Judge Confronts Owen Shroyer About Hosting on InfoWars with Alex Jones
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июл 2022
- WATCH: The judge in the Alex Jones defamation trial confronted InfoWars host Owen Shroyer about being on air with Jones Tuesday and discussing the case.
#AlexJones #OwenShroyer #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
I've never seen a judge act this way towards someone testifying
EXACTLY! CORRUPT!
She’s extremely unprofessional.
This Soros Power Mad Leftist Judge has one goal and it ain't Justice.
Because it's a rigged trial that was brought in a district that had a judge who hates anything that's right of Joseph Stalin.
@@beauregaurde9445 and your trailer must be leaking
My wife is a retired judge and I can tell you a ton of shady stories about judges and lawyers.
,,😂😂😂
You mean that this system is corrupted?
@@Jenia00000 it’s like anything else. There are good ones and bad ones. If they were all bad it would be a complete hellscape and it’s not.
@@eprofessioprobably
Dragging a man through the mud, then blocking him from saying he's been dragged through the mud.
Thats the so called justice system for u. They think they are God's among Men simply because they wear a robe.
Wrong! How’s that Trump University law degree going there Perry Mason? 😂😂
I have never ever in my life seen a judge act as a lawyer during a proceeding. What is this lady doing???? What is going on here?????
She is trying to determine whether the rules of the court were violated. You can be pretty sure that jury was not present in the courtroom when this was taking place.
It’s violation of American rights and constitute
Zionism
Watching a lot of Judge Judy doesn’t make you a law expert.
@psilocosmo When did you learn that lesson ??
Imagine having been a federal prosecutor and then claiming you didn’t understand how the rule works. Just actively trying for a mistrial.
Imagine there being A “rule” for something that is televised. The only purpose for the rule is so that the defendant and his witness can’t talk about what a rigged trial this is to their listeners.
Ya like even when u r prosecutor u cant just slander ppl they r outta their minds u have to phrase it right these prosecutors or off the wall
The problem is, today, 99% of cases settle out of court and do not go to trial. This guy probably legitimately doesn’t understand as he probably almost never takes cases to trial
I think that working towards a mistrial is jones' legal teams end goal, they know that they can't win so why not try to sabotoge the precedings.
Seems to me like the lawyer was just trying to cover the client. I bet he's well aware of the rule and told Shroyer about it but Shroyer didn't follow it so he had to take the blame by pretending to be ignorant. If he didn't do that then Shroyer can be held in contempt for knowing the rule and breaking it anyway
"Enough with the 'Aw shucks!''" Haha, I'm stealing that one.
Me too
judge is a biased c*nt ain't that funny
@Aaa Aaa224 He's rather a real a$$hole!!!
@Aaa Aaa224 is that sarcasm? 🙄😬
Is it normal for a judge to directly question a witness like this?
In a situation like this, where she is trying to figure out on whom the blame lays for not respecting the rule, yes. Very normal.
This is what lawyers like to call getting bench slapped.
Lol
And this judge is nobody to fool around with...
and a well deserved one at that.
@@Colgate64 she talks like nobody has fooled around with her in a very long time
@@MrSisterFister42069 what do you mean by that ?
This lawyer is done - first he send his clients entire phone records to his opposition and then he doesn’t tell his clients the rule and they do a freakin podcast while the case is going on - worst attorney ever
What's funny, is that he was suppose to turn those phone texts over in the discovery and didn't, which should make him done for... but instead he accidentally sent them which ALSO means he should be disbarred and done for. Worst attorney ever is correct.
I know this is ironic, considering the defendant is a conspiracy theorist himself, but part of me thinks his attorney knows that AJ is a garbage human who deserves the worst, and while he has to put on a convincing show that he is defending him, actually leaked that material intentionally.
Before this trial i hired this attorney to defend me in a jaywalking ticket.🤦♂️
@@robertcuratolo5339 Did you get life?
Mmmh I beg to differ POWELL, GUILIANI , EASTMAN , CRUZ, COMEY BARRETT, CLARK, SESSIONS, BARR ARE PRETTY DISGUSTING, CORRUPT , INCOMPETENT AND VILE AS JONES’ counsel.
