Alex Jones’ Lawyer Presents His Closing Argument in CT Defamation Trial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2022
- Alex Jones’ attorney Norm Pattis presents his closing arguments in Jones’ Connecticut defamation trial.
#AlexJones #Defamation #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Alex's lawyer reminds me of my pot dealer in the seventies...
I'm guessing you knew a lot of them?
A few, it was the seventies... were you there? Now it's legal... so I guess you need to clarify. @@2KCamaroZ28SS
@@2KCamaroZ28SS If you were alive before the 80's, and weren't smoking pot, I don't even know what you were doing with your life.
@@The_Cadaver Well, that is one thing we can agree on, LoL.
There could be a reason for that. He would have been around then.
Attorney Pattis, who tried to remove himself from Jones' defense and was denied by the judge, tells the jury there's no place he'd rather be than defending Jones in that courtroom.
So
@@JohnnyBGood11 so he's lucky he isn't under oath when making an opening/closing argument
@@andrewriley2922 so
Meanwhile his other lawyer, media star Bobby Barnes, is out giving a press conference with AJ, the two of them having flown back to Connecticut to do so...as AJ is thinking about filing a malpractice suit against Barnes.
Do you even have any idea of what your talking about? Why did Attorney Pattis ask to be removed?? 1 simple reason, his client wasnt communicating with anyone. It wasnt because he didnt want to take Jones as a client...it was because how can you represent someone if they arent communicating? He was exactly the Attorney Jones needed...and he proved it right here in the courtroom.
If I was the defense atty, the last thing I would want the jury to hear is that man's screaming voice before they go back to jury room.
Karen
@@JohnAdams-mu7xd Your mom is here?
You know you're desperate when you're reciting the Lord's prayer before you've even left the courtroom.
@@Altitudes That was in bad taste but the 44:20 Cha-Ching was something. These people are looking to punish this man who caused them, their families, their friends, all that love, hurt. For what, to boost his PROFITS! Just a social media grifter, marketing his con. My preference is the kitty flushing the toilet. I hope they take everything he has.
Yes it was truly a buffoonery tactic. He is already guilty as sin, hope they take every last penny he has.
I read somewhere in the comments on another trial, that a closing argument should be like story. Start at the beginning, middle, and finally the end. Most importantly, be comfortable and confident when public speaking.
That the gullible follow this man shows their desperation and lack of independent research.
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 EXACTLY!!!
Bingo!
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 uh-huh.
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 I've spent several years researching Jones himself. Believe me or don't, but my research tells me he's an abusive, greedy, self- aggrandizing charlatan who feeds off the fears of the ignorant, mentally vulnerable population who listens to him.
The gullible are the ones that swallow the mainstream media’s narrative funded by THEIR TAX DOLLARS instead of choosing to listen to independent journalism that dares to question that narrative(even when all their lies are being exposed). Imagine a mafia stealing your money and using it to fund a broadcasting operation to program, control and propagandize you and saying that the opposing side is the gullible one. It’s truly easier to fool someone than convince them they’ve been fooled.
So his first move was to show Jones lying about his previous lying? That goes to help credibility.
Amen.
This case is not about 'credibility' but to determine how much money is appropriate for damages sustained by the plaintiffs.
How do you know Jones is lying?
@@zaphodisgod In that video, he is claiming that he never said Sandy Hook was a hoax, and that he was just questioning. But the past 2 trials have shown numerous clips of him saying exactly that it was a hoax.
@@zaphodisgod How can you be a rational person and defend AJ. You can’t.
44:00 where judge stops clock bc attorney is talking about plaintiffs attorneys.
She did to to Plaintiffs attorney too.....if the vid was longer, you'd have scene it. Everything being equal...
Plaintiffs attorneys made plenty of personal comments about Pattis.
thing is..Pattis wasnt lying !
@@bairleewoak6440 it’s clear this law & crime channel is a shill for leftist court activism.
Well, she stops the clock because she needs to speak to tell him he's behaving inappropriately. It wouldn't be fair for her speaking (outside of rulings) to use his time. The clock then resumes once she's done speaking and Pattis continues with... whatever he's trying to do.
Nice to make your own closing argument 😅
reminded the jury about the rant and rave gibberish, this was half his closing. the rest was ...I.....I...I....I... and vague generalities and ancient references. Whose side is he on?
craziest case ever!
this is nothing against the Jodie Arias case
As jorDAN rightly pointed out during the Austin trial, there is no bottom. Just when you think it could not get any more despicably cringe, they find a way.
Knowledge Fight is the only way I have been able to keep my sanity through this trial.
@@fightshrub8872 can I recommend an adult spicy water in these trying times?
The defense has been stricken of any meaningful defense. They cannot say anything about the first amendment, for example.
@@jonathanribbing3055 The defense would have had that opportunity if it cooperated with discovery properly over however many years. The defense could have done things by the book, but the defense had to be dealt with like the petulant child it is when patience finally ran out.
@@philosaplease4867 You people keep saying that, but if it were true, then how did the Plaintiffs' lawyers present all the evidence that they did? The claim is that they didn't participate in discovery, yet the Plaintiffs have hours of video, depositions, documents, and emails that they entered as evidence to the court. I would disagree with, but could understand a liable verdict if the Defense had provided no evidence or insufficient evidence. Yet, the Plaintiffs were able to get more than just sufficient evidence to make their case, yet the judge declared that the Defense was liable still. If you look at other defamation cases, when evidence is requested during discovery, but not delivered, a default verdict isn't rendered, but rather the side requesting the information is allowed to presume that the evidence would have been damaging to their opponents and even inform the jury of this.
