I’m developing my own method using God’s number. The main issue is learning 43,000,000,000,000,000,000 algorithms, but the payoff is gonna be incredible 😊
Hey im curious about something! There was a method an old cube ytber (forgot the name) used called zz-ct, do you know about this and how does it differ from zz?
From what I can tell it starts off the same as normal ZZ, until the last slot where you just insert the edge (like the ribbon method at 4:35). Because it’s ZZ, the yellow cross will be oriented so the ‘TOLS’ case is easier to recognise. I’m still not sure if it’s worth learning all those extra algs lol
The reason the "corner first" was the method used in the first speed cube competition in early 80's is probably because the original Rubik's cube was packaged with a pamphlet introducing/explaining the cube on one side and show levels of success on the other. The levels were: Good: one face, Very Good: 2 faces, Master: all corners and Cubist: full solution. So for early Rubik's cube solvers, because of the pamphlet, doing the corners first was probably thought the way to go. I wish I could find a scan/picture of that pamphlet.
I learned to solve the cube when it came out in 1980. I remember that pamphlet. I also had "The Ideal Solution" which came out at the same time from the Ideal toy company. Supposedly it was Erno Rubik's original solution. That's the method I learned from. It employed a top layer (except for one edge), place then orient the bottom 4 corners, place the top and bottom layers' remaining edges, then place and orient the center edges. I don't see it discussed much these days. I tried other methods throughout the years, and end up going back to this method. I had a folder that had all my documentation associated with the cube, including that pamphlet and "The Ideal Solution". Unfortunately a flood in the 90's destroyed everything.
@@DrR0BERT That is still how I solve it too, but I didn't have a book to tell me how. But I haven't seen anyone solving the corners the same way I do yet. I got a book as a gift once, but didn't really care about the methods in the book. The one thing interesting from the book was to learn that middle pieces rotate on themselves. A rubik cube made of images instead of color, after solving, might not have the right orientation to match the image.
I use blind method. Specifically 3 style method. But there is also Orozco. 3 style simplified, M2, U2, Old Pochman, EKA, and possibly more, but the fun is to memorize the cube and proceed to solve ir without seeing anything, I love it.
Honorable mention should be 8355. It's an amazing method for beginners, as it's largely intuitive with very few algs (arguably only need one), but also very simple. I've taught this to people first over LBL, with fantastic results
I was going to bring up 8355 as I just learned it about a month ago. Got my first cube in the 80s (still have it) and used to be able to solve in under 3 minutes. Never got into speed cubing but just started playing with my cube again and couldn’t remember all the algorithms I once knew so I started looking for an easier method of solving, just for my own personal enjoyment…8355 to the rescue! My best time so far is around 4 minutes and I’m hoping to get closer to 3 minutes with practice. No expectations of being competitive…just a nice way to pass the time when I have a few minutes to spare. If you haven’t tried 8355, give it a try…not having to memorize a bunch of algorithms really gives you the feeling of solving it rather than simply memorizing many possible solutions.
@@11am2search RUclips, there are a few. It's amazingly simple. All those videos that say beginner method is the easiest are just wrong. The only problem with it is that if you want to be a speed cuber, it might slow you down. Maybe someone could analyze all the cases and make algorithms for the last 5 edge stage, but the attraction is that it is so easy that you don’t need algorithms or triggers.
Easiest to hardest (In terms of algorithms to learn) 1. Intuitive 69. DEVIL (Solve the entire cube using ~N PERM!~ 2. Beginner 3. Roux 4. CFOP 5. ZZ 6. Ortega (Solve a belt, solve the white SIDE, solve oll, and then solve the rest with 1 alg.) 7. Angels method (Solve EO, then solve the rest with 1 alg.) 8. Gods method *this is the method my cousin uses* (Solve everything with 1 alg.)
the second method i learned besides LBL was actually Edge First (6 cross method) it only requires 1 algorithm that is a 4-mover, basically meaning you dont need to memorize any algorithm. Its super beginner-friendly, i learned it under 5 minutes and its surprisingly not bad, my pb is about 20 secs, but the tps was terrible, which means you can definitely sub 15 (or sub 10) with that
Oh that actually sounds quite interesting. But then don’t you have to learn how to do corner commutators? That’s a little tricky for beginners I thought
Very good video. I appreciate learning about the different methods. I have used CFOP since 2018. I originally learned CFCE in 2003 but didn't know till today what it was called. When I look back at the notation from the book I have, I am impressed I was even able to learn to solve the cube because it is very poorly written. It did help me get a basic understanding of how the cube could be solve, I figured out how to solve the first two layers intuitively, and then memorized two algorithms to solve the last layer.
