I personally believe that it has to do with his competence and confidence in his cooking. He is really intimidating because he conveys that he knows what he's talking about and the he's good at it. You feel inferior to his force of will. He also doesn't get upset unless you've done something wrong *which you should have known* (as in Hell's Kitchen). His confidence in his abilities also prevents him from feeling threatened by the abilities of other people, so his compliments are always genuine. It's very charming to have a competent person admire or appreciate what *you* have done. His charming side is most often seen with children, because it's easier to genuinly appreciate a young chef's half-done dish than a trained professional's half-done dish.
Yeah someone above me said it. He's incredibally assertive due to his celebrity status, has a decent way of treating people on the baseline, and if you show him attitude, he'll give it back to you. 100% worse.
It's kind of hard to do that when you have a bullying jackass who is Hell bent on dominating the conversation. I watched the whole video, and that BBC reporter was trying to corner Ben the whole time. Ben was right: the interviewer did not conduct himself in good faith. Charisma on command did not portray the challenging situation that Ben was in, and frankly I think Ben held out longer than I would have. VERY disappointed in CoC.
@@darrenfleming7901 Dude no, I'm not talking about Ben Shapiro. I'm talking about the famous meme. Have you ever heard shower thoughts on Tumblr or twitter? That's what I'm referring to. Some of us actually love having a conversation with ourselves in the shower. Sometimes we think about a good comeback for past arguments that we lost. 😂 lol
Basically, if you're respectful and genuine your point is much more likely to be well-received and legitimately considered. If you're disrespectful or condescending you've all but guaranteed that the other person will respond in kind, and all of a sudden you quickly have an very unproductive discussion.
It doesn't seem like Ben Shapiro has every been interested in having a productive discussion. He's either there to be fellated by his like-minded conservative hosts, or to attempt to humiliate as much as possible, his 'liberal snowflake' opponent.
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
Just cause you are respectful doesn’t mean you are correct. Well like sure but that has nothing to do with facts or logic. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were assholes. But it doesn’t mean they weren’t the best people for the job. Being nice and polite can help, but that should never be the determining factor on who wins a debate
Mikatoon plus he was supposed to be there for an interview and said things like “why should i care” “ive never heard of you” childish things to say in any argument let alone an interview
It wasn't even an argument. It was an interview in which Shapiro, the *interviewee,* decided to turn into a debate, and which Neil clearly was not having any of.
I think Ben's error was starting the conversation with the mindset of being under attack, which is what he's mostly used to, but said mindset does not work when your interlocutor keeps his cool.
He didn’t though. He started off neutral as he didn’t know this interviewer. As the questions came in it’s very obvious where this man or more accurately his researchers slant was towards Ben. Ben gave him a few chances to redeem himself but Neil never backed down. People think he lost because he ended the interview but I think he did the right thing. At some point there’s no point arguing with someone who’s too rigid in their views to be open to a conversation.
stephen stewart But rather then properly playing devils advocate he was specifically nitpicking statements that especially come off offensive and then ignoring bens replies or waving them off as excuses and moving on to the next attack. The interviewer was extremely rude with his questions and had no drive to clarify his position instead choosing to continue essentially attacking.
I'm very surprised you didn't bring up the final words of the interview. That was the true icing on the cake. It made the viewer realize that Ben Shapiro completely went against his original stances. The sarcastic "Thank you for showing that anger isn't a part of American political discourse."
Kirsty Forshaw yes it’s sarcasm I think that bens idea is that we shouldn’t let emotions and anger get into politics Andrew was making a sarcastic remark at his expense It’s British humour sometimes it can be difficult haha
Kirsty Forshaw he normally debates people with poor or non existent debating skills unfortunately Andrew wasn’t trying to debate him but also didt fall into bens normal traps...made me lol when Ben resorted to play ground insults buy saying he had never heard of him and that he’s really famous
I think all the stupidity and unfairness that he's experienced over time while debating mainstream media had pushed him so much that he just became rude on this one.
Ben was unprepared: 1. He had no idea that British journalism has a convention of asking direct, challenging questions of interviewees, with the intention of giving them an opportunity to confront a straightforward, obvious challenge to their point-of-view. 2. He had no idea who Neil is (Conservative Party, Sunday Times editor for 11 years, 20+ years, 20+ jobs in journalism, both print and broadcast, private and public. This also made him look ridiculous when he said Neil was left-wing. 3. He was unprepared emotionally and looked thin-skinned, defensively argumentative and fidgety. He needed to take a deep breath, calm down, and answer the questions. Answering questions simply and directly, deliberately ignoring ANY negative implications or quibbles you might have with the phrasing is always a good move, positioning you as the simple truth-teller, responding to a devious questioner.
Yeah but shouldn't it sort of been his job to at least Google search the guy who was going to interview him? Is he really that full of himself that he doesn't even prepare for his interview anymore ?
He probably assumed that anyone asking a conservative tough questions had to be a liberal. Or asking a liberal had to be conservative. Thats pretty much how it is in the US.
@yellowleaf I actually think the research was irrelevant. He took every question that really caused him to examine his viewpoint and explain his reasoning as a personal attack. He claimed the interviewer hadn't read his book even after the interviewer asked him several questions around whether Shapiro's own actions contradicted the theme of his book. You also shouldn't need to research what an interview is. He kept wanting to debate the interviewer when the point was for Shapiro to promote his book and explain his philosophy. Not call the interviewer a leftist and (fail to) goad him into an argument. I think he only knows/knew how to handle softball questions and debates; no in-betweens or alternatives. And it showed.
He could have studied for a thousand years , it still would not have helped him one bit against Neil. And it was an interview not a debate , Ben turned it into a debate and he lost by his own hand.
Kenneth Novak It was a joke. Shapiro always says “facts don’t care about your feelings.” It’s basically a cliche he’s turned into a tagline. I was just making fun of that. Maybe not the best joke but I tried.
@@wyattlong8321 because the other person can't be "wrong" when they are asking questions. He wanted to promote his book which would have gone much better if he answered the questions in a convincing way.
Piers Morgan is an utterly useless political interviewer - seriously, all most Britons know him for is for co-hosting Britain's Got Talent. Andrew Neil, on the other hand, is a serious, heavyweight, Conservative journalist - pop "Andrew Neil Alex Jones" into the RUclips search bar and get ready to ROTFPYAO...
He smiles like that one kid in the class, that makes teacher lose faith in his profession a little bit - that mean little smile they have then they did or gonna do something dishonest and mean, and know that you can't do anything about it. Breaks my heart a little bit. Who hurt him and how he never grew out of it? The amount of often misplaced defensiveness in him adds to worry. Sorry for my English
As a Brit with a good understanding of American culture, watching that interview live the first time round, I found the Ben Shapiro’s main problem as that he came into the interview thinking he was there to ‘debate’. British media don’t really do ‘debates’, we simply have interviews, and our interviewers are very good and challenging someone’s beliefs - regardless of the interviewer’s personal beliefs. Ben simply didn’t know who he was talking to, or why. To say things like “People know me, they don’t know you.” to Andrew Neil on a British politics show, was quite laughable but equally sad. I’ve seen quite a few Americans have a hard time with British culture when it comes to things like interviews, they think everything is outright aggression, when in all actuality we just want to pull out the deepest part of someone’s beliefs to properly understand their point of view.
Fish Boy there are, but they’re rare. Furthermore, the host would never come down on one political side or the other. If it was a debate, there would be two guests with opposing views and the host would take more of a adjudicative role in the debate.
@@reczy no offence but I don't buy it, we live in a world that debates all the time and your telling us "us British tend to avoid debates" just shows how ignorant you really are and also a bit hypocritical. I'm not denying that there are people out there who only interview
@@reczy We do but they are typically modelled appropriately as a platform for debate. Typically you would have two or more parties with a moderator who allows for fair representation in the debate. Andrew Neil is a journalist who's job is to ask people questions they might not necessarily be comfortable answering. I don't particularly like Andrew Neil but as least he is consistent in the sense he does this to just about anyone he interviews regardless of their political standpoint.
I think a lot more people are guilty of this than actually admit it. I've been accused of being smug in arguments because I'll debunk half of the other person's logic and smirk as they raise their voice and get pissy. I'll play it off and watch the other person begin the final meltdown, then swoop in for my victory.
@@adlibconstitution1609 receipts? Of arguments I had in person? If I tried to record those arguments, the other person would have either slapped the phone out of my hand or just stormed off.
He couldn't defend his ideas on abortion, this is shown in other examples, when abortion is brought up he tends to attack the person or company conducting the interview.
@@dexterjettster8875 he slso tends to bring religion in it. But different religions have different opinions of when life officially begins in the womb. Thats the problem.
This is how most of his "interviews" go because he is right and everyone else is always wrong. Interviewer: Mr. Shapiro, what color is the sky? Ben: that's wrong and ridiculous leftist dribble.
Dexter Jettster Also it invalidates his „facts don’t care about your feelings“ point, when religion demands you put feelings and obedience over facts and science
There are several reasons he reminds a lot of people of the smug know-it-all kid who got shoved into a locker every day for correcting his classmates' grammar or bragging that his family went on holiday to the French Riviera. I've maybe only seen him give a sincere smile once, ever, very fleetingly. Otherwise, I've only noticed him smirking or scowling.
@@dinosaysrawr Hey you'd almost think political debates aren't the place for people to be light hearted and playful. You've never sen him in any real life situation so it's bold of you to assume how he acts based on his professional work.
Ben’s ‘debate’ tactic. Talk fast. Make multiple points. Interrupt your opponent when they are debating one of your several points and introduce several more points. Repeat. Claim destruction
Exactly, that drives me crazy. All he proves is that he can talk quickly, and doesn’t care what the other person has to say. When he constantly interrupts it shows a level of self-importance that is really obnoxious. When he does let the other person speak, he almost always sits there and smirks, which is pretty disrespectful and shows his disdain for the other person. He never comes to a conversation with the intent to have a discussion, his goal is only to win and feel superior. He’s an articulate guy, so I don’t know why he feels the need to speed talk like he does. Probably because he’d rather steamroll the conversation. If he slowed down a bit, and the other person was able to speak, he would have to defend his statements, many of which might be hard to defend
@@darrenfleming7901 Andrew Neil takes an opposite stance of whomever he interviews. He does this because he wants to have the person articulate their points, and show how they deal with pressure.
Personally I think Bens main mistake was going into the interview as if it were a debate, its not. It’s a very simple standard interview where one person ask questions and the other answers. Not the other way around. It’s not important for us as viewers to know what the interviewers personal believes are. It is his job to ask questions, and Shapiros job to answer or decline to answer.
I slightly disagree. The interview was supposed to be about his book, and the interviewer barely even mentioned his book. I think his mistake was the childish insults at the end.
British journalists are kind of notorious for being confrontational smartasses, whereas American journos. are more passive-aggressive and condescending. Ben is so used to being labelled as "controversial" and a "firebrand" that he goes everywhere expecting a fight, and the interviewer's style probably set off all kinds of anxieties that he's allowed to build up over the years. Touring colleges where most of the audience hates his guts has made him edgy and shellshocked, I think. He needs to stop assuming the worst about the people he's talking to until they go out of their way to prove their good intentions, or he's going to find himself with no one to talk to BUT himself, like Glenn Beck.
