Judge Immediately Sanctions Alex Jones for ‘Stunningly Cavalier Attitude’ in Sandy Hook Case
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2022
- Slamming a “stunningly cavalier attitude,” Judge Barbara Bellis kicked off Alex Jones’ Connecticut trial by sanctioning his defense from presenting evidence or arguments that he didn’t profit from Sandy Hook coverage. Read more on this story: bit.ly/3BywQkx
#AlexJones #Defamation #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
READ MORE ON THIS STORY: bit.ly/3BywQkx
Hurt feeling from profits
Listen to this shithead talk big on his radio show. I know it's painful on the ears, just a few minutes and you stand a good chance of hearing him talk about how he never said anything wrong about SH and how government won't let him speak.
And how all of us are next.
Come to think about it: Jones-R 2024.
Prisondent
So now we are in Connecticut and things look like they're getting off to a God-awful start for Alex Jones which makes me happy which should make every decent human being happy.... To say literally one of the worst humans or or piece of garbage in the shape of a human Alex Jones finally getting His life ripped to shreds is a beautiful thing to behold
@@shawnwilliam4653 That defense lawyer is awful. InfoWars KNOWS it was using Google Analytics. LMAO. Someone call Saul. They need his help. A fictional lawyer would do better...I hop Jones offs himself when he ends up in jail down the road.
@@shawnwilliam4653
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Never hire a musician to be your lawyer
"Yeah, well, that's just like, your opinion man"
Cave man, attorney at law
What do you call someone who tested at the absolute bottom of the bar exam? "Counselor."
*sings* I second that emotionnnn.
Worse, he's literally a stand-up comedian. Even worse, he's a failed stand-up whose only joke is 'How come I can't call N-words N-words anymore? I need WOKE INSURANCE!'
Rule:
1, don't argue with the judge
2, don't talk over the judge
3, don't act like you know more about the law than they do
4, don't talk down to the judge
5, don't interrupt the judge
6, don't give the judge attitude
Judge not lest ye be judged
Don’t judge the judge
Or the bailiff will tackle you...
His lawyer weaves words in a way you just want him to shut up! He makes no sense.
Pathological liars do this often. They talk using a lot of words; and they talk very fast. They think this 'razzle dazzle' can help them slip things over on people. Or, they can get their way because the listener finally gets frustrated and gives in.
4:40 Yes counselor...try talking down to the judge, as if she's in grade school. That's always a great strategy! 😂
Weird
Jones has a knack for picking attorneys. Or maybe it is more likely fewer are willing to work with him. He would be unbearable!!
Cause he believes he is smart.
"the client's shop is not well organized and it's a mess, I think.. blah blah blah..."
@@Smoke6six4 well she’s a judge so 🤷♂️
BOOM!
Nothing defeats a tort defense like a complete decapitation of a defendant's possible excuses, get-arounds, justifications and clean-ups.
Exactly! It’s about time Alex gets knocked down to size!!!
@@mollycote1021 why?
@@mollycote1021 about time you did
Alex was right t-shirts are only $20 ATM
So I ordered 50 of them from infowars to support him
love ya Alex Jones
You mean completely denying their right to a trial?
It's all a show. You cheer it on because you personally don't like Jones, but you have no principles. You ewouldn;t agree if it was someone you supported, and maybe one day it will be.
Freedom of Speech doesn't mean Lies can't be held accountable.
Speech is free, you must pay for lies.
What about cnn. Huh
@@iandelmore8376 what about a new 7 month old troll account? Huh?
Deranged lunatics call anyone who disagrees with you "liars". Censoring/punishing people for what their opinions and beliefs is tyrannical, dangerous, and disgusting. Same with anyone who supports it.
This judge seems less lenient and forgiving than the Texas judge. PM Jones is in real trouble.
Too bad that means we're gonna hear from more Jones fans in the comments sections saying somehow the judge is biased and they need to throw out the case
Point proven
@@amandasummers7881 You mean like Judge Aileen Cannon?
@@amandasummers7881 sure just like the biased commenters
Let's hope so.
Pattis saying he "can't keep track of every detail" was simply mind-blowing!! Jones' other attorney sent the prosecution Jones' full cell phone content -evidently mistakenly and did nothing to recall it!- This repository of communications proved Jones lied!!!
Where does Jones find these losers??? Maybe they buy his supplements!
I think some people pick attorneys based on how long they’ve practiced not looking at what their win vs loss stats are which can be unfortunate in some cases… that said I’m thankful Jones seems to be one of those people.
You sound like CNN they have trained you well young sheep!
Good lol Elaine bredehoft the second
Maybe they are TFG's hand-me-down lawyers, God knows his are not stunningly competent either.
Who would want to represent him? Maybe the only ones that accepted.
How incompetent are Jones legal team? Good grief...
Jones biggest problem is he's guilty as sin...hard to defend.
Imagine Biden & his family. Pretty similar.
Defense lawyers cost a lot and I am certain he looks for the cheapest out there - these are the bargain basement types.
Not incompetence. They were hired by Jones for a reason. They've been just as shady as their client.
he engaged his lawyers from the bargain store
Based on the Alex Jones parable, wouldn't it be wonderful if all crooks got the lawyers they deserved?
Obama and Clintons would have Lionel from the Simpsons.
@@kevinb9830 lol what dude? Don’t you goofs ever get sick of saying the same nonsense over and over? What exactly are you defending this guy for?
@@manden7510 I'm defending the principle of free speech. I know people such as yourself struggle with the concept of a principled argument.
