Alex Jones Defense Files Emergency Motion
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 авг 2022
- The defense filed an emergency of protection regarding Alex Jones' attorney F. Andino Reynal accidentally sending Jones' cellphone record to plaintiffs' attorney Mark Bankston. The defense asked for a mistrial but was denied.
#AlexJones #Defamation #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam - Развлечения
Liar Liar 😂😂
"Objection your honour"
"On what grounds?"
"It's devastating to my case!"
Excellent 😆👍
Over ruled!!!
cam must be held for contempt of court
That scene in the elevator always cracked me up 😆
"Mama" 🍈🍈👀
Touché my friend 👌
If you could get a mistrial based on your own mistakes, no client would ever lose!
😆 🤣 😂 😹
(cue sound of thousands of Defense lawyers falling on their own swords)
Her bias is his mistake?
I was just about to post the same thing. 👍
Forget the fact that the lawyer tried to backdoor it's admission into the record by asking the defendant Abt it on the stand to open the door for admissibility!! The lawyer sent a LINK, NOT DOCUMENTS. If wrong mail is delivered, do u open it? No. Link was clicked.
The fact the lawyer first denied having the documents they were requested to provide, and then didn’t send another link “correct” link within those ten days shows they had no intention of honouring either the law or their own word. So, no, you can’t have a mistrial.
I can't figure out how the judge could keep a straight face! Pure professionalism! :)))
Nailed it
As soon as I heard about it, it seemed to be a strategic move to make a reason to scream mistrial. They knew what they were doing.
Soooo, this is literally the "can I have a mistrial because my lawyers are incompetent" but from the lawyer's side.
@Margie Smith It's just a delay tactic so jones can move his money so they cannot get it.
I have been a trial lawyer for 30 years, and this is massive, career impacting malpractice in my opinion. However, much of the material SHOULD have been discovered. There was no objection to it yesterday. Defense will lose this motion.
Defense already lost the motion. Judge is giving the defense attorney 1 day to identify privilege which is her being kind, because under Texas law he had 10 days from the day of notification and there is no wiggle room in it.
I have a feeling that law students will be reading about this for years to come.
@@numus19 this is now becoming a constitutional issue because the Jan 6th committee is requesting them
This judge shouldn't be giving "wiggle room"
Yeah that's what I'm wondering. Isn't their failure to open this already during discovery also a major sign of malpractice on at least someone's part?
The best Jones can hope for to recoup the savage financial loss he will endure is to sue his lawyers for malpractice. 50 cent sued his lawyers for 18 million for malpractice and won..
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake
Thanks, Napoleon😏
Always act like your hunting and being hunted in life.
"please proceed, Governor" moment lmao
that need to be on a shirt
@@damaka I wonder if Alex Jones remembered who said that. Hint: in 2016 he also said at a commencement speech: "let the FOOL talk."😉😉😏
The Depp trial, The Jones Trial, several other recent high profile trials, really make a poor argument for the competency of high paid lawyers.
Their Legal Assistant must have been fired for that mistake.
I've seen others argue that the Lawyer was trying to bring about a mistrial. I'd be amazed such a tactic would work, but, it's probably the only actual option he had given who his client is.
Same with Elizabeth Holmes' lawyer, if the system remotely worked right that guy would be in prison.
you have no idea about these "high profile" lawyers - all they want is big fish to milk money out while getting in to law schools through privilege.
you should see how Amy Corey got into supreme court
God that lawyer wining and the end just throwing out dying pleas to limit damage is just pathetic. Been in a lot of courtrooms and not once seen such an awful legal arguments
@bouytt guyt
Ok, bot
the word is whining.
The judge was correct. If a defendant's attorney could get a mistrial by purposefully or accidentally sending his attorney-client notes to the opposing attorney, there could never be a guilty verdict.
The judge is not correct. The plaintiff's attorney is bound by law and should have known that those files are protected information and should never have been brought to trial.
@@rllr1117 I'm rolling with the judge, on this .....
The original comment is still true, if defence attorneys could just send private documents to the plaintiff / prosecution and get a mistrial, every defence would ‘accidentally’ do that whenever they’re bombing a case.
That’s what’s possibly happened here, the attorney being notified of his mistake over a week ago and only now using it for a mistrial. 🤔
@@rllr1117 Interesting. Has any of the Info they want suppressed been used as evidence in the trial? I'm confused as to exactly what they want removed as it appears the Judge is too. I thought it was fair how she ruled. They bring exactly what they want removed and rule on just that as opposed to throwing all of it out and leaving the Pros. Without
Not correct. The text message - the only used material - was supposed to have been provided. It just displayed perjury. Plus if you heard the lawyer, he clearly pointed out the legal technicality of what should have been done - which was not.
