What Minecraft 1.20 SHOULD Have Been...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июн 2024
- Minecraft 1.20 still has an unannounced theme, with most of its major additions still being in the works. Yet, there are some big problems and issues with the game, whichshould have taken priority in 1.20...
Thanks for watching! Subscribe and Join My Discord!
Discord - / discord
Twitter - / themisterepicyt
Twitch - / themisterepicyt
Join my OG Minecraft Server, The OG Network! (1.8-1.19): og-network.net
- Website: og-network.net
- Discord: / discord
0:00 - Intro
0:41 - Vanilla Minecraft Performance
3:22 - Vanilla Minecraft Server Performance
4:38 - Announced/Unimplemented Features
5:56 - Combat
6:55 - The Inventory Update
8:44 - Updating Structure Loot
10:26 - Updating Biomes
10:59 - Bedrock Parity and Bugs
Inventory Mod Used - www.curseforge.com/minecraft/...
Music Used:
1. C418 - Stal
2. C418 - Moog City
3. Scott Buckley - Signal to Noise
4. C418 - Aria Math
5. Feels - Patrick Patrikios
If there is any content in this video which you own and would like removed, than please contact me and I will be happy to oblige.
#minecraft #minecraftlive #minecraft1.20 
Игры
So what do you think 1.20 should have focussed on? Be sure to subscribe and leave a comment!
Join the discord - discord.gg/WGc9UNM
Idk
Forget the skulk/warden dimension we need an end overhaul NOW
optimization probably
It should have focused on updating biomes
The left behind update.
The idea to have smaller updates but more frequently throughout a year could be better for the health of the game. Adding content sooner that’s ready will bring people to play Minecraft rather than delay features for over a year at a time.
Yeah
Its. Not. Fully. Announced.
I mean… they did said that. Smaller updates being minor updates will be more frequently through the year with QoL changes and additions they’re ready to ship (think of 1.4.7 or 1.16.2) being accompanied by the next big update
@@justaguy2183 1.16? Small? What?
@@kyleyoung2464 1.16.2 not 1.16 i think 1.16.2 brought piglin brutes
8:10 It's extremely unlikely that it would've come with the rascal.
Also, having loot improve with time would encourage afking in a world constantly. Maybe it could be based on advancements?
love the sniffer much?
@@toxwinplayz none of the mobs are especially good
People always makes up stuff in the mob votes
@@toxwinplayz aw too salty sniffer won that you cant accept any criticism? it seems your mob is too perfect it seems
You could also tie it into distance from spawn, so say every 1000 block traveled improves the loot quality by 1% (or something actually balanced).
The most we can do is pray that the updates become more significant and have more of an impact.
Good pvz pfp, guy with the pvz pfp
Probably will.They just haven’t revealed much
tbh I think they should just let the modders do the work
remember 1.9?
@@____________________________a that's not a good argument at all. Most of the stuff they make will most likely never make it to the game (wether for stupid reasons or not) and even then we shouldn't be able to rely on add-ons to have a good experience with Minecraft of all things because then is it really a good game? Mojang just needs to stop being lazy.
arent you glad theyre respecting trans rights thats all that matters
BTW, the rascal was never said to give you a backpack, so please, just vote what they tell you trust me, I made a bad decision of making up what they may do by adding the glow squid and regret voting for it.
If people still think the rascal was any good in the first place then color me disappointed.
Glow squid was more of mojangs fault not you
@@tapgames3465 True, that hypnotize shit..
It seems especially ironic, given that he criticises other loot chests for giving items that become basically worthless very quickly, when there was nothing indicating that rascal loot would be different.
@@SamJNE122 yeah
i think that a "quality of life update" could be good, it would include inventory, parity, and improving existing features based on feedback from the MC community...
Did you mean "parity"?
@@lightdreamer_ ya...
Player based chest gen would result in players not opening any chests till they reach the end game, because they would fear wasting precious items
It should be so that chest that are closer to spawn have more common items compared to chests generated farther away from spawn, thus you have an extra motive to explore far away lands
This is a ridiculous idea.
@@confusingzark Nah can work fine if balanced right.
"well uhmmm they can't do a QoL update because it doesn't add anything new"
they could literally just bundle it with a few extra items. seriously, the 1.15 update was 99% bug fixes with the only mechanics being added are bees, they could definitely do it again
Optimize doesn't sells.
@@kiattim2100 Read the entire comment
People got mad at the 1.15 update. Many of then didn't even know it was optimization, they just saw bees and said "nothing else whatsoever? Lazy mojang getting worse again"
@@sagarkathuria8194 I did.
Not with the community crying about how small 1.20 is, they would hate no new content.
Something that isn’t really discussed is that the smithing table has 1 use. It would be really cool if you could add other items to modify your items, as there are attributes already in the game! Or maybe using different items added in the future (like enderite?).