This lawyer has actually made a strong argument...given what he's got to work with.
I mean...when you have ALL the evidence that is just so overwhelmingly damning...there's but so much you can do. Alex Jones is just about the worst possible client. Yet...someone this is about...Obama I guess?
@@kevinb9830 what is the principle of free speech? Relieve our struggles.
Jones lawyer - we have google analytics but we don't use them. Seriously? The judge is going to believe that? Alex's defense might be off to a rocky start.
It was very clumsy wording. What that very likely meant is that they opt-in to Google tracking clicks on their site, but they do not actually exercise their access rights to the data google makes available to them. You'd have to reference google's log information to know whether that is truthful.
The data is all tracked by google *AGAINST* their site.
This order was quite comparable to a defendant being compelled to produce closed circuit video footage of themselves in a certain building that is completely operated by a third party. Plaintiff would have to produce the video footage by contacting the owner of the recording system. In this case, plaintiff was rightfully required to seek this information from google.
I don't make videos but, I have stumble upon it, while just fartin around.
I have a business and have Google Analytics embedded in the website. But I rarely ever look at the numbers. So it is not that farfetched of a claim as it sounds.
It’s not believable. Nothing Alex Jones says is believable. You have to force him to comply with every little step, every little detail. The man still does not have an ounce of regret over what he did.
Moreover, unless you actually go to Google's portal and log in to their system, their analytics data never touches your system at all and stays in Google's sole possession.
They are so full of it trying to claim they have Google Analytics but don’t use it. There is zero chance they can make that kinda money without using Analytics to tune their ad campaigns and funnels in.
Absolutely, an absurd claim.
Dudes making 100k a day online lol yea guys we r just really good, we don't need any data
Of course they use it, all marketing people use it.
@@willgary8792 - The guy isn’t making $100,000 a day.
@@willgary8792 up to 800k/day not 100k.
Jones lawyer: “there’s no evidence to support …” so that’s why we refuse to turn over the spreadsheet that would contain the evidence….because we prefer that you not have evidence to show what we have done or not done.
@@aremedyfrosty That's absolutely not true in a legal sense or a moral one. When you do harm to someone by telling lies intended to enrich yourself, you aren't covered by a right to freedom of expression. The right to freedom of expression exists to prevent the government from making specific speech illegal. It doesn't protect people from consequences for willfully harming others with lies that they know are lies.
@@aremedyfrosty there are penalties for exploiting the first amendment for money... Keep watching and you shall learn.
@@grammar_shark …did you just successfully chase away a jackass with reason? and facts? Never thought I’d see the day. Well done.
The production has to turn over evidence to the defense not the other way around. why? the gOVERnMEnt has the JUDGE, DA Cops and ALL the spy dog AGencies$ for resources and the defendant has only their defense lawyer from the same BAR CLUB of GOLIATH to speak for them.. WTFU
@@deborahhershey3045 That's not how civil law works. For example, in a divorce suit, neither party can refuse to turn over an accounting of all marital assets.
It's hard to win when you have no legal grounds to stand on. This judge is great; perfect for this case.
The judge is the most biased and unprofessional judge I've ever seen.
@@Joe-mz6dc 😆😆😆 You must love the “professionalism” of that longhair defense rube. Be better.
@@Joe-mz6dc 🤣🤡🤡
All nationalists should just be guilty, no defense no trial
@@jwol11741 the irony of your comment is astonishing. With your intelligence, I doubt you will be able to ascertain what the irony is.
This Judge is such a decent human being lmfao! Literally going through all of the submissions in court live calling them out calmly. Respect.
Are you saying she’s practicing Law from the bench?
@@allrightsreserved3237 You mean, upholding the law????
@@allrightsreserved3237 No actually she's being the Judge. I know folks who are losing don't like it when someone bigger than them puts them in their place, but them's the breaks I'm afraid 🤷
@@allrightsreserved3237 no, that’s not what he’s saying.
That being said, Jones’ lawyers are pretending to practice law, and it’s not going well.
says$ who a fellow sleaze ball lawyer POS like you! STFU and stop pretending you are just another Joe Public .. you're a scumbag demonRAT lawyer POS sleaze BALL!
There actually *is* proof that they used Google Analytics post installation on the domain, since a reverse search of their UA ID reveals they added it to other related domains in 2018, 2020 and 2021. It was definitely being checked and expanded.
The facts this case are dealing with are from 2015 or 2016
@@rydplrs71 Ah, so is the question did IW use (aside from setting up) Google Analytics during those years? That should be easy to see with the same analysis.
His Lawyer said: "…there’s no evidence this database was consulted between 2019 and 2022, none."
@@rydplrs71 Yes though the point being made is that Alex Jones lawyers are saying that their client did not EVER use Google analytics ever and yet they got found out thatchy DID use it for another period of time in which case how do we know they did not use it for the period being asked about?
@@markharrisllb Yes because no lawyer ever lied, right!
In order to use Google analytics, you have to have code inserted on each page of the website. The defendant lawyer's argument about a book in the library as an example is not even close.
No you don’t.
@@StyvynWayne Does Google Analytics require code?
To measure a website, you first have to create a Google Analytics account. Then you need to add a small piece of JavaScript measurement code to each page on your site.
@@lonewolf1461 - In 2022? No.
No pulling the wool over this judge’s eyes. She bites back. 🥳
Mixed metaphor there.
@@andrewvelonis5940 How so?