@@DavidGarcia-us4ov Totally agree with you. I think that there are more ways to do a promo interview (book in this case). When you have written a book about your personal believes, i think its important for us a viewers and potential buyers, to know who this person is and allow Shapiro to talk about his beliefs and former statements. Shapiro could have allowed this, but instead went for a more attack like approach, and is more of a hindrance to himself then anything.
@@CountArtha Absolutely agree, there is nothing wrong with having a belief set, and you shouldn't feel a need to defend them. In this case, Shapiro could have taken the approach of being proud of his beliefs and make that the main selling point. Instead he tries to defend them, as if there is something wrong with them, and ultimately comes of as arrogant and hostile.
David Garcia unlike in america, british interviewers like to challenge the interviewee. ben had many chances to promote his book instead of getting mad at his interviewer. he should know what he's getting into.
Actually Ben is using multiple bullying silencing techniques that usually inflame. Andrew Neil is merely reflecting the energy back, so Ben ends up ruling himself
Its true. Ben Shapiro is the greatest cheap tactic debater, and I honestly mean that, he is good because he mastered that art. It is funny to see him start a debate against someone that can not be moved by cheap tactics, he looks like the greatest fool.
@@newkboots well did you watch the interview? He tried and he got laughed at because the interviewer wont take the bait. Do you honestly need to have it spelled out for you? I honestly dont care about some random stranger online to educate them. Not worth my time to debate with Shapiro fan boys
Niel: *laughs* “Mr Shapiro, if you only knew how ridiculous that statement is, you wouldn’t have said it.” Listen, that comment punched Shapiro in the gut and ran away with his lunch money.
@@lethanielsimpson641 Neil plays the role of the opposition is his interviews. That fact is stated in this video. So yes, it's ridiculous for Shapiro to say Neil has a leftist bias
The main problem is that Ben found a disagreement where there wasn't any and so he ended up debating himself. And as always he has won the argument, against himself. The guy on BBC just had to sit and not say anything.
@Burning City You fell into the exact same trap Ben did, the reason people laugh him out of the water is because Andrew is a very farcry from a leftist. That's like Trump calling Fox leftist.
Cathy Newman had an agenda, and sequences of question used to antagonize Jordan Peterson. The same thing happened in this BBC 'interview' but the difference is, Shapiro took the bait and didn't handle it well. Regarding your comment, officially it was an interview, but read the questions man
Bruh all of his questions sounded like he just went on twitter and looked through each and every controversial Ben Shapiro tweet that looks bad out of context and in this interview he decided to use them to try and beat Ben since he couldn't win a regular debate.
@@nctsgrass I don't know about that - I mean, have you seen Jonathan Swan's utter dismantling of Das Orange Anus, Das Gropenfuhrer Donald Jackass Drumpf? Just saying!
@@jzgamer3284 Also, Piers Morgan is an utterly useless "political" interviewer - seriously, all he's known for in Great Britain is co-hosting Britains' Got Talent.
JustTheBeginning Shapiro always comes off as pissed. He is like the little yappy dog that won’t shut up because someone is walking down the sidewalk a block and a half away. He just cannot help himself.
Ben's mistake was simple. He couldn't defend what he said in the past, because he STILL believes it. He's never apologized for what he's said. He's apologized because he didn't get the response he thought he would.
Not on the BBC, no. The interviewer in this case Andrew Neil isn't allowed by law to give his personal opinion, it's a state run corporation and has to stay impartial. When interviewing someone giving one view, in this case pro life, he has to counter argue, whether that's actually his personal belief or not.
@@bubbybumble616 You're absolutely correct about Andrew Neil - he IS extremely right-wing for a British journalist, but he treats everybody in exactly the same way...
@@christopherjobin-official7440 He wasn't even destroyed here. The problem is that Neil started taking the "interview" out of context. He started using tweets from the past, which is what the left does. Oddly enough, ret**ds think that the Neil is from the right, he is actually a democrat by US terms, but considered right leaning in Britain.
He called Andrew Neil a liberal. Ben came in unprepared and was very defensive. This wasn't a college student he could talk circles around, this was a life-long conservative.
Well the interviewer didn't know him either and he's the one who onvited him. So he should have at least watched a few videos of Ben. And also Ben can not know the interviewer because those informations are not given when your interviewed. Plus the person is only famous in UK soooooooooooooooooo
@@hjl4204 Producers for these shows have to brief presenters and guests, so they likely did know a bit about each other beforehand, although you should do your own research as well. It's possible they either didn't listen to producers or ignored briefs they gave them beforehand
@Burning City He was playing Devil's Advocate the whole time. He's a pro-lifer. His goal was to get Ben Shapiro to show his European audience what American conservatism was and how it differed from conservatism in Europe. Ben was letting his emotions get the best of him. That's all there is to it.
Ben Shapiro came up against a grown-up, professional interviewer and couldn't deal with it. He even resorted to "I'm more popular than you" as an avenue to try and "win". Sad.
Ben Shapiro did lose this debate... he went from being an adult to a man-child lol "I'm more popular than you!" what are you, Ben? An insecure teenager?
I watched this when it was originally on, another major mistake Shapiro made was to forget it was a UK audience & compared Neil he was the lesser known and so his comment was doubly embarrassing.
He relies on his fast, aggressive speech to appear to be in a superior position. When challenged by someone prepared, not even in an arranged debate, he loses his apparent cool.
@@jamescunningham1844 That's why he tried to make an interview into a debate, right? That's why he went on this show without knowing anything about the interviewer or their political leanings, right? That's why he humiliated himself and anyone who thinks of him as an intellectual in such a stunning, damning manner, right? He is just that smart. LOL.
I think it's because they did an analysis a few weeks back on how to be charming using her as an example, so they would already have a lot of footage of her saved ... But I agree, without that context it makes it look like Charlie has a massive crush (who could blame him?)
it was not an interview, the interviewer was quoting 5year old tweets of ben shapiro and acting like those were his views, the funny thing is that ben tells him and the audience that he had realised that these were wrong and even made a whole website in wich he lists them as wrong but ofc everybody ignores that
When Ben made the claims over him being left winged and Andrew Neil laughed that is because he actually supports the Conservative party and was Chairman of the Federation of Conservative Students which are centre right, not left winged 🤣 Facts may not care about your feelings but clearly little Benjamin over here doesn't know the facts.🤣
Topspur76 Well that’s a given but they do have a lot of similarities. They may differ on gun laws and such, but when it comes to foreign policy and immigration they are very much alike
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
@@wadeobryan4175 Yeah. 'cause it's not like Andrew Neil once posited that, as HIV isn't really a problem for heterosexuals, it isn't really a problem at all, is it?
@@octopuss1918 Yeah, definitely the ones who are on the news etc., but I'd hope there were some members of the public who aren't for their country's sake
@@TheIfifi He's right about 7% of the time and that's when he's making obviously true statements (most often to try and defend an unreasonable position).
Back to basic good human values. 1) Joke it off, take things easy. 2) Don't judge others. 3) Don't keep grudges. 4) Speak for others to understand, not dominate others.
Nah I speak to dominate ... Only the weak speak to understand Speaking with jokes weaken your point and makes you like you're covering something you don't know or that you get straight to jokes to cover the fact that you're starting to not making sense But I agree with the other once except that when sometimes you have the right evidence to show that the person who's arguing with you is in fact not what he described him self and that he trying to investigate and take information from you , you need to expose this person and confront him like Ben did with that interviewer from the UK because in America people like that person is probably in the left and the way he investigate Ben's tweets and RUclips videos when the interview is infact on the new book of Shapiro "The right side of history" showed that he wanted to show that Ben was wrong and that he's a reactionary conservative
Except for bill maher, cenk uygur, Joe Rogan, Sam Harris, piers morgan, don lemon. He does mostly college campus because his target audience is millennials
That's why he doesn't want debate with actual intellectuals who have better experience than him. If he does an actual debate with a famous intellectual, he'll get destroyed with facts and logic.
New Ant I wouldn’t say so. The Inbetweeners is quite popular outside of the UK and British music has always been popular although not everyone likes it e.g. The Beatles, One Direction.
I'm British and I find British interviewers very irritating and dishonest. Their sole goal seems to be to constantly attack and belittle the interviewee rather than actually give them a platform to discuss their views in an honest way.
@@Anon-nv7bp the point of journalism isn't to give someone a platform. If someone wants a platform, they can make RUclips videos or go one someone's podcast. Journalism's purpose is to hold people accountable.
He's debated numerous people who have been trained to debate. Issue is, he couldnt win this because there was nothing to win, it was an interview, not a debate. Hence, because he came in looking for a progressive debate, nothing moved forward, annoying him.
@@joeydoherty368 Um, no, Andrew never said "barbaric" - wittle Benjamina Aaron Shitpiro used the word "barbaric" . Seriously, watch the video again if you don't believe me...
@Cheap Skate Also, I live in Edinburgh, Scotland and I'm MORE THAN HAPPY TO PAY MY TV LICENCE (WHICH COSTS £154.50 PER YEAR IF YOU HAVE A COLOUR TELEVISION, OR £52 A YEAR, IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE LIVING IN THE 1970'S AND HAVE A BLACK-AND-WHITE SET.) I'm particularly happy to pay FORTY-TWO PENCE A DAY for it when the BBC produce brilliant content like this. Also, if you can't receive BBC programmes, you don't have to pay anything.
Ben smirks in a lot of his debates because he’s trying to get the other person to get emotional he only does it when he starts to lose and the other person will get emotional
btm56841 nope try again. It is cherry picking I wonder if you actually check the source he uses when he debates. Talking fast with Cherry picked facts does not equate to being right he just wants to win the argument not be right in most cases he’s not right.
I dont trust people who’s confirmation bias controls their mind. Shipiro doesn’t consult any sources of info other than his own and fails to listen to other points of view and take them into perspective. He thinks hes always right and immediately rejects points of view that are contrary to his. Listen more than you talk and you just might learn something.
It's hard to argue against another point if you don't even understand it. Ben likes to think he understands literally everything and doesn't want to admit he might not know what he doesn't know. He HAS to feel like hes the smartest person in the room, treats every conversation like an argument lol.
Ben Shapiro cites sources more than any other speaker I've ever seen. Have you watched his videos? He cites scientific studies, laws, court rulings, historical political occurrences, and just about every relevant thing you can think of. Not sure why you say he doesn't consult any sources. He believes very strongly in what he believes in and is very confident in it, but considering his extreme success in debates and the points that he makes during said debates, it is easy to see why. This is the closest thing to "losing" a debate Ben Shapiro has, and he didn't even lose a debate. None of his arguments or points were countered, the other guy wasn't even debating him in the first place, he just got really pissed off for some reason and left the debate. But given how calm and collected he is during his other debates, I think he probably had something else going on outside of the debate. The guy has done and won hundreds of debates at this point all of which he has remained cool for. It isn't surprising that he had a bad day for one of them.
@@zachary7897 I like Ben Shapiro. I like his demeanor in some of his debates, and I agree with him on some of his stances. What OP is talking about is confirmation bias, and I can definitely see that in a lot of what he says. If you don't know, confirmation bias is have a preconceived idea, and then gathering evidence (actual facts, like what Shapiro uses in most of his arguments) to support this idea. It's completely in contrast to the objective approach, where you get the evidence, you weigh in other factors that work against or hand in hand with the evidence, and then come to a conclusion.
