For sure, I remember that race, and if I had the cash to replace the TV the next day, I would have smashed my TV with a cricket bat out of pure rage at the time.
That is just racing tbh. The year before Hamilton lost Monaco in the same fashion. Led the race by half a minute over Nico but got screwed by Mercedes on the pit stop call. This is just Monaco...
I'd have put Mika Salo gifting the win to Eddie Irvine when he was filling in for injured Schumacher on this list. Would've been great to see Mika get a win and the result shows what could have been had he not been stuck with poor cars over the years. A podium was still good but he was better than Irvine on the day and the result could've reflected that.
@@user-zv8qg1co4z Kimi at McLaren was the most badass driver of the 21st century. Pure speed. Pure commitment. Something like 40% of his races ended in mechanical failure though.
Michael Schumacher, 2001 Spanish Grand Prix Hakkinen had a 30 seconds lead until his engine blew up in the very last lap and MS was gifted the lead with half a lap remaining
Mika Salo giving win for Eddie Irvine 1999 Hockenheim is the most memorable moment. Salo replaced Schumacher because of the injury. Second Ferrari race for Mika Salo and he's driving on his first win. Needed to give the win for Eddie Irvine. Salo never won after that and Irvine didn't win the champion...
@@oliverwatson6956 Mistakes happen. What matters is recovery. Hamilton couldn't catch Vettel the rest of the race. Therefore Vettel won and should have gotten the trophy. Simple as that.
2002 Hungarian Grand Prix, where Schumacher had an insane amount of pace over Barrichello, but was told to stay behind. It is my favourite in this arena because near the end of the race Schumacher started falling behind by a rather large margin out of nowhere, making people think he suddenly had an issue with his car. And then he put the hammer down and proceeded to put in a lap over 2 seconds faster than anyone else in the whole race, showing the kind of pace and result he could have had if he hadn't been held back by team orders.
Schumacher was in his prime, just amazing. When Nico Rosberg said he was faster than Michael I was laughing cos he was comparing himself to an older aged Schumacher then. Ter isn’t a driver since Schumacher who has shown such legendary talent.
@@mrc14_2 Because he's won 10 so far and is 6 times WDC. Go grow a pair when you're old enough. Only lucky one was Bahrain and possibly Brazil 2018 but that's racing. PS This video is over a year old. Probably has drivers who you've never even heard of. (Sadly I go back further than the earliest race here ! )
Samool 101 Germany 2010 when Ferrari team were fined because they were not allowed to let fernando Alonso to pass Massa they should have tell fernando Alonso to stay behind Massa and let Massa take his first win in 2 years and the first time since an accident in Hungary
@Jeremy Raj Australia 2000 I'll give you, but schumacher won on pace in imola and via strategy in Brazil that year so check your facts before you rant you clown
@Jeremy Raj mika was leading after schumacher made the first of 2 stops, any analysis of the pace delta shows that ferrari strategy was faster and schumacher would have won on strategy Referring to schumacher as a nazi purely because he's German show how stupid you are Any further remarks based on anti German bias?
Alonso. German Grand Prix 2010. The infamous "Fernando is faster than you" that took that win from Massa. What many people don't say often is that it that it had been exactly one year from the accident Massa had in Hungary. That would've been a hell of way to come back for Massa. But Ferrari took it from him. And Ferrari lost the championship. Again.
Im glad "Karma" hit then back and the reason why Vettel/Red Bull won in 2010 was that they had not used teamorders in Brazil to let Webber take the win from Vettel, despite Webber having much better chance for the championship had they done so.... However as the race turned out in Abu Dhabi, had Red Bull used team-orders in Brazil, Webber would have lost the championship to Alonso and Vettel could not have had a chance to win it either....so I was very glad that day that Ferrari lost the championship despite using team orders and Red Bull/Vettel one because they DIDNT use teamorders :D
gt362gamer Why the hell they would have screwed over Webber on purpose? At that point Red Bull had NO preference which driver would win the champioship….as I remember it, Webber was heavily struggling with the grip of his tyres, even brushing a wall, which why he was pitted so early. Ferrari in return decided to react on that, but forgot that left Vettel in much better position. Anyhow Red Bull had the advantage of going to the final race with BOTH of their drivers in championship fight...usually I hear people saying this is bad thing, cause team-mates eat away points from eachother, but at that time it proved to their advantage.
And now Pat Symonds is an advisor to F1 after being banned for cheating... Great way to maintain credibility... We've also been seeing more and more of Flavio Briatore...
I think Jacques Villeneuve should have won Australia 1996. He was only thwarted by an oil leak, but maintained 2nd position. This was Villeneuve's début race, and he fought off Damon Hill, despite his greater experience. I was so impressed, that I placed my first money bet on Villeneuve!!
Also for the Alonso part in the Singapore GP, you forgot to mention that he nearly lost his "win" when Massa could have beaten him to the restart after Piquet Jr's crash but the blunder of the light that caused Massa to launch off the pits before the refueling hose was removed caused him the lead and the whole god damn race.
I disagree with the inclusion of the Belgium Grand Prix in 1998. Damon did send a message suggesting that he and his teammate should hold station but this was only after he had waited for instructions and didn't receive any. This he points out in his recent book. Furthermore he stated quite clearly in his radio message that any decision was up to Eddie Jordan. Considering that the conditions were so bad there had been eight retirements due to crashes by this point it seemed fair that the hold station order was given and to benefit Damon who had been the fastest driver in the team that weekend up to that point However due to the closeness of Jean Alesi in the Sauber the two Jordan's still had to race each other to the chequered flag driving so quickly that they lapped Trulli on the penultimate lap for a second time. One final point. Whatever Ralf's demeanour on the podium might have said, he did accept the result later and wrote a nice tribute to Damon in Autosport the following year after he retired
More than that, it's often forgotten that Ralf was almost 20 seconds behind Damon until a safety car was thrown to mop up the Giancarlo Fisichella/Shinji Nakano accident at the Bus Stop. To say Ralf 'should' have won this race is disingenuous, given that he probably would not have been in a position for team orders otherwise.
Alesi should have won and probably would have if the Jordans scrapped it out. Think Hill put it as bluntly as he'll put ralf in the wall if he tries anything...
The radio broadcasts have been played out earlier this season. Whatever Damon might have said in his book; the radio transmissions don't tell the tale you have.
