➡Be sure and get my FREE Photography Guides: "I Bought A Nice Camera, Now What? 10 Things To Do First" and "Photography Basics: 20 Definitions You Should Know" on my website: "boorayperry.com/education/ ➡Use the code RUclips to save 50% on my guide to photographing with natural light and my guide on photographing outdoors with off-camera flash! ➡Guides and other stuff - boorayperry.com/education/ ➡Gear - boorayperry.com/boorays-gear/ ➡Instagram - wwwinstagram.com/boorayperry/ ➡Store - my-store-e02782.creator-spring.com/listing/new-camera-nerd ➡Booray Explains - tinyurl.com/3e7w8zjt
I wanted to buy a pocketable camera and LOVED the look of Sony A6700 but I can't find THIN lenses for it, do you know if that exists? Fujifilm seems to have the thinnest lenses on their camera to fit in your pocket. I'm looking for pocket sized compact mirrorless with interchangeable lens that supports a thin lens as a daily shooter, mostly full body, waist up and selfies. I like 20mm, 35mm, 85mm so being able to swap to a larger 85mm occasionally for portraits would be nice. Any camera and thin lens recommendations similar to Sony A6700? Budget $2000. PS: left eye dominant but I'm okay with right eye cams if I have to.
@@emonymph6911 The camera wouldn't be too big of a problem I would probably suggest a Fuji XT 30. The small lenses will be more difficult. You can get a pancake lens that's maybe 35 mm equivalent but anything more than that is going to be bigger.
@@BoorayPerry Thank you I put Sony A6700 Fuji XS20 & XT30 on a wish list and whichever has the best price on Black Friday is what I'll buy. I'm a bit worried about the Fuji's on my monitor they look extremely cold (very blue hue) with excessively dark colours (super dark greens like a drop of black was added) and excessively washed white on fair skinned tones but they look better on darker skin. They just feel off for some reason.
Something interesting happened I asked for my friends opinion and they sent me photos from their Nikon so I decided to view them side by side on my phone which was 100% brightness and my PC and realised the colours looked totally different so when I turned my brightness up on the monitor I realised it was 40% only, when I set both 100% they looked more similar. So after looking at Fuji footage on 100% brightness it does look better than before but it's stiller darker and less visually appealing for a happy social media mood in my opinion than the Sony colours. Just a note to others put brightness to 100% when you watch reviews.
Exactly this! I do not want to be spending that much on a camera, but I am currently in the process of learning and experimenting with ND filters, long exposures and so on, and really just got affirmed that I wanna experience what this camera has to offer. Damn it.
Such a spot on breakdown. “My daughter doesn’t want a Jeep, she wants the idea of a Jeep” X100V is that exact scenario. People want it because of the hype but don’t realize there are comparable (and better) options in the Fuji lineup lol
@@BoorayPerry Peeps who wanna buy that Fuji because of TikTok have no clue what they want. You can sell them 100$ camera in X100v case and they wouldnt see the difference. Anyone with minimum knowledge about photography will knew that its overpriced 3 times right now.
If you are among the folks that value an OVF along with an EVF, there are few cameras available with this. I have the X-100F and X-Pro2 among 4 other Fuji cameras and these 2 will never leave me.
After decades of being obsessed with photography, I finally started with an X-100F 2 years ago. Then, I thought I wanted a big upgrade and sold it. Bought an X-T5 with 3 of the best lenses you can buy for it. And after all of that, I just miss the beautiful simplicity and limitations of the X-100F. Seriously considering selling ALL my X-T5 gear just to go all the way back to a used F. I don't need to move the world with my photography...just myself.
I wanted an x100v so badly but the x-t30 felt better ergonomically and interchangeable lenses. Finally decided on the x-t20. A little older, small, light, cheap, money left for lenses, does all I need and I absolutely adore it!
It’s really the internal film effects that people want when it comes to the x100v, you can totally bypass post processing, most people don’t actually need to be using post production software at this point where everything is automated
Your Jeep analogy is spot on Booray. It’s exactly why I sold my X100F. I loved it, it took great pix, and I didn’t use it. When I did, I really wished I had different focal length lenses. So it’s back to my X-T3. And zero regrets
Just told my husband how you rattled off its features, followed by… “if you don’t understand what I’m talking about, then you don’t need this camera.” Excellent way to bring most people back to reality. 🙌
My first Fuji was the X100. Still have it and still use it. The lens is brilliant. Never any dust on the sensor. Easy to handhold at slow shutter speeds. 35mm effective FL. Add inbuilt panorama and with the original full leather a great conversation starter and engagement with the subject. Travelled NZ and Tasmania with it. Perfect.
I got mine for $1100 B&H open box before the world lost its collective minds over this very decent camera. It's frankly a wonderful 35mm shooter. If one can accept that. I daresay newbies... will not. Personally, I already shoot a Sony A7C with a 16-28 and a 28-200, so I truly don't need the Fuji lens ecosystem (which on average skews just as expensive as Sony's, and almost as heavy -- but is premium crop glass). Those of us who have been around awhile, can appreciate the simplicity that, "I don't need to surround this Fuji with another $2500 of glass." Part of the X100's secret sauce is that there's a certain freedom and inherent limitation of the 35mm that breeds creativity and inspiration when working with it. It's a feeling you won't find when you've got a bag full of lenses that can address *every possible shooting scenario* It's a breath of fresh air and a lowered guard to realize "whatever photo I take today, the focal length is not in my control, I can frame only with my feet." It's not a camera for everyone. The gentle limitations are its genius. If you know, you know.
Thanks for very useful info. The only thing I'd like to point out is that the letter V represents the Roman numeral 5 and should be pronounced "five". "X100 five" tells the listener that the camera is the fifth version better than "X100 vee" .
I'm gonna disagree with you here. Yes, it stands for "5" but it's pronounced "V". It's the "S", "T", "F", "V".. not the "second/third/fourth/fifth. The reason they used the V is because they already used the F.
Yes but that's because no one wants to say "VI." Fuji didn't think far enough ahead. :)I have never heard anyone say they have the "2" or the "3." It's always the "S" or the "T".@@apinantpongsupaht872
• Booray starts by comparing the Fuji X100V to a Jeep, stating that just like a Jeep might not be suitable for everyone, the camera also has its limitations. • Booray suggests considering alternatives like the Fuji XT30 or the Nikon ZFC for retro-styled cameras with lower prices. • Booray also mentions the Ricoh GR3, which is pocketable and has similar film simulations. • Booray highlights that the Fuji X100V is unique in its retro-styling, fixed lens at f/2, built-in flash, leaf shutter, and 4-stop ND filter combination. • Booray emphasizes that if you're not into street photography or don't understand the camera's unique features, it might not be the right choice. • The camera's built-in flash and leaf shutter set it apart from other alternatives, making it perfect for certain photography styles. • Price can be a factor, as similar interchangeable lens cameras can get expensive with lens additions. • Booray addresses the misconception that other cameras are real alternatives to the Fuji X100V and argues that its combination of features is hard to find in other models. • Booray mentions that the lens sharpness and film simulations differ slightly from previous models but still retain the unique features. • Booray advises viewers to understand the camera's capabilities fully before deciding to buy it.
I love my x100v. The most significant selling point for me is the lens first, leaf shutter, ND filter, and size. The lens often gets overlooked. I like the sharpness at f2 it delivers.
Great video! I just want to ask what the results of the X100V or X-T30 in low light conditions. Furthermore with the option of playing with ISO button how much grain can I expect in my photos from X100V or X-T30? Thank you beforehand!
Just on your point, you could also buy an Olympus OMD-10 with retro styling for nearly half the price, and use the extra money on a great lens or two. Underrated rig, arguably best value for money out there.
I am a Canon studio photographer, but I did not want to carry all my gear around on a European holiday in July 2019. I was introduced to the X100F at the camera store, I liked the retro styling, but she had me at "it's got a leaf shutter". Back in the seventies I was a medium format wedding photographer using leaf shutter lenses, flash sync to 1/500th sec. I had to have this camera. Several things aligned and I saved around $550 on a new camera. I shot around 3000 images in those 28 days. Imagine getting a sharp image on a moving boat of the Amsterdam Harbour with a camera that small at 12 x24 inches it is fabulous. But I had frustration too, sometimes I would knock a function button, and not be able to shoot. The manual was dog eared by our journey's end. This camera is in my car kit. It goes everywhere. Camera, spare battery, 12" collapsible reflector, reflector holder with clamp, cable release, off camera flash one speedlight one trigger. I've a light stand in my car as well, but I can get studio standard images with this kit.
I want and need this camera. I've owned Fuji (X-E2 and X-Pro-2) before. Sold them because I thought I needed full-frame. Bad move. Big, heavy, clumsy, and simply does not inspire me to get out and take pictures. I prefer to shoot in full manual, and most cameras are not designed to be used that way. I also prefer the rangefinder style because it's easier to use the EVF (my preference) without smashing my nose into the LCD. The X-E4 would work, but you can't get those either. I had a Pro-2, but could never get used to its quirks, which is even worse in the Pro-3. The Leica Q3 would work, but I don't have $6K. The X-T4 would work (better than the T5) because the LCD flips around so you can use the EVF without nose prints. But, I don't like the T model's handling. So Fuji makes ONE camera that would be ideal for me under every possible circumstance, and... I can't buy one. 😞
I got the X100V for two reasons: 1. I had an X100T and loved it, and 2. I couldn't afford at the time a digital Leica M (eventually I did by trading a ton of fine analog gear towards that and was able to get me a Leica M10). Still, the X100V is unique; and as you said, there's nothing that can substitute it as an all around camera. Heads-up, you neglected to mention the digital emulation of 50mm and 75mm focal lengths, that given the superb sensor and processor, you will be hard pressed to find a difference side by side with the X-T4 fit with said lenses, unless you're shooting studio targets. Now again, having already the M10 and a 35 Summicron, the X100V is my all around camera of choice: 1. Fast; will get you three well focused images in the time the Leica takes to wake up from stand-by (forget turn on). 2. Sharp; the new formula of the Fujinon is at least as sharp as my aging 1977 Summicron (35/2) v.4, even corner to corner and, thanks to the in camera processing, without corner vignetting or distortion (the new $7000 Summicron 35 ASPHERICAL will beat that tho). 🤣 3. Stealth; the drop down screen added to the 75mm interpolation is a sniper weapon for candid street. 4. Ergonomic; everything is where it should. 5. Highly configurable to your needs; e.g. I've got the multifunction ring configured as zoom if the camera is in AF mode. 6. Does very decent close-ups. 7. Cheap; you get camera *and lens* for the price of a similar body. 8. Weather resistant; took it to Scotland last week of October. 9. Small; fits in a meager CaseLogic pouch that will also hold a compact charger plus two extra batteries, a and the "28mm" WCL. 10. Painlessly replaceable; if it gets damaged, drowned, or stolen I can replace it virtually on site. Imagine dropping your M11 from a 2nd floor! 😖 Guess I could go on but then it would be redundant, suffice that this has become my go anywhere and favorite travel companion.