@@ScoochCubing also some are actually auf... Some are 1lll some are plls..... so subtract 3915+21+(6x3) algs from 7 quintillion (3915 for 1lll 21 pll 18 for aufs) And yeah M S and E moves can add more 9 to it so 3954+9=3963 algs are not even needed. So actually not that much(but still a lot)
I actually made 2 of my own methods which actually work an they are the blocks method and FCOP. Blocks is based after petrus where first you make a 2x2 block, then you extend the block until F2L is finished then you do oll and pll. FCOP is what it sounds like. F2L, cross, oll, pll.
@@ScoochCubing Yeah, let me DM you! I have it laid out on an old website on a CD somewhere... but Rubik's had an edges first beginner's method on their website in 2004 when I first learned and I made shortcuts to the method to make it more viable from a speed perspective. I think I ended up with 3-4 algorithms total. I'd probably adapt it now I have a lot more experience but let me dig it up this week and send it your way, I think it'd be interesting to share it, as I think it could be useful as a beginner's method, though has some intuitive steps to it.
Hey, I know this video was made BEFORE this happened but also an update on 1 look last layer, someone under the alias of "EDMARTER" has finished his road to full 1LLL and learned all 4000 algs. He has a complete ao50 and ao100 with it on his youtube (again, "EDMARTER").
I created my own method. I call it Eecou method or frias method (it's my last name), it's actually similar to 4 different methods. It's similar to cfop, roux, zz and belt. Eeocu comes from it's steps. E stands for 1x3x2 EO Line. Or Basically one roux block and then an EO line Which is actually similar to zz, roux and belt. And make sure you start with the blue roux block. It's very important. And make sure yellow at bottom. Then the next step. Edge inserting. So basically you insert the rest of the yellow edges. Make sure if it's red or orange, after you insert it's edge, you fix the blue side, it's similar to cfop. Next step. Corner-Edge Inserting. It's like f2l. But make sure you end it with a flipped edge f2l case, which you can fix by doing a sledge hammer and then doing R U' R' U, R U' R' U2 and Inserting it and that step is similar to cfop. And then next step is 2 look OLL. And of course similar to cfop. And the reason you ended corner edge Inserting with a flipped edge f2l case, is because you won't get a dot, instead you could either get a line, hook or a cross. Then after you do oll. You use any algorithms to make it to a u perm or any other algorithms. That's why it has under 10 algorithms. And that is Eecou method. (I'll do an example solve in my channel)
fun fact: if u need to solve a Rubik's cube one look without memorising u just need to know 45,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000(45 quintillion) algs and for another fact no one use this😅
@@RubikTf Diiferent steps than anything previously made before? Just envision how you want it to work, and where you will need algorithms! Working on a solver specifically made for building algorithms, I can release it when I’m finished.
0:22 _"This method is very easy to learn, as you only need no memorize a minimum of __*_six_* algorithms."_ and then there's beginner Roux, which only requires *_two_* algorithms.
@@ScoochCubing when I was first learning, I was real stuck just on the second layer in LBL-honestly, I think LBL is just a bad way to start-but beginner Roux worked for me
@@ScoochCubing I enjoy it! I don't have all that much time to practice, so I mostly solve while doing other things and my times aren't that great. I recently found out that my right block was the worst step-I would have guessed my CMLL recognition, but nope. in some way, right block is closest to CFOP, and that's where my move count and execution time are the worst.
