2019 Chevrolet Colorado vs. Ford Ranger Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Today, it’s time for another Ford vs. Chevy shootout, but rather than comparing half-ton pickups we’re looking at each brand’s midsize offering, comparably equipped versions of the 2019 Ford Ranger FX4 and 2019 Chevrolet Colorado Z71. We’ll take a look at the specs of both and then put them through some real-world tests to see what kind of fuel economy they get in our mileage test, how well they ride in our stability test, and what kind of acceleration they have both loaded and unloaded in our 0-60 test.
Read more at: www.autoguide....
Get a free price quote: quotes.autogui...
#FordRanger #ChevroletColorado #ComparisonAG
Please show your support and subscribe!
www.youtube.com...
AutoGuide reviews the latest new cars with test drives, car comparisons and shootouts plus coverage of breaking auto industry news, auto shows, rumors, top 10 lists, and spy photos. Help shop for your new car with informative car buying tips and car recall news, and be entertained with feature stories, Top 10s and car review videos.
I have a 2019 Colorado and love it. Never had a problem with the brake pedal, great acceleration, handling, stopping.
agreed, do you have the variable v6? very rarely do I see it in 4 cylinder mode
Not mentioned: the Ranger's rear seat back folds down in a single piece, and doesn't fold flat. So no passengers if you need to fold it. The Colorado's is a 60-40 split, so you can carry cargo and passengers at the same time.
That’s what a truck bed is for
But the Colorado is shit with shit parts
@@TheOne_p shut up
@@TheOne_p 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@TheOne_p you must think never had one because they are good trucks
The sarcastic "plug" for Sysco at the end was HILARIOUS!
And as a Sysco driver, what he said was all true. Whatever you need, wherever it goes, we get it done. No driveway, No problem. Lol
Amazes me how big these "Small" Trucks really are. The original Mini's were just that. MINI. Meant to be 3rd Vehicles for those who didn't need a Full size and priced accordingly. Damn shame there is nothing offered anymore.
True. But have you noticed how the midsized trucks are getting much bigger as well? They are trying to keep it to scale
The reason is do to the tec and safety that's stuffed under the fenders panels and dash to bad they didn't offer a single cab Colorado like the s10 version or the luv
@@mr.merica6048 I agree. I would like a single cab with 8 foot bed.
Smart fortwo
100% agree!
I work at a Ford dealership and have driven many Rangers, and I just bought a new Colorado Z71 last fall. This comparison is pretty much spot on with what I think of them. The Ranger seats are way more comfortable, I like the torque from the EcoBoost and its nicely mated to the 10-speed, the SYNC 3 system is great to use, but man the ride/handling on that thing is so bad, it kind of reminds me of my bro's old Cutlass Ciera (which I hated). The Colorado rides/handles great for a truck, feels nimble and planted, I strongly prefer the interior layout, I kind of like the styling better, and honestly I do like the V6, I think it'll age better than the turbocharged EcoBoost. Glad I went with the Chevy overall. Also I took that ridiculous air dam off and installed some proper skid plates underneath the front, I'm consistently averaging 25-26 mpg driving mostly on 40-50 mph backroads.
Glad to hear your real-world experience matches up with mine! Despite being a few years older, the Colorado feels like a better truck.
- Craig
My Colorado also gets better gas mileage than the Ford around 23 average. I have the LT with the air dam which is cool with me. Just a city truck anyways. What you said is spot on.
@@AutoGuide love your videos keep it up!
Nah the ride thing here way overstated I think the Ranger is just so good overall ya gotta try find a major fault. Not happening fellas! Its leaps & bounds better than rest. Oh an minor reflash bring up MPGs a bit. I'm very happy with my '19 Ranger XLT FX4 crew..black on black ...& mean! Livernoismotorsports.com shipping me a tune w/80hp more. Try that in a taco or 'rado!
@@BrD4GOD the American midsize trucks are best an no surprise! The Colorado is a nice truck but next to this new Ranger its outclassed badly. I drove em all too & handling thing a few here saying way overstated. Ranger is phenom in its 1st yr! Wait till another 2! Till then loving my new black on black Ranger XLT FX4.
I don't understand why automakers do not make column mounted shifters on smaller cars and trucks to make more space in front anymore.
My 83 Malibu was a column shift and it had a massive front seat with the extra room.
Ben Covington
Didn’t know the Malibu ever had a column shifter. All I remember was the recent 2012 one was the last with it. Too bad Impala removed the option!
Ben Covington
That must be nice 👍🏻
It’s the primary reason I can’t fit in most cars anymore. At 6’3” my right knee is in agony, especially in the Colorado.
BigBossIvan
Do you think front bench seats will return? I remember my dad had a 04 Escape and I got to drive it too. It had a column shifter and open room for the knees. Got rid of it because of rust and my mom complaining. I wish we still had it. Now we have a new Escape. I like the first gen one better because of the column shifter.
I really enjoyed you guys displaying the origin of the parts... I found it very interesting and hope you keep doing this. 👍
A $3000 price difference is pretty serious. Also, given your conclusion, it makes me curious how the little diesel in a Colorado would stack up in the same comparison.