Yes ... I have done the same thing. Discarded my thoughts about X100V and Picked up FUJIFILM XT30 II with XC15-45mm F3.5-5.6 OIS PZ kit lens. And using the zoom lens I'm trying to find the perfect Focal Length for Streetphotography and everyday shooting. Thank you sir.
When I went shopping for a portable high quality camera I started with the Sony rx100 / canon g5 type shooters. When the x100v was suggested I immediately rejected it. For the same price I could get an XT3 with the kit lens. As much as I like the x100v I frankly don’t see the point of paying for the equivalent of an xpro with a fixed f/2. The XT3 electronic shutter lets you shoot f/1.2 in broad daylight, if you want, and a good flash with high speed sync lets you do fill light well above the sync speed. I could still use an ND filter for certain shots, however. With the xt3 cripes I even got a charger AND the little ex-8 or whatever it’s called pop-up flash in the box! That is actually a useful little flash at closer distances, and certainly easy to throw in your pocket. I’m glad I passed on the x100v since I take at least half my photos on the 56 or 50-140 lenses at this point and I’m never looking back!
Really enjoyed the video. About a year ago. I came to this same conclusion. As just a hobbyist, I realized all I wanted was the compact vintage look and the film simulations. So instead of splurging on the 100v, I decided to get the xt10 & the 27mm pancake and I’m very happy with my decision.
A fantastic contribution to awareness. As I listen to you speak, I keep thinking, ‘If Only!’ Bigger grip, bigger battery, stable image, heat management. However, I was brought up using Leica back in the day when you were not a true professional if you didn’t show up to a news event or a wedding without a Leica. So that indefinable feel, that amazing image quality, that quiet look of a Leica just is not on any other camera. Yep, you only get that on an X100V. Oh, how I long for the X100VI.
Where most people fail when buying a camera is deciding what they want one for in the first place. If you want to learn photography, I would start with a Canon 70D, Chinese flash, and a 24 mm lens, nifty 50, and a zoom to 300 or 400. That along with the lens that comes with the camera sets you up. Add in a few ND filters and your set to start. What's the cost? You will spend about $500. from that price-point you will be happy all the way around. Did I mention that the 70D had a built in flash?
Some great tips. Sounds like you were including new cameras in the comparison which is fair. Options to be considered are the Fujifilm X-E1 or X-E2 as they are compact, have Fujifilm simulations and have a built in flash as well.
I was thinking of selling my 100v but you convinced me to keep it. I have used it as a travel and skiiing-camera and as such it has impressed me a lot giving me stunning pictures. Sometimes I have missed having an interchangeable telelens, especially when shooting lectures and events with it. I have rarely used fill flash with this camera and actually that reminds me of why I got it in the first place. Off to France in a few days and this will be the camera in my bag.
@@BoorayPerry Thank you. I noticed Fujifilm also makes a 23mm 1.4, while I understand the 23mm f2 would be the "same" lens that's mounted on the x100v, if I was getting the tx30ii, wouldn't the 23mm 1.4 be a better choice?
I went through a bunch of Fuji cameras in a few short months, lusting after an X100V but couldn't find a reasonably priced one. An X-E3, X20, X-T20, original X100, X30 & X100F, all of which had something about them that I LOVED but was missing something from one of the others. The X20 and X30 were out because of the small sensor, but the X20 made me fall in love with leaf shutters. I bought an original X100 cheap and while it is clunky to use, the form factor and built-in ND really appealed and I found myself carrying it everywhere, despite the lousy AF. I realized I needed a tilt screen after using the X-T20 and X30. The X-E3 is wonderful (I've kept it as my interchangeable lens camera) but alas, no built-in flash, and that noisy regular shutter. The X100F was nearly perfect but I couldn't seem to hold it without hitting all the buttons on the back (not a problem on my touch screen X-E3), and the "glowy" look at f2 close up on the X100 and X100F lens was annoying to work around. I finally found a reasonably priced X100V and I can honestly say I haven't picked up any other camera since. The build quality, the image quality and the experience of using it is just wonderful.
Your so Spot on built in flash is mega important for all scenario's,I was struggling to find a camera that has all the features and is still small in form factor
I couldn't afford an x100 ten years ago. So I got an x30. I would've liked to have ND filters, but the fill in flash, now that's something I wanted and enjoy. And yes, the film simulations are a big part of why I have been buying Fuji cameras since before the x30. More basic, yes, but still useful and great to have.
All statements are really valid. Same happened to me when i bought x100f. I eventually sold it after 3 years and got fuji x70 and sony rx1. I don't really need viewfinder, nd filter etc. It is really wonderfull x100 series
The best alternative is a Leica Q2. With how outrageous X100 any model pricing is, you might actually able to find a use Q2 not far off. If you're completely clueless about photography, get an E-M10 ii, GX85, GX9, E-M5 ii/iii, or even a G9 with current used pricing. Lenses and bodies are much cheaper used relatively speaking with a matured system to pick from. I use MFT as my primary work system with an EM5iii and G9 and travel around all over for photojournalism and have never had a client tell me my gear wasn't good. I've had shots chosen for work that were shot with a Q7/QS-1/MX-1, cameras with tiny sensor relatively speaking. My partner I travel with shoots with a couple Pentax KPs and gets amazing results. Never pay over MSRP for a current X100V or over a used value that's a lot less than that for older models.
I have been using the x100v for a couple of years (before it became the internets most hyped camera). The wide angle converter is a permanent fixture. I’m taking some of the best pictures I have ever taken - not because the camera is internet cool, but because it comes with me when I travel and I don’t have to spend hours in post production when I get back (for me, this is the x100v’s biggest selling point, but never gets talked about by influencers….. I guess my point is use a camera and get good at making pictures, rather than good at buying cameras
I'm appreciating my old Fuji X10 more now. Fixed Lens - Check, Built-in Flash - Check, Film Simulations - Check, Leaf Shutter - Check, Zoom Lens - Plus, Crappy Battery - Minus. I really wish the Fuji X100 series had used a fixed zoom lens instead if a fixed focal length one.
I don’t have one. I have an x100f that I’ve used for years. It replaced an x100s. The optical viewfinder with the frame lines that adjust for parallax and teleconverter setting is the feature that no other camera line has and I love. My last film camera was a Leica M7 and the x100 series is as close as I can get (and afford) to that experience. Nice video!
Thank you for pointing that out. As I always say too: Distinguish the difference between a "need" and a "want". With that said, I believe many people (including myself) who buys the X 100 series bought them out of "Want", only after they got it and shot with it, do they realize how capable and wonderful this camera is, then they grew to be in the "need" side. I for one switched from a 25-year Nikon experience to Fujifilm after my first, X100T a few years ago. I have a X100T, and X100F. No X100V, (didn't think it was worth the upgrade from F), and I'm now looking into buying the XT5.. Again, a "want" haha.......
That's a tricky decision that as a 11 years Nikon DSLR user upgrade your equipments or buying an expensive small fixed lens camera. We DSLR shooters are addicted to changing lens .
@@mohammadvarzideh780 Vary true, now I have a good collection of Nikon glass and F100, F5 from the film era, all just sitting in the cabinets... haha...
Isn't that the truth? I just hope that the people who are buying this camera because it's popular all of a sudden will find that it sparks them to want to learn more about photography so that they can truly appreciate what makes this camera unique.
Hi ! Thanks a lot for this video. My personal reason to get this camera is that I had a X100S before. I took some pictures in NYC and, at this point, I didn't have a correct screen to really see my pictures. I thought "oh, again more uninterested pictures...", and, I kept these pictures, but, not the camera. Once the camera was sold, I took a look again on these pictures with a correct screen with my computer, and said... Oh my... Now, I'm full of regrets, really sad. I want it back, because it's what I need, I know it, for the excellent reasons you explained in this video. Thanks for this.
Sent mine back after two problems, first was a lcd was changed as the screen was not able toucht mode, came back and then the write read made a lot of noises so could not use at all. Two falults was more than enough
I’m thinking of the x100f, but wheather sealing isn’t given and also no ND filter if I’m not mistaken. Do my everyday casual photos the sensor with the resolution is enough from the x100f I wouldn’t need the x100v for just that part. My Sony a7Riv is too heavy and expensive with the GM lenses to always carry it with me. I’m also happy with my EM5Mk2 but there’s still the part with the big lenses (yes a pancake would be an option) but the EM5 doesn’t have room to play for film simulations. So my best consideration is the X100F at the moment for an always on me camera. I also backed the “Flashback Camera” on Kickstarter which will be fun to use but you have to “develop” you images 24h (don’t think bad about this part, sounds stupid but this camera aims for a film style feeling although it’s digital) So long story short, would you recommend the X100F instead the X100V? 7:00
X-E4 is great! The only minus is that it has no optical viewfinder, only digital one. But the option to change lenses won me over when I was considering between buying X100V and X-E4 and I bought the last one:)
If you want the flash capability that takes advantage of the leaf shutter/ND filter etc you can still get those capabilities with your existing system. You can always buy an ND filter for your favorite lens and a strobe that supports high-speed sync. Not as convenient as the 100V but the same results can be created without buying a $2000 camera..
