is clearly brighter at least based in this video, I think all cameras are different. Great comparison, you make high quality videos too. You sir deserve more subscribers.
I agree the customization of the Fuji is super cool, the more I used it the more I liked it, too bad I only rented it to check it out but I'm thinking of buying one... Thanks!
You can buy a6400 + sigma 56 f1.4 + sigma 16mm f1.4 for the amount of xt3 with kit lens.
Yeah that would be a powerful combo package! especially for the money, The only thing that I would struggle with would be the lack of any image stabilization, with the 6400 not having IBIS and I don't think either of those sigma lenses have Image stabilization? But you still could get some awesome footage with those.
@@brianbassett5468 for me, I would use a gimbal most of the time. Tho I'm anyway waiting to see what second gen cameras are gonna come out at 2020. Canon, Sony, fuji and Nikon let's gooo
@@aight365 Yeah hopefully they will add some good IBIS the GH5 is really the only camera with good IBIS.
Still can't beat the 10bit hevc from xt3. And Sony slog is an 8bit mess which made me switch from a6300 to xt3. You get what you pay for.
The rolling shutter was so bad on a6300 almost unusable for panning. Xt3 is so much better. Sigma is very sharp and equal to Fuji lens in my humble opinion. But there is a catch. It lacks microcontrast due to high optical element count .
I love fujifilm xt3 footage because this camera have more dynamic range than sony a6400
What about 400mbs/s on the fuji vs 100mb/s on the 6400? 10bits on the fuji vs 8bits on sony ? What's "pretty much the same" in that?
Not much lol. The bit rate out of the fuji is amazing, a little taxing on your editing machine but it is super nice to have that extra information to play with in grading your footage if your into that.
XT3 looks better than a6400 but we need to keep in mind that XT3 cost almost twice the price...
I cant speak English he is voice so cool! I can understand you! Thx for video i am going to buy xt3 😂
Thank You! Enjoy the X-T3
Awesome video! Im going with the XT3 over a6400 and the biggest reason is that it can record 10bit internally and upto 400Mbps bitrates. Im not saying everyone needs those specs but for someone who might do a lot of color grading the option is there if needed. You can always pick a lower bitrate if you need smaller files. But the option of 10bit color and high bitrates beats the a6400 for me. And via hdmi it can record 10bit 4:4:2 which is not an option on the a6400. Infact XT3 is the only APS-C camera in the market that can record 10 bit internally after GH5(micro 4/3rd).
Enjoy the Fuji! It's a great camera.
And Panasonic g9
I'm watching this on a 1440p monitor and you could really tell the detail of the 4K vs the 1080p :) Awesome comparisons!
Yes you really can see the difference on a larger screen compared to a phone screen, the 4k will look much better.
Same here.
But, unfortunately, most people will look at videos on their phones.
So, sometimes I ask myself if our search for perfection and better quality makes sense.
Plus, RUclips compresses the hell out of your videos, if you are no-name like me with couple of subscribers.
This world sucks...
To be fair, most of A6xxx sony's cam have crappy 1080 since they focus on their 4K based on 6K, so of course you'll see a massive difference ^^
@@malekith13 it’s no crappy it’s soft , if you increase the sharpness the 1080p xavcs will be on par with 4k .
I love fujifilm xt3
The 16-35 gmaster beats the 18-55 fuji kit hands down. Im surprised though with the xt3s performance. Im an xt3 user as well, but maybe for comparison, it would be better if the 16-55 2.8 was used. I think that could pretty much match the gmaster in terms of output.
Mmm, the x-t3 just just got more lattitude when editing and the video settings are more customizable. The dials are just a must for editing video, easy to change, pity about a lack of IS, but the evf being so darn good on the x-t3 just makes the x-t3 100% for a hybrid shooter. Also the 10 bit internal 420 4k/60p and 10 bit 422 4k/60p HDMI is just the bomb! Thanks for the comparison, brilliant!
Yikes, those 1080 clips from the Sony look terrible compared to the 4K.
Totally especially the 1080 at 120fps
yep, and the one and only way to fix that is to shoot 4k and downscale to 1080
When he said "The menu system on the Fuji xt3 is kinda lame" had me dying of laughter for some reason 😂
X-T3 FTW.
Nice I think so too!
Great review, but it'd help if you titled the camera on display during video.
can you make a video fujifilm xt3 with external recording vs internal recording. how much external recording increases the quality of footage.
That's a good Idea, I will put that down on the list for sure..
Best camera is Fuji X-H1. But sony have SIGMA glass and this beats fuji.