Isn't that a lot like asking for a mistrial because you accidentally admitted to a crime you committed?
It's EXACTLY like...
A friend of mine was mugged and the police caught thentwo men.
At the trial my friend was on the stand and was asked "Are the men who attached in the courtroom today?.
The two defendants raised their hands.
🤣😂🤣😂😅
@@hopefletcher7420 LMFAO. You're lying. Tell me you're lying. 😆
@@hopefletcher7420 "No further questions" xD
As someone with absolutely zero formal experience with law, this motion sounds essentially like "due to my failure to properly do my job as a lawyer, this should be a mistrial". Can anyone with a legal background let me know whether or not this is accurate?
I only have a legal undergrad degree and work as a paralegal but I completely agree!
“The judge was correct. If a defendant's attorney could get a mistrial by purposefully or accidentally sending his attorney-client notes to the opposing attorney, there could never be a guilty verdict.”
Why did the judge not ask the defense attorney the question "After you learned that you had provided confidential information, did you make any attempt at all to identify those documents that must be returned? Why not?"
@@DG-nk7jo If it was a "mistake", then there was a much bigger mistake in not following the procedure to assert privilege over the documents.
"We want the cellphone records thrown out. Yes, the same same cellphone records that Mr. Jones said do not exist"
Revisionist history, he said he couldn't find them, not that they didn't exist.
@@smeff099 "revisionist" history, it's called a mistake ... relax
@@smeff099 no he literally said they don’t exist and he checked himself.. also said he hasn’t sent emails in over a decade
@@mervcharles8365 didn't he also say that he turned over his entire phone as well? It seemed he had no idea what the attorney was asking...since he didn't know his team had "mistakenly" turned over ever communication they had ever had. His answer would have been relevant to what was known to him and concerning information that was public. It's ridiculous that people can't just be honest about this case.
So no privacy is what you believe in
This Lawyer will forever be the dude who sent the file that doomed his client
he was plenty doomed before. just icing for the cake.
His client was already doomed.
He has been doomed several times over, at this point.
The trial was already concluded and he was found guilty, this is just about the amount he will pay. I think this moves the ruling from $50 million to the full $147 million they requested. Furthermore these documents will be available for anyone else that wants to make a claim against jones and the jan 6 committee. This might lead to bigger fish.
or he did what the law required and protected his license.
I went back and saw again the clip were the lawyer brings to Jones attention the "unintentional" disclosure. It's worth watching the defense lawyer reaction (which is null). Makes me think it was designed to throw the plaintiff into a last minute scavenger hunt, and hopefully if they use anything that can be considered as confidential, file for mistrial
Gamble’s reaction to this whole thing is just chef’s kiss. “Okay, just review all 300gb worth of information by the end of the day and let’s see what we can do because you had a long time to figure this out when you were suppose to do this”
I think we can all come together and fans and foes of Alex Jones to agree that this is one of the worst blunders in sensational court history.
or a desperate attempt at a mistrial
And it happened to the right guy 🤣 it pointed out some of his lies, so I call it poetic justice
Yep🤭
@@knowledgeispower5142 like the judge said.. attempt at mistrial for the 17th time
@Ricky M. No blunder. Just designed to create the exact motion being brought here. A Defence 'Hail Mary' no less.
The fact that they are asking for a mistrial says to me it was done on purpose so that they could try to get a mistrial
He fails to prove his statement: we asked them to delete the things they were not supposed to have. He is lying.
Seems so.
Considering that the parties who've read the communications all say something along the lines of "wait until law enforcement gets hold of this", I'd strongly doubt it was sent on purpose. I'd wager that it was sent accidentally, then they decided the way to profit from the mistake might be to cry mistrial if the trial went particularly badly for them, which it did.
Becsuse this judge is corrupt! Nazie wanna be! They should get another court and judge because of this rotten liberal judge!!
Mistrials are granted when the other side screws up so much it’s unfair, not when your own side screws up. How they thought that the judge would grant it is beyond ludicrous.
So-wait-he's saying that evidence he claimed did not exist (but really did, in fact, exist) was "mistakenly" sent to the plaintiff attorney..so it should be treated as if it didn't exist....? lol
The defence and AJ made sworn statement that those evidence did not exists during discovery. However through this accidental disclosure of document after those sworn statement made, the plaintiff found evidence that defence and AJ lied under oath.
This channel needs to update its recording equipment! In order to hear the courtromm voices it you have to turn it up full blast and when the ads come on you're blown out of your chair! As fascinating as this channel is, subscribing is out of the question!
Defense: Claims blanket privilege over the entire data dump.
Judge: What is in the data dump that is privileged?
Defense: We don't know your honor. Can we have more time to look at it?
Judge: It's been a year and we've had dozens of disclosure hearings on this matter.