I am looking for a camera which feels like a manual film camera. With manual controls for aperture, shutter speed, ISO and focus. The X100 series can do this - and much more. Are there alternatives for this?
I think you might have sold me on the X100V lol I am a social dancer (Salsa, Bachata, Kizomba) I do have a Panasonic Lumix S5 Mark I that I use for my RUclips Channel. I have taken it to dance parties to take photos but I have to take my photo bag with the accessories and since it is my RUclips camera I am constantly on edge so I can not really take photos and dance. I have watched videos about the X100V and yours is the FIRST that mentions built in flash!!! The fact that the camera is compact, fixed lens AND I can use it at night means the it is as if someone designed it for me lol And you get all the capabilities for what you pay! 1399$ in the us and 1599 Euro in Europe (this includes 20% VAT Tax) I think camera manufacturers should focus on this price range. iPhones have become so good that I might NOT upgrade my iPhone and get the Fujifilm camera instead. The major reason I upgrade my iPhone is for the camera. And objectively iPhones have the best video but photo-wise there are better phones.
X-S10 I have been using the X-S10 now for about six weeks and I love this camera because it has everything that we love about Fuji but has modern tech with in body stabilisation.
Ricoh GR3 and GR3x have the built-in ND filter and the Film Sims, but I agree it doesn't have a view finder or built-in flash. Though the Ricoh has become like the X100V in one unfortunate way, availability.
Here's why: ruclips.net/video/DgHDM8tvkpU/видео.html You don't have to use the built in flash. You can use whatever flash you want. But the leaf shutter does make it so that any flash will do more.
I want to tell you my story, namely that I started photographing with Fujifilm (old cheap compact camera)and then I bought my first dslr canon d60 and 3 lenses. After 10 years I got tired of the same photos and a few years I didn't take any more pictures. Then, because of a friend, the desire for photos was ignited again But this time I wanted to do events. The coincidence made me argue with that friend who already had a Sony a74 camera and he was making me get one too. Now I'm oscillating between the xT5 and the new x100?The moral is that we are changeable and that we want something then no, but at least let's find what suits us best and I, for one, don't want to put money into lenses but to choose between ricoh gr iii s or fujifil x100.👍🥂
Your message could be “Don’t overpay for an X100v” instead of buy because nobody can buy one right now at retail. I’ve been looking for about 8 months but bought a Sony a7c instead initially. Love it but still wanted to try the Fujifilm film simulations and bought an x-e4 because I couldn’t find an x100v. I’m really enjoying it and love the fact that I can change lenses. Although by wallet would prefer a fixed lens. It doesn’t have a leaf shutter, flash or built in ND filter but the fact that it has the same sensor and has great autofocus it’s still a win. I will still buy an x100v if I can find one but I have no regrets getting the x-e4. It’s a great camera
I don't need a X100whatever ... I need an OVF camera. Unfortunately there are not many other options around. Each time I use a X-Twhaterver camera (or other brand) for a while, I again find out that I cannot live without an optical viewfinder.
I`m with Fuji since 2011, with some cameras and lenses from 10 to 400mm. But since i bought my X100V in Dec. 2020 (together with the X-S10) i only investet money on a Godox TT350. No more other investments. So it was my "cheapest" fotogear ever. I use it 90% of the time and it can do all i need on a daily basis. Btw - it`s also weather sealed. Greets from Austria (Plz excuse my english)
I’m a 66 year old who loves to learn new things. Was a Canon shooter who switched to Sony when the mirrorless evolution occurred. Just bought the x100F used. Have some travel plans. I mostly use zoom lenses so I’m not sure about the fixed 35mm. I’d love to hear more about the simulations and edit process in camera. Do you apply the simulations before shooting? Can you change a simulation after the shot is taken? Is the original photo still available after a simulation is applied? Is the simulation applied to both raw and jpeg photos? I’m assuming simulations are the same as presets in LR. How is the editing process done in camera? Always enjoy your info on YT. Thanks!!
You choose to simulation before you take your shot and it is only applied to JPEGs. The application is permanent. If you shoot in raw it is applied to the raw when you import it into Lightroom or capture one but you can change it. I tend to shoot in raw plus jpg. That way I have the simulators version ready to go immediately after I shoot it and I can transfer it to my phone and send it somewhere and I have the raw available for when I get home in case I want to change it.
My main camera is a Nikon d7500. A decently light crop factor camera system. I was still trying to figure out how to have a take anywhere camera and was seriously jonesing for one of these fujis. Based on the hype. But the price and the hype. I found an open box deal on a Lumix lx100. It has retro style. It has a decent zoom. And was priced at $450. I wrapped it in a leather half case and it looks like an old Leica. There are alternatives that don’t have all the hype. I’d love the film features of the Fuji. I’m dabbling in street photography. But I’m more of an all around photographer. A bit of street a bit of landscape. Lumix has some great compact cameras. As an alternative.
Is this a good travel camera along with street shooting? Will it really fit in the pocket? The 2024 could be the perfect camera for me. Sold my X-T1 and lenses. I want something smaller and easier to handle that is jam packed with features even for auto shooting. Thanks.
If you don't put a lens hood on it, it will fit in in a cargo pocket but not something like a pair pf jeans. It's at least twice as thick as your phone in a case. The only drawback is the lack of zoom. If you can live without that then it's the perfect travel/street camera. :)
Another classic Booray Perry video. I am so glad I stumbled upon this channel and can heartily recommend your Photobomb podcast as well to anyone out there who hasn’t caught it yet.
Right. Even used wide open at f/2, the shutter syncs with flash up to 1/1000 s even with the X100F. X100F, the precursor of the V, has not even a tillable screen and like any X100 so far no image stabilization. But still is in itself a quite complete camera. You can add lens converters, a flash, and mount filters but usually don't need to do. No backpack like when I take longer trips with my DSRLs. Just the camera, and beginning to take photos. Only thing I miss with X100F is Eterna simulation. With flash, I don't use it often, but more at daylight to fill shadows than at night to light the subject.
When i bought my fuji x100f years ago, i didn't really have any expectations. Cool camera, decent pictures, brand new tech, and expensive should keep me in check for a few years. Using a jeep for non jeep purposes whatever. The little camera just works so well and everything in it is purposely built and useful... all my nikon stuff is just collecting dust. Theres just something very releiving about adopting the fixed lens small camera lifestyle. You manage to work with it and you really don't want to go back. The funny thing is the camera is a tool. The camera tries to accomodate and work with you as best as it can; however in this instance with this camera, i feel im the one trying to accomodate as best as possible to the camera.
I have an X-t5 but I recently traded an X-t20 for the X100F and am happy with it. I liked the X-t20 but I specifically wanted a fixed lens system so my X-t5 could stay home when I was going to a party or taking a walk downtown or traveling. I had heavily considered the Xpro series but felt it silly to have two interchangeable systems with the same sensor. (not to mention the cost difference). I think the x100 series is great for people who are interested in a rangefinder style but maybe cannot afford the price of a Leica or aren't ready to upgrade to the xpro series! I also prefer film photography but the cost of film is astronomical right now and I have been missing using my canon sure shot point and shoot. The x100 line up bridges that gap for me.
I like the X-E4 with at least 2 lenses and that will cost 2500-3000$. I don't have even to buy the body. I bought Canon M50 a year+ ago and I don't like much due to weight and too much setting.
Best advice you gave was to get camera with interchangeable lens, like x-t3 or x-t2, and learn the exposure triangle with the dials on top, cuz this will teach you the craft of photography, Too many people(not just TikTokers) want instant gratification, but it requires study and practice with your Fujifilm mirrorless features to explore for a lifetime of creative enjoyment. Not a sermon, just a thought.
The YT algorithm insisted that I watch this video. Ha! I didn't expect to like the video, but I do. You've done an excellent job of explaining why someone might want the X100V. It's a Jeep! Ahahahahahaha... I bought an X100S a couple-three years ago and played with it for awhile, made some decent captures, but never really *got* the camera. So it was set aside and I moved on to other things. But, earlier this year I decided to pick up my cameras again and started walking around with the X100S. I also carried my X-T1 now and again. Then I fell down the FujiXWeekly rabbit hole and figured out one of the things that Fujifilm is all about... the simulations. I also learned that the X-T1 and X100S were "crippled" (in a sense) because they could not fully implement all those fascinating film simulations that Ritchie has curated so carefully. That got my attention. So I bought an X-T5 (already have plenty of glass) and started looking for a "reasonably" priced X100V. When one came available, I bought it. I know I overpaid. What I learned is that the X100V is a wonderful walk-around camera. It is light, handles well, and makes wonderful images, especially if using one of the film simulations *and* a light diffusion filter. These JPGs can look quite filmic, which is what I wanted. (I find the clinical sharpness almost too much for what I like to shoot.) The simplicity of a fixed-lens camera is freeing as well. Now, I learned a couple of things... or rather think about them differently now that you've done such a good job of illuminating them. I need to learn the use of fill-flash. That will be fun. And, I get the use of the ND filters now. I can't use a camera that doesn't have an optical finder of EVF. I'm outdoors too much and the screen is too hard to see, plus I have old eyes and have trouble getting my bifocal on the screen when holding the camera for a high angle. You didn't mention that the X100V is weather resistant when used with a filter. The X-E4 (and others in the X-E* series) are not. I don't know about the X-PRO line. Also, the X-E2 has a built-in (pop-up) flash. All in all, I'm very happy with the X100V. It is often my grab and go camera. It's simplicity is often the thing I like most about it, even if that limits my choice of lens the the 23mm f/2 it has. It's a very good lens. It's a very good camera. It's also a Jeep!
