Alex Jones' Lawyer Challenges Judge, Claims Ruling Has No Legal Basis
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2022
- Alex Jones' lawyer Norm Pattis challenged Judge Barbara Bellis' decision to deny his motion to play the Megyn Kelly interview, arguing that the judge has no legal basis. "There's no there is no legal basis stated. I'm entitled to that under the practice book," Pattis said. "I believe that he argued it for 20 minutes, and I think the record is clear attorney Pattis," Bellis responded.
#AlexJones #Defamation #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
The greatest challenge of this world is knowing enough about a subject to think you are right, but not knowing enough about the subject to know you are wrong…
Agree 100 % 🇨🇦
👍
Ironic
@@rufuslynx0001 Who was it?
You have this qoute a bit wrong. it is " One of the great challenges in this world is knowing enough about a subject to think you're right, but not enough about the subject to know you're wrong.” Quote by Neil DeGrasse Tyson
I love how all the Jones bots aren't in chat anymore. He stopped paying them 😂
You sound like a conspiracy theorist
@@fearlessleader8623 oh look one helpful little bot is still around 😂😂
@@nsxdarin you are sounding a lot like alex jones yourself...might need to get your head checked
Now it's just the Dem bots.
nsxdumin sounds like a frustrated conspiracy theorist.
Lol did Alex Jones hire a sovereign citizen lawyer?
Yes ! Yes he did !
That would be awesome!
I don't know but he looks like he reeks of the good green.
Sounds like you're getting a little nervous Mr hater of free speech
@@samuela9058 Alex Jones is free to speak however he wants. He is also free to suffer the social reprurcussion of false speech and harassment
"not happy with how he is portrayed on the internet"
yet these clowns have no problem spewing hateful lies about others
What lies? Name them.
Exactly. THEY have the right to worry about their image, while blatantly thinking they have the right to destroy someone elses image.
@@QUICKIRONS that his mother gave life to Satan ! Fact : Satan lies all the time and the evil and haters believe him . To you that's a lie ... Right !? .. be honest ... lol
Are you suggesting everyone has a right to sue people for publishing anything about them they don't like? People no longer have free speech? Who gets to decide what speech is considered allowed?
@@MindlessTurtle blatant lies from those that push Conspiracy theories for profit should be held accountable when they do considerable damage .
Lol.... This Alex Jones lawyer is running in place just like the old Road-runner cartoons.
Jones should cry as many tears as the plaintiffs have!
The fbi agent?
The parents didn't know who Jones was until 4 years later
Kangaroo court
@@ultimateflyfulThis is to establish how much he owes the parents/relatives of the victims, not to establish guilt or innocence. AJ's guilt was established in a previous trial.
@@ultimateflyful I salute our Aussie bretheren. Someone needed to take that empty nutsack down.
'my defendant is a sovereign citizen your honour'
Did he say that ?
@@deebhoymcw2120 not that I'm aware
This from the lawyer who asked to withdraw as Jones’s attorney….court denied.
No he didn't it's not the same lawyer as last time. Norm patty is a famous leftie free speech and civil rights lawyer. All he's arguing is the other side is using the interview in their questions therefore the jury should be allowed to view the video.
Can I ask you something about Alex Jones? Why do you take him seriously?
@@amillionlittledingdongs6768 because he has unfortunately been correct about quite a few of his theories.
@@willbeard4835 Please provide a few example, without referring to other conspiracy theory sites.
It is way to easy to say he has been proven correct without pointing to any single instance.
He was correct that leaders of the country were worshipping and performing mock sacrifices to a giant stone owl at bohemian grove. That was denied for years, he got that on camera.
He was talking about the bilderberg meetings for years, was constantly denied and ignored by the MSM, it is now openly admitted to. Before smartphones high speed internet connections he was spreading info on these things that were denied and ignored by the news. He was incredibly important in his day
He has already been convicted this is about the money is that right?
Yup
he lost another trial by not participating in it
100% and $50 million correct.
He wasn't convicted, it's a civil trial lol.
