STUFF I FORGOT TO MENTION IN THE VIDEO: - For the R U2 R' trigger, you can widen the Rs into Rw U2 Rw' = L F2 L', which gives you a slightly different post-DR to work with. It's good to check both. - Alternative trigger for DR-4e4c: R U2 F2 R (you can also widen the Rs and/or the U2 to become Rw Uw2 F2 Rw) - After EO, you can do a z rotation and make DR on either side. For example, if you have EO on the green/blue axis, you can make a white/yellow DR or a red/orange DR. Check both axes for RZP after solving EO. - When starting out, you want to be able to linearly go from EO to RZP to DR on any scramble, even if it takes a lot of moves (i.e. only checking 1 EO). Once you're more comfortable with making DRs, you can start discarding EOs above 5 moves, RZPs above 7 moves, and DRs above 15 moves (numbers will vary depending on how comfortable you are with DR and how many EOs you check). Top solvers aim for RZP in
Some things that are worth mentioning: - When going from EO to RZP, it is helpful to invert the last move of your EO, in order to check more cases. This is even more helpful when the EO ends in F B or an equivalent (checking R U F and R U F', or checking R U F B, R U F' B, R U F B', and R U F' B'). - When setting up to a 4c2e trigger (R U2 R'), it can help to think of the lone corners + bad E-slice edge as an "inverse" column. - For the 3c2e trigger (R U* R'), you can make the pair (lone corner and bad E-slice edge) first, but you can also make a bad pair (lone corner and bad U/D-layer edge) first, as well. - Although you implicitly said this, you are able to (and encouraged) to look for multiple RZPs per EO, especially really short EOs. - When NISSing (after EO, RZP, or any step of any method you are using to solve the cube with), you will always get the same type of case. For example, if you NISS after getting to DR-4e4c, you will still have DR-4e4c on the other side of the scramble. Excited for the next video! You should make an EO video as well :D
Nice video 👌 I’m surprised why you still only have 6k subscribers. Wish you all the best for a great future! I’m eagerly waiting for the HTR tutorial. 😊
I think it's the same, but Kociemba's algorithm is for solving cube with computer, meanwhile Domino reduction is a method for a Human to solve the cube
Thanks! one upped the other guy but anyways can you please make a tutoriel on how to improve at megaminx i have a comp in september and the cutoff is 1min 45 and i average like 3 so can you help
Hi, i've done eo, dr and htr but i ran into some sort of parity. Like an N-perm: There are only opposite colors on every side, but it seems it's not solveable with only half turns. How do I fix this? Or what do I need to do to avoid this case?
That's called fake HTR, and you're correct that it's not solvable using only half turns. When you do a 2qt trigger and end up with fake HTR, you should undo the trigger, set up 3 bad corners to 1 side of the cube and 1 bad corner to the other, then do a double turn on your DR axis (i.e. if your DR is red/orange, do an R2 or L2). Then, solve HTR again without using double turns on the DR axis. It's pretty hard to explain but Tom Nelson has an HTR tutorial that covers it
@@JavaCuberthanks, now i've got it...man this is hard! I thought FMC was easy😂 I didn't find his turorial very helpful, but after reading the hyper parity document he put in the description four times or so, i've understood how it works😂
![accidentally breaking 2 more state records - 23.67 PR mo3 [FMC DR/HTR]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_z96f2vnsqE/mqdefault.jpg)
![accidentally breaking 2 more state records - 23.67 PR mo3 [FMC DR/HTR]](/img/tr.png)
STUFF I FORGOT TO MENTION IN THE VIDEO:
- For the R U2 R' trigger, you can widen the Rs into Rw U2 Rw' = L F2 L', which gives you a slightly different post-DR to work with. It's good to check both.
- Alternative trigger for DR-4e4c: R U2 F2 R (you can also widen the Rs and/or the U2 to become Rw Uw2 F2 Rw)
- After EO, you can do a z rotation and make DR on either side. For example, if you have EO on the green/blue axis, you can make a white/yellow DR or a red/orange DR. Check both axes for RZP after solving EO.
- When starting out, you want to be able to linearly go from EO to RZP to DR on any scramble, even if it takes a lot of moves (i.e. only checking 1 EO). Once you're more comfortable with making DRs, you can start discarding EOs above 5 moves, RZPs above 7 moves, and DRs above 15 moves (numbers will vary depending on how comfortable you are with DR and how many EOs you check). Top solvers aim for RZP in
Top solvers aim for RZP in
Also maybe mention that a synonymous of RZP is DRM?