I'm sorry but despite you agreeing with him or not he does say A LOT of uncomfortable truths some people would rather ignore or act as if things weren't there, which is inherent to being smart regardless of your ideology, you know, you can't ignore what you see or feel, and it's more difficult to deceive oneself. But then there's the other side of that, in which your bias modifies your 'factual' statements, your wishes in certain fuzzy or arguable matters getting in the way of your interpretation, which happens to the best of us, hence why even the most renowed intellectuals ever have rejected the term 'objectivity'. Plus there's also a huge part of things that is merely an opinion he strongly defends, and you can defend, but saying 'that never goes well' is ridiculous because he's more right than he's wrong.
I'm talking about the people in the room. They don't have the chance to slow him down. He'll say three vaguely intelligent sounding things one after another to rush what may be inaccuracies past a trusting audience., often stringing unconnected facts together with faulty logic.
People loved this so much because Ben has made a living based on "owing" people. He likes "debating" against under prepared and emotional college students and making them look like fools. While the video was fun to watch, because Ben is just unbearably smug sometimes. I still think is shows that Ben is apart of the problem with the new media.
Davida quite a bit of what Ben says when debating college kids are wrong or misrepresented, but the kids don’t know that so they go along with it and Ben’s fans are like”facts don’t care about your feelings”
@Davida It's pretty obvious the people you're replying to are satisfied with their image of Ben and don't care for a much more honest one. No point here
Ben absolutely loves to use the emotional part. Everytime he is speaking to some young students or sjws he tries to offend them until they get emotional and he can show them off as crazy
@@BerrysTC Nah, by invalidating their personal experiences (which would normally matter to determine the matter he’s “debating”), brush important points aside, grasp at strawmans, and twist the meanings of their words.
YES. Thank you. I'm so glad this video was made. I'm tired of people trying to say he's a great debater. He isn't. He uses dirty tricks that are blatantly obvious to anyone who is being even slightly intellectually honest. His "charisma" is just smarmy, overbearing bullying.
What is your idea being charismatic? Those who are charismatic often those are the one who gets the most attention, and having different ideologies and proposing a different one, unlike the most of the people do, and i know he good at that, and yes he is not a full-charismatic one, he's not persuasive,manipulative, and exerting situations, speech,listening,making your big points, holding the emotion and control every aspect of other people these are the abilities of charismatic people and much more
@@xasparovj0222 A fair question. Charisma is the quality of winning people over with charm and grace. It literally comes from the Greek _kharisma_ , meaning "favor" or "grace". There is no grace in what Shapiro does. He doesn't win people over, he steamrolls over them. He is good at making a lot of noise and being controversial, and those can be great qualities for a showman whose only aim is getting attention (which I believe is exactly what he is trying to do). But it doesn't make him charismatic, and it doesn't make him a skilled debater.
You can break it down any way you like, the simple fact is that Shapiro went into an interview thinking he was the superior intellect. He didn't do his homework, he had absolutely no idea who was interviewing him, he basically went in with the American attitude and got schooled. Andrew has been a conservative since before Ben was born, and Andrew has been a quality journalist since before Ben was a glint in the milkmans eye.
The thing is, that's Ben's gimmick. He gives no f*cks about truth or conversation; it's all just pageantry to him. To be fair this channel is about analyzing that pageantry, and it's a helpful augmentation for when you have valid points to make, but when you don't care about truth like Shapiro it also fuels sophistry.
seriously, thank you. all ben had to do was answer the questions, ben was so uninformed on who the host was he didnt even know that andrew neil was conservative, so he assumed it was some opponent hurling gotcha questions at him, obviously he is giving ben a chance to defend and justify his positions and ben is taking it as an attack.. so he got overly defensive and missed the entire purpose of the exchange. neil is not unaware of how the internet works, the titles he was talking about are coming from daily wire that he runs, not just people creating sjw cringe compilations. the daily wire channel titles those debates n discussions the same way, and essentially started it. strangers with no connection to shapiro title their videos of people losing debates this way because of that. idk this interview was a mess, and i think ben needs to have more exchanges with figures that actually have poise, as opposed to the whiny college kids that get easily flustered with no media training he's too accustomed to.
BigA2K hahaha never heard this joke or any type of joke like this before 😂😂😂👌🏻👌🏻🔥🔥💪🏻😆😂🔥🔥😂👌🏻💪🏻👌🏻💪🏻😂💪🏻😆🔥😆😆😆😆👌🏻💪🏻😆😬🔥😆😆💪🏻🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥😂💪🏻👌🏻😆😂😆👌🏻💪🏻😆😂💪🏻👌🏻😆😂💪🏻🔥🔥🔥🔥😂😂😂😂😂😆😆👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
This channel has changed my life so quickly. I've worked so hard to mold myself into a respectable person and I never really knew what I was doing, and now hearing these things put into words just really helped me shape how I view the world and how I view myself. Anyway, I really appreciate all the work and teaching your channel does 🖤🖤
Literally! Lets not forget that Shapiro has said that he is fully okay with civilian deaths in war as long it progresses his respective parties' agenda
Love how you keep saying people "felt" like he lost... it wasn't even a debate it was an interview, he lost because he threw a tantrum and left. There's no "feeling" about it.
Yeah that really throw me off on this video. He lost, simply because he took offense from non argumentative questions just like a snowflake he often likes to talk about.
"what went wrong for ben?" Instead of answering a question made by the interviewer he started to rumbling about why Andrew Neil is a leftist and therefore he doesn't deserve an answer.
Why did you ever admire daft wee Benny? Seriously, it manages, somehow, to combine being Jewish with being a Nazi, and that is NEVER going to be a good look, is it?
Yeah maybe he finally got angry for once, he isn’t perfect alright. Just because he messed up during this interview doesn’t mean he is a terrible person. Also notice he never showed more then five seconds of the video at a time. We never saw what led up to the heated debate
Richard Smart so now someone is a nazi if they are mean for 1 interview. I think you might need to look at a history book or just a definition of what a nazi is.
Jack R the full interview is on RUclips, it’s only 16 minutes long. As someone who watched it Ben definitely came across as an emotion snobby child. He was being interviewed not debated and tried to constantly attack Andrew for asking a question, just overall came across as an emotional being. You are welcome to watch the original video though.
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
Wrong! Robots have something called a logic board that helps them calculate their next action, be is just a 4 year old who always got what he wanted and now someone is telling him no and he cannot accept it.
Agreed 100%. It's hard to agree with what he says even when it's true because how his tone comes off. It's one of the reasons I can't watch any of his interviews or even his show.
@@David93434 If you want to be agreed with, there are certain ways to convey your thought. You can have the universal truth in your hands, but if you're incapable of debating, your truth isn't worth shit.
@@tatpik2 Ben IS smug and pompous. He is also right most of the times. If people can't handle it and need to be offended that's their problem. If you think it takes a psychologist to get this or have an opinion then that says a bit about you too
I have watched some of Ben Shapiro's debates to see how he DESTROYS the other person, but he talks so fast and others try to talk over him and vice versa I end up not understanding anything.
Duh Im a dope, therefore Ben must be wrong because i dont understand and he talks to fast for my pea brain. Slow down playback if your struggling with limited intelligence.
@@velucadhirim6725 well it's a good question, and I guess it depends on the circumstance. I am really surprised CoC was critical of Ben Shapiro, but they were celebrating Robert Downey Jr's exit from an interview under very similar circumstances. CoC should make up their minds. 😬 But back to your question, I think if there is no exit option, then there must be some commensurate "rules of engagement" that would have helped him to keep the conversation on track. The Kavanaugh hearings provide an example of this. The main point is to prevent people from talking over one another.
oks Iva But did he DeStRoY them? No, why would someone so weak go on the offense. I hate Bill Maher, but he really made a fool out of some of Ben’s childish statements.
Ben Shapiro is a skilled debater. It's the kind of person you don't necessarily agree with, but you really can't find a way to disprove what they say. (Without resorting to childish tantrums...)
@@jokestar2577 Well, you can disprove what he says, especially when the debate veers towards something that is more subjected by personal opinion than pure data. Like abortion for example. But his problems is that he really is a bully that doesn't leave space for debate, just rushes the conversation.
@@DerpEye what do you mean his abortion argument is "subjective"? abortion is 100% objective. it's killing an innocent life and no excuse can be made for it
Absolutely. That being said, he really did have a bad day or something, regardless of the questions themselves. He could have definitely done better even if he had been out of his territory.
Sam Harris is an uninformed college student? Cenk Uyger is an uninformed college student? Joe Rogan is uninformed college student? Andrew Yang is an uninformed college student? Bill Maher is an uninformed college student?
kungfoochicken08 only uninformed students would put that much weight on where someone graduated from. What Ben is good at is making himself sound intelligent to naive and uninformed people.
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
He did not prepare himself of the interviewer of his cultural background. In the US being right wing means you support banning abortion. He assumed same applies to other countries.
Yeah, but the classic Jewish view on pregnancy is that a foetus ISN'T A PERSON UNTIL IT'S BORN, which kinda begs the question: where does it get its' views from?
This is how smart Shapiro is, he didn't know the difference between a debate or an interview, he should go back to debating college kids. As they say if you can't run with the hounds go off and piss like a puppy.
That, "nobody's ever heard of you," bit changed me from somebody who was impartial to Ben Shapiro to one who dislikes him. There is zero value in the court of public opinion and that statement alone undermines the entire idea of Shapiro being, "intellectual." It's interesting to see him get so triggered, but that's the inevitable result of this vitriol-based social discourse we have of this day and age. Shapiro says he's above it, but clearly we don't have as much respect for each-other as we all like to think.
So I guess you have the moral superiority and have never lost your cool before and said things you regret. It is laughable for you to think he is not intelligent because he lost his cool. All the points he made were still solid if you take them by face.
While I understand what you mean I think it is more of a psychological thing. Ben walked in to the interview like it was a debate, which it clearly wasn’t so he was unconsciously looking for points that could have been made against him or points “arguing” with him, so it made him look like a really insecure person. While he started to get frustrated because there wasn’t any points to find so he started grasping at whatever sounded like an attack. This made him “lose” the “argument”.
rsbmg Call it what you will (or won’t), it was an exchange Ben clearly was uncomfortable with, and unprepared for. He got his cage rattled real good. Fun to watch
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
Can you analyse Gordon Ramsay? He has a really intimidating character but charming at the same time. Could you please explain how he does that?
Syndrox yessss i love Gordon Ramsay!
I'd also love this
I personally believe that it has to do with his competence and confidence in his cooking. He is really intimidating because he conveys that he knows what he's talking about and the he's good at it. You feel inferior to his force of will. He also doesn't get upset unless you've done something wrong *which you should have known* (as in Hell's Kitchen). His confidence in his abilities also prevents him from feeling threatened by the abilities of other people, so his compliments are always genuine. It's very charming to have a competent person admire or appreciate what *you* have done.
His charming side is most often seen with children, because it's easier to genuinly appreciate a young chef's half-done dish than a trained professional's half-done dish.