Having lots of different upgrades for Diamond tools sounds fun.
maybe modify shields with it idk
being able to use netherite scrap to upgrade gold gear could be cool since gold has the highest enchantment possibilities
@@loljptrollergami7325 that would be super cool. Maybe it could light the person that attacks on fire for a second (for each piece of armor), so mixing and matching could be super strategic.
@@juiuice *YES*
Another thing for Bedrock that basically no one mentions/ knows about is that when holding space bar while wearing an elytra (in creative) you will be pushed upwards. It is very hard to explain but just try it yourself, trust me.
I don't think judging the update now is very wise, because at the moment we don't know what the update will be. I understand many find disapointing that we don't know the plans for the update but I am sure many more things will be included in the update apart from those anounced given that all the anounced items were in the first snapshot.
Well, yea judging the update that early kind of aged like milk with the armor trims, cherry trees and ARCHEAOLOGY
@@shhinysilver1720 It didn’t age like milk.
It aged like raw eggs outside on a blacktop on a hot summer day.
Let's just hope they listen to the community and add features like this to 1.20 because there's only been one snapshot so far
um. thats the point. there has ONLY been one snapshot yet everyone is acting like this is the finalized version. You all got upset when they decided not to add a feature they made the mistake of showing, so now theyre showing less.
@@aceplante their point was that this isn’t the final version of the update. “Let’s hope they add” isn’t language that says to me “this is the final version”.
@@Spiney09 And im saying you dont have to hope. Ofc they will
@@aceplante Well with the way mojang and microsoft are going i really doubt that they will listen to their community. If they did listen to their community there would be tons of change over the last few updates but that never happened.
@@aceplante they have not listened to the community. Server owners have for years been asking them to improve the optimization of the game, myself included in that group. Plus there have been a lot of features that they promised but have not delivered, that people want still.
So acting like “it’s so obvious they’ll do that” is not merited based on their past actions. If they’re not going to add the features, they should just tell us. Leading fans along for almost a half decade in some cases isn’t listening to your community at all.
You do know that Mojang stated the update DOES have a theme? Just no name. Mojang also stated that they redstone is exept from full parity. Yeah, moveble hoppers would be great, but the fundamental difference between Bedrock and Java is update order, and that would be hard to implement in Bedrock, because computer stuff I don't understand (I think).
There is already mods for movable block entities on java so it is possible to implement (and apparently is not hard or so said the devs of the mod)
@@pringle409 That is not the difference. I heard that the important difference is between sending al information at a time (Bedrock) and sending the information in order (Java).
This seems important for redstone. Programming languages don't REALLY matter, because they both need to be compiled. It's like the difference between mashed potato's and cooked ones. It is slightly harder for the body the digest the latter, because chewing is hard, but it doesn't really matter when it is in the stomach.
It is technically possible to program "pure", but that isn't practical at al, so it is almost not used anymore.
@@enn1924 Programming is never the issue in Minecraft. Except for optimisation.
@@caspermadlener4191 with major optimization comes major bugs, I should know, I play Bedrock
my prediction before mc live was something like the "Digs and Dunes" update. Something that would update the old biome vote desert and badlands options as well as their structures. I hoped the creative tab changes might have also indicated some inventory update (i mean they still could). And the concept of the rascal made me feel they wanted to do some extra things with the mining experience
Bamboo boat:
They never said the Rascal would drop his backpack. I think it's pretty good that what happened with Glowsquid didn't repeat again, players thinking the mob would have some ability or drop it just didn't had
Plus if the Rascal had one it would have been another dissapointing blue mob vote mob. XD
I think the Bundle is a fine item. It helps when you have a bunch of random items, like a diamond, bunch of diorite, a Golden Apple, mushrooms. I think the Bundle is fine as is.
I agree, it's pretty useful above all during exploration, when you collect a lot of "junk" that can easily fill your inventory. It's a shame that it's still not available.
I would never put diamond nor golden apple inside tbh, it would make getting more of diamonds irritating more than anything because I would need to put them in the bag every single time. Apples should been in the hotbar… and for the other junk, why don’t just drop them? Honestly, more than a bundle, Mojang should add trash button
I also don't get it why people hate it so much. Yes, it could be improved a little, but in early game it's pretty good. And if you don't have random items to put into the bundle, then you can just pun one item into it so it doesn't take space
Sorry for bad English
Thats because the biggest thing youve ever worked on is probably a simple house. Shulkers are mobile chests, but a bundle is just a few slots, an absolute mess, and not worth the effort. Nobody taking the game serious would ever make more than maybe 1 bundle prior to the end (something people usually start with on an SMP) and then it becomes entirely useless after shulkers.
So why even add it? Why spend the time or effort making a new inventory managing item if its funtionally useless to those of us with shulkers? I will never use these in my modern survival worlds. Stop defending everything mojang does.