No. This is a second lawsuit. By additional families.
Alex's old hippie lawyer in a funeral suit is gonna lose this one.
They already lost the case by default a while ago
This is about how much in damages they’re gonna pay
@Carlos Spicyweiner hahahahahaha
@Carlos Spicyweiner no one needs to show you anything, Carlos. Sit down.
He's actually very competent, got many objections sustained, but Alex continues to answer. 😆
@@thainacristina1040 seems Spicywhiner deleted his pro Jones comments ... lol
This judge always has a look on her face that says "I'd murder defense counsel with a hammer if I legally could" XD
Women should not become judge
You can hear the emotion, she cannot cut it off ,and therefore it is impossible for her to be non bias .Woman are wired differently then men are lts a biological fact ,they just cannot put their emotions on hold ,where as men can completely shut their emotions off ,and they can do so very easily.
Y'all using the above post that I thought was very funny as a posting place for woman bashing is ridiculous. Y'all need counseling. You came from a woman so woman bashing is non rational and "emotional" thinking. Women are and can be great judges.
@@RGTFLA85 God created men and women to perform separate yet equally important roles.When you see a gender role reversal taking place in a society as we have for the past 50 years, it never ends well for that society. God never intended woman to be in positions of authority over the men .
@@nightflight1454 you sound ridiculous
His lawyer is irrational n unprofessional as Alex jones himself
ur a npc
You know nothing about law
Wrong clown! 🤡🌍🥴
His Judge is slow
Alex Jones is no worse than the lying idiots from the MSM, they should be held responsible for the lies and damage they do on a daily basis.
Should have entered the interview into evidence during discovery. The judge has no obligation to allow any particular thing into evidence at this point in the trial. People can clutch their pearls and call bias all the want, but it’s the reality of how our legal system works.
Exactly. If they wanted to have their way, they should have played by the same rules everyone else does. But they chose to be shady and not forthright, and are shocked when they are now kept on a short leash as a result.
if you were on the defendant’s side would you still be thinking this way or would you be complaining about how unjust it is?
Willful ignorance
@@zach3955 Even if I suffered a traumatic brain injury that caused me to be on Alex Jones' side in this or any other matter, I would still have to agree that, under the laws governing court procedures, lawyers cannot start introducing evidence after the discovery period.
@@zach3955 I am on Alex Jones's side. I don't think he should be censured for his free speech, and I don't personally believe what he said about Sandy Hook is defamation. HOWEVER, if your lawyers don't abide by the rules that the court sets forth for proper procedure, then the defense has only themselves to blame when the judge comes down hard on them. Their actions and attitude towards the procedure was unwise, because now they have negotiated away any chance they had to have a serious look at Alex Jones's actions as being constitutional.
The extra hairball on the lawyer's back gives me goosebumps. Thinking a little about cats and vomit balls.
Lol
Now, I can never unsee that - lol
Looks like two rats nests on his back.
Does no one watching this actually know the law? EVERY DECISION by a judge MUST BE BACKED UP WITH LEGAL BASIS. Alex Jone's attorney can now move for a mistrial for judicial misconduct .....
“We might win”
Yeah, and I might have a date with this judge tonight.
You're the wrong gender.
Yeah, I laughed so hard at that as well. This ship is going down, moving the deck chairs ain't gonna help.
.. for the right price .
I laughed at that as well...Win what?? He already lost by default
Yes and the judge who rolled her eyes at that idea screams of impartiality. LOL more kool-aid?
Jones can say all he wants. Some of what he says just might have consequences.
you mean like weapons of mass destruction that killed millions? Those people have answered. Every news station screamed it. Not one held liable.....strange....
Since when in the USA? Trying to sue someone over hurt feelings is pure communism at its worst. The prosecuting lawyers and these families trying to make millions over free speech from comments and opinions over the deaths of children is pretty sick. Oh and an FBI Agent too. WTF is happening to the USA? The USSA is what.