Honest but has good manners
Yeah someone above me said it. He's incredibally assertive due to his celebrity status, has a decent way of treating people on the baseline, and if you show him attitude, he'll give it back to you. 100% worse.
"Speak only when you fully intend on finishing your sentence." I love this. Mindset shift activated!
Yeah, these videos always have real nuggets of knowledge and wisdom in them. Will have to remember that advice and test it out.
It's kind of hard to do that when you have a bullying jackass who is Hell bent on dominating the conversation. I watched the whole video, and that BBC reporter was trying to corner Ben the whole time. Ben was right: the interviewer did not conduct himself in good faith. Charisma on command did not portray the challenging situation that Ben was in, and frankly I think Ben held out longer than I would have. VERY disappointed in CoC.
@@enshala6401 The problem with Ben Shapiro is that he's a grifter, not an intellectual.
@@enshala6401 So basically, he was winning the argument and that makes him a jackass?
@@megashark1013 no, he was acting like a troll, which makes him a jackass. Did you watch the interview?
It's okay to lose an argument. You can always win the same argument five years later in the shower
I felt this in my soul
i'd love for you to explain to me what the argument was about, if you're so sure that he lost it.
Darren Fleming lmao his puny followers are so ready to to attack when everyone is so laid back, it’s actually quite sad 😂
@@user-lu4xp7iv8c how would you know i'm a ben shapiro follower, do you have magical psychic powers to read into my mind?
@@darrenfleming7901 Dude no, I'm not talking about Ben Shapiro. I'm talking about the famous meme. Have you ever heard shower thoughts on Tumblr or twitter? That's what I'm referring to. Some of us actually love having a conversation with ourselves in the shower. Sometimes we think about a good comeback for past arguments that we lost. 😂 lol
Basically, if you're respectful and genuine your point is much more likely to be well-received and legitimately considered. If you're disrespectful or condescending you've all but guaranteed that the other person will respond in kind, and all of a sudden you quickly have an very unproductive discussion.
Hulk Butter 👏🏻👏🏻
Very well said.
It doesn't seem like Ben Shapiro has every been interested in having a productive discussion. He's either there to be fellated by his like-minded conservative hosts, or to attempt to humiliate as much as possible, his 'liberal snowflake' opponent.
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
Just cause you are respectful doesn’t mean you are correct. Well like sure but that has nothing to do with facts or logic. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were assholes. But it doesn’t mean they weren’t the best people for the job. Being nice and polite can help, but that should never be the determining factor on who wins a debate
He lost as soon as he started insulting him, when you resort to insults in an argument it makes you look ignorant and flawed
Mikatoon plus he was supposed to be there for an interview and said things like “why should i care” “ive never heard of you” childish things to say in any argument let alone an interview
Well said.
It wasn't even an argument. It was an interview in which Shapiro, the *interviewee,* decided to turn into a debate, and which Neil clearly was not having any of.
And that's what Shapiro is usually debating to, sad to see he couldn't keep his cool when he met someone on the same (or higher) level
Then I guess the Left loses every debate they ever go into. They start throwing insults right from the start.
I think Ben's error was starting the conversation with the mindset of being under attack, which is what he's mostly used to, but said mindset does not work when your interlocutor keeps his cool.
He didn’t though. He started off neutral as he didn’t know this interviewer. As the questions came in it’s very obvious where this man or more accurately his researchers slant was towards Ben. Ben gave him a few chances to redeem himself but Neil never backed down. People think he lost because he ended the interview but I think he did the right thing. At some point there’s no point arguing with someone who’s too rigid in their views to be open to a conversation.
Which is what happened. This is the bbc after all.
@stephen stewart Andrew Neil is british right wing, otherwise known as American left wing.
@@sharinglungs3226 Spot on
stephen stewart But rather then properly playing devils advocate he was specifically nitpicking statements that especially come off offensive and then ignoring bens replies or waving them off as excuses and moving on to the next attack. The interviewer was extremely rude with his questions and had no drive to clarify his position instead choosing to continue essentially attacking.
I'm very surprised you didn't bring up the final words of the interview. That was the true icing on the cake. It made the viewer realize that Ben Shapiro completely went against his original stances.
The sarcastic "Thank you for showing that anger isn't a part of American political discourse."
Kirsty Forshaw not op but it’s a jibe at the fact Ben was getting angry and was a joke at expense
Kirsty Forshaw yes it’s sarcasm I think that bens idea is that we shouldn’t let emotions and anger get into politics Andrew was making a sarcastic remark at his expense
It’s British humour sometimes it can be difficult haha
Kirsty Forshaw he was probably too pissed to care haha
Kirsty Forshaw he normally debates people with poor or non existent debating skills unfortunately Andrew wasn’t trying to debate him but also didt fall into bens normal traps...made me lol when Ben resorted to play ground insults buy saying he had never heard of him and that he’s really famous
I think all the stupidity and unfairness that he's experienced over time while debating mainstream media had pushed him so much that he just became rude on this one.
Ben was unprepared:
1. He had no idea that British journalism has a convention of asking direct, challenging questions of interviewees, with the intention of giving them an opportunity to confront a straightforward, obvious challenge to their point-of-view.
2. He had no idea who Neil is (Conservative Party, Sunday Times editor for 11 years, 20+ years, 20+ jobs in journalism, both print and broadcast, private and public. This also made him look ridiculous when he said Neil was left-wing.
3. He was unprepared emotionally and looked thin-skinned, defensively argumentative and fidgety. He needed to take a deep breath, calm down, and answer the questions. Answering questions simply and directly, deliberately ignoring ANY negative implications or quibbles you might have with the phrasing is always a good move, positioning you as the simple truth-teller, responding to a devious questioner.
Yeah but shouldn't it sort of been his job to at least Google search the guy who was going to interview him? Is he really that full of himself that he doesn't even prepare for his interview anymore ?
@@norika.pallaska5709 Exactly
He probably assumed that anyone asking a conservative tough questions had to be a liberal. Or asking a liberal had to be conservative.
Thats pretty much how it is in the US.
@yellowleaf I actually think the research was irrelevant. He took every question that really caused him to examine his viewpoint and explain his reasoning as a personal attack. He claimed the interviewer hadn't read his book even after the interviewer asked him several questions around whether Shapiro's own actions contradicted the theme of his book.
You also shouldn't need to research what an interview is. He kept wanting to debate the interviewer when the point was for Shapiro to promote his book and explain his philosophy. Not call the interviewer a leftist and (fail to) goad him into an argument.
I think he only knows/knew how to handle softball questions and debates; no in-betweens or alternatives. And it showed.
He could have studied for a thousand years , it still would not have helped him one bit against Neil.
And it was an interview not a debate , Ben turned it into a debate and he lost by his own hand.
This interviewer didn’t care about Ben’s feelings.
LOL
Not his job to care, if Ben can't handle questions which was the purpose of the interview then it is on him
Kenneth Novak It was a joke. Shapiro always says “facts don’t care about your feelings.” It’s basically a cliche he’s turned into a tagline. I was just making fun of that. Maybe not the best joke but I tried.
"Facts don't care about your feelings"
"Unless they're my feelings" -Ben Shapiro
the irony
I think some of Ben's problems stem from the fact that he's a lawyer. His goal generally isn't to reach common ground, it's to win.
Also from the fact that he's so used to debating people that it's his go-to mode of conversation when on camera.
What's the point of common ground when the other person is wrong?
@@bitticlan I think that better explains it
@@wyattlong8321 because the other person can't be "wrong" when they are asking questions. He wanted to promote his book which would have gone much better if he answered the questions in a convincing way.
Wyatt Long we often think of things as right & wrong, black & white, but there are looooots of everyday situations where there’s plenty of gray area
Ben Shapiro: “Smirks”
Piers Morgan: You can smirk at me and laugh at me.
Ben Shapiro: I’m not smirking
Also Ben Shapiro: continues to smirk.
Piers Morgan is an utterly useless political interviewer - seriously, all most Britons know him for is for co-hosting Britain's Got Talent.
Andrew Neil, on the other hand, is a serious, heavyweight, Conservative journalist - pop "Andrew Neil Alex Jones" into the RUclips search bar and get ready to ROTFPYAO...
@@richardsmart5532 Actually while he acts like a prick, Morgan is a very, very good interviewer.
He smiles like that one kid in the class, that makes teacher lose faith in his profession a little bit - that mean little smile they have then they did or gonna do something dishonest and mean, and know that you can't do anything about it. Breaks my heart a little bit. Who hurt him and how he never grew out of it? The amount of often misplaced defensiveness in him adds to worry. Sorry for my English
Then he says he's not smirking he seems even more like a child. Ugh that's sad (and kinda strange)
@@potmki6601 Your English is very good - from an Englishman!
As a Brit with a good understanding of American culture, watching that interview live the first time round, I found the Ben Shapiro’s main problem as that he came into the interview thinking he was there to ‘debate’. British media don’t really do ‘debates’, we simply have interviews, and our interviewers are very good and challenging someone’s beliefs - regardless of the interviewer’s personal beliefs.
Ben simply didn’t know who he was talking to, or why. To say things like “People know me, they don’t know you.” to Andrew Neil on a British politics show, was quite laughable but equally sad.
I’ve seen quite a few Americans have a hard time with British culture when it comes to things like interviews, they think everything is outright aggression, when in all actuality we just want to pull out the deepest part of someone’s beliefs to properly understand their point of view.
Fish Boy there are, but they’re rare. Furthermore, the host would never come down on one political side or the other. If it was a debate, there would be two guests with opposing views and the host would take more of a adjudicative role in the debate.
I agree, it seemed clear to me that he was trying to understand who he was dealing with, and was a bit lost and on the defensive
@@reczy no offence but I don't buy it, we live in a world that debates all the time and your telling us "us British tend to avoid debates" just shows how ignorant you really are and also a bit hypocritical. I'm not denying that there are people out there who only interview
You just defined a *devil's advocate*
@@reczy We do but they are typically modelled appropriately as a platform for debate. Typically you would have two or more parties with a moderator who allows for fair representation in the debate. Andrew Neil is a journalist who's job is to ask people questions they might not necessarily be comfortable answering. I don't particularly like Andrew Neil but as least he is consistent in the sense he does this to just about anyone he interviews regardless of their political standpoint.
"I'm not smirking" he smirked.
I laughed to hard at this
I think a lot more people are guilty of this than actually admit it. I've been accused of being smug in arguments because I'll debunk half of the other person's logic and smirk as they raise their voice and get pissy. I'll play it off and watch the other person begin the final meltdown, then swoop in for my victory.
@@richarddavie6396 receipts please or a load of bs
@@adlibconstitution1609 receipts? Of arguments I had in person? If I tried to record those arguments, the other person would have either slapped the phone out of my hand or just stormed off.
@@richarddavie6396 he's saying you sound like a smug boastful bastard right now.
The problem with this was.....
BBC was doing an INTERVIEW.
Ben was doing a DEBATE.
He couldn't defend his ideas on abortion, this is shown in other examples, when abortion is brought up he tends to attack the person or company conducting the interview.
@@dexterjettster8875 he slso tends to bring religion in it. But different religions have different opinions of when life officially begins in the womb. Thats the problem.
