I've always thought the n64 version was gorgeous it just suffers from sound compression because it's on a cartridge unfortunately. The music in the ps1 version is amazing.
N64 is the first version released and has almost got every single feature Ubisoft intended to include in this version, similar to the PC version, which is the second one released, almost right after the N64 one. It has smudged textures thanks to the console's ability to render filtered textures, which helps for quality, but sometimes they kinda look out of place and bad, especially on bigger models. It has all the lums, of course, but lacks of minigames and secrets, and the characters speak Raymanian. The PS1 version, the 3rd release, was later developed with some cuts and additions, involving the voice acting that added 5 language dubs, some lines to more characters, the number of lums (from 1001 to 800. Razorback eats a red lum here.) and some redesigned parts of levels to fit in. Whoever collects all the lums is rewarded with a playable 2D beta of Rayman 2, exclusive to this version. The 4th release, the Dreamcast one, is an improved Rayman 2 with some enhanced aspects of gameplay, such as better models, 2D sprites being replaced by 3D models, a wider camera, more content and playable minigames. Pretty well acclaimed, but the Dreamcast had it's inevitable sad fate. The 5th one is Revolution, a PS2 port that includes all the Dreamcast features but also adds more minigames and level elements, including a free roaming map that works as a level selection hub. If you were forced with the PS1 and N64 versions, I'd say to try both. The PS2 version is by far the most reliable and better version.
It shows the strenghts and weaknesses of both systems. N64 got proper filtering and basically smoother frames. Playstation has speech samples and better textures. It got longer loading times and geometry wobbeling
Textures are the same, it is just the N64 puts them through multiple passes which smooths over the detail., the 3D modelling and stability is vastly stronger on N64 as it should be.
The N64 version also has a properly textured skybox whereas the PS1 version just used flat shading. A lot of PS1 games used the same for a sky because of the limited number of textured polygons that it could render.
The musics of ps1 are high quality that a cd is capable of, but you have to be honest that even the n64 soundtrack may be bad midi,limited to the ps1, but the soundtrack is still awesome in my opnion.
3:17 When Globox open his mouth, in n64 looks like it actually open his mouth, but in psx, it doesn't (He just instantly has his jaw open like it was a separated model)
JohnnyNismo I agree, imagine if Nintendo just made normal powerful hardware. If they had the dual shock design idea of dual analog sticks, they would've been unstoppable.
Every system is a series of compromises, because of cost, even the PSX. The N64 had more expensive chips and more and faster ram. To stay within a reasonable budget you can't add a cd drive too. Carts cost more, but load super fast and are very durable. I have one N64 cart that ever game me trouble, and a decent size handful of PSX cds.
Honestly id agree, and I did for soo long. But i saw a video on why they used carts, its alot more than just loading times. The games could have saved core object changes on the cart itself the CD couldnt rewrite itself, and was limited to just the memory card. Also becuase of thing and a 1, 2 other advantage they were able to upscale becaus eof the read speed, frames were alot better per sec, and the environments were huge and open, CD's at the time were limited to loading small areas that couldnt be rewritten. It made games like zelda impossible on ps1 even with lower graphics, the draw distance would always be very limited. It was a good mix, i honestly wish they just upped from 64mb carts to at least 128. So games like Vagrant Story for ps1 are full RPG's but only take 84MB would have been more possible for n64. I loved RPG's so this was a bummer for me so i just stayed with my SNES.
Supermitsa James True the N64 has much better gameplay. I still prefer the PC/Dreamcast over them both though. PSX has the highest quality soundtrack according to the Rayman forums and thats how they got wav/flac files from it.
i take n64 over ps1, because the seamless transition between gameplay and cutscene sure it lack much more better sound and voice acting at the intro, and during cutscenes (and debatable background better color/textures) but choosing Better 3d rendering and seamless transition ,stable fps, doesn't seem bad isn't it?
n64 looks cleaner, higher screen resolution, but colours are more diverse and vivid on ps1 , also texture quality is higher on ps1, sound and music is better on ps1, but n64 has the edge in this game cos of missing content in ps1 version.
And also the ps1 version has good voice acting and larger and more diverse spoken dialogue because the ps1 discs have larger digital spaces when compared to n64 cartridges
the only reason most N64 games look terrible is because programming games for it was a pain in the ass and not easy to understand. quite a shame that so much potential was lost because of this
The gap in time between the PS1's release date and the N64 is about 19 months. The gap between N64 and Dreamcast was 29 months. Considering this, N64 is a bit better than PS1 at some things and worse at others, but MASSIVELY inferior to Dreamcast at everything. That about sums up the N64's lack of advancement to draw gamers away from Playstation. This game on Dreamcast runs at 60FPS for a start, it annihilates the N64 version. I remember it fondly.
N64 wins, obviously, and with the Expansion Pak, the game looks even better. I think the music sounds slightly better on the N64, but it's also good on PS1. However, the voices on the PS1 version bother me so much, they don't sound good at all, I don't know why people keep mentioning them as a positive for the PS1, the gibberish of the N64 sounds more fitting to be honest.
Wow... Ly's voice on PS1 is atrocious. She sounds like just some normal girl, while she has an echoey mysterious voice on N64 which is way more fitting for her. It doesn't help that the voice acting is kinda bad too. Yeah, I really hate the voices of the PS1 version.
The N64 is a much more powerful system. With a good developer it's games look way beyond what PS1 can provide. Rayman 2 on N64 runs at 640x480, features larger levels, more polygons, faster framerate, higher detailed textures and anti aliasing. PS1 version runs at 320x240, no AA, features smaller levels, less polygons. It is a technical marvel on PS1.
liveswired Enter the Dreamcast, with a good developer, games can look really good, had the best ports of PSX and N64 games like Rayman 2, 16MB of RAM and 8VRAM, plus the same benefits of CD tech and others
That's a bit unfair since the dreamcast has an extra 3 years of technology on the N64 and 5 on the PS1... It sits uncomfortably in the middle of two console generations, which probably contributed to it's downfall since it very quickly had to compete against the PS2, gamecube, and Xbox, all of which made it look rather weak...
Jean-Philippe Bélanger gamecube also didnt really end up that well, mainly ps2 and xbox owned that generation, in de end: 1. ps2 2. xbox 3. gamecube 4. dreamcast
La Nintendo 64 para el momento de su salida era muy potente, pero Nintendo La cagó con los cartuchos. Fue Cómo lanzar un Ferrari con ruedas de bicicleta y al final eso le terminó pasando mucha factura.