"I'm going to put something to you here, and I think you'd better listen to this, if we race, if we two race, we could end up with nothing, so it's up to Eddie, if we don't race each other, we've got an opportunity for a first and second. It's your choice," Damon Hill's team radio towards the end of the 1998 Belgian Grand Prix "Ralf, you cannot overtake Damon, that's a team order," Eddie Jordan's order for the drivers to hold station to the end
I would put the (still) highly debated 2008 Belgian Grand Prix. Felipe Massa was definitely the wrong man who was declared the winner of that Grand Prix. Not only was Massa nowhere near battling for the lead outright, but the race should have been about the exciting battle for victory between Hamilton and Raikkonen. Hamilton made a lunge round the outside of Raikkonen, had the door closed and took to the escape road and cut the chicane to avoid a collision. Despite the fact that he let Raikkonen back through, before passing him properly shortly after, Hamilton was given a 25 second penalty which demoted him to third. Many neutral fans cried foul, as Massa was battling Hamilton for the championship, and Ferrari had got away with no penalties for other situations earlier that season, indeed Raikkonen benefitted from going off track at turn one not once but twice in that one Grand Prix
Kimi crashed out though, so it would have been ridiculous had he won, but the penalty for Hamilton that day was harsh. I agree that up until the crash at Blanchimont it was a great drive by Kimi though; him and Hamilton going either side of Rosberg was classic stuff on a slippery track.
Revolver Ocelot - Kimi crashed so the penalty did not benefit the affected party . If they’d given him a 10 or 15 second penalty, he would have still beat the other 2. If they had given him a 20 second penalty, he would have still finished second. They gave him a 25 second penalty which is actually the same as a stop and go penalty at Spa. He passed Kimi by being close to him, not Massa. Giving him a 25 second penalty goes well beyond the bounds of fairness. Guess it all worked out because without that plenty, we wouldn’t have witnessed the greatest finish to a season.
ATS599 - Actually, there was no rule back then as to what he was supposed to do other than give back the position. It was clarified afterwards that he needed to wait a corner before attacking. But your point regarding the penalty is fair enough. My only concern is that it was a 25 second penalty instead of 10, 15 or 20 second penalty. Bumping into drivers gets you a 10 second penalty. Against this backdrop, 25 seems extremely excessive.
@@lukadzidic8211 but it wasn't the faster man you fucking idiot. The only reason he got past is because the team told Mark and Sebastian to put their engines in a lower mode Sebastian ignored it, mark didn't
The suspension broke because the wheel had a flat spot because Kimi locked a wheel earlier. Therefore it was Kimi's own fault. McLaren could have called Kimi to pits but it never happened. They gambled knowing it was going to break up sooner or later. They could also have secured a good amount of points.
Why is USA 2005 included in the list ? Yes that was a terrible day for F1 in America but to say Ferrari and Bridgestone didn't deserve to to win it is unfair - they brought a safe and reliable package Michelin did not -that is not Ferraris fault. They deserved that win however hollow it may seem.
Stephen Taylor I think it falls Into the same category as '89 Japan. No disrespect to Nannini but, he wouldn't have won without extenuating circumstances
Nicholas Jonhson As an American who grew up watching NASCAR no thanks. Indy is ok but I didn't even know about F1 until a few years ago so I had a lot of catching up to do
Canada, 1973. I was there. A yellow flag brought out the safety car after a late incident in the rain (first time it was used in a GP) and it pickup up Howden Ganley....my lap charts showed Emerson Fittipaldi in the lead, and as he crossed the line, Colin Chapman threw his hat as his always did in victory...and they gave the race to Peter Revson. Scoring balls up of monumental proportions. I met Fittipaldi decades later and he was still hot about it....remembered the day with absolute clarity.
Well let's just remove them if the are appendixes. After all your appendix isn't much use in the current human system. Let's remove the stomach of the cars as well as you technically could live without a stomach and let's replace with V10 stomachs
Jochen Rindt, 1970 Monaco Grand Prix (Right man: Jack Brabham) Jackie Stewart, 1972 French Grand Prix (Right man: Chris Amon) Denny Hulme, 1973 Swedish Grand Prix (Right man: Ronnie Peterson) Ronnie Peterson, 1973 Austrian Grand Prix (Right man: Emerson Fittipaldi) Denny Hulme, 1974 Argentine Grand Prix (Right man: Carlos Reutemann) Jochen Mass, 1975 Spanish Grand Prix (Right man: Rolf Stommelen) Mario Andretti, 1977 French Grand Prix (Right man: John Watson) Ronnie Peterson, 1978 South African Grand Prix (Right man: Riccardo Patrese) Gilles Villeneuve, 1978 Canadian Grand Prix (Right man: Jean-Pierre Jarier) Alan Jones, 1980 Canadian Grand Prix (Right man: Nelson Piquet) Alain Prost, 1984 Monaco Grand Prix (Right man: Ayrton Senna) Alain Prost, 1985 Monaco Grand Prix (Right man: Michele Alboreto) Gerhard Berger, 1988 Italian Grand Prix (Right man: Ayrton Senna) Ayrton Senna, 1990 United States Grand Prix (Right man: Jean Alesi) Gerhard Berger, 1991 Japanese Grand Prix (Right man: Ayrton Senna) Johnny Herbert, 1995 Italian Grand Prix (Right man: Jean Alesi) Damon Hill, 1996 German Grand Prix: (Right man: Gerhard Berger)
How about Hamilton in Singapore 2017? Ferrari had been far better than Mercedes throughout the weekend and Hamilton only qualified fourth, with the Ferrari's and the Red Bulls in front. But the infamous 'Italian Sandwich' which took both Ferrari's and Max Verstappen out on lap 1 was a miracle for Hamilton, who ended up winning the race.
Johnny Herbert, Monza 95, who stole the Ferrari 1-2 when Alesi's onboard camera hit Berger's car. This after Coulthard, Hill and Schumacher self-destructed before mid-race, of course. But I think it should be there because of how important that result was for Ferrari, who had struggled in the past five seasons since Prost's 1990 title challenge.
Gonzalvez Alvez - 2016? Maybe. The other 2 are idiotic. 1989 - Senna needed 2 wins in the last 2 races. He crashed in the last race in Adelaide so it’s not really close in the end even if you give him Suzuka. 1994 - the only reason Hill is close is because some extreme penalties that were handed to Schumacher for minor infractions. Don’t get me wrong, Schumacher cheated that day and I would have been very happy if Hill had been crowned champion but in the context of the whole season, Schumacher was the best driver.