8:13
Whilst yes, the Rascal could have given us Backpacks as a reward, that’s the key word: COULD. There was no guarantee that the Rascal would’ve been anything further than just an enchanted Iron Pickaxe, and that being the end of it’s functionality.
It COULD have been a full on companion like a Wolf, sharing inventory and potentially assisting in Mining or Combat. But, that’s not what we saw.
So, going by the logic of “What we see is what we get”, Mojang EXPLICITLY states that there is more coming alongside the Sniffer, primarily in the form of new Seeds and Plants. On a raw, objective level, the Sniffer presented more ON THE TABLE than the Rascal or Tuff Golem.
I honestly could care less about an end update, we spend over 95% of our time in the over world. Why not make the over world run smoother and look better. I love that they are adding new features that use old features. I do feel like bamboo farming will be very op now though.
I agree, but I want an end update because it is very empty, like 99% of it just made out of one block
it makes it very boring and uncomfortable exploring it or trying to find an end city
you probably will visit it just once and never return back. They can do the same thing as they did with nether update, then they can continue updating the overworld, actually they update it more than anything else.
Tbh part of the reason we spent so much time in the overwolrd is because how baren of content the two other dimensions are, like mojang has added so much to the overworld already I'd prefer they would focus on adding stuff to the end and nether for a bit (ik we just had the nether update 2 years ago but it still leaves a lot to be desired compared to the overworld)
You just gave a reason why we need an end update, we spend so much time in the overworld that we need more reasons to explore the other dimensions.
@@cjfrost1441 fr it's why I don't want a new dimension rn since except for certain farms the current dimensions are already barley used by players and a new one would suffer in the same way...
The reason you spend your time in the overworld is because they haven't updated the end 👀
your inventory changes are basically "more slots", which doesnt do anything to eliminate clutter, it just lets you have more of it. and most of xsiuma's ideas are just "making ur hotbar easier so u dont have to open your inventory", doesnt change the clutter or make u have to manually organize less.
your structure loot idea won't work that well on servers, and it would be really strange to go to an identical structure and get way better loot later in the game.
exactly.
Just replace the world day count with player statistics for how long they've played for. Ez.
@@SashaMasonVR still unfair to new players on servers
loot becoming better over time doesnt make sense in general. cuz then there is also the question of "hey why did this blacksmith have 5 diamonds when my first blacksmith had only an apple?" (not verbatim, but you get the point) same amount of work, but more profits. there is no skill behind it either and you might as well just AFK in ur world
I heard a theory that the theme of the update is revealed by looking at Agnes' survival world, where she likes to write lore, spread clues all over the world and show it to whoever visits it. And that the update is meant to make what she calls "telling your own story" easier. Signs to mark places, bookshelves with story books, camels for the owner of the world to show it to another player, and so on.
In conclusion, 1.20 is the "tell your own story" update.
You have to remember that so far they've only shown (and added to the snapshot) features that are 100% complete
You have to remember that game is going to die unless they fix these issues
Stop defending mojang it wont do anything good
@@lamarr51 But that’s literally what they said? That’s your fault if you that you refuse to listen
@@KudosMSGP ??? Learn to read maybe
@@lamarr51 ???
the milk update before i watch it
Not exactly lol...
@@TheMisterEpic coward
The milk update more like the milked update
based comment
How did you get the diamond sword emoji in your name?
The adaptive loot could use advancements, since they are prolly best way that the game itself has of telling how far the player has progressed.
Having loot chest generate better and better loot over time is probably a bad idea, since a player could just AFK in a hole for several days after generating a new world to get better loot. If it were to be added it should be based on how many loot chests a player has opened or something similar.
Maybe put some flags internally for example if the player has created a few diamond tools/armor pieces then set a flag to true and upon opening the chests the game should look for those flags so even if they don't have the stuff on them they should still get good loot.
@@malick9549 so just do advancement checks?
@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 that can work on java but not on BE/PE since you get advancements only once.
@@malick9549 so just check the same requirements for advancements on bedrock without showing?
@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 I'm sorry I don't understand your statement...
I know this wouldn’t solve *every* inventory problem, but I think that stack sizes need to be increased. Terraria has increased their stack sizes a few times, and every time they do, organization and building gets ten times smoother. It would suck losing the classic 64 stack size, but at this point I think it could do with an increase
at the very least increase stack limits on the items that stack to 16 (except maybe ender pearls since that might be for balance reasons)
Yes, I agree. At the very least make it a toggleable option or something in the gamerules. If you want to keep "Classic Stack Size", then turn that option on. (May have to have the world locked into that mode though, idk)
nah, that is holy in my opinion. the 3 x 9 inventory: not holy. 64 stack size: holy
@@Gandhi_Physique I can see stack size as a data pack for map makers. That way they can set the stack size of every item however they like.