It is a sad day in America when they want to silence people they disagree with
It is. This wasn’t one of those days
@@dane21dcexcept it was
@dm2047 no it wasnt
They discriminate under the guise of law, sometimes even being unlawful.
They will face karma eventually.
@@intermilan9731wow thanks for the intelligent and carefully thought dribble…😂😂
It seems like they kept doing this as desperate attempts to simply stop anyone from either testifying or to just get the case thrown out entirely.
It’s a kangaroo court
Seriously! As a non-lawyer and never having been involved in any legal proceedings, even I know that you aren't supposed to discuss a case outside of a few specific parameters.
True, BUT we're at a point where the case is being posted on youtube.. no one has to talk, can just go watch there. Also maybe they did or didn't talk about the case, I didn't see the episode, but maybe all they talked about was her taking away Alex's right to defend himself. Honestly, most of the case is public. They probably didn't give intimate details because there are none to give... it's all known.
This trial is a sham and the judge belongs behind bars. Listen to Barnes describe this travesty of justice.
@@amilan409 I really do not get why it is so hard to understand that NONE of the witnesses is ALLOWED to watch the stream.
NO WITNESS is ALLOWED to talk about what actually happens at trial because that would highten the risk that ANOTHER witness could be influenced by it.
If you are saying: "Whatevs, they can do it anyway."
Yes, they could. And if found out, that would have consequences.
If Shroyer would have said what you suggest (Alex' right to defend himself being taken away) he also would have been LYING - once more.
The thing is, literally nobody cares about the courts rules they follow unless they work for the courts themselves.
I can tell you aren't a lawyer...
This judge is doing the prosecuting and judging 😂
This is all an act.
And the judge is a man.
She's an Activist. They all are. And this is a kangaroo court.
@@mattyo2291 Hahaha kangaroo court did u come up with that or am I living under a rock? 💪🏻
This judge had a hard time hiding her bias. From the beginning she was clearly bias.
*BIASED. How do you even know the term bias, but not how to use it in past tense?
@@notreally2406the judge sounded like an angry lgbt feminist. Cope
It’s called free speech, a protected human right
Wow. This defense lawyer is a disaster.
Nope...I think they just don't like him. And wanted him to loose his money/mind.
they’re sketchy
@@tonimillersmith1009 So breaking the rules is fine as long as you like them... Dullard.
Alex jones and his goons are the disaster.
jim
they are flouting the rules in a way which indicates the contempt they have for the american legal system. jones is like all narcissists, the rules don`t apply to him.
Enough of the "aww shucks, i dont know the rules of this court" 😂😎 yes judge, Yes
"oh, cuz you're just a brand new lawyer right?" 🤣
Charade of s*** the judge is illegitimate not following the Constitution or the rule of law this whole court is rigged and the lawyers trying hard to get some free money but this comes all the way from the criminals in charge and whatever happened to a person's freedom of speech
I loved it when she said that.
@@paulalane2176 people today get so much enjoyment watching people they hate be destroyed an then are also confused why our world is falling apart the way it is, People fell in love with hate.
@@TreeGod. settle down. As If alex jones didnt deserve this, and IF we cant enjoy seeing him get cut down to size, it really is a dull world. Not all of us are hateful like mr jones
Lol so the case is being aired on the internet but he can’t generally discuss it at all lmao
What a disgrace, this woman is evil and is the last person on earth who should ever be able to practice law.
You sound like Donald Trump
Infowars dumped shroyer. 🤣
The lawyer should be sanctioned by the BAR
dont worry....all of jones' attys are going to lose their licenses to practice after this debacle
Not even sure they even passed the BAR exam lol
@@thewkovacs316 you're a watchmen fan who clearly missed it's point
why u upper case bar lmfao just say bar u weeb
The judge should have bsnged the hammer doen and given him 10 days in JAIL, right then and there.
Don’t care if he just passed the bar yesterday or 100 years ago! That is a long standing rule of all court’s! The lawyer should have been held in Contempt and majorly fined!!!!!
yes, it’s like claiming ignorance of the law….jones is toast..unless a reptilian ufo crashes into the courthouse…
I bet the lawyer told them. They are just douchebags who don’t have a conscious so they lie and make their lawyer look bad rather than being honest and taking their punishment
Had he watched the Amber vs Johnny Depp case he would have known. Lol
wonder what his losing streak is.