@@thoperSought Yeah whenever I try roux I struggle on the right block too. It’s because there are a lot of blind spots which make look-ahead hard. But it comes easier with practice
What the heck! CFOP is already hard to learn for me. then there's a lot of methods? My way to solve Rubik's and i am slow btw because i am pwd...I use F2L of CFOP then beginners method at last...i can't memorize the algorithms of OLL and PLL 😩
@@ScoochCubing May i ask you a question?i use f2l of CFOP and beginners method at last part..but now i solve it by f2l without the cross..i start with half cross and start the f2l there then the half..after that i use beginners method..it is considered as short version of F2L and beginners method?
um, i'm sorry? you mixed layer by layer with beginner's method. layer by layer has cross, corners, then edges for F2L. then its just 2-look OLL and PLL. Beginner's method is daisy, corners, then edges for F2L. then you have cross on top then 'PLL', then sexy move corners.
I think beginner’s method is layer by layer… it technically is because you’re doing one layer at a time. And then 2 look OLL and PLL falls into the CFOP method, hence the name 😂. I can see how it can be a bit confusing though
I'm really proud of myself for being able to solve the cube by myself, without looking for instruction. To be honest, I didn't have a lot of option, as I didn't have much access to internet 😅. It was 2008 or something, so congrats, 15yo me! 😂 Anyway, Corners First is the way I came up with and I did just like that, corners first, then top and bottom simultaneously, then rearrange the middle layer. Oh, I'm really proud of the algorithm I used to solve this parity. It was ugly, but worked 😅😂
15 year old me learned to solve by myself with my own method in 1981. No access to the internet then either, although the bookstores that year were full of books showing solutions. I held off looking at anyone else's method until I could reliably solve it on my own. I can't really remember exactly how I solved it then, but I'm sure it was pretty ugly (as was the cube I was using). I think it also took me a good 2-3 minutes. Now I'm learning Roux. Man, the cubes are so much better these days.
@piratedamon80 really nice, so it's a 40yo hobby, right? Amazing! 1981 was around the time rubik's cube came around? Congrats! I'm also trying Roux right now, it's interesting re seting the way to think solves
![The BEST Speedcubing Method? [CFOP/ROUX/ZZ] Comparison](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QKK8J3JKWi4/mqdefault.jpg)
Very good video!
Good quality, nice voice, informative, entertaining, nice background music...
Thank you 😊
I don't hear background music
@@mihajlosreckovic5240im not a doctor tho...
I’m developing my own method using God’s number. The main issue is learning 43,000,000,000,000,000,000 algorithms, but the payoff is gonna be incredible 😊
I came up with that first
At least the algorithms are shorter than N perm
Hahahahha
Your not the only one
R u serious
please full tutorial on zb methor (4k algs one)
Haha probably not. I don’t even know the method. There’s some other tutorials out there :)
6:09
ah yes 2+2=5
Yea don’t ask how I messed that up 💀
Hey im curious about something! There was a method an old cube ytber (forgot the name) used called zz-ct, do you know about this and how does it differ from zz?
From what I can tell it starts off the same as normal ZZ, until the last slot where you just insert the edge (like the ribbon method at 4:35). Because it’s ZZ, the yellow cross will be oriented so the ‘TOLS’ case is easier to recognise. I’m still not sure if it’s worth learning all those extra algs lol
@@ScoochCubing yea I heard it was like a fuck ton of algorithms lol,
Also found the yter I used to watch, hes called colorfulpockets
I wanna learn zz method by your teaching plz make it happen
You forgot one more method: The iconic “I just peel the stickers off”
well try to do that on a stickerless cube lol
@@germartopasi4383 🤣
CPOF
@@isayaacorn cpop
@@germartopasi4383 💀
The reason the "corner first" was the method used in the first speed cube competition in early 80's is probably because the original Rubik's cube was packaged with a pamphlet introducing/explaining the cube on one side and show levels of success on the other. The levels were: Good: one face, Very Good: 2 faces, Master: all corners and Cubist: full solution. So for early Rubik's cube solvers, because of the pamphlet, doing the corners first was probably thought the way to go. I wish I could find a scan/picture of that pamphlet.
I learned to solve the cube when it came out in 1980. I remember that pamphlet. I also had "The Ideal Solution" which came out at the same time from the Ideal toy company. Supposedly it was Erno Rubik's original solution. That's the method I learned from. It employed a top layer (except for one edge), place then orient the bottom 4 corners, place the top and bottom layers' remaining edges, then place and orient the center edges. I don't see it discussed much these days. I tried other methods throughout the years, and end up going back to this method.