@@maryfitzpatrick3252 in what other case does the defense ever have to literally produce documents they never created to hand over to the other party? The number of times alex Jones is being made to bend over and do things no other defense would ever have to provide. They have handed over much more in discovery than any other media company being sued ever. It's outrageous. They have his emails.. His texts... All the companies documents. Yet the plaintiff still claim they have basically nothing.... And have been given nothing. And the media keeps spreading the lies. It's nuts. On top of Alex not being able to even defend himself as the court issued a default judgment. What's the problem with a defense being able to defend themselves.... They want him to not be allowed to say they did not profit off this tragedy. What's the Issue? If you have all the proof then why are you scared about letting a defense argue a point. Oh they have no proof... And know it's not there... So they want a biased judge to help them.... And this judge does just that. It's insane. Sad to watch
No matter how you feel about Alex Jones. This should not happen in America
@@ajwysopal Apparently you have never been through document discovery in a divorce case😇
His lawyer is a real piece of work. He just has this attitude that he knows more than everyone and this judge isn't having it.
I've noticed that people look for reflections of themselves in the lawyers they choose.
@@whoopsydaisy6389 so true
his lawyer sucks balls
As evidenced by his choice of hairstyle his perceptions of right and wrong are skewed…
Time for him to cut that pony tail.
Not once did the defense attorney refer to the judge as "your honor." I find that very disrespectful.
Nothing disrespectful about calling them "Judge".
They’re a judge. You can call them judge. They aren’t a higher power. No need to refer to them as “your honor”.
Go blow the queen.
Alex Jones is a waste of space.
How has he survived as a lawyer continuously interrupting the judge?
he has clients desperate enough to hire him. My bet is he is more valued for his lax morals than for competency.
@@dracoargentum9783 Sounds like Alex found the perfect lawyer for him.
@@dracoargentum9783
You got that right. Norm Pattis takes the low lying fruit of well-known cases locally in CT, here is is taking one that is widely known nationally but just as despicable. He will lose big.
I want Jones dragged over the coals, I don’t think he’s gonna get as much leeway as he did in Texas.
Did you get a new job for trolling the comment section ?
@@Adam-sb2vp You support Jones? That tells me you have a serious problem.
wow!..playing God feels good
@@rtqii Yes anyone you don’t like or who doesn’t agree with you or ur GOD the TV, shod be put before a firing squad ‼️
@@rtqii You're quite the smooth brain if that is your logic.
She's got zero tolerance for cute legal tricks. Not in the mood for a floor show and expects everyone to follow due diligence as to their responsibilities to the court.
She is hardly an impartial judge with the excess adjectives. You shouldn't be impressed.
@@theloanranger2632
He has failed in this case from the get by not providing the court ordered disclosures making him guilty by default. She’s simply not going to let him or his lawyer attempt to make this into an Infowars hell’s-cape of BS. Jones can’t play victim after figuratively flipping off the court and failing to even appear.
She’s a Globally appointed Judge.
She needs to be removed ... she made many errors... Then she throws her pen when she gets mad like a little kid
@@orange441000 Lol.
You can literally see steam coming out of the judge's ears.
Note to litigants: Courts (i.e. judges) do not like to be played
Using the library book analogy, if a court orders you to produce a certain book that is alleged to be in your library, you are required to go to the shelf and produce that book, regardless of whether you know of the existence of that book.
If the "Book" doesn't exist, then how are you suppose to produce the "Book" to the court?
@@donking5828 Ah! The ol "book" on the shelf tactic.
@@tyjohnston5889 Yep
@@tyjohnston5889 Trump's using the librarian tactic in his court filings. I guess fans of Jones are getting things mixed up.
Or If you don’t know it’s there then how do you know it’s there or not? Let’s ask him to bring his 10th grade report card in… I think it’s a little much but I guess that’s why his attorney needs to ask the right questions to prove in front of the jury that he didn’t use it. But I think there should be something to say you can’t bring in evidence that can clearly be proven never was used. Aka it’s a waste of time if it’s clear that it’s irrelevant.
"Lionel Hutz, Attorney at Law. I'll be representing Mr. Alex Jones for the duration of this trial. I'm also an expert shoemaker."
I miss Lionel
And a travel agent. He will send Mr. Jones to a heavily barred, high-security prison for the extended vacation of his life. Think of all of the interesting people he will meet!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤡🤡
With 22 years of web development experience especially in eCommerce, this is a blatant lie on the behalf of Alex Jones. To say they do not use Google Analytics to see what current advertising schemes, live show matter, and current events are not used to track and see what is working on a daily, weekly, monthly, and annual basis is preposterous for a company that makes millions off of online product sales.
Get 'em Judge Bellis! Love a Judge who has "eyes on the back of her head"....nothin gets past her.
This case is a travesty. A man is on trial for his beliefs? Sounds like another Scopes Monkey Trial to me.
haha looks like someone tried to make a comment that got deleted....
Time's up. If the defense intended to file properly they had more than enough time to do so. Solid ruling from the judge on this matter.
@Valentino Makaveli Except it wasn't.
@Valentino Makaveli TIME'S UP!
Rules for sanctions are found in the court rules of every jurisdiction in the US, state and federal. Non-compliance -- and we have seen this from Jones in every one of the tort cases -- has consequences.
Take on a bad client? Bad outcome should be expected.
@Valentino Makaveli guess Jonies should have provided the svidence.... oh well. Take his money
@Valentino Makaveli Yes, Jones has tried to suppress quite a bit of evidence.
Btw, even 6rh graders know they can't tell their teacher that they did the homework but forgot to turn it in and still expect the teacher to provide them a grade other than an "F" on homework she hasn't seen.