Defense: .............
Only the best for Mr. Jones.
"Can I have a mistrial based on the fact I am a terrible lawyer"? lol
I like how the other attorney laid it all out yesterday so this is all fraud today.
😂👍
🤣🤣🤣 good one!! Lmao 😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤓🤓😏
Next breaking news: Alex Jones fires his attorney, demands a mistrial because his attorney's send "by mistake" "without" his consent sending to opposing party evidence against him. You can't make write a better script with these losers.
Imagine hiring this lawyer, I’d want a refund. The judge trying not to laugh is priceless
Jones's 11th lawyer for this case...
@@AlphaF28
How so, explain
You only pay for what you need
@@Ralphie5023 😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣 Where's Emu when I need him? You got me rolling!!! Thanks very much! 🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾
I'm sure the lawyer's staff is at fault, but he is ultimately responsible for what is shared. Almost seems it was deliberately sent by one of his staff members to help bury Alex Jones.
So, the defense attorney's office screwed up as well as being lazy and not responding promptly to the plaintiff's question regarding the materials. The only opportunity I see for Mr. Jones is to sue his own attorney for incompetence and the judge (as she did) exclude the medical records from being able to be presented.
He can't. His complaint would amount to "My lawyers failed to properly help me coverup my perjury and hide evidence." The substance of the damage is that his texts are public, the same ones that were ordered public. The complaint is that he wanted to illegally hide them. Jones loses all rights to blame his representation when he's caught conspiring with them criminally.
This is the only time I've seen Court proceedings that were more insane than Alex Jones video broadcast.
I love how he threw out the part about text messages between Jones and Stone. In other words, Jan. 6th committee, we have some text messages you might want to see.
The subpoena is already in from the sound of it. That was a hilarious throwaway. LOL what a screwup.
Ah yes the OTHER witch hunt
Hahahaha so good
Alex is probably using one of Roger's lawyers now. This looked like something out of a SNL skit.
Jones lawyer should be embarrassed, making that mistake and then failing to do anything about it within 10 days. A bit rich to ask for a mistrial when you are the culprit.
He should be more than embarrassed. It's unacceptable. He needs to have his license reviewed, or something. Anything.
Not that I'm defending him, but he has to "earn" those fees now.
good to see people would perfer the prosecutor to proceed with full force against jones and his lawyer but i doubt people in the comment section would appreciate that code of conduct being brought onto their judgement. i see a whole lot of hypocrites with popcorn watching this trial
I think he did it on purpose hoping they would use it and then call for a mistrial. He also accused the plaintiff’s attorneys for doing it to get a mistrial, when really how would that help the plaintiff. I think he thinks he was being smart and he’s really not. I think there’s a press conference at the Four Seasons Landscaping Co. 😂
Malfeasance for sure!
I loved the smile the persecutor gave the defense attorney at the end. Priceless!
Jones' lawyer is the gift that keeps on giving.😂
Any lawyer that messes up this badly needs to be reviewed. Doesn't matter which side they are on. It's a level of incompetence that should be penalized.
It was by design
That’s why lawyers pay for legal malpractice insurance.
I agree with you he should be investigated for misconduct.
I don't think this was a mistake. They did it to get a mistrial. These attorneys have done this successfully in other cases for Jones.
There are going to be multiple sanctions against that attorney after the trial ends. Btw no one would purposely give someone's full phone data for 2 years to the opposition, anyone thinking that is a lemming
Another instance of terrible judgement on Jones' part. The level of self destruction over these past few years is astounding.
It must be difficult to sit through such an eviscerating deconstruction of your legal practice
100% correct. That’s a FU of gargantuan scope unlikely to be topped.
And yet... my sympathy is at a zero. No objection raised during the use of this material at AJ's cross exam, didn't follow the rule. BOOM
Looks like defense attorney is now fighting that long vacation that is in his future why didn't he object when his client was asked about it on the stand little to late now
Jones would have been better off complying with the laws. Because he failed to comply refusing to show for court and failing to supply discovery information, in Texas, you get this trial. He had his chance. But either way, his arrogance and lies and his millions won’t save him. Now the government will have access to his phone records. That and the fact is that he is guilty. Same thing will happen to Fox entertainment.
@@valeciareynolds4847 the BAR F@CKS both parties, all spectrums. Dr King to Malcom X. Their role is to create barriers so the "little people" of all ilks can not rise
It's like hitting reply-all on a company wide email...
During the opening statement, the first thing that Alex's lawyer said was "Do not lie to jury. That is what I learned as a young law student". Now they got caught lying.
Basically “we accidentally sent you evidence that proves our client is lying and guilty “
What this reads like is a Hail Mary to force a mistrial.