Eu amo como os visuais nos jogos de 64 são darks. Enfim, 64 tem modelos muito mais poligonais e bem animados alem de uma resolução bem superior, só peca nos audios o que é de se esperar devido as limitações dos cartuchos
N64:better graphics,resolution, fps, Ps1:better music, voices, high texture Errors:n64 doesn't have the extra rayman 2 beta music, the soundtrack is made in midi(looks good in my opnion). Errorrs in ps1:the areas are too short, the last boss was too easy, low fps, lowest resolution, errors of animation. To be honest i kinda like the ps1 graphics type and also n64. But i think the dreamcast literally passed them, because he is a literal hybrid of the both 1. Dreamcast 2. N64 3. Ps1
I never had the game for N64. I didn't know the 64 version actually reached 60fps here and there. I had the DS version which stumbled between 15-30fps, and the Dreamcast version at a rock-solid 60fps.
Eu tive a oportunidade de jogar TODAS as versões, fiz até comparações! Quando achar, eu posto o link. Mas como a comparação em questão é entre o Nintendo 64 e Ps1, posso dizer o seguinte. A unica coisa que é superior no Ps1 é a trilha sonora, visto que ela é arranjada e todos os personagens foram dublados. Mas em compensação, os gráficos desta versão são bem piores, com cores mais chapadas, muito serrilhado, texturas mais simples e a taxa de poligonos é bem mais baixa. O level design desta versão é como se fosse um "resumo", pois várias partes foram cortadas, tudo foi muito "compressado", sem contar que algumas fases foram deletadas. Mas é impressionante ver esse jogo rodando no PS1, eles fizeram um ótimo port. Já no Nintendo 64, as musicas são piores. Porém, os gráficos são muito melhores, com cores super vivas, texturas mais detalhadas, anti-aliasing, etc... Sem contar que o Level design é diferente da versão do Ps1, sendo as fases mais longas e mais completas. Enfim, esperava-se que esse jogo fosse melhor nesta plataforma, já que ele foi desenvolvido inicialmente para a mesma. Seria legal fazer uma comparação entre a versão do Ps2 e Dreamcast! :)
De Fato o Nintendo 64 quando era bem Programado esse Sim Fazia Gráficos Muito Melhores que o Psx ao Contrario de um Certo outro Console Por aí, Digo em 3D rsrsrs
A unica coisa que N64 ganha é no grafico, no audio e trilhas sonoras os cartuchos do n64 eram muito ultrapassados e nao tinhao poder para trilha sonoras nem vozes o som dele é um lixo. E outra, ps1 venceu a geração disparado né amigo. Playstation nunca precisou de grafico, e mesmo assim venceu a maioria das gerações
@@rodrigoro8242 Pirataria não entra em contagem amigo, as empresas não tem como contarem cópias feitas, são números contabilizados com base nos discos originais.
You do realize the N64 is becoming the real collectors item and many of the game are still talked about extensively today. For example goldeneye is still toted as a quantum leap in the evolution of FPS that most FPS are still building on today. Zelda Ocarina of Time is still often referred to as the best RPG ever made. Mario 64 well Mario games have become legend in there own right. Mario Kart is often still included in lists of best racing games of all time. None of the games you have listed comes close to the popularity of man of the N64 game. That is not to say that there bad games but just pointing out how inaccurate your comment it about the N64 being forgotten. If anything it is considerably more desirable now over the PS1 than when they were both still in production.
do you notice you are arguing about something that depends on personal opinions mostly? HERE, and I hence HERE wins N64, OP DID NOT SAY ANYTHING about global terms, just HERE, N64 looks better that's all. Both consoles are really nice, no need to argue on ANYTHING. Kids today are HATEFUL.
***** We are here to talk about the video, and in the video N64 blows psx out of the water, that's all, no need to start talking about catalog or nonsenses like a kid (you). But hey, for example in others like resident evil 2 I'd say the psx version is better. There is just no way to come here and blame one console or the other, you can just enjoy both.
Shut up and if he's right? The only thing I should not talk about is you, why do not you disappear from youtube, oh why the only thing you know how to do is talk nonsense lol that stupid
@@agentt657 No... that's 60. Only the playermodels are at 20-30fps for more intensive action, the PS1 just runs everything at 20-30fps. Look at the camera.
A Versão do Nintendo 64 é bem melhor o.O, os modelos possuem uma movimentação mais suave e não são tão quadrados, ele possui menor serrilhados ( e menos ainda com o Expession Pack que aumenta a resolução ), os personagens nem mechem a boca pra falar na versão do PS1 xD sem duvidas a versão do N64 é muito melhor.
Personally, the PS2 version is my overall favourite version of Rayman 2 - although that's the most broken version, I love how it has the hub world, the shop, the bonus stages, more strategy, and extra things like being able to do a rain dance. But if I was to choose between these two, I would pick the N64 version! - the PS1 version has a lot of missing content
I hate how he shoots though. Even with both hands he shoots slow and it kills the enjoyment for me. I own ps1. 64 (I had this one first in 2000) and 3ds and dream cast versions. The ps2 one was best but it destroyed the combat for me.
@@squallthegriever The PS2 version actually requires you to upgrade Rayman's combat abilities. He starts firing slow energy shots but if you upgrade him then he will fire shots in a much faster pace
It boggles the mind how they took a game from the N64, ported it to superior hardware, and somehow managed to make the game _worse._ At least Rayman Revolution finally did the game proper justice on the Sony side.
@@toad8840 can you tell me why? I'm learning about computers currently My guess is the fact that the N64 compensate with slightly larger ram and a 99 MHz processor
@@zalternative1 The PSX version could've easily been a straight port had they compressed the audio and went with the gibberish instead of fully recorded voice lines for everything. Might've needed more loading seams between areas but it would've been possible
I liked the vocal work from n64. Played it as a kid eons ago so I'm not sure if it is legit a foreign language or just made up gibberish. Not speaking English I think added to the experience rather than detracted. It makes you feel more emersed in a world with it's own language vastly different from your own.
Esse era o típico jogo com a cara do N64! Tipo Zelda Donkey Kong, Mario 64, Get Force Gemini, Banjo Kazooie e outros! Era muito difícil vencer nesse estilo o Nintendo 64 nessa época! Mesmo com versões feitas depois para outras plataformas ainda assim não conseguiam fazer igual!
The VA might have been made specifically for the PS1 version (which was developed after the Dreamcast version). The Dreamcast version was much more of a straight port and didnt have significant additions, or in the Playstation's case, cut content.
Conor Rynne Very true. I think Sony requested voice acting for the PS1 port of Rayman 2. They had to find some way of making it special. I just wish they had all the level designs, music tracks, and lums present in the N64 and DC versions.
The Dreamcast port is based on the PC version which came out just a month from the original n64 released so there where no voice acting up until that point. I prefer the made up voices because it gives it more atmosphere and the voice acting is pretty cringy tbh
Man, I had no idea there was an N64 version! I was a playstation baby and grew up in the mid 90's, but man this game was a fever dream, and a good one too. Thanks for putting so much effort with this comparison dude!
Ray Man 2 was one of the few games that wasn't adversely effected by the trilinear filtering of the N64 which resulted in excess blurriness to the textures. I think the textures did not fit the filtering right in other games that had excess blurriness. While in theory tri-linear filtering was suppose to clean out textures from pixels, instead blurred them to the point where pixels were more preferable.