Lmao...it not like that in all cases. Hints public trials and televised trials. It has to be ordered.
The more I watch this trial, the more I’m convinced that Jones’ attorney got his law degree from a Cracker Jack box…
Think of it as “The bottom of the barrel” as Jones’ legal team changed many times.
@@MarioLabot from my understanding a lot of attorneys that Mr Jones wanted was not accepted by the kangaroo court
@@john-thomasmanion.benefici4688 So it’s a kangaroo court when Jones lost by default judgement in two states?
@@john-thomasmanion.benefici4688 What evidence do you have for this? Honestly, I would like to know.
OTOH, you can't claim that it was a "Kangaroo Court" because all the proceedings were televised. You may disagree with the way that the proceedings were carried out, but that is because you are not a lawyer and most people think that they know about court proceedings because they've seen an episode or two of "Law & Order" or some other such tripe.
I'd also point out that the US justice system is so very strange because US law makers, especially those on the extreme right, have made it that way, after all, the SCOTUS has had a Republican majority since 1972 or so.
But I'm always ready to listen to someone trying to claim injustice in court cases, it usually involves a lot of mirth for me.
But please, go ahead.
They are from the same firm they got the amber heard lawyers from lol
Since when did judges do the job of the DA?
Why is a judge cross examining a witness? Never seen that before.
She wasn’t cross examining him. She was asking questions related to his contempt of her court. That happens all the time.
Sjw judge
That's not a cross examination... She's trying to find out where the blame lays for their refusal to follow the rule. Baby's first trial?
@@MrGabou77 Yes. I'm not a lawyer and have never had a trial except for a traffic ticket.
These lawyers are playing and hoping for a mistrial. They can't win any other way.
There is no winning - he’s already been found guilty by default
They have already been found liable for defamation.
I don’t think this judge is going to allow a mistrial. Feel like she might peep what they’re trying to do and she isn’t falling for it
@@asymmattrical wtf is guilty by default?
This is a target rich environment for appeal, whatever the outcome. Complete nonsense and none of it will stick, it's only intention is to silence current and future whistleblowers and journalists
Broadcasting lies should be a criminal offence.
Yeah, so every major liberal newscast should be charged since they've been doing it like forever.
tell that to CNN
IMAGINE getting scolded by the devil
Woah. I thought the same
Judge, I forgot to tell my client the rules of the court because I was rearranging my sock _drawer,_ tomorrow being Arbor Day and all.
🤣😂
☠☠☠
Ayyyy coñooooo! I MISSED ARBOR DAY?!?!
drawer*
@@itscalledlogic7 Thanks
I wonder if he's being intentionally inept so they can declare a mistrial to delay the inevitable.
YES...
Could be the plan, but Alex Jones is capable of hiring experienced attorneys, so that won’t fly with any judge!
You're wondering....really?
The prosecution brought this up to the judge because there are at least 4 things that they have done that are cause for a mistrial.
defense cannot cause a mistrial to benefit their client
This Judge is a nasty woman. She’s sarcastic, rude and talks down to others.
One of the worst I’ve ever seen
The way she first spoke geez
Completely based and dripping with animosity !
guy to his barber: "give me that 'chin way bigger than it is' look"
barber: "say no more fam"
She's going to hold Jones'attorney in contempt
Hope she presses for Jones perjury too.
Kangaroo show trial. Why should they not talk about the trail. What is this court hiding.
@@zackthebongripper7274 That’s pretty SOP for any trial 🙄.
@@zackthebongripper7274 Say you don't know how courts and trials work without saying you don't know how courts and trials work.
@@zackthebongripper7274 How dare the court follow up on basic rules of the trial. This is simple contempt.
It's crazy how tongue-tied these loudmouths become when being forced to actually be held accountable for their actions.
Accountable for what? QUESTIONING AUTHORITY? You People are so Ignorant about Anything, Honestly!
It's called free speech hun, not speech you like. Totalitarian much?
I think its absolutely disgusting that this remark got 22 likes when it's being held accountable for their words,This case Will BE won by These Crazy People & it will be USED TO SILENCE A NATION, YOU IGNORANT FOOLS! SAD!
