Imagine a 10 year old watching this to win an argument with their siblings Disclaimer: I was ten when I posted this and I’m not deleting it because it was relatable at the time pls don’t judge lol
Staying calm and not letting your emotions overtake you in an argument is a huge advantage to keeping a clear head and responding efficiently. Easier said than done but extremely important.
“Understood Piers” exactly! I was having an argument with a coworker in which he repeatedly made contradictory statements in order to win. The best way to conclude is to just be content in your own view and accept that this person is not going to change for you. Showing respect, regardless of whether you respect the person!
@@jcbbbyou think that because your trying to “win” the conversation/debate the best thing to do is let them sink deeper into there contradictions and delusion the more polite, respectful and clear cut you are with your statements makes them seem like a barking dog whilst you seem like the patient owner waiting for the dog to tire itself out
When I was a child my father would yell at me when I did something wrong. He was a good dad, but this caused me to develop a problem where I shut down when someone starts yelling at me. This channel has helped me get over that struggle and remain calm and not back down. I sincerely appreciate your videos.
@@LauraR0ckzLolz some people are mean, some grew up with parents who did that, and it rubbed off, and some just have a hard time not yelling, thats just one of there struggles
@@LauraR0ckzLolz That’s exactly what I would do. I remember getting falsely accused of something by my 4th grade teacher and I chose to admit to it instead of sticking up for myself just so it would be over with sooner. Maybe that’s not the same way you feel, but you aren’t alone. I support you. And I wish the best for you on your journey.
I grew up in a similar family as well but with a highly narcissistic dad that would just make up whatever Bizzaro world story to fit his narrative headed to just dropping the hammer on me for nothing real. As an adult, I have put a massive amount of time and effort into learning to both communicate and debate. Now my family avoids having any form of heated discussions with me because I can shut down their nonsense in and then railroad them into looking like fools in seconds and never look like the bad guy for any of it.
Knowing how well to articulate one self and get over hard times is key to getting your head above waters. Most times in order to stay in check one would have to consistently keep improving and looking out for new ways and opportunities. Some of us have battles we are fighting inside but regardless we should stay strong and steadfast and keep your head up
I have had the pleasure of working with Zach M Demers for several years and have been consistently impressed with his ability to deliver results. He is a skilled investment advisor who is dedicated to his clients' success
I have had the pleasure of working with Zach M Demers for several years and have been consistently impressed with his ability to deliver results. He is a skilled investment advisor who is dedicated to his clients' success
Summary: 1-spot when they enter “fight mode” 2-watch a misquoting 3-beware of derailing interruptions 4-don’t steamroll concessions 5-catch any logic gaps 6-draw a conversational boundary 7-acknowledge and common ground 8-give yourself permission to change your mind
Wish this worked with woman....nr5-catch any logical gaps, wont help you because they then derail the conversation and act like their a victim and say you are attacking them....the worst part for men is that we want to get to a logical answer/conclusion/end as quick as possible. We speak factual,not emotionally. So this is good advice when speaking to most men, but not with women.
@@TurdFergusen how is he doing that? He interrupts and he goes OTT with analysis of people's words. But that's not asking for someone to sensor themselves. I never knew who he was until this interview. I think it's a bit strange that someone at 36 years old finds 18 year old girls more appealing than women in their mid 20s. Not sure when he said it. But that's girls just outta school. Even if he said it within the past 10 years, it's a bit young for him
Yo talk about bot accounts making the same exact comments at the same time across multiple videos, If you’re still searching for the book go find Jesus instead
I hate arguments. One of my close friends at the time came to my house and lashed out at me for saying I was disappointed she flaked on me. She came at me HARD saying I was selfish and a bad friend because her mom is an addict and I should know how much she’s struggling with that. The whole argument she kept throwing that at me and when I’d try to defend myself she’d come down harder because in her eyes I was a sociopath for even trying to defend myself. Her moms been an addict for 10 years and her brothers have cut her off. She chooses to remain in contact and be affected by her mom. Ultimately the way she came at me that day isn’t something I think I should ever experience with a friend, that level of emotional attack… hell no. She kept saying “I don’t think I can be friends with someone like you” and I was like that’s fine by me I definitely don’t want to be friends with you
Solid breakdown. The reason Andrew didn't change his mind was because he still believes in the sentiment of the things he said. He just knows going forward, to have an impact with his words, he has to phrase them in a less emotionally triggering way because of his popularity. Piers couldn't get that and wanted him to recant. Not changing your mind, for Andrew benefits his brand.
there's a difference between changing one's own mind, and getting the Spanish Inquisition treatment. that there was Spanish Inquisition (struggle session). everyone is obligated to stand their ground in the face of such an offense.
This is the most thoughtful comment I've seen so far in this comment section that resumes exactly what Andrew was trying to transmit with his interventions. You have my like sir.
@@crackwitz Rightly said. Give no ground in these environments. Jordan Peterson didn't, either. If you apologize even once, you're done. They always have killed the people that apologized.
It's very difficult to entertain the notion of another angle or difference of opinion when you're being interviewed by someone who's hostile and adversarial. Piers makes people want to be guarded as to them avoiding being baited into a "Gotcha" moment.
Agreed 100%. It would be different if Piers actually provided countering truthful reasons why Tate should recant his position but even IF he did, this would NOT be the time or place to recant because a big part of Tate’s brand is mental and testicular fortitude to withstand the onslaught of unpopularity. Like it or not, recanting, even if merited by Tate’s own principles, would be perceived as a loss of character on Tate’s part by his fans.
1. Ver cuando entran a modo pelea (desde el inicio te etiquetan como un problema / pelean contigo antes de que puedas explicar tu punto de vista) 2. Ser consciente de cuando comienzan a manipular tus palabras y no permitirlo, aclarar a lo que te refieres. 3. Cuando comienza a interrumpir, hacer una pausa, decir que entiendo a la otra persona y pedirle por favor que no me interrumpa. 4. Mantenerse calmado y no interrumpir 5. Estar atentos a las fallas en su argumentación 6. Poner límites en la conversación (ser directo y no hablar de lo que no quiero hablar) 7. Primero establecer los puntos en común y luego discrepar 8. Ser abierto de mente (no ver el cambiar de opinión como una debilidad)
IMO, the best way to win any argument is not even to win, but to get the person you are talking to understand what you are saying. The moment you become aggressive, or passive is when you have either escalated or removed yourself from the conversation, just stay neutral. It's ok to have an opinion on something and express emotion just don't force it upon the receiver. As someone who has been in many arguments, it never goes well when you both leave thinking nothing got settled or your point never got across.
i guess that's true but it's annoying if you're actually right. i don't mean right in a arrogant way, but when you're actually right or at least 99% right yet the person yelling at you is either incapable of understanding or deliberately chooses to not understand. i think those are just free loss situations.
@@strannick2212 often the facts and logic simply aren't relevant. someone may be married to a poor position, or refuse to change their position because it would make them look bad, or because they don't like you, or think you should be subservient to them regardless of their error.
I don’t agree with Tate on a lot of his takes, but you can’t deny he composes himself very well. He is very intelligent when it comes to social interactions. Look at his conversations with Xqc for example.
@@sgtcrusher66 Hmmm, his courses are a complete scam. He knows how to be right about everything to earn money. That's why he became muslim, for muslims to buy his courses and for him to earn even more AND for him to keep his social position, basically to keep being famous. That's why he became muslim to become more famous and not lose his fame. Open your eyes.
@@WSGVallove him or hate him, you can’t deny is is world class communicator. How else did you think he got so famous so quickly and reached the level of status and fame? I don’t agree with everything about Tate but I can give him his props. If your hatred blinds you so much to not acknowledge the skill, then it’s you that’s blind
The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, is also a great example of how and how not to conduct yourself in an argument/debate. While certain characters had their views clouded by bias, the single biggest takeaway I believe that came from this film is that you have to be willing to admit or at least realise that your views could be wrong on a given issue. I believe that when you enter an argument firstly you should go in with the mindset to listen and to understand and know that you could be wrong and secondly to figure out whether the person you are conversing with is of a similar mindset and is also willing to concede a view when proven wrong.
I came to notice a pattern here, that you'd most probably need these 90% of the time if you're ever getting interviewed by a western media, or anyone "trained" by their style/system of thoughts. For the most part I've seen interviews in other countries in other languages, people are actually discussing and understanding things rather than trying to demolish or cancel that person. It's slowly becoming apparent to me that these "interviewers" has someone pulling the strings, putting a leashed dog on these prime channels trying to cancel that person they interviewing. It's not about seeking the truth, modern media pushed by the western nations no longer about seeking the truth. A media that can convince people that a nation has WMD, who can convince people to justify their government to interfere with someone's country and caused millions of death, and so many other disgusting things for the past decades - how can I expect anything different as an output in return? That's the very definition of insanity.
