1:28 The Variant that was shown in this video was ZZ-a. ZZ OP (formely ZZ) has just OCLL (Orientation of the corners of the last layer) and PLL. Another ZZ Last layer approach is to solve the corners in 1 alg (Coll) and just do EPLL (Edge permutation of the last layer). Also, EO-Line isn't only the first step. It can be EO-Cross.
Actually CFOP has more than 100 algs because f2l cases also count as alg And you don't need to learn >400 algs (Zbll) for zz, you can just do Oll+pll or use Coll+Epll
I somehow tried to solve the cube with my invented method (Cross on all faces), inspired by Michelle on her 3x3 sub 1 challenge. You put the edges on their correct position and solve all the corners (I use the niklas alg and beginner method). Its just some kinda funny method since I dont rlly use it to speedrun
I love Heise method. Because it makes me think. I solve the cube instead of applying a bunch of rehearsed moves that I don't understand. Small detail: I am a mathematician. This means that I am biased towards anything that mentioned algebra. This method is not the best in terms of speed. It actually quite slow. But it is universal, as it can be applied to any rubik's style puzzle without any modifications. This does not mean that you should love it too. Not at all. It is a method for people who like math, algebra, and who just want to be able to solve the puzzle without memorizing any of the algorithms and to whom the speed is not an objective at all. The method is also good for generating solutions with small average number of moves. but it is nowhere near the god's number.
@@victhecuber5956 not really Mehta is for people who want to think they are cool but don’t realize Mehta is trash and at that point you might as well use Petrus cus it’s better
1:28 The Variant that was shown in this video was ZZ-a.
ZZ OP (formely ZZ) has just OCLL (Orientation of the corners of the last layer) and PLL.
Another ZZ Last layer approach is to solve the corners in 1 alg (Coll) and just do EPLL (Edge permutation of the last layer).
Also, EO-Line isn't only the first step. It can be EO-Cross.
I only knew 6 methods. But this vid showed me that there are more methods. Damn, i didn't expect it to be this much
you did Petrus-W for Petrus.
Actually CFOP has more than 100 algs because f2l cases also count as alg
And you don't need to learn >400 algs (Zbll) for zz, you can just do Oll+pll or use Coll+Epll
Ya but he's talking about Last Layer
Who said he was talking about lastlayer
@@ATKConley but most algs he provides comes from last layer.
If you think f2l cases count as algs, you're doing something wrong
F2L doesn't count imo, you learn most cases intuitively and only few require actual memorization
15:09 15:20 SCARY S MOVES
Edit: After like 5 months I've been defying this comment completely, I HAVE JOINED THE S MOVE PEOPLEEEEEE-
As someone who still currently practice petrus method I can confirm I do not exist.
tysm for featuring my belt method!!!
5:44 its actually not 300 algs.........just 8
no its actually 300 for full
He's talking about simplified
I somehow tried to solve the cube with my invented method (Cross on all faces), inspired by Michelle on her 3x3 sub 1 challenge. You put the edges on their correct position and solve all the corners (I use the niklas alg and beginner method). Its just some kinda funny method since I dont rlly use it to speedrun
It's called tripod because the unsolved pieces form a tripod shape
2RCM solves 2 rings on the top and bottom, solves the centers, and solve the layer in between the 2 rings.
My method DXFOP starts with 2x2x2 into double xcross then last 2 pairs then last layer oll pll and is a fast method
Isn't that just petrus block + 1e? Also why not just plan a double xcross or full block (granted i suck a roux fb planning but still doable)
I love Heise method. Because it makes me think. I solve the cube instead of applying a bunch of rehearsed moves that I don't understand. Small detail: I am a mathematician. This means that I am biased towards anything that mentioned algebra. This method is not the best in terms of speed. It actually quite slow. But it is universal, as it can be applied to any rubik's style puzzle without any modifications. This does not mean that you should love it too. Not at all. It is a method for people who like math, algebra, and who just want to be able to solve the puzzle without memorizing any of the algorithms and to whom the speed is not an objective at all. The method is also good for generating solutions with small average number of moves. but it is nowhere near the god's number.
8355 method is cool too
teehee DOXXED: 2:33
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
AHH HIS CUBE IS SO CRUNCHY I NEED IT😭😭
I believe it's one of the cheap gan 356
I love your vid
Zbroux ? I'm interested in this method, do you have tutorials on it?
I cant find tripod method tutorials ANYWHERE
first
LMCF was invented in 2016 sorry for spam commenting
For CFOP, you missed out on like 4000 algo's
What about gulak
WATERMAN BEST METHOD
i agree
what about mehta?
It’s just a worse version of cfop
@@BenjaJohnsonIII more of a worse version of petrus (petrus is good)
@@BenjaJohnsonIII Not really. Mehta and CFOP are very different.
@@victhecuber5956 not really Mehta is for people who want to think they are cool but don’t realize Mehta is trash and at that point you might as well use Petrus cus it’s better
No
0:55 Or 16 a for 2-look of both
hello
Hi
Why i got this in my recommendations?
Because you watch cubing vids? Btw, stop asking these questions, because it is not a joke anymore in 2021
Oki, I'm sorry😓
@@jiranhiro9794 nvm just saying
@@randomcubing7106 Daddy chill
Why do these sound like tax forms?
last spam comment i promise. I have made an experimental method called Octagonal Francisco.
How does it work?
@@victhecuber5956 i done forgot lol
@@lukascubes9132 oh ok.
Im just gonna do CFOP or Roux...
I think that Roux and Waterman has the same LSE but you need to do the edges in a particular order or you'll have Pseudeo LSE.
Hello
hi
@@RowanFortier😂
@@RowanFortier 😂😂😂😂😂
@@RowanFortier Basitblaze
I use ZZ zipper
What bout 8355 ?
Ok
Beginner method
What Cube is this? Brand / model?
I think it’s the GAN X or Xs
@@RowanFortierI think its the 356 xs.
Petrus isnt garbage
😂😂😂😂😂