Compound that with the, continuous: "Objection" "Sustained", and it is clear this judge is not impartial. She is practically interrupting the Plaintiffs' lawyer to sustain his objections. On top of that, she told Pattis that he was not allowed to talk about what the Plaintiffs were going to argue in their closing statement, WTF? You can watch dozens if not hundreds of criminal and civil court cases and lawyers make these types of remarks all the time without the judge interrupting them on behalf of their opposition. Depp vs. Heard was a defamation case with damages, and both sides were able to talk about their oppositions closing remarks in the same manner that Pattis tried to here. This judge is clearly working for/with the Plaintiffs rather than be the impartial arbiter that her job demands.
For the record, I think Jones would be found liable of damages and that the families would be awarded several millions of dollars if this case were above board. My problem is that very little of this trial has been proper and/or operated like any other civil case. There are so many instances of this case being treated specifically to favor the Plaintiffs at the expense of the Defense. That sort of behavior jeopardizes the entire system, but the Plaintiffs and the judge both seem to think that they had a weak case and needed to do everything to make sure Jones lost. So much so, that they were willing to break or ignore the law, revoke fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Bill of Rights, and otherwise restrict the Defense to the benefit of the Plaintiffs. There were numerous instances of the judge making a ruling that prevented the Defense from bringing specific topics up or discussing them, only to have the Plaintiffs then address those same topics to the detriment of the Defense. And the judge just let them do it.
If this were in the NFL, that would be like the referee throwing a flag every time the Packers sacked the Steelers' quarterback, citing "unnecessary roughness", but then watching the Steelers tackle the Packers' quarterback and then kick him several times in the head without saying a word. Oh, and then every once in a while, the referee will run onto the field and kick the Packers' quarterback in the thigh, just for good measure. You would be over there saying the Packers deserved it because the referee said they failed to call which side of the coin for the coin toss before the game started.
43:58 for the beguinning of the "Stop the clock" moment for context.
And watch her let the plaintiffs talk about pattis lol
Hey, look at you!
You understand that putting context to a 'catchy clip' is a better way to convey a point trying to be made.
I think you have a good shot for a position at Law and Crime. Haha
But seriously, thanks for your comment.
@@zaphodisgod yeah yeah yeah, it’s always so unfair to the people you support, isn’t it. Maybe try stop playing the victim
@@zaphodisgod This is a damages case where the jury is only allowed to decide how much Jones and his company pays the Plaintiff... and it is improper to point that out? If the Plaintiffs' closing argument isn't about the cha-ching cha-ching, what have they been doing this entire time? And you are right, I haven't seen it yet, but I presume that the Plaintiffs's lawyer will argue that the defense only cares about getting the smallest monetary punishment allowed and the judge will say nothing.
For the record, I think that if this case were to be run 100% fair and impartial, Jones and his company would have been found liable and likely end up being responsible for several millions of dollars in damages. That's simply because of who the Plaintiffs are and where it is being held; he didn't have a chance. But, with how this entire trial has been rigged and so improperly run, I am just baffled that anyone thinks any of this will not get just demolished on appeal. I will be shocked and amazed if this judge and those lawyers are able to retain their jobs and licenses after this mockery of justice.
The Yang to the Brooks trail's Ying
OK. Invoking Orwell at 52:01 and saying Jones is a "creative, mad genius" lost me. I can picture the jury rolling their eyes.
I can agree with the mad part.
Picture me rolling my eyes when you claimed Attorney Pattis "lost you." (As if he ever had you in the first place).
@@Trendlaser_ As much as I dislike Jones, parts of Attorney Pattis’s argument has *some* merit. But no one except diehard fans is going to buy that Jones is a dyed in the wool prophet.
He glosses over a key difference, that Orwell wrote fiction while Jones presents himself as a journalist/pundit who discusses real-life news stories. I don't think he swayed anyone in that courtroom with that argument.
The real geniuses these days are Biden and Fauci, right?
Dave Mustaine made the defense closing statements!!!!
"What do you mean I don't support your system? I go to court when I have to."
@@EricJamesVideo "What do you mean I don't believe in God? I talk to Him everyday."
Words are dangerous to the American People....
Go back to Russia.
So the lawyer plays Alex Jones blathering on about Democrats, Russia, civil wars, Hillary and conspiracies. This first video is nothing more than another glass-gargling, political rant. I bet that reeeeally helped lol!
Your image for your account looks trustworthy......
The point of him playing the video was to show how Alex had stopped talking about Sandy Hook long before other news outlets had. In the trial they said that Alex was responsible because he kept it going and going about Sandy Hook being a hoax. When in reality he stopped while Megan Kelly and others continued talking about it.
@@jodi2462 His viewers STILL believe his BS from 2012, and he never publicly retracted it, never produced a correction, never cited his sources/"independent research"... until he got slapped with a lawsuit.
@@The_Cadaver Bingo!
@@The_Cadaver CNN does it all the time,...CNN said Kyle Rittenhouse is a Neo Nazi and Joe Biden put it in an ad running for president are they going to pay Kyle Rittenhouse for lies NOPE.
So he played 30 minutes of his client acting like a malicious lunatic, proceeded to insult plaintiff’s counsel, and through in a series of one liners that he probably uses in every trial. Wow.