I think that is also because Terraria focuses a lot more on exploration, combat and fighting bosses and waves of enemies that just require you having a whole bunch of special items on you, different weapons, different ways to move around, potions for healing ect. The amount of gear you can find in the game from exploring and also the amount of gear you have to keep on you late game to actually do well would break all bounds of what Minecraft allows you to carry.
Minecraft started out as a game focuses around basic survival and building structures. It works well if you play it exactly like that, but if you want to have additional pieces of gear on you, it'll get cluttered fast and none of that is ever really much of a requirement either. So yeah maybe increasing stack sizes and inventory slots would be much helpful. Like who's gonna use potions in survival when you run out of space so fast with them?
Considering how you can simply just sit in a hole for 1000+ days without doing anything (unless you're playing on hard mode, then you'd have to eat), I don't think a day count for loot is exactly the best idea.
I agree that there should have been an update like this. Essentially, some features of MC need to be refurbished. Player animations, entity models, textures (like how the creeper doesn't blend in anymore), loot, structures, MC's static nature, moveable tile entities, performance, animations, ambience, MC being way too easy ∴ very boring to play by yourself, etc. need to be improved. But, I think it is a good thing that Mojang isn't promising too much as that's what they did for 1.17, and maybe even 1.18 since the Deep Dark was delayed. When I watched MC Live for 1.17, I immediately knew there would be no way they could deliver. That was just too much content. I think they were running off the high of the Nether Update. Stepping back and taking a breather is okay; they care about the game and are trying to rebuild trust, and this is the way they can. Just give it time, they care, but they have their own lives, plus their morale is probably low after putting in so much time for such a 'meh' response to 1.19. I'm sure they care, they just need a break :D!
The Creeper texture must not be changed; it's the most iconic character in Minecraft!
@@Faizan29353 honestly if it weren't for it being iconic i'd trash the current creeper (massive progress lost/ugly hole in the ground because the game lagged or you failed to react within like 0.75 seconds of the hissing) and replace it with a new version that doesn't do block damage and camouflages better by using the dungeons texture
I personally really like what they're doing with 1.20. We've already got every feature shown at Minecraft Live in a snapshot, so now every week is going to be a surprise, just like in the old times of Minecraft, and I find that pretty exciting!
I love how the whole point of this update is to tune down the hype, speculations and hate around the update and all we get is people hating how little the update adds to the game, as well as people speculating and getting hyped about things they haven't promised or backed out on or forgot about.
@@chgeri2232 yeah because you dont set the bar so low that you cant possibly underdeliver, you set the bar at a relatively high place and try to overdeliver. if you guys think supporting this kinda behaviour is gonna improve anything, you are just doing what they want lmao. mojang is going to get lazier and lazier because not enough people punish them for it.
@@adeus_sinister yeah because monetizing content will definitely get them far with shitty updates like this (not to mention how many people would straight up not even consider buying dlcs because of the worlds current economical state). so unless they want a way worse rep and gains, doubt that will be happening anytime soon. please, do come with an actual point next time though.
@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 They are saying that Mojang will over-deliver on this update, surprising us with new features. They explicitly said the update wouldnt be this small at minecraft live. Besides, this is the quickest we've ever been able to test new features, so is it really bad?
You want mojang to set the bar too high and then underdeliver??? You people will really never be happy.
@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 Yeah Mojang got soo lazy like look at 1.18 and half a year later 1.19. These updates were soo insignificant. Did not add any new world generation or big biomes and structures. Super lame and not thought through. Especially this deep dark thing like yeah it looks alright but the blocks neither have redstone functions nor drop xp or so its all useless superficial stuff that needs no work at all duh
In minecraft live, Agnes did say that what was announced was about 100 percent complete. This means what has been announced is only a small portion of the 1.20 update
9:06 end cities have enchanted diamond gear? 🤨 if it was that easy to obtain netherite armor, then it would make the game too easy and create 10x more complaints
Netherite armor gives only knockback resistance by what I remember so its a waste of perfectly good netherite
I feel like 1.20 would be more hyped if instead of announcing a few minor features that are basically already done, they should've at least announced one bigger feature that they know they can finish before the release.
Yea and last time they did that everyone got upset when they decided not to add it. So now theyre announcing less, becuase thats what the community wanted
@@aceplante But if they're absolutely certain that they can add a feature, then there's no reason not to announce it.
They should've done it the same as they did with the nether update. They announced big things like new biomes and mobs while also keeping a lot of features secret like the basalt delta, netherite, piglin brute, strider, etc
thats what they planned to do with the past 3 updates with the warden
@@Dolphin002 thats exactly wut they did with the new mountain generation but weren't able to deliver until 1.18. If we were never told we were getting new mountain generation before 1.17, people wouldn't have gotten so letdown. Your first comment is a perfect example of what people don't want cause Mojang doesn't know for sure for any new big features will make it into the next update. It would be technically fine if they announce what features they are planning on adding. Just don't say this will be included in 1.20 or whatever update and instead just say it'll come in the future. Even so, it would be better to keep stuff hidden in case something goes wrong and decide not to add some feature. Announcing new features basically forces them to add it at some point or else the community gets mad
I think I say for more than myself that I would be more than happy with an update just introducing optimizations, bug fixes, and parity changes if it meant that we got pre 1.12 performance again. 1.15 was supposted to be a bug fix update but that was 5 major versions ago, we need another update like that.