I had a folder that had all my documentation associated with the cube, including that pamphlet and "The Ideal Solution". Unfortunately a flood in the 90's destroyed everything.
@@DrR0BERT That is still how I solve it too, but I didn't have a book to tell me how. But I haven't seen anyone solving the corners the same way I do yet. I got a book as a gift once, but didn't really care about the methods in the book. The one thing interesting from the book was to learn that middle pieces rotate on themselves. A rubik cube made of images instead of color, after solving, might not have the right orientation to match the image.
As a cfop user I'm very amazed on how many other unique ways to solve a 3x3
I use blind method. Specifically 3 style method. But there is also Orozco. 3 style simplified, M2, U2, Old Pochman, EKA, and possibly more, but the fun is to memorize the cube and proceed to solve ir without seeing anything, I love it.
bld is goated
Honorable mention should be 8355. It's an amazing method for beginners, as it's largely intuitive with very few algs (arguably only need one), but also very simple. I've taught this to people first over LBL, with fantastic results
I was going to bring up 8355 as I just learned it about a month ago. Got my first cube in the 80s (still have it) and used to be able to solve in under 3 minutes. Never got into speed cubing but just started playing with my cube again and couldn’t remember all the algorithms I once knew so I started looking for an easier method of solving, just for my own personal enjoyment…8355 to the rescue! My best time so far is around 4 minutes and I’m hoping to get closer to 3 minutes with practice. No expectations of being competitive…just a nice way to pass the time when I have a few minutes to spare. If you haven’t tried 8355, give it a try…not having to memorize a bunch of algorithms really gives you the feeling of solving it rather than simply memorizing many possible solutions.
Are there any tutorials for this? Solving 3x3 is getting boring for me and I want to try some new methods
@@11am2 have you tried roux yet?
@@iesusdesus5704 yea but I have trouble remembering all the coll algs
@@11am2search RUclips, there are a few. It's amazingly simple. All those videos that say beginner method is the easiest are just wrong. The only problem with it is that if you want to be a speed cuber, it might slow you down. Maybe someone could analyze all the cases and make algorithms for the last 5 edge stage, but the attraction is that it is so easy that you don’t need algorithms or triggers.
Imagine if someone learn all these
Edit: schooch may have learnt all these
No… too many algs for my brain to handle
@@putian_ye its around 4000
6:33 do a tutorial for ZB
It a challenge
And do full ZB
BEST VIDEO OF YOURS
thanks :)
This might be the first video showing methods that actually shows the Watermann or Corners first method. Very cool.
You missed the best method: F3L. It's the fastest, only not super easy to pick up
Explain
You mean 1L?
Easiest to hardest (In terms of algorithms to learn)
1. Intuitive
69. DEVIL (Solve the entire cube using ~N PERM!~
2. Beginner
3. Roux
4. CFOP
5. ZZ
6. Ortega (Solve a belt, solve the white SIDE, solve oll, and then solve the rest with 1 alg.)
7. Angels method (Solve EO, then solve the rest with 1 alg.)
8. Gods method *this is the method my cousin uses* (Solve everything with 1 alg.)
what LMAO your cousin is insane
those damn asians man.
Your cousin taught Erno Rubik how to solve his own cube
Just switched from cfop to roux 🗿
this was awesome!
explained each one awesomely 😄
Never knew there were so many methods! I only knew bout 3/4th of em lol.
Update: an youtuber named EDMARTER learned full 1 look last layer
Yeah I’ve seen that haha, incredible. Would never have expected someone to actually do it
I'm developing a method called BOOOL method
Dislikes are from those who can't solve the 3x3
the second method i learned besides LBL was actually Edge First (6 cross method)
it only requires 1 algorithm that is a 4-mover, basically meaning you dont need to memorize any algorithm.
Its super beginner-friendly, i learned it under 5 minutes
and its surprisingly not bad,
my pb is about 20 secs, but the tps was terrible, which means you can definitely sub 15 (or sub 10) with that
Oh that actually sounds quite interesting. But then don’t you have to learn how to do corner commutators? That’s a little tricky for beginners I thought
Very good video. I appreciate learning about the different methods. I have used CFOP since 2018.
