Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Mr. Steele $900 Apex RTF vs. $200 iFlight Cidora | WHICH WOULD YOU PICK
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 авг 2024
- Uncertain about what to buy? Check out THE ULTIMATE FPV SHOPPING LIST: www.fpvknowita...
SUPPORT ME ON PATREON at: bit.ly/2Ep5Sia
THIS IS MY FULL TIME JOB. Here are other ways that you can support me: www.fpvknowita...
---
I paid $900 for the Mr. Steele Apex RTF kit from GetFPV. And then I bought the $200 iFlight Cidora and flew them back to back. How much better can the Mr. Steele Apex RTF be? And is it really something special, or is it just another 5" quad, with a massive price tag.
Want more? Here's a detailed flight review of the Steele quad:
• I bought Mr. Steele's ...
And here's a detailed flight review of the Cidora:
• How good can a $200 qu...
-- PRODUCT LINKS --
I receive a commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase after clicking one of the affiliate links below.
Purchase the iFlight Cidora SL5-E at:
* GetFPV - bit.ly/2VRsCA8
Purchase the Mr. Steele Apex 5" RTF (fully built) at:
* GetFPV - bit.ly/3bkfgk3
Save $300 by building it yourself. Buy the kit:
* TBS - bit.ly/3deAHnG
All I can think of is getting 200 stuck in a tree or 900 stuck in a tree LOL.
yeah when renting a chainsaw and sneaking into the park at night is a viable option you know its a bit much
@@testaccount4191 Lol, I can imagine the whole operation in my head.
@@yannickg6904 ruclips.net/video/nKwpLPQcRyc/видео.html
@@testaccount4191 Lol
Always good to carry an overinflated small basketball to knock the stuck quad out of a tree.
If I had $900 to burn then I'd get the Cidora and I'd buy the DJI Goggles and Air unit from Banggood with the change. #simples
There's some IQ points right there!
Very good point👍👽👍
hmm.... big brain
Me 2
Only an idiot would buy a quad for $900.00 and how about when you crash..na I'm good I can build 3 quads for that or ever 2 awsome quads for that kind of price .
I'd get 4 Iflight Cidora's and crash for days and still have 100 bucks left, instead of the mr steel apex.
or build your own steele quad for quite a bit less.
Matthew Doherty I would get some t motor motors, instead of the stout, because I think you will obly pay the name...
I agree.. or buy 4 different 5" quads and do your own shootout
There’s always the “buy 4 Cidoras for the same price as the Apex for when you explode them on new tricks” option, too. I’ve always been curious about KISS and Steele doesn’t put his name on anything he’s not 100% behind - dude is particular but very in tune with what he’s looking for.
@@grandmaster-grouch i threw up in my mouth three times while reading this
@@grandmaster-grouch what kind of Bugatti? 😳
Yang Gang lmaoooooo😂
Just amazing to have such an honest quality reviewer in this community 👌
The $300 difference is the included magic smoke they preinstall in the ESC.
I assume your talking about the kiss 4n1... my experience, never smoked one in 1 solid year of flying and crashing hard. I couldn’t tell you how many BLHeli’s I’ve smoked some just flying around and some on hard crashes. They are pricy though...
@@apsfpv2217 I think that it largely comes down to the manufacturer and their QC practices. I've blown a countless number of Holybro ESC's before deciding to try different brands, and I've only blown one other ESC since that point. You know what you're getting with KISS. Flyduino has every reason to make sure that their one product isn't shit. It's more of a tossup with the BLHeli esc's.
@@apsfpv2217 I see many kiss esc on fire look like it's normal :/ I'm not kidding 4n1 and individuals. You can blame the builder if you want
You mean the 700 dollar difference
@@mikesullivan5851 $900 RTF - $600 of parts = $300, RTF Apex vs cost to build it yourself.
Yesterday I decided to throw out all kiss stuff due to their quality management and one day later, you test a Kiss Quad and the ESC blows up. Made my day 😂 Will never put any hand on a Kiss Quad again.
Matek fcs and spedix escs bro
it flies just so much better but i get you. flying 4s fettec does help
I’ve had my kiss gear on the same quad for almost three years and no issue
arrow fpv same. Some people just don’t know what they’re doing
@@mhoovair89 I run over 20 Betaflight Quads with no issues. If so as you say, Kiss is at least not super simple 😅 My last kiss issue was a desync after several Lipos out of nowhere.
I had the same experience out of my Steele build and I built it while watching Steel's youtube build filed the holes, and still had the kiss ESC fry on the first flight, went with a diatone stack after and it flew amazingly!
So $900 quads arrives in a plain cardboard box, offers little more than a$200 one and goes up in smoke at the end. You made a great point here JB. Marketing works. I need an iFlight DC5. DJI now.