And the classic argument “This is all being done for the cameras” lmao
Not just that - it was "we accidentally sent you evidence that proves our client is lying and guilty which we should have sent a year ago anyway to opposing counsel."
And also reads, Alex jones played a huge part in the Jan 6. Riots! Lol
They can't use that evidence though
Remember when we all thought Amber Heard's lawyers were bad? lol! This is incompetence on an absolutely epic scale.
Yesssss
Have to agree, this is terrible on both sides and judge.
Lionel Hutz was a more competent "lawyer". 😂😂
I'm starting to think this happens all the time, we just don't hear about it.
@@dorothymiddaugh6234 No. The defence is absurdly incompetent. This judge is terrific and the Plaintiff’s attorneys are doing a fantastic job.
As a legal assistant, I have done this. Everything’s electronic now and I have to serve opposing counsel correspondence addressed to them with attachments. I also have to serve our client everything that I serve on opposing counsel. So there’s two emails. One to opposing counsel, and one to my client. Do you know how easy it is to click the wrong document and forward it? It is very easy. I did this once and it happened to be a status report and plan of action addressed to our client. I sent it to opposing counsel so they knew our plan of action. I immediately notified my boss of my mistake. I had to call posing counsel and indicate that I just sent them privileged information and asked them to destroy it immediately. They of course agreed. However, my attorney had to alter his plan of action for the adjudication of the remaining claim. It really sucked. No, I did not get fired. My job understands that people are human. Plus, we’re not talking about millions of dollars in my area of law. And my mistake in no way compromised the result of the case. It just sucked.
Omg that smile from the lawyer to the other lawyer at the end! Omg!
You know the plaintiff’s attorneys did their homework before they introduced it into evidence.
He’s good. No denying that.
A gamble that his follow up conduct ensured would fail.
Yeah burn the witch and his attorney!
@@anthonybyrnes2561 What do you mean?
They were told to disregard the link as it was for the Connecticut lawsuit and violated attorney client privilege.
“What is this, like the 17th time you’ve asked for a mistrial?” Love it. As a lawyer, I can tell you that you only ask for a mistrial when you know you’re in big big trouble
Never do it when stuff is actually f-ed up. Nope. Only when you're in trouble. For sure dude. Totally......
"As a lawyer?" Lol
Well I’m also a lawyer and I also agree
@@joshuaedwards3322
You do know people are lawyers, doctors, nurses, cops etc
It IS a profession, there ARE thousands of them out there, 2 on my own street.
Just because you didn't go to school past grade 8 doesn't mean that the rest of us didn't either.
@@SofaKingwetodded93 and Im also a client... lol
Hands down, the last 30 seconds are the best! 😂 📸
The smile on the prosecution lawyers face was awesome
Kids…this is an example of how NOT to practice law. It’s like big brother telling mom that little brother was the one that broke the window.
The judge isn't following law either.
@@davidarnold344 Really? Please be specific how she is not following TEXAS LAW.
The only issue is that AJ can blame his lawyer on appeal.
That he tries to blame plaintiff attorney for his screw up is laughable at a minimum.
Actually not a bad argument. If in possesion of improperly sent material and the other attorney admitted it was, he has a duty to turn it back over. The other attorney should have looked through it first and if he found any relevant stuff he could have gone after Jone's attorney for not turning over all relevant info.
@@dostoyevesky12 corrext
@@dostoyevesky12 Bankston told him. He had 10 days to do anything about it. he didn't.
@@dostoyevesky12 That is where the 10 days comes in. That is why it is laughable. He (jones atty) allowed the 10 days to lapse w/out disputing his error and now that it has blown in his face he is trying to lay blame where it doesn't belong.
@@dostoyevesky12 No, no he does not. He has a duty to inform opposing counsel of the mistake, which he did. He would then have a duty to turn back over anything that the opposition went through and properly marked as confidential as per the actual written procedural rules. Which they did not do.
I have been a trial lawyer for over 20 years, and this is not only malpractice, but also should result in a charge against Jones for perjury given the content of the phone. I hope the defense counsel has already notified his malpractice carrier.
The defense counsel's malpractice carrier's paralegals are already writing parody notices (distributed internally only) to him explaining, in painfully humorous detail, why his claim for malpractice is being terminated with extreme prejudice.
The judge, parents,and their attorney should be arrested, charged, and prosecuted under title 18 U.S.C. sections 241 conspiracy against rights and 242 deprivation of rights under color of law by violating Alex Jones 1st amendment constitutionally protected rights (liberties) freedom of speech,if Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech,then the justice department (courts) cannot legally charge or force anyone to pay anyone anything for something they said. The court is bound under the constitution of the united states of America. The judge and attorney should be charged and prosecuted under title 5 U.S.C. sections 3331,3333,7311 perjury in violating oath of office which is treason and a felony for violating Alex Jones constitutionally protected rights (liberties) which is treason and a felony under state and federal law.
