2025 RAM 1500 | MotorWeek Road Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
  • For many years, the Dodge Ram was the also-ran in the full-size pickup truck race. And because of that, what is now known as just Ram has never been afraid to try new things, whether it’s big-rig style, unique suspension designs, innovative Ram Box storage, or delivering luxury car-like interiors, so what’s next? Well, let’s find out. #RAM #RAM1500 #RAMTrucks
    READ THE TRANSCRIPT HERE: motorweek.org/...
    See more of our Road Tests on our website: motorweek.org/...
    Find airdates on your local PBS station HERE: motorweek.org/...
    Want to watch full episodes of MotorWeek? Download the PBS app for FREE or watch here: www.pbs.org/sh...
    Stay connected with MotorWeek on social media!
    Twitter (X): / motorweek
    Facebook: / motorweektv
    Instagram: / motorweek
    MotorWeek, PBS' award-winning weekly automotive magazine provides unbiased, consumer-oriented car news with feature stories on related topics.
    To license this video or any content from MotorWeek, please visit:
    www.parsintl.c...

Комментарии • 532

  • @SharpArmamentCompany
    @SharpArmamentCompany 5 месяцев назад +79

    5.7 HEMI for life

    • @jlcii
      @jlcii 4 месяца назад +5

      ...... So for the next 5 years until the engine implodes?

    • @davidestrada7337
      @davidestrada7337 4 месяца назад +1

      @@jlcii lol

    • @RockymountainRobert
      @RockymountainRobert 4 месяца назад

      6.4

    • @WZD10016
      @WZD10016 3 месяца назад

      Perfect pickup: Ram with Cyber truck powertrain. I’m confident there’s a market.

  • @iibise.3827
    @iibise.3827 5 месяцев назад +236

    I’m ok with them offering a 6 cylinder turbo but I’m not ok with them taking away a V8 option altogether

    • @bikdav
      @bikdav 5 месяцев назад +24

      Agreed. That was a big mistake on the part of Stellantis.

    • @daison96
      @daison96 5 месяцев назад +34

      They're practically forced to do this due to the mass push to lower emissions. Dodge/Stellantis made so many V8s in recent years, that they were not able to acquire enough emission credits, and ended up paying Tesla millions for theirs.

    • @teehud313
      @teehud313 5 месяцев назад

      Agreed

    • @cliffsimms8520
      @cliffsimms8520 5 месяцев назад +7

      Stellantis fail.. intentional possibly

    • @RabbiJesus
      @RabbiJesus 5 месяцев назад +4

      Let’s see how they hold up after 100 and 200k.

  • @elcheapo5302
    @elcheapo5302 5 месяцев назад +65

    As a lifelong Mopar customer with three currently in my driveway, I have no use for $90,000 pickups, turbos, hybrids, or EVs. Its nice, but it isn't *that* nice. Good luck, "Stellantis".

    • @iuyozx
      @iuyozx 5 месяцев назад +3

      Nobody cares

    • @phatgringo2.0
      @phatgringo2.0 4 месяца назад +4

      Lifelong Chrysler fan and you're admitting it out loud? 😂

    • @FJB2020
      @FJB2020 4 месяца назад +10

      90k for a 50k truck is bullshit...

    • @dennisl6198
      @dennisl6198 3 месяца назад +1

      You do understand that burning fossil fuel is unsustainable, bad for the country, and hurts us geopolitically, right? No, that had not occurred to you.

    • @FJB2020
      @FJB2020 3 месяца назад +9

      @@dennisl6198 You do realize that mining for the raw materials for "green" energy is unsustainable, bad for the country and hurst us geopolitically, right??

  • @vikram2708
    @vikram2708 5 месяцев назад +70

    Gone are the working man's trucks...❤

    • @epa316
      @epa316 5 месяцев назад +3

      You can get a new single cab F-150 from Ford for $36,700

    • @domjfante8140
      @domjfante8140 5 месяцев назад +6

      ⁠​⁠@@epa316That’s a down payment on a house in most places, who the hell wants to pay that for a base model truck?

    • @epa316
      @epa316 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@domjfante8140Beats $80k for a loaded one. Or you could roll the dice on a used truck, except they’re not much cheaper anymore.

    • @fireant1272
      @fireant1272 5 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@epa316😂who would pay that for a ford. Itll be a yard ornament in 3 years with trees growing through it.

    • @epa316
      @epa316 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@fireant1272 I sense a butthurt gm or dodge fangirl 😝

  • @steveelliott742
    @steveelliott742 5 месяцев назад +124

    Turbocharged engines are another added repair expense. Naturally aspirated engines are the only way to go when it comes to reliability.

