The combustion engine has evolved a lot over the last 100 years, and is much more efficient and refined these days. It is also a lot more complicated. It makes the relative simplicity of an induction AC motor much more attractive as a source of drive. The limitation being the high voltage traction battery technology, which now needs the focus of research and development.
Audi engineers... let's install the combine the cam cover and cam bearing housing, to make sure the consumer pay for a new set of cams and a cam cover!!
My Jetta 2016 1.4 tsi with 35k miles is doing great in the gas averaging 45 miles x gallon. I got the car used for about 10 thousands dollars in January 2019 the car was a lease before i got it, The over engineering of this engine has pros n cons, Pros gas mileage, turbo engine is more powerful vs compacts cars in the segment, construction is tight no squeaks, sporty driving dynamics. The cons even changing the air filter is a pain in the ass, and when maintenance problems arise could be a money pit but remember buy used with low miles after all the initial cost of the car was cheap
Yeah, great job by Ralph Schmidt. We must make sure the engineers get credit. They are the heart and soul of the design.m (i'm not related to Rick Reid of the adjacent comment, just coincidence :-)). Question: what changed from 1.4 TSI to 1.4 FTSI ?
do you keep this guy in a box ,because he said he never heard about a timing chain being stretched .and the chain is life time guaranteed this in a parallel univers but not here not now
I have the same problem with my golf mk5 gt tsi 1.4 chain tension went I change it I change chain too and it was stretch as well the valve change too and air test the piston head and the car still not starting am so angry mash up nuff money trying to fix it and no joy only thing I can do is change engine even that the engine are too much money they want £1.800 or £2.000 or £3.000 I was like what the hell engine cost more than my car I could believe it mate I tell yh
Hi My car (1.4 tsi golf mk5 66000 miles) is showing error p3008. Initially the error code p000A appeared. I changed camshaft sensor then code p3008 came up. Most of the people are saying that timing chain needs to replace. It was fine , I just changed water pump because it was leaking, and new drive belts, with engine oil service , dsg service & spark plugs. After all this work when I started my car a code p000A appeared, then changed camshaft sensor, camshaft adjuster valve, after 5 minutes a new code p3008 came up, car starts but idle rough. When press acceleration it vibrates very heavily. What do you think might be the problem?
I realise this answer is too late for you but for anyone else with this problem, it's likely to be valve timing, caused by a stretched timing chain or it could be a worn out camshaft/cam followers, if you've eliminated everything else as outlined in this original post..
Peter Shaw hi, thanks for your reply. It was the timing issue. Which was caused by very loose tensioner, due to which chain jumped a couple of tooth and timing went out. I replaced the chain & tensioner and car running fine since then...
Hi, I have an Audi Q3 Sportback 2020 model with the 1.4T TFSI Engine. Is this the same sort of engine as this? If so, I’m not sure how reliable it will be.
i had to replace timing chain (whole set) , ignition coil packs (second time so far), internal leaking high pressure fuel pump and clean carbon build up from intake valves because of misfires, and decreased power. @ 62k miles / 100k km. Soon i will have to change water coolant pump because of the squeaky compressors electromagnetic cluch pulley... A fail engine with serious design flaws and low quality parts. Endless money pits...
JA FRITZ, DAS IST GUT MOTOR, JA, JA ... Lügen wieder erzählen? Next time incorporate the sprocket with the crankshaft, it will be even more expensive and will shorten the engine's lifespan to 50.000k so you can sell more "cheap" "Volksautos" with chains stretching which can't even meet the normal BELT lifespan. Also, super expensive parts, super complicated service- like you couldn't make it even more difficult and expensive? WHY DO YOU EVEN BOTHER WITH CHAINS??? I CAN'T UNDERSTAND. BELT IS MUCH FASTER TO CHANGE AND MUCH CHEAPER!! Personally, I wouldn't risk but Citroen claims their belt service should be carried on every 180.000-240.000 km !!! Again WHY WOULD YOU BOTHER WITH CHAINS THAT CAN NOT EVEN LAST 60.000km or in many cases less??? Shuldigung Fritz, I forgot to mention OIL CONSUMPTION- I believe TSI and TFSI engines consume more oil over 1000km than Trabant.