@@jsphblw Schumacher cheated his whole life...he has cheated even death! I get your point! But imagine if Jean Marie Balestre hadn't stole Ayrton's victory in Japan, Maybe Senna would not drive like a mad man in rage at Adelaide and would not crash with Brundle (I think). Schumacher should have been irradicated from the sport after that filthy move on Hill in Australia. I was watching live (as allways) and at that moment I could kill the cheater 2016 to me, and no one can make me think otherwise Mercedes gave the championship to another german rat only because he is German and it would go very well a german brand with a german (fake) champ. It's not easy but I hope Lewis has the strenght to reach at least 7 championship titles! Almost five!
Gonzalvez Alvez - He crashed because he couldn’t see the car ahead of him. Piquet moved over to pass Brundle. Senna thought he’d moved for him and drove into the gap and Brundle. It wouldn’t have mattered what had happened in Japan. He was unsighted at that moment. How would having Suzuka awarded to him help him see better? On the Hamilton part, I don’t agree that Mercedes cheated. But it is hard to deny that Hamilton was a much better driver than Rosberg and would have won that championship if it wasn’t for mechanical issues during the year. He should be chasing his 7th championship right now if it hadn’t been for McLaren’s idiotic call in the 2007 Chinese GP and reliability issues in 2016.
@@jsphblw Well, winning the Suzuka G.P. would not improve his eyesight but, for sure, he would be in another state of mind. But at the end you are right even if the race was awarded to him it would be dificult...but not impossible. From what I remember Prost didnt even restarted because of the rain (at Adelaide) just imagine if...I think if he would not had been robbed of the victory in japan, maybe he would drive in a diferent manner "slower" and "cautiously" and maybe he would had won the championship...it would be a nice revenge for Monaco '84!
I think there has to have had a massive crash or accident or strange circumstances that would knock the favorites for the win according to their list. Since there wasn't one, I think that it isn't included on here, because with their pace that week, many would've said before the race that Alonso would win. Whether you consider it undeserved or not is a different matter.
Senna in Monaco 1984...no reason to stop the race except the race being stopped at Prost's request by his friend Jacky Ickx, who also had other motives besides his friendship with Prost.
3:52 "Although then went on to change his story" ... He made a joke in that press conference about the dead heat, to bad english media don't know what that is yet!
2003 Brazilian GP, where Kimi was initially awarded the win after the race was red flagged because of multiple accidents, but readers of Autosport and users of their forum realised that the result had been incorrectly declared. A few days later it emerged that actually Giancarlo Fisichella had actually cross the line first on the lap that was supposed to be counted as the end of the race, and thus was awarded the win a week or so later.
That's a 50/50 blame, plus Verstappen could have easily just let Ocon go by and unlap himself, since he was on fresher rubber. Sadly it was a hard lesson that made him mature as a driver. So no, he didn't deserve that one.
Monaco's 2000 GP win for DC as MS was the dominator in qual and race opening the gap consecutively (on dry road course) by 1" per lap for the first 20 laps and abandoned the race due to a cracked exhaust that melted the suspension.
It is a mistake to mention Belgium 1998. Maybe you didn't even watched that race, maybe you were not even born by then. Damon was way faster the whole weekend. Ralf got closer just because a safety car.
I would have thought the top of the list would be Olivier Panis winning the 1996 Monaco Grand Prix in the Ligier, closely followed by Pastor Maldonado's win at the 2012 Spanish Grand Prix in the Williams which if you believe the conspiracy theorists was running illegal tyres which got destroyed in a paddock fire minutes after the race.
This criteria for most of these doesn't make sense. The wrong person won because the dominant car had an engine failure? Because faster cars forfeited? The whole point of winning a race is to FINISH the race in first place. If you don't finish then you weren't the right person to win. The one that makes sense is Alonso when he won because Renault cheated.
This would be a good time to discuss Ferraris team orders. I don't remember which race, but the one where Barichello were leading throughout and were told to move over for Schumacher. Schumacher subsequently had Barichello stand at the top of the podium and handed him the trophy. I believe Schumacher was fined for disrupting the seremony. Now THAT is a race won by the wrong driver! Edit: Austria 2002. It was a disgrace.
Hill led Schumacher by a huge distance in Spa. With fresh tyres Schumacher was quicker but Hill changed as well soon later and their pace was even again. Letting their drivers race for victory would be suicidal considering Schumacher had a reputation for collisions, including wiping Jordan out of a double podium in 1997.
Niki Lauda, Brands Hatch, 1976 James Hunt crossed the line first but was excluded due to not running the full race distance due to being launched half way into the air when clashing with Clay Reggazoni's Ferrari at the start and damaging his suspension, he then took a short cut to the pits before taking the restart - therefore shortening his race distance. The thing is Regazonni also did a similar thing and would have been excluded under the same rule, but it was only when the Ferrari number 2 retired and therefore scored no points in the Constructors' Championship that Ferrari to make a formal complaint about Hunt.
No, if someone who is investigated for a crime is not charged, all that means is there was insufficient proof. It doesn't mean they're definitely innocent, and the rest of Alonso's career, and his involvement in a number of other scandals, at other teams, suggests he probably would have known about crashgate. I mean, we're talking about the same bloke who just a year before tried to blackmail his boss by threatening to blow the whistle on the cheating that got the team into a championship contending position, and wound up costing them $100m, all because he couldn't handle being beaten by a rookie, and spat the dummy when his demands for the team to give him the advantage over his rookie team mate failed.
@@formulajuan5762 100% British. Knew It. The same people who forgot what Ron Dennis said in the 2007 chinese gp, what ended up hapenning in the leaderboard that year, and what happened in the liegate,... try to teach us law. Piquet himself said so, after telling the truth. As a reminder, the next week to that, he gave a masterclass in Fuji. So seems very unlikely that a topclass driver would want to win unfairly being capable of that. Wanker
I guess karma has already done the job for Alonso. Just look at his career since the crash. He never won another championships and he was way less wins in Ferrari than Michael Schumacher or Seb Vettel.
"Way less than Vettel" yea like total of 2 wins less. Vettel never got as close to win the title than Alonso w/ Ferrari. In fact, Vettel has had a championship calibre car 2017-18 and still failed misrably.
How about Belgium 2008, Abu Dhabi 2009, Valencia 2009, Hungary 2011, Malaysia 2012, Singapore 2012, Abu Dhabi 2012, Brazil 2012, Silverstone 2013, Monaco 2014, Monaco 2015, Malaysia 2016, Baku 2017
Hungary 2008 ,I was a 7 year old ,Ferrari fan ,and it was the first race I ever attended ,I was so heartbroken I cried 2 hours after the race and for 3 days I didn't leave my room
Yep, Alonso deserves #1 in this list at least. That cheating plan was somewhat genius but still wrong in any view you look at it. Risking the health and live of a driver in a deliberate crash to push the other is inexcusable.