This is what a defense attorney has to do when he has no case.
Yeah this is a clear "should have settled and avoided the storm" scenario.
Yeah this is a clear "should have settled and avoided the storm" scenario.
They could check the change history and see if any reports or changes were made. It is unbelievable that a business with the volume that Alex Jones's website would have wouldn't consult their analytics. It seems like they are going to drag out discovery and refuse to comply with requests as they did during the previous trial.
Happy to see the judge issuing sanctions against the defense.
8:50 THIS judge is so biased.... A defense should never have to produce a document that they don't use or have. It's insane. The plaintiff has no proof of it.. Yet they claim it.. So the judge says it must be so... That's outrageous. No other media company or person has ever had to provide so much in discovery. Alex Jones has given over everything they have.... Personal text messages... Emails.... Business documents.... Ect ect... Yet the plaintiffs still act like they have been given nothing.... And the media and judge are spreading the lie that Alex Jones had given nothing... Wow... Find me a case of a defense that has given over more than Alex Jones has. Seriously. This is a mockery of our courts. A former fbi agent sliding into this lawsuit is also pathetic. This entire case is so wack.
You clearly don't know what you are talking about. They clearly have the Google Analytics page tags in their website pages and likely have always had them there. That doesn't mean that they request the reports from Googles data servers. There would be no change history on any of the InfoWars websites as they likely have had those lines of code there for years. All those lines of code do is send data to Google. Google stores that data and offers tools to analyze it, but in order to take advantage of this service, you have to actually request the data back from Google. If you never requested this data from Google, then you don't have it. That is the argument made by the Defense here. The Plaintiffs are arguing that simply having these lines of code on your web pages means that you regularly request reports from Google, which is pure nonsense.
@@truthedministry lol, you cIearIy don’t know what you are talking about. The data is always accessible in GA, even if you don’t Iogin for a year. But of course they access and use the data regularly. 🤡 Alex and his employee even explained how they make decisions on subject matters and ads based on that data.
Good to hear!! Hope he has to pay mega million fees over and over and over. He is heartless.
He's heartless because he has an opinion that differs from yours?
@@libertywatcher1247 Why did someone say that he was "heartless?" He's heartless because he preys on the incredible pain and grief of the parents and families of MURDERED CHILDREN! Does that represent a gentle heart, a person of character and compassion to you? SMH
@@libertywatcher1247 "Heartless" is sharing that opinion with an audience of the deeply disturbed who delighted in tormenting grieving parents of children who were murdered at Sandy Hook.
Alex is in for an ugly surprise when his own children are old enough to understand what their Daddy did.
Fortunately he's not a dumbs like you. Rich, smart people, like me and Alex Jones keep our assets in a trust, thus protecting them from any civil judgement.
@@libertywatcher1247 he's heartless because he called a school shooting fake, not caring about families losing their children... also he brainwashed his brainless fanboys, of which you seem to be 🛎🔚
Gotta love a no nonsense judge, Alex Jones is Super Screwed🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣
Lie like teaching kids men can get pregnant, right loser? You liberals are a cancer.
I thought we all knew you're not supposed to hire a lawyer with a triple style ponytail
😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣I know! It's just wrong! 😂😂😂
He should stick to music
We also knew you're not supposed to try to make money off the lies you tell about the suffering of others. Alex seemed to have missed both memos.
The man is ridiculous.
Telling lies is never a great business model. But for some, they can't be told, they need to experience the ramifications.
Exactly
Tell cnn that
Jones was wrong about SH but right about Bilderberg and the World Economic Forum
Don't let the sideshow distract you from the fact that Bill Gates os now the biggest owner of farmland in the US, and China also owns millions of acres.
But telling lies is his entire business model! Its the whole dang platform!
oh lies can be a great business model, just look at Fox news. Alex's problem is that he doesn't know when to cut bait until its too late because he doesn't have a boss to tell him when he is entering a legal minefield
Some people can only learn the hard way, thus they will be taught 'the hard way'.
Through their pockets. That's all they care about
@@NastyWoman1979
I believe Jones won’t be done seeing the inside of a court room anytime soon. It was just recently found he was spying on both his current and ex wife. Such a toxic vile load of lard.
Because he is an F-ing liar.
All of the whispering going on when a lawyer is talking drove me nuts. I wonder if the judge could hear it. If I were the judge I would put a stop to it immediately.
it was just near the microphone that recorded the video, I was wondering what was being whispered too.
Same lol I thought it was just me. I have ADD and any little thing disrupts my attention.
That is called a sidebar, but this judge has the sidebar videotaped. The reason you sidebar is so the jury can't hear but here that seems, ok? I never seen this before.
@@johnraiti9867 No, the comment was directed at certain intervals in which the judge was being addressed from counsel table. If I were the lawer (shudder) I would have put a stop to it.
Oh my, stop it.
The JUDGE decided jones was guilty- not va jury.
Jones never mentioned any of the defendants by name.
First Alex Jones, next you
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
Freedom of speech is dying.
How
Some people defend jones is beyond me you can’t really go lower than claiming a mass shooting involving young children a hoax he should be in jail
Free Speech you commi!
@@beals6631 Free speech has nothing to do with the freedom to tell deliberate lies. That confusion is driving the entire US into a state of national madness.
Any and every person deserves the best defence possible.
@@beals6631 you have absolutely no concept of what this case is about. Free speech is irrelevant in every possible angle in this case.