Can confirm. News debates in Asian countries are often way more heated and unprofessional but they're not playing a game to goad you into a corner where you have to apologize or get cancelled It's just two people arguing very loudly lol but I'd take that over these duplicitous mind games
Also, watch out for "half-concessions". They'll start the sentence by agreeing with you and want you to agree with their point, and after you agree to it, they'll tie you into something else (usually putting you in a bad light) in the second sentence, strawmanning you. DON'T go back on what you agreed with, just expound on your opinion to more accurately describes your stance, while maintaining you still agree with the first point. Same with yes or no questions, feel free to answer than, just be ready to explain your opinion if they try to loop you into something. Always confirm that you agree with their first point, but *your* version of their second point, not theirs.
It does seem to be a characteristic of British media that the interviewer heavily leads the conversation and doesn't allow for much deviation from whatever question is being asked. This has both pros and cons of course. Jeremy Paxman is one of the best examples of this, he'll let someone talk at length if they're sticking to his question but he will interrupt the second they stop doing so or they say something he can pick up on. It's really refreshing as an American when it comes to interviewing politicans especially, as they will often try and answer a different question that suits them. British journalists are much less likely to let that fly than here in the US where the interviewer just let's them do what they want. However, when it comes to a person defending themselves from accusations or criticism, the British style certainly leads to more frustration and confrontation as the interviewer is much more able to push an agenda that may have been decided beforehand. Then you add Piers Morgan into that dynamic and you've got a 'spicy' interview haha
I am downloading this to be better at argument. Since I am really bad at expressing myself, because i was always interrupted since i was young when i wanna make my point.
You C on C guys are amazing! This was an extremely informative upload using two controversial characters to illustrate the topic perfectly. Very well balanced. I've watched loads of your vids... first time I've commented.
I'm not sure I agree with the last point. I don't disagree with the words "Give yourself permission to change your mind", but I think it's almost always both ethically and intellectually wrong to change your mind *during* an argument unless it is *very* clear that you were wrong. Changing your mind is like grooming yourself -- it should usually be done in private. Why? Because you don't actually have *time* during an argument to think it all the way through, especially in a medium (TV) where pausing to think about something for more than a brief moment (i.e. dead air) is bad for viewership. It's like trying to translate poetry into another language in real-time as it's read to you, all while preserving the rhyme scheme and without pausing between stanzas. Your brain just isn't that quick. If you think it is, then you're doing it poorly.
This^^^ in an emotionally charged situation, there's a fine line between admitting you're wrong and being forced into doing so. Arguments can only be productive to an extent, they're no place for serious self-reflection
There can be instances where during an argument you can change your mind and it's appropriate to change your mind. I've had instances in my personal life where in the argument the other person made me realize my error. This doesn't happen very often. The vast majority of cases this isn't true for me, but it does happen. For some it may happen more often for others even less than the infrequency it happens for myself. Regardless, in such situations you should concede in humility. And, respectfully, I disagree with the sentiment of your last two sentences. Outside of a medium like TV, you can sit there for a moment and think about it. You don't have to constantly be responding. You can take time to think. And sometimes it doesn't even require that. Your brain can be that quick. A realization sometimes dawns on you suddenly. Something the other person says can trigger an "aha" moment and then the matter is settled. I'd be surprised if this has never happened to you. I've been on the receiving and the giving end of that "aha" moment.
#8 is HUGELY important. That show high emotional maturity and also personal strength, because by giving yourself permission to change your mind, you're admitting that you're not perfect, which is the biggest hurdle for so many people.
Great video. I found this conversation between Andrew and Piers fascinating, not just because of the subjects they talked about, but the psychological battle between the two of them.
Tate is good at it, but he’s also a manipulative sociopath. He actually is misogynistic as hell. The way he avoids agreeing with this is masterfully done. But he’s a manipulator and he’s good at it.
"Give yourself permission to change your mind." is another way of saying "show humility and learn". Definitely didn't expect this to be a point but it's one, if not the most, important point. It's not about being right or wrong but being able to understand someone's POV. I feel like people are so afraid to change their position and mind about a topic because they believe it defines them as a person. It's not the principle of giving up your own beliefs but simply seeing a different perspective and realizing that perhaps you may have not seen the full picture. I respect the person who grows within an argument. It's definitely hard for me to apply this point and actually took me aback when he mentioned it because I find it hard giving myself permission and realizing I may have overlooked some things within an argument.
This video is exactly what I needed to start my day on a positive note. It's a reminder that success comes to those who work hard and never give up. Thank you for this motivation!
I use this Andrew Tate's tactics when discussing with someone whose sole purpose is to portray me as a villain rather than come to a conclusion about the truth
Regardless of what you think about Andrew, it is interesting how well he comports himself in interviews, and there are many tactics he used that others can learn from when engaging in debates of their own.
You don’t have to change your mind, you can apologize for what you said and how it made someone feel uneasy, but there’s also accept people for who they are.
I don't think that's completely accurate. You only apologize for something you said if you made a mistake or talked in the heat of the moment out of anger or something. You don't apologize because others didn't like your words. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. When I find myself in those kinds of conversations I just say "I'm sorry you feel that way" and move on. Not every argument needs to end in an friendly agreement.
@@old_dan fr sometimes people are looking for that 'I'm sorry" as a way to validate themselves even if they're completely wrong about the subject at hand. One thing i always tell people is that apologizing is an easy way out and people will walk over you and have zero respect for the things you care about. Sometimes you have to put your foot down (respectfully) without blowing up. Some people just don't know the meaning of the word disagreement and assume that if you don't agree with me then you're against me and there's no middle ground. Its honestly wild how egotistical some people are nowadays.
tate isnt responsible for YOUR feelings YOU are responsible for YOUR feelings feelings are subjective to each individual individually. why should someone apologize for your feelings ? maybe you should apologize for YOUR feelings and reaction . if your uneasy maybe you should investigate that further and YOU work on YOUR feelings Tate has NO idea HOW YOU will feel towards his comments if your OFFENDED thats on YOU someone else might not be offended its he obviously has a internet following so alot of people arent offended by him maybe you should try to understand what he says more again we all dont have to agree about everything but get a hold of those feelings
Andrew's eloquence skill is that when you ask him a question he gives you an immediate answer that an average person would take around 10mins to come up with an answer that smooth and perfect, and he does it every single time. Andrew Tate is world class when it comes to holding a conversation.
How to end any argument. Say, "are you trying to argue with me or talk to me, because I don't know about you but I just wanna talk to you" This works for me
Big shout out to #8. Much like not learning from past mistakes, so many people refuse to allow themselves to change their minds when presented with new/better information, learning that they're wrong, or as society as a whole continues to evolve.
It's tough, because if you are totally open and honest, you will never be able to settle on anything. New information is presented all the time. I realized it greatly depends on how much you share with others, or through social media. Personally I was typing a lot of my opinions and ideas in my private file, but never shared any of my opinions publicly. Because of that, I am changing my mind on things very frequently. This made me realize that if politicians were honest and open to new ideas, they would be changing their minds all the time, which would make them even less popular, because they would be seen as grifters and whatnot.
@@julius43461 good points. Probably in trust worthy relationships being open and willing to change your mind have benefits but if your a public figure it could be misconstrued by your detractors.
@@ryanvacation7319 Yeah, if they were honestly interested in changing their minds, they would be switching partied all the time, kind of how many ordinary people do.
Disagree. You have to choose the things you will/will not compromise on in life. Granted there are often a lot of things in life you CAN compromise on, but to take this video as an example, the majority of waht Tate is talking about is stuff he passionately believes in with legitimate, objective cause. He does not need to allow himself to change his mind on something important to him. When discussing your favorite flavor of ice cream...that's a different matter.
I am on the don't try to win an argument. Always first seek common ground , let others present their views , let them talk and seek to understand what made them defensive, correct any misperception you found , until you can find that common ground , don't talk listen more Once fully understood others views and their emotions , then engage . That way the person could go from your enemy to a potential ally . Any time you feel no common ground can be reached , pause and leave .continue the conversation another time .
I actually wanted to ask, how do you deal with people who are really sassy and have good comebacks? Or if there is a situation where there is no time but there is still a person insulting you etc, watch a scene with Érica Sinclair and Murray from Stranger Things 3, or maybe someone like Max From Stranger Things aswell, I know this is kinda weird but how do you deal with people like that? I’m just very horrible st defending myself really and I get scared easily 😢😢😢😢it’s because I have nothing to say in the moment and I just get kinda of shocked as well lol
I used your advice here to absolutely steam roll someone who was rude to me. It was the First time I have ever stood up for myself and it was amazing!!!
the art of conversation truly is beautiful. unfortunately, most people when they hear the world "argument" think of one side being the winner and the other side being wholly steamrollered and feeling humiliated. that is not how it has to be. one tip is to go into an argument with the mindset to understand another opinion, with the mindset that its okay to not come out completely winning. its okay to compromise on a view. its okay to be wrong too. people respect people who are willing to admit they are wrong. this way, you are less likely to get mad or stressed.
@@hatersgottahatewejustgotta198 he is like this in podcasts and other interviews too. You just choose to judge based on a few seconds clips or media articles.