@@GabrielUngacta yes, he follows his religion strictly, and I don't think that's good for people, I don't think its good for humanity.
This is how most of his "interviews" go because he is right and everyone else is always wrong.
Interviewer: Mr. Shapiro, what color is the sky?
Ben: that's wrong and ridiculous leftist dribble.
Dexter Jettster Also it invalidates his „facts don’t care about your feelings“ point, when religion demands you put feelings and obedience over facts and science
Good observation about the Ben Shapiro smirk. It’s very off-putting.
Andrew Miller That was when I started to dislike Ben and haven’t been listening as much to him anymore as I did.
There are several reasons he reminds a lot of people of the smug know-it-all kid who got shoved into a locker every day for correcting his classmates' grammar or bragging that his family went on holiday to the French Riviera. I've maybe only seen him give a sincere smile once, ever, very fleetingly. Otherwise, I've only noticed him smirking or scowling.
he does it to be extremely provocative, that's his whole thing. He even says in his interview he encourages harsh and dry speech in political debates
@@dinosaysrawr Hey you'd almost think political debates aren't the place for people to be light hearted and playful. You've never sen him in any real life situation so it's bold of you to assume how he acts based on his professional work.
I'm the 666th like 😱😂
Ben’s ‘debate’ tactic. Talk fast. Make multiple points. Interrupt your opponent when they are debating one of your several points and introduce several more points. Repeat. Claim destruction
Classic Gish Gallop
that and only debating with college students.
Exactly, that drives me crazy. All he proves is that he can talk quickly, and doesn’t care what the other person has to say. When he constantly interrupts it shows a level of self-importance that is really obnoxious. When he does let the other person speak, he almost always sits there and smirks, which is pretty disrespectful and shows his disdain for the other person.
He never comes to a conversation with the intent to have a discussion, his goal is only to win and feel superior.
He’s an articulate guy, so I don’t know why he feels the need to speed talk like he does. Probably because he’d rather steamroll the conversation. If he slowed down a bit, and the other person was able to speak, he would have to defend his statements, many of which might be hard to defend
Very Trumpy.
True!
You missed the most important part: Don't pretent the interview is a debate
Thaaaaank you. That was not just a interview and compere it is definitely not fair
even when it clearly is a debate?
@@darrenfleming7901 it clearly wasn't. Andrew Neil never took the silly bait of turning the interview into one.
@@darrenfleming7901 Andrew Neil takes an opposite stance of whomever he interviews. He does this because he wants to have the person articulate their points, and show how they deal with pressure.
@@napalmblaziken And how did wittle Shitpiro "deal with pressure"? He BRAVELY TURNED HIS TAIL AND FLED, to quote Monty Python...
Personally I think Bens main mistake was going into the interview as if it were a debate, its not. It’s a very simple standard interview where one person ask questions and the other answers. Not the other way around. It’s not important for us as viewers to know what the interviewers personal believes are. It is his job to ask questions, and Shapiros job to answer or decline to answer.
I slightly disagree. The interview was supposed to be about his book, and the interviewer barely even mentioned his book. I think his mistake was the childish insults at the end.
British journalists are kind of notorious for being confrontational smartasses, whereas American journos. are more passive-aggressive and condescending. Ben is so used to being labelled as "controversial" and a "firebrand" that he goes everywhere expecting a fight, and the interviewer's style probably set off all kinds of anxieties that he's allowed to build up over the years. Touring colleges where most of the audience hates his guts has made him edgy and shellshocked, I think. He needs to stop assuming the worst about the people he's talking to until they go out of their way to prove their good intentions, or he's going to find himself with no one to talk to BUT himself, like Glenn Beck.
@@DavidGarcia-us4ov Totally agree with you. I think that there are more ways to do a promo interview (book in this case). When you have written a book about your personal believes, i think its important for us a viewers and potential buyers, to know who this person is and allow Shapiro to talk about his beliefs and former statements. Shapiro could have allowed this, but instead went for a more attack like approach, and is more of a hindrance to himself then anything.
@@CountArtha Absolutely agree, there is nothing wrong with having a belief set, and you shouldn't feel a need to defend them. In this case, Shapiro could have taken the approach of being proud of his beliefs and make that the main selling point. Instead he tries to defend them, as if there is something wrong with them, and ultimately comes of as arrogant and hostile.
David Garcia unlike in america, british interviewers like to challenge the interviewee. ben had many chances to promote his book instead of getting mad at his interviewer. he should know what he's getting into.
Actually Ben is using multiple bullying silencing techniques that usually inflame.
Andrew Neil is merely reflecting the energy back, so Ben ends up ruling himself
Its true. Ben Shapiro is the greatest cheap tactic debater, and I honestly mean that, he is good because he mastered that art. It is funny to see him start a debate against someone that can not be moved by cheap tactics, he looks like the greatest fool.
@@jud6ment "Cheap tricks" yeah he's using some real cheap tricks, going to Harvard Law school and using those pesky cheap tricks.
@@newkboots yup, he does them very well.
@@jud6ment Please tell me some of these "cheap tricks"
@@newkboots well did you watch the interview? He tried and he got laughed at because the interviewer wont take the bait. Do you honestly need to have it spelled out for you? I honestly dont care about some random stranger online to educate them. Not worth my time to debate with Shapiro fan boys
Niel: *laughs* “Mr Shapiro, if you only knew how ridiculous that statement is, you wouldn’t have said it.”
Listen, that comment punched Shapiro in the gut and ran away with his lunch money.
Bro that was the weakest thing said the whole time. Ben had a valid point and he just ducked the question by saying that.
@@lethanielsimpson641 Neil was right though
@@tiagobrandao6588 On what point was he right
@@lethanielsimpson641 Neil plays the role of the opposition is his interviews. That fact is stated in this video. So yes, it's ridiculous for Shapiro to say Neil has a leftist bias
@@lethanielsimpson641 that he himself (neil) isn't a lefty. he's a conservative party member.
Ben Shapiro DESTROYS BBC's Schedule by LEAVING interview early.
It should have been easy to challenge him then
You stole that comment boi
I usually dont laugh at these anymore but you made me do a spit take with that one
Alright that's funny 😂
Shapiro talks too fast. He needs to go slow if he's gonna take on that much BBC. No wonder he quit early
The main problem is that Ben found a disagreement where there wasn't any and so he ended up debating himself. And as always he has won the argument, against himself. The guy on BBC just had to sit and not say anything.
@Burning City You fell into the exact same trap Ben did, the reason people laugh him out of the water is because Andrew is a very farcry from a leftist. That's like Trump calling Fox leftist.
What do you mean the guy on BBC just had to sit back and say nothing.
Andrew Neil wasn’t even trying to have a debate or an argument. He was doing his job, asking tough questions, and Ben Shapiro just unraveled himself.
Cathy Newman had an agenda, and sequences of question used to antagonize Jordan Peterson. The same thing happened in this BBC 'interview' but the difference is, Shapiro took the bait and didn't handle it well.
Regarding your comment, officially it was an interview, but read the questions man
Eoin Smith He would have done the same thing if he had a left wing guest on. That’s what he does.
@@eoinsmith1996 Have you ever even seen an Andrew Neil interview besides this one?
Bruh all of his questions sounded like he just went on twitter and looked through each and every controversial Ben Shapiro tweet that looks bad out of context and in this interview he decided to use them to try and beat Ben since he couldn't win a regular debate.
Geechy Guy It. Wasn’t. A. Debate
The biggest embarrassment for Ben in his argue with Andrew was that Andrew wasn't even arguing with him, and he still lost.
You can't lose an interview.
@@clayhunter2572 Ben Shapiro seems to be an exception to that rule then
@@nctsgrass I don't know about that - I mean, have you seen Jonathan Swan's utter dismantling of Das Orange Anus, Das Gropenfuhrer Donald Jackass Drumpf?
Just saying!
@@clayhunter2572 did you watch the interview?
@@clayhunter2572 after experiencing 2020, 2021 and this part of 2022...anything is possible.
Ben's mistake is simple. He got pissed.
Talking to some people is like watching paint dry..
@Fried Rice No, check out his interview with Piers Morgan. Last time I checked, Piers is older than 20, and Ben easily won.
@@jzgamer3284 Also, Piers Morgan is an utterly useless "political" interviewer - seriously, all he's known for in Great Britain is co-hosting Britains' Got Talent.
JustTheBeginning Shapiro always comes off as pissed. He is like the little yappy dog that won’t shut up because someone is walking down the sidewalk a block and a half away. He just cannot help himself.
Ben's mistake was simple. He couldn't defend what he said in the past, because he STILL believes it. He's never apologized for what he's said. He's apologized because he didn't get the response he thought he would.
Ben Shapiro lost a debate to a guy not even trying to debate him.
He called Andrew Neil a leftist 😅😅
Most of the questions were about things he's said in the past, he basically lost and argument against him self
@@declanfoley7562 Well, Americans are weird. Leftists in America are rightists in Britain.
That’s how bad he is at arguing.
Then again shapiro is just an bad clown.
1:02 - "...And I asked you a question, you failed to answer a single one of mine.", says the *interviewee* . Does he even know how an interview works?
Sooo he cant ask questions?
Not on the BBC, no. The interviewer in this case Andrew Neil isn't allowed by law to give his personal opinion, it's a state run corporation and has to stay impartial. When interviewing someone giving one view, in this case pro life, he has to counter argue, whether that's actually his personal belief or not.
@@jzxx57 Do you not know how interviews work?
@Mobile Gamer so you don't know how interviews work, huh?
@@pppoopoo4880 Oh ok mr knowalot tell me how interviews work then.
I think Ben is a master when it comes to debating.....with college students.
Lmaooo
He literally has won every debate besides this one against "adults"
masterdebater
And Cenk at Politicon.
In an auditorium... With speakers.... And the only person who has a microphone is him
Ben Shapiro must be so used to arguments by now that he couldn't understand the concept of an interview...
So that asks the question... How was he destroyed in an interview. I like him, but this embarrassing.
@@bubbybumble616 You're absolutely correct about Andrew Neil - he IS extremely right-wing for a British journalist, but he treats everybody in exactly the same way...
@@bubbybumble616 Either that, or "he" had a moment of revelation that being a, y'know, Jewish Nazi is NEVER going to be a good look...
I'm so sorry but what does right wing mean
@@christopherjobin-official7440 He wasn't even destroyed here. The problem is that Neil started taking the "interview" out of context. He started using tweets from the past, which is what the left does. Oddly enough, ret**ds think that the Neil is from the right, he is actually a democrat by US terms, but considered right leaning in Britain.
He called Andrew Neil a liberal. Ben came in unprepared and was very defensive. This wasn't a college student he could talk circles around, this was a life-long conservative.
Well the interviewer didn't know him either and he's the one who onvited him. So he should have at least watched a few videos of Ben. And also Ben can not know the interviewer because those informations are not given when your interviewed. Plus the person is only famous in UK soooooooooooooooooo
@@hjl4204 Producers for these shows have to brief presenters and guests, so they likely did know a bit about each other beforehand, although you should do your own research as well. It's possible they either didn't listen to producers or ignored briefs they gave them beforehand
@@TwelvetreeZ that makes sense(or is it sence?)