I don't care about the style. I've had the X100F for a few years, as my "fun" camera. I like the ND filter, the fixed lens, AP-C sensor, size, high speed flash. I have several Nikon DSLR's, but don't always want to carry large bodies and lenses. I take the X100F with me wherever I go around town. Folks don't seem to notice when I'm using, as opposed to a DSLR with immediately raises awareness. I wouldn't consider the X100V because I like the rear controls.
Well explained, and that applies to all cameras. If you need a new camera (or just want it ;-) ) you should make a list of what the camera should be able to do, what is definitely necessary, and what is useful, but not necessary. and you budget of course. For me this was (2019) compact camera, big aperture, zoom lens, at least a 1 inch sensor, raw. And slow motion film and nd filters are useful. My wish was then the Sony RX100 V, but the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX15 comes very close, and was a lot cheaper. So this one it became. Both also have a leaf shutter. the LX15 can sync with the flash to 1/4000. The Sony syncs up to 1/2000 but does have a built-in ND filter and can film up to almost 1000fps. Chose what you definitely need to have, and see what you can afford. And definitely look at the model you want to purchase. Newer does not always mean more, something regularly things can disappears. eg; the newer sony RX 100 no longer have an nd filter.
Pair the X100V with the small Fuji EFX20 flash, which can be triggered by the built in flash and flash sync upto 1/4000.... man, you now have the ultimate portable off camera flash set up! The built in flash will serve as a fill light, the EFX20 (angled around 80 degrees from the camera) will be your main light and the setting sun serves as your back light! You have an instant three light set up outdoors right there!!
I ended up going with the xpro 3 because I like changing lenses and it fit my hands better than the smaller xe4. X100v is absolutely awesome, I just think people should also look at other cameras and not think the x100v is the end all. Ask yourself this…if some tik Tok Instagram superstar didn’t mention this camera, would you be even looking at it in the first place? They’re called influencers for a reason…
Thank you for your video. Even though I own many cameras from Sony, Canon, Nikon, and Fuji since the X100 series did not support interchangeable lenses I stayed away from it. I guess I never bothered to learn about its special features of a leaf shutter, built in ND, but having a built in flash was not special because I had plenty of flash experience going back to the film days and always owned several. But after watching your video now I do want to add one to my collection even though my other half dozen digital and half dozen film cameras are full frame. From Fuji have owned X-Pro, X-E1, X-E2, and now X-E3 still, along with X-T1, X-T2, X-T3, and X-T4 so I am familiar with the film simulations I am really a RAW shooter and often using Cobalt mage software to do post camera film simulation. Thanks for showing what is unique about this little marvel. Will buy if the price ever comes back to normal but until then I will not miss a shot I need while waiting for it. Take care.
I've been photographing professionally for over 40 years. I mostly used the hasselblad and mamaya with leaf cheddar lenses And You are right If they don't understand what the camera does They should look at something else I think most people would be happy with a camera that has an interchangeable lens mount and has a simple zoom from 18-55 Or maybe one of those lenses that are 18 - 200
I especially love the "Is it everything?" section. Those questions you asked in that section are so apt, Booray! The amount of people I see asking which camera they should get and saying they want a Sony A7 III, and then saying all they will do is post on Instagram. People need to think more clearly about needs vs wants. Funny you mentioned Leica as I was actually looking for an alternative to my M10-R as a small backup kit lol. Thanks for the great video.
I think a lot of people don't realize how easy it is to get a camera that will do what you need for a pretty good price nowadays. They don't realize that the Fuji X100V costs more money because of the things it can do that only matter if you are really into photography.
I am not gonna lie here, this my Top 5 videos on RUclips and sir I understand your Greek, thank you. I’d wanna be where you are in 20 years. God bless you
Yes, I know exactly what you were talking about and that is why I purchased the X100V just after its initial release…still happy and no plans to replace at this time. Also have the super compact and “eye-candy” looking EF-X20 flash from my x100, x100s and x100T days and still use it for longer camera battery life during outings when requiring flash…this flash is not available any more and yes, wayyyy too expensive to buy used just like a used X100V is at this time.
Remember the Leica Cult back in the day? Well, my opinion is that the members of that sect just wrote FUJI on the marquee of their old church. What kind of person buys a Fuji? In my opinion, those who love to make their cameras a subject of conversation, like those Leica slingers, of yesteryear looking for a reputation. I agree that Fuji cameras are fine tools, but retro looks won't make you a great photographer. I firmly believe that Fuji cameras are dedicated to the Artisan of the image. Not for the action or the casual street shooter. Portable phones will suffice. Your exposition is clear and very well-centered. I unequivocally agree with you. Keep on sharing.
Great advice !!! My go to camera is a 1953 Kodak Retina I and IIa film rangefinder. I bought them, and did a complete teardown on both including the shutter and the Retina Ia (1a) had a sharper image than my Fuji digital cameras !! For digital I shoot a Fuji XT-1. Lo-Fi, cheap and it works for ME. my Son wants a Jeep too. I told him to get a job and save for it. 😜
I still have the original X100 I purchased in 2011, just wish I could find my battery charger for it, seems to have gone missing in a house move 😟 love the images from it
How good is performance of this camera 📸 vor vloging? I want camera which can grab entire human body fully standing up into the frame from no more than hand distance away.
Over and above all the desirable features you list, my greatest desire is for a camera that has the ability to produce absolutely pristine, sharp images.
I owned an X100F for three years, and I never used the built-in flash about four times. In those cases, I didn’t really need the fill flash, but just used it as a “can’t hurt” assist. Now, I have an X-Pro3 with multiple lenses that I love to experiment with, a camera with bigger ergonomics for my massive meaty claws, and a workflow that supports my shooting style in a much more transparent way. I’ll also note that the vast majority of X100V shooters aren’t going to use the flash syncs up to 1/4,000th. It’s nice to have, but for 97% of X100V shooters it’s certainly not a dealbreaker.
Not to mention an external flash on a monopod to shoot subjects on a bright day with rembrand light wide open. Looks like a medium format camera with a porty strobe
Yes, a flash that syncs at 1/4000s at F/2 is a big deal when most flashes will sync only at 1/250s, but you'll agree that a built in flash doesn't produce images as good as off camera flash for things like say portraits. So forgive me, maybe the inbuilt flash is not a big deal at all. It makes sense to get a different camera, put on a hot shot flash trigger and use an off camera flash that is angled at your subject - gives much better results!
I’ve owned the X100V for nearly three years, I love it. It’s my main camera.I initially purchased due to size, but I love the user interaction, and the results. There’s nothing not to like.
Fuji x70 has built in flash, leaf shutter, apsc, tilt screen, built in nd filter, and is smaller than the x100v. It just doesn’t have a viewfinder but honestly most people just use the lcd anyway. It also doesn’t focus as fast as the 100v
@@BoorayPerry that’s right but 16 is more than enough for it’s intended purpose. The tilt screen can tilt all the way forwards for selfies with your friends too, which is something the x100v cannot do.
➡Be sure and get my FREE Photography Guides: "I Bought A Nice Camera, Now What? 10 Things To Do First"
and
"Photography Basics: 20 Definitions You Should Know"
on my website: "boorayperry.com/education/
➡Use the code RUclips to save 50% on my guide to photographing with natural light and my guide on photographing outdoors with off-camera flash!
➡Guides and other stuff - boorayperry.com/education/
➡Gear - boorayperry.com/boorays-gear/
➡Instagram - wwwinstagram.com/boorayperry/
➡Store - my-store-e02782.creator-spring.com/listing/new-camera-nerd
➡Booray Explains - tinyurl.com/3e7w8zjt
I wanted to buy a pocketable camera and LOVED the look of Sony A6700 but I can't find THIN lenses for it, do you know if that exists? Fujifilm seems to have the thinnest lenses on their camera to fit in your pocket.
I'm looking for pocket sized compact mirrorless with interchangeable lens that supports a thin lens as a daily shooter, mostly full body, waist up and selfies. I like 20mm, 35mm, 85mm so being able to swap to a larger 85mm occasionally for portraits would be nice. Any camera and thin lens recommendations similar to Sony A6700? Budget $2000.
PS: left eye dominant but I'm okay with right eye cams if I have to.
@@emonymph6911 The camera wouldn't be too big of a problem I would probably suggest a Fuji XT 30. The small lenses will be more difficult. You can get a pancake lens that's maybe 35 mm equivalent but anything more than that is going to be bigger.
@@BoorayPerry Thank you I put Sony A6700 Fuji XS20 & XT30 on a wish list and whichever has the best price on Black Friday is what I'll buy.
I'm a bit worried about the Fuji's on my monitor they look extremely cold (very blue hue) with excessively dark colours (super dark greens like a drop of black was added) and excessively washed white on fair skinned tones but they look better on darker skin. They just feel off for some reason.
Something interesting happened I asked for my friends opinion and they sent me photos from their Nikon so I decided to view them side by side on my phone which was 100% brightness and my PC and realised the colours looked totally different so when I turned my brightness up on the monitor I realised it was 40% only, when I set both 100% they looked more similar. So after looking at Fuji footage on 100% brightness it does look better than before but it's stiller darker and less visually appealing for a happy social media mood in my opinion than the Sony colours. Just a note to others put brightness to 100% when you watch reviews.
came here to discourage myself from buying the camera. leaving with more urge to buy the camera.
Jedi mind trick, 😆.
Exactly this! I do not want to be spending that much on a camera, but I am currently in the process of learning and experimenting with ND filters, long exposures and so on, and really just got affirmed that I wanna experience what this camera has to offer. Damn it.
Such a spot on breakdown. “My daughter doesn’t want a Jeep, she wants the idea of a Jeep” X100V is that exact scenario. People want it because of the hype but don’t realize there are comparable (and better) options in the Fuji lineup lol
Welll... I wouldn't say "better", just different.