At the very least, I now grasp the concept of leverage. Creating wealth and financial freedom isn't as tough as many people believe. Building wealth and remaining financially stable indefinitely is a lot easier with the appropriate information. Participating in financial programs and products is the only true approach to make a high income and remain affluent indefinitely.
Most people simply enter the foreign exchange market without comprehending matters like this. The first stage in building money is determining your goals and risk tolerance, which you may do on your own or with the assistance of a financial counselor who works with a verified Finance agency. And also you can learn the facts about saving and investing and create a clear plan, you should be able to acquire financial security over time and enjov the benefits of income management.
You are correct! Working with a financial advisor who has worked in a solid financial firm for a long time, such as John will actually set you up for success in life. I'm delighted I was able to reach out to "John Desmond Heppolette" earlier this year because while others were grumbling about the downturn in the markets due to the state of the economy, I was busy learning from him and eventually made over seven figures in the first quarter alone, which is why it's always good to join the correct community.
I've been making more than six figures passively investing with John Desmond Heppolette, who showed me the right community to join and grow mv finances and I don't have to do much work. It doesn't matter if the market is crashing, I will always make returns.
It's more like a 'how to be delusional' thing. Exactly the opposite of a 'reality check' that's why all his boyfriends are so delusional. Maybe you too and the thing about delusions is that u think it's real. U prolly stay too much on the internet watching Andrew so pls just go out and see the real world. Pls.
@@steveanton763 Similar to the ideas of other popular influencers of young men (JBP, Tate, Alex Hormozi, Gary Vee: Life is suffering. Taking on responsibility is the route to a meaningful life. You should strive for real achievements and to become a protector and provider. Not all masculinity is toxic. It's okay to want money. Go to the gym, get in shape, and you'll feel and perform better in every way. Don't waste your life because it's the only one you've got. No one cares if your life is a success more than you. Women are born with value (Youth, beauty, fertility etc..) men have to make their value, through competence. Focus on getting yourself in a good position, and the women, cars, peace and enlightenment will come. Hard work actually works, use the internet for it's infinite leverage to make money fast. I don't know, that's scratching the surface I guess, if you want to hear the best of his advice then there are some clips here on youtube, but tatespeech on rumble is where he posts content now. I do not agree with everything that Andrew says, and certainly wouldn't phrase most things in the same way, but I do agree with OP that he's a reality check in a lot of ways for people who are disconnected with how difficult it really is to be a success and to act as an individual.
Wow. The way Tate evaded many close ended tricky questions and proved his point is simply amazing. He is not one of those guys who simoly make a point without anything to back it up.
This video is so great. An objective, sober analysis of a conversation between two highly controversial persons where siding even a little bit with any one of them could get you ostracized. You managed to find something good in their behavior and their speech without codoning what each one of them stand for. Big respect for that! It takes skill to create informative content based on two people that many people don't want to touch with a then foot pole. And the the level of detail is amazing. It's better than some expensive psychology courses.
1) Spot when they enter fight mode. Subtle: Label YOU as an issue. Misquoting you. Showing vS having respect is a big difference. Simple solution: reestablish your own point view before defending it. Argue with you Before letting you explain. 2) Derailing interruptions before you can make a good point. Pause, acknowledge the person (“Understood, Pierce; I respect you have the right to think that.”) continue arguing. 3) Preempt their interruption. If they still interrupt, one finger stop gesture. 4) Don’t steamroll concessions. Flip side: don’t be the interrupter and prevents you from reaching common ground. You can’t make good points when ppl. Interrupt. Physically relax into the argument by taking deep belly breaths. 5) Catch any logic gaps. Remember the premise of their argument. 6) Draw a conversational boundary DIRECTLY. 7) Acknowledge any common ground. Example: I completely agree. Genuine tone and voice. Then state what exactly you disagree with. 8) Give yourself permission to change your mind. It’s not a sign of weakness. You do NOT need to change your preexisting self to fit your beliefs . Takes confidence to change belief in front of others.
"Gotcha" questions are also common among socially combative people. I dealt with this recently with a high ticket salesman. Everything was fine and friendly until I declined his offer. He then got defensive and made attempts to guilt trip me. Don't play into their game.
Piers is always do that “interrupting” people during interviews. Well handled Andrew. I like the finger method for stopping being interrupted. I am definitely going to try this.
I had the same hunch to just let them speak and return to my argument later, but unfortunately it doesn't always work - when you have limited time, and especially so if you also, at the same time, are arguing against status quo on that limited time. All that the other side has to do is to keep interrupting you
Not hard, it's Piers Morgan. Andrew Tate is a manipulative jackass that built his empire on virgins idolozing him because a woman dumped them, Piers is just a straight up clown.
Even tho I hate Andrew and I know what he says is a complete nonsense 99% of the time I really respect how he handled the situation here and how calm he was.
Always stay open minded by changing your mind if you think you were wrong about something. don't be too extreme, a middle ground is always the right place to be. If you have doubts about certain ideas, don't argue just to win the debate but exchange thoughts so you might find a better one to embrace. And when you discuss an idea that you strongly believe in, don't force others to embrace it but focus on learning more about what you already believe in, maybe there's something you missed. Also stay open minded, after all there's a possibility that you have embraced a wrong belief blindly, there's always a chance that you are wrong.
Why is no one concerned that tate literally said "I think my sister is her husbands property"? He's being cast in such a good light in this video despite his glaring moral issues. Surely another speaker could have been endorsed to demonstrate defending yourself in conversations. I didn't expect this from this channel.
I've heard nothing but bad things about Andrew Tate, but his attitude and social behavior here is genuinely praise worthy and something to learn. I've always been aggressive and hyper, so speaking slowly and taking breaks is a must for me during debates.
Andrew didn't say it was bad to change your mind he said he is responsible for the things he has said. I think we all know that Andrew is fully capable of changing his mind seeing as he literally changed his whole religion. If somebody really thought changing their mind was bad they sure as Hell would not change their whole religion.
You need to adapt, for that you need change your perspectives. You don´t get where Tate is if you can`t change yourself and he aknowledges his saying with responsibility. You don`t talk lightly when you are aware of responsibility and weight of words.
He did not "change" his religion. He said Islam is the only true religion left on this earth because all other religions already started to water down their rules to fit with the modern woke ideals. So it's the religion that "changes their minds", not him. So he needs to convert to Islam which fits more with what he believes.
@@migvel1711 since when Andrew converted from atheist? He was a Christian. Christianity and Islam are both Abrahamic religion. So it's normal for a Christian to convert to Islam.
Piers Morgan is like debate practice for rich people. He smirks and grins as he uses these tricks, knowing full and well what he's doing. Notice he loses the smirk when Andrew parries it with his own debate training.
@@CrabCrabCrabskateCrab are you kidding me ? He is trying to force stuff he misunderstood and saying that he said it when he didnt if you dont pay attention to those garbage people , theyre gonna eat you alive
Your channel is GOLD! I couldn't sit through the entire debate with AT and PM, but I did leave a comment mentioning how great your channel is and how it will help us with people like PM. And here we are a direct video about it! Thank you my dude! You're a legend and I've told at least 12 people in the real world about your channel 🙂♥️
1. look them in eyes and look way they move their body 2. take deep slow breath 3. stay focused 4. look it from 3rd person (meaning it doesn't have to do with you it's their perspective, don't get it personal. If you get it personal they win) 5. W8 them to finish and ask them is that all, may I answer now. In same time you are saying to them that there is nothing special in what they said but still you "show respect" by asking may you answer now but actually you are luring their "YES" towards you giving yourself advantage over them and lowering their guard in same time. 6. Speak slow and low voice use hands up and down and nod your head so that they reflect that and start nod and follow hand gesture up and down (agreement movement) commanding it from them without saying it.
Hahahaha Tate. Like him or not, the man is an excellent communicator. His philosophy of approaching life like chess and staying 2 steps ahead at all times is intriguing. Also, Piers Morgan got outsmarted by some girl from Love Island, he never stood a chance against Tate 😂
When making a statement 1.) Preface by identifying what it is that you will speak about. 2.) Say what you have to say 3.) Close with "and that is what I have to say on that matter". That makes for better communication.
Well done looking objective on both parts, so we can learn both sides and the tools of charisma/ retosim. Enjoy how you calmly show each example right on the go.
I think the best response to being called out for things you said and did in the past is to own them and then simply DENY the other person an apology. For example: "Do I agree with those things I said in the past? No. Today I realize those things were indeed problematic for many reasons. Do I regret saying those things? Absolutely not! Had I not said those things then I would never have had to face the immediate backlash and live through the push-back on my point of view. Without that push-back and backlash I would not have had the opportunity to learn and grow from it. So no! I do not regret saying those things nor do I apologize for it."
You GUYS!! this was the video I’ve been waiting for you to do! Thanks for covering argument tips! I’m not good at this, so fr sure I can’t wait to put these tips to practice thank you thank you!
I agree that openness to changing your mind is a powerful, positive thing. However, I don't think Andrew was wrong for holding strong to his position here. He can stand on his opinion, and that's ok too.