Words have consequences? In the USA? If that’s the case we’re, in 2022, are no different than the ccp.
You and I may not like what AJ says, but I would defend his right to say it. I’m not American, I’m English, and our free speech has been obliterated! Send a tweet of your opinions about ANYTHING considered minority, like trans issues, and you get a visit from police, maybe even arrested. If you back people being silenced because feelings are hurt, you are sending yourself down a very murky street. You have amendments for a reason, don’t let anyone trample them.
This whole trial is to legitimize punishing speech and dissenting views. Look up “Alex jones exposed.” Jones is a fed. Stop taking the bait.
Dudes ponytail is disgusting and apparently it affects his hearing because the judge told him no three times but he refused to listen.
So the judge is making an arbitrary ruling not a ruling of law????
What good are judges if they don’t use the law to enforce their convictions?????
That's not what happened.
The defense attorney feels he's losing the trial, so, he's inserting that he wants to include the megan Kelly video.
Right?!
Think she lost a Rock, Paper, Scissors match?
😂 he’s a 🤡, he should be disbarred for that pony tail 😂
So does Jones think what he said to Megyn Kelly means he will pay less to the defendants?
“We might win!”
-Alex Jones lawyer after default judgement
Wait. How can they win when the judgement was already defaulted? What the heck?
@@MnJiman yeah lol that was my thought as well
Jones' lawyers should be charging him extra. Defending the indefensible has got to cost more.
Makes them look bad because they can’t win this not a chance all because what Alex has done
Bring on Ted Cruz to read 'Green Eggs and Ham' as a filler.
And then end all this nonsense! Just get to how many millions the psychopath has to pay! Because he's got trial #3 to get to!
it is defensible its called free speech. This is going to the supreme court
It seems that people who don't believe what they are saying, but say it anyway to control the dialogue is quite popular now.
It's the Democrat way!
@@johnbeltron8787 LOL at least you d*mb f*ck right wingers are good for a laugh
Sprinkle in some of those Alternative Facts and there you have it.
@@100perdido Like those alternate facts that aren't so alternate and keep ending up with Republicans in court. Did you really have to make 3 accounts to have have this conversation with yourself though?
Sue this guy until he needs food stamps!
This is a desperate lawyer failing miserably.
Don't watch clips watch the trial. All he's saying is the plaintiff is using the interview in their questions therefore the interview should be allowed to be used by the defence. Furthermore this lawyer is a well known leftie lawyer who believes strongly in free speech.
It’s a good actor playing the role of a crappy lawyer
This is one of America’s most successful trial attorney
This dude seems like a killer, dunno what yall are talking about
Oh he’s a bada$$. He’s got a ponytail, lol.
Unpopular speech isn’t the same thing as screaming lies about dead children and their families.
Yes, it is. You now are the a hole.
how can it be lies when during the time you don't know? It's called question things you've seen and heard to better understand an event. look at 911...since questioning that, look what we've all discovered? pretty horrifying wouldn't you say? also repeating SOMEONE ELSE's words is harding intentionally lying lol. Do you know how good science works? questing things no matter how ridiculous they sound. What does it even matter, you are conditioned to react a certain way, especially depending on the person and their political preferences. You don't care about the kids and neither does the court lol
You are a liar
@@WinX_io shhh harvey! You dont want to shatter her whole reality...she wont be able to handle the truth
I'm willing to hear out your argument. Explain your reasoning
Its truly a sight to behold how some people can wear Shameless the way a superhero wears underwear over pants.
Dude reminds me of the "men's rights" attorney who attempted to assassinate a female judge.
You mean the hitman that killed the Epstein money laundering judge?
I'd like a pair of scissors!
🤣
A lawnmower would probably work better
His lying is what got him in this situation.
What is it specifically that makes you think Alex Jones “was lying” as pertains to what is at issue in this trial? Did you get your information from Globalist’s’ controlled media, Facebook, or some other form of Social Media? Are you saying you saw things with your own eyes through media? Isn’t that what “Conspiracy Theorists” say also? Do you think the omission of facts may have altered what you believe?