10:10 but there also should be advancement check for that
For example: there will be no loot better than current vanilla loot no matter how much days past unless you get to the nether(or some other things) otherwise, we can create a new world, afk for a looooong time in a place that mobs cant reach and get rare items in early game
Or just allow cheats then switch to creative mode when the mood takes you. Afking or ignoring chest is just a worse way of cheating.
hearing rascal voters say rascals would’ve added a backpack is like saying phantoms would’ve added a unique pve experience 😂
backpacks were not promised at all from rascals, and is entirely made up by the voters, long live sniffer
I’m pretty sure he said it could’ve not would, so he’s just hypothetical hoping it would have been the drop of it, if it won but yea I had to listen again to hear what he said
Yeah that's a very big stretch for adding an item Mojang literally said they would never add
Exactly meat riding so hard they come up with there own "confirmed knowledge" lmfao
@Gaia Sure, but they could've acted as cute moving item frames (We don't really have moving item frames in the game). That's literally the only reason I voted for them.
I swear all sniffer fans are the same. cringe af
More inventory is the equivalent of "Just one more lane bro."
Here’s a take on the bundles:
in the terrafirmacraft mod, an item called vessels exist. They act in a way similar to bundles. They have an openable gui and get around the excessive storage limit by having smaller stack sizes then the regular inventory slot. Maybe something like that could work for bundles too?
I think dynamic loot is a bad idea, since it discourages the player to explore until an arbitrary time limit is hit. It could be implemented in better ways, but I still feel like it would break things if implemented badly.
I'd much rather have unique loot in each structure, like Sniffer eggs and Cobwebs only spawning in Mineshafts, Skulk stuff only spawning in the Deep Dark, Allays and Totems of Undying only spawning in Mansions, and so on.
Be able to move chests, hoppers, furnaces etc with pistons > new bookshelfs
Hoppers are sometimes used as a transparent block that's immovable, so we'd need to have a block that fills that role. Maybe an obsidian slab?
@@LloydTheZephyrian Bedrock Edition can move those items using piston so why not in java
If yall want that shit so bad they better give up quasi-connectivity, 0-tick pulses and garunteed Redstone before they even think about changing java redstone
@@winterkavinel7243 bedrock has a different collision box system, it has its advantages but it affects modding a lot, bedrock blocks can't have custom shaped collision boxes like in java.
and shriekers, so I can finally summon a Warden at my base
0:58 you convieniently left out the fact that half of 1.15 was dedicated ENTIRELY to optimizing the bugs and performance issues caused by 1.13.
Honestly, vanilla performance isn't even that bad. On 1.19.2, with 12chunks on a moderately low-end pc, I can get 60fps (which is pretty good imo)
Bro do you have a low end NASA computer
I would get like 10 fps and realistic flames
1:33 that hurts... that's my normal performance...
I think in terms of structure loot, better loot should be in new or revamped harder structures
I would love to hear Xisuma and MisterEpic have a conversation. Xisuma has a lot of well thought out understanding takes, where as MisterEpic has much more passionate or emotionally charged, though still valid and certainly not uninformed, takes.
Why does everyone want massive updates in these updates now? I like small and focused ones. I don’t mind big ones but they shouldn’t happen often. My only hope for future updates is we get a working Bundle for all platforms.
The only other big update I personally want is an end update I don't really care after that oh and add some dungeons content while you're at it.
I like small updates to but if they will release only one update a year they should def make it a big one, before microsoft minecraft used to have small updates but multiple updates a year even multiple a month in the alpha phase
With the tying loose ends update, yeah it might be nice for the most active players, but that sort of update just does not sell to a wider audience. If someone who wasn't too into minecraft and only plays after each update is announced with their friends for a bit saw a basically "adding stuff that was already announced years ago" update, they'd probably not be as excited as seeing brand new ideas announced and implemented to the game
But then you announce those brand new ideas only to exclude some of them, or add new blocks that exist purely as placeholder and then never get around to doing something with it, and it just gets more and more people disappointed over time. Imagine announcing an update and setting certain expectations only to not deliver on them at all and then wondering what happened with those ideas? Like with the Fletcher Table, that thing still feels like a placeholder block that was meant to be used for something but they just forgot about it.
I saw a lot of people happy that the update didn’t overpromise. I happen to love everything introduced. I feel really disappointed about the lack of promised features too though. Caves and cliffs was underwhelming too. There’s nothing to hint at another end update. I want another update for performance improvements. For 1.13+, that update was 1.15. 1.20 appears to be a smaller update, so I really hope it comes with hefty performance improvements as well. And then inventory update needs to follow.