I think in this scenario you're right, Andrew wasn't meant to change his stance on anything with this mockery of an interview with Piers, he's the last person you'd want to have on the frontlines for thst one
Piers derives great pleasure and satisfaction from getting the people he interviews to say "I'm sorry". The motivation is beyond a journalistic motivation I think, he enjoys breaking them emotionally.
tate just held his ground well and piers uses a lot of annoying tactics. not sure what else you want to do about it, maybe he's a bad man or maybe not but that's just how this interview went.
Tate deserves praise, anyone that wins over Morgan by the end of one of his interviews deserves some level of respect l, and if you watch the second interview Morgan does with rate, Morgan comes in with a completely different attitude and a higher level of respect for tate
Arguing with my ex partner was dreadful - He has a perfide strategy of victimizing himself of being interrupted. Whenever you were in respond mode, he started talking over your response - When i however continued my response he took the offense of "being interrupted" twisting the fact for his side - Beware of such people .
It has been a minute since I watched some Charisma University videos. I used to binge them a lot as I enjoy very much the subjects and tips. Congratulations on 5M followers!
Actually funnily enough, I have gotten into pretty heated arguments with my mother because she is a pretty stubborn and hot headed person like I am, but in recent years, I’ve learned to do most of the things in this video just naturally because I realized that having shouting contests over the phone resolves nothing (and severely wastes my time as well). I don’t do it consistently enough to avoid shouting battles altogether, but I often catch myself starting to boil and immediately release the tension in my body and start talking slower as well, which in turn forces her to talk more calmly as well because now she is the only one upset. I don’t even know where I learned it but I think it’s just that the idea of “communication is key” was just in my head that I started looking for ways to stop getting into those tiring arguments and these were the conclusions I came up with as well. But one thing I need to do is stop “steamrolling concessions”. I have a bad habit of going overboard and taking it too far once I feel that I’m on a roll and that I can potentially get my point across and change someone’s mind, that I start throwing my cards out with little to no restraint because I assume that that’s the window that I can “do all the damage” essentially. In reality, they may or may not be processing what you said and may potentially be annoyed that you aren’t even letting them speak despite holding out and temporarily conceding to you so that the conversation can progress.
I’ve been through debating with guys like piers and if you are in the right, it is really easy to win over the conversation . The easiest way is to be around people and let them agree with what you say, it will end up making the bully in the conversation gives up. In a firm and well mannered way of course .
Last part of this was awesome. The point/lesson of allowing yourself to change your opinions from past without worrying so much ... allowing you to grow... yeah. Good stuff.
About 4 months ago a lady crashed into me. There's no sugar coating it, it was completely and totally her fault. I got out my car and approached her to see if she was hurt. She walked out, vape in hand, shouting "what the f***" and immediately blaming me for HER crash. I politely told her that she crashed into me and I had nothing to do with it. As a young driver I called my mother who arrive a few minutes later and as I tried explaining the details of the crash, the lady consistently interrupted me saying I had crashed into her. I politely asked her to stop interrupting to which she said "I'm not going to stop interrupting you" and started explaining how she thought I had driven straight into her. So I raised my finger and said "No that's not what happened" to which she screamed "Don't shove your finger in my face" So despite following a number of these steps I've come to realise the key detail is not to sympathise with an attacker. It is important that yes, you do not come across as aggressive or rude, but know that being defensive to them is exactly what they want. Its better to simply consider yourself above the person you are talking to and make them aware (without directly saying so) that they are only a minor inconvenience to you, that their attacks really mean nothing. Maybe give a little snigger after they twist your words, or laugh a little when they say something ridiculous to attack you. Because at the end of the day the outcome is usually the same, few people win an argument against the opponent, instead., you want to win the crowd
Looks to me more like he just has very strong beliefs and can't reconcile those beliefs with other people having different but valid points of view. The guy's not perfect but he did at least treat Andrew as a person and tried to connect with him. Most people in that political wing don't even try to do that. Unfortunate thing about today is that so many on both sides can't even contemplate the idea of the other side being right, and it hurts them both.
![Coheed and Cambria - Searching for Tomorrow [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hDsYGLbmadg/mqdefault.jpg)
Imagine a 10 year old watching this to win an argument with their siblings
Disclaimer: I was ten when I posted this and I’m not deleting it because it was relatable at the time pls don’t judge lol
Lol wouldn't work since the winning argument would just get ignored 🤣
I'm 14, doing just that.
I’m 16 yes I’m doing that😂
what color is your BUGATTI?
Works everytime
…oddly specific
Staying calm and not letting your emotions overtake you in an argument is a huge advantage to keeping a clear head and responding efficiently. Easier said than done but extremely important.
Understanding the motive is very crucial Sarah
agreed. and it is hard to do
It's also a good way to piss the other person off because they think you don't care enough about the argument to get upset over it
@@richardvanheesen1606 i think its hard to do because people are constantly pushing and prodding at you for an emotional response.
Yeah that's why I cannot argue with my older sister at all because she always gets super emotional.
“Understood Piers” exactly! I was having an argument with a coworker in which he repeatedly made contradictory statements in order to win. The best way to conclude is to just be content in your own view and accept that this person is not going to change for you. Showing respect, regardless of whether you respect the person!
Why wouldn't you just lay out the contradictions if you're using the energy to say anything lol
@@jcbbbyou think that because your trying to “win” the conversation/debate the best thing to do is let them sink deeper into there contradictions and delusion the more polite, respectful and clear cut you are with your statements makes them seem like a barking dog whilst you seem like the patient owner waiting for the dog to tire itself out
It's interesting how Piers does that for a living but Andrew handled him profoundly.
Right? He’s impressively articulate and well-thought out for being a kickboxer lol
@@tysoflowin cuz he’s not just a kick boxer
He is a business man who has studied the realities and nature of the world. He is truly a .001% man
That's why he the Top G
I disagree. Tate went around in god damn circles and wouldn't acknowledge the dangers of his beliefs and his popularity
@@whatdisd because that's what he was asked??
When I was a child my father would yell at me when I did something wrong. He was a good dad, but this caused me to develop a problem where I shut down when someone starts yelling at me. This channel has helped me get over that struggle and remain calm and not back down. I sincerely appreciate your videos.
Respect
I can't stand when people yell and get angry. I don't know why, I just shrink into myself and feel scared.
@@LauraR0ckzLolz some people are mean, some grew up with parents who did that, and it rubbed off, and some just have a hard time not yelling, thats just one of there struggles
@@LauraR0ckzLolz That’s exactly what I would do. I remember getting falsely accused of something by my 4th grade teacher and I chose to admit to it instead of sticking up for myself just so it would be over with sooner. Maybe that’s not the same way you feel, but you aren’t alone. I support you. And I wish the best for you on your journey.
I grew up in a similar family as well but with a highly narcissistic dad that would just make up whatever Bizzaro world story to fit his narrative headed to just dropping the hammer on me for nothing real.
As an adult, I have put a massive amount of time and effort into learning to both communicate and debate. Now my family avoids having any form of heated discussions with me because I can shut down their nonsense in and then railroad them into looking like fools in seconds and never look like the bad guy for any of it.
Knowing how well to articulate one self and get over hard times is key to getting your head above waters. Most times in order to stay in check one would have to consistently keep improving and looking out for new ways and opportunities. Some of us have battles we are fighting inside but regardless we should stay strong and steadfast and keep your head up
Sir Zach has really been helpful with my career and general life, I bless the day I met him
A lot is usually spoken of Mr Zachery Micah Demers
Who is Zach?
I have had the pleasure of working with Zach M Demers for several years and have been consistently impressed with his ability to deliver results. He is a skilled investment advisor who is dedicated to his clients' success
I have had the pleasure of working with Zach M Demers for several years and have been consistently impressed with his ability to deliver results. He is a skilled investment advisor who is dedicated to his clients' success
Summary:
1-spot when they enter “fight mode”
2-watch a misquoting
3-beware of derailing interruptions
4-don’t steamroll concessions
5-catch any logic gaps
6-draw a conversational boundary
7-acknowledge and common ground
8-give yourself permission to change your mind
9 - Jet in jail for human trafficking
@@f1atl1n3 yet you are spreading hate from your mothers basement
@@f1atl1n3 which you haven't done.
Wish this worked with woman....nr5-catch any logical gaps, wont help you because they then derail the conversation and act like their a victim and say you are attacking them....the worst part for men is that we want to get to a logical answer/conclusion/end as quick as possible. We speak factual,not emotionally. So this is good advice when speaking to most men, but not with women.
@@f1atl1n3 10 - get a life
Piers Morgan just made Tate look so much better than what he was trying to do lmao
not to mention the name of the show is “uncensored” but piers is arguing for self censorship
@@TurdFergusen it's Piers Morgan Uncensored not everyone else uncensored.
@@TurdFergusen how is he doing that? He interrupts and he goes OTT with analysis of people's words. But that's not asking for someone to sensor themselves.
I never knew who he was until this interview. I think it's a bit strange that someone at 36 years old finds 18 year old girls more appealing than women in their mid 20s. Not sure when he said it. But that's girls just outta school. Even if he said it within the past 10 years, it's a bit young for him
@@eddiebear34 thats your hangup, not biology’s.