Samuel Morales Yea, the N65 had a terrible texture cache (the Saturn had over 250 pixel for the textures) but there was no filtering, then the PC and Dreamcast comes and blows N64 to its grave with texture filtering AND high quality textures
The textures simply lack resolution in general, it's not the texture filtering. Meanwhile the PS1 usually can't even do one of the most basic of basics of 3d graphics properly (perspective correct texture mapping.) Still, the N64 has a reprogrammable graphics chip, and could have turned all of those features such as trilinear filtering, antialiasing (yes, it had antialiasing) and so on off, but Nintendo didn't let anyone do that. The trick to n64 games not looking blurry is more complex than texture filtering. - You can see it in the later games such as Rebel Strike and Conker's bad fur day; The developers reprogrammed the system to handle textures differently, which resulted in considerably more texture detail onscreen. Turning off the texture filtering wouldn't have made n64 games any more detailed, it would have just made them seriously pixellated.
Why there are so significant Changes in Details, for exaample: When Globox is brought to his cell the Prison Cell Door is wooden, in the N64 Versions there are Lasers. why? Even little Things are changed.
impresionante como la versión de Nintendo 64 es prácticamente la versión del Dreamcast pero corriendo en 480i en lugar de 480p en dc. Parece más un juego de siguiente generación y un logro en ambas consolas aunque me guste más la versión DC . Pero acá es obvio que gana N64
I know the version of PS1 is not the best and I know several levels were removed. But I cannot not prefer it, it was the first game that introduced me to a game with a story that was not an excuse and I liked that the characters speak in my languague (Spanish) and not make simple noises. You could skip the tutorials and scenes if you did not want to see them again. The music is great, I like the scenes of the guardians of the masks; It gives a reason for why they attack Rayman.
To me Rayman 1 was the son of Super MARIO world and odyssey world. Rayman 2 was then the master of the platform action genre and to me the superior of all platformers during the mascot platform era.
The water looks a lot better on the N64 than PlayStation. ONly thing I really like about the PS1 version more is the music. I do KIND OF like the English voices.
Wow, even the sound is better on the 64...that's really sad. I mean, the graphics on the 64 was expected, but when the cartodge system is doing better than CD, something's gone wrong. Resident Evil 2 was like this as well.
Ubisoft did an amazing job on all consoles. The PS1 version is brutal for 1995 hardware, but the N64 version is very close to the level of a PC Master Race of the time. Amazing!
1999 huh. You'd wonder why Conker's bad fur day is so exceptional in having full voice acting on the N64... I mean, sure it relies on mp3 decompression and the use of a 512 megabit cartridge, but did no-one else even consider it? Come to think of it, late Rare titles (1999-2001 or so) ALL had full voice acting... Perfect dark even has more than 30 minutes of fully voice acted cutscenes you can play from it's menu (plus in-level dialogue)... It's not impossible, but I guess it either didn't occur to anyone, or they didn't feel like trying... Or... Something...
playstation looks better with more vibrant colors and sharper texture. the 3d models look better on the n64 with anti-aliasing, sound and music is better on the playstation.
Simplemente los graficos de Nintendo 64 son superiores...No solo por la calidad de las texturas...El frame-rate de 64 es superior...El numero de poligonos de PS1 es inestable...
La estabilidad poligonal es clave para la experiencia de los plataformas 3d, y en ese aspecto el ps1 nunca pudo superar al primer juego Mario 64, ya en otros tipos de juego play 1 pudo competir e incluso mejorar al Nintendo 64 , como juegos con una carga poligonal grande como figthings o carreras, debido a que el procesador gráfico del play 1 era muy bruto y potente, podía pegar más "fuerte", mientras que el de 64 era más sofisticado y su potencia se expresaba en el "trazado fino", es decir "efectos": como el corrector de perspectivas, el antia leasing, la estabilidad, los diferentes filtros.
To be fair, the N64 was the system the game was designed for in the first place. It was exclusive to the N64 for quite while and ports to other systems only came into the picture months later. It's obvious the Dreamcast version is the best but it's also a console from a whole different generation.
If anything the PC port is the ultimate version of the original Rayman 2. The dreamcast version has enough changed in it to be like a version 2 of the game (enemy placement and stage hazards are changed around) but without as vast differences as the psx version
Digipad controls in 3D platformers are worse than tank controls in Resident Evil. I need my analog stick for these games. N64 automatically beats PS1 in everything that has 3D gameplay because of the better controls.
I'd say the N64 ver wins. Graphics are much smoother than the PS1 ver. Plus the animation is alot smoother as well. Although, that might because of the expansion pak. But still.
For some reason I like it better when they talk in complete gibberish than when they are fully voices. Voice acting is Rayman 3 was awesome though, Murfy, Andre and Globox were all funny as fuck.
The N64 version uses simple giberish which sounds better compared to the voice acting of the other version and the N64 version has larger levels than the PlayStation game and better graphics. Overall the N64 original is the best version of the game right behind the Dreamcast version.
I always thought graphics wise N64 was completely superior but watching this it's much smoother and characters and seems to have much more polygons but the textures are better on PS1 wow
Eu só zerei a versão de ps1, ela foi feita na Ubisoft da China ou Singapura, acho. Tem muita coisa cortada, como fases e alguns elementos do jogo em geral (como o Murphy). Acho um bom port, mas a melhor versão ainda é a Revolution do DC/PS2.
Nobody's even mentioning the amount of animations in the PS version that are not present in the N64 version. I guess they're pretending not to see them.
I'll give the N64 a pass this time. The N64 version looks better than the PlayStation version (I remember renting the N64 version in 1999 years before buying the Dreamcast version and I played the PlayStation version at a hotel in Anaheim back in 2002). However, the PlayStation sounds better due to it's CD quality soundtrack.
Wasn't this written for the N64 first? They obviously had to scale it back quite a bit to run on the PSX. Interestingly some of the PSX wall textures look better but that's about the best thing I can say about it really. The skyboxes are little better on the PSX too I think.
Franco Crurdz es básicamente la versión Dreamcast pero sin música calidad CD y en un cartucho de 32 megabytes (256 megabits), el juego funciona en la máxima resolución de la Nintendo 64 que es de 640x480i lo cual es impresionante, y puede igualar a la versión DC sin el VGA activo (480p60fps) . Realmente parece un juego de 6ta generación más que de 5ta
@@Reptil1988 El brillo mayor en PS1 es para ocultar la falta de efectos graficos y la paleta de colores reducida del sistema. Y lo de las voces es limitacion de espacio es un cartucho de 32MB comparado a un CD de 700MB. En N64 hay mucha mejor calidad grafica,mas poligonos,escenarios mas grandes,sin tiempos de carga,incluye mas contenido siendo 1000 esferas en N64 y 800 en PS1. Y ademas mucha mayor resolucion con Expansion Pak y Anti Aliashing y filtrados de texturas. En PS1 ademas de reducirse en contenido y graficos tambien se redujo en resolucion siendo 280x240i.
