Видео

interesting how it managed to capture sharp photos despite being a at f/1.7

the best camera in the World is the one in your pocket...

its a 4-6k camera vs a 2k phone samsung does have over sharpening but looks great fora phone

cant see definitely,why not enlarge it？

Let's be real-no one in a real-life situation is going to spend more than 5 seconds analysing that shot, let alone zoom in to check if there’s a nesting bird on the tree. The casual viewer is looking for overall composition, colour, and clarity, not micro-details. That said, I have the 69MP Sony and love it for what it can do, but I have to admit that top smartphones have come a long way. Their computational photography makes them incredibly versatile for day-to-day use, rivalling top level, dedicated cameras in more and more scenarios. It’s truly impressive how much they’ve closed the gap.

Brava Samsung hai retto bene il confronto....grazie

Hardly surprising. Btw, you can just press ctrl-alt-v to copy setting from the previous images.

The main takeaway is ... nothing compares to good glass, optics, and focal length.

What. agreat comparison video, deserves more likes! One thing to note is its hard to recover OVERexposed shots, its best to be underexposed as shadow detail can be recovered but blown out info is missing and hard to recover.

You don't need fancy shit to capture a memory, remember polaroid instant photos?

I have the XT5. Got it mid-2023. Great camera. Amazing performer. Bought the XT1 for fun yesterday and I am astounded at the build quality versus it's much more recent younger brother. The XT1 feels like it was crafted out of love and the XT5 feels pretty cheap. Image quality side by side is as you've illustrated: very little difference until you scale them.

Este Video Merece Toda la atencion de la gente que dice que ... para que comprar una camara si puedes comprar un celular.... quienes amamos el purismo de la imagen entendemos el valor de que al ampliar la foto se vea REAL y organica, y no DIGITAl y falsa como Sucede en los nueos mobiles de "muchisimos megapixeles" gracias por esto!!!

After 7:30 min... I can honestly say I preferred almost all the Samsung pics😅. If you have to zoom in to prove the actual camera had the slight upperhand..nuf said lol

s24 actually does amazingly well considering the crappy little sensor. Quite amazing really. The s24 has been the first phone, where I can view the images on my 4k monitor and not vomit a little in my mouth

Even though the image quality from a phone can't beat one of an expensive camera, the phone company has come far enough that most common users may accecpt the phone quality pictures.

Please please please do the same for XT-5 vs Sony a7 iv 🙏 that's the way we should compare it: downscaled and zoomed in, otherwise it's just a slideshow. many thanks

The eye detection for wildlife n birds, moving figures is naff compared with the Z8... That's the only ball nikon dropped

What is the pro camera app you mentioned in your video? Great video by the way. Keep up the good work.

It's on purpose, those are movie tones. Like put a modern 27in HDR DP1.4 against a 27in non-HDR DP1.4 (10BIT 60FPS) Even with infinite brightness and dark control, the movie is invisible on the HDR monitor. The pixels overlap to multiply the orange of night scenes, as a lot don't use yellow as much as blue. They both are kidding the 700nm infrared.

impressive comparison. I am a Nikon user for many years and I am impressed by what I see from S24 Ultra. Obviously, RAW files lack some fine details in underexposed or overexposed shots but personally, I prefer a tad bit oversharpened results from S24 Ultra over Nikon. It's just my personal preference

When comparing a 2k dollar plus camera to a phone around half that price you better see some performace differences. Make a call with your camera,text, email, internet? Nothing...ok the phone is an infinitely better value in my opinion. No real professional photograpger would use a frickn phone anyway. Lol. Of course you want a dedicated camera for that but the quality of photo mixed with the infinite amount of other stuff it does and again half the price makes it pretty much a no brainer unless again you are professional....but we already know this

Remember that large sensors are only getting faster readout. Pixel quality and resolution has been the same for 15 years. The large camera offers manual control and this is why cameras like Fujifilm sell well, or accessories like timecode input, dual removable memory cards, audio input, matte boxes, follow focus, real time video output for studio use, good external triggering, tethering, flash support, external power, special lenses, etc, and all at the same time. Large cameras can only compete with phones if they belong to these two categories. Manual control, professional setups. All other cameras are doomed, even if they costs one third of the price of a phone with a good camera.