Mr. Bardwell, next step is to build a KISS quad by yourself (and tune it up) and compare it to the Mr. Steele edition one.
There's nothing that justifies a 900$ FPV quad (old camera, bad ESCs (people say), +150$ frame without lifetime warranty). If people think that a 900$ FPV quad is going to raise their pilot skills to the top pilots level... think again. At a certain point (when you have reliable equipment), there's no amount of money that's going to make you a better pilot. I can get a Mr. Steele edition quad and I'm going to end face first at the side of a building like with any other quad. Oh, and there are CMOS cameras as fast as the CCD ones now a days. What's the point on using HDO 2 with a CCD camera?
You for example. You are doing this 3 batteries per day challenge, with differents quads and your piloting skill are much, much better. Imagine if you practise with the same exact quad all those flights. Mr. Steele is one of the best (if not the best, even if I don't like how he flies) because he has been flying the same quad for nearly 5 years and of course because he dedicates hundreds (if not thousands) of hours to fly. Call it dedication, passion... whatever.
As told, I'd love to see you build a DIY KISS quad (maybe FETtec and XING-E motors) and your take on it. Maybe even a "how to build" a KISS quad with the stand alone OSD (can't understand why, because I still remember the Minim OSD wiring and flashing. Nightmare!).
(why aren't the spaces between paragraphs working?) (got they working doing double spacing)
The apex does have "lifetime" warranty though on all the carbon parts... (at least that's what the website says and also a friend of mine who bought the frame)
And regarding ccd vs cmos - I personally like the picture of ccd better, that's Personal preference though (even though I did change to dji recently)
@@Averell64 Two year warranty, is what they state.
@@Kikerumbo ah yeah, I knew there was something, hence the quotation marks... I personally do find that fair though seeing how almost no-one flies a quad for more than 2 years
Mr. Steele ripping off the people that made Him famous! Top shelf parts and tune is capable on almost any quad. I don't like paying inflated prices just to make some idiot rich!
@@MrIndyjonescj Well sir, he made a name for himself and he isn't pointing a gun to make anyone buy "his" products.
If money wasn't a problem for me, I'd like to try that quad and see for myself how good is it.
Anyways, I'm with you about that any quad can be tuned to "perfection". Sadly, to do that with Betaflight, you nearly have to have unlimited time or a PhD. Hehe
There is nothing wrong with buying something because of the brand! If you can afford it, more power to ya! I’m just glad there are more options now more than ever! Also Joshua the beard looks really good on ya! I’m jealous, I can only grow a $200 beard and yours looks like a $900 one 😭
Me neither
I was driving RC cars 15 years ago. I remember the RC car alone being close to 1000$. The motor 350$. electronics 250$ (for the car). The the remote 400$ ... RC drones are ridiculously cheap compared to that. Which is absolutely awesome .
I totally agree!! For what we get it's gotta be the cheapest hobbie going for the fun factor. You don't have to spend big bucks to rip and race the sky's.
maybe in the end you spend more because of crashing? i don't know about rc cars.
@@jorgeromero4680 maybe but I feel the fun against RC at least for me is incomparable. I never understood the appeal of line of site RC, no judgment everyone has thier opinion and preferences:)
You are right. Every practice outing u need fuel, glow plug, tires, etc
yep some of my fixed wing AC were nearly 5k
Joshua, put fc and esc from Cidora to Apex, makes is bf, than fly it. And than tell as is that precision flying comes from kiss, or from lighter quad, 2306 more torque motors with light props. After that conclusion, put your favorite cmos fpv cam to apex and fly again and make final conclusion. 💪👍👀🇭🇷
P.S. I don't want to fire 100$ esc with out reason, that is a half of price od BF quads. 🤔
That would actually be a perfect test to validate the actual Kiss magic.
Yea that'd be really interesting to see!
I agree, would love to know if it was kiss magic or the actual build and components.
@@SirDanMartin One thing I've been wondering is how well would Kiss electronics work on a 7in build. Would it make it easier to tune?
Your 3 packs a day look like they're paying off - beautiful flying there Josh
Worst FPV accident:
Joshua shreds a chicken
@Seiishu lol np man
MR. STEELE!!! couldn't be more appropriate of a name! 900 dollars and the esc smokes! He files the holes ....for 900 dollars it better come filed. Hence RTF, 300 dollar part mark up off retail! Which they dont pay! If your trying to constantly push it, hit gaps and new spots your gonna crash (all the time) .....you can build like 4 solid rigs with awesome components for 900, that's insane. I've been flying for 6 years now, my builds get cheaper and cheaper. Tbs source one v2 frame, is in my opinion the best frame for freestyle. Dollar for gram! Great video Josh.
That's what I'm saying!
4 quads plus repair costs will get a lot more longevity for someone who isn't a "pro" and can't even tell the difference on flight from one to the next.