@@TurdFergusen beast alert
I recommend everyone to find the book titled Tate Mindset; it goes deep into all of this, and it changed my life
i try to find that ebook last week and finally. find it on your channel. thanks dude
Yo talk about bot accounts making the same exact comments at the same time across multiple videos,
If you’re still searching for the book go find Jesus instead
I'll buy it when Andrew Tate himself says so
this is why your channel is great, instead of like a lot of other people dogpile on this debacle. you made a teachable moment out of it
when you say it like that they sound like the annoying parent that tries to make a learning opportunity out of everything
@@justinthawsetmyo4173 first time watching this channel? 🤨
@@tonyeltigre4745 no I just never thought of it that way
@@justinthawsetmyo4173 what way?
I swear down. I rate him highly 👏🏿
Piers looked just unprofessional, Andrew did an amazing job remaining calm and assertive
The only thing that makes Piers look professional or respectable is his suit.
@@snakedogman yes, right 😅!
I would not have been able to keep my cool with such a boobjob. elvis christ that Piers is a donkeybone.
@@snakedogman nah he's anti LGBT representation so he's the goat for me
While looking agitated/pissed and acting genuinely annoyed.
I hate arguments. One of my close friends at the time came to my house and lashed out at me for saying I was disappointed she flaked on me. She came at me HARD saying I was selfish and a bad friend because her mom is an addict and I should know how much she’s struggling with that. The whole argument she kept throwing that at me and when I’d try to defend myself she’d come down harder because in her eyes I was a sociopath for even trying to defend myself. Her moms been an addict for 10 years and her brothers have cut her off. She chooses to remain in contact and be affected by her mom.
Ultimately the way she came at me that day isn’t something I think I should ever experience with a friend, that level of emotional attack… hell no. She kept saying “I don’t think I can be friends with someone like you” and I was like that’s fine by me I definitely don’t want to be friends with you
i feel you.
Solid breakdown. The reason Andrew didn't change his mind was because he still believes in the sentiment of the things he said. He just knows going forward, to have an impact with his words, he has to phrase them in a less emotionally triggering way because of his popularity. Piers couldn't get that and wanted him to recant. Not changing your mind, for Andrew benefits his brand.
there's a difference between changing one's own mind, and getting the Spanish Inquisition treatment.
that there was Spanish Inquisition (struggle session). everyone is obligated to stand their ground in the face of such an offense.
This is the most thoughtful comment I've seen so far in this comment section that resumes exactly what Andrew was trying to transmit with his interventions. You have my like sir.
@@crackwitz Rightly said. Give no ground in these environments. Jordan Peterson didn't, either. If you apologize even once, you're done. They always have killed the people that apologized.
It's very difficult to entertain the notion of another angle or difference of opinion when you're being interviewed by someone who's hostile and adversarial. Piers makes people want to be guarded as to them avoiding being baited into a "Gotcha" moment.
Agreed 100%. It would be different if Piers actually provided countering truthful reasons why Tate should recant his position but even IF he did, this would NOT be the time or place to recant because a big part of Tate’s brand is mental and testicular fortitude to withstand the onslaught of unpopularity.
Like it or not, recanting, even if merited by Tate’s own principles, would be perceived as a loss of character on Tate’s part by his fans.
I'm not the kind of guy who loves Tate, but man Piers was completely awful in that interview
Thats pretty normal for piers
Agreed!
You don't need to like Tate that's OK
That's how Piers operates. He's a bully. He's not there to talk; he's there to fight.
Piers is always awful 🤮
1. Ver cuando entran a modo pelea (desde el inicio te etiquetan como un problema / pelean contigo antes de que puedas explicar tu punto de vista)
2. Ser consciente de cuando comienzan a manipular tus palabras y no permitirlo, aclarar a lo que te refieres.
3. Cuando comienza a interrumpir, hacer una pausa, decir que entiendo a la otra persona y pedirle por favor que no me interrumpa.
4. Mantenerse calmado y no interrumpir
5. Estar atentos a las fallas en su argumentación
6. Poner límites en la conversación (ser directo y no hablar de lo que no quiero hablar)
7. Primero establecer los puntos en común y luego discrepar
8. Ser abierto de mente (no ver el cambiar de opinión como una debilidad)
ty
IMO, the best way to win any argument is not even to win, but to get the person you are talking to understand what you are saying. The moment you become aggressive, or passive is when you have either escalated or removed yourself from the conversation, just stay neutral. It's ok to have an opinion on something and express emotion just don't force it upon the receiver. As someone who has been in many arguments, it never goes well when you both leave thinking nothing got settled or your point never got across.
dont force it on the receiver, just present it to him. and make sure its a good one. if not, fix the facts or logic to make it a better one
@@strannick2212 some people are just too ego driven and blind
i guess that's true but it's annoying if you're actually right. i don't mean right in a arrogant way, but when you're actually right or at least 99% right yet the person yelling at you is either incapable of understanding or deliberately chooses to not understand. i think those are just free loss situations.
@@strannick2212 often the facts and logic simply aren't relevant. someone may be married to a poor position, or refuse to change their position because it would make them look bad, or because they don't like you, or think you should be subservient to them regardless of their error.
well said
I don’t agree with Tate on a lot of his takes, but you can’t deny he composes himself very well. He is very intelligent when it comes to social interactions. Look at his conversations with Xqc for example.
Tate is right about everything
@@sgtcrusher66 Hmmm, his courses are a complete scam. He knows how to be right about everything to earn money. That's why he became muslim, for muslims to buy his courses and for him to earn even more AND for him to keep his social position, basically to keep being famous. That's why he became muslim to become more famous and not lose his fame. Open your eyes.
Let’s see where his smarts will take him.
Tate is right about 70-80% of things
@EvaMira in your opinion which is fine I respect that but what is he wrong on out of curiosity ?
Tate is one of the best communicators I have ever seen. Def a good study. Thanks
lol
Hitler also had charisma.
Funny joke
@@WSGVallove him or hate him, you can’t deny is is world class communicator. How else did you think he got so famous so quickly and reached the level of status and fame? I don’t agree with everything about Tate but I can give him his props. If your hatred blinds you so much to not acknowledge the skill, then it’s you that’s blind
@@the-ironclad funny sarcasm
The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, is also a great example of how and how not to conduct yourself in an argument/debate. While certain characters had their views clouded by bias, the single biggest takeaway I believe that came from this film is that you have to be willing to admit or at least realise that your views could be wrong on a given issue. I believe that when you enter an argument firstly you should go in with the mindset to listen and to understand and know that you could be wrong and secondly to figure out whether the person you are conversing with is of a similar mindset and is also willing to concede a view when proven wrong.
My favourite film
Actually very intellectual stuff
I came to notice a pattern here, that you'd most probably need these 90% of the time if you're ever getting interviewed by a western media, or anyone "trained" by their style/system of thoughts. For the most part I've seen interviews in other countries in other languages, people are actually discussing and understanding things rather than trying to demolish or cancel that person. It's slowly becoming apparent to me that these "interviewers" has someone pulling the strings, putting a leashed dog on these prime channels trying to cancel that person they interviewing. It's not about seeking the truth, modern media pushed by the western nations no longer about seeking the truth.
A media that can convince people that a nation has WMD, who can convince people to justify their government to interfere with someone's country and caused millions of death, and so many other disgusting things for the past decades - how can I expect anything different as an output in return? That's the very definition of insanity.
Can confirm.
News debates in Asian countries are often way more heated and unprofessional but they're not playing a game to goad you into a corner where you have to apologize or get cancelled
It's just two people arguing very loudly lol but I'd take that over these duplicitous mind games
Very well said and profoundly thought.
Thank you 🙏!
absolutely - wish more ppl realized this
thats what happened to kanye after interview with peirs
He who controls the media controls the narrative
I'm about to become John Wick in the group chat after this video.
Facts
Also, watch out for "half-concessions".
They'll start the sentence by agreeing with you and want you to agree with their point, and after you agree to it, they'll tie you into something else (usually putting you in a bad light) in the second sentence, strawmanning you.
DON'T go back on what you agreed with, just expound on your opinion to more accurately describes your stance, while maintaining you still agree with the first point. Same with yes or no questions, feel free to answer than, just be ready to explain your opinion if they try to loop you into something. Always confirm that you agree with their first point, but *your* version of their second point, not theirs.
never give them their frame
Piers is just like that annoying lady who interviewed Jordan Peterson. "So what you're saying is " lol 😆
Peirs more likely doesn't put it in a question form. He does more of "This is what you ARE saying"
Cathy Newman. JP dismantled her piece by piece.
LMAO 🤣🤣
JP is a master at seeing through BS lmao
It does seem to be a characteristic of British media that the interviewer heavily leads the conversation and doesn't allow for much deviation from whatever question is being asked. This has both pros and cons of course.