I really would like to check out the XH1 sometime, maybe I will have to rent one
oh god the A6400 does not look great at all in my opinion, not even comparable.
-blind person
4K looks sharper on the Sony, in all the clips. The 1080p looks like a joke though, Fuji's much better there.
I usually think the Fuji looks better but in this video the Sony seems like better video. Nice vid
Thanks, I like them both in different ways 🙃🙂
When you refer to these cameras as "B- Roll Cameras" do you mean they are not good enough as a "main camera" Your footage looks outstanding and compared to more expensive models really cant see the difference, of course, im a viewer, not a camera expert.
B-roll footage and the term can mean and be used in many different ways.. However your main footage "A" and B roll can even be shot on the same camera. B Roll for many RUclipsrs and or film makers can allot of the time be shot on a better camera for a better quality. Regardless you can shoot your b roll on any camera 📷 cell phone, high end cinema camera etc.. For my type of film making I primarily use a smaller 2nd camera to shoot my b roll.. B roll is any footage shot that is kind of secondary to your main footage, b roll helps you tell your story better.. Example of B roll in this video was when I was talking about the fujifilm camera out in the snow and trees and as I was talking about the controls of the camera I put some B-roll over the top of the main footage to show the details of the camera controls up close.
Xt3 not even close
Can you edit the video ? Or is the a6400 shooting itself like that ? And you shoot it with a lens or video monitor with the Sony a6400 and just shoot it ! Looking foward to you reply !
I did do some minor color grading in Adobe Premier, did not use a monitor just the camera.
Thanks !!!!
The X T3 is a far better camera. The screen, handling, the EVF and the 4K 60 fps and the video options tell you that. Fuji colour science is in a class by itself and will save you time editing. It's simply an experience like no other camera in my opinion. I'll be posting samples on my RUclips channel in the near future.
Its a pretty dang good powerhouse especially for the money! Dollar for dollar I think it's one of the best cameras for image quality out there.
I shoWed a few people this video and they liked the Sony better. They don’t know anything about specs, just what they like.
@ant billionz lol you should go back to school bud, you really don't know what you're talking about
Great review! Choosing a camera is giving me analysis-paralysis. In your video, I much preferred the Fuji daylight footage, while I think the Sony edged it out on low-light footage. I'm leaning towards the Fuji myself. Question for you - I wanted to confirm that you shot all this hand-held? The fuji footage looks remarkably smooth for a camera with no IBIS.
I know what you mean! There are so many good options and there all better in different ways. Yes this was all shot hand held. The image stabilization in that kit lens works fairly well, plus shooting in 60fps or higher and adding warp stabilizer in post works pretty good. In the shots that there is no camera movement at all I put them on a tripod in like 2 clips.
Xt3 film look amazing
Nice videos bro
You deserve more views 👍👍👍👍
Thanks! Planning some new videos soon..
kamera apa yang anda gunakan untuk merekap video didalam ini?
I’m an 6400 owner and the Fuji has so much detail in its footage and doesn’t look over sharpened. There was so much detail in the water unlike the a6400
The more I use my XT3 the more I really like it, something about the image just looks really good 👍🏻
@@brianbassett5468 Definitely!! I don’t think Id sell my a6400 but I’d love to buy the XT3 just to give Fuji a shot
@@cj64films Yes it has a cool look and feel to the camera.. I just struggle switching back and forth with camera brands trying to remember how to use them, I can always remember the main settings it's just the little tweaks that I struggle with finding 😂 But it is cool to play around with other brands..
@@brianbassett5468 lol yeah I understand. I dabbled with blackmagic and loved the image quality but I didn’t like having a big cumbersome rig
@@brianbassett5468 I don’t mind owning a couple brands tbh. I’d just love 10bit footage and great codecs. I know Sony won’t give that anytime soon with APSC
why is even your 60p footage so choppy at times?
cus the sony has a major rolling shutter issue unfortunately
Why is every review based on B-Roll or Vlogging?
I'm in a spot right now deciding between the Fuji X-T2 (crazy price drop) Sony A6400 and Lumix G9. It's just so hard to choose. G9 sucks in low light, Fuji is great for photo, Sony and Fuji look great for video but so does the G9 🤷🏻♂️ Really like the Fuji lenses
I agree, it seems hard to find a review that doesn't treat it as a vloggers tool. remember the days when a camera was built to capture other people than yourself? :D good times
If you're vlogging the Sony will be better. Better eye tracking, AF, and flip up screen. Just buy a Sony 35MM 1.8 lens with OSS and you will be fine. No record limit, no overheating, never have to worry about the camera not focusing on your face when you're walking. Fujifilm XT models aren't really the best for vlogging.