    • @2002honda954
      @2002honda954 5 месяцев назад +8

      And a thing of the past. Better get used to TCing and hybrid. Future is here.

    • @mrjim1973
      @mrjim1973 5 месяцев назад +11

      Amen! Overpriced, over engineered! That's the story across the entire market today. I never thought there would be NOTHING new I would want nor afford, but here we are. Happy to own & drive a 2008 Crown Vic & 2013 F150, Both Naturally aspirated, affordable & easy to maintain. I have officially moved back into the used car market where I started as a teenager in the 80s!

    • @ottovonbismarck7094
      @ottovonbismarck7094 5 месяцев назад +17

      How do turbo diesels last for decades then? I thought turbo charging makes reliability worse

    • @patmanz28
      @patmanz28 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@2002honda954the future the government is cramming down our throats. The ho 6 uses more fuel than the hemi...

    • @777jones
      @777jones 5 месяцев назад +9

      Cummins has done fine with a turbo for 30 years plus.

  • @ohguy1991
    @ohguy1991 5 месяцев назад +112

    I never would have believed I'd see 90,000 dollar trucks in my lifetime. No way I'd pay that for any car or truck let alone a Dodge product

    • @stevemcgowen
      @stevemcgowen 5 месяцев назад +8

      Pen-s extenders cost $...

    • @austinfrazier7325
      @austinfrazier7325 5 месяцев назад +8

      100K probably in 5 years at this rate

    • @skipgumphrey9579
      @skipgumphrey9579 5 месяцев назад +8

      There’s trucks already north of 100K now lol 😂

    • @MR.TOYBOX
      @MR.TOYBOX 5 месяцев назад +7

      Facts. Paid 50k for 2019 in 2019 for a bad ass limited 1500 with all the options! Paid 50k. That is whats it worth not a dime more.

    • @tralfazsteamboat5695
      @tralfazsteamboat5695 5 месяцев назад +9

      They can’t sell trucks with $16k off the sticker now. Who’s going to spend $90k?

  • @Fleetwoodjohn
    @Fleetwoodjohn 5 месяцев назад +75

    Saturday mornings with a Motorweek review never gets old 😎

  • @EricFortuneJr.
    @EricFortuneJr. 5 месяцев назад +80

    $42k for a base V6 isn’t bad.
    Said no one..

    • @brianklamer3328
      @brianklamer3328 5 месяцев назад +10

      If you want to spend 42K for the worst brand of American made truck on the market.

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 5 месяцев назад

      inline 6, not a v6

    • @EricFortuneJr.
      @EricFortuneJr. 5 месяцев назад +4

      @@digitaldoc100 V6 in base trim..

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@EricFortuneJr. Did not know that the 3.6 pentastar V-6 carried over to this. Pity, should be all inline 6 as the pentastar is older and hardly anything exciting.

    • @EricFortuneJr.
      @EricFortuneJr. 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@digitaldoc100 Agree, an NA in line 6 would last forever in a base truck.

  • @theforgottenorg
    @theforgottenorg 5 месяцев назад +24

    So much time spent going over the details of the top trim. The manufacturers lead and most journalists follow. Motor Week of all journalists should go back to their roots.

    • @mbox314
      @mbox314 5 месяцев назад +6

      If they were objective they wouldn't get free cars to review

  • @MS3DALE
    @MS3DALE 5 месяцев назад +46

    $90k for a half-ton truck?!? 😮

    • @bfula9900
      @bfula9900 5 месяцев назад +2

      You could also pay 40k. Choice is nice

    • @MS3DALE
      @MS3DALE 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@bfula9900 Not many "choices" out there for $40k, lol

    • @PeterRabbitWhatsup
      @PeterRabbitWhatsup 4 месяца назад +2

      Don't you want that " powered tailgate" ? 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @frankcoffey
      @frankcoffey 4 месяца назад

      Where you been? Some of these things are about the same price as the HD ones now or more expensive! Been that way for a long time. Hell, Ford stopped making cars because they were driving down the ticket average. 🤣

  • @rj9617
    @rj9617 5 месяцев назад +9

    Hopefully the V6 is still an option. John Davis is MotorWeek. The OG in automotive journalism.

    • @waterloo123100
      @waterloo123100 5 месяцев назад +3

      Only with a hybrid from what I understand

    • @CJL36
      @CJL36 5 месяцев назад +3

      The 3.6 is alive and well. My 2025 is currently in production. It’s a “mild hybrid”.