U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice, Freedom of speech.
@@Fee.1 the judge should be disbarred and prosecuted.
The attorney of the parents should be disbarred for treason, perjury in violating oath of office. This case should have been thrown out of court.
U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice, Freedom of speech.
"Mr Bankston?"
"Sure!"
Oh you know he's enjoying every moment of this.
Alex Jones' lawyer has the same intelligence as his audience.
I concur wholeheartedly!🤣
@@dwc7325 Yeah, maybe. At the very least, this guy had the brainpower to get through law school.
And.....school in general.
Which is kind of beyond the average Alex Jones fan.
He just got a mistrial and bought a few more years...bots are the only comments allowed. We love you Alex!!
@@ladyliberty You should learn to read. He requested a mistrial and the judge told him to sit down and shut up.
@@joelwillis2043 it's not up to her...you should know that
If a mistake by your own hand could be used as the basis for a mistrial, then there would never be a trial because any losing party could just go "oops, I sent this document" on purpose and shut everything down. No judge in their right mind would allow for that sabotage of the civil court process.
I know few people said the same but you did good by simplyfing it for everybody , I think you should get more likes.
Yeah sure... but not if he was asked not to view it and did it anyway in court. What country are you from Russia?
@@nANa-bq8xm Your tears are delicious.
that is the reason the receiving lawyer should have sent it back !
@@nANa-bq8xm there's a specific process that should have been followed to address inadvertent discovery. It wasn't followed.
The judge looks so fed up with this.
Mark Bankston just moved up from epic lawyer to top tier lawyer. He is absolutely wrecking the defense.
That defense attorney's gonna be great in traffic court
He is 100% a Giga-Chad at this point. I have a lot of respect for the man.
The look and gesture Mark Bankston gave the defense attorney as they turn to leave was priceless.
I cannot wait to hear what Mark Bankston has to say about this on Knowledge Fight!!
Totally agree he is being Epic. Also, I have to admit this case is probably well below his normal level. It's like an NFL player playing Highschool football. If you listen to him discuss any of the deposition he constantly talks about how easily everyone walked into the traps he laid out, as if they didn't even know traps were allowed. It's pretty hilarious, because most of them showed up like they were going to stonewall him and come out looking good. By the end, they were whimper puppies with their tail tucked between their legs.
Props to the Judge for keeping a straight face when the defense is pretty much saying, its not fair that the prosecution got the evidence that my client lied
When did the defense attorney say they got evidence that my client lied. Since you know, about what? And point it out don't make sweeping comments without detail to back your claims.
@@robertbrown6879 Jones claimed he had no texts from the last two years about Sandy Hook. The defense accidentally sent his phone to the prosecution, which found that he did. That is a lie. Not that hard.
@@robertbrown6879 The prosecution said Jones lied. loser
@@robertbrown6879 you mean like the text messages and emails that under oath was said not to exist?
@@robertbrown6879 Is this a serious question?
I’m not a litigator but am a lawyer and this is out of bounds - he’s committed legal malpractice 😂
Incompetence is a dangerous thing.
Judge : ''Who's asked you to turn over this information?''
Prosecuting Lawyer : ''The January 6th Committee''
Judge to Jones's Lawyer : ''I mean... I don't know that you get to stop that anyways.''
An orgasmic moment.
Judge with poker face, holding back the smiles with that one.
An orgasmic moment when your big nothing burger "Jan 6" turns the same results as Russia Russia Russia and all others: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. You blue anon cultists really need to get mental help and come back to reality.
I love how all these people that hate this country congregate.
That part was funny, because if Jones don't want to release them to the Jan 6, the prosecutor will do under the provision cited.😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@robertbrown6879 you aren't making any sense with that comment.
Wasn’t this motion filed by a “crisis lawyer”?
😂
Pizza Phone Gate
...person, woman, man, camera, tv....
Slow clap. You are the winner of the internet today. 💕
@Gary Miller you can say all the false things you want but when you’re sued you do have to answer questions. Such is justice.
That smirk at the end 😏🤣🤣
The petty smile at the end from the plaintiff’s side is also chefs kiss.
Your honor, it is unfair the plaintiffs attorney caught us lying again and he did it by using the discovery we claimed we did not have. 🤯
🤣
👍
Oh my god that’s so funny
LOL, that sums it up . Good one.
"Your Honor, can I have 10 days from yesterday to review the stuff that I was supposed to review 12 months ago?"
The lawyer asking for 9 extra days to redact is hilarious! It’s like when I’d ask for extra time to do my homework that was due a month prior in primary school
More like asking for extra time to do your homework after the school year is already over.