@Burning City
He was playing Devil's Advocate the whole time. He's a pro-lifer. His goal was to get Ben Shapiro to show his European audience what American conservatism was and how it differed from conservatism in Europe. Ben was letting his emotions get the best of him. That's all there is to it.
@Burning City Bro that's kind of cringe
Thank you for making these free videos. I have learned a lot from your videos.
Urh Brvar free of ads?
Parker Dolan 😹😹😹
@@P9rkour90 adblock?
~ Our pleasure! Glad you're getting value from them. :-)
Emilia Clarke’s smiles are just so lovable.
But does he know another person that does?
Big pp facts
was just gonna comment this lol
Unfair! Half your likes are sponsored by Théoden.
@@Quinceps You better be careful or Theoden may try to find you.
Ben Shapiro came up against a grown-up, professional interviewer and couldn't deal with it. He even resorted to "I'm more popular than you" as an avenue to try and "win". Sad.
I suppose if Taylor Swift is more popular than Ben then she wins ?
@@lewisner ”why cant you just admit you're on the left?” LMAOOO WEAK.
Susan Webb yes, it was. and ben shapiro is a lot more childish so get over it 🙂
It just shows how weak ben really is
He doesn't even let ben shapiro speak, and can't even answer his questions.
Ben Shapiro did lose this debate... he went from being an adult to a man-child lol "I'm more popular than you!" what are you, Ben? An insecure teenager?
Yes
Yes, yes he is
I made that same argument once when I got mad in grade 2. Lmaoo.
He’s insecure but his wife is a doctor! Remember his wife is a doctor guys
Evan R maybe his rich family force some arrange marriage. Poor the woman.
I watched this when it was originally on, another major mistake Shapiro made was to forget it was a UK audience & compared Neil he was the lesser known and so his comment was doubly embarrassing.
He relies on his fast, aggressive speech to appear to be in a superior position. When challenged by someone prepared, not even in an arranged debate, he loses his apparent cool.
Emila Clark is a graduate of William Shatner's school for kids who look good but act wood.
@Jenny G accurate, and it terrifies me the cult following he has amassed.
@Jenny G He needs a dark cell or a lobotomy. Let's have no half measures for this one.
@@DR-hy6is ben shapiro is smarter than you lefties
@@jamescunningham1844 That's why he tried to make an interview into a debate, right? That's why he went on this show without knowing anything about the interviewer or their political leanings, right? That's why he humiliated himself and anyone who thinks of him as an intellectual in such a stunning, damning manner, right? He is just that smart. LOL.
the moment you get overly defensive, you lose.
@U mad Bro How do you know he has low IQ?
U mad Bro U mad bro?
BUT I HAVE INSECURITY ISSUES
@U mad Bro Save your sympathy for Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro - he needs it most.
It feels like you have a bit too much Emilia Clarke footage on hand...lol
Hahaha
I think it's because they did an analysis a few weeks back on how to be charming using her as an example, so they would already have a lot of footage of her saved ... But I agree, without that context it makes it look like Charlie has a massive crush (who could blame him?)
Using this footage for research purposes
No such thing
Can’t blame him, really.
*ben Shapiro loses debate
Me: wait wasn’t that an interview
@John Banks You don't come on an interview to be called out or criticized, you do so to be interviewed
THANK YOU. I was like “only Ben Shapiro can actually ‘lose’ an interview.”
It turned into a debate because Ben Shapiro decided to question the interviewer.
it was not an interview, the interviewer was quoting 5year old tweets of ben shapiro and acting like those were his views, the funny thing is that ben tells him and the audience that he had realised that these were wrong and even made a whole website in wich he lists them as wrong but ofc everybody ignores that
@@adellexmiles3155 it turned into a debate because the interviwer accused Ben about making offensive statements several years ago
I like how he shows Emilia Clarke when he is trying to explain smiling😆♥️
I want to become one with Emilia Clarke
@@behindthen0thing Don't we all?
@@behindthen0thing we can make a religion out of this
@@benjaminramsey498
ಠ_ಠ
@@friedlemons5201 THE SUN IS A DEADLY LASER
Love how you're showing Emilia as a good example of a smile, she has the most beautiful and charming smile!
simp
Kylirr incel
@@albertbarese4170 don't care virgin
@@Kylirr Wow, that's VERY grown-up, isn't it? How old are you - sixteen?
When Ben made the claims over him being left winged and Andrew Neil laughed that is because he actually supports the Conservative party and was Chairman of the Federation of Conservative Students which are centre right, not left winged 🤣 Facts may not care about your feelings but clearly little Benjamin over here doesn't know the facts.🤣
Left and right wing in Britain and America are totally different.
@@topspur762 FACTS 🙌
@@topspur762 Left and right wing in the majority of the world is different to the US. Neil definitely isn't left-wing.
@@topspur762 Yes. But that doesn't mean hes a leftist.
Topspur76 Well that’s a given but they do have a lot of similarities. They may differ on gun laws and such, but when it comes to foreign policy and immigration they are very much alike
Ben Shapiro DESTROYS himself with CONJECTURE and ASSUMPTIONS
Ben Shapiro COMMITTS SUICIDE
Jakan1404 oh no
Ben Shapiro TRIPS and breaks his NOSE rendering him UNSUITABLE for Television
@@RailwayScholar hr destroyed himself being a Pro Zionist
Ben shapiro was badly humiliated and looked like a man child in this interview when he said to the interviewer "im more popular than you"
It was already bad enough when he called the most conservative journalist in the U.K a leftist. And yet it got worse...
@@mattclayer6541 he was mistaken because he didnt know who he was and he took the position of a leftist. but he did use that as an insult too lol.
How was he humiliated? That's just your opinion lol. Doesn't look like he was humiliated at all
@@i.o4766of course you can't see it mate cuz it flew right above you head
@Spence how was he? i don't see how he was. there should be nothing he should be ashamed for.
I appreciate the segment about genuine smiles had all examples of Emilia Clarke. 😍
Emiliaaaaa
@@emperorbartu2414 right?! 😁
I only somewhat regret I didn't get into G.o.T. at the beginning of the series 10 years ago.
@@ilichiregius2884 damn right
@@ilichiregius2884 It's never too late to start
"When the debate is lost, Slander becomes the tool of the loser"-Socrates.
America Then let’s not ignore the fact that the interviewer started with “some of your views seem to take us back to the Dark Ages”
Yes, losing a debate pushes you towards it, but a conversation can fall into circles and insults at nearly any time.
Sow-Crates!
Andrew Smith ok and my point was that he started the slander, not that he was discussing his own views.
*_"I'm popular and you're not!"_*
-Preppy girls in teen films and Ben Shapiro
"I'm popular and you're not, therefore my point is more valid than yours."
Arrogance at its finest, folks.
Preppy girls in high school as well, lol
Gosh it's just like middle school😂
@@electr_icity4613 when did he say that in the interview?
Matthew Hall
he says it here in the video 9:16
y i k e s
4:04 he actually lied. He has and had DESTROY titles in his own channel
I think he tried to say that he doesn't name his videos
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
@@skinniemcfats5292 last free country?? keep dreaming chump
@@skinniemcfats5292 he literally is on the right, he holds right wing views and is a member of the Conservative party.
Ngl the only thing Ben did wrong was get angry and insult him. If he’d have kept his cool his points were actually kind of true
When he called Andrew Neil left wing I felt the entire UK collectively laugh
well they dont have guns in the UK I dont think any of you qualify as conservative. most of the world is to the left.
@@wadeobryan4175 Yeah. 'cause it's not like Andrew Neil once posited that, as HIV isn't really a problem for heterosexuals, it isn't really a problem at all, is it?
@@richardsmart5532 Yeah I feel Americans think the ease of access to guns defines a country's political viewpoint, and nothing else matters
@@scottbuchanan8300 the American conservatives are always far right.
@@octopuss1918 Yeah, definitely the ones who are on the news etc., but I'd hope there were some members of the public who aren't for their country's sake
Ben Shapiro was destroyed with *Facts and logic*
*We are trully in the end times now*
NightWolf Jr. *We're in the Endgame now*
The End is near
Well. He is often right, but take his religious discussions for example... Putting it generously, he falters.
@@TheIfifi He's right about 7% of the time and that's when he's making obviously true statements (most often to try and defend an unreasonable position).
NightWolf Jr. GOOD TIME TO PURGE DEMORATS ANTIFA MUSLIMS Pakistanis tlaib n Omar BLACK lives matter
Back to basic good human values.
1) Joke it off, take things easy.
2) Don't judge others.
3) Don't keep grudges.
4) Speak for others to understand, not dominate others.
And Ben fails at all of this literally all the time.
Nah I speak to dominate ... Only the weak speak to understand
Speaking with jokes weaken your point and makes you like you're covering something you don't know or that you get straight to jokes to cover the fact that you're starting to not making sense
But I agree with the other once except that when sometimes you have the right evidence to show that the person who's arguing with you is in fact not what he described him self and that he trying to investigate and take information from you , you need to expose this person and confront him like Ben did with that interviewer from the UK because in America people like that person is probably in the left and the way he investigate Ben's tweets and RUclips videos when the interview is infact on the new book of Shapiro "The right side of history" showed that he wanted to show that Ben was wrong and that he's a reactionary conservative
What's a good human being?
@@Alisguitar stfu virgin. You probably stutter ordering food
@@TrollThings247 Sounds like you are projecting.
I don't know how it's possible to lose an interview, but boy, Ben sure accomplished it.
Well, now we have Das Orange Anus utter slow-motion car-crash with Jonathan Swan as well.
Just saying!
This is why he mostly does college campus talks.
To brainwash college students their college debt is good for them.
american youth, bunch of morons.
Except for his interviews every Sunday.
Except for bill maher, cenk uygur, Joe Rogan, Sam Harris, piers morgan, don lemon. He does mostly college campus because his target audience is millennials
the average millenial is 30
That's why he doesn't want debate with actual intellectuals who have better experience than him. If he does an actual debate with a famous intellectual, he'll get destroyed with facts and logic.
British journalism isn't America's cup of tea.
I don’t think British anything is the world tea. Movies. Tv. Music. Video games.
New Ant I wouldn’t say so. The Inbetweeners is quite popular outside of the UK and British music has always been popular although not everyone likes it e.g. The Beatles, One Direction.
I'm British and I find British interviewers very irritating and dishonest. Their sole goal seems to be to constantly attack and belittle the interviewee rather than actually give them a platform to discuss their views in an honest way.
New Ant Yeah, nobody liked the Beatles or James Bond...
@@Anon-nv7bp the point of journalism isn't to give someone a platform. If someone wants a platform, they can make RUclips videos or go one someone's podcast. Journalism's purpose is to hold people accountable.
This is why he always debates college students with no media training.
I think he also debated on Live TV and destroys people in arguement. Like the one with Zoey tur
He's debated numerous people who have been trained to debate. Issue is, he couldnt win this because there was nothing to win, it was an interview, not a debate. Hence, because he came in looking for a progressive debate, nothing moved forward, annoying him.
@@splash8594 he lost whatever it was
@@mr.stealyogirl4078 you can't lose if it's not a competition. Though he was in the wrong, I admit, because he came for a debate when there want one
@@splash8594 debate,argument whatever you wanna call it he lost
The Prime Minister wont even do an interview with andrew neil. He's a beast. Ben shapiro didnt stand a chance. Man and boy.