Es obvio que la N64 manejaba mas poligonos, es un sistema de 64 bits, pero el resultado de la PS1 es mas satisfactorio, como dije. El CD permito mayor calidad de texturas, audio de mejor calidad y sobre todo VOCES en español. La PS1 disimulaba mejor la falta de poligonos, algo que que en este juego no supieron aprovechar bien.
@@Reptil1988 Amigo la version de PS1 solo soporta mejor calidad sonora,las texturas son de muy baja calidad comparada a las demas versiones,y los bits no equivale a mejor manejo de poligonos en el sistema. La Xbox es de 32bits y maneja mucha mayor calidad y cantidad de poligonos que la PS2 que es de 128bits. Y lo de las voces es lo unico que tiene mejor respecto a N64,aunque es una minoria puesto que en N64 hay mas contenido jugable,aunque eso ya va por gustos.
Because of large space in the media, PS version has dubbed voices and larger textures. The advantages ends here. The horse power of N64 make the elements move smoothly, while in PSX, everything shakes (textures, polygons, it's distortion everywhere). And this is valid for ALL 3d games on N64 and PSX. In other words, N64 calculates the things more smoothly and precise. PSX is like playing an earthquake. Still, a few games managed to look good on PSX, but the lack of elegance processing polygons, makes ALL games on n64 less nauseating than in PSX. I'm talking only about graphics, clearly, Sony made market decisions that helped the PSX beat n64 in sales (when Nintendo discontinued the N64, sales numbers were 32 million N64 vs 72 million PSX. After this, PSX managed to sell above 100 million consoles. But to be honest, despite of having absolute classics like FF VII, Symphony of the Night, or Metal Gear Solid, PSX games aged worse than N64 games. It's easy to observe that, any lists of best of all time, we always find 3, 4 N64 games between the Top 10, and not a single one of PSX in the lists. GoldenEye was fantastic, Perfect Dark managed to have a so gorgeous and complex multiplayer, that no game until 2018 managed to overcome. You can configure absolutely everything and build the most insane, fun and deep matches in any FPS game in history. Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time share the throne as the best games of all time in any serious list.
I've always thought the n64 version was gorgeous it just suffers from sound compression because it's on a cartridge unfortunately. The music in the ps1 version is amazing.
I also just don't understand the changes made in the ps1 version. The shorter levels and English voice acting are oddballs for me.
No it's Rayman Revolution os PS2.@neogeomaster3027
N64 is the first version released and has almost got every single feature Ubisoft intended to include in this version, similar to the PC version, which is the second one released, almost right after the N64 one.
It has smudged textures thanks to the console's ability to render filtered textures, which helps for quality, but sometimes they kinda look out of place and bad, especially on bigger models. It has all the lums, of course, but lacks of minigames and secrets, and the characters speak Raymanian.
The PS1 version, the 3rd release, was later developed with some cuts and additions, involving the voice acting that added 5 language dubs, some lines to more characters, the number of lums (from 1001 to 800. Razorback eats a red lum here.) and some redesigned parts of levels to fit in. Whoever collects all the lums is rewarded with a playable 2D beta of Rayman 2, exclusive to this version.
The 4th release, the Dreamcast one, is an improved Rayman 2 with some enhanced aspects of gameplay, such as better models, 2D sprites being replaced by 3D models, a wider camera, more content and playable minigames. Pretty well acclaimed, but the Dreamcast had it's inevitable sad fate.
The 5th one is Revolution, a PS2 port that includes all the Dreamcast features but also adds more minigames and level elements, including a free roaming map that works as a level selection hub.
If you were forced with the PS1 and N64 versions, I'd say to try both. The PS2 version is by far the most reliable and better version.
It shows the strenghts and weaknesses of both systems.
N64 got proper filtering and basically smoother frames.
Playstation has speech samples and better textures. It got longer loading times and geometry wobbeling
Textures are the same, it is just the N64 puts them through multiple passes which smooths over the detail., the 3D modelling and stability is vastly stronger on N64 as it should be.
The N64 backgrounds are blurry unlike PS1 only thing that looks about better on PS1
The N64 version also has a properly textured skybox whereas the PS1 version just used flat shading. A lot of PS1 games used the same for a sky because of the limited number of textured polygons that it could render.
Yeah u can tell in the animations the texture wobblings
The musics of ps1 are high quality that a cd is capable of, but you have to be honest that even the n64 soundtrack may be bad midi,limited to the ps1, but the soundtrack is still awesome in my opnion.
I actually think that the voices in the n64 are much funnier than the ps1
The voices aren't realistic, that's why. They're made to sound cute and funny.
Agreed
@@TS-yz3ud Exactly
Yes but PS1 more cinematic I pretend graphics are same N64 on PS1 version whitch Uni Soft changed too much.
had this game on my n64. the graphics got 10 out of 10 in all magazines at the time.
3:17 When Globox open his mouth, in n64 looks like it actually open his mouth, but in psx, it doesn't (He just instantly has his jaw open like it was a separated model)
Yeah, Also when he speaks, his mouth doesnt move in the ps1 version. In the N64, his jaw opens a bit like hes talking
It looks icky when he does it in the PS1 version.
The N64 would have been DOPE if it had been a CD system. Nintendo is always fuggin' the obvious things up.
JohnnyNismo I agree, imagine if Nintendo just made normal powerful hardware. If they had the dual shock design idea of dual analog sticks, they would've been unstoppable.
Every system is a series of compromises, because of cost, even the PSX. The N64 had more expensive chips and more and faster ram. To stay within a reasonable budget you can't add a cd drive too. Carts cost more, but load super fast and are very durable. I have one N64 cart that ever game me trouble, and a decent size handful of PSX cds.
Honestly id agree, and I did for soo long. But i saw a video on why they used carts, its alot more than just loading times. The games could have saved core object changes on the cart itself the CD couldnt rewrite itself, and was limited to just the memory card. Also becuase of thing and a 1, 2 other advantage they were able to upscale becaus eof the read speed, frames were alot better per sec, and the environments were huge and open, CD's at the time were limited to loading small areas that couldnt be rewritten. It made games like zelda impossible on ps1 even with lower graphics, the draw distance would always be very limited. It was a good mix, i honestly wish they just upped from 64mb carts to at least 128. So games like Vagrant Story for ps1 are full RPG's but only take 84MB would have been more possible for n64. I loved RPG's so this was a bummer for me so i just stayed with my SNES.
psx has better music but n64 wins in graphics
I like playstation 😊
Supermitsa James True the N64 has much better gameplay. I still prefer the PC/Dreamcast over them both though.
PSX has the highest quality soundtrack according to the Rayman forums and thats how they got wav/flac files from it.