That gesture by Hamilton after Baku is a great one, he's always wrongly labelled as someone who celebrates a victory that is given to him. You can tell that shit doesn't sit well with him
@@Jahanoudis clearly you weren't watching that game when you saw the way the referee treated her, so much differently than her male counterparts. It's nice to see this is who you really are, I feel much better about myself
Спорт
Charles LeClerc, 2019 Bahrain grand prix.
You mean Hamilton
@@sergiomartins98 i suppose so :)
Too soon, man. Too soon :-(
Hamilton. Leclerc deserves
It's Leclerc not LeClerc
How is Ricciardo losing his Monaco win due to the pit stop blunder not on here?
That's what I was thinking
great point. forgot about that one
Probably because Hamilton and Mercedes won it.
For sure, I remember that race, and if I had the cash to replace the TV the next day, I would have smashed my TV with a cricket bat out of pure rage at the time.
That is just racing tbh. The year before Hamilton lost Monaco in the same fashion. Led the race by half a minute over Nico but got screwed by Mercedes on the pit stop call. This is just Monaco...
I'd have put Mika Salo gifting the win to Eddie Irvine when he was filling in for injured Schumacher on this list. Would've been great to see Mika get a win and the result shows what could have been had he not been stuck with poor cars over the years. A podium was still good but he was better than Irvine on the day and the result could've reflected that.
unfortunately Mika Salo was a substitute and Edie Irvine could become world champion. so the team interest came first
Kimi in Germany 2005 last lap. Probably under breakdown vids.
Could you get any closer to a car without touching it with Button.
You can make an entire top 10 with just Kimi amd Mclaren
Both German GP's in 2005. Kimi should have won. Hockenheim and Nurburgring.
@@user-zv8qg1co4z Kimi at McLaren was the most badass driver of the 21st century. Pure speed. Pure commitment. Something like 40% of his races ended in mechanical failure though.
Ciaron Smith or he has a penalty in qualifying.
My thoughts too and it was the last corner too.
The Arrows one with Hill was properly gutting, he so deserved to win it.
My dad had a 10ner on hill to win any race that season.. I think the odds were somthing like 1000 to 1
Michael Schumacher, 2001 Spanish Grand Prix
Hakkinen had a 30 seconds lead until his engine blew up in the very last lap and MS was gifted the lead with half a lap remaining
Breakdown vid probably!
It was Hakkinens clutch that blew not his engine
@Piotr Dziadul Michael
"Valtteri, it's James" should have been first.
Mika Salo giving win for Eddie Irvine 1999 Hockenheim is the most memorable moment. Salo replaced Schumacher because of the injury. Second Ferrari race for Mika Salo and he's driving on his first win. Needed to give the win for Eddie Irvine. Salo never won after that and Irvine didn't win the champion...
Mika Häkkinen in 2001 in Spain after he started the last lap the clutch on his car broke and it gifted Schumacher the victory
Lewis Hamilton, 2019 Canada Grand Prix
Vettel made a mistake, Hamilton didn't. Simple as that.
@@oliverwatson6956 Vettel recovered and stayed in front. Simple as that.
@@ProLeopardx1
Through means of blocking... If Vettel hadn't made the mistake he wouldn't have been in that situation. Simple as that.
@@oliverwatson6956 Mistakes happen. What matters is recovery. Hamilton couldn't catch Vettel the rest of the race. Therefore Vettel won and should have gotten the trophy. Simple as that.
Oliver Watson I agree
Lewis Hamilton, 2019 Canadian Grand Prix
Shamilton
Vettel made a mistake, Hamilton didn't. Simple as that.
Oliver Watson I agree
@@oliverwatson6956 Hamilton had lots of lockups.
The true winner of Montréal to 2019 is Sebastian Vettel.
2002 Hungarian Grand Prix, where Schumacher had an insane amount of pace over Barrichello, but was told to stay behind. It is my favourite in this arena because near the end of the race Schumacher started falling behind by a rather large margin out of nowhere, making people think he suddenly had an issue with his car. And then he put the hammer down and proceeded to put in a lap over 2 seconds faster than anyone else in the whole race, showing the kind of pace and result he could have had if he hadn't been held back by team orders.
Clayton Macleod doesn’t fit with the view of Ferrari back then
I don't understand what you mean. Care to rephrase or expand?
Schumacher was in his prime, just amazing. When Nico Rosberg said he was faster than Michael I was laughing cos he was comparing himself to an older aged Schumacher then. Ter isn’t a driver since Schumacher who has shown such legendary talent.
Scumacher was told to stay behind Barrichello? That is a joke of course because the whole planet know that the opposite was happening all the time.
@ISLAMATRON nice one, i needed laugh.. thanks!!!
Lewis Hamilton, Bahrain 2019 😂
Lewis Hamilton, nearly every race so far in 2019
@@mrc14_2 Because he's won 10 so far and is 6 times WDC. Go grow a pair when you're old enough. Only lucky one was Bahrain and possibly Brazil 2018 but that's racing.
PS This video is over a year old. Probably has drivers who you've never even heard of. (Sadly I go back further than the earliest race here ! )
Stay salty kids learn to respect drivers cause you kids dont even have a chance to drive a f1 car and get paid LMAO
Hamilton is overrated. Put him in a McLaren and see how many races he wins.
@@jeremiahbachmann3901 put anyone in a McLaren and see how many races they would win
Where is 'Fernando is faster than you'?
Samool 101 Germany 2010 when Ferrari team were fined because they were not allowed to let fernando Alonso to pass Massa they should have tell fernando Alonso to stay behind Massa and let Massa take his first win in 2 years and the first time since an accident in Hungary
But Fernando was faster than him. Alonso out of respect he didn’t want to launch it into the hairpin
@@stewartgrindlay9760 If Fernando doesn’t want to overtake people maybe racing isn’t for him.
Michael Schumacher Spain 2001.
Stephen Taylor that was a last lap breakdown, they’re almost certainly saving it for another list as was stated
I was there for that race. I felt so bad Hakkinen.