He’s good at digging up dirt on people
Tbh our PM avoids any investigation
BBC- "you have strong opinions on abortion that some people think are wrong"
Ben- "is that like a personal attack or something?"
Good one, I smirked
Tyler Reed I think he said his positions were barbaric. That IS an attack.
@@joeydoherty368 Um, no, Andrew never said "barbaric" - wittle Benjamina Aaron Shitpiro used the word "barbaric" . Seriously, watch the video again if you don't believe me...
@Cheap Skate Also, I live in Edinburgh, Scotland and I'm MORE THAN HAPPY TO PAY MY TV LICENCE (WHICH COSTS £154.50 PER YEAR IF YOU HAVE A COLOUR TELEVISION, OR £52 A YEAR, IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE LIVING IN THE 1970'S AND HAVE A BLACK-AND-WHITE SET.)
I'm particularly happy to pay FORTY-TWO PENCE A DAY for it when the BBC produce brilliant content like this.
Also, if you can't receive BBC programmes, you don't have to pay anything.
Also, ever considered, say, posting in English, rather than gibberish?
Ben smirks in a lot of his debates because he’s trying to get the other person to get emotional he only does it when he starts to lose and the other person will get emotional
btm56841 hard to lose when you debate college students and cherrypicked your facts.
btm56841 nope try again. It is cherry picking I wonder if you actually check the source he uses when he debates. Talking fast with Cherry picked facts does not equate to being right he just wants to win the argument not be right in most cases he’s not right.
@btm56841 think i found ben shapiro 😂
btm56841 It was indeed and interview, and yet Ben managed to lose it.
btm56841 if u act like a whiny little brat like ben did then u definitely can lose an interview
I can't believe Ben thought the facts cared about his feelings
🤣👍
It's the only time I've seen him lose though. But it's good to be humbled from time to time.
jry611 only time? Oh boy....
@@jry611 lol that must have been the only interview/debate you watched of his.
@@jr5296 who did he lose to? Maybe I just didnt see it. But safe to say he wins most.
When Ben said " I am popular and you are not" I was like wow
His inner Regina George was coming out."you can't sit with us"
I love how all the genuine smiles are Emilia Clarke’s HAHAHA
Whenever I see Emilia Clarke smiling, I feel good.
It's a shame she can't inject any of that authenticity into her acting
Her eyes turn into little moons....amazing
She is the smile icon 💜
True... I adore her....
*inserts compilation of Emilia Clarke being adorable*
He tried to pull that sneaky one XD
Dude got a hardore crush on this girl, he features her in every video
Well... She is really cute lol
Really can't blame him
@@ida305 who doesn't, she's the embodiment of happiness.
Ben Sharpio DESTROYED by FACTS and LOGIC
And you need a basic lesson in basic comprehension, it’s clear.
There wasn’t one FACT or SHRED of logic Andrew managed to say. Watch the video again with your brain turned on, for a change.
Cool blue water0708 it’s a joke dude
Finn O’Rourke what’a a joke?
@@Coolbluewater-iz2dv silence stan
Using Emilia Clarke has an example of genuine happiness and kindness brings me joy. She's always so happy looking
I dont trust people who’s confirmation bias controls their mind. Shipiro doesn’t consult any sources of info other than his own and fails to listen to other points of view and take them into perspective. He thinks hes always right and immediately rejects points of view that are contrary to his. Listen more than you talk and you just might learn something.
It's hard to argue against another point if you don't even understand it. Ben likes to think he understands literally everything and doesn't want to admit he might not know what he doesn't know. He HAS to feel like hes the smartest person in the room, treats every conversation like an argument lol.
Jade L fr, how r u gonna try to say science is the reason u don’t believe in abortion when ur religious
Ben Shapiro cites sources more than any other speaker I've ever seen. Have you watched his videos? He cites scientific studies, laws, court rulings, historical political occurrences, and just about every relevant thing you can think of. Not sure why you say he doesn't consult any sources. He believes very strongly in what he believes in and is very confident in it, but considering his extreme success in debates and the points that he makes during said debates, it is easy to see why. This is the closest thing to "losing" a debate Ben Shapiro has, and he didn't even lose a debate. None of his arguments or points were countered, the other guy wasn't even debating him in the first place, he just got really pissed off for some reason and left the debate. But given how calm and collected he is during his other debates, I think he probably had something else going on outside of the debate. The guy has done and won hundreds of debates at this point all of which he has remained cool for. It isn't surprising that he had a bad day for one of them.
@@zachary7897 I like Ben Shapiro. I like his demeanor in some of his debates, and I agree with him on some of his stances. What OP is talking about is confirmation bias, and I can definitely see that in a lot of what he says. If you don't know, confirmation bias is have a preconceived idea, and then gathering evidence (actual facts, like what Shapiro uses in most of his arguments) to support this idea. It's completely in contrast to the objective approach, where you get the evidence, you weigh in other factors that work against or hand in hand with the evidence, and then come to a conclusion.
@@sapowoman so refreshing to see critical thinking. Thank you. Ben shaprio and his followers can't seem to grasp this idea.
Ben Shapiro talks fast because otherwise people have time to think about what he says. That never goes well.
lol
I'm sorry but despite you agreeing with him or not he does say A LOT of uncomfortable truths some people would rather ignore or act as if things weren't there, which is inherent to being smart regardless of your ideology, you know, you can't ignore what you see or feel, and it's more difficult to deceive oneself. But then there's the other side of that, in which your bias modifies your 'factual' statements, your wishes in certain fuzzy or arguable matters getting in the way of your interpretation, which happens to the best of us, hence why even the most renowed intellectuals ever have rejected the term 'objectivity'. Plus there's also a huge part of things that is merely an opinion he strongly defends, and you can defend, but saying 'that never goes well' is ridiculous because he's more right than he's wrong.
Just change the playback speed and listen. What he says makes sense.
I'm talking about the people in the room. They don't have the chance to slow him down. He'll say three vaguely intelligent sounding things one after another to rush what may be inaccuracies past a trusting audience., often stringing unconnected facts together with faulty logic.
Rob Friesen I disagree but it’s not a big deal. Anyway I really want some ice cream!
People loved this so much because Ben has made a living based on "owing" people. He likes "debating" against under prepared and emotional college students and making them look like fools. While the video was fun to watch, because Ben is just unbearably smug sometimes. I still think is shows that Ben is apart of the problem with the new media.
@Davida no one said college students are not on his level, they definitelly are. Lol
Davida quite a bit of what Ben says when debating college kids are wrong or misrepresented, but the kids don’t know that so they go along with it and Ben’s fans are like”facts don’t care about your feelings”
@Davida It's pretty obvious the people you're replying to are satisfied with their image of Ben and don't care for a much more honest one. No point here
Haha I think you mean “a part” not “apart”!
@Davida When has he ever debated someone worth their salt?
Ben absolutely loves to use the emotional part. Everytime he is speaking to some young students or sjws he tries to offend them until they get emotional and he can show them off as crazy
That's why people should never lower to that level.
its because by saying something completely rational and correct is enough to trigger these snowflakes
@@BerrysTC Nah, by invalidating their personal experiences (which would normally matter to determine the matter he’s “debating”), brush important points aside, grasp at strawmans, and twist the meanings of their words.
@@nullvoid6095 Also, come up with statistics you just make up on the spot.
Facts don’t care about Ben’s feelings.
😂😂
Say it louder for people in the back!!!
Just because you don't win a argument dosent mean you arent on the right side
Mani, I guess It was supposed to be a joke, not an mind-blowing insight.
@@basicallyhell4150 LMFAO
Ben Shapiro is so anticharismatic 🙄
And he forgot he was in a interview, not in a debate.
YES. Thank you. I'm so glad this video was made. I'm tired of people trying to say he's a great debater. He isn't. He uses dirty tricks that are blatantly obvious to anyone who is being even slightly intellectually honest. His "charisma" is just smarmy, overbearing bullying.
@@SeanCRiley Yeah, being able to talk fast is charisma apparently
What is your idea being charismatic? Those who are charismatic often those are the one who gets the most attention, and having different ideologies and proposing a different one, unlike the most of the people do, and i know he good at that, and yes he is not a full-charismatic one, he's not persuasive,manipulative, and exerting situations, speech,listening,making your big points, holding the emotion and control every aspect of other people these are the abilities of charismatic people and much more
@@xasparovj0222 A fair question. Charisma is the quality of winning people over with charm and grace. It literally comes from the Greek _kharisma_ , meaning "favor" or "grace". There is no grace in what Shapiro does. He doesn't win people over, he steamrolls over them. He is good at making a lot of noise and being controversial, and those can be great qualities for a showman whose only aim is getting attention (which I believe is exactly what he is trying to do). But it doesn't make him charismatic, and it doesn't make him a skilled debater.
but an interview doesn't really involve shitting on the person you are interviewing.
Emelia Clarke has a really contagious smile :)
“Emelia”!?
@Burning City You made me smile too. Have a good one :)
@Burning City Im sure you do, Drogon
@Jack Wall it's rare to see a genuine smile in Hollywired
You can break it down any way you like, the simple fact is that Shapiro went into an interview thinking he was the superior intellect. He didn't do his homework, he had absolutely no idea who was interviewing him, he basically went in with the American attitude and got schooled. Andrew has been a conservative since before Ben was born, and Andrew has been a quality journalist since before Ben was a glint in the milkmans eye.
Or just don't turn an interview into am argument😁😁
The thing is, that's Ben's gimmick. He gives no f*cks about truth or conversation; it's all just pageantry to him. To be fair this channel is about analyzing that pageantry, and it's a helpful augmentation for when you have valid points to make, but when you don't care about truth like Shapiro it also fuels sophistry.
Ben turns almost everything he gets on into an argument fella.
That's more up to the person conducting the interview than the person being interviewed.
Exactly
seriously, thank you. all ben had to do was answer the questions, ben was so uninformed on who the host was he didnt even know that andrew neil was conservative, so he assumed it was some opponent hurling gotcha questions at him, obviously he is giving ben a chance to defend and justify his positions and ben is taking it as an attack.. so he got overly defensive and missed the entire purpose of the exchange.
neil is not unaware of how the internet works, the titles he was talking about are coming from daily wire that he runs, not just people creating sjw cringe compilations. the daily wire channel titles those debates n discussions the same way, and essentially started it. strangers with no connection to shapiro title their videos of people losing debates this way because of that.
idk this interview was a mess, and i think ben needs to have more exchanges with figures that actually have poise, as opposed to the whiny college kids that get easily flustered with no media training he's too accustomed to.
Haha suckers! I dont even get into arguments because i dOnT EvEr tAlk tO PeOplE
This man is a genius
*modern problems require modern solutions*
"sUCkERs?!"
Is that an insult?? Is that an argumentive TOnE I sENse???
lol, jk.