At least it's better than his actual comedy act. He has two "jokes":
1) saying "I should get woke insurance!"
and
2) dropping his pants and saying the n word.
I am not making any of this up.
If that is all you got from this closing argument, you must have a severe learning disability.
That guy is obviously tired by life, talentless, not focused (his huge mistake by transfering personal datas of Alex Jones to his opponents just shows), and he lost this legendary trial according to the incredible amount of money won by the victims in a simple defamation trial : his carreer is over.
Insurance companies are not bankrupt. How ridiculous.
Just because he was at Woodstock in the 70's.
Fried brain? Or burnt moral compass?
@@davidohara7669 burnt moral compass. well said.
@@blairratner4759 RATNER! 🐀🤭
his lawyer opening is distancing himself from Jones?
Thats not what I heard.
@@hotpocket5501 "I'm here to defend FSS, not Alex Jones." No, I don't see the distancing there either.
@@elkeve2742 You making the rounds this morning or what, LoL? In this trial his job was not to prove Jones's innocence or guilt, that was already established by the judge and not a jury. Neither him or Jones were allowed to say Jones was innocent. His only job was to try and reduce the amount Jones will have to pay the parents. You might need to brush up a bit on what is going on here.
@@hotpocket5501 That's not a reply to what I wrote. He started by saying "I'm here to defend FSS, not Alex Jones". You're writing a whole lot of blah blah that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
@@elkeve2742 You know exactly what I meant. You're the one with your blah blah blah's. You must have better things to be obsessing over right now than Jones and FSS?
And this kids is how you lose a billion dollars in just under an hour
Fun Fact: under oath infowars corporate rep has said they are considered suing Robert Barnes for malpractice. Barnes has been a guest on Alex Jones show for the past month.
Please send over the source of this.
Barnes is making regular infowars appearances and wingmaning Alex during the trial as compensation for messing up the Lafferty discovery.
@@hotpocket5501 it was in one of the Brittany Poz depositions. I take it with a grain of salt, I doubt Jones will follow through on it.
@@VoteOmnivore I think about everything Brittany Poz said was taken with a grain of salt.
@@hotpocket5501 I almost feel bad for her, hope she got that 30,000 upfront
"tar baby"? 9:29, he says "I'm done with this tar baby"?
What's your point?
@@nargly8208 they’re looking for context as to what that means lol
@@nargly8208 foh whytie lolol
So glad that Megan Kelly is suing Alex Jones… whoa, wait.
What in the heck does any of this have to do with his trial. He is such a liar.
Wow…Quoting the Bible at the end… master manipulation.
Read the bible much?
@@jodi2462 yep… love this one “Ye shall know them by their fruit. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.” Nothing good has ever come from Alex Jones.
One good thing about being a conspiracy theorist and a Jones listener is that you don't get myocarditis.
Best comment today. If those lost souls that are trying to end Infowars had only listened to the renowned doctors and scientists Alex continues to interview on his network...
@@longdogmcbarky1457 The sad thing is that these people have no idea that he is on their side.
Your cult leader can't even say it.
Oh, wait, sorry. Yer cult leader can't eben shay it. RAAAAAAGH! DEMONS!!!
The best thing about nor being a total Nazi freak like you and Alex is everything. Including much better health.
The best part about being a freak like you is your stench tells everyone to throw rocks at your face.
Why is Alex talking that foolery?
I would like to point out that they settled on an amount of a billion dollars. A billion dollars. That's nearly enough to give $1 to every 1 in 7 people on the planet. It's that ridiculous.
Didn't buy enough Brain Force Plus.
Instahard!
Maybe you should give it a try.
@@hotpocket5501 Will it turn real people into simpering piles of goo like you?
This right here should make this case close
Probably not. I don't think there is much Pattis can do to help Jones. Essentially he's coming into the case having already lost. Pretty much all the plaintiff's attorneys had to do is put up the plaintiff's on the stand to talk about what they suffered and it's up to how much the jury feels they've been damaged. Impossible job for attorney Pattis even though I think he's the better lawyer.
The jury is corrupt too.
@@benpursell7682 does seem impossible, but impossible has happened before. He did an excellent job at trying to show that Alex had stopped talking about Sandy Hook long before other media outlets. I also think he did a great job showing how much the damages were being exaggerated.. lets see what happens!
@@jodi2462 exactly he also showed how the media are the ones who are really constantly bring up that pain and making them relive the day to try and get compensated
@@siddagoat563 The only probably with these arguments is that the families began being harassed as actors in a "hoax conspiracy" within days of the massacre, before they could even bury their dead children. That was all Alex Jones and his minions in the tinfoil hat parade. The damage had already been done way before his attorneys convinced him to do a mea culpa...
23:00 Bill Hicks looks good with lighter hair.
If they saw him in his full context it's even worse... So go ahead play the whole video
A hearing in damages is not about liability, but about awarding the Plaintiff monies to make the Plaintiff whole in the form of compensatory damages as decided by a jury and to punish the Defendant in the form of punitive damages pursuant to the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act as decided by a Judge. Attorney Pattis was wholly ineffective in his strategy, as evidenced by the result obtained.
A judge shouldn’t be allowed to be part of a case in which she was personally attacked by the defendant… you could tell she was biased against Jones….
Don't attack the judge in your trail over and over hoping to force them to back out.
And then be shocked when it doesn't work and doesn't help you.