@@feesemass7895 Grow up
never trust a man with a double ponytail.
or a double chin
He should have at least done a messy bun.
Jones's lawyer seems to at least be trying this time. "evidence wasn't provided betweet 1919 and 2022" lol
This is amazing ...This guy spreads lies and hurts people and there are actually people sticking up for him....shows the intelligence level of his audience
The parents spread lies too. I'm not defending Jones but it's bs that no one is acknowledging that they lied too.
Low IQ people with zero critical thinking skills. It's a rapidly growing disease in modern society. It's sad and infuriating to see.
The intelligence level was high in Dec 2012, the decline was due to youtube and others deleting truth to make this event seem real. I feel sorry for all who believe this nonsense.
Yeah I am Amazed at the people like that in this comment section, beyond a screw loose.
Maybe he will declare bankruptcy and hide away on his yacht
Isnt "keeping track of every detail" your JOB?!?!?! I bet you keep track of every detail when you charge your clients Pattis...birds of a feather right!?!??!
My sister used to work for a prominent lawyer in a large western city, he HATED having to talk to clients. I think we're seeing some that mentality now.
Could Alex Jones possibly be setting up some kind of appeal for incompetent representation? I’m Canadian so I’m not familiar with civil suits and whether or not there can be an appeal after a judgement.
No. No such thing in a Civil Trial in the USA.
He could try, but I highly doubt he will and if he did, it wouldn't go far. These parents are as protected as the President. Dead kids right? So of course everyone walks on shattered glass around them and doing things like this, only ensures even more people are afraid of them.
A Canadian B's fan? 😊
@@Ocrilat Thank you! That was the answer I was hoping to get I just wasn’t sure if it was the answer that would deal with the U.S. legal system
He can't find good representation because most law firms don't want to be associated with him. Also he's an extremely uncooperative client and then there's his unhinged 'fans'.
Did Jones lawyer thought it will be cool to look like a poodle in court? 🤦🏼♂️
😂 😂😂😂👍👍👍
Since he has absolutely nothing to offer as far as actual evidence goes, maybe he's hoping that she likes dogs.
I feel like tomorrow they’re going to find a video of Alex and his lawyers looking at Google analytics talking about how much money they’ll make with the info. And the lawyers will play it for the court.
How does a lawyer send an affidavit to opposing counsel, but NOT actually bother to file it with the court? I mean, it’s simple: You file it and they give you a file number.
worst job in the world: Being Alex Jone's lawyer.
how about being his wife.....
@@marcmederos6220 Then you at least get a free Blackwater 'bodyguard' paid by your husband to follow you around covertly and report on your behavior to your loving husband. Remember when Alex Jones used to be against surveillance?
Worse than Trump's?!
Well, that's debatable: the lawyer agrees to defending Jones, so his morals are already slick enough it shouldn't be a problem; and apparently competence isn't a factor for hiring; looks like in the end it's a cake walk, for those that believe there is no such thing as bad press.
[Keep in mind I'm a firm believer that every scum and slimebag deserves accurate counsel in court. When they agree to defend lies, that is their own doom.]
Someone needs to talk to Jonsey's lawyer about the lack of relevance of that ponytail. Does he practice law out of a dive bar storage closet?
That judge was so patient with his constant interruptions. I would have held him in contempt and fined him.
I have always found it interesting how easily Jones lies, and wants his lawyers to come into agreement
with his lies.
His entire career is based on lying to people & being the most horrible, selfish, vile, cruel, disgusting troll out there, so it’s no surprise that he expects everyone else to be the same as him.
Yeah, they can bend over backwards with their language etc, but the minute they lie outright to the court they run the risk of sanctions and put their law license at risk.
Yes does that game plan remind you of anyone?
@@longfellow5276 Yes, that rings a bell, but I just can't seem to put my finger on it...
I disagree. This case is a mockery. Alex Jones has given over more in discovery than any other in a similar case. Seriously find me another case like it with more. They have everything... A default judgment.. That alone is nuts... A former fbi agent added into this lawsuit... Shady and sick. The families waiting years to file... Never hearing the original words spoken... Not what this should be about
She makes Judge Judy look patient.
HA! Nice one
It is difficult to conceive of someone lower than Jones.
Really? I got one name. Hitler.
The people defending him in the comments? And the brain genius who replied to you with "Hitler"
@@cannibalcupcake333 You just managed to insult Hitler.
@@I_need_an_oil_change What do I get for a prize?
Please look up Father Coughlin and Tail Gunner Joe.
Alex learning the hard way that actions have consequences 🤥🤡
Alphabet people... smh
It's about fu#*ing time.
alex learning the hard way that there is a corrupt justice system taking away your first amendment and bill of rights. turning the country into the next adolf hitler nazi regime. goodbye freedom of speech hello tyrany and dictatorship.
you liberals like to see it
He learns nothing, he'll rant & rave then deny... and then commit the same behavior over again
Glad this motion for sanctions is recorded for all the conspiracy theorists thinking he's being treated unfairly
She summed it up about the Jones legal pattern. Don't do anything and if you do, just make stuff up.
doesn't sound terribly impartial, eh?
@@kevinb9830 Impartial? If one side does wrong should it not be penalised?
@@philipr1567 Not by the judge presiding bnefore the case has even begun, no.
@@kevinb9830 When the judge gives you a court order and your disobey it, you will absolutely have repercussions and consequences. The impartiality in the Constitution refers to criminal judiciary. This is civil.