@@BoorayPerry Peeps who wanna buy that Fuji because of TikTok have no clue what they want. You can sell them 100$ camera in X100v case and they wouldnt see the difference. Anyone with minimum knowledge about photography will knew that its overpriced 3 times right now.
If you are among the folks that value an OVF along with an EVF, there are few cameras available with this. I have the X-100F and X-Pro2 among 4 other Fuji cameras and these 2 will never leave me.
After decades of being obsessed with photography, I finally started with an X-100F 2 years ago. Then, I thought I wanted a big upgrade and sold it. Bought an X-T5 with 3 of the best lenses you can buy for it. And after all of that, I just miss the beautiful simplicity and limitations of the X-100F. Seriously considering selling ALL my X-T5 gear just to go all the way back to a used F. I don't need to move the world with my photography...just myself.
Very well said. :)
I wanted an x100v so badly but the x-t30 felt better ergonomically and interchangeable lenses. Finally decided on the x-t20. A little older, small, light, cheap, money left for lenses, does all I need and I absolutely adore it!
Fujifilm cameras are evergreen, people should look into those older cameras more; even those X-Trans 1/2's
It’s really the internal film effects that people want when it comes to the x100v, you can totally bypass post processing, most people don’t actually need to be using post production software at this point where everything is automated
@@Princep555 is there a good alternativa for that?
I’ve had an X-T10 since 2015 and I love it. The X-T20 with the 24 megapixel sensor is a great camera.
@@herickvar8608Fujifilm X-E3, but no built-in flash.
Your Jeep analogy is spot on Booray. It’s exactly why I sold my X100F. I loved it, it took great pix, and I didn’t use it. When I did, I really wished I had different focal length lenses. So it’s back to my X-T3. And zero regrets
Just told my husband how you rattled off its features, followed by… “if you don’t understand what I’m talking about, then you don’t need this camera.” Excellent way to bring most people back to reality. 🙌
My first Fuji was the X100. Still have it and still use it. The lens is brilliant. Never any dust on the sensor. Easy to handhold at slow shutter speeds. 35mm effective FL. Add inbuilt panorama and with the original full leather a great conversation starter and engagement with the subject. Travelled NZ and Tasmania with it. Perfect.
I got mine for $1100 B&H open box before the world lost its collective minds over this very decent camera. It's frankly a wonderful 35mm shooter. If one can accept that. I daresay newbies... will not. Personally, I already shoot a Sony A7C with a 16-28 and a 28-200, so I truly don't need the Fuji lens ecosystem (which on average skews just as expensive as Sony's, and almost as heavy -- but is premium crop glass). Those of us who have been around awhile, can appreciate the simplicity that, "I don't need to surround this Fuji with another $2500 of glass."
Part of the X100's secret sauce is that there's a certain freedom and inherent limitation of the 35mm that breeds creativity and inspiration when working with it. It's a feeling you won't find when you've got a bag full of lenses that can address *every possible shooting scenario* It's a breath of fresh air and a lowered guard to realize "whatever photo I take today, the focal length is not in my control, I can frame only with my feet."
It's not a camera for everyone. The gentle limitations are its genius. If you know, you know.
Very well said my friend 📷🙂
Thanks for very useful info. The only thing I'd like to point out is that the letter V represents the Roman numeral 5 and should be pronounced "five". "X100 five" tells the listener that the camera is the fifth version better than "X100 vee" .
I'm gonna disagree with you here. Yes, it stands for "5" but it's pronounced "V". It's the "S", "T", "F", "V".. not the "second/third/fourth/fifth. The reason they used the V is because they already used the F.
@@BoorayPerry
FUJI has now released the X100VI. Everybody calls it X100-six. No one says X100-Vee-Ei.
Yes but that's because no one wants to say "VI." Fuji didn't think far enough ahead. :)I have never heard anyone say they have the "2" or the "3." It's always the "S" or the "T".@@apinantpongsupaht872
• Booray starts by comparing the Fuji X100V to a Jeep, stating that just like a Jeep might not be suitable for everyone, the camera also has its limitations.
• Booray suggests considering alternatives like the Fuji XT30 or the Nikon ZFC for retro-styled cameras with lower prices.
• Booray also mentions the Ricoh GR3, which is pocketable and has similar film simulations.
• Booray highlights that the Fuji X100V is unique in its retro-styling, fixed lens at f/2, built-in flash, leaf shutter, and 4-stop ND filter combination.
• Booray emphasizes that if you're not into street photography or don't understand the camera's unique features, it might not be the right choice.
• The camera's built-in flash and leaf shutter set it apart from other alternatives, making it perfect for certain photography styles.
• Price can be a factor, as similar interchangeable lens cameras can get expensive with lens additions.
• Booray addresses the misconception that other cameras are real alternatives to the Fuji X100V and argues that its combination of features is hard to find in other models.
• Booray mentions that the lens sharpness and film simulations differ slightly from previous models but still retain the unique features.
• Booray advises viewers to understand the camera's capabilities fully before deciding to buy it.
Booray finds this to be a concise synopsis of his video :)
I love my x100v. The most significant selling point for me is the lens first, leaf shutter, ND filter, and size. The lens often gets overlooked. I like the sharpness at f2 it delivers.
Great video! I just want to ask what the results of the X100V or X-T30 in low light conditions. Furthermore with the option of playing with ISO button how much grain can I expect in my photos from X100V or X-T30? Thank you beforehand!
I shoot at 3200 ISO and never have a problem. There's grain at 6400 but it really all about personal taste.
I want an X100V for the size and the film sims
So next week-end I'll see if my dealer has an X-T30 with a pancake lens 🙃
Just on your point, you could also buy an Olympus OMD-10 with retro styling for nearly half the price, and use the extra money on a great lens or two. Underrated rig, arguably best value for money out there.
I am a Canon studio photographer, but I did not want to carry all my gear around on a European holiday in July 2019. I was introduced to the X100F at the camera store, I liked the retro styling, but she had me at "it's got a leaf shutter". Back in the seventies I was a medium format wedding photographer using leaf shutter lenses, flash sync to 1/500th sec. I had to have this camera. Several things aligned and I saved around $550 on a new camera. I shot around 3000 images in those 28 days. Imagine getting a sharp image on a moving boat of the Amsterdam Harbour with a camera that small at 12 x24 inches it is fabulous. But I had frustration too, sometimes I would knock a function button, and not be able to shoot. The manual was dog eared by our journey's end. This camera is in my car kit. It goes everywhere. Camera, spare battery, 12" collapsible reflector, reflector holder with clamp, cable release, off camera flash one speedlight one trigger. I've a light stand in my car as well, but I can get studio standard images with this kit.
I want and need this camera. I've owned Fuji (X-E2 and X-Pro-2) before. Sold them because I thought I needed full-frame. Bad move. Big, heavy, clumsy, and simply does not inspire me to get out and take pictures. I prefer to shoot in full manual, and most cameras are not designed to be used that way. I also prefer the rangefinder style because it's easier to use the EVF (my preference) without smashing my nose into the LCD. The X-E4 would work, but you can't get those either. I had a Pro-2, but could never get used to its quirks, which is even worse in the Pro-3. The Leica Q3 would work, but I don't have $6K. The X-T4 would work (better than the T5) because the LCD flips around so you can use the EVF without nose prints. But, I don't like the T model's handling. So Fuji makes ONE camera that would be ideal for me under every possible circumstance, and... I can't buy one. 😞
I got the X100V for two reasons: 1. I had an X100T and loved it, and 2. I couldn't afford at the time a digital Leica M (eventually I did by trading a ton of fine analog gear towards that and was able to get me a Leica M10). Still, the X100V is unique; and as you said, there's nothing that can substitute it as an all around camera. Heads-up, you neglected to mention the digital emulation of 50mm and 75mm focal lengths, that given the superb sensor and processor, you will be hard pressed to find a difference side by side with the X-T4 fit with said lenses, unless you're shooting studio targets.
Now again, having already the M10 and a 35 Summicron, the X100V is my all around camera of choice:
1. Fast; will get you three well focused images in the time the Leica takes to wake up from stand-by (forget turn on).
2. Sharp; the new formula of the Fujinon is at least as sharp as my aging 1977 Summicron (35/2) v.4, even corner to corner and, thanks to the in camera processing, without corner vignetting or distortion (the new $7000 Summicron 35 ASPHERICAL will beat that tho). 🤣
3. Stealth; the drop down screen added to the 75mm interpolation is a sniper weapon for candid street.
4. Ergonomic; everything is where it should.
5. Highly configurable to your needs; e.g. I've got the multifunction ring configured as zoom if the camera is in AF mode.
6. Does very decent close-ups.
7. Cheap; you get camera *and lens* for the price of a similar body.
8. Weather resistant; took it to Scotland last week of October.
9. Small; fits in a meager CaseLogic pouch that will also hold a compact charger plus two extra batteries, a and the "28mm" WCL.
10. Painlessly replaceable; if it gets damaged, drowned, or stolen I can replace it virtually on site. Imagine dropping your M11 from a 2nd floor! 😖
Guess I could go on but then it would be redundant, suffice that this has become my go anywhere and favorite travel companion.
Yes ... I have done the same thing. Discarded my thoughts about X100V and Picked up FUJIFILM XT30 II with XC15-45mm F3.5-5.6 OIS PZ kit lens. And using the zoom lens I'm trying to find the perfect Focal Length for Streetphotography and everyday shooting. Thank you sir.
When I went shopping for a portable high quality camera I started with the Sony rx100 / canon g5 type shooters. When the x100v was suggested I immediately rejected it. For the same price I could get an XT3 with the kit lens. As much as I like the x100v I frankly don’t see the point of paying for the equivalent of an xpro with a fixed f/2. The XT3 electronic shutter lets you shoot f/1.2 in broad daylight, if you want, and a good flash with high speed sync lets you do fill light well above the sync speed. I could still use an ND filter for certain shots, however. With the xt3 cripes I even got a charger AND the little ex-8 or whatever it’s called pop-up flash in the box! That is actually a useful little flash at closer distances, and certainly easy to throw in your pocket. I’m glad I passed on the x100v since I take at least half my photos on the 56 or 50-140 lenses at this point and I’m never looking back!