He's got nothing except "...I.......I.....I....I...." and vague generalities. His video only reminded the jury of bad screaming gibberish .
What are you talking about? He made the point loud and clear -- just like his opening statement -- that the plaintiffs haven't proven any damages. So what is the jury supposed to award these people for damages? According to the plaintiffs: nothing.
@@MindlessTurtle What universe are you in? They have proved plenty damages. The amount is up to the jury.
@@MrBonners - any examples of the damages?
@@MindlessTurtle many moves, change jobs, change schools, change life, change .....
@@MindlessTurtle that is his opinion, the jury will decide if there are damages.
Ummm Did he just say he is a real journalist AND that Megan Kelly hit on him?
Yes, both were pretty much true.
@@hotpocket5501 interesting… do you think of him as one when AJ uses ‘i am not a journalist’ as his regular defence, including his now ended Texas trial?
@@mysticangel000 what do you consider a journalist? Do you consider Rachael madow, tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity or Chris Hayes as journalists? It is really the same thing except he does not have writers or use a teleprompter like those people do. I would disagree with you calling this interesting, it really isn’t and I have no idea or care what AJ has said about it in the past. Maybe sometimes he feels he is more of a talk show host. Being a journalist or not is really open to opinion. If you really are that interested as to what I think, I would say he is a talk show host/journalist. I don’t really think there is a law or rule against being both. I hope this satisfies your interest with this uninteresting topic.
@@mysticangel000 To me right now interesting issues are things like mrna now being found in ticketed mothers breast milk, 53,000 excess deaths in Europe each month and the potential Biden proxy nuclear war in Ukraine. Call me silly, but these issues seem just a bit more interesting, don't you think?
This guy went to 7 years of school?
Length of education is not equal to quality haha
oh so we can sue now if someone hurts your feelings with something they said. this wasn't a case of a media reporter purposely telling lies to intentionally cause harm...they got a liberal judge who wouldn't allow most of the defense's evidence in, found him guilty in default when he did show up, and put on a bunch of grieving parents to tell their stories of their loss. what could jones actually say or do that would even matter to those people years after the incident. if they could have charged jones with the shooting they would have. if this doesnt get tossed on appeal then a horrible precedence has been set and will come back to bite them.
This guy Pattis boasts on his website that he’s “labeled Americas fiercest trial lawyer” - continues to read a quote *verbatim* off of a sheet of paper so “that he doesn’t get it wrong”, then gets it wrong?
Doesn’t even remember his supposed “trial lawyers prayer”?
Yep, this is how low Alex has to go to secure a defense lawyer.
Can you describe your principle for what people can say about a tragedy? All i see on these channels are people complaining about lawyer performance. Yet when you ask people what they believe they go on tangents and avoid the question.
So a lawyer who asks the jury to follow the law is somehow the bottom of the barrel?? This man is almost 70...lets see how much you remember when you reach his age...at least he was wise enough to try and not get it wrong...but you criticize that??...yeah we should let you sit on a jury panel!
@@jodi2462nothing wrong with him asking the jury to follow the law. I never said that.
What I am saying is that he’s a bumbling, fumbling and stuttering lawyer who’s constantly violating courtroom procedure. Maybe it is indeed due to his age, so that’s the best lawyer AJ could have hired?
@@LegendLengthI won’t ignore the question or go off on a tangent.
This lawyer is constantly fumbling and bumbling and mis-speaking. He simply doesn’t appear persuasive when he has to constantly read off of his notes verbatim.
When he recites his “lawyers prayer” and gets all emotional he just sounds fake.
Pattis had a hard road to go and failed......I assume he was paid enough that he doesn't need to practice law anymore because who is going to hire him? He shouldnt have taken the case if he was concerned about his professional reputation
How exactly did he fail? Or yeah, he asked the jury to be fair and to follow the law. God forbid he ask that of them!!!
i guess its all in the eyes and ears of the beholder..You liked his presentation apparently and so I assume you would refer him to your friends and family and so maybe there are people that would hire him,. ok, to each his/her own. I wouldnt.
You don’t know what’s going on do you!
@@shiezo please tell me what you think is going on.
@@rickbenjamin6134 there was no way he “failed” he was just there to convince them to do what is “right” (have the payout to the family be a low amount of money) this case isn’t about winning or losing. So I don’t know how you think he failed
He is clearly throwing the case. I can't understand another reason why he did this much of a horrible job.
Uhhh is this video in the beginning of the video supposed to make Alex look less guilty?? 😂🤦
Did he used to be a public defender? I feel like I’ve seen him multiple times in CT court rooms
Civil rights attorney
He was Fotis Dulos attorney
Fotis dulos his big case. Made a fool out of himself when he wanted to defend a dead man to keep his $1 million retainer
@@pauldalnoky6055 your very wrong. Attorney Pattis has an excellent reputation in the Connecticut Court system. And he wasnt interested in Dulos's money. You sound like the fool. Disliking who he represents in one thing but talking about things and bashing him without knowing him is another. He happens to be a very caring person. And if you bothered to even look up his history you would know that.
He's a lowlife. Wanted to cheat dulos' kids out of their inheritance
No he didn't end with the Lord's prayer.... He should be ashamed of himself 🐱
Repugnantains have no shame, His client has no shame.
the most important thing, lunch hour
Wolfgang wasn't there
I gotta say a better lawyer making the same defense could have gotten a better ruling…he just wasn’t that good at presenting
He tried
To those of you commenting that Jones did nothing wrong, that he had a first amendment right to say what he said, that he spoke the truth,etc., I have some questions::
Why did he run scared away from the case?