I originally learned CFCE in 2003 but didn't know till today what it was called. When I look back at the notation from the book I have, I am impressed I was even able to learn to solve the cube because it is very poorly written. It did help me get a basic understanding of how the cube could be solve, I figured out how to solve the first two layers intuitively, and then memorized two algorithms to solve the last layer.
What?? 2003? I swear cfop wasn’t even a thing back then. That’s so impressive you did that haha
what about mehta?
Didn’t know that much about it
ah understandable
Great video! I’m also a cubing channel that makes videos about different methods :))
the belt method is what my dad uses on me
Maybe try convince him the ribbon method is better
For 1LLL u need to learn 1211 algs if u mirror them etc
Want Roux method ✨
The best method:
Learn 43 quintillion algs
Or 43 quintillion/6(If you are colour neutral)
Oh yeah you divide by six. Never thought of that. That’s easy then. (not really lol)
@@ScoochCubing still more than 7 quintillion
Yes
7000000000000000000
@@capabilitymaster4034 Hahaha
@@ScoochCubing also some are actually auf... Some are 1lll some are plls..... so subtract 3915+21+(6x3) algs from 7 quintillion (3915 for 1lll 21 pll 18 for aufs)
And yeah M S and E moves can add more 9 to it so 3954+9=3963 algs are not even needed. So actually not that much(but still a lot)
How
You uploaded your pre uploaded video as a live video
it's called a premier
@@ScoochCubing
Oh
I didn't know that
I'm trying to learn the ZB method and it's going pretty well so far. I am also going to practice cross+3 in inspection so that I only have two pauses.
I use APB method because i think it is faster so I will practice it very well
I actually made 2 of my own methods which actually work an they are the blocks method and FCOP. Blocks is based after petrus where first you make a 2x2 block, then you extend the block until F2L is finished then you do oll and pll. FCOP is what it sounds like. F2L, cross, oll, pll.
Team Roux 🙋🏻♂️
team belt
I have an edges first method that's not on this list. Sort of a high beginner's level method. I used it to ~40s before I jumped to CFOP.
Oh that actually sound like an interesting method haha
@@ScoochCubing Yeah, let me DM you! I have it laid out on an old website on a CD somewhere... but Rubik's had an edges first beginner's method on their website in 2004 when I first learned and I made shortcuts to the method to make it more viable from a speed perspective. I think I ended up with 3-4 algorithms total. I'd probably adapt it now I have a lot more experience but let me dig it up this week and send it your way, I think it'd be interesting to share it, as I think it could be useful as a beginner's method, though has some intuitive steps to it.
@@ScoochCubing I just joined your Discord, I'll share over there once I find it.
Oh wow that’s cool, so it was actually an ‘official’ method at some point haha. Surprised I never heard of it before
Can u please make a tutorial for ZB method,
I want to learn all 700 algorithms
Nah I know basically no zb haha. Watch max siauw’s tutorials
mehta and heise are also pretty interesting
Hey, I know this video was made BEFORE this happened but also an update on 1 look last layer, someone under the alias of "EDMARTER" has finished his road to full 1LLL and learned all 4000 algs. He has a complete ao50 and ao100 with it on his youtube (again, "EDMARTER").
Yeah I saw the video haha. Fair play to him
@@ScoochCubing Yeah. Apparently, he once learned 144 algorithms in 1 day!
WHAT!? 144 algs! OLL, PLL and COLL combined are only 120 algs haha
Petrus is actually coated especially for OH but people just refuse to develop it
Ill stick with cfop...
Remember me from your discord server
Hi
I created my own method. I call it Eecou method or frias method (it's my last name), it's actually similar to 4 different methods. It's similar to cfop, roux, zz and belt. Eeocu comes from it's steps. E stands for 1x3x2 EO Line. Or Basically one roux block and then an EO line Which is actually similar to zz, roux and belt. And make sure you start with the blue roux block. It's very important. And make sure yellow at bottom. Then the next step. Edge inserting. So basically you insert the rest of the yellow edges. Make sure if it's red or orange, after you insert it's edge, you fix the blue side, it's similar to cfop. Next step. Corner-Edge Inserting. It's like f2l. But make sure you end it with a flipped edge f2l case, which you can fix by doing a sledge hammer and then doing R U' R' U, R U' R' U2 and Inserting it and that step is similar to cfop. And then next step is 2 look OLL. And of course similar to cfop.