Unfortunately, you and I are not privileged! This fools seem to catch every break possible!
Now we all understand how he made it through school.
I don't think he wanted the extra days for this trial. I think he was looking down the road to another trial that was mentioned about sharing information and for the Jan. 6 committee. She should have asked for a copy of the files to be preserved on a court server. I wouldn't be surprised if the law offices weren't broken into and the server destroyed or hacked and the hard drive wiped clean. I would have a backup taken of the server and that backup taken offsite.
@@brainfreeze44131 I wasn’t making that claim 😅 read my comment again
The *"cat is out of the bag"* indeed.
What a stellar moment watching Jones reaction to the revelation that his own attorney
torpedoed him by "Accidently?" sending his text messages over a 2 year period to the
prosecution!
Deliberately done ? I think so.
So why wouldn't that be a mistrial??? Something smells fishy not to purposely throw out the word "conspiracy" against Alex Jones.
@@carsonphillips524 Because you can’t use your own incompetency as grounds for a mistrial. Otherwise when you saw the trial heading south you could purposely torpedo it and ask for a mistrial.
@@my2cents809 Not for long because he committed perjury!
Jones' lawyer: “Your Honor, we f**ked up, and it's the plaintiffs' attorney's fault. I rest my case.”
OMG that is too funny!
It’s one thing to accidentally send damaging information to the opposing counsel. Quite another to not invoke the 10 day rule 193.3 to prevent use of material at trial
Especially when 193.3 was done prior. Just complete lazy incompetence
The plaintiffs attorney emailed defendant claiming that they did not download his hard drive yet. It wasn't until yesterday that they revealed that they actually had a copy of the attorneys emails and hard drive.
@@lourendo01 wang dang 👍
@@skyborso4158 Lionel Hutz was a more competent "lawyer". 😂😂
Not really damaging info … it was text message that is out of context
11:44 "Mr Jones intimate messages with Roger Stone" 🤣😂🤣 Bankston 🔥🔥😂
"No you hang up first!"
My favorite part is the conversation about how loud that lady's camera is
Why didnt the attorney file a confidentiality motion within the 10 days? And Now they are using their error to play the”victim”…
Because they didn't realize their mistake before it was revealed in court.
That was my thought. He said it was immediately recognized as a mistake. At first I thought defense was nervous but I was wrong lol. I can't say I've ever witnessed such incompetence and the spinning isn't working 😕
Million dollar question.
Why?
Incompetence. 🐒
@@qwadratix Oh yeah how convenient and also just so happens to be grounds for a mistrial hmmm 🤔
He didn’t object when the attorney mentioned it he just sunk in his seat scratching his head😂😂
The plaintiff's lawyer is brutal🤣🤣🤣
So he refused to hand over when told by court says no emails or texts
Then his lawyer hands texts over 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The paralegal sending the link by accident is understandable but the lawyer not immediately doing everything he can to prevent publishing them is indefensible. If there was ANY questions regarding 10 days then he should have sent 500 emails within that time.
I wonder if maybe the release of the texts were on purpose.
_"The paralegal sending the link by accident is understandable"_ HUH? There is no way in a Trial of this magnitude to excuse what happened. Alex Jones should seek new counsel immediately. I am sure Mr. Jones is spending hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars for competent counsel. This rookie, bush league mistake is unacceptable.
Just a scheme to get a mistrial by crying Privileged Information!
His lawyer was probably drunk and forgot
Exactly 😍💯💯💯💯
My mind is BLOWN by how this "personal injury" attorney has completely out-lawyered Mr Jones's "big-league" attorney... RESPECT👏👏👏
Attorney Lionel Hutz
In an unwinnable case, even a great lawyer can get grilled.
The "big-league" attorney out-lawyered himself.
@@thinkerly1 eh, still gets paid. Probably knew Jones was toast, took a nice retainer, wait til the ruling comes down and Jones declares bankruptcy, then walks away with a nice payday.
@@towel-ie7554 That would be an admirable game plan if it weren't for the enormous malpractice claim he just created vis-a-vis his incompetence. He's in deep water now.
How about NO!
emergency motion - this is like calling the Firefighters when the ashes of your house are already cold
And you set the fire.
@@jx14aby honestly, when Bankston revealed to Jones that he had received those files in error but they weren't marked as privileged within 10 days; I was wondering whether they were playing for a mistrial.
But after hearing the closing arguments I think it was just a whole bunch of dumbassery.
The way the plaintiffs lawyer just grins ear to ear when they get up and leave made my day. Pure joy on that man's face
The ambulance chaser you mean.
@@cult_of_odin do you always try to tell people what they mean as a passive aggressive way of you communicating your little feelings?
You could just say what you think like a big boy...but I don't want to put too much pressure on you. Baby steps.