What has infowars done that mainstream media hasnt ? Mainstream media has been caught lying about using green screens and do we remember how cnn got sued into the ground over defaming the Covington kid.
It's going to be crazy how tongue-tied you will be when judgement time comes for your treason
Not supposed to discuss anything happening in the courtroom during the trial yet the courts are allowing the trial to be aired on places such as yt as the trial is going on. That's hypocritical AF right there above all.
The difference is the court is airing the case for the public to view. Alex Jones and his team are openly discussing the case and attempting to draw doubt on the proceedings on their tv show as a means to litigate the issue outside of the supervision of the court. It’s two completely different things.
That’s only hypocritical if you were unaware that trials get aired, from the OJ trial to the Amber Heard trial. Everyone in these trials can’t speak on them until they’re done. It’s just basic civics 🤷
@mranderson718 how is that any different than what cable news does?
@@mranderson718 Litigation is a courtroom process.
And FYI, "dis/misinformation" is false, (but preferred by establishment), information, or else you would use the words "false information".
What we are seeing today is a court system that has problems holding up to public scrutiny. There is no such thing as the right to fully understand the charges against you anymore, so court "recorded/shown" means very little with out explanation to the public. Do we get justice or tyranny from that?
@@mranderson718 So what, freedom of speech.
This guy is so smug and confident when sitting behind his "news desk" disseminating misinformation but looks confused and lost when in an area where lies are not tolerated.
He's in a kangaroo court where they are not treated fairly. And it's happening in everybody's face.
@@vladchiriac2101 The lawyer representing Jones requested the court instigate the rule, Jones broke that rule & the judge showed leniency by not immediately finding the 2 in contempt of court, which comes with an automatic detention sentence. She gave them a really clear "don't screw up again".
Despite their repeated attempts to cause a mistrial they are being treated more than fairly & it's happening in everybody's faces.
This judge must go into chambers as soon as court adjourns and immediately pour herself a very stiff drink.
I think its her disdain for Alex and his people for continuously breaking the rules. Whether you like him or not, his side has done nothing but break rules throughout the case.
@@stevenichols2938 Her disdain is from her being an sjw activist.
@@informationwarlord As someone actually old enough to drink, she seems fine.
She probably drinking before she looks a mess
She’s sickeningly obnoxious . . .
They had months to prepare for this trial and they still show up like if they are being tought how the process works.
Oh no, Renault is fully aware of what he's doing. If he can get the judge to declare a mistrial due to incompetence or negligence, it starts the whole trial over which could push it out 6 months to a year allowing Infowars to monetize the whole thing.
They actively fight the process so they can claim it's rigged.
@Tate Speaks, no, not really. The judge is tired of the incompetence of Jones's lawyers.
If everyone else isn't supposed to talk about the case when in court, why would you give a pass to Jones's crew?
@Tate Speaks One sided?? She's being incredibly fair.
@Tate Speaks why? I don't see a reply to that comment. You obviously don't understand how court proceedings work.
So sick of the juvenile behavior coming out of adults, where political bias decides the results of a case. Disgusting!
Gaslighting judge makes up laws as she goes along?
"Do you understand?"
"Crystal."
No. Stop acting like she asked, "Is that clear?"
Yeah, he thought that'd sound cool. He's been watching too many movies.
He thought he was Jack Nicholson for a sec
Cope
You're a birdbrain... "Crystal"
"enough with the aw shucks, I don't know the rules of court" lol. First time I've seen this judge really aggravated. Have to agree the defense has been trying for a mistrial.
The Judge is a blue haired Freak, get a clue.
Who cares if she’s aggravated I couldn’t care less about this clown show judge
@@averyshenan958 how is she a clown show? Maybe don’t lie and look like a clown.
5:43 “I mis-interpreted the rrrrrules” ~ Eric Cartman
@@averyshenan958 Don't care, didn't ask
audio quality is awesome!! thank god they have microphones of such great quality.
I mean just look at this judge. Do we need to say anything else? Look at her and listen to her voice. She represents the gestapo of the US criminal justice system.
She's compromised.
This woman wears her disdain for Infowars on her face.
She's actually a decent judge. Jones' attorney keeps failing him (and Jones being already a failure, doesn't need more of it).