@@kevinb9830 So in this instance (if I understand correctly) it seems that the defendant did not comply with court requirements to produce data, first claiming it did not exist, then admitting that it did exist, but claiming it was not used, all the time delaying handing over the information required by the court. Would you really expect the judge to say: "so you lied and disobeyed the court - that's fine, no problem; so you made a mockery of a court requirement and put the plaintiff at a disadvantage - no big deal, carry on"? If the plaintiffs pulled the same stunt on Alex Jones would you be of the same opinion?
I’m sure these analytics, like all analytics, have a cost associated with them
What media company, paying for this type of data, would never use it?
That makes zero sense
If they are talking about regular Google analytics those are free and easily available. I’m not sure what they mean “collecting” analytics.
@@snozcocram
Personal conjecture is conjecture, so here goes ...
What the Google analytics pertinent towards Alex Jones is a) how much traffic both his RUclips channel (thus tracks with likely earnings from his channel, especially from Patreon, and other paid subscriptions/donations) plus the InfoWars website (so donations to the latter) both got/get; and b) how much traffic I think his online store, plus Amazon sales (if Google tracks that ...) for his supplements etc was/is getting.
Bottom line, depending on what those analytics show, is, by default, likely not only show his _actual_ gross income across everything he does as CEO of his companies, but that then places a likely nett personal worth, of him the individual, without having to argue to get him to produce his actual tax returns, accounting, etc ...
Given he's already been adjudicated guilty, in a _Civil Court_ over defamation, slander, and libel, a default judgement made after two - three years of foot dragging on his, and his lawyers part (whom may face sanctions of their own, due to their conduct ...), again, this may well be part of another penalty phase of the one - two other civil proceedings that were also ongoing.
The reason why the Google analytics is key, is, most likely, he, and his legal team, trying to prove both the company Alex owns, and operates, and himself personally, has barely two nickels to rub together ...
However, as analytics tend to be pretty precise, as above, my conjecture for that being used, is to prove, likely with Forensic Accounting/Analysis of those analytics, that with all the traffic, and thus likely gross, and nett profits, plus his own, personal, nett worth, he isn't exactly penniless ...
Depending on the outcome on _all_ the damages awarded, the total, in all three cases, may 'only' amount to $50 - $60 million ... which maybe his lawyers could argue down to $45 million over all three, but who knows what the limits are, in terms of punitive damages, exist in Texas ...
... either way, he certainly is likely to face having to pay out a minimum of $30 million ... which I personally think is only fair, given what the families of the victims of Sandy Hook, many whose children were barely 10, or 11, when they were shot dead by a man whom should've been in in-patient psychiatric care ...
@@nigelft we are on the same page.
I just don’t know what they are referring to as far as collected analytics. Google analytics are available for an account going back to as old the account is. No need to collect them, just pull them up. I’m wondering if the collecting term has something to do with court terms…
@@nigelft why is it in america that what you say even when its not hate speech dictates your level of success and how the public perceives your ability to serve society. alex jones didn't do anything directly to the families he didn't go to their homes with a mega phone like michael moore screaming his rhetoric at them. instead you get a figure head of a movement that is being targeted to be destroyed publicly to shatter how the public views the people with opposing opinions
"I can't keep track of every detail." LOL.
He collected the data but didn't use it. Right.
Jones lawyer sounds like a kid trying to explain why he didn't do his homework and failing miserably.
The dog ate it!
You gotta hear the corporate representative depositions, they're hilarious!
"When did you watch the videos you're hear to testify about today?"
"......"
"Back up, assumption made. HAVE you watched the videos recently?"
"...... no....."
🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
Jones always hires, "all the best people." Watching the initial trial it was shocking how incompetent they were/are and their own client didn't care whether they were or not.
The best in Jones' eyes are the ones who are willing to play a verbal shell game and gum up the works. He doesn't want some who plays by the rules.
Freedom of Speech has been a big topic in these proceedings and it feels as though people are missing a crucial point:
Imagine someone is falsely convicted based off of a false allegation of SA or allegations involving a minor. Or at least has had their livelihood destroyed. Speaking from personal experience I have seen it happen to my ex's mom when I was a teen. They dragged court out over two years and did not have a shred of evidence so instead the state tried to outlast her financially, resulting in her losing all of her assets to afford lawyers and her reputation had been tarnished from the outset. During that time my ex and her siblings had to visit their mom under conditional settings as though she was already a criminal and this continued until my ex's mom was finally found not guilty on all counts.
Should free speech mean that libel, slander or defamation falls under protected speech if it can destroy people's lives. Clearly not.
The trial for defamation concerning Alex Jones never happened. The defendent did not comply for 2 or 3 years (can't remember) with supplying court ordered documents. This resulted in Alex recieving a default ruling. This means that his freedom of speech was never put to the test because he ceded his right to a trial. The Texas court proceedings were to determine the damages caused by the liable party since Alex was found liable by default. Regardless of what you think, the court should not change how it works in his favor or anyone's. The fact that it doesn't does not mean Alex didn't get a fair trial. That is all.
Freedom of Speech doesn't include Freedem to Lie. And Jones has been proven again and again that he lies. Plain and simple.
No trial for Jones would be fair (In the cosmic sense) unless he was bankrupted. But I certainly get your point.
The most crucial point about freedom of speech is people think it covers all speech. The constitution addresses government suppression of speech. It has nothing to do with what we say about each other. Or more to the point, anything Jones said about Sandy Hooks victims and their families.
@@brendajohnson3173 wrong
@@baggedtuned8569 First Amendment of the U.sS Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
It's FINALLY coming to fruition about Jones' constant lies. He can't lie his way out of being in Court. This is not his podcast.