Why did he not have the guts to even try to defend his actions?
What was he afraid of??
He is a coward. He was afraid to defend himself because he knew he was wrong. He played games to delay his day of reckoning.
And he lost. He has already been held liable for defamation. That ship has sailed. He took the cowards way out.
Now it is time to make him pay for his vile actions.
First off, he didnt run scared. The plaintiffs attorney had their chance to ask him anything they wanted when he was called to the stand. If they didnt thats on them.
Secondly, he didnt have to defend anything. He didnt shoot those children Adam Lanza did. He never said that no children died.
Thirdly, he has apologized multiple times to the parents for calling them actors and saying Sandy Hook was a hoax.
Lastly, cowards way out? nothing he could have ever said would have been enough. And he hasnt lost anything yet. The jury is still out on that one. Wouldnt everyone be surprised if they didnt find any money damages? Think people are mad now...wow..we shall see!
😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
Amen
Don't get so emotionally involved.
Xwise---never said being a coward is illegal. But it does speak to a man's character. Jones could have complied with discovery requests. He could have avoided the default judgment. He chose not to because he knew his statements were indefensible.
His lawyer looks a total mess.
Leave the guy alone. Wtf is going on. Omg. Freedom of speech. Leave him alone
Jones did not flee. This is nothing like a fair trial. He was not allowed to respond honestly under oath; if he didn't answer the way their scripted narrative said for the "show," the judge repeatedly threatened to throw him in jail for contempt.
Note: The precedent for past defamation suits where the Plaintiff was ACTUALLY defamed (& their NAME must be said; Jones never named individuals, he simply allowed questioning what looked like inconsistencies in the tragic event) is an average of $50 THOUSAND. This mockery of our justice system is asking over $500 MILLION PER plaintiff 😳 (including an FBI agent who never watched a minute of Alex Jones who never heard of this agent or others)! Read my ABOUT❗️👈🏻
Jury: Your honor, we want to award money to the families.
Judge: How much money?
Jury: All of it.
Jones would be getting off light even if the jury forcibly installed a colostomy bag via firearm inside the courtroom.
@@The_Cadaver agreed. If I were one of those parents I don't think Alex would've lived this long. After your child is dead, what more do you have to lose?
@@NG-cf7zh Alex Jones is the definition of "not worth it" man. If anything, he would relish in the attention and parlay it into another signal boost.
He kicked people that didn't have any fight left in them. It was a semi-calculated move. Knowing he could hide behind his following and a mountain of grief.
I really hope he is sued into the working man's income bracket.
@@The_Cadaver wise words, I'd get a kick out of seeing him stocking shelves at a grocery store or doing some other regular gig😁
@@The_Cadaver Did you watch any of his videos where he supposedly attacked them, i think not.
Talk about losing lawyers!
If jones was a ship he would be the Titanic
They don't have much to work with.
Why is he allowed to AGAIN blast his BS?
It's called a closing argument in a trial.
@@hotpocket5501 ~ Oh, okay. I thought this trial was about how much Jones is going to have to pay to the victims' families. I suppose I am somehow challenged, because I cannot imagine how blasting the Hillary conspiracies has any bearing in that matter ~ my bad?
@@terriwinkle9366 So you're viewing this trial through a liberal ideology and are hurt by his Hillary comments? I hope you are never placed on a jury of any great importance. If you could not see the points that Pattis was making, then you could be challenged or just blinded by your ideologies.
@@terriwinkle9366 And exactly what Hillary conspiracy theories are you referring to?
Listening to Professor Ponytail just makes me want to award the families more and more and more money.
I assume you're related to them in some way?
@@pewdiepiechallenger4151 Ah, so you listen to poopy pie. Why did you decide to be a Nazi?
Same he’s almost as vile as Alex
@@melodieshimon Almost as vile as Joe and Hunter B.?
@@hotpocket5501 LMAO take your meds, loser
Like jack Webb, used to say: "Just the facts mam". That was an era before "alternative facts". Alex is so calm and talks normal, lol. That's the crap he has to use to defend his crook of a client.
A billion dollars lol? That's just ridiculous. I'm sorry but that amount absolutely made this into a clown show. Was he wrong? Yes absolutely. But that amount made it like a kangaroo court. Hey this person hurt my feelings and said something untrue about me,, give me a billion dollars. You insulted me, give me 500 million. It's absurdity. And I'm no Alex fan, just saying where does this end? Look at me wrong and I'll see you in court. This will go into appeal for probably the rest of his life.
It was a kangaroo court!
attorney Pattis did awesome despite the kangaroo judge and her court
How does it feel to champion the man who bullied, lied about, and profited on the families of murdered children. Sleep tight humanitarian.
I like this lawyer so much.
I do too, but kinda perplexed about his hair. I am cool w long pony tails on older men but why did he make it a double pony?
@@MK-ih6wp Maybe he wanted to be like Jasmine in Aladdin. 🤣🤣🤣
@@luizabakumenko I think he is 1 ponytail short from a Jasmine Pony! 🤣🤣
@@MK-ih6wp Decided to add his own twist to it. 🤣🤣🤣
@@luizabakumenko You've inspired me. I'm totally wearing a jasmine pony tomorrow-- although I am not blessed with as much hair as this lawyer. Wish I had his volume!