Really enjoyed the video. About a year ago. I came to this same conclusion. As just a hobbyist, I realized all I wanted was the compact vintage look and the film simulations. So instead of splurging on the 100v, I decided to get the xt10 & the 27mm pancake and I’m very happy with my decision.
A fantastic contribution to awareness. As I listen to you speak, I keep thinking, ‘If Only!’ Bigger grip, bigger battery, stable image, heat management. However, I was brought up using Leica back in the day when you were not a true professional if you didn’t show up to a news event or a wedding without a Leica. So that indefinable feel, that amazing image quality, that quiet look of a Leica just is not on any other camera. Yep, you only get that on an X100V. Oh, how I long for the X100VI.
Where most people fail when buying a camera is deciding what they want one for in the first place. If you want to learn photography, I would start with a Canon 70D, Chinese flash, and a 24 mm lens, nifty 50, and a zoom to 300 or 400. That along with the lens that comes with the camera sets you up. Add in a few ND filters and your set to start. What's the cost? You will spend about $500. from that price-point you will be happy all the way around. Did I mention that the 70D had a built in flash?
Some great tips. Sounds like you were including new cameras in the comparison which is fair.
Options to be considered are the Fujifilm X-E1 or X-E2 as they are compact, have Fujifilm simulations and have a built in flash as well.
was just going to comment that as well. My X-E1 has a built in flash and my brother has an X-E2 which I am pretty sure also has a pop up flash
I had both, the X-E1 and replaced it with the X-E2 because of the focusing aid. Don't compare, except in size.
@@jorgemtrevino watch his video again 😉
I was thinking of selling my 100v but you convinced me to keep it. I have used it as a travel and skiiing-camera and as such it has impressed me a lot giving me stunning pictures. Sometimes I have missed having an interchangeable telelens, especially when shooting lectures and events with it. I have rarely used fill flash with this camera and actually that reminds me of why I got it in the first place. Off to France in a few days and this will be the camera in my bag.
What lens do you suggest for the xt30 that would be similar to the one on the x100v? Pancake and non pancake?
The 23mm f2 is the obvious choice. Pancake would be the 27mm 2.8 but I would get the 18mm f2. Viltrox also makes an inexpensive 23mm f1.4
@@BoorayPerry Thank you. I noticed Fujifilm also makes a 23mm 1.4, while I understand the 23mm f2 would be the "same" lens that's mounted on the x100v, if I was getting the tx30ii, wouldn't the 23mm 1.4 be a better choice?
Yes 🙂📷
Thank you. @@BoorayPerry
I went through a bunch of Fuji cameras in a few short months, lusting after an X100V but couldn't find a reasonably priced one. An X-E3, X20, X-T20, original X100, X30 & X100F, all of which had something about them that I LOVED but was missing something from one of the others.
The X20 and X30 were out because of the small sensor, but the X20 made me fall in love with leaf shutters. I bought an original X100 cheap and while it is clunky to use, the form factor and built-in ND really appealed and I found myself carrying it everywhere, despite the lousy AF.
I realized I needed a tilt screen after using the X-T20 and X30. The X-E3 is wonderful (I've kept it as my interchangeable lens camera) but alas, no built-in flash, and that noisy regular shutter. The X100F was nearly perfect but I couldn't seem to hold it without hitting all the buttons on the back (not a problem on my touch screen X-E3), and the "glowy" look at f2 close up on the X100 and X100F lens was annoying to work around.
I finally found a reasonably priced X100V and I can honestly say I haven't picked up any other camera since. The build quality, the image quality and the experience of using it is just wonderful.
Your so Spot on built in flash is mega important for all scenario's,I was struggling to find a camera that has all the features and is still small in form factor
It's so often overlooked. :)
I couldn't afford an x100 ten years ago. So I got an x30. I would've liked to have ND filters, but the fill in flash, now that's something I wanted and enjoy.
And yes, the film simulations are a big part of why I have been buying Fuji cameras since before the x30. More basic, yes, but still useful and great to have.
All statements are really valid. Same happened to me when i bought x100f. I eventually sold it after 3 years and got fuji x70 and sony rx1. I don't really need viewfinder, nd filter etc. It is really wonderfull x100 series
The best alternative is a Leica Q2. With how outrageous X100 any model pricing is, you might actually able to find a use Q2 not far off.
If you're completely clueless about photography, get an E-M10 ii, GX85, GX9, E-M5 ii/iii, or even a G9 with current used pricing. Lenses and bodies are much cheaper used relatively speaking with a matured system to pick from. I use MFT as my primary work system with an EM5iii and G9 and travel around all over for photojournalism and have never had a client tell me my gear wasn't good. I've had shots chosen for work that were shot with a Q7/QS-1/MX-1, cameras with tiny sensor relatively speaking. My partner I travel with shoots with a couple Pentax KPs and gets amazing results. Never pay over MSRP for a current X100V or over a used value that's a lot less than that for older models.
I have been using the x100v for a couple of years (before it became the internets most hyped camera). The wide angle converter is a permanent fixture. I’m taking some of the best pictures I have ever taken - not because the camera is internet cool, but because it comes with me when I travel and I don’t have to spend hours in post production when I get back (for me, this is the x100v’s biggest selling point, but never gets talked about by influencers….. I guess my point is use a camera and get good at making pictures, rather than good at buying cameras
Didn’t he say all Fuji have film simulations? Which I’m assuming is what you mean about post production?
Thats literally the main selling point that they use “i don’t have to spend hours in post“
I'm appreciating my old Fuji X10 more now. Fixed Lens - Check, Built-in Flash - Check, Film Simulations - Check, Leaf Shutter - Check, Zoom Lens - Plus, Crappy Battery - Minus. I really wish the Fuji X100 series had used a fixed zoom lens instead if a fixed focal length one.
I don’t have one. I have an x100f that I’ve used for years. It replaced an x100s. The optical viewfinder with the frame lines that adjust for parallax and teleconverter setting is the feature that no other camera line has and I love. My last film camera was a Leica M7 and the x100 series is as close as I can get (and afford) to that experience. Nice video!
Thank you for pointing that out.
As I always say too: Distinguish the difference between a "need" and a "want". With that said, I believe many people (including myself) who buys the X 100 series bought them out of "Want", only after they got it and shot with it, do they realize how capable and wonderful this camera is, then they grew to be in the "need" side. I for one switched from a 25-year Nikon experience to Fujifilm after my first, X100T a few years ago.
I have a X100T, and X100F. No X100V, (didn't think it was worth the upgrade from F), and I'm now looking into buying the XT5.. Again, a "want" haha.......
That's a tricky decision that as a 11 years Nikon DSLR user upgrade your equipments or buying an expensive small fixed lens camera. We DSLR shooters are addicted to changing lens .
@@mohammadvarzideh780 Vary true, now I have a good collection of Nikon glass and F100, F5 from the film era, all just sitting in the cabinets... haha...
@@mohammadvarzideh780 One can have both. As a 45 year Nikonian, I have the Nikon Z9 and Leica Q. 🙂
Isn't that the truth? I just hope that the people who are buying this camera because it's popular all of a sudden will find that it sparks them to want to learn more about photography so that they can truly appreciate what makes this camera unique.
@@BoorayPerry I couldn't agree with you more. And I think they all will, the X series is an inspiration.
Hi ! Thanks a lot for this video. My personal reason to get this camera is that I had a X100S before. I took some pictures in NYC and, at this point, I didn't have a correct screen to really see my pictures. I thought "oh, again more uninterested pictures...", and, I kept these pictures, but, not the camera. Once the camera was sold, I took a look again on these pictures with a correct screen with my computer, and said... Oh my... Now, I'm full of regrets, really sad. I want it back, because it's what I need, I know it, for the excellent reasons you explained in this video. Thanks for this.
You're quite welcome. 🙂📷
You made a video "not buy this camera" but it just made me want it more and aroused my curiosity about this camera)))
That's my secret power ❤️
Sent mine back after two problems, first was a lcd was changed as the screen was not able toucht mode, came back and then the write read made a lot of noises so could not use at all. Two falults was more than enough
I’m thinking of the x100f, but wheather sealing isn’t given and also no ND filter if I’m not mistaken. Do my everyday casual photos the sensor with the resolution is enough from the x100f I wouldn’t need the x100v for just that part. My Sony a7Riv is too heavy and expensive with the GM lenses to always carry it with me. I’m also happy with my EM5Mk2 but there’s still the part with the big lenses (yes a pancake would be an option) but the EM5 doesn’t have room to play for film simulations. So my best consideration is the X100F at the moment for an always on me camera. I also backed the “Flashback Camera” on Kickstarter which will be fun to use but you have to “develop” you images 24h (don’t think bad about this part, sounds stupid but this camera aims for a film style feeling although it’s digital)
So long story short, would you recommend the X100F instead the X100V? 7:00
Not instead of but certainly a great alternative. It does have ND filter but 3 stops instead of 4 🙂📷
X-E4 is great! The only minus is that it has no optical viewfinder, only digital one. But the option to change lenses won me over when I was considering between buying X100V and X-E4 and I bought the last one:)
If you want the flash capability that takes advantage of the leaf shutter/ND filter etc you can still get those capabilities with your existing system. You can always buy an ND filter for your favorite lens and a strobe that supports high-speed sync. Not as convenient as the 100V but the same results can be created without buying a $2000 camera..
Yes to the ND filter but no to the hi-speed sync. ruclips.net/video/5upPrGqt2As/видео.html :)
Also, the XS10 has IBIS and a fully articulating screen. Great for many situations
I am looking for a camera which feels like a manual film camera. With manual controls for aperture, shutter speed, ISO and focus. The X100 series can do this - and much more. Are there alternatives for this?