As do MILLIONS of US citizens who know a charlatan when we hear one.
I like it 💙🦋🇺🇲
Guess it's a good thing she's not on the jury, eh. Then when he loses you can't blame the judge.
You sure that's a woman?
Kangaroos court with a moronic judge. This is going to easily be overturned on appeal.
the judge can be saved with brain force
Alex is never going away. Lol
Somehow Alex managed to also make his own attorney a victim in this trial.
If he did his job correctly then he wouldn’t have to worry about being corrected.
The sarcasm rolling off the judge when she scolds defense counsel: "Enough with the aw-shucks, I don't understand the rules." 🤣🤣🤣🤣Priceless!
That's pretty un-fuggin-becoming of a judge though
@@bct321 why’s that? Because it hurt your butt to have them called out? She’s actually being overly patient with them. You sound like you haven’t been around a courtroom much.
@@bct321 Judges do this all the time, especially whe the Quaker Oats Instant Lawyer (tm) should certainly know better.
@@bct321 I say that was pretty un-fuggin-civilized of Jones harassing parents and spreading lies about dead children.
@@bct321 When a lawyer deliberately tries to undermine the court proceedings in order to get a mistrial, it is quite normal for a judge to be quite short with the lawyer, and he definitely deserved it. I wouldn't be surprised if he faces repercussions from the bar for this.
Man she slapped that lawyer so hard even I felt it.
Hr deserves it!!!
She slapped him so hard, they gave her Will Smith’s Oscar for Best Actor.
nah a slap would've been sanctions or even a contempt of court citation. this was just a finger wagging.
@@oldfrend Can't argue with that. But, to be honest, I had moderate to low expectations throughout this whole ordeal, and I'm surprised that Jones and his lawyers are getting some (albeit incomplete) comeuppance.
This judge needs to be tossed in jail and all of the cases she has presided over need to be voided. She is not impartial and is not upholding the law and constitution. This judge is committing a criminal act punishable by the death penalty.
I thought it was the job of the prosecutor to prosecute and the judge's job was merely to judge.
He already lied under oath. No way a person can become an attorney without remembering what was discussed. This attorneys attorney license needs to be reviewed by the BAR counsel
@Czeslaw P. No, he should not cultist.
@@allenmckinney2082 You all believe the same things, say the same things, and act the same. Yet somehow the people who dare to say "hey let's look into things instead of believing the narrative 100% every time" somehow they're the brainwashed ones right? Take a second to really think. You're the bad guy.
Actually Czeslaw P this is the part of the process to decide he is going to pay. Already found guilty.
@@PaulA-pg7jm even though he did no wrong. This judge is a sjw vigilante& has a history of being an activist from the bench, not a referee.
@@allenmckinney2082 Bot account.
i love how these people love to claim they love the rule of law and the constitution BUT completely dont abide by it, and then complain about the laws..
they only respect maritime law
No, Democrats don't even claim to love law or Constitution, they are proudly anarchist
Can you provide a specific example?
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5to idk what he's on about. Sounds to me like the defense attorney gave improper court instructions. How is that AJ 's or Owen's fault?
yep they are the definition of hypocrites. it blows my mind people actually listen to these guys. really makes me question humanity as a whole
I've never gotten a stronger "weasel" vibe from a lawyer than this guy
NAH: You're still young. You will meet more like him--if you live long enough. One of them came up to me in the courtroom, put his hand on my left shoulder, and said, out of the blue, "We're all looking out for your interests Mr. Clark." I looked him in the eye and told him, "If you don't get your hand off me I'm going to break your arm." His eyes got real big when he saw that I was just about to do it, pulled his arm back and walked back to his pew. He came very very close to being hospitalized. I guess he had never met a man who just didn't care and because of that was very very dangerous. Most people are worried about what the others think of them and submit like puppies and pee on the floor.
@@jayclark2077 things and stories no one asked for LOL
Let’s Jan6 he’s law offices.
Not sure why this judge isn't in front of a judicial review board.
"Do you understand?"
"Crystal."
He can't even use the correct response.
I caught that, too. She did not ask, "Am I clear?"
He had probably decided that morning that no matter what happened he would throw in a Tom Cruise quote at some point. That was the opportunity he needed.