To get an idea what those who hate Alex Jones believe; do they think there were WOMB in Iraq or Building Seven at the World Trade Center on 911 was suspicious?
Are there other Conspiracy theories that Alex Jones has advanced that you disagree with and if so what are they?
Just trying to see how Alex Jones haters think.
👏🏻 exactly
Charged with a crime for lying? What's your life history of lies you have told?
@@billhartman5120 I haven't told lies that could get me sued. Lying is a pet peeve of mine and I would rather tell the truth. What about you bill?
@@billhartman5120 LOL you d*mb f*cks love spewing your utter stupidity
Razzle dazzle, fake it til you make it, and the tantrums
'I'm supposed to defend Alex Jones'.... ooh, yeah that was your first mistake.
Jones, he better just call Saul Goodman as a lawyer
Jones has had every break he's going to get. ENOUGH of this.
Hi Casey!
You think you're the judge, jury and executioner.
@@rwdchannel2901 😂 What are you talking about ?
@@prumbuggel Something too hard for you to understand.
@@rwdchannel2901 Because it's NONSENSE.
For note: If you want to have a normal trial... you have to participate in trial. You can't refuse to respond to discovery, respond with lies claiming you provided the requested records except not doing that, and go forward as if you have any right to a normal trial. You forfeit that when you act in bad faith and do not participate in discovery like a human being.
Jones team provided millions of pages of discovery, how can you say he "refused to respond to discovery"? They're using discovery as evidence in this trial phase. Get the facts before commenting.
*_You can't refuse to respond to discovery_* Are you lying or are you repeating a lie? You know not of what you type.
@@joelockhart6986 They can when the guilt of the person in that regard was established in a previous trial and this ones just for damages. You're the one that doesn't know what you're talking about.
@@joelockhart6986 What about that statement is a lie ?
@@prumbuggel Jones submitted EVERYTHING he was ask to and then some. WAY more than any person in his situation. According to Robert Burns an attorney with knowledge of the case.
Alex Jones is trying to get out the judges ruling. He's as guilty as sin.
Hes not guilt hes liable.
Guilty of what?
Guilty of what exactly??
So far from what I looked into, 'Heresay' is exempt when the subject matter, which is strangely not allowed to be used by the Defense, has already brought up in trial, by the plaintiff. This is on record so that's why this activist judge can't just dismiss the claim against her ruling.
I truly believe that Alex Jones gets his lawyers on craigslist
😂😂😂
I mean, that's how he hires his staff at Infowars. Rob Dew literally admitted as much in Jones' "doumentary".
they are all goofy past guests on his "show".
Mansplaining to the judge never helps.
I wouldn't want this judge.
She set this up for another trial or to get over turned. Waste of time, money and resources.
How about don't talk about the shooting of people's children. Stop it. Have some class. They've been through enough.
You just did. People acting like talking about something is equivalent to the murdering of children is crazy.
Lock him up AND bankrupt the Monster
We feel the same way about you.
He did nothing wrong
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can hurt Mari D'Ambrosia.
@@TheBlackB0X excuse me?!?
Get out of our country. Leave.
This lawyer has AN IMPOSSIBLE JOB. Defend the indefensible
True. That’s why he tried to get away, but was unsuccessful.
1st amendment is indefensible?
@@sana-cm7oc using his media company to spread lies that caused damages is, indefensible
@@rustyminer what damages?
@@sana-cm7oc the damages caused by Alex Jones.
You believe in holding people accountable, I hope
He lost by default... He had an opportunity to present his case and he refused so he received a default judgement. What a clown show.
Present his case? Did you even watch the first trial? The judge told him he was not allowed to speak like 100 times. I'm not an Alex Jones fan, and he is a huge loudmouth, but you are supposed to be able to explain things in your own words during court.
This is a witch hunt for a mongoloid hunchback. Great work everyone. The hunchback said words and now he owes us million. Welcome to America.