    • @ottovonbismarck7094
      @ottovonbismarck7094 5 месяцев назад +7

      3.6 is more reliable than the hemi of old, dont worry about that

  • @Bryan_Jake
    @Bryan_Jake Месяц назад +4

    Stellantis diggin its grave well

  • @maybelive765
    @maybelive765 5 месяцев назад +5

    Guys, they had to take out the hemi, otherwise there'd be competition between the V8 and the hurricane. Remember, the 5.7 hemi was originally a 2500-class engine that just so happens to have amazing packaging dimensions.
    If its anything like the coyote/ecoboost problem, this is actually a blessing in disguise. we're gonna have a next-gen hemi sooner rather than later.

    • @smokestack9033
      @smokestack9033 День назад

      I'm taking a screen capture of your hilarious comment. You'd better pray they bring back the V8 if "Stellantis" doesn't dig themselves a grave with all this electric, v6 hoopla, that could bankrupt the company.

    • @maybelive765
      @maybelive765 День назад

      @@smokestack9033 I 100% agree with you. Alas, Dodge doesn't have the deep federal pockets that Ford has to allow cannibalistic competition between their V8 and twin turbo platforms.
      I have a friend in Canada who wants to re-license the Hemi to build a national Hemi engine. That could be a possible successor if dodge eventually dies.

  • @tralfazsteamboat5695
    @tralfazsteamboat5695 5 месяцев назад +12

    A 520 hp V6 isn’t going to be reliable.

  • @an_easy_name_to_remember4749
    @an_easy_name_to_remember4749 5 месяцев назад +27

    Sounds like a new “Hurricane tick” under the hood…🫣

    • @taurussho86
      @taurussho86 5 месяцев назад +2

      😂 I wouldn't be surprised

    • @southern842
      @southern842 5 месяцев назад

      No different than the ecoboost

    • @taurussho86
      @taurussho86 5 месяцев назад

      @@southern842 ecoboosts do not sound like that

    • @southern842
      @southern842 5 месяцев назад

      @@taurussho86 It's literally called the ecoboost tick. All direct injections tick.

    • @taurussho86
      @taurussho86 5 месяцев назад

      @@southern842 and like I said, ecoboosts doesn't sound like that

  • @755hp
    @755hp 5 месяцев назад +27

    People don’t make enough for the Tungsten….or any of these models to begin with.

    • @iuyozx
      @iuyozx 5 месяцев назад +2

      I beg to differ. I see plenty of top trim trucks down here. They wouldn’t offer them if people didn’t buy them.

    • @carboydorifutoparty3976
      @carboydorifutoparty3976 5 месяцев назад +1

      I'll be very honest, I always see top trim trucks and suv's rolling about the moment I hear them annouce/sell them. They Def aren't gonna be bought by fans and most likely will be bought by those who just use their cars to carry their kids and get groceries tho.

    • @fireant1272
      @fireant1272 5 месяцев назад +4

      Americans love having the most expensive everything... just so you know if you invest you to can have alot of money..

    • @PeteyPablo2770
      @PeteyPablo2770 5 месяцев назад +3

      sure they do... otherwise the market wouldn't have shifted this way... you guys just need to face reality of the changing market.

    • @Dan-gj1hz
      @Dan-gj1hz 5 месяцев назад

      Banks are looking at making 10 year loans more common

  • @zrxcat
    @zrxcat 5 месяцев назад +4

    I read it right from Chrysler when the hurricane was announced they stated that this new motor unlike the hemi will not run on anything lower than 92 octane and if you put 87 into it you will not be producing the rated horse power or mpg as you would get by running high octane. I just bought a new ram and my dealer said exactly that . New jeep wagoneer owners are not to happy that they have the hurricane now because some have tried 87 octane and they called the dealer because nobody told them 😂

    • @KarlWagner-ql2by
      @KarlWagner-ql2by 4 месяца назад +1

      cozt of high test n vo eest to high country u no find high test . vu k reg used to ve 101

    • @zrxcat
      @zrxcat 3 месяца назад

      I bought a 2024 ram 1500 with the old V6 because I don't tow or haul much at all and this newer version of old faithful is getting me no less than 18 mpg around town and I hauled 900 pounds of stone and averages were above 19.7 to 20.1 mpg I pretty happy

  • @DirkDiggler6903
    @DirkDiggler6903 4 месяца назад +4

    Motor Week in full is bs. Replace the Hemi for a six and you're ok with that? You taking money under the table?

  • @Butchcub75
    @Butchcub75 5 месяцев назад +5

    Not exactly what I call a road test. No track test.

    • @JavaLength
      @JavaLength 4 месяца назад

      This RT was shot off site, outside of Austin, TX. No access to their home test track.

  • @jorgerodrigogomezflores5711
    @jorgerodrigogomezflores5711 5 месяцев назад +10

    I wonder they they didn’t replaced the 3.6L V6 with a naturally aspirated variant of their 3.0L I6.
    GM’s investment in keeping the V8 under their trucks hoods will pay big time in the long run.