Jeremy Paxman is one of the best examples of this, he'll let someone talk at length if they're sticking to his question but he will interrupt the second they stop doing so or they say something he can pick up on. It's really refreshing as an American when it comes to interviewing politicans especially, as they will often try and answer a different question that suits them. British journalists are much less likely to let that fly than here in the US where the interviewer just let's them do what they want.
However, when it comes to a person defending themselves from accusations or criticism, the British style certainly leads to more frustration and confrontation as the interviewer is much more able to push an agenda that may have been decided beforehand.
Then you add Piers Morgan into that dynamic and you've got a 'spicy' interview haha
I am downloading this to be better at argument. Since I am really bad at expressing myself, because i was always interrupted since i was young when i wanna make my point.
You C on C guys are amazing! This was an extremely informative upload using two controversial characters to illustrate the topic perfectly. Very well balanced. I've watched loads of your vids... first time I've commented.
they had an amazing podcast that were going much more in deep on popular events
I'm not sure I agree with the last point. I don't disagree with the words "Give yourself permission to change your mind", but I think it's almost always both ethically and intellectually wrong to change your mind *during* an argument unless it is *very* clear that you were wrong. Changing your mind is like grooming yourself -- it should usually be done in private.
Why? Because you don't actually have *time* during an argument to think it all the way through, especially in a medium (TV) where pausing to think about something for more than a brief moment (i.e. dead air) is bad for viewership. It's like trying to translate poetry into another language in real-time as it's read to you, all while preserving the rhyme scheme and without pausing between stanzas. Your brain just isn't that quick. If you think it is, then you're doing it poorly.
This^^^ in an emotionally charged situation, there's a fine line between admitting you're wrong and being forced into doing so. Arguments can only be productive to an extent, they're no place for serious self-reflection
Good points
There can be instances where during an argument you can change your mind and it's appropriate to change your mind. I've had instances in my personal life where in the argument the other person made me realize my error. This doesn't happen very often. The vast majority of cases this isn't true for me, but it does happen. For some it may happen more often for others even less than the infrequency it happens for myself. Regardless, in such situations you should concede in humility.
And, respectfully, I disagree with the sentiment of your last two sentences. Outside of a medium like TV, you can sit there for a moment and think about it. You don't have to constantly be responding. You can take time to think. And sometimes it doesn't even require that. Your brain can be that quick. A realization sometimes dawns on you suddenly. Something the other person says can trigger an "aha" moment and then the matter is settled. I'd be surprised if this has never happened to you. I've been on the receiving and the giving end of that "aha" moment.
System 1 and system 2
Especially if you were constantly interrupted
#8 is HUGELY important. That show high emotional maturity and also personal strength, because by giving yourself permission to change your mind, you're admitting that you're not perfect, which is the biggest hurdle for so many people.
Great video. I found this conversation between Andrew and Piers fascinating, not just because of the subjects they talked about, but the psychological battle between the two of them.
Tate is good at it, but he’s also a manipulative sociopath. He actually is misogynistic as hell. The way he avoids agreeing with this is masterfully done. But he’s a manipulator and he’s good at it.
@@DaZeDmerlin not he is not he does not hate women
It's a literal "Battle of the Bastards"
@@DaZeDmerlin ok sheep
@@DaZeDmerlin define misogynistic?
"Give yourself permission to change your mind." is another way of saying "show humility and learn". Definitely didn't expect this to be a point but it's one, if not the most, important point. It's not about being right or wrong but being able to understand someone's POV.
I feel like people are so afraid to change their position and mind about a topic because they believe it defines them as a person. It's not the principle of giving up your own beliefs but simply seeing a different perspective and realizing that perhaps you may have not seen the full picture. I respect the person who grows within an argument. It's definitely hard for me to apply this point and actually took me aback when he mentioned it because I find it hard giving myself permission and realizing I may have overlooked some things within an argument.
This video is exactly what I needed to start my day on a positive note. It's a reminder that success comes to those who work hard and never give up. Thank you for this motivation!
I use this Andrew Tate's tactics when discussing with someone whose sole purpose is to portray me as a villain rather than come to a conclusion about the truth
Same
"My Unmatched Perspicacity coupled with sheer indefatigability makes me a feared opponent in any realm of human endeavour " ~ Emory Andrew Tate II
I had to google those words. Once understood it’s very powerful
Me: /whoosh
Tate is amazing.
W
A month late, but to clarify; that was his father's words.
Just keep on smiling, on arguments this will make them feel losing it . Works every time for me.
Regardless of what you think about Andrew, it is interesting how well he comports himself in interviews, and there are many tactics he used that others can learn from when engaging in debates of their own.
they're both toxic and pathetic
He is not good when he got caught lying. He suddenly have big outburst and started to randomly insult everybody for no reason.
@@nntflow7058 Show me an example
We could say the same about hitler. There are enough people in this world to put as an example someone with questionable behaviors/ideologies.
@@danielaorellana8216no matter what you think about Tate it’s unfair to link him to hitler because hitler is a lot worse
You don’t have to change your mind, you can apologize for what you said and how it made someone feel uneasy, but there’s also accept people for who they are.
I don't think that's completely accurate. You only apologize for something you said if you made a mistake or talked in the heat of the moment out of anger or something. You don't apologize because others didn't like your words. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. When I find myself in those kinds of conversations I just say "I'm sorry you feel that way" and move on. Not every argument needs to end in an friendly agreement.
@@old_dan fr sometimes people are looking for that 'I'm sorry" as a way to validate themselves even if they're completely wrong about the subject at hand. One thing i always tell people is that apologizing is an easy way out and people will walk over you and have zero respect for the things you care about. Sometimes you have to put your foot down (respectfully) without blowing up. Some people just don't know the meaning of the word disagreement and assume that if you don't agree with me then you're against me and there's no middle ground. Its honestly wild how egotistical some people are nowadays.
I can disagree about apologizing, because sounds to me you just want aproval to you are always right and somebody was wrong by disagreeing with you.
tate isnt responsible for YOUR feelings YOU are responsible for YOUR feelings feelings are subjective to each individual individually. why should someone apologize for your feelings ? maybe you should apologize for YOUR feelings and reaction . if your uneasy maybe you should investigate that further and YOU work on YOUR feelings Tate has NO idea HOW YOU will feel towards his comments if your OFFENDED thats on YOU someone else might not be offended its he obviously has a internet following so alot of people arent offended by him maybe you should try to understand what he says more again we all dont have to agree about everything but get a hold of those feelings
Andrew's eloquence skill is that when you ask him a question he gives you an immediate answer that an average person would take around 10mins to come up with an answer that smooth and perfect, and he does it every single time. Andrew Tate is world class when it comes to holding a conversation.
Lol, world class. Read a book. He trafficks women
zip up ur pants when ur done
@@HeadlessStatue He walks around with knee-pads I'm sure.
How to end any argument. Say, "are you trying to argue with me or talk to me, because I don't know about you but I just wanna talk to you" This works for me
Big shout out to #8. Much like not learning from past mistakes, so many people refuse to allow themselves to change their minds when presented with new/better information, learning that they're wrong, or as society as a whole continues to evolve.
It's tough, because if you are totally open and honest, you will never be able to settle on anything. New information is presented all the time. I realized it greatly depends on how much you share with others, or through social media. Personally I was typing a lot of my opinions and ideas in my private file, but never shared any of my opinions publicly. Because of that, I am changing my mind on things very frequently. This made me realize that if politicians were honest and open to new ideas, they would be changing their minds all the time, which would make them even less popular, because they would be seen as grifters and whatnot.
@@julius43461 well said
@@julius43461 good points. Probably in trust worthy relationships being open and willing to change your mind have benefits but if your a public figure it could be misconstrued by your detractors.
@@ryanvacation7319 Yeah, if they were honestly interested in changing their minds, they would be switching partied all the time, kind of how many ordinary people do.
Disagree. You have to choose the things you will/will not compromise on in life. Granted there are often a lot of things in life you CAN compromise on, but to take this video as an example, the majority of waht Tate is talking about is stuff he passionately believes in with legitimate, objective cause. He does not need to allow himself to change his mind on something important to him. When discussing your favorite flavor of ice cream...that's a different matter.
I am on the don't try to win an argument. Always first seek common ground , let others present their views , let them talk and seek to understand what made them defensive, correct any misperception you found , until you can find that common ground , don't talk listen more
Once fully understood others views and their emotions , then engage . That way the person could go from your enemy to a potential ally .
Any time you feel no common ground can be reached , pause and leave .continue the conversation another time .
I actually wanted to ask, how do you deal with people who are really sassy and have good comebacks? Or if there is a situation where there is no time but there is still a person insulting you etc, watch a scene with Érica Sinclair and Murray from Stranger Things 3, or maybe someone like Max From Stranger Things aswell, I know this is kinda weird but how do you deal with people like that? I’m just very horrible st defending myself really and I get scared easily 😢😢😢😢it’s because I have nothing to say in the moment and I just get kinda of shocked as well lol
I used your advice here to absolutely steam roll someone who was rude to me. It was the First time I have ever stood up for myself and it was amazing!!!
Here's a better tip: Stop trying to win arguments, try getting something out of them, or just leave them if they are wasted time.