BigA2K 😉💯
BigA2K
hahaha never heard this joke or any type of joke like this before 😂😂😂👌🏻👌🏻🔥🔥💪🏻😆😂🔥🔥😂👌🏻💪🏻👌🏻💪🏻😂💪🏻😆🔥😆😆😆😆👌🏻💪🏻😆😬🔥😆😆💪🏻🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥😂💪🏻👌🏻😆😂😆👌🏻💪🏻😆😂💪🏻👌🏻😆😂💪🏻🔥🔥🔥🔥😂😂😂😂😂😆😆👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
This channel has changed my life so quickly. I've worked so hard to mold myself into a respectable person and I never really knew what I was doing, and now hearing these things put into words just really helped me shape how I view the world and how I view myself. Anyway, I really appreciate all the work and teaching your channel does 🖤🖤
Its just that Ben became mainstream becuz of memers, so a large portion of every day millenials put him in a pedestal.
When your own tweets are so gross that when they're read back to you, they offend you to the point of throwing a tantrum and leaving
Literally! Lets not forget that Shapiro has said that he is fully okay with civilian deaths in war as long it progresses his respective parties' agenda
The tweets aren't what he was mad about but go off hater.
@@clayhunter2572 Otvali, arsehole - blagodaryu vas, KKKretin...
Love how you keep saying people "felt" like he lost... it wasn't even a debate it was an interview, he lost because he threw a tantrum and left. There's no "feeling" about it.
C Ben Shapiro is a very good debater but I agree, he totally lost his cool
He losta debate with someone who wasnt debating him.....
Yeah that really throw me off on this video. He lost, simply because he took offense from non argumentative questions just like a snowflake he often likes to talk about.
I've never seen someone get mad at a video for not treating opinion as objective fact.
But he didn't lose. At no point was he speechless. He left bc he was done talking to him and didn't care anymore
"what went wrong for ben?"
Instead of answering a question made by the interviewer he started to rumbling about why Andrew Neil is a leftist and therefore he doesn't deserve an answer.
The thing is Neil is pretty right wing here in the uk
Well Neil brought up random tweets made by Ben from 5-10 years ago, even after Ben has denounced them
As far as I know the interviewer guy isn't even left wing.
@Burning City I honestly don't know. Never heard of him before that interview.
@Burning City far left??? Leftist??? Can you even define those terms??? 😂😂😂😂
"Im popular and youre not" geez..i used to admire ben so much. This is shocking.
Why did you ever admire daft wee Benny? Seriously, it manages, somehow, to combine being Jewish with being a Nazi, and that is NEVER going to be a good look, is it?
Dragonetta well he doesn’t anymore.. says a lot about you to have the audacity to throw that last snobby line in buddy.
Yeah maybe he finally got angry for once, he isn’t perfect alright. Just because he messed up during this interview doesn’t mean he is a terrible person. Also notice he never showed more then five seconds of the video at a time. We never saw what led up to the heated debate
Richard Smart so now someone is a nazi if they are mean for 1 interview. I think you might need to look at a history book or just a definition of what a nazi is.
Jack R the full interview is on RUclips, it’s only 16 minutes long. As someone who watched it Ben definitely came across as an emotion snobby child. He was being interviewed not debated and tried to constantly attack Andrew for asking a question, just overall came across as an emotional being. You are welcome to watch the original video though.
So stop being Ben Shapiro - got it. Now if only we can get Ben Shapiro to follow that advice.
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
@StoicNote I've noticed that Skinnie replies to almost every thread that trashes Ben, they're obviously emotionally provoked fans of his.
👏👏👏
he sounds like an angry robot
He sounds like a sick squirrel who got hooked on Red Bull
Damn!!! I laughed so hard😂😂
Wrong! Robots have something called a logic board that helps them calculate their next action, be is just a 4 year old who always got what he wanted and now someone is telling him no and he cannot accept it.
Sounds!?!? The dude is a robot
Or worse... A liberal...
Ben comes off as smug and pompous in every interview
Agreed 100%. It's hard to agree with what he says even when it's true because how his tone comes off. It's one of the reasons I can't watch any of his interviews or even his show.
Which doesn't equate into being wrong. It's just your inferiority complex getting the best of you
@@David93434 Wow another wannabe psychologist.
@@David93434 If you want to be agreed with, there are certain ways to convey your thought. You can have the universal truth in your hands, but if you're incapable of debating, your truth isn't worth shit.
@@tatpik2 Ben IS smug and pompous. He is also right most of the times. If people can't handle it and need to be offended that's their problem. If you think it takes a psychologist to get this or have an opinion then that says a bit about you too
Thank you for showing the clips of Emilia Clarke smiling, it made me smile
Edit: 2:06 - 2:24
She honestly just brightens my day
I have watched some of Ben Shapiro's debates to see how he DESTROYS the other person, but he talks so fast and others try to talk over him and vice versa I end up not understanding anything.
Exactly. He just uses cheap tricks and avoids skilled debaters.
😂🤣😭 Me.
exactly. Thats what it means to be DESTROYED these days. To speak over your opposition at every opportunity
thats what happens when a lizard debates with a college student
Duh Im a dope, therefore Ben must be wrong because i dont understand and he talks to fast for my pea brain. Slow down playback if your struggling with limited intelligence.
Needs to talk about a genuine smile.
* Cue the Emilia Clark footage *
Ben Shapiro sound like he only breathes helium
Dakotah Cox man reps gas giant gang
😂 makes sense since he's a straight up clown
lololol i.......stop it
Low quality comment, helium increases vocal pitch, it doesn’t cause you to think and speak faster.
HAHAHAH
Hey Charlie, could you make a video on how to avoid unnecessary fights/ how to deal with such situations ?
Leave the room
@@Lksz-l9k That's essentially what Ben did, but Charisma on Command have him grief for it. 🤨 Very disappointed in this analysis.
@@enshala6401 What happens if you are in a situation where you can't leave.
@@velucadhirim6725 well it's a good question, and I guess it depends on the circumstance. I am really surprised CoC was critical of Ben Shapiro, but they were celebrating Robert Downey Jr's exit from an interview under very similar circumstances. CoC should make up their minds. 😬
But back to your question, I think if there is no exit option, then there must be some commensurate "rules of engagement" that would have helped him to keep the conversation on track. The Kavanaugh hearings provide an example of this. The main point is to prevent people from talking over one another.
@@velucadhirim6725 then don't leave and face the situation, running away is usually no permanent solution.
He tried to start an argument in a interview
You should do a video on Keanu Reeves’ charisma. Would be great to watch.
Second this
He’s wonderful 😊
Not to mention Keanu's lack of aging. Dude is a fountain of youth.
I also support this.
Keanu Reeves as he is a great actor but he's an internet phenomenon at the moment, i hardly think he's that charismatic to make a video about him
Ben Shapiro is the polar opposite of a charismatic person.
oks Iva But did he DeStRoY them? No, why would someone so weak go on the offense. I hate Bill Maher, but he really made a fool out of some of Ben’s childish statements.
@@greatcesari not really lol
Ben Shapiro is a skilled debater. It's the kind of person you don't necessarily agree with, but you really can't find a way to disprove what they say. (Without resorting to childish tantrums...)
@@jokestar2577 Well, you can disprove what he says, especially when the debate veers towards something that is more subjected by personal opinion than pure data. Like abortion for example. But his problems is that he really is a bully that doesn't leave space for debate, just rushes the conversation.
@@DerpEye what do you mean his abortion argument is "subjective"? abortion is 100% objective. it's killing an innocent life and no excuse can be made for it
Ben's too used to arguing with uninformed college students; being interviewed with probing questions is way outside of his wheelhouse.
Absolutely. That being said, he really did have a bad day or something, regardless of the questions themselves. He could have definitely done better even if he had been out of his territory.
He graduated from Harvard Law. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean they're a buffoon. He had a bad day. That's it. Relax, m8.
@@kungfoochicken08 I don't care about his day or education. Having a law degree doesn't make an SS officer less guilty.
Sam Harris is an uninformed college student? Cenk Uyger is an uninformed college student? Joe Rogan is uninformed college student? Andrew Yang is an uninformed college student? Bill Maher is an uninformed college student?
kungfoochicken08 only uninformed students would put that much weight on where someone graduated from. What Ben is good at is making himself sound intelligent to naive and uninformed people.
Ben Shapiro: I'm like a smart guy in the US
TV Host: we eat people like you for breakfast here in the UK
Exactly
Hahahhaha... no.
US meets Europe lol
Andrew Neil has long been one of the stewards of the decline of conservatism in the United Kingdom. He pretends hes on the right, but he isnt. We call them rhinos here in the last free country. Wake up, quickly.
@@skinniemcfats5292 England is a country built on the blood of other countries so please shut your trap regarding it being the last free country
Ben Shapiro: I will reduce this conversation down to it's last atom! Lmao
Looool I see what u did there
Zhufu Edits yeah its perfectly balanced like all conversations should be
Vincent Martinez Did you just laugh at your own joke lmao
Kemu the Emu yes i did lol
Ben Shapiro Gets DESTROYED by LITERAL NOBODY With FACTS and LOGIC
He did not prepare himself of the interviewer of his cultural background. In the US being right wing means you support banning abortion. He assumed same applies to other countries.
Yeah, but the classic Jewish view on pregnancy is that a foetus ISN'T A PERSON UNTIL IT'S BORN, which kinda begs the question: where does it get its' views from?
Not from a halachic standpoint, which is Jewish law
@@learntogrow6861 Google "abortion law in Israel" and get back to me.
Just a suggestion...
Ben Shapiro just needs a Snickers bar🍫
Haha was just thinking Ben losing is a bigger uppset than AJ v Ruiz
A Pepsi Would Work Better
But he's him
As well as a "safe space", obviously...
This is how smart Shapiro is, he didn't know the difference between a debate or an interview, he should go back to debating college kids. As they say if you can't run with the hounds go off and piss like a puppy.
Guess he got owned with facts and logic
oh my, the times are a changin'
Neither cared much for his feelings
Facts don´t care about Ben´s feelings.
@Davida THANK YOU
Davida. Yes, hence facts didn´t care about Ben´s feelings.
That, "nobody's ever heard of you," bit changed me from somebody who was impartial to Ben Shapiro to one who dislikes him. There is zero value in the court of public opinion and that statement alone undermines the entire idea of Shapiro being, "intellectual." It's interesting to see him get so triggered, but that's the inevitable result of this vitriol-based social discourse we have of this day and age. Shapiro says he's above it, but clearly we don't have as much respect for each-other as we all like to think.
So I guess you have the moral superiority and have never lost your cool before and said things you regret. It is laughable for you to think he is not intelligent because he lost his cool.
All the points he made were still solid if you take them by face.
This is what happens when Ben Shapiro gets into a debate with an actual adult instead of high school kids
Not only an actual adult - an EXTREMELY right-wing (by British standards) adult.
Just saying...
rsbmg exactly he failed in a nonexistent debate hey somehow he lost...
In an interview
This comment is actually underrated
While I understand what you mean I think it is more of a psychological thing. Ben walked in to the interview like it was a debate, which it clearly wasn’t so he was unconsciously looking for points that could have been made against him or points “arguing” with him, so it made him look like a really insecure person. While he started to get frustrated because there wasn’t any points to find so he started grasping at whatever sounded like an attack. This made him “lose” the “argument”.
rsbmg Call it what you will (or won’t), it was an exchange Ben clearly was uncomfortable with, and unprepared for. He got his cage rattled real good. Fun to watch
I’ve seen people lose debates but I’ve never seen someone lose an interview