Overall, I appreciate the balanced, fair review you gave. I'm interested in midsize trucks for my next ride, and reviews like these help give me insight to guide my purchase decision.
Bought a 19 ranger xlt. Loving it so far! I loved that it came with a lot of standard safety features that the other mid size trucks charge extra for. And the 2.3 EcoBoost is awesome! It definitely does the job. Hopefully ford will somehow add the 2.7 EcoBoost down the road. It handles awesome too! Price wasn’t bad either. With rebates the dealer had it at $25,101. But my payoff is only more cause I owed money on my trade😅🤷♂️.
Lol same with me got me down to 28 grand my ranger is a 2wd
I want a 2020 one but idk if i shiuld chose a colorado or the ranger haha
@@mvally2714 I would just wait for the 2023 ranger honestly.
I’m looking to get a Ranger. How is your truck holding up?
@@patrickreynolds6861 I traded it in at 53,000 miles. It was a good truck! No issues when I had it. My only complaint is there are full size trucks that get better mpg and fuel range. The 18 gallon tank is too small. Traded it in for a 22 pathfinder
I have a 16' Colorado with about 51k on it same v6 engine. Life time fuel economy I have is 23.5 and that is prob a 60/40 highway to city driving.
I have the 2021 Ranger and i can say without doubt, I prefer it over the Chevy. At 70 MPH I average 22 MPG both on the panel and hand checked. At 2K miles now, I am getting up to 24 in town. I do agree with your assessment of the Climate controls being small, but those controls are not primary, primary controls are on the screen. The wife commented how smooth the truck was and not bouncy. My F250 was bouncy without a load. The seats are much more comfortable than the Chevy. I also agree with the brakes sponginess, took me awhile to get used to it. I would have gone with the Chevy, but i have more respect for myself than that. I think at the end of the day , it all boils down to if you want a truck to carry stuff like tools and small farm equipment in the ford or you want to carry Flower bouquets in the back of the chevy.
Owned my Colorado since 2015.
Has 96k on it. Only had 1 sensor go bad. Chevy fixed it free. Runs like a top, and has gotten me out of crappy situations.My first new vehicle and I love it today like the first time I drove it. My little daughters love it. They call it "daddy's truck" :) my 6 year old already asked me if she can have it for her first vehicle lol.
Loyal Chevy fanboy for sure.
Old Chevy, s never die
All good till the frame rots out!
@@timcheek5134 hopefully not. But I've been working in fabrication for 10+ years. If so hopefully I can address it on the cheap.
150k miles now.
Colorado all day 👍👍💪
Just bought a 2019 ranger, it comfortable, fast (for a 4 banger) and I love driving it. gas milage ain't great but it's not an issue for me. I would absolutely recommend this truck
Get the new Ford Performance tune, hugh gains.
Went with the Chevy Z71. Very pleased with the look and performance.
I did too. And through on a Mallet stage 2 supercharger. Absolutely worth it. No way I'm paying $45k for a 4 cylinder even if it has a turbo.
@@wilsterone6689 I personally don't care. I won't use too much power. Worst thing I'll use my truck for is towing my travel trailer around but it's pretty lite so it won't take that much power. I also wanna offroad and 4 cylinders are better for offroading and gas mileage
I have gotten an average of 23.7 mpg over the last over 8,000 miles in my Colorado Z71! With the air dam removed and OEM ZR2 style skids installed. Not bad!
At 8 minutes in I could tell by your voice you we going to pick Colorado.
I could tell that by the first 30 seconds.
Test drove them both, purchased the Ranger because I generally buy Ford, well, 3,000mi later I'm disappointed ! Truck is getting 17mpg out of a 4-cylinder !!! In dash screen is 1/2 the size of the Canyon's and smaller than my cell phones. Did anyone mention changing oil ? You have to take it to the ford dealership EVERY time because they have to take 1/2 the fender off to remove the filter !!! Great engineering there !
@@daghostxxx1797 sold my ranger for a 2021 ram 1500 with the 5.7 hemi, since they get the same gas mileage somehow...
@@Xcarson122 it's because of the turbos on the ranger.
@@interceptingfist5682 agreed
Just bought a 2019 Ford Ranger XLT Sport with Sync 3 technology. Did not purchase the FX4 off road package because the truck will not see any real off-road action, mostly hauling, towing and camping while still being my day to day city driving work truck. So far I love the turbo charged I4 engine very responsive and it has the start/stop technology which lends to decent city driving fuel economy. I'm a Ford guy but I did check out the Chevy Colorado and I just liked the Ranger in terms of looks, ride quality and the engine was a slam dunk for me. No doubt the Colorado is a nice mid-size truck but for me it's the Ford Ranger.
I prefer the looks and ride height of the Ranger too. I also like the turbo engine... if I need the extra power I will accept the poor fuel economy trade off. If I don't, I can stay out of the throttle and maybe do a little better than the epa numbers. I don't know what went on with this guy's fuel numbers... unless he was leaning on the thing way hard, there's no way it should have that high fuel consumption.