Unlucky Mika in the last lap ... :|
@Jeremy Raj Australia 2000 I'll give you, but schumacher won on pace in imola and via strategy in Brazil that year so check your facts before you rant you clown
@Jeremy Raj mika was leading after schumacher made the first of 2 stops, any analysis of the pace delta shows that ferrari strategy was faster and schumacher would have won on strategy
Referring to schumacher as a nazi purely because he's German show how stupid you are
Any further remarks based on anti German bias?
"Fernando is faster than you, can you confirm you understand this message?" -- Ferrari
Alonso. German Grand Prix 2010. The infamous "Fernando is faster than you" that took that win from Massa. What many people don't say often is that it that it had been exactly one year from the accident Massa had in Hungary. That would've been a hell of way to come back for Massa. But Ferrari took it from him. And Ferrari lost the championship. Again.
ATS599 I 100% agree. Imagine how cool it would've been if Massa had won the 08 championship right after Raikkonen had it in 07. Cheers from Brazil.
That's the worst ones ever. It's much worse than what Mercedes did in Russia this year but both are still terrible
Im glad "Karma" hit then back and the reason why Vettel/Red Bull won in 2010 was that they had not used teamorders in Brazil to let Webber take the win from Vettel, despite Webber having much better chance for the championship had they done so....
However as the race turned out in Abu Dhabi, had Red Bull used team-orders in Brazil, Webber would have lost the championship to Alonso and Vettel could not have had a chance to win it either....so I was very glad that day that Ferrari lost the championship despite using team orders and Red Bull/Vettel one because they DIDNT use teamorders :D
Sure, screwing Webber strategy that had more points that Vettel in Abu Dhabi is not team orders.
gt362gamer Why the hell they would have screwed over Webber on purpose? At that point Red Bull had NO preference which driver would win the champioship….as I remember it, Webber was heavily struggling with the grip of his tyres, even brushing a wall, which why he was pitted so early. Ferrari in return decided to react on that, but forgot that left Vettel in much better position.
Anyhow Red Bull had the advantage of going to the final race with BOTH of their drivers in championship fight...usually I hear people saying this is bad thing, cause team-mates eat away points from eachother, but at that time it proved to their advantage.
And now Pat Symonds is an advisor to F1 after being banned for cheating...
Great way to maintain credibility... We've also been seeing more and more of Flavio Briatore...
same with those fined in the Spygate
I think Jacques Villeneuve should have won Australia 1996.
He was only thwarted by an oil leak, but maintained 2nd position.
This was Villeneuve's début race, and he fought off Damon Hill, despite his greater experience.
I was so impressed, that I placed my first money bet on Villeneuve!!
indeed.
I hate Damon Hill because of Spa 98.
Multi 21 and when Danny Ric was robbed at Monaco
This is one of your better videos. I totally enjoyed for some reason.
I still miss the Arrows team, a great midfield team like the Jordan team, just couldn’t get the funds
its funny they put Barrichello in the title cause he won 11 races through his f1 career
maybe because the Brits never liked Rubinho. They never liked Ayrton too except Ron Dennis who is THE real SIR!
Hope to see more memorable race videos, this is really enjoyable
Also for the Alonso part in the Singapore GP, you forgot to mention that he nearly lost his "win" when Massa could have beaten him to the restart after Piquet Jr's crash but the blunder of the light that caused Massa to launch off the pits before the refueling hose was removed caused him the lead and the whole god damn race.
I disagree with the inclusion of the Belgium Grand Prix in 1998. Damon did send a message suggesting that he and his teammate should hold station but this was only after he had waited for instructions and didn't receive any. This he points out in his recent book. Furthermore he stated quite clearly in his radio message that any decision was up to Eddie Jordan. Considering that the conditions were so bad there had been eight retirements due to crashes by this point it seemed fair that the hold station order was given and to benefit Damon who had been the fastest driver in the team that weekend up to that point
However due to the closeness of Jean Alesi in the Sauber the two Jordan's still had to race each other to the chequered flag driving so quickly that they lapped Trulli on the penultimate lap for a second time.
One final point. Whatever Ralf's demeanour on the podium might have said, he did accept the result later and wrote a nice tribute to Damon in Autosport the following year after he retired
More than that, it's often forgotten that Ralf was almost 20 seconds behind Damon until a safety car was thrown to mop up the Giancarlo Fisichella/Shinji Nakano accident at the Bus Stop. To say Ralf 'should' have won this race is disingenuous, given that he probably would not have been in a position for team orders otherwise.
Alesi should have won and probably would have if the Jordans scrapped it out. Think Hill put it as bluntly as he'll put ralf in the wall if he tries anything...
The radio broadcasts have been played out earlier this season. Whatever Damon might have said in his book; the radio transmissions don't tell the tale you have.
@@danbrayton9654 According to Hill that was just a figment of Eddie's imagination. Not really sure who to believe.
"I'm going to put something to you here, and I think you'd better listen to this, if we race, if we two race, we could end up with nothing, so it's up to Eddie, if we don't race each other, we've got an opportunity for a first and second. It's your choice,"
Damon Hill's team radio towards the end of the 1998 Belgian Grand Prix
"Ralf, you cannot overtake Damon, that's a team order,"
Eddie Jordan's order for the drivers to hold station to the end
Max Verstappen- 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix winner. Thanks a lot, FIA.
L 😂
I would put the (still) highly debated 2008 Belgian Grand Prix. Felipe Massa was definitely the wrong man who was declared the winner of that Grand Prix. Not only was Massa nowhere near battling for the lead outright, but the race should have been about the exciting battle for victory between Hamilton and Raikkonen. Hamilton made a lunge round the outside of Raikkonen, had the door closed and took to the escape road and cut the chicane to avoid a collision. Despite the fact that he let Raikkonen back through, before passing him properly shortly after, Hamilton was given a 25 second penalty which demoted him to third. Many neutral fans cried foul, as Massa was battling Hamilton for the championship, and Ferrari had got away with no penalties for other situations earlier that season, indeed Raikkonen benefitted from going off track at turn one not once but twice in that one Grand Prix
Except he came back to race in the slipstream of Raikkonen. That's not giving his position back tbh.
@@aykutdans3151 maybe, but it should have been either Raikkonen or Hamilton winning that race, Massa was nowhere near the pace of the latter two
Kimi crashed out though, so it would have been ridiculous had he won, but the penalty for Hamilton that day was harsh. I agree that up until the crash at Blanchimont it was a great drive by Kimi though; him and Hamilton going either side of Rosberg was classic stuff on a slippery track.
