Still A BEAST For Star Citizen in 2024!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- How does the 1080Ti perform in Star Citizen? The answer? Pretty well at 1080p and 1440p! I've compared it to a 4080, 3080, 4060, 6700XT, 3060, 2060 and 1660!
🟣5% OFF PREDATOR MOUNTS LINK: www.predatormo...
(any order will support the channel)
US Parts To Buy (Amazon Affiliate Link): www.amazon.com...
UK Parts SCAN (Affiliate): tidd.ly/3TdYCJz
DISCORD: / discord
Become a member to support the channel:
/ @tenpoundfortytwo
New to Star Citizen? Use a referral code for some extra credits: robertsspacein...
Donate to directly to support the channel: paypal.me/tenp...
Test Setup
Star Citizen Alpha 3.22
Resolution 1080p and 1440p
Main System
CPU: 7800X3D
RAM: 32GB 6000MHZ CL30
#StarCitizen #SpaceSim #PCGaming #Squadron42 #S42
I believe the 4060 beats it at lower resolutions because the 4060 has about 10 times the L2 cache capacity, while the 1080 Ti can match and beat the 4060's performance at higher resolutions due to the 1080 Ti's wider memory bus (352-bit vs 128-bit). The relatively massive L2 cache (24MBs on the 4060 vs 2.75 MBs on the 1080 Ti) offers better performance the smaller the data that is being addressed, while the wider memory bus doesn't become a limitation as quickly as the resolution increases, compared to the tiny 128-bit wide bus on the 4060. It goes to show how architectural decisions can impact framerates at various resolutions.
Great info thanks! I'll pin this!
back in 2016 I bought my 7700 1080ti 32gb system and still play most games well enough for 1440p. i spent around 1500 to 1700 for this pc at that time. I consider the 1080ti some golden age tech for how well it has kept up.
Ah, old friend..
Anyone still using a 1080ti?
The only reason I have compelling me to upgrade, is the fact that I own an 8K TV, and though 4k SC, max settings is sufficiently 'peng', being able to play at 8K would be four times the amount of 'peng'.
Still can't justify the price though, which sounds a bit stupid considering th average price of an 8k 86 inch TV. The difference, is I got it at a considerable discount. The TV didn't cost much more than flagship GPU today.
It's worth noting, that though many modern games will choke at like
yeah, got mine in early 2017, some ROG OC version for €860, not even the cheapest 1080ti back then.
just looked thru my pc window and oh boi, its covered in a thick layer of dust, didnt realize it was that bad
I dont wanna play SQ42 in 4K on it tho, also its still coupled with a quad core and 16gb ram,
What will be released first? SQ42 or RTX5090? whats ur guess? ;)
my guess for sq42 is Q42025 but i have no guess for rtx5090 release
if sq42 releases first i might as well upgrade very soon
Using it right now while watching this vid and playing SC. Averaging 65fps in Loriville. Been rocking this card for over 8years. Getting my new pc this Sunday upgrading to RTX 4090 founders ed and AMD R9 7950 X3d.
@@michaels2258 Those X3D CPU's are a literal gamechanger. You won't regert it.
@@michaels2258 1080ti has been out for exactly 7 years, 2 weeks from now
Just built a itx build with an old 1080ti i had lying around together with a 5800x3d and 16 gigs of ram. Was worried at first that the gpu and ram would make the game not that good but in 1080p its doing great mostly around 60+fps . Dont really "play in citys but it performs better than the laptop its replacing. Compared to the big brother with a 4090 and 7800x3d in 4 k 32gb ram its a simmilair experience . Clouds are off on the low end build though
I had a Gigabyte 1080 Ti for a long time and fully concur that it is still a beast and able to run modern games pretty well. I upgraded recently to a 3090 just to see what the ray tracing and DLSS nonsense was about. Those features are probably the only thing giving the edge to the 4060, however it will be interesting if AMD's FSR (or CIGs scaling tech) becomes available for the 1080 Ti, as this will make the 1080 Ti a very viable cheap option.