As ever, personal preferences make vehicle buying a hard choice... but I agree, for me it would be the Ranger supercab 4wd.
I like both , but i prefer the Colorado with the D-Max . It gets awesome mileage and is great on trails !
I have a 2014 Ranger Wildtrack 4x4 here in Thailand and love it. It rides well, drives well, and runs very well. No complaints what so ever with the 3.2 L diesel.
Nobody noticed the iPhone he was trying to wirelessly charge didn’t support wireless charging???😂
You need to plug in to use Android Auto--not sure about Carplay. So what's the point of wireless?
@@karykrismer1448 Its just handy to charge your phone or a passengers. Most people dont use android auto or apple auto all the time so plugging in just to charge is an inconvenience compared to the wireless base. It's nice to have wireless charging but they should have made sure the popular phones were able to fit.
That must be quite an old phone unless Apple was that behind on wireless charging tech.
@@Wallriss Except that a passenger can use their phone while it's charging if using a cable, and it will charge much faster (assuming a Snapdragon Quickcharge system--which annoyingly the Chevy plug-ins are not! Not sure any Android Auto are.)
@@Wallriss I no longer follow iPhones, and never followed Wireless charging, but Apple has not been a leader in providing features since before the Samsung Galaxy S4. LTE, Bluetooth, NFC and even something as simple as larger screens they were well behind the pack (and in the case of Bluetooth and NFC crippled the technology to some extent).
I bought my 2019 Chevrolet Colorado LT 3.6 V6 Extended Cab 4x4 last March. It's the newest model vehicle in my possession & so far, it's been majorly pleasurable. My dad's side of the family has included a consistent portion of Ford drivers (including myself). One of the last trucks I had in possession was a 2007 Ford Ranger regular cab 4 cylinder. That truck wasn't 4x4 but still had its own share held. Even during the time I had that truck, I've been saying that my goal was if/when I had the ability getting another truck in the future regardless that was another Ford if not a Chevrolet or Toyota Tacoma...The significant aspect goal was to make sure having 4x4. The Colorado came with a bed liner & cover along with being a extended cab which I'm a fan of. Two prime examples of me getting good use of the Colorado are doing a quick test run with the 4 wheel drive the first night I brought it home. The second is the weekend before Thanksgiving, I used the truck to go on my first vacation in several years which was an overnight road trip. New Year's Eve, my dad bought his 2020 Ford Ranger XL Super Cab (Extended Cab) 4x4. That truck was the first brand new vehicle my father bought in 18 years. I have driven it a few times & personally, I think it's pretty much about as cool as my Colorado. What I find unfortunate is that both Ford & GM made the decision to end having extended cab designs for their midsize trucks in 2023 & 2024. Because now if you want a brand-new Ford truck with an extended cab, you have to get a F-150 as the first available option.
I have a 2019 Ranger and the only thing I agree with AutoGuide is the fuel economy. also disappointed that ford didn't gave us a manual transmission.
Me to
As an employee at the Wentzville plant thank you for choosing our Colorado.
Also just chose a Z71 Trail Runner Edition from your plant. Love it so far.
The manual transmission on the Colorado solid bro?
@@netwak how much did you pay for it?
Since you work at the Wentzville plant, should I get the updated 2021 version or wait until the 2022 for a possible redesigned model?
@@ChrisBanks211 I'd rather not post in the comments, ha, ha. you can msg me?
All these people saying they like the Colorado better but the Rangers selling better lol I got a 2019 XLT and I love it. Where my ranger homies at?!?!
Ry C Absolutely love mine
Just got a 2020 XLT today, awesome
The ranger is selling better? Show me proof.
@@andybub45 just google it, they show the yearly sales for this year, rangers winning
I have a Ford Escape Titanium, girlfriend has a Colorado. I am lucky to get 22 no matter what speed I drive. We towed a trailer to Northern Michigan with her Colorado and got slightly over 25 mpg. Mine is a 4 cylinder Turbo, hers a V6.
I have a 2019 Chevy Colorado, and I’m in love with my truck! I got the base model so it’s nothing fancy, but even base model is pretty nice. My center console is huge! I have so much storage to put my wallet or phone anywhere. I would say the only thing that bugs me is the back seats. I feel like people don’t really enjoy being in the back, it’s small and looks uncomfortable. My truck didn’t come with a bed liner so I had to get one myself. I did get a base model so that’s my fault. But the engine is amazing!! It’s a v6 but feels like a v8 when I’m on the highway passing people. I would say overall I love my Colorado, and I wouldn’t trade it in for anything. Plus I got 7,000lbs of bitches I can haul😏
Goochrider oh ya man it’s much nicer! But my v6 has good pick up
Any random p0651 codes...
fishstick8888 not that I’m aware of
@@josephsicilia9013 i was getting random p0651 and going into limp mode. Truck would just shut off ... ended up being spark plug wires where arching against the block
fishstick8888 holy crap man hope everything goes well!