And the reason you ended corner edge Inserting with a flipped edge f2l case, is because you won't get a dot, instead you could either get a line, hook or a cross. Then after you do oll. You use any algorithms to make it to a u perm or any other algorithms. That's why it has under 10 algorithms. And that is Eecou method. (I'll do an example solve in my channel)
200++alg...300++alg....wow even to remembered 10 alg took me some time, the speedcuber contenders really is something else 🤯
ZB = scawwy
also 302 + 472 = 774, not 775
Cool, now how can I make a daisy 🌼?
Pog. Wrm 2021, Tornado v2 or 11m duo?
i actually bought one of them lol
Wait a minute, isn't belt method, cfce, ribbon and zb method just *"Deconstructed CFOP?"*
Yeah you can think of them as variants of CFOP
"no one is yet to learn 1lll" Edmarter: ...
Make a Tutorial on Corners First and Petrus method pls
Really good video but you missed the hexagonal francisco
What the hell is that 😂
@@ScoochCubing i saw it in a short
What about APB method? It is defenitley more advanced than ZB method
Haha apb looks interesting, it was made more popular after I made this video though
I learned how to do the layer by layer today. I got it memorized pretty fast but now I’m gonna try getting better at it.
i got 15 sec with layer by layer( beginner method)
@@Daroname 15 seconds is crazy my record is 64 seconds
I just use CFOMFOPB
cross f2l oll mess up f2l oll pll blame cube
The best method of course
Can you make a video about all the Algs of 1LLL ?
I would for the memes but I think I would get too tired 200 algs in 😂
Some of them aren't even a new "method" it's just cfop but with some modification to skip a few steps and make things unnecessarily overly complicated
Yeah CFOP are the base of a lot of them, but most people still consider them kind of separate methods
do the tutorial of ZB method i wanna learn the 4000 algs 😁
Haha imagine 😂
I've gotten up to doing cfop for my f2l but I still do top layer the newbie way
You should start with learning 4-look last layer! It’s only a couple new algorithms and a lot faster
For the Zb method, he added wrong
bruh
Oh yeah HAHAHAH
I made my own method but it has 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 algorithms
Sounds interesting
Ah yes.......Memorizing 775 algs is definitely much better that doing that WHOPPING extra 4-3 move last pair insert
ya
I liked the cfce method
Can you make the full tutorial on it
I was thinking about doing that
This was after your video was posted but as of last year
@EDMARTER is the first known person to learn 1lll
Yeah I saw that! So crazy
CFCE lowkey seems cool
fun fact: if u need to solve a Rubik's cube one look without memorising u just need to know 45,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000(45 quintillion) algs and for another fact no one use this😅
I “invented” my own method called COES, and it’s the exact same thing but less algs.
Oh cool! Is it your main method or are you still working on it
You forgot the most popular method
Only 2 steps
Disassemble and assembl
and peel the stickers off and re apply them
Currently working on my own method, hopefully it will be good enough to make its way onto lists like this!
How do you create a New method?
@@RubikTf Diiferent steps than anything previously made before? Just envision how you want it to work, and where you will need algorithms! Working on a solver specifically made for building algorithms, I can release it when I’m finished.
I never knew about cfce, ribbon and Zb method...
I know the ribbon me5hod
0:22 _"This method is very easy to learn, as you only need no memorize a minimum of __*_six_* algorithms."_
and then there's beginner Roux, which only requires *_two_* algorithms.
Haha I forgot about that. Roux is actually sometimes taught as the beginners method
@@ScoochCubing
when I was first learning, I was real stuck just on the second layer in LBL-honestly, I think LBL is just a bad way to start-but beginner Roux worked for me
@@thoperSought Oh nice! It’s really cool how different methods work for different people. As a CFOP solver, roux looks a lot more interesting
@@ScoochCubing
I enjoy it!
I don't have all that much time to practice, so I mostly solve while doing other things and my times aren't that great.
I recently found out that my right block was the worst step-I would have guessed my CMLL recognition, but nope. in some way, right block is closest to CFOP, and that's where my move count and execution time are the worst.