  • @755hp
    @755hp 5 месяцев назад +4

    I can’t wait for an aftermarket exhaust on these engines!

  • @juanrivas494
    @juanrivas494 5 месяцев назад +6

    No Hemi V8? I’ll pass!

  • @davidaubin3902
    @davidaubin3902 5 месяцев назад +5

    1:03 John: Where you used to see hemi, get ready to say hurricane! LOL

  • @mrjim1973
    @mrjim1973 5 месяцев назад +10

    The story today is awesome Carriage & Chassis, Horribly Over engineered & volatile drive trains! I don't want a turbo anything! There is NO replacement for displacement! Keep is simple stupid some say. Dodge didn't really get the Hemi all that right either. The Multi Displacement or Active Fuel Management system causes many issues. The best Hemi was offered less that system available only in a manual transmission version of the Challenger or Charger. Those are the ones to own. But then again, if one needed a truck where does that leave us? Can we get back to basics? I don't really need to be driving a turbo charged personal computer. We have nothing for an entry level consumer anymore. Thanks for your coverage & posts all these years. Godspeed.

  • @streetcat957
    @streetcat957 5 месяцев назад +10

    Straight sixes make huge turgue. My dad had the f150 300ci Straight 6

  • @windwalker121
    @windwalker121 5 месяцев назад +7

    These high-output turbo engines are gonna be toast at 100K miles.

    • @Slow.S55
      @Slow.S55 5 месяцев назад

      Maybe but they did make good 4 cylinder turbocharged engines in the past

    • @waterloo123100
      @waterloo123100 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@Slow.S55500 hp out of a 3.0 engine is not gonna be reliable in the long run. Way to complicated then a v8

    • @Slow.S55
      @Slow.S55 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@waterloo123100 I have a feeling the engine block will be fine, the issues I do see happening are more likely to be turbo failures and drivetrain issues, such as the possibility of front axles, front differential, possibly transmission as I don’t know if they beefed it up such as the rear end of these.

  • @shawn2296
    @shawn2296 3 месяца назад

    My childhood all over again
    Im grateful for RUclips and this channel

  • @adamyahya4638
    @adamyahya4638 2 месяца назад

    John Davis is an absolute LEGEND

  • @davidpate6095
    @davidpate6095 5 месяцев назад +10

    Love that they went with an inline 6.

  • @HereForAStorm
    @HereForAStorm 5 месяцев назад +13

    Keep in mind that all of these vehicle reviews are being paid to tell us why "we shouldn't be mad" that there are no longer naturally aspirated versions of anything... and they never, ever mention reliability beyond the warranty.

    • @mbox314
      @mbox314 5 месяцев назад +1

      This was straight up salesmanship and telling viewers they shouldnt be mad really pulled open the curtains on that fact.

    • @lb7144
      @lb7144 5 месяцев назад +3

      We went through something similar during the late 70s and early 80s. Most 5.7 to 6.2 liter V8s were putting out 150 to 170 hp.
      We were spoiled by the recent V8 horsepower wars. Technology will catch up again and V8s will return. These new turbos aren’t of the engineering of the 80s. Let’s see what happens.
      Anywho, still plenty of 2024 and older Rams to purchase. You could also shop Ford or Chevy for V8 options. It’ll all work out.

  • @geoffws6
    @geoffws6 4 месяца назад +2

    Sounds fantastic. Like the lifters are already chattering. 90 for that?? kudos tho for the Rush Red Barchetta.

  • @ChiefRickyRC
    @ChiefRickyRC 5 месяцев назад +5

    Seems fine, but bring back the 4.7HO Dakota

    • @waterloo123100
      @waterloo123100 5 месяцев назад +1

      Never gonna happen at this rate

    • @destructoidx99
      @destructoidx99 5 месяцев назад +1

      lmao 4.7 what year is it 2003?

  • @danr4197
    @danr4197 5 месяцев назад +3

    Looks awesome. Why didn't you test it on the track though? Wanted to see what the inline 6 does which I would take over any other engine in a truck for sure!

  • @matthewottaway8521
    @matthewottaway8521 2 месяца назад

    The Tungsten is too cool to be a Ram. It's fit to be a luxury suv in one sense.

  • @TC-ok4ng
    @TC-ok4ng 2 месяца назад +1

    Ram 3.6 e torque with 305 hp is all ya need ,unless you are heavy towing , and thats a fact.