I don’t know if it’s possible to get bedrock’s redstone mechanics exactly the same, and in reality a lot of technical players play Minecraft in a way most players don’t. They seem similar enough that a lot of basic devices should operate the same.
Yeah ik I understand that the cave generation took a long time to tweak and such but only having three “biomes” added was disappointing and not much is even in those biomes. I scarcely even call the drip stone caves a biome, I mean they are literally just regular caves with drip stone, no different generation, mobs, blocks. Where are the mobs??? The only new cave mob we got was the warden and by their own account shouldn’t even be fought
bedrock runs on a completely different system then java tho :l
@@darkithnamgedrf9495 nah I think the caves and cliffs update was perfect, I mean we got exactly what we wanted - a major upgrade to the caves, mountains and terrain generation. More biomes should've been added in the 'Wild' Update to make the game more 'Wild' , but instead we got 1 biome, 3 new mobs (2 of which do not exist irl) and 1 structure.
@@spoabz2390 I love the new caves but I also think that they feel kinda empty and I would've loved just one more cave biome.
If they decide to add one in the future new chunks needs to be loaded which is the one disadvantage of not going all out when revamping world gen.
Many people hated 1.15, so sadly most people don't care about optimization and just want content
I disagree with your opinion of bundles In my opinion it's a really great for early game storage before getting a shulker box even if you already have a shulker box the bundles are still useful for organising.
Yea bundles would be excellent early game and would hold value for a player like me constantly looting and exploring vast amounts of my would, would only extend my hunt
Exactly. The idea of bundles isn't "Adding more storage", it's about using existing storage more efficiently by being able to stack blocks and items together that you usually cannot stack together at all and each take up their own inventory space. If you have 5 different colors of flowers, that's 5 inventory spots gone just for flowers even if you only have a few each.
Y'all sleepin on bundles. I've been caving a lot with like 2 bundles and it saves a lot of space. Especially since the raw ores were introduced. You can compress 9 items into 1 and it will only take up 1 slot in the bundle. You couldn't do that with the ore blocks themselves. For example, 63 iron ore blocks will take up 63 slots in the bundle vs 63 raw iron which can be compressed into 7 raw iron blocks that take up 7 slots in the bundle. Also helps when you have little amounts of various resources that you don't want to throw away.
minecraft has so much potential with these kinds of updates but so little is being done, hope this changes soon
I feel like 1.20 isn't as bad as other people think. First of all, they said that as time goes on, more features will be added to it. Also, it will be an opportunity for Mojang to ask the community what features they want. Also, having a smaller update with more quality of life features is better than a big update in which most of the features won't even be added in my opinion. The standards for Minecraft updates are too high nowadays, which is the only reason people hate this update.
The standard for minecraft updates increasing can basically be blamed on 1.13 and almost every update past that lol
1:27
What it feels like to walk in the marketplace on bedrock
Loved the video, such a nice content :) Btw, whats the shaders that you used in that "village" shots?
Minecraft: The Minecraft Update
With the update structure loot portion of the video I think having it detect achievements for it to decide what loot you get would work better than checking time played.
You mean I can't leave a world open all week while I'm at work and come back to get the super loot from the villages?
Dynamic chest loot is cool but I feel like most people would just start a world, maybe find a temple, then afk for an irl day and get op loot without really playing.
Idea: not let the daycount decide the chest loot, but your achievement progress - it would not only be a more accurate representation of the players progress, but also be finally a reason to hunt achievements.
The inventory update has potential since mcpe got new control options which would make it easier to use the offhand similar to java edition which would allow the rest of the bedrock platforms to add it and other features
About the optimization thingy XIsumavoid did a video that i think is a really good answer as of why they dont do it. I think ti was "Could they add optifine to minecraft" and if not probably was "why cant mojang develop like modders"
Also i kinda get mixed inputs on your take on bundles i feel like you dont like the fact that they are not in the game yet but you also wont like them once they are here LOL
Mister The Epic = clueless guy
I don't think an inventory update is that necessary, I feel like inventory management is a key part of the game
9:45 I would tie dynamic loot to advancements, it would play nice with progresion and ecourage players to actually do them and any given advancement could have an effect on loot in a surtain way, like diamods advancement could add diamond stuff into the lootpool and so on, this also would go well with custom advancements on something like rpg maps, luck potions effect could complete the next few random advancements in advancement tree, one tier up
given on bedrock, achievements are per player and not per world, it would require adding advancements from java to bedrock, but that’s really the only problem i’d see with this
Minecraft doesn’t seem to have their priorities straight at all with these updates and it’s sad
I feel like what they showed is cool, but there’s some things that I wish they could add
I'm sure its not the game itself but the programming language. I believe my coder friend once equated the difference between Java and C++ in terms of performance being the performance difference between a 60's Volks Beetle and a Lambo 2010.