Been running a 1080ti @1440p on water for 6 years. she's doing so well that i've rewarded it with a 5800x3d (saw a huge increase in 1% lows coming from a 8700k) After that, I don't think my situation calls for an upgrade until Vulkan.
this is one of the few games I still play on a regular basis.
We typically see ithe 1080ti's advantage fade away in newer games that uses async compute, compute shades, mesh shaders, variable rate refresh, all techniques that speeds up specific parts of rendering. While star citizen is adding new graphics effects, it's still using the underlying tools from the DX11 days, and the 1080ti is an old fashioned beast at that, big chip, high clock speed, lots of memory, vs the cut down newer cards like the 4060 and 6700xt that are really weak in raw compute, relying on those techniques to deliver reasonable performance.
We see this reflected in the behavior, behind the 4060 in space, neck and neck in lorville where they have to deal with way more geometry and memory, way ahead in Orison where the clouds are just a compute benchmark.
I've tried 4090 on 1440p monitor followed by 1080Ti more as a joke and I couldn't believe how well it performed. Yes, it was running 100% all the time, but temperatures we're not crazy, and game run lowest around 16fps compared to 4090's 25fps at Lorville (sometimes) but most of the time 40+ fps. I also have a laptop 3050Ti with 4GB VRAM and you just can't play SC there it's 20fps average.
Droppin by to say I tested out SC on a friend's 1080ti build this weekend, I gave them my 5600x (after I'd upgraded to the 5800x3d) and they grabbed an am4 mobo and ram. At 1080p 30-80 in a18, 1440p - 25-45, 4k - 20-25
I upgraded from my ASUS ROG Strix 1080 ti OC edition only last summer. It was stil performing formidably !!! That thing is a true legendary beast !!!
I ran SC on 32 GB ram as well and it was way enough.
I'm still using a 970Gtx and work perfectly for Star Citizen in 1080p
30 fps in cities, 60 fps in space
It's only since this years with some recent game i need to change my 970 because they need 6GB of VRAM and i only got 4
But if this wasn't the case i should totally continue with my great old friend for sure.
Interesting. Wonder if full Vulkan will change this. Pcie 3.0 seems to be plenty still.
Yeah very good question! Yep pcie 3 doesn't seem an issue with something this level.
My Brother had a GTX 1080 non Ti, but that card was running with 1950Mhz@ 0,86mv ! 130Watt Peak. My GTX 1070 was running with 1987Mhz@ 0,96mv with 150Watt Peak ^^ The 1080 got a Rajintec GPU cooler als well, never seen 60°C again. He done Crypto with it and after 4 Month he was finished with the pay off. xD
Both cards still running in the rigs of the sons from a coworker.
Im using them in SLI. Yes star Citizen Supports SLI.
I am very curious if the Radeon VII would run Star Citizen well. I know it is such a rare card that it problem does not matter but I aways thought it was a neat design for a GPU.
It warms my heart to hear you saying the 1080 (Ti) is legendary. ❤
I remember running two EVGA 1080 Hybrid in SLI and playing Mass Effect: Andromeda - in 4k, back in 2017. Glorious times! :)
Still riding out my 2080 super. Play with friends with newer cards and the improvements seem negligible to just ok in SC. Using with 3900x 32gb ram
I am , 1080ti founders with a 5800 3d. It’s been great!
a 1080ti goes for around 300-400 dollars where i come from. has been for 4+ yrs. excellent card and i own 2 of them and ran SC until december 2023 with it.
my wife runs this game with an i5, 32 gigs rams, and a 1050, does it look good? no. but she plays the game and loves it.
[Question] When Vulkan is fully implemented into Star Citizen, do you expect that it will mean an upgrade in hardware will be required?