Norm, Norm, Norm...smh...His reputation here in New Haven is laughable...His act is getting stale.
I'll take hurt feelings for $550M Alex. Please forgive my lack of virtue signaling.
Wow, that Spiel at 52:01 had me rolling my eyes for sure. He sounded like he was auditioning for a part in a bad play. 😂
Jones never said to target families or to harass them. The only plaintiffs names he said had already become public figures. Alex did make a mistake in his analysis and speaking off the cuff. The fact Alex made a huge mistake doesn't mean that his years of exposing corruption and evil are irrelevant. Go watch his documentaries to see the best of Alex after watching so much of the worst of him. May the families of the slain children find peace. May Alex learn from this failure and continue his work in exposing the highest levels of corruption in governments and corporations.
The problem is is that your are trying to reason with triple boosted sh*t l*bs.
The problem is is that your are trying to reason with the triple boosted.
Yeah, he did. So you're a liar and so is he.
@@psycher7 Do you know the names of one of his listeners that harassed the families, and when their court dates are?
@@psycher7 please provide a link of video evidence with a timestamp
i zoned out after about 10 seconds 👊🥴
Alex Jones Spoke on Sandy Hook for about 24 mins when it first happened. He's not responsible for any of this. He has a Right to speak on news issues of the day just as anyone else has. The 1st amendment should protect all speech including and especially speech we don't like. This court has prevented free speech, when a Judge tells you point blank you may only answer Yes, No or I don't know, you are not sitting in an American court. This notion of restricting a persons speech in court or his ability to say "I'm innocent" has never been the case in any courtroom in all American history and it is un-American, regardless of what you think of Alex Jones.
Imagine your favorite podcaster or news reader sitting in a court room being told they can't speak freely or answer as they wish to? Ask yourself, is that what you would want at your own trial because this sets a Precedent in American law that is very scary for any citizen, something that has never happened and may change the way court cases work from now on. This is not about Sandy Hook or Alex Jones, it is about setting precedence to go after who ever they want to shut up!
Lastly, there is a Huge difference between the Pain caused by Adam Lansa shooting and killing these children and the pain caused by talking heads dredging it up or Alex Jones questioning the shooting after having School Safety Experts question it. Adam Lansa Caused the pain these parents feel but their lawyers made them aware of Alex Jones questioning the shooting in 2008 in order to bring him down in Lawfare. The parents were recovering by 2008 and trying to live their lives best as possible when these attack dog lawyers dredged up the past and refocused them to go after someone hardly anyone even listens to. America has 320 million people, only 8 million have even heard of Alex Jones and only 1-2million are regular listeners. Imagine if you questioned 9/11 or Israel attacking children in Palestine for throwing rocks or some other issue close to your heart on your youtube channel and then getting dragged into this kind of a court. Well that is now a possibility.
If you want to see Alex Jones Full media interview outside the courtroom go to bannedDOTvideo to watch it. No other media carried it, his other Lawyer Robert Barnes explains the implications of this type of trial.
@@rolliebrown9802 Agreed, look, in every event that happens during your lifetime there will be comments made for and against, there will be questions and that is what makes for a healthy free society. Once Speech or the ability to question government becomes a liability, the common man will suppress their own speech and online thoughts which is exactly what certain tyrants would love.
Nope, all of that is false and you are a liar.
So glad these comments are representative of true and actual public opinion and not something curated just to tell ppl how they are supposed to think. This fair and reasonable judge has no bias and the ranting and raving of Alex Jones should be illegal, right? RIGHT?
Back in the olden days folks would socially shun snake-oil salesmen and run them out of town... I reckon' free speech is free speech, but ppl shouldn't be surprised if juries do what they can to publicly ostracize Jones & "run him off" social media, aka try to teach everyone that there's a price for lies. 🤷🏻♀️ Legal speech that is 1) untruthful 2) profitable & 3) harmful... imo it should be penalized. He's being irresponsible & his audience is too large for us to turn a blind eye to what he's done to them.
Free speech should never be illegal
You apparently live in total delusion. This judge is a biased, tyrannical joke.
Can't wait for the day you come before such a judge and wonder why your rights are being trampled on when you don't get a defense. That day will be glorious.
This isn’t about free speech, this is about lying. Freedom of speech doesn’t give you permission to lie for profit.
@@christophergalligan9160 so naive
He needs a color/ fashion consult cause that look is a 3rd degree felony
this lawyer is so condescending. I know he is trying to save Jones millions of dollars, but he speaks to people like children. If I am a Christian sitting on that jury I would be totally offended by his Lords Prayer diatribe.
Or the other way of looking at it is, our laws are sometimes difficult to understand...you would be surprised how many people have a hard time understanding beyond a reasonable doubt, I believe he was just trying to stress that even though the plantiffs attorneys are trying to get a judgement based on anger and sadness our laws say you need to take that out of the equation.