Shouldn't we also acknowledge the constant lies from the parents? Scarlett Lewis claimed Jesse was killed in the hallway, which is false and it's well documented that she knew this was false. Maybe if they had been honest to begin with, this whole ridiculous hoax theory never would've happened in the first place. You can't lie and then wonder why people don't trust what you say.
He doesn’t lie. The guy has a lot of fluff type crap, but his reporting is honest.
@@thomasrudder9639 hes public enemy number one but alex has always eaten that up. he loves it actually
@@thomasrudder9639 he has lied thousands of times and you know it
Shame on you
@@martinvickers7349 the guy has broken more stories and exposed more government tyranny than anyone.
Let this man be an example for all the conspiracy theorists out there. You can think what you want. But defamatory remarks on a national level are unacceptable.
Just so you know, "This Man" and others like him, have inspired me and a generation of people to question anything.
Go have your 4th booster.
What’s damages do they have?
AJ's lies of decades are finally catching up with him.
Yeah tell it to Snowden, Manning, Assange. Let THOSE NAMES be an example FOR YOU not to believe ANYTHING this administration says. Or ANY OTHER administration for that matter. 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑
@@josephgriffin2388 1 million percent correct sir! Matt Mayo, anything to say? Or u going to put ur head in the sand like an ostrich?
To make this quick and easy to understand - the attorney and his clients are LIARS and the judge isn't having any of their shenanigans.
However easy you think you are making it...the Jones sheeple will refuse to get it.
Thank you so much for your work. !!
Nice to see a judge who knows her stuff, has done her homework on the detail, and is on the ball.
Where would the judicial system be if all judges were like her?
Well, I'd bet some judges would be individually, less wealthy then.
She is a joke really, having the court video tape the sidebar is what you call a good judge?
@@johnraiti9867 tell me, what exact words were they saying during the sidebar?
@@johnraiti9867 broadcasted/recorded civil trials usually don't turn off cameras for sidebars (probably would be a state law, but I've watched civil trials from many different states and never seen a video feed turned off for sidebar). It's all on the record anyways. The point of a sidebar is for the jury not to hear, which they obviously can't since none of us can. There's no issue with the sidebar being video recorded.
My sibling works for an attorney and lots of processes are left up to the para-legals or legal secretaries to do. You can really f-up if you don't file something or send out letters timely etc. I bet someone's going to get chewed out after this. Feel bad for them because a para-legal/legal secretary's job is full of attention to detail. My ADD couldn't hack that type of job. I would have been fired early on! 🤣
If I might add one small point - it's everybody's job to assure things are filed in a timely manner. An attorney that can't cut it will always dump his responsibility on his paralegals. Most of the people I went through law school with weren't analytical enough to be lawyers and wasted a lot of time chasing side issues. One way you can tell is if they spend too long on cross and don't understand the value of making three points or less. Juries only remember so much. Use your time for better things.
But we can use that ADD I have ADHD .
That makes me extremely skilled at fast level differentiations in Machine code. And are faster at solving programming codes that create a problem in Software.
I’m maybe 3 times faster than my colleagues.
But then there are something basic at keeping my apartment clean and tidy is something I Can’t even comprehend or do.
So yes we have obstacles very big obstacles that seems so basic for other normal people.
But they can’t do what I do. So I have had to just hire a Cleaner that comes 2 times a week.
I'm a paralegal at a civil defense firm. We do not have doctorates, attorneys do. They are the ones that have to answer to the Bar Association, not paralegals. It is the attorneys responsibility to make sure the rules of civil procedure are followed. Paralegals do not practice law, we cannot ultimately be held responsible for these kinds of mistakes.
Also, I find my ADHD to be an asset when it comes to my career. You have to be able to juggle 10 different things at once and switch tasks/focus at the drop of a hat.
@@h.hickenanaduk8622 Your clients are lucky to have you. The right person for the job does wonders for any profession.
@@commonsense31 I hear you. Same here. My house is not organized but I have a great system at work. I will say though 'small details' get by sometimes but I don't work a job that relies on the small details, which for me is a good thing and for whoever those small details make big impacts.
Lock him up! We'll see if he is going to be a bully in prison.
The defense is using a patently dishonest argument; being that they didn’t use it, so it doesn’t exist. BS ……
Defense is trying to 🕺🕺🕺but he has no legs. He accepted a client that’s known to be in non-compliance for the simplest of compliance requests. So… judge did what had to be done.
I hope Alex is paying these lawyers in “horses” because that’s about what they may deserve
Or more likely, no one wants to represent him because they think the case isn’t winnable. No attorney wants to be on the losing side in court. 😏
Ha, ha, ha!!
Omg I laughed so hard
@@truethat774 what does it matter if the lawyer "looses" or not? He still gets paid either way.
@@webgirlrocks2934 The more cases they win, the more it does for their reputation. No one likes to lose.
So he loses and he wracks up another massive award he can't pay
There is no "prosecution". You don't understand what is going on here.
Educate yourself before you repeat nonsense.
All of his money is in an annuity it is immune from court in bankruptcy sanctions.
With a bit of luck he'll be living under an overpass with the other bums begging for spare change soon
@@canny_linguist nope
@@allprolemontonz8448 Wrong.
Sanctions need to be the entire legal fees up to that point and the evidentiary one.