I agree, @$900 dollars, WTF, you could build one for $350, and tune it to fly as good or better. And yes, if you're going to smash it, why would you buy a $900 dollar quad?
I don't get it, but I don't need to! If you can afford it, you're happy with it, great, but it isn't going to make you a better pilot in the end. I would suggest, take your current build, and buy a better VTX, FPV Camera, and antenna!
Hahaha
Yah right
we know where the extra cash is going.. :) Steele has been sporting some pretty nice rides as of late. Good for him to finally cash in on this hobby.
maybe hes funding a lambo or ferrari
He deserves it
Once you get the mr. steel quad flying again, put a cmos camera in it. I’m curious if the latency makes that big of a difference.
Check out Linus Tech Tips "does higher FPS make you a better gamer - Featuring Shroud" Youd be surprised how much a tiny bit of extra latency throws a wrench into things. Some people are more sensitive to it, and some dont notice it at all. The ones that dont notice it at all have less of a skill cap then the ones who have higher sensitivity. The more sensitive / faster reflexes person is more cut out to be a pro gamer, or even a jet fighter pilot.. Some people just dont have the eye hand coordination or the reflexes.
I need to watch this video as I'm building up my new build. No shame in taking some design ques from good designs!
You have to file the KISS ESC holes because it is I believe 29.5 X 29.5 and the mounting on the Apex is 30 X 30.
You stretch the ESC if you don’t file it down and even more so as the frame naturally flexes it will damage the esc.
I have seen this only happen to people that did not file it down and installed gummies. 👊🏽
I can't say as to what happened. I'm sure Steele is following up with GetFPV to be sure it's being done to his specifications.
Ok, so pay 900$ bnf, and than repair it by your self? Getfpv charge that 300$, where id the warranty for their work. Apex holes are 30,5 x 30,5, all BF esc and FC is 30,5 x 30,5 so it's good, but only kiss stuff is 30 x 30, I know that, everybody who build quads know that, getfpv doesn't know that. That is disgracefully for getfpv and for 300$ paying for bulid.
FPV truism applies at @16:00 folks.
The "you dont know what you dont know" saying applies with regard to the secret sauce moments worth paying attention to. This something worth paying attention to given Bardwell does SO MUCH tuning inside of Betaflight. He is comparing the Steele build to his own builds and tuning experience.
This is the kind of thing I wish I could see/experience within the FPV realm is getting to fly the various different drones of all the Unicorn/Diety tier FPV pilots. To see what I am missing in terms of tune and finding out if the limits is in the gear/tune or within myself.
Having flown a few different quads of other pilots, I think what's sets them apart is the rates. Once you get a decent tune you probably won't find much difference, but the rates make it.
@@elmattbo2540 true enough. I have all my builds tuned down to around 650 and running .2 expo. One of these days I think I will try playing with my rates a bit more.
An extra $700 gets you a zip tie on your xt60
Best channel for drones on RUclips! The clarity, in depth explanations and expertise definitely set you apart!
Those ceramic capacitors fail short circuit when cracked. Usually happens when the PCB is bent or stressed, so it might be very well possible that it had something to do with the way its mounted, also there are always some capacitors that go out of factory underperforming and eventually develop a short circuit.
Pandemic times calls for pandemic prices...... I'll go with the $200. I just need to get it pass through my congress "wife*
I got the nazgul thanks to the pandemic stimulus. And my wife of course.
Always check with the finance dept, so that it does not become the war department.
Whait a minute! the almost 1K Mr Steele drone burn out in a couple flys?
My wizard x220s didn't even burnout on first few flights and that's a 160$ kwad
🤔🤣🤣
Sounds like a very honest review, from whom I expect absolutely nothing less. Great work J Bardwell. 🙂
your kiss flight indeed looks nicer. you can see the higher trust, you have there. Joshua unleashed. I'm on Fettec (Kiss FW) now and can feel the difference to betaflight also. I immediately started to crawl through trees where I have not been before. Doing things I didn't do before. Kiss feels more direct, faster and calmer at the same time. Big, filed holes in the 4in1- check, big extra capacitor - check, spike absober diodes - check^^
Fanboys be like...
29:16 as ESC burned, please put FC and ESC betaflight compatible to test how it feels to fly :)
This! I would be very interested.
Spoiler ...flies great, ive got 2 on dji
Like others I'm also keen to know what makes the Steele quad feel more responsive. Surely you could swap out components and retest in the name of science! 🤔
THE MOST Excellent, Professional discourse I've had the pleasure and privilege to have come to watch your production!!! Outstanding Delivery! REFRESHING to hear, see, understand , from such clear communication skills. A pleasure to watch/listen. I am a fan
Bardwell is a class act
I have both and they fly just as well. Apex is a bit shorter and has less room for components, but the package seals together like hand-in-glove. lightness of the Cidora is a definite plus but arm strength leaves much to be desired (while the Apex is nearly smash proof). Really two great frames.