Thankyou, I needed that reminder
Nice
Agreed.
thats not how world work atleast on television level
@@shivamsingh-cs2ub That's why most people don't do them. The main goal of television is to get attention, ratings, etc not a productive conversation.
the art of conversation truly is beautiful. unfortunately, most people when they hear the world "argument" think of one side being the winner and the other side being wholly steamrollered and feeling humiliated. that is not how it has to be.
one tip is to go into an argument with the mindset to understand another opinion, with the mindset that its okay to not come out completely winning. its okay to compromise on a view. its okay to be wrong too. people respect people who are willing to admit they are wrong. this way, you are less likely to get mad or stressed.
This interview was a big W for Andrew
And a huge L for Piers
Prolly one of the few W's that he's taken so far 💀
@@hatersgottahatewejustgotta198
ً
@@hatersgottahatewejustgotta198 he is like this in podcasts and other interviews too. You just choose to judge based on a few seconds clips or media articles.
This is such a well put together video. You derserve a sub and a like. Very valid points with no bias.
Sign the petition
At the very least, I now grasp the concept of leverage.
Creating wealth and financial freedom isn't as tough as many people believe. Building wealth and remaining financially stable indefinitely is a lot easier with the appropriate information. Participating in financial programs and products is the only true approach to make a high income and remain affluent indefinitely.
Most people simply enter the foreign exchange market without comprehending matters like this.
The first stage in building money is determining your goals and risk tolerance, which you may do on your own or with the assistance of a financial counselor who works with a verified Finance agency. And also you can learn the facts about saving and investing and create a clear plan, you should be able to acquire financial security over time and enjov the benefits of income management.
You are correct! Working with a financial advisor who has worked in a solid financial firm for a long time, such as John will actually set you up for success in life. I'm delighted I was able to reach out to "John Desmond Heppolette" earlier this year because while others were grumbling about the downturn in the markets due to the state of the economy, I was busy learning from him and eventually made over seven figures in the first quarter alone, which is why it's always good to join the correct community.
I've been making more than six figures passively investing with John Desmond Heppolette, who showed me the right community to join and grow mv finances and I don't have to do much work. It doesn't matter if the market is crashing, I will always make returns.
Andrew Tate is a reality check that everyone needs.
It's more like a 'how to be delusional' thing. Exactly the opposite of a 'reality check' that's why all his boyfriends are so delusional. Maybe you too and the thing about delusions is that u think it's real. U prolly stay too much on the internet watching Andrew so pls just go out and see the real world. Pls.
What's the message he has that everyone needs to hear?
@@steveanton763 Similar to the ideas of other popular influencers of young men (JBP, Tate, Alex Hormozi, Gary Vee:
Life is suffering.
Taking on responsibility is the route to a meaningful life.
You should strive for real achievements and to become a protector and provider.
Not all masculinity is toxic.
It's okay to want money.
Go to the gym, get in shape, and you'll feel and perform better in every way.
Don't waste your life because it's the only one you've got.
No one cares if your life is a success more than you.
Women are born with value (Youth, beauty, fertility etc..) men have to make their value, through competence.
Focus on getting yourself in a good position, and the women, cars, peace and enlightenment will come.
Hard work actually works, use the internet for it's infinite leverage to make money fast.
I don't know, that's scratching the surface I guess, if you want to hear the best of his advice then there are some clips here on youtube, but tatespeech on rumble is where he posts content now.
I do not agree with everything that Andrew says, and certainly wouldn't phrase most things in the same way, but I do agree with OP that he's a reality check in a lot of ways for people who are disconnected with how difficult it really is to be a success and to act as an individual.
@@steveanton763 woman don't like to be objectify, but they always calls themselves the prize
@@johnnyson7474 😅 because they seem to always choose who wins.
Wow. The way Tate evaded many close ended tricky questions and proved his point is simply amazing. He is not one of those guys who simoly make a point without anything to back it up.
Then you havent watched enough Tate lol
@@xMckingwill Maybe all you have watched is a handful of reels about him which are taken out of context. lol
@@anantharamashok9501 Nah I have watched chunks of what he says with full context. Not simple reels. Take of your rose tinted glasses lol
@@xMckingwill An Anime and game addicted boy. Iam not surprised. Lets have the conversation once you grow up buddy.
@@anantharamashok9501 huh? We are having a conversation I didnt personally insult you idk what happened. 🤷♂️
I just stay chill the entire time they eventually give up, work's every time.
This video is so great. An objective, sober analysis of a conversation between two highly controversial persons where siding even a little bit with any one of them could get you ostracized. You managed to find something good in their behavior and their speech without codoning what each one of them stand for. Big respect for that! It takes skill to create informative content based on two people that many people don't want to touch with a then foot pole.
And the the level of detail is amazing. It's better than some expensive psychology courses.
Controversial is an understatement. I assume you well know why.
10:20 By the way, Tate wasn’t changing his opinions from his past self, he is just phrasing it in a way now that is more digestible for the audience.
1) Spot when they enter fight mode.
Subtle: Label YOU as an issue.
Misquoting you. Showing vS having respect is a big difference. Simple solution: reestablish your own point view before defending it.
Argue with you Before letting you explain.
2) Derailing interruptions before you can make a good point.
Pause, acknowledge the person (“Understood, Pierce; I respect you have the right to think that.”) continue arguing.
3) Preempt their interruption.
If they still interrupt, one finger stop gesture.
4) Don’t steamroll concessions.
Flip side: don’t be the interrupter and prevents you from reaching common ground.
You can’t make good points when ppl. Interrupt.
Physically relax into the argument by taking deep belly breaths.
5) Catch any logic gaps.
Remember the premise of their argument.
6) Draw a conversational boundary DIRECTLY.
7) Acknowledge any common ground.
Example: I completely agree. Genuine tone and voice. Then state what exactly you disagree with.
8) Give yourself permission to change your mind.
It’s not a sign of weakness. You do NOT need to change your preexisting self to fit your beliefs . Takes confidence to change belief in front of others.
"Gotcha" questions are also common among socially combative people. I dealt with this recently with a high ticket salesman. Everything was fine and friendly until I declined his offer. He then got defensive and made attempts to guilt trip me. Don't play into their game.
Piers is always do that “interrupting” people during interviews. Well handled Andrew. I like the finger method for stopping being interrupted. I am definitely going to try this.
I had the same hunch to just let them speak and return to my argument later, but unfortunately it doesn't always work - when you have limited time, and especially so if you also, at the same time, are arguing against status quo on that limited time. All that the other side has to do is to keep interrupting you
Love or hate Tate, you got to admit that he was more down to earth then Piers in this argument
Not hard, it's Piers Morgan. Andrew Tate is a manipulative jackass that built his empire on virgins idolozing him because a woman dumped them, Piers is just a straight up clown.
Even tho I hate Andrew and I know what he says is a complete nonsense 99% of the time I really respect how he handled the situation here and how calm he was.
@@hatersgottahatewejustgotta198 you’re a sheep and can’t comprehend the truth that’s why you think 99% of what he says is wrong
@@hatersgottahatewejustgotta198 tell me. What do you hate abt Andrew tate ?
I've been waiting for a charisma on command analysis of Tate, and you certainly delivered well so thank you
Always stay open minded by changing your mind if you think you were wrong about something. don't be too extreme, a middle ground is always the right place to be. If you have doubts about certain ideas, don't argue just to win the debate but exchange thoughts so you might find a better one to embrace. And when you discuss an idea that you strongly believe in, don't force others to embrace it but focus on learning more about what you already believe in, maybe there's something you missed. Also stay open minded, after all there's a possibility that you have embraced a wrong belief blindly, there's always a chance that you are wrong.
but if its a take from andrew tate dont because he is one of the most foul people to ever exist
A very well made video, everyone can benefit from such content because I love it when people have healthy debates and discussions
Not sure id call Piers rudely attacking tate a healthy discussion lol. He was a total dbag
Andrew Tate was very likely “prepped” for this meeting with Piers Morgan. Very smarty thing to do. A fighter to the core.
Why is no one concerned that tate literally said "I think my sister is her husbands property"? He's being cast in such a good light in this video despite his glaring moral issues. Surely another speaker could have been endorsed to demonstrate defending yourself in conversations. I didn't expect this from this channel.
I've heard nothing but bad things about Andrew Tate, but his attitude and social behavior here is genuinely praise worthy and something to learn.
I've always been aggressive and hyper, so speaking slowly and taking breaks is a must for me during debates.
Andrew didn't say it was bad to change your mind he said he is responsible for the things he has said. I think we all know that Andrew is fully capable of changing his mind seeing as he literally changed his whole religion. If somebody really thought changing their mind was bad they sure as Hell would not change their whole religion.
You need to adapt, for that you need change your perspectives. You don´t get where Tate is if you can`t change yourself and he aknowledges his saying with responsibility. You don`t talk lightly when you are aware of responsibility and weight of words.
He did not "change" his religion. He said Islam is the only true religion left on this earth because all other religions already started to water down their rules to fit with the modern woke ideals. So it's the religion that "changes their minds", not him. So he needs to convert to Islam which fits more with what he believes.