These trucks are available in Australia but only in Deisel options, the Ranger has a 3.2l 5cyl option (not petrol versions available in AUS), and the models chosen on this are the "softer" models. My Ranger is 2019 XLT Supercab with suicide doors in the rear, all the lane monitoring systems and an Aluminium tray for $52k AUD, those ones you have covered are a mixed up batch of leftover parts from Australia!
I have a GMC 2011Serria crew cab 5.3. My friend gets a new F-150 4 door every year. The 4.6 , 5.0 the 5.4 the 3.5 V6 the 2.7 V6 and the 3.7 V6. We go bass fishing in Canada every year. We have the same size bass boats mostly the same gear. So we're pulling about the same weight. We fill up before we leave and fill up before we reach the border. Every truck he gets say's the gas mileage should be better than mine. And every year he puts 3 to 5 gals more in than me. Ford has been overestimating their MPG for years!
I drove a Ranger, power but handles like a cement truck and sounds like your in a wind tunnel on the highway. I bought a Colorado and love it.
No reliability issues on the chevy?
@@cammac66 I have had extensive experience with both and the Colorado was far superior for reliability. The Rangers were constantly blowing their engines and gearboxes while the Colorados have been nothing short of reliable. I totalled the first one I had after 110k miles and now onto 150k miles in my second and haven't had an issue.
If you say Colorado is better I m getting one then . next year .
@@careywurdinger5238 you won't regret it, best mid size ute on the market IMO. The only thing holding it back is how ruthless GM can be to deal with
Well I grew up on Chevy my dad always drove a Chevy but I hear Ford pickup are not all great . I m with Chevy cause I can count on it and their better.
So cool the Colorado. Want one. ...ZR2.
John Grytbakk I have a 19. It’s a cool truck for sure
@@seadoo4life727 Lucky you. Have fun.
John Grytbakk thanks man. So far so good
My main decision point: The V6 will still be running well after 15 years. The EcoBoost... maybe not
Got the new Ranger right now it kicks ass! Wouldn’t trade it for any of these other trucks.
With regards to driver assistance tech, the Colorado has a $690.00 safety package that includes forward collision, lane departure warning and rear park assist. This is available on the 4 x 4 LT models, but not with the Z71 trim.
I have a 2019 Ford Ranger supercrew sport blue and I love it. I dont regret buying it.
I am buying one soon. Any advice or options to get?
@@tylerhenson9063 my advice buy a chevy
@@kennethsmith8968 they have way to many problems. Absolutely not
Thats IT...I am getting a Ranger. Thank you for video....👍
why would you buy a ford when the man said he preferred the chevy?
you heard what you wanted to hear
kenneth smith because it’s a preference, just because he likes the Colorado doesn’t mean your going to like it. What if you want the softer suspension because you will actually go over rough terrain? There’s a lot of other things people would consider over one of another and not only listening to some person giving his opinions.
Mistake
@@kennethsmith8968 Watch Scotty Kilmer.
I have the Colorado and I have basically the same interior as you test and I can say those are my biggest gripes about the interior. I should have really tested the wireless charger because it's absolutely to small to fit the majority of phones in and the seats aren't comfortable, even considering i have upgraded interior... All in all it's a nice looking interior with some big flaws. I should have just bought a base 4x4 model, I'd have been happier.
I own a 2005 Chevy Colorado Z71 with 190,000 miles, never seen the dealership, just bought a 2019 GMC Canyon 4x4, hopefully this truck will be just as reliable as my Chevy Colorado.
Greg Stine just bought an ‘06 Colorado with 70,000 miles in really great shape. Hopefully I get one as dependable as you had lol.
I have owned 2 Ford Rangers and currently the Chevy Colorado. The Chevy rides great and gets superb fuel mileage. However, I am one of many that have suffered the dreaded A8 Transmission Shudder problem. Have had the transmission fluid changed 3 times which is a temporary fix good for a couple of thousand miles. Chevy will not replace the Torque Converter Clutch. I am an unhappy owner and would advise others to use caution.
What year is your Colorado? And why won't Chevy replace the torque converter?
I've had my 2018 Colorado for 1.5 years and I smile every time I drive it and look at it when I get out. Drives as easy as a car, looks like a badass sporty truck, and the V6 can allow me to fly by whoever I want if I need to.
The Ranger's headlights are too small. Looks like a car someone rigged into a truck. It's still fairly attractive, but from many angles it looks funky as hell lol. I think Chevy's designs, while bizarre, have grown on my substantially. The new Silverado and HD were shocking at first, but I really like them now. The new Sierra though is my personal favorite new truck 😍.
Also, get that Colorado's air dam off lol. Chevy should be slapped for that dumb thing. And what a pain in the ass to get off...
Except the ranger will be flying by you the ranger is quite a bit quicker then the gm twins are
@@victorgirouard1543 Ranger will fly itself straight into the shop for repairs every month
I'm sure your Husband is proud of you there little lady.
This guy is a herb. He wouldn't buy these trucks, cause he's too busy putting around in his Toyota 86.
Not like these trucks are manly. They're luxury pieces of junk. Oh how the might have fallen.
Yes and I bet drive a Yugo. Review was well done. Take off the cowboy hat and just relax.