I would love to see a video where you swap components one-by-one between the quads and find where the biggest gains are in the Steele machine. Just turn the Steele into a Cidora one piece at a time and let us know what you felt....maybe swap those parts into the Cidora and fly them too for confirmation....thanks for all the great work!
Matt F pthis
That would be dope and super interesting
Matt F Amazing idea
Small history trivia: 3d printing is around for over 40 years. It was like 10years ago that the patents expired.
I remember the first one i built 8 years ago... lots changed since then😂😂😂
Finished watching... good video! Seriously put a FETtec stack on the Cidora and you will get it to perform almost the same as the Steele build.
Stout motors: there is just something about the whole package, they are strangely efficient and the control is ridiculous. But any good motor will perform similar.
KISS: The control is out of this world and you hit the nail on the head for some reason with KISS I am more confident, I think it simply has less latency than BF.
Apex: Expensive but molded parts are expensive and they are very durable. The frame is very rigid and durable. Stack screws never need to be accessed unless you crack your rear plate.
KISS HW: I have no experience personally but I see them blow the magic smoke on video all the time. Go FETtec.
Hey i just wanted to THANK YOU, for all the great Betaflight and drone tutorials you've done and your professional explanations. You can't imagine, how much this helps me, to understand the FPV drone world.
I'm a total noob and i managed to solder reciever ,flash QX7 Access transmitter, R-XSR reciever, bind, put the newest firmware on both and also restore my saved data from Betaflight into my drone and also setup failsafe and some other stuff. All this on my first day and the drone is still working properly :-)
Thank You.
Maybe they charge you an extra 300 because of the time they spent putting the screws in the bottom ? :D
I guess Mr Steel won’t be your friend anymore 🤣
Holy crap the kiss esc popped! Lol. Awesome that you got it on video. I’m sure you being a well know RUclips guy can get it replaced no problem but getting KIss replacements is like trying to win lotto. I have a stock pile of dead Kiss electronics and I finally stopped adding to the pile.
$300 is reasonable for several hours of production quality building and flight testing time. The build does not look like a rushed "bang it out" quality. It requires someone with a particular, technical skill set to do the build, test, and trouble shoot to make it right. I'd say from start to finish charging 4 hours at $75 per hour is fair for a high-end hand-built and flight-tested licensed/signature halo product.
That is true, and keep in mind there is a royalty to support Mr. Steele in there as well.
Can you please do a new “perfect quad build”?🚁👍👍
so would you say the iFlight is a good learning drone, as opposed to spending $900 right away?
What a brilliant video...... You've clearly put loads of work into this.
Hey! Abrasion resistance of TPU is usually higher than that of other more rigid polymers as ABS, PS, etc
Diego Pedro and absorbs shock shittonz better
Hey Joshua,
if you ever get around to it I would be interested if your feeling changes if you swap the cameras or do a CCD vs CMOS comparison.
Also, is there big differences in the available CMOS cameras or are they all similar in latency?
Check out drone mesh or gal kremer. I’m pretty sure they’ve tested like all the new cmos cameras between them.
The predator have a 4ms latency I don't think any ccd camera can compare
"lets talk about motors, i feel like i'am going to piss someone off" "Better to be pissed off then pissed on" \m/ X_x \m/
Really enjoy your skillful choice of wording to describe the comparison of the two. Great job JB. I want one of each!
My first quad was a Diatone GTM530 for about $210. Flew great with little prop wash, and I was able to tune that out. Super durable too with a beefy cage and super thick arms. For the price I paid I couldn’t be happier for a first quad. Getting ready to build a dedicated freestyle from a remix V2 or BangGod.
Catalyst Machineworks will build pretty much any 5 inch quad for $150 in labor. I would rather pay them $150 to build it for me over $300 to GetFPV.
I think you're forgetting the royalty to Mr. Steele in there...
150 bucks? I'll do it for 30
I have a lot of custom quads from catalyst. Love their race and freestyle quads.
I am expecting this comment section to be spammed to the moon and beyond with fan boys from either side xD
Please let me just say that this has been one of the best comparisons between these two FPV platforms I have seen so far. Thank you JB for doing such an honest and in depth look at each.
It is important to remember that the comparisons in this video were between the Cidora and the Mr Steele Apex build, and not kiss vs betaflight. However, I would love to see JB go with this momentum and do what I have always wanted to try, and that is to really do a proper scientific comparison between betaflight and kiss. Because, "The Best Flying Kwad" is a spectrum and not a black and white thing. I am a pilot that has been flying betaflight since I started and I am convinced I can tune BF to fly like kiss, in fact I recently spent more than half my monthly earnings to build a kiss kwad. So once I can get some proper stick time in with that I'm keen to see what I can do with my Cidora to match it.