I like both of the music versions of ps1 and n64. The n64 beats in midi(my favorite) while ps1 has the best high quality instruments.
i take n64 over ps1, because the seamless transition between gameplay and cutscene
sure it lack much more better sound and voice acting at the intro, and during cutscenes (and debatable background better color/textures)
but choosing Better 3d rendering and seamless transition ,stable fps, doesn't seem bad isn't it?
n64 looks cleaner, higher screen resolution, but colours are more diverse and vivid on ps1 , also texture quality is higher on ps1, sound and music is better on ps1, but n64 has the edge in this game cos of missing content in ps1 version.
And also the ps1 version has good voice acting and larger and more diverse spoken dialogue because the ps1 discs have larger digital spaces when compared to n64 cartridges
PS1 version sometimes looks too bright.
The PlayStation version has the original 2D Rayman 2 game unlocked by finding missing looms.
The ps1 levels are shorter, maybe because of space to put the voice quality voices, textures, music and etc
Astonishing difference, the N64 was an absolute powerhouse by comparison.
the only reason most N64 games look terrible is because programming games for it was a pain in the ass and not easy to understand. quite a shame that so much potential was lost because of this
@@arachnidplays6162 A lot of it was down to a very small texture cache
The gap in time between the PS1's release date and the N64 is about 19 months. The gap between N64 and Dreamcast was 29 months. Considering this, N64 is a bit better than PS1 at some things and worse at others, but MASSIVELY inferior to Dreamcast at everything. That about sums up the N64's lack of advancement to draw gamers away from Playstation. This game on Dreamcast runs at 60FPS for a start, it annihilates the N64 version. I remember it fondly.
N64 wins, obviously, and with the Expansion Pak, the game looks even better. I think the music sounds slightly better on the N64, but it's also good on PS1. However, the voices on the PS1 version bother me so much, they don't sound good at all, I don't know why people keep mentioning them as a positive for the PS1, the gibberish of the N64 sounds more fitting to be honest.
Wow... Ly's voice on PS1 is atrocious. She sounds like just some normal girl, while she has an echoey mysterious voice on N64 which is way more fitting for her. It doesn't help that the voice acting is kinda bad too. Yeah, I really hate the voices of the PS1 version.
@@pikachu896 The voices aren't that bad in the PS1 port. But Rayman does sound better on the N64. For example, his scream, and cheering.
The N64 is a much more powerful system. With a good developer it's games look way beyond what PS1 can provide. Rayman 2 on N64 runs at 640x480, features larger levels, more polygons, faster framerate, higher detailed textures and anti aliasing. PS1 version runs at 320x240, no AA, features smaller levels, less polygons. It is a technical marvel on PS1.
liveswired Enter the Dreamcast, with a good developer, games can look really good, had the best ports of PSX and N64 games like Rayman 2, 16MB of RAM and 8VRAM, plus the same benefits of CD tech and others
That's a bit unfair since the dreamcast has an extra 3 years of technology on the N64 and 5 on the PS1...
It sits uncomfortably in the middle of two console generations, which probably contributed to it's downfall since it very quickly had to compete against the PS2, gamecube, and Xbox, all of which made it look rather weak...
Jean-Philippe Bélanger gamecube also didnt really end up that well, mainly ps2 and xbox owned that generation, in de end:
1. ps2
2. xbox
3. gamecube
4. dreamcast
Ok it looks better on the N64 but on a CRT 240P looks better that 480i IMO. watch?v=EJ7qlI3-l7Q Next compare Wipeout LOL
2 years dude. DC came out in Japan in 1998
6:46 "She likes to hang out around here"
*awkward pause*
"Have you seen her?"
¿Cómo carajos le hicieron para qué se vea tan bien en la 64?
Sé que esl audio está más comprimido, pero igual es un trabajo asombroso 😱❤️
La N64 simplemente era una bestia en su época.
@@oreo3000 la N64 La máquina de la Diversión
La Nintendo 64 para el momento de su salida era muy potente, pero Nintendo La cagó con los cartuchos. Fue Cómo lanzar un Ferrari con ruedas de bicicleta y al final eso le terminó pasando mucha factura.
The PS1 version makes the N64 version look like it has Battlefield graphics.
Prick Grimes LOL
+You Lost your 10 sec of life With reading this ...Yes. That's the joke.
PS1 underrated don't know why Ubi Soft cut some of it down when it had bigger capacity in CD.
PlayStation has full audios, but Nintendo 64 has better graphics. But the best version is Dreamcast version
PS1 also has less levels, shorter levels and less collectables. The voice acting is it's only pro but it doesn't do it against all those cons.
I don't know why there aren't voices in Dreamcast version if Dreamcast uses GD-ROM, which has 1.2 GB capacity.
More than a CD, that has 700MB capacity
What about PS2?
I haven't played this version.
Eu amo como os visuais nos jogos de 64 são darks. Enfim, 64 tem modelos muito mais poligonais e bem animados alem de uma resolução bem superior, só peca nos audios o que é de se esperar devido as limitações dos cartuchos
N64 Wins this, but the Dreamcast version is the best. Just stick with the PC version if you can't find a good Dreamcast and a copy of the game
Dont I need windows 95 or something?
@@mariodelrio2387 Modern re releases like on uPlay and GOG get the game easily working on Windows 7 and 10
Both versions still look incredible however the N64 still looks superior due to being around 3x more powerful.
Worse audio, textures, lighting. But better filtering, antialiasing, and load times.
the intro voice on the ps1 gave me chills
I like the n64 version better that's the one I grew up with
PS1 sold more because it was better but N64 had better graphics and bit more content.
N64:better graphics,resolution, fps,
Ps1:better music, voices, high texture
Errors:n64 doesn't have the extra rayman 2 beta music, the soundtrack is made in midi(looks good in my opnion).
Errorrs in ps1:the areas are too short, the last boss was too easy, low fps, lowest resolution, errors of animation.
To be honest i kinda like the ps1 graphics type and also n64.
But i think the dreamcast literally passed them, because he is a literal hybrid of the both
1. Dreamcast
2. N64
3. Ps1
I never had the game for N64. I didn't know the 64 version actually reached 60fps here and there.
I had the DS version which stumbled between 15-30fps, and the Dreamcast version at a rock-solid 60fps.
Eu tive a oportunidade de jogar TODAS as versões, fiz até comparações! Quando achar, eu posto o link.
Mas como a comparação em questão é entre o Nintendo 64 e Ps1, posso dizer o seguinte.
A unica coisa que é superior no Ps1 é a trilha sonora, visto que ela é arranjada e todos os personagens foram dublados. Mas em compensação, os gráficos desta versão são bem piores, com cores mais chapadas, muito serrilhado, texturas mais simples e a taxa de poligonos é bem mais baixa.
O level design desta versão é como se fosse um "resumo", pois várias partes foram cortadas, tudo foi muito "compressado", sem contar que algumas fases foram deletadas. Mas é impressionante ver esse jogo rodando no PS1, eles fizeram um ótimo port.