I bet people love how nice you are
Are you that low on Testosterone that you feel like you need a truck to feel “manly”?
I’m just saying, if I’m a mid-size truck buyer, this is not the guy I’m taking advice from on what truck to buy. Also, his postulation that he wouldn’t buy either is not useful for people in the market for a truck. They’re obviously machines that serve a specific purpose and if you have a need for that purpose you’ll probably buy one of them or a Tacoma. I’m guessing he doesn’t have a Tacoma either.
Had both.. My 2020 Ranger is way better and pull my boat and camper with ease. Even had a 2018 Silverado and the Ranger pulls about the same as the 5.3 did.
It’s definitely odd when the Ranger is more expensive than the F150
especially when they are not.
Milky Sponge Cake. Like when the jeep pickup is more expensive then the full size Ram.
Milky SpongeCake cause ford don’t make the ranger
@@michaelrodriguez1567 Brand new ,I paid almost 40K for my F350XLT 1 ton dually, full crew cab (4dr) 8ft bed, auto 4spd overdrive, Diesal in 2004 ! (With a bunch of power options) LOL This is what happens when we let the pickup market become marketed to women and creature comforts. Also the federal govt mandated insane emissions equipment ! :) Now you cant even buy a stripped 1/2 ton for what my 1 ton dually costs with nearly 1000ft lbs tq and seating for 6!
highly inaccurate statement there
I’m on my second Colorado, first was a 2016 Z71,4x4,V6, Ext Cab in Black. The new one is a W/T Crew Cab but as loaded as a W/T can get, with Appearance Package that gets body color door handles and Power Mirrors, dark tinted windows, Alloy Wheels and Bright Window Trim, the W/T Convenience Package that comes with Cruise Control, Locking an dampened Tailgate, 7” MyChevrolet Touch Screen with Apple CarPlay plus OnStar 4 G LTE WIFI, Towing Package with Hitch an wiring, Brake Control and Auto Locking Rear Differential, plus the three available Skid Plates made for Chevy by AEV, all for an out the door price of under 31k! The Ranger I drove did feel a little quicker off the line, but did not seem to want to rev as freely as the Chevy V6, plus the brakes felt soft, very soft and the fit an finish was disappointing.
Just wanted to point this out, I use that small cubby for a garage door opener
I use it too.
Good review except for the water test. I think you could drive down the road in the same vehicle multiple times and each time get a different result.
I have ta 2019 ZR2 and I like the Ford as well. Didn’t like the lack of non folding rear seat. Plus no Raptor model. Nice truck though.
Seadoo4life i have the LT Colorado and I love it man.Doesn’t the Eco boost have a cheaper body too? Yea in the US there’s not a Raptor option, which they need lol. But they do have them. Fords are nice trucks for sure. But at the time I got mine it wasn’t out yet.
The Colorado 2019 is the first truck I have owned, I love it, I got mine loaded with all the features I would ever need that weird compartment doesn't' have any use for me either...lol
I put my chap stick there.
I still go with the Colorado,more engine choices
You're ignorant
@@HaloDaycare why? Because he has a preference, that makes him ignorant for not agreeing with you?
I love the fucking turbo diesel in a compact truck
No, no, no. You don't go with the Colorado because of "more engine choices". You go for it because it has the best engine choice for you.
Although I do like the little cubby in the Colorado Cuz if you're going hunting it's a great place to put your bullets you can quickly grab your rifle and your ammo get out and go.
I truly enjoyed your testing and review. Thanks
I drove a Colorado about a year ago and was very impressed. I like to drive my trucks for a very long time and according to what I read, turbocharged engines tend to wear faster. So I would definitely go with a 6 cylinder naturally aspirated engine. On the flip side, the V6 Colorado is mated to the 8 speed that had issues. They say they “fixed” the problem by changing the fluid, but I need a better explanation than that. I haven’t been able to find info on 8 speed transmission issues on the 2020s so perhaps they have it under control. Perhaps the reason they haven’t announced a fix is because of the class action lawsuit. If they fixed it there must have been a problem... Wish they’d just sell it with the 6 speed. I hear the Chevys have a lot of electronics issues, but I can handle that. I just can’t purchase a vehicle if I have doubts about the transmission. Does anyone have info on the transmission issue? How about the 4 cylinder Colorado? It has the 6 speed.
Late but for anyone who sees this.
From what ive gathered online and asking a dealership, when the 8 speed was introduced for 2015, they used the wrong fluid from the factory. It absorbed moisture from the trans vent too fast and the change in viscosity caused issues. The TSB was to flush the fluid and replace it with a different one. They seem to have figured this out by 2017, as the complaints online fell off drastically, but the tsb still applies for all 2015+ years with the 8 speed. Ive read forums where people say you can walk into a gm dealer and say you have trans shudder (it has to be shudder cause thats what the tsb is for, not rough shifting) and theyll flush your trans no questions asked.
Did all this research before buying my 2019 colorado and havent had any trans issues yet at 42k miles.
The fix is confirmed in a TSB basically swaps the transmission fluid to a synthetic version. I've had it swapped no issues for the last 4 years.