EXACTLY
The idea of a loot change based on the in-game day is not bad at all but i think that it would be abused in multiplayer since even if you log off as long as the server is on you will get better loot. So my idea is to change the loot based on the advancement system the more advancments you unlock the better your loot is. Plus it would make dificult and unececary advancements such as how did we get here or caves and cliffs a lot more usefull.
3:11 looks sick! what was used to create that?
The world on the background/shaders/pack (if used)
This is really what it should be. At this point in time, I could care less about new features. I want Mojang to fix everything up, and then, when everything is finally caught up and bug free, they implement more features.
My thoughts too.
If chest loot was based off of player progression, then players simply wouldn't raid structure chests until they have legitimately (slowly) climbed up the power ladder. The loot will always be sitting there waiting for you, so why right click it now when you could play Minecraft for a few hours and get 10 times better loot later on.
I don't think this system fits in with the game, things get even more awkward when you start abusing the system with multiplayer.
I really like your idea. I would love to have an update to tie up all lose ends so we can finally move onto to bigger stuff like the end update
1:05 Something I realised before, and only recently remembered as I was struggling with the game stuttering whenever I would start moving the mouse: Check your mouse's TPS (the poll rate)! If it's too high, that can cause the game to lag as well.
I don’t understand it. It’s the Features that we’re the first to be done… of course they won’t be big, crazy things!
Well don't you feel stupid now that 1.20 is one of the best medium-sized updates we've ever gotten
1.20 was one of the worst updates. 1.19 was better than this bullshark update.
Remember before flaming what we have now, know that they only showed finished items and things that were complete and confirmed. There’s still a lot of stuff to be made
The issue of Minecraft java performance is not going to change significantly in a long time, there are several options that Mojang can take without having to change the game code, these can be: Add the option that the height of the water does not have transparency and decrease the amount of grass that spawns in a world, I don't know why they haven't made this change or added this option, since this exists in the Bedrock version of Minecraft.
The issue of Bedrock version bugs is something that has always bothered me and I can't find any logical explanation as to why they are not solved, as it is possible that Mojang does not pay attention to the version that generates more money, for example; when a small lighting bug is reported in minecraft java it doesn't take more than 2 weeks to fix it, on the other hand in bedrock it takes months to fix it, it's not possible that if they're aware of it and don't take care of the performance, it doesn't surprise me anymore none of this, I expected nothing less from you mojang, many blame Microsoft, but they only included micropayments and chat bans (Which is bullshit).
Mojang is the one that decides to give more importance to spin-offs than to the main game, and I don't consider myself a hater of Mojang or its games, Minecraft is my favorite game and I consider Mojang programmers to be very good people, but I can't defend its shortcomings as a developer studio, comment if you think the same.
It's a good idea to have a tying up loose ends update. But it's also a bit annoying that people complain about how they're not gonna get certain features when they've only released the first snapshot and made it clear they'd only talk about/show off features that were far enough in development to definitely get added. They will most likely add many more things, so it's a bit misleading and quite annoying that people already label the update as underwhelming.
It's still a possibility for us to get other features in 1.20 they just only announced things that were finished or about to be finished to not dissapoint the us like the last few years.
Should be*
I feel we're talking too soon about a non finalized update in which mojang is implementing community feedback by not talking such a big game about every concept they just *might* put in the game. They just announced what is ready to set in a snapshot. We literally just saw the one snapshot with everything announced up until now
on the topic of revamping biomes, i never really understood why mojang's final decision for the swamp vote features they implemented in 1.19 was to just put all of them into a whole new biome, and just left the swamp with nothing new besides the frogs. I think it would have been much more interesting if they had kept the original biome vote idea of having it all be added into the swamp.
And i can only hope they don't decide to follow the same idea for any other biome vote choices they decide to implement. I can't imagine them making a whole different savanna biome just to add the baobab trees, termites and ostriches.
11:42 That's your opinion
That's like Changing the Redstone logic to a Bugged Redstone logic as a Bedrock player.
Why you think Parity Change like Bedrock should become like java why not Java should become like Bedrock.
+ Microsoft already released a Minecraft Windows Edition if you want Both Version to Look and Behave like the same you can just Switch to Minecraft Windows Edition
Only exception is Linux, Unix, BSD and Macintosh Users
Because Bedrock Redstone is broken. Java Redstone, despite it's "unintentional features" isn't. The fact that the exact same setup, on Bedrock, can produce multiple different outcomes seemingly at random should tell you enough how broken it is. Java Redstone always works the exact same. It doesn't randomly produce a different outcome with the same input. Redstone builds end up working sometimes, and sometimes not.
Other counter argument, Java is older, it's the OG Minecraft, if anything Bedrock should stick to the original, not Java become like it's remake.
Saying the Rascal would bring the game a backpack is as crazy as saying the glow squid would introduce dynamic lighting IMO.