@@jockejocke1 ABSOLUTELY, THAT SO CALLED ATTORNEY IS WORSE THAN LIONEL HUTZ.
He was correcting the Judge. His name is actually Crystal.
He was asking for Crystal the hooker that explains the things to him when he is too high on cocaine.
I could never be a judge. I would be throwing half of them in jail before the trial even started.
😅🤣😂I know that's right!!!
That would be the right thing to do 😀
Amen 🤣
Because due process is only for people you approve of. You would have been a perfect judge
Don't worry they would never allow kids to become judges, they are called sentences not tantrums.
Now we get jailed for paying attention
The system has failed
I think some of you are very behind, first alex has already been found liable, second theres no jury in the room during this, third the lawyer knew the rules and is trying for a mistrial, fourth there is no prosecution because this is a civil case, and lastly this is not a rule the judge just made up out of thin air the witness is lucky he didn’t get in more trouble.
THANK YOU
There is a jury present in this trial to determine damages.
@@tamarathelawfirm6914 yes, but they weren't in the courtroom during this clip is what they meant
that makes sense, I did not know the jury is not in the room, I was thinking it was not fair as though she is acting as an atorney rather than neutral, but no jury in room then makes ok for judge to raise these concers
@@bryangipe1 how is ok for judge to ask these kinds of questions?
Look at their faces blush because they KNOW they are lying and being caught in their lies. what despicable people.
Regular yt men who fully believed that the law doesn't apply to them and they have complete impunity from the law, as the bullying legacy of this nation instructs them.
Ok Karen
this judge is way too lenient
I have appeared in front of many judges as a probation officer and these dudes had best be shaking in their boots, this lady is as serious as a heart attack...
I think I'm more accurate description is crookeder than a dog's hind leg.
Kangaroo Court
She’s biased lib and shouldn’t be a judge. This dude was hung out to dry. It’s not about whether this is right or wrong it’s about the constitution. It’s 1st amendment right…but that doesn’t matter anymore. This country is in bad shape.
@@jakemoeller7850 dude get a grip on reality...
@@bushidonation7835 I don't know what courts you worked in, but I have worked in a few and found the judge's approach was reasonable. When a judge gives you specifics about procedure you may not agree, but you comply. Sorry, Vinnie, if you don't agree with the judge you can appeal to a higher court, but as this attorney found out you ignore a judge's instructions at your own and your client's peril.
The judges' sigh at 3:38 says it all
This is a political witch-hunt and the judge is highly biased
It does say it all
She is hungry. Looks that way for sure.
What does it say? What insights are you guys seeing? A sigh would be better than an actual contempt charge for doing what one has already been instructed not to do....right?
@Money Moe Disgusting woman gave cheeks for her degree.
"you said that during the show you had a two minute coffee break, but it was actually a 5 minute break!"...
You cannot discuss about an ongoing case that’s easily viewable in public 🙃
When you're an active part of the trial, no, you can't. Baby's first trial?
As fantastical as it may be, this group is even more inept than the Amber Heard crew. Good God Almighty!
🤣🤣💯
@Dik Hurtz well yeah it defies credulity that there isn’t some intent. I kinda suspected the same with AH’s team at one point
It is always difficult defending a weak position.
A totally complete BS positions.
When you are a vile client with a losing case your choice of lawyers is limited.
Now, that's argumentative!
If the attorney is deliberately trying for an ineffectiveness of counsel appeal, it should also end up with the permanent revocation of his license to practice law..
Is Owen Shroyer a "Defendant" or a "Witness"? If he is a Witness who should have told him the "RULES"? The Prosecutor or the Defendants Council?
Conjecture, that’s not the law. Legal strategy IMO for mistrial. Great idea.
@@supermankent1041 I think the issue is that Shroyer discussed it publicly on the air with Jones, who is a defendant and should have been notified of the rule. I believe that he was informed but paid it no mind.
@@alienated1748 except the lawyer for the plaintiffs was smart enough to know the rules of evidence and the judge figured it out and did enough to curb that idea.
The trial is broadcasted to the entire world...but it cannot be talked on a show !S
This judge was the world's biggest Karen. Totally unprofessional and obviously biased.