With that said I don't have the means to do what I really want to do, but JB might? JB I think if you are up for this, the only way to make it fair would be to build two identical kwads but on both firmware types and see if you can tune both to what you personally and subjectively view is the best kwad feel. I would love to know if anyone here might have better ideas to test this? I have been drooling at kiss since I started but through the years the firmware gap IMHO has gotten so small... It's just a pitty BF doesn't ship with good defaults (for a good reason I might add but the result is the same). So a tune is mandatory on any BF build (and technically all other builds but if you want the baseline to be a Mr Steele feel).
IDK, I might be rambling, any other opinions on this page?
SIDE NOTE: Everyone has their input on this probably but I would also like to share that one of the worst things in the Cidora package are those 51 inch props. The amount of response I gained on my personal unit when I put some S3 or S4 props on it was staggering. So that should also help with reaction time, confidence and propwash like what was mentioned.
Keep making Awesome videos JB!
Actually wanted to add that I think kiss would come out on top... but what Im interested in is by how much? mmmmmm :)
How can you be a fan boy for a company? Steele is a douche. So that parts agreed for fan boy comments.
@@vampcaff I'm afraid I don't understand your question, sorry 😅. I will say though I like Mr steele. He got me into this hobby back in Jan 2017. He's fun to watch 😆.
Really interesting thoughts here... Thank you for your comment!
@@MrMarcosyMrsLaura cheers bro! Yeah I think as long as everything else is exactly the same except for the firmware( and thereby obviously the FCs and Escs) it would make for a very interesting test.
I just simply dont have the funds to build two kwads like that. Especially not with how expensive kiss is
Yeah... you have experienced KISS. It really does feel different and flies exceptionally well when properly built. The ESC fire was strange, must be a 6S issue in the absence of a capacitor. You should have listened to those who warned you :). I have been flying KISS for 5 years and I haven't had a single ESC fire.
Seattleite FPV really that good? Have you flown radix?
Nice to watch someone who clearly knows what he is talking about. Nice job! As far as the $300, It's not that unreasonable. You said if you know what you're doing it would take a bit over 2 hours. Call it 3 hours, cause you have to deal with it, set it up, test it, etc. That's $100/hr for labor. What does your car mechanic charge you for 3 hours labor?
If you have 900, buy a 200 quad and dji fpv system.
Seriously THIS
I have no issue with the Steele drone costing $900. If someone with $$ wants to just buy one ready to fly let them. If you want to save $$ and build your own that's cool too. That's the great part of Capitalism endless choices.
I fly KISS on a runcam eagle micro and HT Freestyle motors and its definitely not the camera or even his motors. Its the throttle control. Kiss throttle control in unparalleled. I didn't even think about how important it was until I flew KISS. I have builds running F1, EMU and KISS and you can tell the difference. I pull out the KISS setup when I need the most confidence in a really bad flight idea lol.
This is the best comment I’ve seen. I have the same array of set ups and couldn’t agree more
Thank You Joshua for your super honest and informative feedback!!!
Who else is here in the comments section looking for Steele 🤣
Doubtful. He doesn't even reply to comments or questions on his own videos.
@@highlandcrawler you know what they say, it's lonely at the top 🤣👍
@@highlandcrawler Yea he does
I think rarely would gave been better wording. I'm just talking comparatively. He usually has 100-400 comments or so and usually 10 or less will be from him. And I dont fault the guy one bit for it. He is a very motivated and bust person and you can only be some many places in a day doing things. I'm thankful he gives us the cool videos he does and will always look up to his flying ability.
Pain in the RC I look for Steele as bout as much as I look to catch covid)
the iflight would be my choice
In terms of instant responsiveness, I have a video on my channel from my own personal design with the Xing motors (2207) where I caught myself basically instantly. It's the video that's 43 seconds long. I'm still very new to the hobby, but as an engineer, I think that matching the right prop to the right motor is more important.
One of your better vids. Entertaining and informative. Great flying.
done, buy cidora with your link.
ternyata berawal dari sini 😂
Steele camera have really low latency for CCD(14ms and usually they have 33ms), but there a lot of CMOS cameras with less latency, as I remember predator 4 have min latency 4ms. So latency of this camera is just average.
yeah ... this latency things confuses me ... there are definitely CMOS cams with high latency, but plenty that are quite a bit lower than CCD and that seems to be a big part of the reason racers like Foxeer Predators or Runcam Racers. All the Runcam Swifts add like 10ms to the Predator's latency. Where are you finding the latency on the Ethix cam. I can't find the min/max/average anywhere.