@@thephysicistcuber175 Does anyone actually use DRM or is it just something everyone agreed made sense but nobody actually uses
@@JavaCuber Not sure, but I can see more people using it in the future.
Some things that are worth mentioning:
- When going from EO to RZP, it is helpful to invert the last move of your EO, in order to check more cases. This is even more helpful when the EO ends in F B or an equivalent (checking R U F and R U F', or checking R U F B, R U F' B, R U F B', and R U F' B').
- When setting up to a 4c2e trigger (R U2 R'), it can help to think of the lone corners + bad E-slice edge as an "inverse" column.
- For the 3c2e trigger (R U* R'), you can make the pair (lone corner and bad E-slice edge) first, but you can also make a bad pair (lone corner and bad U/D-layer edge) first, as well.
- Although you implicitly said this, you are able to (and encouraged) to look for multiple RZPs per EO, especially really short EOs.
- When NISSing (after EO, RZP, or any step of any method you are using to solve the cube with), you will always get the same type of case. For example, if you NISS after getting to DR-4e4c, you will still have DR-4e4c on the other side of the scramble.
Excited for the next video! You should make an EO video as well :D
This tutorial couldn’t have come at a better time. Was just planning on learning dr
Thanks I was waiting for someone to make a tutorial. That was very well explained and it was pretty easy to follow and understanding the concept.
Thanks so much!
Nice video 👌
I’m surprised why you still only have 6k subscribers. Wish you all the best for a great future!
I’m eagerly waiting for the HTR tutorial. 😊
1st reply 😅
Yesss, ive been waiting to learn dr and it seems this is the right time
Domino reduction is literally Kociemba’s algorithm
Yeah. I think those two are the same
I think it's the same, but Kociemba's algorithm is for solving cube with computer, meanwhile Domino reduction is a method for a Human to solve the cube
noo wayy he's making a tutorial
YES 🎉 just when I finished learning DR though LOL
Looking forward to part 2 :)
Useful stuff, especially the tips at the end. Are you planning on doing an HTR tutorial as well?
eventually yes
Thanks a lot❤
Please make HTR to❤
Thanks a lot for making this tutorial
Thank you so much
actually fire vid
So this is the video I will get my 1st WR from
15 fmc single incoming
@@JavaCuber YES MY NAME WILL BE APART OF HISTORY
Lol
Sooooo are you Jeremy Sheng ? (based on your results mentioned at the beginning)
yes he is indeed Jeremy Sheng
@@PugCuber I tried comparing his results with WCA records to find out, I'm not entirely sure
Great tutorial but I don't really understand how you get to DR after RZP without messing up the other edges and corners
tysm for this
Nice video!
Thanks! one upped the other guy but anyways can you please make a tutoriel on how to improve at megaminx i have a comp in september and the cutoff is 1min 45 and i average like 3 so can you help
Thanks so much! I have a megaminx playlist here: ruclips.net/p/PLipyxGUjEHHQLi9_HfRQWZxqp9mQEj-Oi
You forgor 💀 to mention that for the R U2 R' you can also widen the Rs and still get DR from the same position.
thanks; added to pinned comment
or you could just use petrus
What do you do voor 4e5c?
Edit, 2c
find a different skeleton
Hi, i've done eo, dr and htr but i ran into some sort of parity. Like an N-perm: There are only opposite colors on every side, but it seems it's not solveable with only half turns. How do I fix this? Or what do I need to do to avoid this case?
That's called fake HTR, and you're correct that it's not solvable using only half turns. When you do a 2qt trigger and end up with fake HTR, you should undo the trigger, set up 3 bad corners to 1 side of the cube and 1 bad corner to the other, then do a double turn on your DR axis (i.e. if your DR is red/orange, do an R2 or L2). Then, solve HTR again without using double turns on the DR axis. It's pretty hard to explain but Tom Nelson has an HTR tutorial that covers it
@@JavaCuberthanks, now i've got it...man this is hard! I thought FMC was easy😂 I didn't find his turorial very helpful, but after reading the hyper parity document he put in the description four times or so, i've understood how it works😂
50% chance? @@JavaCuber
5/6 chance of fake htr if i remember correctly
where's the second part?
I'm probably not going to make it
@@JavaCuber ah ok
@@JavaCuberThat’s so sad to hear 😢
I was eagerly waiting for your HTR tutorial. Can you guide me to any other material that covers it?