Já no Nintendo 64, as musicas são piores. Porém, os gráficos são muito melhores, com cores super vivas, texturas mais detalhadas, anti-aliasing, etc... Sem contar que o Level design é diferente da versão do Ps1, sendo as fases mais longas e mais completas. Enfim, esperava-se que esse jogo fosse melhor nesta plataforma, já que ele foi desenvolvido inicialmente para a mesma.
Seria legal fazer uma comparação entre a versão do Ps2 e Dreamcast! :)
De Fato o Nintendo 64 quando era bem Programado esse Sim Fazia Gráficos Muito Melhores que o Psx ao Contrario de um Certo outro Console Por aí, Digo em 3D rsrsrs
A unica coisa que N64 ganha é no grafico, no audio e trilhas sonoras os cartuchos do n64 eram muito ultrapassados e nao tinhao poder para trilha sonoras nem vozes o som dele é um lixo. E outra, ps1 venceu a geração disparado né amigo. Playstation nunca precisou de grafico, e mesmo assim venceu a maioria das gerações
Killer7 isso depende...no final da vida..os jogos N64 já estavam mto avançados...conker e por exemplo tinha até músicas cantadas e era tdo dublado
@@gattiweslley1076 3por 10kkkk venceu por causa da pirataria
@@rodrigoro8242 Pirataria não entra em contagem amigo, as empresas não tem como contarem cópias feitas, são números contabilizados com base nos discos originais.
There's no contest here N64 destroys PlayStation.
Playstation has a free beach ball.
You do realize the N64 is becoming the real collectors item and many of the game are still talked about extensively today. For example goldeneye is still toted as a quantum leap in the evolution of FPS that most FPS are still building on today. Zelda Ocarina of Time is still often referred to as the best RPG ever made. Mario 64 well Mario games have become legend in there own right. Mario Kart is often still included in lists of best racing games of all time. None of the games you have listed comes close to the popularity of man of the N64 game. That is not to say that there bad games but just pointing out how inaccurate your comment it about the N64 being forgotten. If anything it is considerably more desirable now over the PS1 than when they were both still in production.
do you notice you are arguing about something that depends on personal opinions mostly?
HERE, and I hence HERE wins N64, OP DID NOT SAY ANYTHING about global terms, just HERE, N64 looks better that's all.
Both consoles are really nice, no need to argue on ANYTHING.
Kids today are HATEFUL.
***** We are here to talk about the video, and in the video N64 blows psx out of the water, that's all, no need to start talking about catalog or nonsenses like a kid (you).
But hey, for example in others like resident evil 2 I'd say the psx version is better. There is just no way to come here and blame one console or the other, you can just enjoy both.
Shut up and if he's right? The only thing I should not talk about is you, why do not you disappear from youtube, oh why the only thing you know how to do is talk nonsense lol that stupid
Gotta love the 15fps in the PS1 Cutscenes
and 20 fps in N64 gameplay
@@agentt657 No... that's 60. Only the playermodels are at 20-30fps for more intensive action, the PS1 just runs everything at 20-30fps. Look at the camera.
@@dantemajasi-reed1229 N64 is only 30.
@@agentt657 The framerate does not get better in the gameplay of the PS1 version, whether you like it or not.
@@TS-yz3ud nope Rayman 2s gameplay is rocksteady 30 :)
N64 version was what me and my brother used to play. Too us it is the best because of the fond memories we had with it.
A Versão do Nintendo 64 é bem melhor o.O, os modelos possuem uma movimentação mais suave e não são tão quadrados, ele possui menor serrilhados ( e menos ainda com o Expession Pack que aumenta a resolução ), os personagens nem mechem a boca pra falar na versão do PS1 xD sem duvidas a versão do N64 é muito melhor.
Personally, the PS2 version is my overall favourite version of Rayman 2 - although that's the most broken version, I love how it has the hub world, the shop, the bonus stages, more strategy, and extra things like being able to do a rain dance. But if I was to choose between these two, I would pick the N64 version! - the PS1 version has a lot of missing content
I hate how he shoots though. Even with both hands he shoots slow and it kills the enjoyment for me. I own ps1. 64 (I had this one first in 2000) and 3ds and dream cast versions. The ps2 one was best but it destroyed the combat for me.
@@squallthegriever The PS2 version actually requires you to upgrade Rayman's combat abilities. He starts firing slow energy shots but if you upgrade him then he will fire shots in a much faster pace
@@REALMARCHINADER it's just his second hand and it still isnt as fast and smooth as the other games. I already maxed his stats in the game.
It boggles the mind how they took a game from the N64, ported it to superior hardware, and somehow managed to make the game _worse._ At least Rayman Revolution finally did the game proper justice on the Sony side.
This is the 1st time I’ve seen a comparison video with left and right audio playing at the same time, I like it!
The N64 version is only 32 MB(!).
Hard to imagine I know...
@@toad8840 can you tell me why? I'm learning about computers currently
My guess is the fact that the N64 compensate with slightly larger ram and a 99 MHz processor
@@zalternative1 The PSX version could've easily been a straight port had they compressed the audio and went with the gibberish instead of fully recorded voice lines for everything. Might've needed more loading seams between areas but it would've been possible
I love the ps1 but this really shows the extra power the 64 had.
I liked the vocal work from n64. Played it as a kid eons ago so I'm not sure if it is legit a foreign language or just made up gibberish. Not speaking English I think added to the experience rather than detracted. It makes you feel more emersed in a world with it's own language vastly different from your own.
Esse era o típico jogo com a cara do N64! Tipo Zelda Donkey Kong, Mario 64, Get Force Gemini, Banjo Kazooie e outros! Era muito difícil vencer nesse estilo o Nintendo 64 nessa época! Mesmo com versões feitas depois para outras plataformas ainda assim não conseguiam fazer igual!
PS1 version had VA but the Dreamcast port didnt ? that's really odd, than again I dont mind the Banjo Kazooie approach to it.
The VA might have been made specifically for the PS1 version (which was developed after the Dreamcast version). The Dreamcast version was much more of a straight port and didnt have significant additions, or in the Playstation's case, cut content.
Conor Rynne oh yeah that would explain it
Conor Rynne Very true. I think Sony requested voice acting for the PS1 port of Rayman 2. They had to find some way of making it special. I just wish they had all the level designs, music tracks, and lums present in the N64 and DC versions.
The Dreamcast port is based on the PC version which came out just a month from the original n64 released so there where no voice acting up until that point. I prefer the made up voices because it gives it more atmosphere and the voice acting is pretty cringy tbh
@@TheGlasgowGamer I am glad it is different because there are added bits and pieces as well as cut.
Sound is way better on PS1...
But everything else goes to the N64!
N64 has more language choices. N64 wins!!!
Nintendo tbm louco! são todos mesmo idioma.
Then why do they speak only gibberish in the N64 version?
AJ Knight That's what Rayman is known for, the characters speaking random gibberish
I'll go with the PS1 version.