I have been a juror and been a witness in court. When the judge tells you something you better listen. This attorney needs to be disbarred.
Kangaroo show trial. Why should they not talk about the trail. What is this court hiding.
@@zackthebongripper7274 Why would they allow different rules for just this trial?
@@dutchdna He is spamming that everywhere. He has no clue how court works.
@@zackthebongripper7274 if you went to college you’d understand things like this a little better
I pray you are never a juror again.
They must all practice that same Tucker Carlson "puzzled" look, the look of I'm too naïve to lie and by questioning me you are "picking" on me.
The Curly Howard look when Moe is chewing him out.
Yes cuz CNN, MSNBC have just so much integrity! Lol
@@justinkassinger8238 what does your comment have to with these Alex Jones losers looking like clueless scared children about to burst into tears?
That heavy sigh she let's out just after saying "actually, I'm going to read something to you..."
Ty brother... speaking truth
I’m confused….. they cannot go on their podcast and talk about the trial, but we can watch the trial on television and see the whole thing to include when the jury isn’t present.
You aren't involved with the trial, you are only a spectator.
The Judge has had it w/ the shenanigans...
She ain't playin'...
" WATCH IT..."🤨🤨🤨
This is what a kangaroo court looks like folks.
She sounds and looks like she is adressing a toddler. Rightfully so.
look at the state of that so called judge
She just seems like she’s had enough of these guys being unprofessional in this case.
She had enough the moment she was appointed to this case. She has been bias from the beginning.
Yeah I know this judge personally, she actually mentored me in Boy Scouts. She hates Alex.
If that were true contempt motions would be flying off the bench, and rightfully so
@@justinc8147 yeah biased for the truth, something that Jones and his charlatan attorney don't believe in.
Its their pathetic attempt to, get a mistrial,
But your the one who is biased, if you think Jones should get away with it
@@justinc8147 Liar. Jones has gotten an insane amount of leeway while constantly flouting the rules.
Your Honor, everything that happens in this courtroom is on RUclips...
And...?
Witnesses will be in contempt of court if they view it.
@@gustaaf1892 are you suggesting there are people out there that can resist viewing RUclips?
1000% Exactly Sir
The court is live streaming the proceedings through the court’s own channel on RUclips. Following the live stream, recordings of the proceedings have been acquired by Law and Crime with prior consent and approval by the judge.
If the parties and the witnesses would like to discuss the court’s proceedings outside of the court, then prior consent and approval by the judge would be needed.
Otherwise, if the parties and the witnesses discuss the court’s proceedings outside of court without prior consent and approval by the judge, then the party and witnesses involved in the discussion will incur the consequences as determined by the judge.
In short, don’t disobey the judge’s rules.
This lawyer and his firm are probably never going to have another client ever again. What a hopeless team. So many screw ups both in and outside of court.
Prae. AU: Never hire an attorney who is not a Bull Dog who will fight because that's what he loves to do!
@@jayclark2077 What are you talking about ?
@@prumbuggel: Is there a problem with my English? Or are you one of those citizens who has never been in a court room and has no idea of the dangers of that system of injustice?
@@jayclark2077 I was trying to clarify what you are on about, since your answer doesn't make any sense.
Same with your reply to me just now.
WTF are you on about ?
You do know that Doofus McMullet behaved like a clown during this whole trial ?
Like...objecting without even being able to explain on what grounds.
Trying to introduce evidence EXPLICITLY excluded beforehand.
Reading from documents not entered into evidence in front of the jury.
Oh yeah...and ACCIDENTALLY sending the plaintiff's attorneys tons of his client's phone records. When they notified him, he didn't reply properly and the plaintiff's attorneys were able to use the documents to demonstrate that Alex had perjured himself.
Additionally, McMullet now is in trouble in ANOTHER state because within the documents were medical records of the plaintiffs in ANOTHER case which he wasn't allowed to have in the first place.
So yeah, by all means, keep babbling on. Have fun !
@@jayclark2077 I think it was a problem with your English.
He didn't look quite so cocky as he left the witness box as he did when he stepped up to it. Lol .
🤣🤣🤣
My head itches when someone tries to bs me. My head started itching when the lawyer responded to the judge after hearing the rules of the court AGAIN. 🤦🏾♀️omg.