It's a real shame that Audi have designed a valve train drive system with defective tensioner and cheap and nasty components that results in failure after as little as 30 000 km. The world is full of failed cam chain tensioners in the vw audi seat range. The days of German reliability has clearly gone. Come on Audi....dont let the accountants rule design and stop sub contracting manufacture of plastic rubbish in China
If the standard map wasn't so god damn lean there wouldn't have been as many problems. This engine runs super hot and doesn't tolerate long oil change intervals or substandard fuel. It also requires a lot of preventative maintenance to run reliably
@@JG-ge3ui well, given it is a timing chain, not a belt, it should have been stronger. Also, you are one case, maybe lucky. It depends on the year also. After 2011 they revised the timing parts. All in all, a timing belt is longer lasting which is not right
I really enjoyed this in depth look at the 1.4 engine. Ralph S. does a great job. I learned a lot. Thanks for posting this informative video!
"Here is the intake manifold, it's made of plastic." Alarm bells, alarm bells, alarm bells
For those who're curious to know, this video is from 2008 (as mentioned in the part 2 video).
The combustion engine has evolved a lot over the last 100 years, and is much more efficient and refined these days. It is also a lot more complicated. It makes the relative simplicity of an induction AC motor much more attractive as a source of drive. The limitation being the high voltage traction battery technology, which now needs the focus of research and development.
Audi engineers... let's install the combine the cam cover and cam bearing housing, to make sure the consumer pay for a new set of cams and a cam cover!!
My Jetta 2016 1.4 tsi with 35k miles is doing great in the gas averaging 45 miles x gallon. I got the car used for about 10 thousands dollars in January 2019 the car was a lease before i got it,
The over engineering of this engine has pros n cons, Pros gas mileage, turbo engine is more powerful vs compacts cars in the segment, construction is tight no squeaks, sporty driving dynamics. The cons even changing the air filter is a pain in the ass, and when maintenance problems arise could be a money pit but remember buy used with low miles after all the initial cost of the car was cheap
26:17 “this one matches” that’s why the tool was held in place lol
hello, after hitting the valves on the camshaft, did the lobes shift?
Do you have more video service training. Ilyas tv. 2008 Toyota yaris .1.5l
.
Will Audi replace the timing chain on my son's A3 or will they rip him off.
Yeah, great job by Ralph Schmidt. We must make sure the engineers get credit. They are the heart and soul of the design.m (i'm not related to Rick Reid of the adjacent comment, just coincidence :-)). Question: what changed from 1.4 TSI to 1.4 FTSI ?
BS change one of those today and the intake side jumped 3 teeth, (crap tensioner)had to replace whole set. And already did 12 this year alone
How much does it cost?
boa explicação vai Like e +1 inscrito
do you keep this guy in a box ,because he said he never heard about a timing chain being stretched .and the chain is life time guaranteed this in a parallel univers but not here not now
I agree. Ralph must be on drugs. A lot of 1.4 TSI 140/170 HP engines has stretched timing chains
I have the same problem with my golf mk5 gt tsi 1.4 chain tension went I change it I change chain too and it was stretch as well the valve change too and air test the piston head and the car still not starting am so angry mash up nuff money trying to fix it and no joy only thing I can do is change engine even that the engine are too much money they want £1.800 or £2.000 or £3.000 I was like what the hell engine cost more than my car I could believe it mate I tell yh
Ralph says "I know nothing"
It was a total construction fail. They have still big problems with this.
This guy had never heard about it as it had probably never happened when this video was made. Around 2008 I guess.
Will the T10171A be available after Brexit
Very nice!
Why it's that tfsi thermometer nd water pump leak fast
Hi
My car (1.4 tsi golf mk5 66000 miles) is showing error p3008. Initially the error code p000A appeared. I changed camshaft sensor then code p3008 came up. Most of the people are saying that timing chain needs to replace. It was fine , I just changed water pump because it was leaking, and new drive belts, with engine oil service , dsg service & spark plugs. After all this work when I started my car a code p000A appeared, then changed camshaft sensor, camshaft adjuster valve, after 5 minutes a new code p3008 came up, car starts but idle rough. When press acceleration it vibrates very heavily. What do you think might be the problem?
I realise this answer is too late for you but for anyone else with this problem, it's likely to be valve timing, caused by a stretched timing chain or it could be a worn out camshaft/cam followers, if you've eliminated everything else as outlined in this original post..
Peter Shaw hi, thanks for your reply. It was the timing issue. Which was caused by very loose tensioner, due to which chain jumped a couple of tooth and timing went out. I replaced the chain & tensioner and car running fine since then...