Doo won Dee
Man, I had no idea there was an N64 version! I was a playstation baby and grew up in the mid 90's, but man this game was a fever dream, and a good one too. Thanks for putting so much effort with this comparison dude!
The N64 version is the original one.
Ray Man 2 was one of the few games that wasn't adversely effected by the trilinear filtering of the N64 which resulted in excess blurriness to the textures. I think the textures did not fit the filtering right in other games that had excess blurriness. While in theory tri-linear filtering was suppose to clean out textures from pixels, instead blurred them to the point where pixels were more preferable.
Samuel Morales Yea, the N65 had a terrible texture cache (the Saturn had over 250 pixel for the textures) but there was no filtering, then the PC and Dreamcast comes and blows N64 to its grave with texture filtering AND high quality textures
The textures simply lack resolution in general, it's not the texture filtering.
Meanwhile the PS1 usually can't even do one of the most basic of basics of 3d graphics properly (perspective correct texture mapping.)
Still, the N64 has a reprogrammable graphics chip, and could have turned all of those features such as trilinear filtering, antialiasing (yes, it had antialiasing) and so on off, but Nintendo didn't let anyone do that.
The trick to n64 games not looking blurry is more complex than texture filtering. - You can see it in the later games such as Rebel Strike and Conker's bad fur day; The developers reprogrammed the system to handle textures differently, which resulted in considerably more texture detail onscreen.
Turning off the texture filtering wouldn't have made n64 games any more detailed, it would have just made them seriously pixellated.
i'm impressed that the n64 version is running at such a smooth framerate
The problem with N64 was the lack of CD. Apart from that, it was just a more powerful machine than PS1
Twice as powerful, PS1 was only 32bit
In the PS1 Version all the models are extremely low-poly and chunky but the sounds are good.
Why there are so significant Changes in Details, for exaample: When Globox is brought to his cell the Prison Cell Door is wooden, in the N64 Versions there are Lasers. why?
Even little Things are changed.
I always found the wobbling textures in ps kind of 😂
wasn't the p1 version missing almost half of the original content this is not a fair comparison.
invadertak1001 that's the point, the N64 by default wins because the PSX was a piece of shit when it came to this port
grew up on this game had a 64 and I like the voices way better for 64 it's worth some good laughs along the way
N64
N64 got this one, by a wide margin. The N64 hardware was pretty great with platformers
impresionante como la versión de Nintendo 64 es prácticamente la versión del Dreamcast pero corriendo en 480i en lugar de 480p en dc. Parece más un juego de siguiente generación y un logro en ambas consolas aunque me guste más la versión DC . Pero acá es obvio que gana N64
N64 la máquina de la diversión
@@KyokaMaruyama you should learn some spanish
Sabemos más inglés nosotros que vosotros español, inútil.
I know the version of PS1 is not the best and I know several levels were removed. But I cannot not prefer it, it was the first game that introduced me to a game with a story that was not an excuse and I liked that the characters speak in my languague (Spanish) and not make simple noises. You could skip the tutorials and scenes if you did not want to see them again. The music is great, I like the scenes of the guardians of the masks; It gives a reason for why they attack Rayman.
Spyro PS2 version would love to say hello
PS2 version not have Spanish voices...
PS1 version wins because it contained a free beach ball.
Yeah, but it also loses because Of the hilarious line: "GLOOOOOBOOOOOOOX!"
N64 version wins cause it comes in a green cart 😊👍 plus your version is missing some content
Music: Playstation
Voice Actor: Playstation
Graphics: Nintendo 64
To me Rayman 1 was the son of Super MARIO world and odyssey world.
Rayman 2 was then the master of the platform action genre and to me the superior of all platformers during the mascot platform era.
The water looks a lot better on the N64 than PlayStation. ONly thing I really like about the PS1 version more is the music. I do KIND OF like the English voices.
I had the PC version, from what I can tell that one had the same graphics and "voice acting" as the n64, but the same soundtrack as the ps1
Wow, even the sound is better on the 64...that's really sad. I mean, the graphics on the 64 was expected, but when the cartodge system is doing better than CD, something's gone wrong.
Resident Evil 2 was like this as well.
La versión de ps1 es muy buena pero la de N64 es mejor en textura. Igual pienso que en texturas siempre va salir ganando n64 por su mayor potencia.
They both look gorgeous.
Ubisoft did an amazing job on all consoles. The PS1 version is brutal for 1995 hardware, but the N64 version is very close to the level of a PC Master Race of the time. Amazing!
1999 huh. You'd wonder why Conker's bad fur day is so exceptional in having full voice acting on the N64...
I mean, sure it relies on mp3 decompression and the use of a 512 megabit cartridge, but did no-one else even consider it?
Come to think of it, late Rare titles (1999-2001 or so) ALL had full voice acting... Perfect dark even has more than 30 minutes of fully voice acted cutscenes you can play from it's menu (plus in-level dialogue)...
It's not impossible, but I guess it either didn't occur to anyone, or they didn't feel like trying... Or... Something...
DREAMCAST WINS!!! 😏
playstation looks better with more vibrant colors and sharper texture. the 3d models look better on the n64 with anti-aliasing, sound and music is better on the playstation.
Wow never knew the PS1 version looked this bad in comparison to the N64. Easy winner...N64.
Simplemente los graficos de Nintendo 64 son superiores...No solo por la calidad de las texturas...El frame-rate de 64 es superior...El numero de poligonos de PS1 es inestable...
Si solo el sonido de PS1 es mejor los sonidos raros de N64 me dan miedo
@@policeman911pdman xd
La estabilidad poligonal es clave para la experiencia de los plataformas 3d, y en ese aspecto el ps1 nunca pudo superar al primer juego Mario 64, ya en otros tipos de juego play 1 pudo competir e incluso mejorar al Nintendo 64 , como juegos con una carga poligonal grande como figthings o carreras, debido a que el procesador gráfico del play 1 era muy bruto y potente, podía pegar más "fuerte", mientras que el de 64 era más sofisticado y su potencia se expresaba en el "trazado fino", es decir "efectos": como el corrector de perspectivas, el antia leasing, la estabilidad, los diferentes filtros.
Siempre odié a ps1 por tener a Lara Croft en sus 5 primeras entregas
@@silvinocordovahuerta8387 Bueno, Crash Bandicoot y Spyro si se ven mejores que Mario 64 y por mucho.
wow i'm surprised the n64 version runs at 60 fps you don't see that with alot of games made for it
Seria bacana ter mais comparativos N64 vs PSX.
To be fair, the N64 was the system the game was designed for in the first place. It was exclusive to the N64 for quite while and ports to other systems only came into the picture months later. It's obvious the Dreamcast version is the best but it's also a console from a whole different generation.
If anything the PC port is the ultimate version of the original Rayman 2. The dreamcast version has enough changed in it to be like a version 2 of the game (enemy placement and stage hazards are changed around) but without as vast differences as the psx version
Gotta love the water in the N64
Digipad controls in 3D platformers are worse than tank controls in Resident Evil. I need my analog stick for these games. N64 automatically beats PS1 in everything that has 3D gameplay because of the better controls.