@@CesiumSalami gal kremer tested it on RUclips. ruclips.net/video/UtLPm7c3PXs/видео.html
That confidence with Stelle's quad was KISS. I had the exact same experience with my first KISS quad.
I have been flying KISS since the Very first 24 amp ESCs came out, and I can say that caps do make a difference on KISS builds, as I'm sure that they do on all builds. I've tried them with and without..... They catch on fire eventually either way haha! I will never switch though, I just stay away from 4-1s, they ALWAYS fail.
Tried a Mr Steele kiss v1. Flew great but not worth the cost imo. To sorta closed source feeling compared to beta
The cheapest one xD I cant even put the 200$ actually lol
Your are not the only one☺️
ur not the only two
Thank you for your honest review. 👍
I learned something today! Stop buying random components and wasting time building. Buy cidoras bnf, throw crsf in it and spend more time sending it for less money! thanks JB
I'd pick the one I build myself for $150...steel stuff is too hot way to hot sorry
Not gonna lie, yeah I was impressed...by the lack of quality of Steele’s 900$ quads, they’re just not really up-to-date and completely overpriced. Even my basic 250€ quads are better and far more robust, the only thing it does best is keeping that weight down, which is pretty cool, but it ain’t worth that much.
Also can’t believe Steele’s quad failed with such a basic thing as electronics at 24:00 ; that’s why I always put capacitors on the ESC. Doesn’t matter if it flies well out of the box, as it gets some bumps and motors get damaged, voltage spikes become more frequent and u better have some capacitors installed to better absorb them.
If it were a 300$ quad, It’d be a fine quad as long as we don’t take the electronic failure into account, but being so overpriced...for me It’s been quite a disappointment :/
but can you get the same handling on one of your quad for that? i mean if yes share it please
BlueJay Yes, all you need is great acceleration, decent ESCs and motors with enough torque to handle those rapid changes in prop rpm. The acceleration is key if you want to make your kwad “floaty” such as mr Steele’s ones, the key for it isn’t to have super powerful motors, but instead to reduce the quad’s weight. That gives you less inertia, which makes those rapid changes in speed and orientation both less energy costly, and less hard on your battery as well, which also increases your flight time (that’s why Steele can do so many tricks in a row and still get like 5 min of flight time).
Also PID tuning and Betaflight filters are key to making your quad as smooth as possible in flight. That is one great example of something I still don’t fully understand and that I’m still learning about, mainly because they are extremely specific for each quad, which is where Steele has his experience to allow him to tune his quads to perfection, whereas I’d still have to test mine and fly them a lot more to match his level of tuning.
I’m currently working on a RUclips channel to explain these sort of things, but it’ll take some time to be ready since it implies a ton of work, experimenting and it also requires of lots of money to be invested in this hobby (and also the 3D printing hobby, which will be another significant part of it). Bringing interesting content to the table ain’t cheap, and I also feel like I still need to learn a lot of stuff before trying to teach other people, it’s just that, in my current experience, I know you can build 3 awesome kwads, just as good as Steele’s or perhaps even better with those ~900$
U know man, you are the reason i got into fpv. I appreciate ur work and knowledge. Btw I built my first Cidora quad and am super happy with it it worth the money and effort. Cheers!
Nice honest review. I have both. After flying them I agree with your assessment 100%. However, I believe that only pilots with more experience would appreciate the differences between the two. Yes the Cidora is that good. For the new Pilot, buy yourself a Cidora, swap in a Cadix Vista and buy yourself the DJI goggles. You will still have enough left over for a spare CIdora when you smash your first one....Which you will do. Just my opinion.
I would totally buy a 900 dollar quad if I KNEW it would never blow up or fry a motor.
...
But then here we are, and the 900 dollar quad blows up just the same as the 200 dollar quads we all fly. So why should I ever get a 900 dollar drone?
Who else loves Mr. Steele?😍
I have to agree on the motors.
When ever I'm not sure about something drone related there is only two places I go here and uavfutures
All of my drones have been built around these channels...
Thank you for your content and your love of the sport and hobbie.
5/10 fpv freestyle is my go to when I'm feeling down and out
Just gets me away from reality, makes me feel free
Pulled my old drone out like two days ago after about eight months of storage, honestly I was scared to fly her again.
But feels good to be back in the air and now I've got several months of videos to watch and go through.
Thank you from Australia 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
No smart audio for 1000$ you gotta be kidding me!! Entry level 150$ eachine and arris have it standard wow.
Iflight should just stick to motors and frames, their escs aren’t bad but the FCs are really hard to deal with.
Seeing how it comes. Ive changed my mind about it being worth 900. Flys amazing. Best thing ive ever seen u fly. But too many loose ends out the box for 900 tag.. Cheers for this.