Had a 2016 Camaro that had the torque converter shudder problem. They followed the TSB and triple flushed the system and installed the correct fluid and I never had any more problems. And that was with 91k miles. The only issue I had was that I had to pay 650 dollars to get it done, when it was their mistake from the factory. Why did I have to pay for their screw up?
@@danielsherrill7085 glad it worked out for you, and I hope GM is able too make it right for everyone. I went with the Tacoma. Nice truck, but pricy.
My neighbor, who is in construction, has a GMC Canyon and loves it. He only cruises in it, though, but says he loves it.
I've always driven GM vehicles, however out of these two models I have to hand it to the Ranger. I know the Ranger isn't necessarily "new", just new to North America, but it looks a lot more relevant today than the Colorado. The Colorado is in need of an update, particularly the interior.
The Ranger Lariat FX4 offers a great package at a decent price. If you compare it to a Colorado ZR2 though, I'm taking the ZR2 every time!
Thank you for being honest man. Probably not a lot of car reviewers are gonna come out and say "these trucks suck" even though you sugar coated it under "I don't love these trucks" I respect it a lot.
I wish they would have reviewed the diesel, I have a 2019 Colorado diesel and average 31 to 32 mpg highway, 26 around town, and it can tow 7700lbs, and the torque, my God! Also the suspension on the non Zr2, and midnight editions is less aggressive leading to a better overall ride. I would like a bit more room in the back seat.
I have 2.5l w/ 6spd and pulled a Tiburon
Surprise surprise turbo engine is not the most tuel efficient, ppl gettting lied to
Actually, I was quite surprised by the Ranger's mileage. I figured it would do FAR BETTER because in our last truck-comparison test (here's a link in case you haven't seen it yet: ruclips.net/video/VhALwi9mOsQ/видео.html #ShamelessPlug, LOL) where we pitted the F-150 with the 2.7-liter twin-turbo V6 against a Silverado 1500, the Ford's fuel economy was quite good and right in line with what the onboard computer said the vehicle was delivering. Of course, towing a maxed-out trailer up a mountain might have been a different story. I think something was wrong with the gas pump or filler neck on the truck, which allowed it to take an extra half gallon of fuel. Something was up because the fuel-economy readout in the Ranger was nearly 20 percent off and I can't imagine they're THAT inaccurate. Anyway, thanks for watching and commenting!
- Craig
@@AutoGuide weren't there some whistle nlowersninside Ford talking about the rangers epa testing ?
Turbo engines are fuel efficient if you use cruise everywhere.
ze3bar problem is ppl like to feel the turbo kick in so they keep pushing on it therefore there goes the mpg
@@AutoGuide : I agree Craig, I think something went very wrong there. I've pedalled lots of turbo engines and I know that they do suck fuel badly when you lean on them... but your loop numbers were unusually high. The V6 Colorado could beat the turbo 4 on fuel economy under mid or high load circumstances, but the numbers should not have been that different for your "mixed use" test. Thanks.
Loved and hated my 2016 Colorado. Programming of the drivetrain from GM was horrible. Tow/Haul mode helped a little bit. Trifecta tuning helped a little more. Transmission never could find a gear. I hear the 8 speed is better than the 6 speed I had. The little V6 is very lacking in the torque department. Good looking and capable little trucks though. In 4Lo with a set of 33” KM3 tires it wasn’t scared to go anywhere off-road. Rear springs noisy as hell though. Hopefully they fixed that too. Traded it for a full-size diesel this year. Colorado was a fun little truck but needs changed.
A four cylinder, automatic transmission equipped, pickup is garbage. What good are they besides for looks?
I'll keep my 99' reggie cab,long box 5spd manual,4x4 Ranger thank you very much.This is NOT a truck,it's a car in a trucks shell.
I agree, for me it also comes down to more options. Want more fuel economy and towing, get the 2.8L diesel, want a basic cheap get around truck, get the base 4 cylinder model. Plus the Ranger May have the Fx4 package, but the Colorado’s ZR2 (and Bison) off-road package with either the V6 or diesel makes it a blast on a trail. And still after all this, don’t forget the Toyota Tacoma is a very viable option in this segment, even preferred among most.
I agree but I just can't handle the rise position if the Toyota. Legs are level with butt
Where I live the GM is not available with the 2.8d unless you buy the top trim level. If they were smart they would make it an option across the range. I would buy a WT with the 2.8... I won't buy a mini truck denali package.
I just don’t find this commentary to be true. I own a 2019 ranger and it’s ride is firm. Also the brake pedal feels fine. Just test drive one.
Then you got the only Ranger with a firm brake pedal. On mine and on others I have seen, the brake pedal is very soft with alot of travel before it engages the brakes. Pretty bad.
@@a11062726 true
The Sysco bit at the end was hilarious. I work for Ventura foods and I know all to well how much Sysco is sold worldwide. Lmao
This truck review is better than the last truck review you did.
I am not in the market for either but this was a very thorough and enjoyable review!