The XT line from Fuji has manual controls as well. I used X-T3 or X-T4 is a great camera.
Outstanding video, Booray - and the Jeep analogy is spot on. Well done.
Thanks😀📷
I think you might have sold me on the X100V lol
I am a social dancer (Salsa, Bachata, Kizomba)
I do have a Panasonic Lumix S5 Mark I that I use for my RUclips Channel.
I have taken it to dance parties to take photos but I have to take my photo bag with the accessories and since it is my RUclips camera I am constantly on edge so I can not really take photos and dance.
I have watched videos about the X100V and yours is the FIRST that mentions built in flash!!!
The fact that the camera is compact, fixed lens AND I can use it at night means the it is as if someone designed it for me lol
And you get all the capabilities for what you pay! 1399$ in the us and 1599 Euro in Europe (this includes 20% VAT Tax)
I think camera manufacturers should focus on this price range. iPhones have become so good that I might NOT upgrade my iPhone and get the Fujifilm camera instead.
The major reason I upgrade my iPhone is for the camera.
And objectively iPhones have the best video but photo-wise there are better phones.
X-S10 I have been using the X-S10 now for about six weeks and I love this camera because it has everything that we love about Fuji but has modern tech with in body stabilisation.
Ricoh GR3 and GR3x have the built-in ND filter and the Film Sims, but I agree it doesn't have a view finder or built-in flash. Though the Ricoh has become like the X100V in one unfortunate way, availability.
Brilliantly explained. I own an X-S10, and you just made it clear I don't need the X-100V
I cannot believe this camera is still in backlog in most stores. Good work for showing the alternatives.
I'm thinking of it. Hoped by now, Fuji released an upgrade and I could my hands on this one a lot cheaper.
Is there a 16-50 lense which can automatically zoom in or out controlled by the camera for the x100v fuji
Nope. It's a fixed lens.
Why you need lead shutter with crappy build in flash? How possibly someone can say “interchangeable lens is cons for me” who ever say that?
Here's why: ruclips.net/video/DgHDM8tvkpU/видео.html
You don't have to use the built in flash. You can use whatever flash you want. But the leaf shutter does make it so that any flash will do more.
I want to tell you my story, namely that I started photographing with Fujifilm (old cheap compact camera)and then I bought my first dslr canon d60 and 3 lenses. After 10 years I got tired of the same photos and a few years I didn't take any more pictures. Then, because of a friend, the desire for photos was ignited again But this time I wanted to do events. The coincidence made me argue with that friend who already had a Sony a74 camera and he was making me get one too. Now I'm oscillating between the xT5 and the new x100?The moral is that we are changeable and that we want something then no, but at least let's find what suits us best and I, for one, don't want to put money into lenses but to choose between ricoh gr iii s or fujifil x100.👍🥂
Your message could be “Don’t overpay for an X100v” instead of buy because nobody can buy one right now at retail. I’ve been looking for about 8 months but bought a Sony a7c instead initially. Love it but still wanted to try the Fujifilm film simulations and bought an x-e4 because I couldn’t find an x100v. I’m really enjoying it and love the fact that I can change lenses. Although by wallet would prefer a fixed lens.
It doesn’t have a leaf shutter, flash or built in ND filter but the fact that it has the same sensor and has great autofocus it’s still a win.
I will still buy an x100v if I can find one but I have no regrets getting the x-e4. It’s a great camera
Yes it is. :)
I don't need a X100whatever ... I need an OVF camera. Unfortunately there are not many other options around. Each time I use a X-Twhaterver camera (or other brand) for a while, I again find out that I cannot live without an optical viewfinder.
I think that people who use the OVF are kinda cool :)
I`m with Fuji since 2011, with some cameras and lenses from 10 to 400mm.
But since i bought my X100V in Dec. 2020 (together with the X-S10) i only investet money on a Godox TT350.
No more other investments. So it was my "cheapest" fotogear ever.
I use it 90% of the time and it can do all i need on a daily basis.
Btw - it`s also weather sealed.
Greets from Austria
(Plz excuse my english)
Greets! :)
I’m a 66 year old who loves to learn new things. Was a Canon shooter who switched to Sony when the mirrorless evolution occurred. Just bought the x100F used. Have some travel plans. I mostly use zoom lenses so I’m not sure about the fixed 35mm. I’d love to hear more about the simulations and edit process in camera. Do you apply the simulations before shooting? Can you change a simulation after the shot is taken? Is the original photo still available after a simulation is applied? Is the simulation applied to both raw and jpeg photos? I’m assuming simulations are the same as presets in LR. How is the editing process done in camera? Always enjoy your info on YT. Thanks!!
You choose to simulation before you take your shot and it is only applied to JPEGs. The application is permanent. If you shoot in raw it is applied to the raw when you import it into Lightroom or capture one but you can change it. I tend to shoot in raw plus jpg. That way I have the simulators version ready to go immediately after I shoot it and I can transfer it to my phone and send it somewhere and I have the raw available for when I get home in case I want to change it.
Are the Fuji simulations (presets) available in LR to apply to Raw images?
@@shep64 I believe they are.
I’m using the X70 and it got built in flash as well
My main camera is a Nikon d7500. A decently light crop factor camera system. I was still trying to figure out how to have a take anywhere camera and was seriously jonesing for one of these fujis. Based on the hype. But the price and the hype. I found an open box deal on a Lumix lx100. It has retro style. It has a decent zoom. And was priced at $450. I wrapped it in a leather half case and it looks like an old Leica. There are alternatives that don’t have all the hype. I’d love the film features of the Fuji. I’m dabbling in street photography. But I’m more of an all around photographer. A bit of street a bit of landscape. Lumix has some great compact cameras. As an alternative.
Lumix is one of the best "overlooked" brands going... :)
This is the most usefull vidéo about the X100V I ever watched. Thank you for that, because now I exactly know why I absolutely NEED this camera.
Oh lordy, you need to look at my channel. I have several videos about what makes this camera unique. :)
Is this a good travel camera along with street shooting? Will it really fit in the pocket? The 2024 could be the perfect camera for me. Sold my X-T1 and lenses. I want something smaller and easier to handle that is jam packed with features even for auto shooting. Thanks.
If you don't put a lens hood on it, it will fit in in a cargo pocket but not something like a pair pf jeans. It's at least twice as thick as your phone in a case.
The only drawback is the lack of zoom. If you can live without that then it's the perfect travel/street camera. :)
@@BoorayPerry Thanks for your reply! With the 40MP anticipated in the next model I could crop and make up for lack of zoom?
Yes, just keep in mind that a crop is different then a zoom for background compression. :)_@@paulhunter6652
I have daughters too. So, what color Jeep did you wind up buying her?
lol... I'm not that much of a pushover. :)
Another classic Booray Perry video. I am so glad I stumbled upon this channel and can heartily recommend your Photobomb podcast as well to anyone out there who hasn’t caught it yet.
That's a great thing to say! Thank you very much! :)
Right. Even used wide open at f/2, the shutter syncs with flash up to 1/1000 s even with the X100F.
X100F, the precursor of the V, has not even a tillable screen and like any X100 so far no image stabilization. But still is in itself a quite complete camera. You can add lens converters, a flash, and mount filters but usually don't need to do. No backpack like when I take longer trips with my DSRLs. Just the camera, and beginning to take photos.
Only thing I miss with X100F is Eterna simulation.
With flash, I don't use it often, but more at daylight to fill shadows than at night to light the subject.
When i bought my fuji x100f years ago, i didn't really have any expectations. Cool camera, decent pictures, brand new tech, and expensive should keep me in check for a few years. Using a jeep for non jeep purposes whatever. The little camera just works so well and everything in it is purposely built and useful... all my nikon stuff is just collecting dust.
Theres just something very releiving about adopting the fixed lens small camera lifestyle. You manage to work with it and you really don't want to go back. The funny thing is the camera is a tool. The camera tries to accomodate and work with you as best as it can; however in this instance with this camera, i feel im the one trying to accomodate as best as possible to the camera.
X-E4 also has a viewfinder, albeit a EVF only
I have an X-t5 but I recently traded an X-t20 for the X100F and am happy with it. I liked the X-t20 but I specifically wanted a fixed lens system so my X-t5 could stay home when I was going to a party or taking a walk downtown or traveling. I had heavily considered the Xpro series but felt it silly to have two interchangeable systems with the same sensor. (not to mention the cost difference). I think the x100 series is great for people who are interested in a rangefinder style but maybe cannot afford the price of a Leica or aren't ready to upgrade to the xpro series! I also prefer film photography but the cost of film is astronomical right now and I have been missing using my canon sure shot point and shoot. The x100 line up bridges that gap for me.
I like the X-E4 with at least 2 lenses and that will cost 2500-3000$. I don't have even to buy the body. I bought Canon M50 a year+ ago and I don't like much due to weight and too much setting.
Best advice you gave was to get camera with interchangeable lens, like x-t3 or x-t2, and learn the exposure triangle with the dials on top, cuz this will teach you the craft of photography, Too many people(not just TikTokers) want instant gratification, but it requires study and practice with your Fujifilm mirrorless features to explore for a lifetime of creative enjoyment. Not a sermon, just a thought.
The YT algorithm insisted that I watch this video. Ha! I didn't expect to like the video, but I do. You've done an excellent job of explaining why someone might want the X100V.
It's a Jeep! Ahahahahahaha...
I bought an X100S a couple-three years ago and played with it for awhile, made some decent captures, but never really *got* the camera. So it was set aside and I moved on to other things. But, earlier this year I decided to pick up my cameras again and started walking around with the X100S. I also carried my X-T1 now and again.
Then I fell down the FujiXWeekly rabbit hole and figured out one of the things that Fujifilm is all about... the simulations. I also learned that the X-T1 and X100S were "crippled" (in a sense) because they could not fully implement all those fascinating film simulations that Ritchie has curated so carefully. That got my attention.