This was great comparison. I just wish you would have done the Low Light testing based on going up 1 stop, then 2 stops, etc. until you reach 5 stops. My other request is can you do a comparrison for the Z6 vs. the Z6II? I have a Z6 and just bought a Z6iii, however, there seems to be a lot of people who have a Z6ii and say that it is much more superior than the Z6, which I'd like to figure out if that is true or not. Wishful thinking. :) Liked and subbed to your channel today. 😁

Is the macro focus any better on the 16 Pro?

2200 euros vs 990 euros

Very good comparison video. As an ex-professional photographer, I`ve just purhased a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. The price has come right down, due to the imminent launch of the S25 Ultra. I looked at the Xiaomi 14 Ultra and the Vivo X200 pro, but the Samsung won. The fact that a smartphone can shoot mult RAW images is amazing! Where can I buy that clip-on filter attachment you mentioned, as I`d like to shoot with a circular polarising filter attached? Cheers.

So great sir, very best testing both... But which one is the best fuji Or ultra..? What's your opinion reply pls..... ......,?

Love yhe comments, no glazers, just people speaking there thoughts on how good it is and also letting us kno2 what could be changed. But remeber, its just a mobile phone.

Canons magenta trees and sky is very realistic.

10:40 oil painting look is pretty much all I get from phones even with raw, maybe they need to be forced to take low ISO. (I suspect they automatically take high ISO especially when in HDR mode). Very interesting thanks.

so this shows how British let the loyal forces to perish. Shame!

Did you use the 200 mega pixels on the s24 ? Makes a big difference

If the phone and camera don't have much difference in quality.I will always use my phone to take pictures.Instead of having to carry a bulky machine.Then have to transfer the photo to another device.

so not bad at all

I own them both and trying to decide which to take to Antarctica? The 28-400 fits better in my bags along with the 24-120 s but I know the 100-400 has better optics, so undecided about the choice?

I hope Z DX owners get 10-24 or 8-16 f/4 with 16-80 f/4 & 70-350 f/4-6.3 from Nikon. But it's almost impossible from Nikon

now put these both on gaming test

I swapped my 200-500 nikkor lens for the smaller lighter 28-400. Yes all the points you made are true. But which lens am I most likely to have on my camera all the time…certainly not the 5 lb 200-500 monstrosity. Thanks for the video. I carry the 28-400 on my camera all the time…my only con is I can’t fit a tele-extender to it.

Phone cannot compare with DSLR even Dslr MP is 24 is far better.

Best comparison so far.

now, please compare it to vivo x100 ultra on 3.2x zoom

I love it❤

Thank you so much for taking the time to do this analysis and review! Just what I was looking for. A great job!

Weird question but maybe it’s perfect here…I recently got a Nikon Zf and I'm looking to aquire a second backup body, that's affordable and takes my Z mount lenses. Honestly, I’m leaning towards the Nikon Z5, but with the recent price drops the Z6ii is not much more and is appealing also. Nearly everyone I've spoken to who actually owns a Z6ii (or Z5), LOVES it. I love my Zf, but I want something that will act as a more ergonomic and compact backup, with similar menus. I shoot portraits and headshots and an occasional family session or engagement. No events, sports or wildlife. I don't need speed, and I don’t plan on doing video with this backup. I played with a Z5 and a Z6ii in the camera store recently and they both felt really nimble and great to use. In use, I couldn’t really tell much difference between the Z5 and Z6ii. Both really nice. Would you recommend the Z5 or Z6ii as a backup to my Zf? If I get the Z5 I can afford more glass, but maybe the better body is a wiser choice?

Those are some pretty nice photos for something coming off a cell phone...

If phone camera is compared to someone who doesn't know how to use the full size rig, the phone wins. 75% of viewers seldom use devices larger than tablets to view shared images/video. The amount of effort to carry a full body rig around vs the phone in your pocket is 1 BIG reason full size camera sales are falling. I generally combine adventures and when our photos are captured, which makes full size impossible. If you know how to use the camera phone as you have shown. The phone wins. . . at a fraction of the cost. Pixel peepers will always chose full size but that isn't a fair comparison. Thank you

Well done comparison video

congratulations very interesting video..maybe I'll look for an 850

how big is sensor and lens in samsung ?

VİVO X200 PRO BEST PHONE CAMERA AMAZİNG CAMERA