I had no idea the 1.4 TSI is this old. It’s a relatively new engine in the US market. But I think it’s the newer version with aluminum block.
This is the chain driven turbo/supercharged engine, not the newer turbo only 1.4 (with a timing belt)
@@eponymous7910 do you know the year of production of that types of engines? Are they based on this engine?
anything below 2009 and to 2014 , u can refer to the chassis code first few numbers
What year is the engine from
Bloody good info from ze German's 👌🏼
Very very good
Hi, I have an Audi Q3 Sportback 2020 model with the 1.4T TFSI Engine. Is this the same sort of engine as this? If so, I’m not sure how reliable it will be.
This engine has a cam chain and this was very problematic on this engine .
Your engine has a cam belt and seems like a good motor Ea211.
@@juliangedzierski2546 oh awesome, thanks heaps 🤙
Is this the same 1.4 engine as the 2019 jetta?
No, these were all discontinued years ago
I need part 2 please
Part 2 please
This needed a Eurotrash style English dubbing
How can i see the original video with german language please , because i understand german better than english
i had to replace timing chain (whole set) , ignition coil packs (second time so far), internal leaking high pressure fuel pump and clean carbon build up from intake valves because of misfires, and decreased power. @ 62k miles / 100k km.
Soon i will have to change water coolant pump because of the squeaky compressors electromagnetic cluch pulley...
A fail engine with serious design flaws and low quality parts. Endless money pits...
Age and type of car?
Just replaced another water pump, kompressor belt + drive belt on my twincharged mk6. That's twice in 9 odd years. These engines are soooo finicky
I have this motor sinc 2012. I've changed 3 chain and 5 tensioner. Worst motor I've owned 😶👍
In other words stay away from these engines 😂😂
Exactly
Yes far away
JA FRITZ, DAS IST GUT MOTOR, JA, JA ...
Lügen wieder erzählen?
Next time incorporate the sprocket with the crankshaft, it will be even more expensive and will shorten the engine's lifespan to 50.000k so you can sell more "cheap" "Volksautos" with chains stretching which can't even meet the normal BELT lifespan. Also, super expensive parts, super complicated service- like you couldn't make it even more difficult and expensive? WHY DO YOU EVEN BOTHER WITH CHAINS??? I CAN'T UNDERSTAND. BELT IS MUCH FASTER TO CHANGE AND MUCH CHEAPER!! Personally, I wouldn't risk but Citroen claims their belt service should be carried on every 180.000-240.000 km !!! Again WHY WOULD YOU BOTHER WITH CHAINS THAT CAN NOT EVEN LAST 60.000km or in many cases less???
Shuldigung Fritz, I forgot to mention OIL CONSUMPTION- I believe TSI and TFSI engines consume more oil over 1000km than Trabant.
I really love your comments, so true ! I d drive a trabbant any day ,so simple and with amazing character. 👍👍
Tsi
4:31 Plastic wtf why using plastic, whats wrong with metals, this engine is not made to run for year and many kilometers
Cos'è il solito motore di merda?
The guy in the suit has no clue what the expert is talking about.
It's a real shame that Audi have designed a valve train drive system with defective tensioner and cheap and nasty components that results in failure after as little as 30 000 km. The world is full of failed cam chain tensioners in the vw audi seat range. The days of German reliability has clearly gone. Come on Audi....dont let the accountants rule design and stop sub contracting manufacture of plastic rubbish in China
The CAXA engine is maybe one of the VW group's worst engines. Expect to do a timing chain and tensioner replacement as soon as 50 000 km.
Probably one of the weakest poorly designed engines ever made.
If the standard map wasn't so god damn lean there wouldn't have been as many problems. This engine runs super hot and doesn't tolerate long oil change intervals or substandard fuel. It also requires a lot of preventative maintenance to run reliably
Edward H hollow cams that warp, cam chains that stretch! Stay well clear
Shitty engine, bad timing chain design, eats oil, fuel consumption is high.
Vlad Mihai interesting. Mine has 60k miles and burns no oil and I get 39 mpg 🤷♂️
@@JG-ge3ui well, given it is a timing chain, not a belt, it should have been stronger. Also, you are one case, maybe lucky. It depends on the year also. After 2011 they revised the timing parts. All in all, a timing belt is longer lasting which is not right