Why can't he discuss a trial that is being televised live?
Witness are not suppose to discuss the trial! They aren’t even allowed to sit in the courtroom while others testify, they only can after they testify & are dismissed!
@@linger4605 No I get that he can't, I was just wondering why that's a rule for a televised case.
@@emmyh6617
Do you understand it now or do you require further explanation?
@@emmyh6617 Learn.
@@fugeefaceentropy7008 No, why don't you explain it further. What is the purpose of the rule, what is the reasoning behind it?
right off the bat I'm witnessing a judge assist the prosecutor in questioning. which is highly illegal.
has this judge been brought to an investigation yet?
Mistrial / judge recuse yourself
When a judge actually lectures you in court. That means Alex has already lost this case.
He did lose case. This is penalty phase
Genius
The issue here is the biased judge had already made up her mind what she would do. She's hanging someone with her bias behavior. No judge should be biased.
@@teresasevans1926 Lay off the Insta Hard, Teresa.
@@teresasevans1926 that's right.....the judge deemed Jones guilty without a trial.
This case is about lying and irresponsibility. After copious amounts on manure being spread, the judge has every right to call them out.
Will this apply to CNN for all the lies that they spew constantly?
Sandy hook was f@ke. We don't care what corrupt courts try to do, they will not silence us including Alex Jones.
@@joshuacolon285 no, because CNN is not on trial here and therefore not bound by the rules of this court…. Isn’t that obvious…? If CNN were involved in another court case they could be bound by the rules of that court. 😅
The judge seems a little biased lol
I’m not a lawyer, but tell me if I have this correct. The judge just told a witness, who hasn’t been charged and who is not on trial, the he is not allowed to discuss any details of this case in any capacity, but; especially on an infowars show, and if he does, he could be held in contempt of court? Is this legitimate? What exactly is going on here?
He is trying anything he can to get a mistrial
Too late for that. He already got himself a default judgement, he’s going for default award apparently, if there is such a thing
worse case scenario as the judge stated is that she has to instruct the jury to disregard the defense testimony and only use the plaintiff's. which only makes it more likely that the damages will be greater for Alex Jones
it's ridiculously obvious .
And get his license to practice law removed?
@@grammarlings6517 generally bar associations do not like killing one of their own. He will likely get sued by Alex (lol, if he can find a lawyer willing to take him as a client) and the state bar and courts will sanction him. Remember he is not a Texas lawyer. He is here pro hac vice
Jone's team is trying their best to make grounds for a mistrial.
Breaching the most basic orders of the court 😂😂🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
The trial is publicly taped and shown all over the world in real time.
And it is basic and normal procedure for the participants in a trial to have a gag order. Welcome to the adult world.
An experienced defense attorney claiming not to have understood the court's instructions? Oh, give me a blasted break!
$162 million in revenue in the last 3 years and that's the best attorney that kind of $ can buy?
@@usualsuspectsfor1k --
As far as I'm concerned, this lawyer is as ignorant and irresponsible as his client. I guess millions of dollars can't buy common sense.
@@usualsuspectsfor1k
I mean he already went to a bunch of them. But to be fair none of those seemed to be very competent. They afterall managed to default their clients case.
Slap on the wrist , good move .
Pretty sure a default guilty judgement (which is what this is) is a sham to begin with.. If I was the defense lawyer I would break some rules to try and save my client from getting railroaded.
This is what happens when they don’t hire Jacky Child’s to represent them. Jacky would be horrified, mortified, stupefied and shamed by this!
jackie puppet would be like: woo-hoo!
Ha! Ha! That was a very funny character.
Who?
@kev dimo.....outrageous!!!! Preposterous!!!!
Omg this is a great analogy! Imagine if that were the case??!! 🤣🤣🤣 dude I would tune in every minute if Mr Jacky Child’s were there
Owen Shroyer is great. Alex Jones was ahead of his time.
*is
This trial just keeps giving and giving. I have to go back and watch from the beginning now
Wow, after the judge reprimanded this little wannabe beau mit with its shapely facial fur his bulb was getting redder and redder every minute . 🤪🤣🤣🤣
Real men wear beards such as myself. Real masculine men