@@thoperSought Yeah whenever I try roux I struggle on the right block too. It’s because there are a lot of blind spots which make look-ahead hard. But it comes easier with practice
Can you please make a tutorial on CFCE method
Yeah sure, already have a few videos I need to make but I’ll do it eventually. Been wanting to for a while because it actually looks good
AMAZING!
EOLine ZZ lmoa
And my unique solution from 1986 when I was 12 remains unique.
APB?
What the heck! CFOP is already hard to learn for me. then there's a lot of methods? My way to solve Rubik's and i am slow btw because i am pwd...I use F2L of CFOP then beginners method at last...i can't memorize the algorithms of OLL and PLL 😩
Yeah there are a lot of methods haha. Learning algorithms is hard at first. Takes a lot of time. But it’s so worth it eventually
@@ScoochCubing May i ask you a question?i use f2l of CFOP and beginners method at last part..but now i solve it by f2l without the cross..i start with half cross and start the f2l there then the half..after that i use beginners method..it is considered as short version of F2L and beginners method?
um, i'm sorry? you mixed layer by layer with beginner's method.
layer by layer has cross, corners, then edges for F2L. then its just 2-look OLL and PLL.
Beginner's method is daisy, corners, then edges for F2L. then you have cross on top then 'PLL', then sexy move corners.
I think beginner’s method is layer by layer… it technically is because you’re doing one layer at a time. And then 2 look OLL and PLL falls into the CFOP method, hence the name 😂. I can see how it can be a bit confusing though
No they're the same
What was the cube in this video?
The RS3M 2020. Great budget cube
@@ScoochCubing Oh nice! I was planning on buying it but do you think the maglev version is better?
Im just thinking of learning all those methods. Then combine them for what ever situation is the best.
2045 world champion right here
where's 8355 method
8355 is good too
i forgot about that one lol
Lol 10 methods yet mine isn’t on the list 😅
I use Mehta btw
Oh wow nice. I didn't know people actually use that to be honest lol
How is your leftie U2 so satisfying...
Haha for some reason my lefty U2 is cleaner than my righty U2 and I’m right handed 😭 it’s so annoying for 2x2
I bet you guys that *IF* he did the zb tutorial it's gotta be like 15 hours AT LEAST and it gotta be in parts you know
Can you tell us which is faster on your experience
Out of the main ones cfop is generally the fastest
Why is cube for speed more popular than you?
He makes a lot of videos
Someone managed to actually learn 1LLL by now :)
I know!! I didn't think that would ever happen. That guy is insane
which is the easiest method for beginner..???
I would highly recommend the beginner's method, just because if you want to get faster there are a lot of things you can improve on
I solve it using begginner cfop and only 2 algorithms
I knew Cfop Zz Roux Petrus Belt Zb
Wow nice!
wow, you're using the same V perm alg as I do
Pog,u told many methods that I didn't knew
So... where is columns method?
Don’t know much about that one. Is it good?
This is 7 mins and 1 sec you liar you said 7 mins
Damn it, my bad
How did u grow ur channel I’m finding it reallly hard
Isnt petrus blind fold method
No. You might be thinking of fmc? Lots of people do petrus for it because it’s move efficient
I'm really proud of myself for being able to solve the cube by myself, without looking for instruction. To be honest, I didn't have a lot of option, as I didn't have much access to internet 😅. It was 2008 or something, so congrats, 15yo me! 😂 Anyway, Corners First is the way I came up with and I did just like that, corners first, then top and bottom simultaneously, then rearrange the middle layer. Oh, I'm really proud of the algorithm I used to solve this parity. It was ugly, but worked 😅😂
(Insert Obama meme here)😂😂😂😂
That's really impressive that you actually figured it out yourself, good job haha
15 year old me learned to solve by myself with my own method in 1981. No access to the internet then either, although the bookstores that year were full of books showing solutions. I held off looking at anyone else's method until I could reliably solve it on my own. I can't really remember exactly how I solved it then, but I'm sure it was pretty ugly (as was the cube I was using). I think it also took me a good 2-3 minutes. Now I'm learning Roux.
Man, the cubes are so much better these days.
@piratedamon80 really nice, so it's a 40yo hobby, right? Amazing! 1981 was around the time rubik's cube came around? Congrats! I'm also trying Roux right now, it's interesting re seting the way to think solves