@@newzinski6946 What do u think would be better for videography? Cinematic videos, music videos, short ads etc
XT3 is 10bit internal so you can totally grade it hard in post without getting banding and other artifacts. The Sony is only 8bit so it should not be graded more than a tiny bit, and the Sony has heavy rolling shutter in pans and it cannot really be shot in LOG because the 8 bit doesn't have enough info to be graded. Those are really the main things.
Very true, the bit rate from the XT3 is pretty killer..The file size is really taxing on the PC though.
@@brianbassett5468 thats what you get for better quality though, larger file sizes. The fuji was the obvious winner here.
600th like! I still have to make my mind as the X-T3 costs almost twice that of the A6400 with the bundled lens
Fuji xt3 beat Sony camera
You never spoke of rolling shorter .
And the xt3 image quality is just outstanding...great video Sir.
Thanks!
Great Job, Great Review !!! But why I found you now? I just subscribed.
I'm glad you found me, thanks for subscribing!
The Sony 4k detail is WAY better and this is what people buys the camera for, not 1080p (which at 120p is bad for BOTH). The night shots are WAY better on the Sony with Fuji mushy details on the trees for example where the Sony is a lot more detailed. As much as I wanted 4k60p, I am not going to sacrifice the impact of 4K detail for it and the Fuji just cannot compare.
Thank u for this input. Seems like im leaning more towards buying sony :)
Please compare it with the A6600 and Sigma 16mm @ 1.4f....that is much more competitive..
That would be a sweet combo, I will have to see if I can get my hands on one.
For me it is the Sony a6400, the 4K sharpness just rocks (on my 33 inch screen).
It's super sharp and the coolest thing is the file size because it's a relatively lower bitrate the file size is fairly reasonable compared to the Canon and Fuji 4k files take up so much space on your hard drive and seem to be more taxing on your computer/editing software compared to the Sony files
So, so close. As a Sony user, I'd still agree with your caveats, however for me, I would say - certainly looking at your night footage - the rolling shutter on the Fuji seems pretty horrible in comparison.Yes? No?
Want to know this too! Seems A6400 is better in low-light but other than that the XT3 is better? Hmm
@@carrofilms do you see what I mean about the rolling shutter on the Fuji though? That is putting me off.
The sony a6400 can shoot 4k 30fps. Why did you use 24fps?
xs10fuji vs xt3 fuji vs a6400 sony for video hoping you can make a review for this. thank you
Brian, I love where you shoot your videos, the location is beautiful and your videos are always straight to the point! We just recently got the XT3 and I'm loving pretty much everything about it!
Thanks for the feedback! Nice, I really enjoyed renting the xt3 love the camera, I'm still kinda a canon fan but I really like the xt3. I might have to pick one up.
@@brianbassett5468 We just got an XT30 as well for a b cam. No 60 FPS but it will just be a static cam anyway or second angle for interviews!
@@DakotaJ666 Nice! What lenses do you like for those cameras?
@@brianbassett5468 I only have one Fuji lens and it's the 16mm f1.4 but I also use the Fringer adapter with Canon glass.
Way cool, sorry to bug you, but I'm curious how well does that adapter work out?
not technical
how do you have stabilized the cam? only. with your Hands? where it is better the stabilization?
Dude your production quality is insane. Wish you kept posting content.
More to come!
How does the autofocus compare in slow motion?
I know the Sony 120fps slow motion isn't as good as 4k but I wonder how Sony's slow motion autofocus compares to the Fuji's slow motion. (I primarily shoot slow motion so don't really care about the 4k autofocus :) :)
ANY FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED thank you very much.
That's a good question and unfortunately I would not be the best to answer, because I only rented these cameras to test them out and I used manual focus for almost every shot in this entire video and all shots in 120fps were done in manual focus with focus peaking set to red so I could see what I had in focus.
I still can't decide...
I'm with ya I really like them both for different reasons but both are great!
I am in the same boat, trying to pick between the two, I did a comparison video on my channel too - ruclips.net/video/IH0cxa_Anyk/видео.html . Which one did you end up keeping ?
el 1080 de la a6400 deja mucho que desear, bajo mi punto de vista.