If you want to say he did not provide discovery that is fine, but to say he had a chance to present his case is not true. Since he "didn't provide discovery" he was declared guilty without a trial.
@@jasonfutrell8560 that is his chance to present his case, discovery is one step of many when it comes to presenting a case. If you want a chance to present your case you have to partake in discovery.
@@jasonfutrell8560 are you not contradicting yourself?
@@kbob9625 Its a falsehood that he did not provide discovery. He provided millions of documents and several depositions. Because he did provide "the smoking gun", which he didn't have, they decided to default him.
Jones already lost by default. What is this all about? I'm thinking this is all and only about the amount to be awarded, and not about anything else.
Well that’s exactly what it is. He was found quilty this is the penalty phase of the trial.
It's about him playing the victim, yet again, when he's done nothing RIGHT for decades.
i hate free speech too
@@financialdecimation give me more strawmen. They sustain me.
@@financialdecimation Yeah it starts to manny problems.
Alex Jones have chosen to ignore the justice system, his obligations when it comes to discovery etc in more than one trial... If he actually engaged and complied instead he could have had a lot more to say for himself. But instead... once again... we see complete disregard for the law and procedure and then when the trial starts they all of a sudden have a lot of wishes and wants.
Because apparently US laws don't apply to wealthy people. Well Jones is finding out the hard way that it does.
Alex Jones has chosen…
He gave them more than they asked for.
@@AntiNeocons No, He didnt. He claims he did till he is blue in the face, because that is the only way his supporters will believe him and continue to support him, it also allows him to continue to weave his false narratives into every fabric of this trial. He lost his ability to say he handed over "everything" when he was defaulted and then again during the first trial when it was shown he didnt.
@@williamwilson6499 Alex Jones, he who hath chosen
Enjoy losing, forever, Alex.
By the way, how many more of these has Jones got to go through?
its not about free speech ,he can say anything he wants to ,its about the harm of what he said did to the people.why dont they judge and lawyers just go ahead and get that out of the way so the defence wont keep going there
"I don't want to relitigate this, but that's exactly what I'm doing."
They’ll win the appeal due to judge bias.
@@keithb6717 And Japan will retake China! /sarcasm
@@jktolford8272
Really? What’s your source?
@@keithb6717 Info Wars /sarcasm
@@jktolford8272
I wouldn’t know. Like you, I’ve never seen infowars. Unless you can provide a link and prove you’re not a liar....
9:01 "We could still win." Major props to the judge for not laughing out loud.
He did that for the record to show bias. The judge cannot think they have already lost already and claim to be impartial. If you were in middle of murder trial and judge said, YOU GOING TO HANG that would be all you need for mistrial. How does she know they will appeal? Because she knows THEY LOST in her mind already. The decision was made WITH NO TRIAL. Jesus loves you! Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be SAVED!
I think he was trying to trip the judge into showing a bias before the trial was completed
@@davidson2727what Right. That's why I commended her for not laughing. It's a clumsy attempt, at best.
When a lawyer can't afford a haircut you should probably go to the next one.
He's trying to be Tony Serra, who I met because he was one of my co-defendant's lawyers.
if a man running for a federally elected office only wears hoodies, be afraid.
Well, Alex Jones's lawyer for the trial in Texas was Lionel Hutz, this time in Connecticut it's Comic Book Man, and when he goes to appeal it will be Ned Flanders.
@@sunshinehoward9649 Yes because the suit and tie guy is always to be trusted lol!!!
Your idiocy is astounding. 1 moment you are judging a guy as incompetent because he has a ponytail. Next you say just because someone is in a suit and tie they should always be trusted. You win the darwin award for the day.
I bet that judge said to herself, "Something about that ponytail screams 😱DRAG ME!" 🤣😂🤣
AGAIN, trying to go for a mistrial!!!! Always the victim.. PATHETIC!!
All they ever are. Always happening to them and not because of them.
Again another internet keyboard lawyer. This is easily a mistrail. Notice how the judge refuses to put an answer on the record that she would be held to account for?