Porque la imagen de N64 tiene el contraste bajado al minimo? La comparación es falsa tengo ese juego y se ve con mas brillo
I'd say the N64 ver wins. Graphics are much smoother than the PS1 ver. Plus the animation is alot smoother as well. Although, that might because of the expansion pak. But still.
graphicly the n64 wins
but the sounds the psx have voice over .
also at 1:32 the n64 said 1000 lums , and in the psx version it said 800 lums
For some reason I like it better when they talk in complete gibberish than when they are fully voices. Voice acting is Rayman 3 was awesome though, Murfy, Andre and Globox were all funny as fuck.
Ps1 really holds its own here, even though N64 has better graphics, this game proves PlayStation 1 was an amazing system.
Don't forget the Dreamcast version as well 😁👍🏾
N64 its best im all,excep to the voices are not incluid this is a extra on PlayStation,and the points are 1000 in N64,800 in PlayStation.
Wasn't expecting Globox to sound like Big the Cat...
N64, pros. Faster fps. Higer resolution. Better shading. More diolauge cut sence.
Cons. Sound qualety.
Ps1, pros. Sound qualety. Better perforens on the cut sceanes, with more detail.
Cons. Fps. Shading. Resolution.
Overal, great video.
Rayman: Yeah!
voice clip: Hey.
Muito interessantes as diferenças entre as versões. E a jogabilidade o que achou +Canal Vc Decide?
+LGD Retrogamer Achei a jogabilidade do N64 muito melhor, mas até que me surpreendeu a jogabilidade do jogo no PS1, pois esperava algo muito pior xD
i miss the cartoony smoothy textures on games.
So much better looking and smoother on the N64 but it's lacking high quality audio and there isn't as much going on due to space limitations.
For Rayman 2 is even better grabbing the Dreamcast version, and also Rayman Revolution for PS2 ( kinda a remake of Rayman 2 )
The N64 version uses simple giberish which sounds better compared to the voice acting of the other version and the N64 version has larger levels than the PlayStation game and better graphics. Overall the N64 original is the best version of the game right behind the Dreamcast version.
Weird that the N64 version has more languages when considering the systems limitations, u would think the ps1 version would have more languages
Ubisoft Shanghai butchered the ps1 version
I always thought graphics wise N64 was completely superior but watching this it's much smoother and characters and seems to have much more polygons but the textures are better on PS1 wow
Eu só zerei a versão de ps1, ela foi feita na Ubisoft da China ou Singapura, acho. Tem muita coisa cortada, como fases e alguns elementos do jogo em geral (como o Murphy).
Acho um bom port, mas a melhor versão ainda é a Revolution do DC/PS2.
the n64 version is better than ps1 version
I actually like the gibberish, it’s funny 😂
Nobody's even mentioning the amount of animations in the PS version that are not present in the N64 version. I guess they're pretending not to see them.
I'll give the N64 a pass this time. The N64 version looks better than the PlayStation version (I remember renting the N64 version in 1999 years before buying the Dreamcast version and I played the PlayStation version at a hotel in Anaheim back in 2002). However, the PlayStation sounds better due to it's CD quality soundtrack.
Why does Globox sound like Big the Cat?
Wasn't this written for the N64 first? They obviously had to scale it back quite a bit to run on the PSX. Interestingly some of the PSX wall textures look better but that's about the best thing I can say about it really. The skyboxes are little better on the PSX too I think.
La del N64 esta casí a la par de la de Sega Dreamcast :0
Franco Crurdz es básicamente la versión Dreamcast pero sin música calidad CD y en un cartucho de 32 megabytes (256 megabits), el juego funciona en la máxima resolución de la Nintendo 64 que es de 640x480i lo cual es impresionante, y puede igualar a la versión DC sin el VGA activo (480p60fps) . Realmente parece un juego de 6ta generación más que de 5ta
Bueno no exageremos. La n64 se queda corto en texturas y brillo de imagen ante la ps1. Además la ps1 es mejor por tener voces en español.
@@Reptil1988 El brillo mayor en PS1 es para ocultar la falta de efectos graficos y la paleta de colores reducida del sistema.
Y lo de las voces es limitacion de espacio es un cartucho de 32MB comparado a un CD de 700MB.
En N64 hay mucha mejor calidad grafica,mas poligonos,escenarios mas grandes,sin tiempos de carga,incluye mas contenido siendo 1000 esferas en N64 y 800 en PS1.
Y ademas mucha mayor resolucion con Expansion Pak y Anti Aliashing y filtrados de texturas.
En PS1 ademas de reducirse en contenido y graficos tambien se redujo en resolucion siendo 280x240i.
Es obvio que la N64 manejaba mas poligonos, es un sistema de 64 bits, pero el resultado de la PS1 es mas satisfactorio, como dije. El CD permito mayor calidad de texturas, audio de mejor calidad y sobre todo VOCES en español. La PS1 disimulaba mejor la falta de poligonos, algo que que en este juego no supieron aprovechar bien.
@@Reptil1988 Amigo la version de PS1 solo soporta mejor calidad sonora,las texturas son de muy baja calidad comparada a las demas versiones,y los bits no equivale a mejor manejo de poligonos en el sistema.
La Xbox es de 32bits y maneja mucha mayor calidad y cantidad de poligonos que la PS2 que es de 128bits.
Y lo de las voces es lo unico que tiene mejor respecto a N64,aunque es una minoria puesto que en N64 hay mas contenido jugable,aunque eso ya va por gustos.
3:15 Beautiful sync...
Because of large space in the media, PS version has dubbed voices and larger textures. The advantages ends here. The horse power of N64 make the elements move smoothly, while in PSX, everything shakes (textures, polygons, it's distortion everywhere). And this is valid for ALL 3d games on N64 and PSX. In other words, N64 calculates the things more smoothly and precise. PSX is like playing an earthquake. Still, a few games managed to look good on PSX, but the lack of elegance processing polygons, makes ALL games on n64 less nauseating than in PSX.
I'm talking only about graphics, clearly, Sony made market decisions that helped the PSX beat n64 in sales (when Nintendo discontinued the N64, sales numbers were 32 million N64 vs 72 million PSX. After this, PSX managed to sell above 100 million consoles.
But to be honest, despite of having absolute classics like FF VII, Symphony of the Night, or Metal Gear Solid, PSX games aged worse than N64 games. It's easy to observe that, any lists of best of all time, we always find 3, 4 N64 games between the Top 10, and not a single one of PSX in the lists. GoldenEye was fantastic, Perfect Dark managed to have a so gorgeous and complex multiplayer, that no game until 2018 managed to overcome. You can configure absolutely everything and build the most insane, fun and deep matches in any FPS game in history. Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time share the throne as the best games of all time in any serious list.
The first 4 Crash Bandicoot games?
Graphics in N64 win without a question lol