  • @lb7144
    @lb7144 5 месяцев назад +13

    My 2016 Limited was great with the Hemi. I ended up with a 2024 Limited this year with the Hemi e-torque. Leaps and bounds ahead of my 2016. Didn’t have any trouble out of my Gen IV Ram and it held its value.
    The new straight 6 engines are technical marvels. My dad had a few slant 6s when we were kids. Looking forward to see how the new truck workout.

    • @e.t.cetera7035
      @e.t.cetera7035 5 месяцев назад

      How's the fuel economy sir?

    • @lb7144
      @lb7144 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@e.t.cetera7035
      Hello
      So far the combined fuel economy has been 18 mpg on the 2024. Was sitting around 19-20mpg highway. My 2016 brand new was as good starting out. But my 2016 had the higher ratio rear end so it had more grunt off the line. The 2024 has the lower ratio so it gets better gas mileage. I expect it will do better and it has the 5 additional gallons of gas (31 gallons)

  • @alfonsom8286
    @alfonsom8286 5 месяцев назад +2

    The 2025 Ram 1500 is guaranteed.....to pile up on dealer lots.

  • @0159ralph
    @0159ralph Месяц назад

    I'm happy with my 2019 Laramie Hemi. It has only 45k on the odometer and its paid off. Best truck going...

  • @markallen2984
    @markallen2984 5 месяцев назад +6

    I’m not a truck guy, but the RAM looks very 🆒 cool

    • @sammyday3341
      @sammyday3341 4 месяца назад

      And they have a great ride quality.

  • @ddellwo
    @ddellwo 5 месяцев назад +6

    Who the hell drops $90k on a truck? Please let us know so we can get them the mental help they so desperately need…….😮

  • @torres3800
    @torres3800 5 месяцев назад +2

    Interesting engine choice from Stalantis. Wonder how a 3.0 liter twin turbocharged 6 will fare in the long run? Specially with emission restrictions and 500+hp. People should wait to buy and see if they figure out the kinks as time goes by. It sounds insane to squeeze that much power out of a small production motor.

  • @gilhernandez605
    @gilhernandez605 5 месяцев назад +5

    I'm not impressed with the new engine choices, thankfully I'm out of the truck buying market and I'm satisfied with my 2015 HEMI. Good luck to all you new RAM buyers.

  • @spinedoc893
    @spinedoc893 2 месяца назад

    I have had a few Ram 1500 Hemi's and currently have a 2022. The GM at my local Ram dealer is a buddy and he lent me a Hurricane Ram 1500 Rebel for a day when I took mine in for oil change last week. I must admit it is a very nice engine to drive. Very smooth and very quiet which is great on the highway but it sounds bad when you start it up. Its powerful but I wouldn't say I noticed it being more powerful than my Hemi (Mine has after market high flow air filter and MBRP muffler replacement that might add a few HP but otherwise stock). I drove it a few hundred km on a loop i drive weekly and it used more fuel than my mine. In fairness its new and its was a Rebel with higher ground clearance and off road tires. So lets assume mileage is roughly equal. Perhaps the turbo has better emissions but it can't be that much different if you burn a gallon of fuel you burn a gallon of fuel. To me I'd stick with the Hemi at the very least until the is more durability info. The hurricane cost more, roughly same power and mileage and sounds awful and reliability and cost of repairs are uncertain as of yet so I'll buy a 2024 Hemi and drive it for many years. My last Hemi prior to my 2022 went 300K with no issues at all aside from exhaust manifold studs. Time will tell how these hurricanes fair.

  • @bawintermage8351
    @bawintermage8351 5 месяцев назад +1

    Motorweek gives clear, concise reviews that we can use. Only wish they could lower prices

    • @MartinGalway
      @MartinGalway 5 месяцев назад

      please tell us what Motorweek said about fuel consumption in their "review that we can use"

  • @vinmangob8555
    @vinmangob8555 5 месяцев назад +2

    Big mistake getting rid of the Hemi. These Turbos will break way more, I am guessing like the ford eco boost. They even use more fuel.

    • @Bill-sp8kb
      @Bill-sp8kb 2 месяца назад

      Not gonna get these power and torque numbers, from three liters, without burning a lot of fuel. As far as reliability goes, only time will tell. 🍻

  • @mr.boostang2064
    @mr.boostang2064 5 месяцев назад +6

    Damn, more power than the srt10 Ram

  • @vr4787
    @vr4787 5 месяцев назад

    Makes me want to hold onto my Ram 1500 Classic Tradesman Hemi for as long as possible. Simple enough to mod and maintain, enough power for what I need the truck to do, gets 16-18 mpg city, 23-25 mpg hwy and was able to pay it off early when they were going for $32k new.

  • @blacksitearea
    @blacksitearea 5 месяцев назад +8

    The front bumper resembles me a frontend of some cars from kia motors.