Revolver Ocelot - Kimi crashed so the penalty did not benefit the affected party . If they’d given him a 10 or 15 second penalty, he would have still beat the other 2. If they had given him a 20 second penalty, he would have still finished second. They gave him a 25 second penalty which is actually the same as a stop and go penalty at Spa. He passed Kimi by being close to him, not Massa. Giving him a 25 second penalty goes well beyond the bounds of fairness. Guess it all worked out because without that plenty, we wouldn’t have witnessed the greatest finish to a season.
ATS599 - Actually, there was no rule back then as to what he was supposed to do other than give back the position. It was clarified afterwards that he needed to wait a corner before attacking. But your point regarding the penalty is fair enough. My only concern is that it was a 25 second penalty instead of 10, 15 or 20 second penalty. Bumping into drivers gets you a 10 second penalty. Against this backdrop, 25 seems extremely excessive.
Michael Schumacher, Spain GP 2001
Fernando Alonso, European GP 2005
You av too finish the race 1st too win the race... you know
Multi 21
also the Hockenheim incident between the Ferraris
YES! ...Multi 21, Autosport, Multi 21!
Yea god forbid the faster man ignores team orders and wins the race AND the championship
@@lukadzidic8211 but it wasn't the faster man you fucking idiot. The only reason he got past is because the team told Mark and Sebastian to put their engines in a lower mode Sebastian ignored it, mark didn't
Fernando is faster than you (BLOODY loopholes)
Hungary 2008 still makes me sad :'( just one of so many unfortunate events when Massa has been in a dominant position
Ooh man, you've a huge list coming up to you up until now... lmao
Great content though, loved it
I guess you can add Bahrain 2019 to this list
Who is here after monza 2020 gasly win😅😂
Me
Mika Salo, Germany 1999. The one time he would ever almost win a race; except he then let Irvine through.
Half of the Irvine's victories shouldn't have happened lol
What happened to the last lap finishes video?
Why is this showed up right after the end of Bahrein Gp?🤔
Nurburgring 2005 should get a mention at least, suspension failure for kimi in the last lap
Kimi Raikkonen had to win other 2 titles!
The suspension broke because the wheel had a flat spot because Kimi locked a wheel earlier. Therefore it was Kimi's own fault. McLaren could have called Kimi to pits but it never happened. They gambled knowing it was going to break up sooner or later. They could also have secured a good amount of points.
Why is USA 2005 included in the list ? Yes that was a terrible day for F1 in America but to say Ferrari and Bridgestone didn't deserve to to win it is unfair - they brought a safe and reliable package Michelin did not -that is not Ferraris fault. They deserved that win however hollow it may seem.
Stephen Taylor I think it falls Into the same category as '89 Japan. No disrespect to Nannini but, he wouldn't have won without extenuating circumstances
Americans should stick to NASCAR and Indy. lower category series
Nicholas Jonhson As an American who grew up watching NASCAR no thanks. Indy is ok but I didn't even know about F1 until a few years ago so I had a lot of catching up to do
What does Nascar amd Indy have to do with anything?
@@PaladinNL5 everything! Because there circuits were made specifically for those series
Carlos Pace Brazilian GP 1975. That was J P Jariers's race.
Canada, 1973. I was there. A yellow flag brought out the safety car after a late incident in the rain (first time it was used in a GP) and it pickup up Howden Ganley....my lap charts showed Emerson Fittipaldi in the lead, and as he crossed the line, Colin Chapman threw his hat as his always did in victory...and they gave the race to Peter Revson. Scoring balls up of monumental proportions. I met Fittipaldi decades later and he was still hot about it....remembered the day with absolute clarity.
90s cars were so beautiful compared to today's aerodynamic appendixes
Well let's just remove them if the are appendixes.
After all your appendix isn't much use in the current human system.
Let's remove the stomach of the cars as well as you technically could live without a stomach and let's replace with V10 stomachs
Leclerc should’ve won Bahrain 2019
Feel bad for Hill being included twice, and featuring at least once more xD
Jochen Rindt, 1970 Monaco Grand Prix (Right man: Jack Brabham)
Jackie Stewart, 1972 French Grand Prix (Right man: Chris Amon)
Denny Hulme, 1973 Swedish Grand Prix (Right man: Ronnie Peterson)
Ronnie Peterson, 1973 Austrian Grand Prix (Right man: Emerson Fittipaldi)
Denny Hulme, 1974 Argentine Grand Prix (Right man: Carlos Reutemann)
Jochen Mass, 1975 Spanish Grand Prix (Right man: Rolf Stommelen)
Mario Andretti, 1977 French Grand Prix (Right man: John Watson)
Ronnie Peterson, 1978 South African Grand Prix (Right man: Riccardo Patrese)
Gilles Villeneuve, 1978 Canadian Grand Prix (Right man: Jean-Pierre Jarier)
Alan Jones, 1980 Canadian Grand Prix (Right man: Nelson Piquet)
Alain Prost, 1984 Monaco Grand Prix (Right man: Ayrton Senna)
Alain Prost, 1985 Monaco Grand Prix (Right man: Michele Alboreto)
Gerhard Berger, 1988 Italian Grand Prix (Right man: Ayrton Senna)
Ayrton Senna, 1990 United States Grand Prix (Right man: Jean Alesi)
Gerhard Berger, 1991 Japanese Grand Prix (Right man: Ayrton Senna)
Johnny Herbert, 1995 Italian Grand Prix (Right man: Jean Alesi)
Damon Hill, 1996 German Grand Prix: (Right man: Gerhard Berger)
Irvine Germany and Malaysia 1999
How about Hamilton in Singapore 2017? Ferrari had been far better than Mercedes throughout the weekend and Hamilton only qualified fourth, with the Ferrari's and the Red Bulls in front. But the infamous 'Italian Sandwich' which took both Ferrari's and Max Verstappen out on lap 1 was a miracle for Hamilton, who ended up winning the race.
Totalgamer Tb21 yes you are right.
I don't think it's a good example the incident happened like 3 seconds after the race started
It's not like baku where bottas had a puncture
That was a race incident.
hugonubario fair enough I guess that’s a good point.
Multi 21 - don’t know how you missed that one!
Johnny Herbert, Monza 95, who stole the Ferrari 1-2 when Alesi's onboard camera hit Berger's car. This after Coulthard, Hill and Schumacher self-destructed before mid-race, of course. But I think it should be there because of how important that result was for Ferrari, who had struggled in the past five seasons since Prost's 1990 title challenge.
How about F1 world championships that the wrong man won? I can think of a few :)
...1989, 1994, 2016...