My first impression, from these moments about the sanctions and Google Analytics and the failure to file something is that the Court is bending over backward, but the Defendant and his counsel are trying to play "hide and seek" with the required disclosures, and the Court is on top of what's real--which appears to be, like in the previous case, that the failure to provide discovery about profits is intentional and violates the rules. The Defense counsel is cool, and I don't know what kind of community is hearing this case, but his repeated weakly stated excuse that he is "relying on what he's been told by his client" is like forfeiting and winking to the Court that his client is fully aware of what he's doing and doesn't care what he's supposed to do. And if that's all they can say on these issues, that portends we might be in for another big win against Jones. This strategy of letting a default happen by not giving discovery sounds like its coming from Jones, who believes he knows what jurors, like his listeners, think. He thinks he's better of pretending he can't fight, so he lets the default happen. He's surely relying on the publicity that will keep the faith amongst his most ardent followers. And clearly, he's believing bankruptcy will also help him. He should fear the bankruptcy court. They can simply say they are going to look back in time before he filed. This Plaintiff's lawyer is very aggressive and, most times and in most places, smart and very aggressive trial lawyers are appreciated by jurors.
Year one of law school: The court speaks though its docket. If a required pleading isn't filed with the court, the court cant and wont consider it.
Alex didn’t hand over the information because Alex is a messy boy...😱
Where did Jones find this lawyer in a cracker jack box 🤣🤣🤣🤣
My part-time dislexia read the title as “stunningly caviar”. I was like huh???? What in the legal mumbo jumbo?
Something seemed fishy to you, huh? Lol
@@alexsnow3319 Don't egg him on...
This judge is the bomb! She knows their game play.
I love this judge so far!!!!
After this, Jones lawyer went and sold Greatful Dead shirts from the back of his car.
Lol the case just started and it's already going to he a clown show 😂 can't wait for him to lose again
And the clown show continues
Can't wait to hear that good old Alex talked about google Analytics in text messages or emails found on his phone because his incompetent lawyer turned over the entire phone and when given the chance DIDN'T try to withdraw or protect the phone image.
You should watch today's testimony. Hilarious !
I wonder if the jan 6 committee has an interest in the google Analytics, text messages etc etc 😳😳
He's not a lawyer, he's a little league umpire. His meals at the snack shack should be half price
Jones definitely pays for the cheapest lawyers available 😂
it's almost like this guy was only hired last week
That Super-Male Vitality money
Pays?!??!!??! 😂😂😂😂
Too bad she didn't get to hear the O.J. Simpson case!
Bahahahahah Alex is getting slapped all over the country. Love it.
Judge sounds like she has no time for Jones and her lame legal teams bullsh*t
Well I can’t blame her 😅 This is really a waste of time
This shouldn't even be a thing
Now the audio on this trial is 1000xs better than the last few from this channel. I can actually hear what people are saying. Although I can also hear someone whispering near the mic.
Who shows up to court with a Racoon on their head?
I thought it was a dead cat.
Davy Crockett, of course! 😂
Judge: "I looked for the affidavit and didn't see it. Did you file it?"
Jones' Lawyer: "Yeah, totally, man."
Judge: "When?"
Jones' Lawyer: "Uh, yesterday?"
Judge: "Yesterday."
Jones' Lawyer: "Yeeeaahh...."
Judge: "Okay, let's look through everything you filed .... ... ... ... ... No, it's not here."
Jones' Lawyer: "Well hey man, lay off my case, I told em do it, but I guess they didn't do it, what you want me to tell ya???"
RIP all Jones' money
As a former paralegal, if he filed anything, he would be able to present a file-marked copy. When we file documents with the court, we take multiple copies and get them file-marked and send a file-marked copy to every lawyer and keep one in our file.
Any lawyer worth their salt would absolutely have a file-marked copy ready to present to the Judge, if it had just been filed the day before.
@@Mortibella You think it's possible that Jones' attorneys are TRYING to tank his case? That may be malpractice, sure, but listen to what they say, it's damning. The woman they put on the stand the other day admitted that Jones doesn't research anything, he just hears something somewhere, he likes it, so he repeats it on air. She admitted that he did it all for money. Jones is presumably paying these people to NOT put on a proper defense.
In your professional experience have you ever seen anything like this? Lawyers NOT actually defending their clients, but willingly laying it all out there for the public to see?
Maybe I'm just not seeing how impossible it would be to defend Jones, maybe they really have no options. Craziness...
@@johnsmithe4656 I have never seen anything like this and I was a paralegal for 20 years. But a lot of it is the client and the attorneys I worked for would not have tolerated Alex Jones’s BS and would have fired him as a client. I’m not sure how competent his attorneys are.
@@Mortibella "I’m not sure how competent his attorneys are."
Wait. Do you agree with my initial characterization of the conversation between the judge and Jones' attorney? I'm no lawyer but that's what I saw when watching the video. If that's even remotely correct then how can we possibly conclude that his lawyers are competent at all? The whole thing smacks of total incompetence, so much so that I suspect it's being done on purpose.
He needs to be put in prison for saying he killed all those children 🤬🤬🤬🤬
Watch him bob, watch him weave. Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive
You lost your case when you tried unsuccessfully, to "teach" the judge.
That defense attorney reminds me of a teenager a teenager that said: "The teacher didn't tell me there was a test tomorrow.
It's relevant when your client hides it for years claims he doesn't have this information and then his other attorney accidentally lets it loose now the information is out there and we have it we're going to use it I mean honestly he hid this information he was supposed to hand over and then lied about it again and again and again and again this man needs to go to jail for perjury I like can't take anymore of him.