  • @davidparkin9017
    @davidparkin9017 4 месяца назад +5

    In line 6 cylinder engines are the best type of layout, smoothness, ease of maintenance, room to work, simpler design. I am not necessarily saying this one though. I would have gone with a larger displacement, about 4.0 or 4.5 litres, high compression like 12.0 : 1 even if it achieved 350 horsepower and 300 pounds feet of torque. More reliable, longer lasting and as everyone knows, once those turbos start spinning, there goes your fuel economy. Bragging be damned.

  • @lindseyyah1
    @lindseyyah1 4 месяца назад +1

    The Hurricane twin-turbo is plagued with problems... good luck to the buyers 😢😢😢

    • @ohioguy4326
      @ohioguy4326 3 месяца назад

      Please be more specific, What problems?

  • @alp3781
    @alp3781 2 месяца назад

    540 is a lot of power, man. I hope these Turbos will be well cooled. Time will tell.

  • @keewatin427
    @keewatin427 5 месяцев назад

    Not ever buying a non V8 pick up, ever. But that Tungsten interior is amazing

  • @Legendary-2024
    @Legendary-2024 5 месяцев назад

    cant wait for the 0-60 and 1/4 mile runs with this high output version!! almost 550hp is no sneeze!

  • @bradleymeyer9775
    @bradleymeyer9775 5 месяцев назад +2

    If it were my money, I’d I can afford it, I’d get that twin turbo high output engine, since the Hemi is no longer offer. Like my uncle, I prefer a V8 in a 1/2 ton truck. He has a 2018 Ram 1500 Limited Hemi 4x4.

  • @maverick-zj3jz
    @maverick-zj3jz 5 месяцев назад +2

    Only 120k what a bargain.

  • @badhonky6473
    @badhonky6473 5 месяцев назад +4

    Get mad at the government not the manufacturers

    • @fit4ya1975
      @fit4ya1975 4 месяца назад

      Yep, meanwhile the million and billionaires get to enjoy their yachts and private jets, meanwhile we have to put DEF in a Diesel, drive a 6Cyl truck, and god forbid if a cow farts.

  • @LandonMillertotheMaxx
    @LandonMillertotheMaxx 5 месяцев назад +11

    stellantis, why? 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

    • @bikdav
      @bikdav 5 месяцев назад +3

      Because, they act as though they don’t know anything about American Pickups.

    • @LandonMillertotheMaxx
      @LandonMillertotheMaxx 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@bikdav i understand, i know they want better fuel economy.

    • @843MudMafia.
      @843MudMafia. 5 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@LandonMillertotheMaxx it more to it than that the epa credits and plus the hemi is not a clean engine

    • @LandonMillertotheMaxx
      @LandonMillertotheMaxx 5 месяцев назад

      @@843MudMafia. you sure about that?

    • @843MudMafia.
      @843MudMafia. 5 месяцев назад +2

      @LandonMillertotheMaxx yea when u got to buy epa credits and plus they had alot time to upgrade the hemi but the inline6 is clear engine

  • @MegaRetr
    @MegaRetr 5 месяцев назад

    Wow actually I can’t wait for an aftermarket exhaust on these engines 🎉🎉🎉

  • @classiccorvettesmusclecars5846
    @classiccorvettesmusclecars5846 5 месяцев назад +2

    Twin turbo V6s…. when u just don’t want the longevity of a V8…..

  • @Itsmelmc
    @Itsmelmc 5 месяцев назад

    Bought a new vehicle in 2020 and have a 2.9apr. Happy to live in those days in these prices

  • @TheCarCrazyGuy
    @TheCarCrazyGuy 5 месяцев назад +5

    These unproven 6 cylinder engines will most likely prove to be an unreliable mill.

  • @goaztecs7549
    @goaztecs7549 Месяц назад

    Where is this truck made? Thanks for the review!

  • @ricodog3652
    @ricodog3652 28 дней назад

    I love my Ram. Sucks that my 2023 will be the last one I ever own.

  • @wny9521
    @wny9521 5 месяцев назад +1

    Really nice Truck. I wish they would put this much effort into a Chrysler branded product! I can't afford anything over 35l. Do you remember when Chrysler came out with cool designs attainable if you had a decent job. I like that the Ramcharger name is making a comeback.

  • @andrewhixson2235
    @andrewhixson2235 Месяц назад

    I would be interested in the Tungsten Trim level. But it's the only trim level without the 6.4 bed length. For me, that's a must. Also, the upcoming hybrid version. I would also be interested in that. But it is basically an electric truck, and the motor is a range extender. What I would be interested in, is if they did do a hybrid like the Toyota Tundra. A mechanical drive train is assisted by an electric motor. I would get the HO hurricane hybrid.