Would be nice if you added an average of not just standing in empty soace but focused mostly on real situations a player would actually be in on a daily. What I mean is it would be nice to see an avg fps for bounty hunting in space, for example. This is where real fps fluctuation and inherently gameplay experience show their true colours. I know servers fluctuate, ofc, but this would be a more realistic gpu representation in my opinion.
I can tell you that on 1440p monitor it was perfectly playable. When I got some crazy FPS drops, all my teammates with better cards got them too. At any point I didn't get in to situation where FPS would affect my gameplay, only new locations or burning caterpillar were issue (for everybody). I would not buy 1080Ti to play SC, but if you already have it you're good to go.
@MaraxOne I concur with your statement. I'm just trying to say that static scenes are not a representation of the actual fps one might experience in usual gameplay. From what I saw, being in empty space alone is one thing, being in empty space with AI immediately drops somewhat the fps, let alone if one is in asteroid fields. But then again, he is just trying to find the most replicable baseline, sc is so unstable from play to ply this whole conversation is pointless 🤣
@@StillnessInMotion88 I mean, you can always try the game during free weekends to see if your pc needs an upgrade before you buy it...
My 5700 XT has had no issues with SC's Alpha at all. I hardly ever even get a missing floor glitch. And Full Release Games are no issue at all, Hell I never had ANY of the problems people were crying about CyberPunk having. unless I got in a FAST car and went in a straight line through the city, then my system would bog down a little. I have Far more problems with too many players in one area of SC then I do with Graphics.
I have to ask more about what you found with the clouds. My 5800x3d / 1080ti at 1440p, drops from 100-120fps (fantastic performance) to, AT THE MOST, 30fps if i turn clouds on! How did you get these results? (edit sorry thats at ORison or Microtech, havent checked Hurston.
I'm thinking to buy one of these for my new rig until the new cards drop in, no reason to pay anything more at this point
Would love to see a comparison like this including an arc 770 with the new drivers.
Love it!
still crazy to me that a 7 year old gpu is still worth considering, around 2000 a 3 years old pc was already antique, in my memories at least.
I’m using this exact same build :)
Hmm currently still rocking an RX580. I've been waiting for a good sale on an RX 7800 XT (and for money to start growing on trees again). Knowing how slow the 580 is, I wonder if this might be a worthwhile temporary card. Finding one used that is still in decent condition might be a bit harder though, considering it's not exactly a recent card.
I just sold my 1070 and it literally looked and ran brand new. Gpus if used for gaming tend to last a REALLY long time.
@@shanks2872 I may have to give it a whirl then. Thanks!
In many ways I think this sort of echoes the fact that SC at its almost core is still a sort of 2016/2017 game. Looks a lot better than it did back then of course, but a lot of people bought 1080s (including me!) for Sq42.
1080Ti didn't seem worth it over the 1080 at the time but it really was the card Nvidia couldn't make again (at that price). I actually think sadly in that way, and how it affected their market segmentation, it may have done more 'harm' than good (basically killing RTX2000/some of 3000/expectations of 4000), but there's no denying it was the 4090 of its time.
Stock price
Bit long in the tooth for me that one. Hoping to get a 4000 series soon. Probably a 4070 Super. I would consider a 4070 Ti Super but they don't do a FE AFAIK. I'n only interested in the FE versions.
Yeah I've really liked the fe 3080 and 4080 that I've got!
loved my 1080 TI changed to a 3080 and didnt get much of a improvement on star citizen
My Son plays on an AMD 8350Fx and Invidia 1060 yeah it slows alot but he is playing it 😂
you didnt show your settings
I sold my 6900xt to go back and buy a 1080ti, The legend lives on.
Imagine if you get rid of this cooler and put AIO on it
too bad no stats on the 2080super, mine was a beast
2080ti?
7700K is also still beast 😢
Team 1080ti over still a beast confirmed. 🙂
Average fps 38 on a 3060? Why are you lying man 😅