@@macdan22 - HAHA... It's my opinion
@@Leslie-karren guess what your opinion and this judge have in common? Both are wrong.
@@macdan22 - nope. Too bad her opinion is the law, and my opinion bothers you!!! Clearly don't have any issues supporting someone who lies about the murder is innocent children, you're opinion means NOTHING!!! I win...
What does the lawyer mean with winning the case? He already lost. The question is just how high.
They can issue no no damages still on jury. That would be a win. But the fact she said there be appeal shows her bias which will be on the record now. You can't decide before the trial is over.
Judge looks like she ready to step down there and kick this guy in the nuts for being a fool, but she cool and professional, much repect! 🤘
She’s been very professional, I think the defence lawyer is trying to antagonise her to make her look bad
Lets call her as on the stand with Raggedy Anne.
are democrat voting pedophiles the only people who watch this network
I don't understand which part of the judge is professional...?
The lawyer’s hair says everything we really need to know about him.
I'm so so glad that all his attorneys are so so bad. It's well deserved.
this judge is very patient, I would have told defense council to be quiet and sit down after she dismissed the motion.
Just like a dictator lol
She's a disgrace to the LAW.
Alex Jones "believes" his Free Speech does not come with consequences, and he is now finding out that it does.
Most people couldn't really understand the travesty of the sham that's happening here.
Shes not confident about her rulings and she is unable to cut off her emotions .This case will be studied in law schools after this and this judge will be the focus
This guy is tons better that the Jones counsel in Texas … wrong, of course … but way better
Would you hired him to defend you?
You know they are floundering when the lawyer is simply playing for a mistrial
One that's well deserved.
Ponytail dude is trying to tell judge how to rule. He has come down a long way!!
youve never watched a trial before have you
@@muzien87 are your lips glued to the tv?
Ponytail dude seems to speak well and sounds like a badass amongst the pasty soy-criminals. How ironic.
Ponytail dude is a very clever lawyer....
You just don’t get it .,,, he is racking up instance after instance she is showing her bias for the record , she even used the jury as an excuse not to address her required paper work because she didn’t want to address his accuracy on required appeals paperwork or verbal adherence to protocol
Never trust a full grown man with a ponytail!
The defence just said they might win! No you have lost by default because your cliet is a Doosh! This trial is about damages!
LOVE the typo. You can either put the "n" in or take the "i" out.
It could go either way...The latter one might not make much sense but it sounds funny.
Never heard so many “and ummm’s” from a trial lawyer 😂😂😂😂
If the tail wags, I'll fall out of my chair.
It’s funny to see a judge be angry but not in an unprofessional way
She's a woman that's unprofessional enough. She does not conduct herself properly
jones used his "A" team for the first trial
now hes skipped the "B C D &E" teams and gone with the "F" troop
It's not F troop. It's Fu*ktail !
If a lawyers trousers are bunching up at the ankle it means they take no pride in themselves and are lazy. If they cant be bothered to have the trousers tailored and want to shortcut by buying off the rack then they sure will take shortcuts in your case.
Dude has a dope weave. Props for the source of the "hair involved" and whoever was missing in braiding it.
Whenever I hear AJs lawyer, I think of attorney Lionel Hutz from the Simpsons. But then I think, "that isn't fair to Lionel Hutz".
If our country allows these kinds of clowns to argue such frivolous arguments then we are truly screwed
That's what I've been saying...
NEVER hire a lawyer with a pony tail. If he has a double bubble like this, run.
Desperately trying to defend the undefendable.
Wow, I just watched the just tell him the other day to stop talking about Megan Kelly, yet here he is again. This guy wants to go to jail.
Jury is not present. Duh.
@Brett M
Your bias is showing
@Brett M what are your credentials? Pray tell
@@keithb6717 Good to see they left a couple cans in your six pack.
@Brett M I understand what the judge said. He he lucky she didn't hold him in contempt.
Challenge: anyone who claims judge is biased, layout an objective explanation
Following for entertainment purposes
I'm here because I want to hear this.