Gonzalvez Alvez - 2016? Maybe. The other 2 are idiotic. 1989 - Senna needed 2 wins in the last 2 races. He crashed in the last race in Adelaide so it’s not really close in the end even if you give him Suzuka. 1994 - the only reason Hill is close is because some extreme penalties that were handed to Schumacher for minor infractions. Don’t get me wrong, Schumacher cheated that day and I would have been very happy if Hill had been crowned champion but in the context of the whole season, Schumacher was the best driver.
@@jsphblw Schumacher cheated his whole life...he has cheated even death!
I get your point! But imagine if Jean Marie Balestre hadn't stole Ayrton's victory in Japan, Maybe Senna would not drive like a mad man in rage at Adelaide and would not crash with Brundle (I think).
Schumacher should have been irradicated from the sport after that filthy move on Hill in Australia. I was watching live (as allways) and at that moment I could kill the cheater
2016 to me, and no one can make me think otherwise Mercedes gave the championship to another german rat only because he is German and it would go very well a german brand with a german (fake) champ.
It's not easy but I hope Lewis has the strenght to reach at least 7 championship titles! Almost five!
Gonzalvez Alvez - He crashed because he couldn’t see the car ahead of him. Piquet moved over to pass Brundle. Senna thought he’d moved for him and drove into the gap and Brundle. It wouldn’t have mattered what had happened in Japan. He was unsighted at that moment. How would having Suzuka awarded to him help him see better?
On the Hamilton part, I don’t agree that Mercedes cheated. But it is hard to deny that Hamilton was a much better driver than Rosberg and would have won that championship if it wasn’t for mechanical issues during the year. He should be chasing his 7th championship right now if it hadn’t been for McLaren’s idiotic call in the 2007 Chinese GP and reliability issues in 2016.
@@jsphblw Well, winning the Suzuka G.P. would not improve his eyesight but, for sure, he would be in another state of mind. But at the end you are right even if the race was awarded to him it would be dificult...but not impossible. From what I remember Prost didnt even restarted because of the rain (at Adelaide) just imagine if...I think if he would not had been robbed of the victory in japan, maybe he would drive in a diferent manner "slower" and "cautiously" and maybe he would had won the championship...it would be a nice revenge for Monaco '84!
How about the 2010 German GP?
I think there has to have had a massive crash or accident or strange circumstances that would knock the favorites for the win according to their list. Since there wasn't one, I think that it isn't included on here, because with their pace that week, many would've said before the race that Alonso would win. Whether you consider it undeserved or not is a different matter.
Can I had 1990 japanese grand prix as the grand prix that determine who's the champion?
Senna in Monaco 1984...no reason to stop the race except the race being stopped at Prost's request by his friend Jacky Ickx, who also had other motives besides his friendship with Prost.
You could probably add Senna winning at Monaco 1992, Mansell was dominanting that race until a puncture forced him to pit
3:52 "Although then went on to change his story" ... He made a joke in that press conference about the dead heat, to bad english media don't know what that is yet!
forgot Hamilton's from the Russian Grand Prix
It's not including team orders. They also left out Red Bull Multi 21 Vettel and Webber
Multi 21 is different. Webber wasn't ordered anything. Vettel was behind and ordered not to pass.
Jochen Rindt Monaco 1970.
Sir Jack Brabham leading until crashed at Gasworks Hairpin on the last lap. However he managed to finish second afterwards
I love Rubens Barrichello so much and Massa as well.
Mika Häkkinen, Barcelona 2001
Canada 2019.
2003 Brazilian GP, where Kimi was initially awarded the win after the race was red flagged because of multiple accidents, but readers of Autosport and users of their forum realised that the result had been incorrectly declared. A few days later it emerged that actually Giancarlo Fisichella had actually cross the line first on the lap that was supposed to be counted as the end of the race, and thus was awarded the win a week or so later.
Giancarlo Fisichella, 2003 Brazilian Grand Prix
Lewis Hamilton Brasil 2018, Max Verstappen was dominating until a lapped Force India (Ocon) punted him off the track.
That's a 50/50 blame, plus Verstappen could have easily just let Ocon go by and unlap himself, since he was on fresher rubber. Sadly it was a hard lesson that made him mature as a driver. So no, he didn't deserve that one.
last race in 2021 season
Bahrain 2019... definitely one of them
Monaco's 2000 GP win for DC as MS was the dominator in qual and race opening the gap consecutively (on dry road course) by 1" per lap for the first 20 laps and abandoned the race due to a cracked exhaust that melted the suspension.
Lewis Hamilton: Great Britain 2014, Monaco 2016, Baku 2018, Russia 2018, Bahrain 2019, Canada 2019....
UPDATED
Brazil gp 2018
Silverstone 2014? Why? The rest I kinda agree with, except maybe Monaco
there were even more wins that lewis should have won, but didnt because of unlucky moments
@@blaise2833
Rosberg had him well beaten before his car failed
It is a mistake to mention Belgium 1998. Maybe you didn't even watched that race, maybe you were not even born by then. Damon was way faster the whole weekend. Ralf got closer just because a safety car.
Hill also had a puncture.
Well said! Shouldn’t be on here
2005 Nurburgring Fernando Alonso ...Kimi lost a win in the last lap.. 2001 Barcelona Michael Schumacher ...Mika lost win in the last Lap...
I would have thought the top of the list would be Olivier Panis winning the 1996 Monaco Grand Prix in the Ligier, closely followed by Pastor Maldonado's win at the 2012 Spanish Grand Prix in the Williams which if you believe the conspiracy theorists was running illegal tyres which got destroyed in a paddock fire minutes after the race.
MULTI 21 ??
Webber & vettell
Actually, the right man won, because Vettel raced and denied team orders who are ruining the sport.
Explaine why this was WRONG? Multi 21 was teamorder to keep position
It's Vettel, pronounced like "Fat-L" with emphasis on "fat". (lol)
This criteria for most of these doesn't make sense. The wrong person won because the dominant car had an engine failure? Because faster cars forfeited? The whole point of winning a race is to FINISH the race in first place. If you don't finish then you weren't the right person to win.
The one that makes sense is Alonso when he won because Renault cheated.
This would be a good time to discuss Ferraris team orders. I don't remember which race, but the one where Barichello were leading throughout and were told to move over for Schumacher. Schumacher subsequently had Barichello stand at the top of the podium and handed him the trophy. I believe Schumacher was fined for disrupting the seremony. Now THAT is a race won by the wrong driver!