Awesome review! I’d love to see something exactly like this but for the DJI compatible RTF kits that are available. GetFpv has a Lumineer and a Xilo, RotorRiot has their Skyliner. Love to see some direct comparisons.
Neither, get the new T-Motor FT5 BNF with T-motor frame, stack and motors, Caddx Ratel, RushTank VTX then chuck the running gear in an Apex frame.
How's the drop top? lol
Rushtank = Trashtank
Levi Cook Have you had a bad experience with the Rushtank? I run mostly TBS and a couple Tramps but put a Rushtank into a freestyle build powered directly from 6S and it’s been rock solid for 6 months, I was going to buy more I hope they don’t have QC issues.
@@johncitizen3361 I heard there were some batches that had very bad issues. I also saw other people complaining about it.
SuperSigma ahh that sucks, quality control is a problem with a lot of the cheaper stuff.
900 for an fpv quad is a rip off
A lot of people in this hobby seem to have more money that they do brains. Any one who pays 900 for a quad deserves to get ripped off.
Steeles personally built omes are $1700
But you get $300 worth of magic smoke.
@@flo-ridafpv5713 yeah no for $1700 I could get a 30CC warbird with a Saito 3-cylinder on the nose.
@@porroco well you could buy 3 different quads that are pretty good for that price. Even 900$ its gonna break at some point
Tbh, it might sound weird, but I did notice that I preferred the actual flying on the steele quad. Hard to put my finger on it but the refined hardware did seem to translate into refined flying. But the cidora is nothing to sneeze at either
One comment about the difference in the plastics. I have used 100's of different quadcopter bits that were 3d printed out of pla, petg, nylon, and tpu. In my experience, nylon is a good choice for parts that are going to need to protect things underneath them, such as canopies. But I have had tremendously better experience with tpu being the more resilient option in most cases. For example: I purchased 2 sets of the nylon kwad skids from rotor riot for my quads. Both ground away to nothing in no time flat. I began printing my own out of tpu, and I have not ground any of them away... Like, at all. The worst thing is the thin parts that screws pass through tend to stretch if they're not thick enough to not tear in crashes. If the tpu is more than 3-4mm thick, it would take a tremendous force to tear it. I'm also not saying that the Steele bits aren't as good or are worse than tpu. I'm simply saying that If the bits are designed well, tpu can last a much longer time on a quad than nylon, depending on the need. This is mostly FYI for you, Joshua, since I have 2+ years of 3d printing on you. PM me sometime and I'll happily swap info with you on all thing 3d printing/designing for quads, and I'll help you better understand what I mean. Keep up the amazing work! You're an invaluable addition to our awesome community!
all these kiss haters i've been flying kiss for 3 years now never had a kiss product fail on me i think the fails are coming from ppl who dont know how to build KISS products properly
Exactly.
Only kiss issues I have had were my own fault, or due to crash
@StaticMotion Agreed
Cough, cough...24:05!?!? 😂
@@DeeJayEll something in ya throat? like i said built by someone who doesn't know how to build KISS properly you don't know how this was built was the 4in1 filed out? doesn't look like it no caps, gummies, who knows i wasn't there but what i do know for me personally kiss has never failed me so idc what ppl say or whatever we all have our own opinions and this was mine
I been flying Betaflight for almost three years. And I hate the tunning trivia that goes into tunning different sizes of quads on Betaflight firmware. Dont get me wrong! Much respect for the Betaflight dev's and all the work they have done putting in new options so you can fine tune your quad even more than before..But on the same hand it has made tunning more difficult..At least for me it has..With that being said..I love building though..So recently i bought the new fettec 20x20 stack and activated the Kiss firmware on the FC & 2400 Shot on the Fettec esc. I haven't figured out the osd firmware yet for the DJI air unit. But I have flown the quad on stock pids. And I can say after flying Betaflight for nearly three years. The feel of Kiss firmware is something special. I cant wait to get the osd issue solved for the DJI because I'll be flying Kiss a lot😀
It definitely shows in the flight footage that Steeles quad done what you said. You hit lines in your garden that we rarely see you do haha
My catalysts machine works raging droner or slam nasty with t motor indestructible esc and motors can be built for almost half the price. I'm sure it's amazing but definitely aimed at newcomers. I love betaflight. Excellent video JB
So I randomly stumbled on your videos one day, I have a Mavic 2 zoom and that’s fine for what it is. I now want to shelf it and get a fpv quad.. great videos I watch hundreds of hours of multi rotor stuff and so far your top 2.
Diggin the quarantine beard J.B.! quarantine has proved to me that every guy looks better with more facial hair
We don't fly builds like these (we an in hubby and I) as we fly race builds for our freestyle ships and just tune them for a more freestyle-ish feel. We are so used to really light and very high powered builds and these heavy freestyle ships just don't appeal to us.