Well I mean c'mon. We all know that isn't going to happen. "tEh juDgE iS bIaseD bEcUZ rEaSOnS!!11"
She literally says "i assume there will be an appeal"
Lawyer: "there might be or we might win"
Judge: "so there will be an appeal"
Very clearly implying that shes expecting them to lose. Not to mention acting like child at every point the defense makes while giving the prosecutors everything they ask for
I recommend that you watch the trial for proof of bias. Duh.
Dude, 1970 wants their hair back
I don't ever like courthouses around the world.
What was said on another show has no place in this trial. Alex Jones and his council thought that they could draw this out forever by refusing to comply with court ordered discovery. He has been found liable for his claims by way of default judgment and whatever was said on Meghan Kelly only serves to confuse the jury about if the statements were untrue. This is about how much he owes the families for his claims which have already been adjudicated as defamatory. It’s really that easy.
The only reason they are able to get Jones on statute of limitations is because Kelly brought it up in an interview. So literally this interview is relevant. If they didnt have the Kelly interview, after she promised not to ask him about Sandy hook. If that hadnt happened they would have passed statute of limitations
@@mirandastephens4586 it's certainly relevant in the preliminary fault trial but Jones has already been found liable. He cannot at this juncture bring up such claims because that phase has ended. Had he complied with the court ordered discovery he certainly would have been able to use this information. Statute of limitations is only relevant to if you are liable, not how much you are liable for if you are liable
@@mirandastephens4586 I don't believe that applies here. The statute is based on when the subject learned about the accusations or within a reasonable time, not when they were initially made. I would need to look up all the dates, but the lawsuits obviously were put in motion long before these trials, probably even before Meagan Kelly. It takes a while for certain cases to come to trial.
Sandy Hook was a cia operation. Come get me, punks!
Do you pretend to be an expert on every video you watch, or just legal ones? Something tells me you are the annoying guy with no friends. But there is still hope. It involves the work of actually reading and educating yourself. (Anyone who thinks court is "really that easy" surely is not a lawyer, and probably unemployed for that matter).
That judge is really chasing her own tail. Unbelievable.
Whats that rats nest ponytail bun combo he's got going on in the back? 🤣
A show trial of the highest order he never even said these peoples names this is a travesty of justice
Ah yes, trying to claim complete bias because they didn't enter the interview into evidence during discovery. They did not do the homework given by the courts, you've already ruined your clients chances at this being in your favor at any point because you did not do your job.
You're confused. this interview was the plaintiff's own exhibit.
They entered it but say they CAN'T USE it! Unheard of! Which is why he demanded LEGAL reason and she didn't have one!
@@MichaelAChristian1 She didn't have to state the legal reason if there is a legal reason. She does not have to state every single law to someone who does not understand the law. That is not how the courts work. This is a terrible lawyer who is thinks he is really smart. If he doesn't understand basic legal principles that is on him. They have the right to appeal of course, however if there is a legal basis (whether or not it was said to him by the judge) they will not win the appeal. That is just more money out of the clients pocket. Alex Jones is being played by a terrible lawyer.
@@MnJiman "If there is a legal reason"? Lol. What? Yes she has to as he pointed out. Do you think it is ok if that happens to you? You are not allowed to say you are innocent. You are not allowed to cite your bankruptcy. You not allowed to show your many apologies YEARS AGO. And so on.
if his arguments are as good as his f@@ed up pony tail Alex will be screwed
Alex is unhappy? Try some Bone Broth.
Theres a new sheriff in town. This lawyer is much better than his last lawyer and very effective.
@Null Pointer You can stand up to a judge if the law is on your side. She's had to back down on several points and control her seething throughout the trial because he's been legally correct. As effective an advocate as he can be given the circumstances imo
So he’s predicting that there will be a mistrial. This lawyer is overly convinced of his great power of mind.
NO, actually the judge has demonstrated her bias by assuming that there will be a guilty verdict by which an appeal will be filed. Complete BS
He's already guilty by default. This is punishment phase of the process.