So I bought an X-T5 (already have plenty of glass) and started looking for a "reasonably" priced X100V. When one came available, I bought it. I know I overpaid.
What I learned is that the X100V is a wonderful walk-around camera. It is light, handles well, and makes wonderful images, especially if using one of the film simulations *and* a light diffusion filter. These JPGs can look quite filmic, which is what I wanted. (I find the clinical sharpness almost too much for what I like to shoot.) The simplicity of a fixed-lens camera is freeing as well.
Now, I learned a couple of things... or rather think about them differently now that you've done such a good job of illuminating them. I need to learn the use of fill-flash. That will be fun. And, I get the use of the ND filters now.
I can't use a camera that doesn't have an optical finder of EVF. I'm outdoors too much and the screen is too hard to see, plus I have old eyes and have trouble getting my bifocal on the screen when holding the camera for a high angle.
You didn't mention that the X100V is weather resistant when used with a filter. The X-E4 (and others in the X-E* series) are not. I don't know about the X-PRO line. Also, the X-E2 has a built-in (pop-up) flash.
All in all, I'm very happy with the X100V. It is often my grab and go camera. It's simplicity is often the thing I like most about it, even if that limits my choice of lens the the 23mm f/2 it has. It's a very good lens. It's a very good camera. It's also a Jeep!
I'm so glad the algorithm forced you to watch 😁😁📷
I don't care about the style. I've had the X100F for a few years, as my "fun" camera. I like the ND filter, the fixed lens, AP-C sensor, size, high speed flash. I have several Nikon DSLR's, but don't always want to carry large bodies and lenses. I take the X100F with me wherever I go around town. Folks don't seem to notice when I'm using, as opposed to a DSLR with immediately raises awareness. I wouldn't consider the X100V because I like the rear controls.
Why not micro 4/3, Olympus Pen F, Omd e-m 10, Mark 2 or 3 or 4.
Well besides the obvious reasons that they aren't alternatives to the X100V, they all also start at $1300 or more with no lens.
Well explained, and that applies to all cameras. If you need a new camera (or just want it ;-) ) you should make a list of what the camera should be able to do, what is definitely necessary, and what is useful, but not necessary. and you budget of course. For me this was (2019) compact camera, big aperture, zoom lens, at least a 1 inch sensor, raw. And slow motion film and nd filters are useful. My wish was then the Sony RX100 V, but the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX15 comes very close, and was a lot cheaper. So this one it became. Both also have a leaf shutter. the LX15 can sync with the flash to 1/4000. The Sony syncs up to 1/2000 but does have a built-in ND filter and can film up to almost 1000fps. Chose what you definitely need to have, and see what you can afford. And definitely look at the model you want to purchase. Newer does not always mean more, something regularly things can disappears. eg; the newer sony RX 100 no longer have an nd filter.
Pair the X100V with the small Fuji EFX20 flash, which can be triggered by the built in flash and flash sync upto 1/4000.... man, you now have the ultimate portable off camera flash set up! The built in flash will serve as a fill light, the EFX20 (angled around 80 degrees from the camera) will be your main light and the setting sun serves as your back light! You have an instant three light set up outdoors right there!!
I ended up going with the xpro 3 because I like changing lenses and it fit my hands better than the smaller xe4. X100v is absolutely awesome, I just think people should also look at other cameras and not think the x100v is the end all. Ask yourself this…if some tik Tok Instagram superstar didn’t mention this camera, would you be even looking at it in the first place? They’re called influencers for a reason…
What about the X-M1 ?
I would wait for a X-M2 or X-M3....
I have XE-3, any suggestions for me what to buy next? Thinking to buy this one (x100v).
You really have to make a list of what is important to you and then start looking :)
get an xe-4! it was worth the two month wait- even though apparently it's being discontinued
Thank you for your video. Even though I own many cameras from Sony, Canon, Nikon, and Fuji since the X100 series did not support interchangeable lenses I stayed away from it. I guess I never bothered to learn about its special features of a leaf shutter, built in ND, but having a built in flash was not special because I had plenty of flash experience going back to the film days and always owned several. But after watching your video now I do want to add one to my collection even though my other half dozen digital and half dozen film cameras are full frame. From Fuji have owned X-Pro, X-E1, X-E2, and now X-E3 still, along with X-T1, X-T2, X-T3, and X-T4 so I am familiar with the film simulations I am really a RAW shooter and often using Cobalt mage software to do post camera film simulation. Thanks for showing what is unique about this little marvel. Will buy if the price ever comes back to normal but until then I will not miss a shot I need while waiting for it. Take care.
Thanks for watching! 🙂📷
I've been photographing professionally for over 40 years. I mostly used the hasselblad and mamaya with leaf cheddar lenses
And
You are right
If they don't understand what the camera does
They should look at something else
I think most people would be happy with a camera that has an interchangeable lens mount and has a simple zoom from 18-55
Or maybe one of those lenses that are 18 - 200
Thanks for the comment. 😀📷
I especially love the "Is it everything?" section. Those questions you asked in that section are so apt, Booray! The amount of people I see asking which camera they should get and saying they want a Sony A7 III, and then saying all they will do is post on Instagram. People need to think more clearly about needs vs wants. Funny you mentioned Leica as I was actually looking for an alternative to my M10-R as a small backup kit lol. Thanks for the great video.
I think a lot of people don't realize how easy it is to get a camera that will do what you need for a pretty good price nowadays. They don't realize that the Fuji X100V costs more money because of the things it can do that only matter if you are really into photography.
I am not gonna lie here, this my Top 5 videos on RUclips and sir I understand your Greek, thank you. I’d wanna be where you are in 20 years. God bless you
lol Thanks!
Thanks
Thanks!
Yes, I know exactly what you were talking about and that is why I purchased the X100V just after its initial release…still happy and no plans to replace at this time. Also have the super compact and “eye-candy” looking EF-X20 flash from my x100, x100s and x100T days and still use it for longer camera battery life during outings when requiring flash…this flash is not available any more and yes, wayyyy too expensive to buy used just like a used X100V is at this time.
I had that flash too but switched it for the Godox TT350 so i could bounce
Remember the Leica Cult back in the day? Well, my opinion is that the members of that sect just wrote FUJI on the marquee of their old church. What kind of person buys a Fuji? In my opinion, those who love to make their cameras a subject of conversation, like those Leica slingers, of yesteryear looking for a reputation. I agree that Fuji cameras are fine tools, but retro looks won't make you a great photographer. I firmly believe that Fuji cameras are dedicated to the Artisan of the image. Not for the action or the casual street shooter. Portable phones will suffice.
Your exposition is clear and very well-centered.
I unequivocally agree with you.
Keep on sharing.
🎉 The Leaf 🌿, Flash, and especially the 4 Stop ND Filter...I'm just not willing to 😂 pay for it. And as popular as it is, why stop making it?
Great advice !!! My go to camera is a 1953 Kodak Retina I and IIa film rangefinder. I bought them, and did a complete teardown on both including the shutter and the Retina Ia (1a) had a sharper image than my Fuji digital cameras !!
For digital I shoot a Fuji XT-1. Lo-Fi, cheap and it works for ME.
my Son wants a Jeep too. I told him to get a job and save for it. 😜
I still have the original X100 I purchased in 2011, just wish I could find my battery charger for it, seems to have gone missing in a house move 😟 love the images from it
Thanks for trying to help keep some of these available for those of us who kinda can't settle for an alternative
I do what I can. :)
How good is performance of this camera 📸 vor vloging? I want camera which can grab entire human body fully standing up into the frame from no more than hand distance away.
No camera can do that unless it is a fish eye lens
@@BoorayPerry I don't like fish eye effect. So has to be ultra wide camera 📸🤳
If you find something that can capture head to toe with no distortion from 2 feet away let me know. :)@@LORDVADER357
Over and above all the desirable features you list, my greatest desire is for a camera that has the ability to produce absolutely pristine, sharp images.
I owned an X100F for three years, and I never used the built-in flash about four times. In those cases, I didn’t really need the fill flash, but just used it as a “can’t hurt” assist. Now, I have an X-Pro3 with multiple lenses that I love to experiment with, a camera with bigger ergonomics for my massive meaty claws, and a workflow that supports my shooting style in a much more transparent way. I’ll also note that the vast majority of X100V shooters aren’t going to use the flash syncs up to 1/4,000th. It’s nice to have, but for 97% of X100V shooters it’s certainly not a dealbreaker.
Not to mention an external flash on a monopod to shoot subjects on a bright day with rembrand light wide open. Looks like a medium format camera with a porty strobe
The best approach to understanding what you really need. Thanks a lot!
Yes, a flash that syncs at 1/4000s at F/2 is a big deal when most flashes will sync only at 1/250s, but you'll agree that a built in flash doesn't produce images as good as off camera flash for things like say portraits. So forgive me, maybe the inbuilt flash is not a big deal at all. It makes sense to get a different camera, put on a hot shot flash trigger and use an off camera flash that is angled at your subject - gives much better results!
I would say that the onboard flash is not a big deal at all if you want to be a person who is carrying around portrait lighting. 🙂
You made me lock-in my decision to get the x100v. Great review!
Thanks! :)
I’ve owned the X100V for nearly three years, I love it. It’s my main camera.I initially purchased due to size, but I love the user interaction, and the results. There’s nothing not to like.
The viewfinder is a godsend when shooting in extremely sunny conditions where the screen washes out or there’s too much glare.
Fuji x70 has built in flash, leaf shutter, apsc, tilt screen, built in nd filter, and is smaller than the x100v. It just doesn’t have a viewfinder but honestly most people just use the lcd anyway. It also doesn’t focus as fast as the 100v
And 16mp instead of 24 but still a great alternative that looks cool too!
@@BoorayPerry that’s right but 16 is more than enough for it’s intended purpose. The tilt screen can tilt all the way forwards for selfies with your friends too, which is something the x100v cannot do.
Nice video but i dont think u know what alternative means😀✌️