What I basically got out of this is.. save more money and buy the F150
It's not quite true... if you load up either the Colorado or Ranger with options they get very pricey. I've priced the base and lower end models out where I live and you can still save thousands on buying the smaller truck. If you want a loaded Crew Cab lariat, then yes, the price difference will be small (or maybe nothing). The fuel economy difference between full sized half tons and midsized (!) trucks has never been significant. I got just as good mileage out of a 5.3 with cylinder deactivation & six speed auto on the highway as I could out of a 5cyl Canyon I borrowed years ago.
I have a 2013 ford ranger manual transmission 3.2 turbo diesel. I absolutely love it
You must be down under.
The Sysco bit was actually pretty hilarious! Hahahaha Best truck in this video... THE SYSCO TRUCK!!!!!
HIILARIOUS, the Sysco truck is best! Thanks for watching!
- Craig
Well done..better review than many So called Truck guys...keep up the good work.
Well it will be a game changer if GM equip it with the 2.7 inline 4 cylinder
Keith Collins it makes too much sense so GM decided to not do it. Instead they put the engine into CT4 sedan.
I think the Colorado more deserves the 4.3 V6.
Not if they keep that crap 8 speed transmission with an under sized torque converter. Major problem for these trucks.
So it would be a big game-changer for Ford if they put their 2.7 L V6 EcoBoost in the Ranger. Chevy Colorado would not even compete at that point.
@@erikhadinger7655 we have Rangers here in Australia with 3 engine variants,as far as im aware they were developed over here aswell,but they come with the 2.2litre turbo diesel, the 2.0litre bi-turbo diesel and a 3.2litre 5 cylinder turbo diesel...the chevy which is a rebadged holden only has the 2.8 litre turbo diesel over here and is considered to be an absolute bucket of shit...
"Now imagine this is hot mayonnaise." I had to like the video just because of that. I laughed too hard.
I want a Ranger, but I want it with a 5.0L Coyote and a longer bed
then buy F-150
@@ib8954 no, it is too big
@@dole8001 not really, that much bigger then a new ranger.
The 2.7 ecoboost would be a rocket in this truck. Chevy did build a few previous generation Colorados with the 5.3 v8. If they offered that as an option people would buy it for sure.
I rented a 2019 Colorado for a day and drove it 300 miles. My only complaint was that the screen would dim when I was backing up, rendering the backup camera useless. Otherwise I was quite impressed.
That just tells you just because it's a turbo does not mean it gets better gas mileage
It's economical when the turbo is not in use!
@@99-Zulu He did overall mileage. The turbo 4cyl is crap
@@koolkitties8552
Well I was trying to make fun of the Ecoboost.
It’s either eco or boost, not both.
Well done. Really enjoyed the down to earth details and experience!
Like only because Chevy won. Which one does a better burn out? That’s the real test!
Sonny Cole chevy😁
The Ranger is now the only pickup that doesn't have a huge grille/front end. I find that a lot more pleasing to the eyes, like older pickups used to be before F-150/Ram 1500 became huge. Even the new "small" maverick has a fat face.
6:50 "A POSSIBLE indicator of ride smoothness" *claps* OMG thats fantastically hilarious and Im honestly not sure how accurate your RSI is.
Accuracy? LOL, that's just about zero. Really, the "Ride-Smoothness Test" was more for an interesting visual than anything else. Thanks for watching!!! #WeTry
- Craig
If you are thinking about buying the Chevy, Google passlock issues first. I had that problem on 2 vehicles and its a very expensive issue and every dealer shop will act like they never heard of it so you have to spend more for the diagnostic. They know, its happens with many Chevy models and it should be a recall.
Ford ranger is too big and heavy to me. The old small ranger withthe eco boost would have been great and even a awd version would have been awesome
MrDavidelliottjr I agree they should have just looked at how to update the old generation ranger my 2003 4.0 with new technology would be a killer in this segment and it’s getting like 19 combined
It's faster than than any other small pickup though . And haul's more weight which is a good thing . Opinions are like butt holes everyone has one .
Where I worked they had Colorado's many had ignition problems, automatic shifter problems,every one the batteries lasted less than a year,all the drivers side seat started ripping on the bottom part from getting in and out,many rear led tail lights went out,many water pumps went out about 55,000 miles or less and few other bugs.
Naturally aspirated over turbo. That thing is a ticking time bomb. Less to worry about
Yep, it's about $600. But on the up side you could go bigger and turn the truck into a beast.
Ok here I am in my 20th month and 22,800 miles, in my second Colorado. The first was a 2016, Z71, Ext Cab, 4x4, V6, that I owned for just under 3 years and 59,000 trouble free miles. That I ended up trading for a Crew Cab, WT, 4x4, V6, that as stated above with trouble free service! I found the seats just the opposite between the two, plus the WT seats are even softer, but have no adjustable lumbar support or heat. But the rest is fine! I do work them fairly hard on occasion, towing the first travel trailer at 20’, 4,000 lbs max, but then the second was 26’, 4,400-6,400lbs. Both with ease, but with a weight distribution hitch for the second truck, not so much for sag, but better ride and sway control and overall comfort. On this one I’ve added some other upgrades, like Bilstien 5100 ride hight adjustable struts and shocks, that I set at 2” front, that just about leveled it, but as I stated I need to tow and still do nice an level, but now with superior dampening and added suspension travel designed into the struts! Along with 265/75-16 Cooper RTX AT tires. Now I have a nice added edge off road. Just need to see if I can remove the front air dam, to gain a little more clearance, just need to be sure more heat while towing is not generated.
someone get this guy a protein bar before a gust of wind takes him away!😑
Somebody wasn’t taught manners as a kid
Take the L
As a guy that has both, I would take brains over brawn any day of the week.