@@kenbaustin4533 ahh yes one of his puppets. Do you always talk out your a** by someone else shoving their hand into you?
@@kenbaustin4533 is the prosecutor not allowed to appeal?
@@priscillaastling8707 The prosecutor has the right to retry in the case of a hung jury or mistrial but once found not guilty it would be double jeopardy to retry on a charge that you have been acquitted for.
This is just a hail mary attempt to find a reason to appeal. If they wanted to try the case, as he suggested, then they should have focused on this trial from the beginning instead of playing games. This is what losing looks like.
Nope. This is how you preserve something for an appeal when a judge hands you unassailable grounds for an appeal that will absolutely get any verdict against your client overturned. I'm UT Knoxville College of Law. Where did you attend law school?
@@agb1953 We'll see if it plays out that way. Only wannabe lawyers feel the need to explain their credentials.
@@toditron Spare me your amateur psychology nonsense. The world doesn't really run on cliches. It's blatantly obvious that I knew why the lawyer was getting what he needed to onto the record for purposes of an appeal, and you didn't have a clue. He wasn't trying to "find a reason to appeal" like you declared. He was preserving present grounds for an appeal.
@@agb1953 Sounds like fun. Thanks.
The only thing he should argue for, is a brush.🙄
Norm isn't even good at pretending to be lawyer, let alone acting as one.
Defense lawyer stuttering, correcting his own words repeatedly, indicates he is a terrible public speaker not in control of his own speech.
Are you out of your mind?
@The Majority Speaks 8:00
I’m guessing these at best these are rigged comments 😂 at worst definitely not familiar with law to the point they don’t understand what he’s doing .., here is a tip never ever never under any circumstances Judge an attorney’s ability based on speech patterns , grammar or feigned stupidity if so your falling for it 😂
He's just frustrated because he feels like he had a good point.
You want to see an example of poor pubic speking skills? Look up Norm patis stand up.
Drag 'em outta there by his ponytail! 👋
violence is never the answer...oh wait you're a democrat! You love violence upon those you don't agree with
His lawyer is actually 2 hamsters operating a dead man.
Classic.
This attorney is so disheveled it’s unnerving
Must be nice to have a judge that sides with the plaintiffs and rules that the very evidence the plaintiffs referenced in a lawsuit can't be allowed in by the defense.
If it were exactly the same, they wouldn't need to enter it as another exhibit. Sounds like the defense is trying to introduce the full 50-minute interview (likely Jones repeating his lies over & over to Megyn Kelly, not adding any facts) where the defense offered shorter excerpts. Jones's lawyer should be able to work with those same excerpts.
2:34 did he really say he will make a motion for a mistrial 😂😂 this is a zoo at least the judge doesn’t take any nonsense
I can't take any lawyer seriously when they have a ponytail like that
Very patient judge very patient.i would have told to sit down and shut up
Mr. Grandstander, Norm Pattis clearly states @ 2:50 that "Exaggeration and Motive was his team's defense"....that alone shows the cavalier handling of this case by the Defense. Their Goal is to bamboozle, tap dance and side swipe the Jury with a bunch of miss-directed legal jargon in hopes of getting JUST ONE PERSON to Tap out and throw in the towel for a mistrial.
I don't know, he seems to be missing his top hat and cane. 😂
@@JB-yb4wn 🤣 He really does remind me of a 1960's Hippie Lawyer who just keeps "Fighting The Man"....Salute
@@TheStuport
Turn on, tune in and drop out. Groovy, man. 🤣
@@JB-yb4wn He might just have known Abbie Hoffman and The Gang! I'm guessing though that Norm is at least getting paid well by Alex to put on this Dog and Pony Show!
@@TheStuport
**ahem** dog and ponytail show. 😁
*All of this is a charade.*
Is this the same lawyer that sent EVERY text from jones's phone to the other lawyer?
I don't think the texts were the problem.
The medical records of the plaintiffs were, though.
Calling a liar, a liar is illegal????