The judge is supposed to remain unbiased! This woman should be disbarred immediately!
@@jimmyneal1988 *yawn🙄
@@jimmyneal1988 To ignore the abominable behavior of the defense would be to show bias in their favor.
The guy's attorney is dumber than he is. How is that even possible?
Maybe Alex searched for a lawyer and believes him
birds of a feather flock together... even Dodo birds.
@@brainrush3569 That's a good a point. The judge has told this lawyer multiple times to stop using the "I'm a new lawyer" excuse.
@Luigi News Despite the delusions of Nazi idiots, the judge is not biased.
@Luigi News Clearly it isn't considering this guy keeps losing.
1:10 that "good morning" exchange felt so miserable lol
Love it how Plaintiff's lead attorney Mark Bankston gives that big grin to Alex Jones' attorney F. Andino Reynal at end of the hearing! 😁
Translation: "Your honor, we're suppressing evidence that was relevant to discovery. We want a mistrial!"
Judge: "You had 10 days to get this done. Get f*cked!"
No. Discovery can last years. They had *years* in front of the judge to debate this. They had ten days because they sent it out illegally late.
It’s so much easier for the judge to say it that way.
Alex Jones’ lawyer would make me shake in my shoes if I were Alex Jones. One time my financial adviser accidentally emailed me a list with all the names, social security numbers, addresses and investment amounts of ALL his clients. I let him know what he had done and fired him in the same email. He said oh sorry he meant to email it to his secretary who had the same first name as me.
But you didn't just run with it and use all that confidential information, did you? If you did you might be running afoul of many laws and face a bunch of lawsuits. Kind of like the plaintiff's attorney. Wouldn't you think?
In this day and age when unbelievable amounts of information can be contained on computers and links, it's not unusual. Happens all the time.
So did you use all the information you found? Why not? It's OK when they do it though.
His secretary was named Redwoods too?
@@nANa-bq8xm so many butt hurt Alex Jones losers in the chat.
You shredded the info right?
Love the energy of the judge
The Judge is mad about how loud a DSLR is?!
Pretending to be concerned about medical records is laughable.
It's not just that the info was sent by mistake. It's that he had 10 days to fix it and did nothing.
defense lawyer remarkably calm for someone who has committed one of the biggest f-ups possible....
They had plenty of time to sort through those messages and hand over before the trial started and any mistake could have been rectified, but were trying to block access to any of the messages.
If my defense attorney screwed up like this - I'd sue them for malpractice. What a clown show.
I am sure the DOJ would be interested to get the texts Alex Jones sent to everyone regarding the Jan 6th issue
I'd bet they already have that information in their possession. I'm surprised we haven't already heard of any subpoenas being sent from the J6 Committee.
Doubt it, besides Jan 6th isn't the worse thing in the world one person died. But Democrats make it out that it's worse than 9/11
They're on it.
Jan 6 was planned by the left
Oh please, Alex is peaceful. And they already had them on January 7th.
That lawyer is gonna need a lawyer.
“If they subpoena…” “Well they’re going to now!”
Not being a legal person, I hear the presentation of the motion and think to myself, "seems a bit loosey goosey....but I guess I can see the point." I am then thoroughly entertained for the next 15 minutes hearing that argument just being ripped into a trillion pieces. Someone's career is over, SURELY.
I would be looking too change my name and plastic surgery l
James Corden took that motion for mistrial down quick.
@@o.hernandez784 glad to see he’s expanding his portfolio 😂
I don't think it was "accidentally " shared.
@@anthonymordawski6529 Lets not forget gender modification, just for fun.
He should be sanctioned for even asking. He's been aiming for a mistrial the entire time. I'd be very suspicious of his conduct.
Dawn. I know you're at home and bored out of your mind because no job. Please let the adults talk about the law. You don't get sanctioned for defending your client. Before you give some snarky reply like 'well then he shouldnt have sent the files', reflect on all the mistakes you've made in your own life. Like when you screwed up my McDonalds order or when you failed to restock the shelves at Walmart properly. We're all human.
@@tracksuitJohn welp, good sign you all have nothing left when you sink to petty insults. Sorry your messiah mislead you.
@@tracksuitJohn not only did he screw up and accidentally send all the files to the prosecutor, he then failed or was too lazy to seek protection of these files as privileged information. Pure incompetence.
At least . Probably 17 times now according to the judge
@@tracksuitJohn She messed up my mcdonalds order too so I'm not surprised she has no job
Why am I not surprised that this judge couldn't figure out how to turn on a computer?
There's no way it should be that loud lol
The defense attorneys don't even appear to have an inventory of all the information they sent the prosecuting attorneys. Looks to me like the defense tried the old lawyer trick or dumping massive amounts of information, in order to overwhelm the prosecution, and it backfired spectacularly!