Thank you extremely helpful
Glad it helped
I think one of the major differences between the two cameras that never got mentioned here is that the Fuji can film in 10 bit internally whereas the Sony can only do 8 bit. This is why the Sony footage starts falling apart sooner when you're pushing a heavy grade. I agree with you that the Sony looks sharper at 4k, but as a matter of personal preference I like the slightly soft look of the Fuji because it's a bit more cinematic in feel.
Yes I completely agree with you on everything you mentioned. In my mind I was aware of the higher bit rate of the fuji and forgot to mention it. There is just something about the Xt3 that I really like the look, both really are great cameras and I also feel my inexperience with Sony picture profiles didn't do the a6400 justice, a more experienced Sony shooter could have gotten a better look, but it was kinda fair because I had never even picked up a Fuji camera before this video.
@ant billionz If you're not using an ND filter and polarizer while filming outside, even stopping down won't help, regardless of camera brand. The Fuji was never meant to be an ideal vlogging camera, especially without a flip around LCD. But as for looking like smog, no modern camera from a reputable manufacture in the $1000+ price range is that bad. If you're having problems it's most likely because your exposure settings are incorrect. You're either on auto ISO or auto SS and not properly lighting the shot. I can't stress this enough, but with modern cameras, 99.9% of what ruins a shot is not what's inside the camera, but what's behind it.
lol more cinematic...gotta love the excuses Fuji fanboys come up with. The noise and fake iso ratings are also very cinematic...
@@shaolin95 When things are overly sharp in a image, it get the "digital" look a lot of people talk about. When grading, a lot of colorists will actually turn down midtone detail in order to add a bit of softness to the image. This is also the same reason why in portraiture, photographers use fast lens, so that then the eye is in focus, the skin is ever so slightly softened. And yes, people actually pay money to add "film grain" into their projects, not saying I agree with them, but there was definitely a few shots in the Mandalorian where you can tell they added or kept noise in in order to simulate grain.
@ant billionz Now I know you're full of it. Neither of these can even shoot RAW video, they are nowhere near cinema camera quality. For that, you'd need something like the S1H or 1DX III.
It could've been better if you compared the price equally, the a6400 is $900 body only and the xt-3 is $1100 body only, rather than comparing it with fuji and its kit lens ($1700) and the sony a6400 with a zeiss lens ($2000). There are people who watch comparisons like this who considers budget and wants to see if the added $200 will be worth it for them. But all in all, an informative video.
how about overheating issue?
Thank you so much for this. Cheers from India.
Fuji has so many colour profiles the colour situation is moot.
Just what I was looking for. Does the Fuji have the 30 minute video restriction?
Thanks! Yes it's max recording time is the 30 minutes..
@@brianbassett5468 Thanks, that's too bad, that was my attraction to the A6400 but no IBIS and unfortunately the a6600 has no pop up flash.
@@dennispeaks Pop up flash? Who the hell is in the market for these type of cams and wants a pop up flash? lmfao
@@mikeseager8768 Maybe not for you pros, I am a new to this other than point and shoot so it is best for me.
Awesome video with stellar music!
Thanks that means allot!
Very well done!!!!
Thanks!!
holy shit the 1080p is terrible
I really feel it was more my inexperience with the picture profiles of the sony that affected the color grading.
Your mic audio is superb. Great vid.
Thank you!! I actually put a lot into the audio of my videos, it's cool you noticed! BTW Keep up the great work on your channel looking great!
@@brianbassett5468 Would be great if you did a video on your setup. Its very clean
Sony colors are a lot better for me. Went with with A6600 with the Sony 16-55mm f2.8 and Sigma 16mm f1.4 lens. Lovin’s this setup. The Fuji menus are hard to get used to in my opinion.
That will be a sweet setup!
This one comment managed to oppose the whole internet. Fuji colors are amazing and Sony menus are the worst.
@@kingsamvisuals isn't he expressing what he thinks? You're like all Fuji fanboys getting salty when you don't hear what you want to hear. Color btw is personal preference.
Это без обработки?
I have to ask about xt3 files. I got started with the A6000 in 2014 for a trip to India and picked up the A6500 used ($600) for larger buffer and video a year ago. Mostly animals and travel..However, playing with video, got into color correction..Davinci color space transform made slog less scary..but the the thought of files with less stretched data is pulling me.
M getting xt3 with kit lens one year warranty 900usd...what you thing should i get the the a6400 insted ....i just start traveling and dont wnt to spend move and i am in india..so wsnt to explore the hills side of the india like kashmir and all
@@heyitslove706 did you get the xt3?