Hysterical 😂😂😂😂😂
The ranger looks like a bad version 2 of the Sport Trac. And $44k?!? You’d have to be insane to buy that “truck”. And the Tacoma still reigns supreme in this segment
I own a 2019 Base model Ford Ranger. My brakes are not spongy, my truck does not roll and it stops great. My 0-60 is 6.8 seconds. So something is wrong with your testing
The base model doesn’t have as many feature as the lariat which means the base model is lighter than the lariat
I love my 2004 Ranger 4x4! it has gone everywhere I need to, mud bogs and interstates. Older trucks rock! especially 1970s F100s, but I cant afford one, worth their weight in gold! These new trucks look all for show, does anyone actually do work with them?
I’ll stick with my ‘06 Dakota still going with 91,000 miles, simple interior, low tech, and old fashion displacement with the 4.7 V8.
Just keep up on your transmission and cooling system maintenance. As a owner of a 2005 had to rebuild the trans after 130k. The 4.7 is rock solid but slow compare to my 2018 Colorado v6. Yes love both trucks
I still can't get over the prices of these trucks. Line them up side by side and you would never think that it's a combined $85,000. I bought a Colorado a couple years ago, not as high end as the one in the test. Mostly because I simply couldn't afford a full size of any brand. It's a decent truck but definitely doesn't feel worth the money. Prices are simply outrageous on trucks anymore.
I have a Gmc Canyon love the truck. the thing made me go to the Gmc vs a ranger is for does not offer a long box on the four door model.
I come from a Ford family, but after one of their dealer owned body shops screwed me and refused to own up to it, I’m looking at the Colorado’s. GM made a nice midsize, and I like the Diesel option for sure. Glad to hear you love your Canyon
Definitely an oversight on Ford's part. They're too worried about being cheap.
Wanted the crew cab with long box myself but they are like unicorns around here.
I had an '08 4×4 Canyon, amazing!..now '19 Colorado..best off-road or much faster..Chevy is best!
They know most people that buy these trucks. Actually haul very little in the bed anyway
Bought a Wildtrak in 2017 3.2 turbo diesel 4x4 fully loaded (in Thailand) 27k usd
Tons of power, excellent economy. fantastic in monsoon season flooding and washed out roads
Ford Ranger sold in other countries is actually BETTER
zhbvenkhoReload and Colorado’s are sold in Australia?
@@blitzkrieg2251 those are holdens and typically are made in south America with the south American colorado/s10
@@Tman0517 Holden's are made in Australia.
I am a Ford person and owned a 2001 ranger but I would take the Colorado just based on looks. I hate the front end on the Ranger.
this guy sounds just like " step dad gary" from the "ew" sketches on Jimmy Fallon.
lol that's awesome, now that's all I am going to picture when I see more of these videos
Shake n bake!!!
The Sysco commercial at the end was fantastic… I subscribed
Wow, what a thorough review.
Former Ranger owner..Have a lot of respect for both of these trucks. That being said..Neither one can touch the Tacoma IMO.
care to explain?
@@bikeninja956 Best selling mid-sized truck in the universe. Proven reliability; Resale values exceed the Wrangler's; aftermarket community; and just the cult following Tacos have is immense. I sold Rangers for a few years and now sell Tacomas, it's not close.
@@Mgoblue2486 yeah, that's really good to know for first time truck buyers, I think you've convinced me,
so tacos horsepower and acceleration is pretty crappy tho right?
@@bikeninja956 marginally worse in hp than the Ranger. But it's also not turbo'd which gives it a huge advantage in reliability.
The ranger engine has a break in period, that’s probably the reason for the lower gas mileage
the review vehicles should be broken in though
The whole Ford turbo thing is a way to scam the fuel economy ratings. It’s possible to achieve it, but not when driving normally.
My 2000 Ford Ranger never got the gas mileage it said on the sticker until I found gas stations that sell gas with no ethanol.
The Colorado is the only mid sized that offers the diesel. That diesel paired with that truck brings a lot better torque and excellent MPG. Highway comes in about 30mpg
Good job mate loved your review. ...👍
Thanks for watching!
- Craig
I can relate to wireless charging pad. Most chevys are getting slight smaller pads now
I’d take the ranger any day of the week
You will be in the shop every day of the week with the ranger
Andy's Shop how so?
@@rondon9968 The 2.3 Ecoboost is a terrible engine
I have the 2.0 in my escape and it runs great
F150 are breaking down left and right. We’ve gone thru 5 work trucks that were brand new, they were in the shop all the time. Pathetic