Edit: Austria 2002. It was a disgrace.
Hill led Schumacher by a huge distance in Spa. With fresh tyres Schumacher was quicker but Hill changed as well soon later and their pace was even again. Letting their drivers race for victory would be suicidal considering Schumacher had a reputation for collisions, including wiping Jordan out of a double podium in 1997.
Niki Lauda, Brands Hatch, 1976
James Hunt crossed the line first but was excluded due to not running the full race distance due to being launched half way into the air when clashing with Clay Reggazoni's Ferrari at the start and damaging his suspension, he then took a short cut to the pits before taking the restart - therefore shortening his race distance.
The thing is Regazonni also did a similar thing and would have been excluded under the same rule, but it was only when the Ferrari number 2 retired and therefore scored no points in the Constructors' Championship that Ferrari to make a formal complaint about Hunt.
hamilton brazil 2018
hamilton monaco 2016
hamilton bahrain 2019
hamilton russia 2018
Massa Spa 2008
Kimi in Brazil when he actually won and then they retrospectively changed the rules? Or Mika Salo denied his only victory?
Not surprised to find canada 2019 in the comments. I think you guys need a v2 of this vid autosport
Hamilton Spa 2008 is missing. Great video though
Senna Monaco 1992.
That was just an awesome race, Senna was just really good defending and Monaco *is* hard to overtake on.
Add Lewis Hamilton, 2019 Canadian GP. Stewards stole it from Seb.
Pironi wasn’t killed in zolda, however sadly, on August 23, 1987, he died at age 35 whilst taking part in a powerboat race.
Assisti ao GP da Hungria de 97 e realmente foi muito triste o final sem Hill/Arrows como vencedores.
Schumacher in Austria 2002 - should have been Barrichello
Massa in Belgium 2008 - should have been Hamilton
There was no Austrian Grand Prix in 2005, did you mean 2002?
I think he means America, the 6 car race.
SiVlog yep I meant 2002!
Belgium 2008. Is that the one where Hamilton fucks Kimi over? Cause they were goddamn right to strip that win from him.
funny you mention Austria 2002...and spa 08...but not Sochi 2018
Singapore 2008 should be revoked from Alonso's record. He clearly knew about the plan beforehand and it's an utter disgrace that result still stands.
He was investigated. If nothing ever happened is because he wasn't part of it. Piquet jr himself said so.
No, if someone who is investigated for a crime is not charged, all that means is there was insufficient proof. It doesn't mean they're definitely innocent, and the rest of Alonso's career, and his involvement in a number of other scandals, at other teams, suggests he probably would have known about crashgate. I mean, we're talking about the same bloke who just a year before tried to blackmail his boss by threatening to blow the whistle on the cheating that got the team into a championship contending position, and wound up costing them $100m, all because he couldn't handle being beaten by a rookie, and spat the dummy when his demands for the team to give him the advantage over his rookie team mate failed.
@@formulajuan5762 100% British. Knew It. The same people who forgot what Ron Dennis said in the 2007 chinese gp, what ended up hapenning in the leaderboard that year, and what happened in the liegate,... try to teach us law.
Piquet himself said so, after telling the truth. As a reminder, the next week to that, he gave a masterclass in Fuji. So seems very unlikely that a topclass driver would want to win unfairly being capable of that. Wanker
I guess karma has already done the job for Alonso. Just look at his career since the crash. He never won another championships and he was way less wins in Ferrari than Michael Schumacher or Seb Vettel.
"Way less than Vettel" yea like total of 2 wins less. Vettel never got as close to win the title than Alonso w/ Ferrari. In fact, Vettel has had a championship calibre car 2017-18 and still failed misrably.
Havent watched the video yet but i already know that schumi and bariccello are on here
Keep making video 👍 you doing great now
Here’s a few more.
Hamilton: Germany 2018
Hamilton: Russia 2018
Hamilton: Bahrain 2019
Hamilton: Canada 2019
How about Belgium 2008, Abu Dhabi 2009, Valencia 2009, Hungary 2011, Malaysia 2012, Singapore 2012, Abu Dhabi 2012, Brazil 2012, Silverstone 2013, Monaco 2014, Monaco 2015, Malaysia 2016, Baku 2017
@@ksfreestylers1146 Button won Brazil 2012 while Hamilton DNF
Hahaha salty salty
Lewis Hamilton, 2018 brazilian grand prix
didnt verstappen come 2nd?
@@PozzAFC That's the idea. Verstappen should've been 1st
How did Spain 2001 not make the list?
Hakkinen winning by over 40 seconds when his engine blew on the very last lap
Hungary 2008 ,I was a 7 year old ,Ferrari fan ,and it was the first race I ever attended ,I was so heartbroken I cried 2 hours after the race and for 3 days I didn't leave my room
Yep, Alonso deserves #1 in this list at least. That cheating plan was somewhat genius but still wrong in any view you look at it. Risking the health and live of a driver in a deliberate crash to push the other is inexcusable.
its not his fault tho
Came here looking for Hamilton at Canada 2019, didn't take me long haha
Mika Hakkinen 98 oz GP? DC gave up the win to honor their gentleman's agreement.
I feel bad for Alessandro Nannini lmaoooooo his only win and hes on the list lol
That gesture by Hamilton after Baku is a great one, he's always wrongly labelled as someone who celebrates a victory that is given to him. You can tell that shit doesn't sit well with him
Luca Munro was the same at the Russian GP, he basically didn’t celebrate that at all
Bullshit, he enjoyed every second. The guy is so fake
@@Jahanoudis Yeah you keep telling yourself that mate, if it makes up for your own shortcomings in life
@@Jahanoudis clearly you weren't watching that game when you saw the way the referee treated her, so much differently than her male counterparts. It's nice to see this is who you really are, I feel much better about myself
Hamilton Monaco 2016, Germany 2018, Baku 2018, Russia 2018, Bahrain 2019, Canada 2019
Yep
Irivine in Austria 1999, this could and should have been Mika Salo’s win and he would have so much deserved it.
Flavio Briatore was not lying when he said he was not involved in crashgate! It was just Pat Simmonds.
Lewis hamilton, canada 2019
Sebastian Vettel, 2019 Canadian Grand Prix
ShineStreet fUcK oFf, stupid hamilton fans
1996 German Grand Prix Damon Hill won after Gerhard Berger's engine blew up after he led most of the race with only a few laps left.
Esteban Ocon at the Hungaroring in 2021.
As simple as that.