@@jodi2462 by reciting an abominable version of the Lords Prayer? by talking down to the Jury like they are all a bunch of yokels? and anger is part of this lawsuit. The relatives are angry that Jones has
said either the parents are actors or the children did not die. Sadness has never been a part,
@@DoncasterLass Hes not the only one who has ever used parts of the bible or the lords prayer in a different form for what its meant to be. I dont believe he meant any harm or disrespect. Your entitled to your opinion, but I just didnt see it as him talking down to them. I understand that the parents and so many others are angry, just like Attorney Pattis said...they have a right to be angry. You wouldnt have a heart if this wasnt upsetting. What he was trying to get across is that unfortunately emotion is not suppose to be used for jury verdicts. You have to remove that, which is a very hard thing to do, but is required when you promise to be just and fair as a juror. All he did was try to get across to the jurors that their verdict needs to be based on the law...no more, no less. And afterall, when the jurors agreed to be on the panel isnt that their duty? Jones has apologized multiple times for his actions. Christians forgive and leave judgement up to their God..Jones also deserves to be forgiven for his mistakes as well.
I haven’t watched it yet but it can’t POSSIBLY be worse than his opening statement. Ready to sit back and watch the failure unfold popcorn 😎🍿
He's the worst!
I can’t wait to see the verdict. Hoping it’s a billion dollars. “I can’t say much more than I’ve said for Mr. Jones”. Nope. You sure can’t.
Well aren't you nasty and uninformed.
The ambulance chaser crying about being called an "ambulance chaser" priceless!
Amen
Hey for real the liberal media doesn’t want you to know this, but eating glass is super good for you. Go try it.
@@christophergalligan9160 - lol, keep jabbing yourself with boosters, lmao
What on earth makes him thing that the clips of this raving lunatic help his case??
His closing argument is a boring rant? It is my opinion that this lawyer has nothing to say. Yawn.
Maybe try again and listen a bit more closely?
@@hotpocket5501 I listened all the way through. He knows his client is guilty, and so do I. I listened to the now "deleted" broadcasts. I used to be a fan- until her turned on those innocent families. It was not simple an exploration of issues. It was hate filled rants. He urged his follwers to harrass those families until they admitted that it was all a fraud. Not once did I ever hear him call off his hounds. It took court actions to make him back off.
Not that it matters in this court, but between his ranting, and those court actions, his wife was devastated. He destroyed his family. Even today he is Mr. Right, and everyone else is a liar. .
I don't care if he can plead innocent of future debasements, what I care about is those first few days.
@@WgB5 You must be a bit confused about this trial William. It was not about him or his lawyers proving his innocence, that was already determined by the default judgement. Neither him or his attorney were allowed to claim his innocence. His attorneys job was to lessen the amount to be paid to the families. And no, you never listened to him during the time this was taking place because if you did you would know that he never told his listeners to harass the families. If you know of listeners of his that did harassing, please reply back with at least one name and their upcoming court dates.
@@WgB5 You seem overly compassionate about something that took place 10 years ago. Were you equally as passionate when CNN lied about and defamed Rittenhouse for months on end or when James Hodgkinson shot up a republican softball practice and almost killed Steve Scalise? My guess is that neither of those situations bothered you one bit because they fit your political ideology. You can easily prove me wrong by pointing me to the direction of your social media posts about those events.
@@WgB5 And by the way, if it were up to Jones and his listeners there would be armed guards at every school and these things would never happen in the first place. It is the left that care more about armed guards watching over their money in banks than having them at the schools and keeping kids safe.
Personally I would of liked jones to testify again and Mr pattis too question some of the parents instead of have no qs for them but I understand why he didn't for both those .
Yeah. Megan Kelly thinks Alex Jones is just Dreamy. She swoons at the very mention of his name. He’s her dream boat. 😂😂😂😂😂 He Starts Out with a lie and Continues to Build on it, then calls Her a monster???? 😂😂😂😂😂
You obviously did not watch the video's that he taped of their conversations, did you? You might want to start there.
Pattis is a joke. He is no better then Alex himself.
I can't believe that they thought playing this video was going to put a positive spin on anything or do their case any good at all.
His very first statement makes him sound very self-absorbed! And his statement that he started reading sounds like he's admitting that Alex Jones knew the incredible division fear and hate that he was using to make money
Oh really????? There’s evidence out there to SUPPORT Jones’ statements. Just very unfair that it WASN’T ALL0WED as evidence. NOT ALLOWED DOESN’T MEAN IT DOESN’T EXIST!
YEA YOUR RIGHT . ONLY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS ALLOWED TO DO THAT 😡 ALEX SO BAD
No mainstream's not allowed to do that either, that's why the big lie that Fox News told about the voting machines is causing them so many court cases and lawsuits
The Hunter B. trials will be much more interesting.
Say, how's cyclops Stewie doing? You know, the traitor who announced the formation of his traitor club on Alex's show? He's going to spend every last one of his remaining days in prison.
@@psycher7 You're really making the rounds tonight, aren't you? LoL.
@@hotpocket5501 How much is AJ paying you? It can't be much for this Z-tier shitposting, but I want to know.
@@psycher7 $10,000 per comment
@@psycher7 The Hunter Biden trial, if it ever happens, would be much more interesting. Whether I agree with Alex or not, the outcome of this trial was pretty obvious which makes it pretty boring. I don't know how a court would respond or treat the son of a President (or ex-President depending on the time). But, all this is *if* it comes to pass.
Attorney Pattis - one of the worst lawyers ever. You should check out his website all his pictures are from like 12 years ago when he looked less like absolute hot-faeces. That was a personal attack Judge, sorry.
Yall cant see what's going on?
Sadly these people in here can't and have no clue that he is on their side.
We see justice being done. This angers you because you're evil.
@@psycher7 LoL, you can't see evil when it is right in front of your face. Maybe you have not heard about Hunters lap top??