I gotta say this someone we know bought this Steele build a while back and i just flew it. I was shocked (we do fly true freestyle builds here and there) at just how amazingly crisp it flew. We are very used to having huge power on tap on the race type builds (we don't fly HD cams, we fly them just as we race them BUT with a much different tune) but was totally shocked at how a heavy build with a Gopro didn't seem like there was any lack of power. It's super locked when flying fast and low dancing through a pine tree farm.. It's super poppy off zero throttle, prop wash handling is superb (we have a lot of time on KISS from back in the day and KISS has always handled prop wash amazingly well even on tunes that aren't totally dialed) when really snapping it around and getting it in dirty air. Im sure some of how crisp the dirty air handling is has to do with number one the super low load props (he had S3s on it) along with KISS and 6s torque.. I can say this 100% this build flies AMAZINGLY but in NO WAY is it worth 900... I don't care the name behind it and how perfect it's built and so on and so forth.... Its a premium product and that it is but its a very over priced premium product.
If you want a world class flying quad out the box it is exactly that but again 300 dollars will buy you that all day long.
The only reason i can see buying this is that you want to support getfpv and Steele.. If you want to put some cash in to keeping the US hobby stores alive during bad times and help Steele then by all means buy it. We really do need to make sure the USA vendors are taken care of and putting some cash in to the pocket of a big name in the sport that helps draw in more people... For those reasons yes it's well worth 900 dollars but if your spending 900 and thinking that it flies better then anything else and its 900 because it's just worlds better then sometjkng you can build your self for 250 bucks then your wasting your money it is not that.
I'm still flying my 3 year old Mr Steele build. I built it myself from one of his very old videos. Burnt out 2 ecs. But other then that still has everything else original. Sadly there not allowed were I am now. Sooo playing with some 3inch stuff now.
Ok, it's 2022 and $900 for an analogue 5' is still insanely expensive, even with inflation!
Fourth or fifth time visiting, lots of good info, Don't let Mr steel make you jealious
Lol, that ending. For a minute there I felt like I was in a 90's stoner movie as the stereotypical "guy on the couch". Except, in the fridge... :')
Great vid. Was great to see your honest feedback on both. To expensive for me... but damn would love to try the Steele quad
So much great informations.
I was planning to build my own drone and u gave a good overwiev of the diffrend components.
Thx a lot, great work keep it going!
greetings from germany
I been flying the KISS 4in1 ESC pretty much since it first came out & can also say, never had that happen to kiss 4 in 1 (Well I have burned one but that was from my own up all night till 5am building stupidity 😂)... Unlucky there. As far as actual frame durability goes, Apex is the most durable frame I’ve ever flown. My prototype Apex test frame (I was one of the test pilots for ImpulseRC during the Apex development ) is still going strong for over a year of abuse now with nothing but the expected cosmetic grazes, chips, nicks and a bit of delamination damage to the tip of one of the front arms from smashing into a rock after diving from a cliff. Arm still structurally good even after that heavy impact (And prototype arms were actually a bit thinner & lighter than the final production version) I know my Alien arms wouldn’t have survived an impact like that and Alien was a tank. Apex is quite exceptional in the thought that’s been put into it, it’s very apparent when building it. Apex was designed around KISS Components & TBS 5v unify, the placement of that particular VTX isn’t a problem as it simply just plugs/unplugs to pigtail connecting it to the ImpulseOSD board behind the camera so top plate can easily be removed completely and out of the way. You missed that there are also strain relief holes either side of front bottom plate for extra xt60 placement options. I do understand you’re just comparing as they come in RTF form though. So in regards to that, I would agree in your conclusion that it would be insane for really anyone to spend $900 on an RTF. 99.99% of pilots shopping for an RTF have no need to spend that much & the rest of the market would just build it themselves. Though as a professional tradesmen in my day job, I think the $300 mark up difference you’re questioning is quite fair when you consider labour (time, effort & workmanship) costs in the USA compared to labour costs in China. I’m imagining the RTF Apex is built in-house by Get FPV staff and the iFlight built for peanuts in some Chinese factory. That’s probably worth a mention. Would really find it interesting to see you do an actual frame review & build of the Apex to you own specs and compare building & flying it to your favourite daily driver.
KrissKwadd ditto luv my hd apexes...hes gonna put betaflight in apex now n compare
@@flo-ridafpv5713 Would be good to see him do that indeed. Even better build from scratch. Yeah man, is such a good & fun frame to build out & appreciate the thought that went into it. Awesome to hear you're loving yours mate 👌
You're a legend, Joshua.
Very informational video as always!
Although I don't see too many situations where one would need to access the stack screws after the quad is fully built, unless one of the stack screws breaks. Covering the stack screws with the arms actually has an advantage imo, makes it impossible for the stack screw to loosen and back out