  • @sauerOFkraut
    @sauerOFkraut 5 месяцев назад +1

    they should have called it the slant six

  • @T.Webster-h5b
    @T.Webster-h5b 4 месяца назад

    Best looking and riding trucks on the road . Had mine for 21 years and will never speak bad of Rams . However I just bought the Nissan Titan after 6 months of reading and test driving . Not paying 70,000 or more dollars for a truck .

  • @dadgarage7966
    @dadgarage7966 4 месяца назад +1

    I can't buy a Ram. I don't have a goatee.

  • @johnnymason2460
    @johnnymason2460 4 месяца назад +1

    They could have gotten the same or better numbers with two smaller displacement turbo Hemi V8s. A full-size truck or SUV should always have at least one V8 engine. Otherwise, it's not worth it to get one.

  • @bradleymeyer9775
    @bradleymeyer9775 25 дней назад

    I’d probably get a BigHorn or Laramie trim something nicer than a work truck but I don’t need the luxury model. Like my F150 XLT, it has a lot of options but it’s not fully loaded.

  • @konbini_Goblin
    @konbini_Goblin 5 месяцев назад +2

    Johnathan Davis is a blessing to us all

  • @kevinbarry71
    @kevinbarry71 5 месяцев назад +3

    Maybe Ram should try something revolutionary for them; make their trucks reliable. Of course they have no idea how to do that.

    • @domjfante8140
      @domjfante8140 5 месяцев назад +3

      Nor do they have any reason to, because they know Mopar loyalists don’t actually care about reliability.

    • @fireant1272
      @fireant1272 5 месяцев назад +2

      My 2010 ram 1500 has 238k no issues most reliable truck I've had but ive only ever had fords and those aren't reliable at all. My last ford f150 started having major engine issues at 60k😂

    • @waterloo123100
      @waterloo123100 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@domjfante8140 guarantee my 318 outlives your Toyota 😂

    • @fireant1272
      @fireant1272 5 месяцев назад

      @@waterloo123100 even a pentastar will outlive a toyota and be able to tow and haul and get 25mpg.

  • @tbok75
    @tbok75 5 месяцев назад +6

    its called change... nothing you can do about it. Its turbo or nothing. LOL

    • @waterloo123100
      @waterloo123100 5 месяцев назад +3

      Except there’s literally no benefit to this change 👎

  • @s13drift7
    @s13drift7 5 месяцев назад +1

    thought I was watching Yellowstone for a second there

  • @jmyers6175
    @jmyers6175 4 месяца назад +1

    Drive around in a car, says Ram 💩 before it was Dodge 😂. Chrysler marketing 💩

  • @christophertyacke6019
    @christophertyacke6019 5 месяцев назад +2

    Conundrum, house or truck.

  • @BarcelonaBlitzer
    @BarcelonaBlitzer 5 месяцев назад +2

    They should’ve made the I6 port injected. Heavy truck, high pressure DI and 2 turbos boosting those lines/gaskets? Truck will have a heart attack early in life. 😢

  • @Richard57353
    @Richard57353 5 месяцев назад

    “ As little as 42k for a tradesmen” 😂😂😂

  • @ottovonbismarck7094
    @ottovonbismarck7094 5 месяцев назад +2

    I enjoy this new engine, I6 are cool, one turbo feeds 3 cylinders, 500 CCs per cylinder im optimistic

  • @matthewottaway8521
    @matthewottaway8521 2 месяца назад

    The newest Ram 1500 sounds like a decent truck, although it might be a little China-styled in my way of thinking. It also needs a V8 to be an original Ram.

  • @lilpeppa117G
    @lilpeppa117G 4 месяца назад

    Love this channel they need to add an offroad course and person to be competitive

  • @dbriggs1689
    @dbriggs1689 Месяц назад

    New truck prices are outright absurd.

  • @SirtubalotTX
    @SirtubalotTX 5 месяцев назад +1

    No 0-60. Cmon MotorWeek.

    • @danger7dan
      @danger7dan 5 месяцев назад

      It’s the only reason I clicked on the video.

    • @bfula9900
      @bfula9900 5 месяцев назад

      A couple have been done. HO will be in the low 4s

    • @SirtubalotTX
      @SirtubalotTX 5 месяцев назад

      @@bfula9900 I doubt that. After seeing times for the Grand Wagoneer.
      5s.