@@psycher7 We are on your side and pray for you every day.
@@psycher7 to believe there is evil, you must also believe in God, so that’s one good thing you have going for yourself.
i rate alex jones as a journalist.
I like that he confirms that his client is despised. He should have added that he is so hated that he threatens democracy.
Nah, he is more popular and liked now than ever.
Wow dude.. you in an echo chamber. This guy has a huge following and for no small feat. He’s been forecasting the future for dozens of years. And he’s gotten 90% of what he’s said right.
Amen
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 You live under a rock?
@@tristanphillips7275 Drink the cool aid, boy.
18:00 After Jimmy Dore spit water in Alex Jones face (on camera!), I am surprised Alex Jones is standing up for Jimmy Dore now. Alex must be a forgiving person...
It's almost as if people's rights matter more than personal disputes...
You Apologized in court already. I think your 15 minutes of fame are up
This lawyer is destroying his own client. I can’t believe he’s bashing the victims. This proves Jones will just go back to what he was doing before, without any empathy for victims.
It is ok for the plaintiffs to "bash" the defendant non stop, but you have an issue with the defense fighting back? Have you ever watched a trial before?
Um and where exactly was he bashing the victims? I think you watched the wrong trial.
@@rolliebrown6498 Most people have no idea about government programs like Operation Northwoods and have no clue that our government is not above doing such things. It's like an adult still believing in Santa Klaus.
@@rolliebrown6498 Most people have no idea about government programs like Operation Northwoods and have no clue that our government is not above doing such things.
@@rolliebrown6498 Most people have no idea about government programs like Operation Northwoods.
His lawyer made sure to play Jones recorded message to the jury cause he didn't trust him to do it correctly.... Snickers.
That clip was from around 2016-2018
That statement really shows your bias...to make such a miscalculation because you're so primed to condemn Jones. Perhaps you've been brainwashed?
@@MaximusXXX77 this is just about dates, Jones already lost lol
@@elv1980 Then what is the purpose of the jury? This is a civil case. It's about money, honey.
@@robertw6348 Yes, and it's CLEAR Jones has directed Pattis to show this, because NO smart defense attorny would play a claim demonstrating very, very clearly exactly why Jones is there in a closing.
That lawyer should be disgusted, not proud!!!!
I don't know. I spent years disgusted by what Alex Jones did and is still really currently doing. But after hearing this closing argument, I feel differently. I read the Washington Post and did receive my news from CNN, but after seeing Alex Jones' segment here in the closing argument, I have to ask, this is why he's being sued? Jones brings up some excellent points and asks great questions. This civil suit needs to be dropped.
@@beckydoesit9331 Troll. You also describe yourself as a Darrell Brooks fan in another comment. 🤣🤣🤣
disgusted in himself for providing honest legal defense for his client? why?
@@beckydoesit9331 well perhaps because he's defamed and slandered the parents of murdered children. Lying and wind up his followers to sell pills is all he's about
@@beckydoesit9331 Also, who says “I read the Washington Post and I watch CNN”? Even liberals don’t lead off with their favorite news sources in a comment like this.
Jimmy dore spat on Alex jones
Did the plaintiff's lawyer sustain his own objection at 38:08?
yep
Idiotic! Typical of team Silence Those You Disagree With.”
@@JohnAdams-mu7xd What farce all of this is.
@@darkwingscooter9637 true
He didn't say "sustained" he said "the same", which means "the same reason I objected before", you'll here it often in courtrooms. Norm than chose to just drop and it move on without a ruling, which is pretty common when you know it'll be sustained (since the last one did and he knows he's not allowed to say that).
Man if I had to get rich quick, I would just target his audience. If you just yell loud enough they start following you for some reason 😂
The reason is that he doesn’t censor news like your daddy the gov does fool
scream about the deep state and hunter biden's laptop, and the liberals, and the MAGA's just "click...whirrr" take my money!
One good thing about being a conspiracy theorist and a Jones listener is that you don't get myocarditis.
@@hotpocket5501 It's an incredibly potent cure for having friends and family. The FDA, FBI, CIA, the Pentagon (somehow not the same as the CIA), MyPillow, and the PTA have all come saying that this stuff works. Of course it works! It kills all relations.
_P A T E N T E D N A N O S I L V E R_
Yeah, they really should have finished Junior High School.
So, a defendant can testify and propagandize under the guise of “closing arguments” as long as his lawyer is the one pushing the “play” button. The law continues being played by narcissists and sociopaths.
Yep. Just not the ones that you are thinking of.
Have no trouble that a morally corrupt person quotes from a morally corrupt book of fiction.
The defendant can make whatever argument they want. So can the plaintiff. Equal treatment. It's not that complicated.
Two attorneys for the plaintiffs.
What did that video have to do with anything what a ridiculous defence sounded more like a preaching
You must not have listened very well.
This argument would have me awarding everything possible to those parents. Enough to force that greedy fear monger to pay attention to reality for once. This lawyer has lost his mind.
I stand with Alex jones
@@totallyrandom4816 Get your checkbook ready then lol
What about the media who lost this stuff and make them relive this trauma?
@@totallyrandom4816 Are you living in reality?
@@siddagoat563 The same media that published what the plaintiffs' attorneys found in his text messages accidentally sent to the plaintiffs' attorneys? That media?
I was gutted when I heard heard that Alex lost :\
Agreed
Let's go Alex!