Didn't expect a screenshot from my thread lmao
As always, great video
You know what bro, I finally subbed :) gl on 450k
Definitely can agree with you we really do need a tying up Loose Ends update for both Editions fix major problems on both sides bring the two together on parity!
Minecraft has historically had down updates between large updates. I’m hoping 1.20 fixes a couple things and has no major features. 1.21 then is the end update.
I finished the video and as a tldr to everything I want to or have said: The update isn’t even out yet guys give Mojang a break they been kicked in the balls 2 times in a row they’re still recovering.
Im editing this as I go through the video and rn this seems kinda pointless. But I do agree Mojang should take some time to optimize the game’s code
“1.20 should have been better”:
It’s still brand new also they only shown stuff that they have 100% or 99% finished.
“Why can’t Mojang just fix the game?”:
Yes, Minecraft is backed by a billion dollar company but just because you got more people doesn’t mean its easier to do something. Also they can’t just add something and call it a day they have to test it again and again so that it adds as little bugs as possible.
4:56 :
Because they only want to show and give out stuff that they have finished so they don’t have a firefly incident again. Also like I said before its still new
8:19 :
Don’t talk to my child ever again… (in all seriousness tho it could and should do more like adding more crop seeds or maybe being a tool to help in an archeology update)
12:07 :
This was about how many people are trying to go over 8 million blocks in Minecraft but yeah ~180k is kinda low but still not many are doing that but they it should be fixed, but also, -but still, AAAAAA WTH DO I SAYYYY!!!!
Minecraft is a crowd source game. You've got tons of mods all over the place improving the performance and re adding in old lost mob vote mobs.
It's not finished ffs. They literally said in the live that they only showed what's finished
It's not that 1.20 is only releasing 4 features, it's that they didn't announce everything at once. Looking at how the caves & cliffs update ended up taking 3 releases to become fully 'complete', and all the other back logged things they promised. This isn't the first time, 1.12 was supposed to be the aquatic update, but that got pushed to 1.13. On the bright side, they are honest about it and have never released an update in a completely unplayable state. Some features may be unfinished or broken but the game is always still playable, they never had a CP2077 flop.
It seems they decided to stop over promising at Minecon and to release/announce things as they are ready like it was in the earlier days. I remember in the early snapshots things would just appear and disappear without notice. Features were officially announced when the version was released.
Another thing to remember is that these updates are free, and snapshots don't have to exist at all. Look at all the content added from 1.0 to 1.19 in the past 11 years, all of it for free. Name another game that has that has been supported for this long, consistently and for free. Minecraft could just as easily be like city skylines or sims with every little feature costing $5, $10 or $15. Nope, the updates are just free, with a cool beta program (snapshots) built right in and you get the ability to play any version ever released.
Speaking about performance, I can’t play 1.19 with mods on my pc without having the render distance down to low, but when I play 1.0 it stays a solid 35 with far render and smooth lighting
Yes parity is top thing I really want, but it’s unfortunate some features can not be the same due to engine difference
With what they are adding right now, it doesn’t look like the End is getting overhauled in this update. Adding the previously announced but still unimplemented features like termites, meerkats, vultures, as well as other biome improvements, seems the best way to go here. I’d love to see the performance, combat (including hunger) and inventory getting completely overhauled, but I assume they’re gonna ignore that completely or just say it’s not in the spirit of minecraft or something
We need to get this guy to 1 million, he is amazing with his content
No
@@NaraSherko ratio
@@ButterThatFlies They said "THERE IS A BIG PROMBLEM WITH MOB VOTE" and "MINECRAFT 1.20 SHOULD HAVE BEEN GOOD"
@@NaraSherko ratio
@@ButterThatFlies u have been ratioed lol do u just say ratio when someone says somthing diffrent than you
I'm glad to see that people don't blindly follow everything Mojang says, but criticize their decisions. Mojang should definitely listen to channels like TheMisterEpic.
8:40 to make it not feel random mojang could make it so you only pick it up if you are holding the shulker box, making it faster but organized
omgggg guys gd youtuber spotted!!!!!!!!!!
“Should have been”
They haven’t even announced the theme of the update, you don’t even know what the update will be like
I'd consider 1.12.2 to be the best especially for mods
the only thing about the "day based chest loot" thing is that on a server like 2b2t, a new player could join, find structure loot, and become just as powerful as an established player
other than that great video
It was never stated the the rascal was gonna add a backpack as far as I know
There are so many amazing ideas out there made by the comunity, I think Mojang should make a list of all or the majority of the suggestions and then ask the comunity what they should add. This would involve the comunity more, Mojang wouldn't run out of ideas, and everyone would be happy.
I like the idea about loot changing on progression, you could tie the achievements into the game to determine progress a lot easier
The irony of the splash text at 2:54 is just great
Why do no people understand that what they revealed was only the stuff that was pretty much finished and ready?