A few things with this review, the a6400 can shoot in 4k 30fps, so I'm not sure why the 4k 24fps mode was used. Also the layout of this video was odd.. lowlight footage for the Xt3 was shown and a conclusion about it being better than the a6400 was reached before low light of the a6400 was even shown. These two points display a pretty strong reviewer bias toward the Xt3.
Lots of features were left out as well, so this review could use some work. Just offering some constructive criticism.
@Braiden Reich Do you know how to speak english?
Loved the footage in the countryside, especially from the XT3. I really your editing work too, I hope I can learn to make my videos look half as nice as yours someday. I noticed the Sony night footage looked a lot sharper than the Fuji and wondering if the lens gave it an advantage?
Thanks! Yes I noticed that to, I think it was a combination of a sharper lens and I may have just been more accurate with the focus, I did both cameras in manual focus mode and I really think that I just did a better job with the focusing..
Sony needs a new product designer. Their camera looks so unattractive.
they're literally the only attractive ones to me
The problem is not the camera, so just choose a camera, a good and go out shoot.
Very true, shoot with what you like and go create stuff!
Brian Bassett I have Sony a6000 with some good glasses, maybe I would like a better color science like for the a6400, higher frame rate but, but... I deal with, next year I will take a6100 or a6400 but will never forget the a6000 as I forget my a37 when I get the a6000
ant billionz but the audience of the fuji still growing... But I have seen a video this week on RUclips about the fuji and in the comments many "pro" told that they use fuji for family, Sony, Canon and nikon for work. Since I started question my self. So am understanding... Sorry for my English
Music?
All the sound effects and music are from epidemic sound.
The quality out of the sony depends alot on what pp you use so, what pp did you use?
What do you mean by pp?
Brian Bassett sorry. PictureProfile. The same most likely goes for the Fuji 2.
@@peterwallin1710 Very true! And I did not get to play with the picture profiles really at all, I only rented these cameras for 3 days and believe that I had the sony set to cine 2 with auto white balance, and the Xt3 was set to Eterna and auto white balance also.
Brian Bassett thanks👍
I bought an X-T3 but not being able to flip the screen up to see what you’re filming in a vlog is very frustrating :(
how is the video going with you?good?,and what about photography?
@@ma7moud_907 So far very impressed with this camera!
@@DigiDriftZone iam so confused between sony a6400 and the xt3
which one is better in your opinion?
@@ma7moud_907 I agree it's a hard question. I think Fuji try to make the best APS-C camera possible, Sony focus more energy on full frame cameras. If you never plan to use full frame, I think Fuji is a better choice, otherwise Sony is a better choice so you can reuse lenses.
@@DigiDriftZone so if i want a (APS-C) camera,fuji is better right?
I've watched this video sooo many times. This might be the hardest decision I ever had to make... the 4k looks sharper in the a6400 but the xt3 looks better elsewhere. I'll most mostly be shooting music videos. I'm stuck....
Yes I agree the fuji is a much more cinematic soft feel with a film like color profile and the sony a6400 has a more true to life feel, very beautiful and sharp in 4k it really comes down to the look your going for.. The xt3 feels more like a movie and the a6400 feels like a high quality travel show type feel.. Both are great just depends on the mood your trying to create with the video.
I've been searching for different reviews and your review is the Best ..AAA+++ love the detail of each image and how you compared both. Loved it
Thanks!
Fuji=cinematic. Sony normal.
Great comparison video!
Can you please share with us your low light shooting setting on a6400?
How it is so clear and without noise?
Thanks!
Hi what's the difference between a b roll and an a roll camera?
Totally depends on what type of video your making, if you are making a more cinematic video like this one then the b-roll would be the shots that are of the trees, river, night shots etc. And the A roll is me talking. I mostly shoot B roll at 60fps or 120fps so both the Fuji xt3 and sony a6400 are great for that.. However b-roll can be shot with any camera/phone/go pro etc at any frame rate B roll is any supplemental footage that is used to help tell the story or explain things better visually.
What gear did you use to make this video? Cheers
A tripod (for static shots) Camera strap (for some of the pans) Rode mic (for recording water etc) However most everything was just the camera handheld.
DAMN YOU, SONY!
They released the 6600 and still no 4k 60fps!
Not even speaking of 10 bit and sh...
I feel betrayed.
I want to keep my Sigma / Sony lenses, cause they are so good, and wish to UPGRADE from my 6300...
BUT WHERE SHOULD I GO???
To the camera with SAME VIDEO QUALITY and OPTIONS???
GREEDY, MFCK(/&$%&//%S!
Currently debating on between the Fuji XT-4 and the Sony a6600
Both great however I would probably do the xt-4