Rule #1 of last minute dumps: make sure you know what's in it before sending it! lol
That dog doesn’t hunt. It’s not like AJ was poor and using a pro Bono or percentage law firm. Not reviewing evidence sent, not acting to get it removed, and then denying facts revealed in that evidence is surely beyond “failure” and heading towards sabotage.
What prosecution? This isn't a criminal trial.
it is not defense v prosecution, its defense v plaintiff . this is a civil trial.
That trick worked when everything was on paper. All it takes is a simple keyword search to go through an infinite number of digital documents.
This probably did start out as a mistake, but now it is so obviously a plan by the defense to get a mistrial.
Nope, they did it as bait, hoping the plaintiffs would use it in court and then demand a miss trial because they sent an email back saying "disregard".
Thankfully for us, and the entire world, there are procedures and steps that have to be taken beyond that, which the defendants never bothered doing, or where just to inept to be educated in, regardless, they literally shot themselves in the foot.
Or to totally destroy their client in the "court of public opinion."
@@tomarmstrong4761 That would be cause for disbarment. I seriously doubt he would sacrifice his career to "destroy their client in the court of public opinion".
Jones is probably terrified of the Jan 6 committee and would oppose that to no end. There is no way that would be in the client's best interest.
AT THIS POINT WHO CARES? THE JUDGE DECLARED HIM GUILTY. DO YOU GET IT? DO YOU KNOW HOW THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IS SUPPOSED TO WORK IN AMERICA? ARE YOU AWARE OF WHY THIS IS A PROBLEM?
I see 4 microphones in the image at 1:45, why can't we properly hear what is being sail?
If only all media outlets were held to this standard.
They could be! They're just usually more careful than Jones to avoid defamation, and they don't often completely screw up their legal strategy every step of the way like Jones's team did.
I knew it was going to be something like this. Jones’ lawyer was objecting every step of the way, but when the prosecution revealed that he had received the emails by accident he was completely silent. It was a pretty clumsy attempt at a trap and I’m glad the judge didn’t fall for it but I suspect it’s not the last we’re going to hear about it.
Yeah, you don’t have a good defense, move for a mistrial. And she said he had tried for serval mistrial before, serval times. I do know if it’s joke, but she said it was 17.
Like accidentally texting you sext to the "real" girlfriend.
Yeah, seems all Jones's gang can do is go after a mistrial. He's such a showboat, he hangs himself.
I didn’t quite conclude from this that the leak was intentional as a predicate for a mistrial. Jones’ lawyer was I think simply stunned and didn’t know how to object. The text shared in the court yesterday was not remotely privileged. Also, this attempt at a mistrial was so far fetched that the judge more or less asked if he was joking.
I think you're giving him too much credit. The emails had information he was supposed to already have handed over. It made him look really bad. There's pretty much no way it could help his client. Asking for mistrial was a last ditch effort.
Holly smokes. I could only imagine how the defense council feels being tore up like that for 10 minutes Basically invalidating your whole law career and possibly anything you might’ve learned in law school. Wow.
Hi Eric, I am a medical doctor, and almost everything I learned in Medical schools I had to reject, by coming out of coma or they call to awaken.
That is because most attorneys are idiots, my friend. A few of us are the rare exception.
@@borodel619 for sure. My wife says the same thing about Law School, and that prior life experiences dictated her career path. Either way this courtroom clip was brutal and reminds me of when I try to argue with my her.
Lawyer getting what he deserves for defending this piece of crap
@@brianrizzi6321 As sleazy as his client.
Ty Beard is watching this going "See, See?! There IS a worse lawyer than me!"
This is nothing short of hilarious. It's one of those situations where, despite the attempts by the 'protagonists to adopt the high moral ground, they only succeed in doing the opposite. Like the analogy with the doors. Despite his protestations, every man and his dog is going to know that they only want the doors to remain locked because of what's behind them
I knew they were going to do that. I wouldn't doubt it if releasing the records accidently, wasn't an accident so they could file for a mistrial.
this is the most delusional take on the entire situation.
Yes it could have been a fishing expedition.
If that really would have been the plan, that lawyer should be disbarred. If someone would try that, he would choose a document clearly falling under priviledge.
Right, I think the lawyer right now is just going through the “motions” & making it look like he’s doing the best he can by rolling procedure, but he’s over this case and being associated with these lies, he’d rather be the guy that sent the text and got disbarred and sent Alex jones to jail for his incompetence…he’ll go down in history as the man who lost it all for Alex jones…oh well, the world will say…I’m sure he’s got enough monew and investments and opportunities that this gig can take a backseat
It's sheer incompetence. Nothing more, nothing less.