    • @bfula9900
      @bfula9900 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@SirtubalotTX Well, one of the guys on RUclips ripped off a 4.7 electronically timed just goofing. it also has 30 more hp and about 800lb less than a Wagoneer. Also, RAM just posted times for the RHO at 4.6 and 13.1 for the quarter with more weight and larger tires

    • @SirtubalotTX
      @SirtubalotTX 5 месяцев назад

      @@bfula9900 I'll take a look.

  • @TheRasta4ri
    @TheRasta4ri 5 месяцев назад +1

    Damn i hate that i like it already got some outfitter ideas

  • @stegomon
    @stegomon 5 месяцев назад +2

    Lost me at fiat years ago

  • @weegeemike
    @weegeemike 5 месяцев назад +2

    Sweet, beautful truck. The update was evolutionary but was done gracefully. No HEMI and no V8 AT ALL takes me out of the market for this RAM. Im old school. My dad taught me that if it didnt have a v8, its not a real truck. Ive always gone by that advice and ive never been burned by it.

  • @Quantumflame137
    @Quantumflame137 3 месяца назад

    Cool vid but the quality does not give this vehicle justice

  • @MartinGalway
    @MartinGalway 5 месяцев назад

    "EPA: 15 City, 20 Highway, 17 Combined" since Motorweek didn't mention it in this "road test." Or that the fuel tank is 23 gallons... so you are reminded every 300 miles about the terrible gas consumption. Typical fill up is $62... every 300 miles. (Unless you have zero payload in the truck and are driving it like it's on an EPA test, in which case you will get a bit further)

  • @ArnoldsDesign
    @ArnoldsDesign 3 месяца назад

    I almost guarantee that you won't see a tradeseman available on any dealer lot. At least not enough to consider it widely available to those who want them. Most will be forced to buy the bloated high priced models with glitchy fiat electronics. I had a 2014 5.7 hemi tradesman. It was basic but had great towing power. I don't need a home theater system/luxury condo on wheels for 90k. This is utter madness. I could buy a Lexus GX550 with top trim level for less! And don't expect a tiny 3L I6 to have a long life whilst pushing that kind of power. Toyota's finding that out right now. Semi truck engine makers learned the inverse relationship between hp and longevity decades ago.

  • @tipsovr2626
    @tipsovr2626 5 месяцев назад +1

    There is no way in hell I'm buying a new truck with these idiotic prices. I can do a lot of maintenance and upkeep, when needed, on my truck for much, much less than the cost of a new truck payment.

  • @kenblew2625
    @kenblew2625 Месяц назад

    Since 1979, Loyal Dodge/Ram/Jeep customer, but now Stellantis won't even get a chance to sell me anything. Took my 2017 Ram 2500 (lifetime Maxcare warranty) in for transmission issues in late July 2024, yep, need to replace the transmission. Today 8/21/2024 (nearly a month later) I got notice of ETA 10/4/24 for the new transmission. 394 transmissions on back-order, I'm number VOR 31 on the list. How can Ram/Stellantis think this is acceptable?

  • @tomthackston1442
    @tomthackston1442 2 месяца назад

    So what's tungsten about it?

  • @Lilboncamino
    @Lilboncamino 5 месяцев назад

    This is my future truck right here
    But I would love to see and own srt and TRX trim package of this town

  • @bw7240
    @bw7240 3 месяца назад

    Most ya'll are tripp'n, here in Minnie you can get a 25 1500 Q cab 6-4 box Night edition Hurr 6 anywhere for $49k out the door? almost the same as my 23 Hemi. feel free to drive on past if its not your cup o tea.

  • @NHRA_FREAK
    @NHRA_FREAK Месяц назад

    Now, they laid off 2400 workers. Ending production of the classic ram.

  • @ChevySS1968
    @ChevySS1968 4 месяца назад +3

    hahahah, almost $100k for a 6 cyl truck.

    • @ohioguy4326
      @ohioguy4326 13 дней назад

      yea inline 6 is better then a V8

  • @tonymarino1730
    @tonymarino1730 4 месяца назад

    I owned 3 hemi engines all of them had lifter problems at under 60k miles. I do a lot of city slow driving. So in my opinion the hemi is a bad choice. But I currently own a 6.4 challenger hemi I hardly drive it though.

  • @FreeRangeLemon
    @FreeRangeLemon 5 месяцев назад +7

    Eyyy first on a Motorweek video. Epic. Love you John Davis.

    • @mrjim1973
      @mrjim1973 5 месяцев назад +3

      Legendary Automotive Journalist!

  • @valerianportus7409
    @valerianportus7409 4 месяца назад +1

    Never going to buy a truck that's not a V8. Never.

  • @erahelp
    @erahelp 5 месяцев назад +2

    massive failure coming for this engine. very expensive mistake. ram wont make it long with this displacement. they will have to go back to v8 or shutter