@@hkhan3535 He actually converted to Islam. There's videos of him praying in a mosque too.
@@hkhan3535 u don’t just go from being an atheist to a Muslim without completely disconnecting from your past ideologies on that stance.
@@migvel1711 since when Andrew converted from atheist? He was a Christian. Christianity and Islam are both Abrahamic religion. So it's normal for a Christian to convert to Islam.
This appearance by Tate was remarkable. Any other person would’ve gotten up and left
Piers Morgan is like debate practice for rich people. He smirks and grins as he uses these tricks, knowing full and well what he's doing. Notice he loses the smirk when Andrew parries it with his own debate training.
Mind games like this are just gross, man. I wish people were more consistently sincere and direct.
@@Brisingr73 it's a debate,man there's no right or wrong --- you were supposed to use your point and plotted your opponent point against themselves
It's an exercise in eristic discussion. 😂
@@CrabCrabCrabskateCrab are you kidding me ? He is trying to force stuff he misunderstood and saying that he said it when he didnt if you dont pay attention to those garbage people , theyre gonna eat you alive
Your channel is GOLD! I couldn't sit through the entire debate with AT and PM, but I did leave a comment mentioning how great your channel is and how it will help us with people like PM. And here we are a direct video about it! Thank you my dude! You're a legend and I've told at least 12 people in the real world about your channel 🙂♥️
you just showed some of the reasons why i despise arguing with people
Another classic Charisma on Command video, i appreciate each upload as they have helped me become a better person
It can be so incredibly though to come back to your point after being interrupted repeatedly well done to tate on this one
1. look them in eyes and look way they move their body
2. take deep slow breath
3. stay focused
4. look it from 3rd person (meaning it doesn't have to do with you it's their perspective, don't get it personal. If you get it personal they win)
5. W8 them to finish and ask them is that all, may I answer now. In same time you are saying to them that there is nothing special in what they said but still you "show respect" by asking may you answer now but actually you are luring their "YES" towards you giving yourself advantage over them and lowering their guard in same time.
6. Speak slow and low voice use hands up and down and nod your head so that they reflect that and start nod and follow hand gesture up and down (agreement movement) commanding it from them without saying it.
I end up being always right, because when I am wrong I change my mind
Hahahaha Tate. Like him or not, the man is an excellent communicator. His philosophy of approaching life like chess and staying 2 steps ahead at all times is intriguing. Also, Piers Morgan got outsmarted by some girl from Love Island, he never stood a chance against Tate 😂
When making a statement 1.) Preface by identifying what it is that you will speak about. 2.) Say what you have to say 3.) Close with "and that is what I have to say on that matter". That makes for better communication.
These videos are getting better and better each time
Yeah he’s gotten better over the years
Negativity is the greatest way to force the other person into fight mode to the point where they blunder more than they normally do
Well done looking objective on both parts, so we can learn both sides and the tools of charisma/ retosim. Enjoy how you calmly show each example right on the go.
Step 1. Realize (from previous knowledge of the person) that you are dealing with someone likely to do this to you.
Great point! Thanks for mentioning it!
true it felt like Tate was ready lol
4:22, Yes, I loved this one. His body language was saying "Oh no I can't interrupt him now, now what?"
I think the best response to being called out for things you said and did in the past is to own them and then simply DENY the other person an apology. For example:
"Do I agree with those things I said in the past? No. Today I realize those things were indeed problematic for many reasons. Do I regret saying those things? Absolutely not! Had I not said those things then I would never have had to face the immediate backlash and live through the push-back on my point of view. Without that push-back and backlash I would not have had the opportunity to learn and grow from it. So no! I do not regret saying those things nor do I apologize for it."
You GUYS!! this was the video I’ve been waiting for you to do! Thanks for covering argument tips! I’m not good at this, so fr sure I can’t wait to put these tips to practice thank you thank you!
Have a look at jbp and cathy newman
Nah they just afraid of getting cancel
I agree that openness to changing your mind is a powerful, positive thing. However, I don't think Andrew was wrong for holding strong to his position here. He can stand on his opinion, and that's ok too.
I think in this scenario you're right, Andrew wasn't meant to change his stance on anything with this mockery of an interview with Piers, he's the last person you'd want to have on the frontlines for thst one
I,m 15 and i used these to win a conversation against my school teacher and I,m very proud of my self.(I got suspended for three weeks)
Piers derives great pleasure and satisfaction from getting the people he interviews to say "I'm sorry". The motivation is beyond a journalistic motivation I think, he enjoys breaking them emotionally.
I love the way the guy says he's not endorsing anyone but basically praise Tate
no hes not lol
Where did he endorse him? He just said he handled the debate well.
tate just held his ground well and piers uses a lot of annoying tactics. not sure what else you want to do about it, maybe he's a bad man or maybe not but that's just how this interview went.
Tate deserves praise, anyone that wins over Morgan by the end of one of his interviews deserves some level of respect l, and if you watch the second interview Morgan does with rate, Morgan comes in with a completely different attitude and a higher level of respect for tate
He just showed what happened in the interview.
Arguing with my ex partner was dreadful - He has a perfide strategy of victimizing himself of being interrupted. Whenever you were in respond mode, he started talking over your response - When i however continued my response he took the offense of "being interrupted" twisting the fact for his side - Beware of such people .
It has been a minute since I watched some Charisma University videos. I used to binge them a lot as I enjoy very much the subjects and tips. Congratulations on 5M followers!
Piers : Read the 48 laws of power
Tate: Wrote the 48 laws of power
I think something that makes Andrew so good at debating and talking is that he’s genuinely being himself
ahyes hes so good at "debating" his garbage takes on women and is also one of the most detestiable people to ever exist
Two absolute masters with words it was spectacular to listen and watch this interview.
Actually funnily enough, I have gotten into pretty heated arguments with my mother because she is a pretty stubborn and hot headed person like I am, but in recent years, I’ve learned to do most of the things in this video just naturally because I realized that having shouting contests over the phone resolves nothing (and severely wastes my time as well). I don’t do it consistently enough to avoid shouting battles altogether, but I often catch myself starting to boil and immediately release the tension in my body and start talking slower as well, which in turn forces her to talk more calmly as well because now she is the only one upset. I don’t even know where I learned it but I think it’s just that the idea of “communication is key” was just in my head that I started looking for ways to stop getting into those tiring arguments and these were the conclusions I came up with as well.
But one thing I need to do is stop “steamrolling concessions”. I have a bad habit of going overboard and taking it too far once I feel that I’m on a roll and that I can potentially get my point across and change someone’s mind, that I start throwing my cards out with little to no restraint because I assume that that’s the window that I can “do all the damage” essentially. In reality, they may or may not be processing what you said and may potentially be annoyed that you aren’t even letting them speak despite holding out and temporarily conceding to you so that the conversation can progress.
It is crazy that Tristan and Andrew get along with Peirs now adays. They have respect for one another. Battles do this
Crazy to see how excellent Andrew Tate is at listening and speaking. Would love to learn that!
Piers operates like a bully.
fr
I’ve been through debating with guys like piers and if you are in the right, it is really easy to win over the conversation .
The easiest way is to be around people and let them agree with what you say, it will end up making the bully in the conversation gives up.
In a firm and well mannered way of course .
Hahahaha so does Tate 🤣
It’s amazing that you also given us the example of misquoting around this part 10:00 😂
the level of andrew tate's social awareness is so rare
Last part of this was awesome. The point/lesson of allowing yourself to change your opinions from past without worrying so much ... allowing you to grow... yeah. Good stuff.
About 4 months ago a lady crashed into me. There's no sugar coating it, it was completely and totally her fault. I got out my car and approached her to see if she was hurt. She walked out, vape in hand, shouting "what the f***" and immediately blaming me for HER crash. I politely told her that she crashed into me and I had nothing to do with it. As a young driver I called my mother who arrive a few minutes later and as I tried explaining the details of the crash, the lady consistently interrupted me saying I had crashed into her. I politely asked her to stop interrupting to which she said "I'm not going to stop interrupting you" and started explaining how she thought I had driven straight into her. So I raised my finger and said "No that's not what happened" to which she screamed "Don't shove your finger in my face"
So despite following a number of these steps I've come to realise the key detail is not to sympathise with an attacker. It is important that yes, you do not come across as aggressive or rude, but know that being defensive to them is exactly what they want. Its better to simply consider yourself above the person you are talking to and make them aware (without directly saying so) that they are only a minor inconvenience to you, that their attacks really mean nothing. Maybe give a little snigger after they twist your words, or laugh a little when they say something ridiculous to attack you. Because at the end of the day the outcome is usually the same, few people win an argument against the opponent, instead., you want to win the crowd
Piers Morgan just loves to wind people up and upset them, he is just not a nice person at all
Looks to me more like he just has very strong beliefs and can't reconcile those beliefs with other people having different but valid points of view. The guy's not perfect but he did at least treat Andrew as a person and tried to connect with him. Most people in that political wing don't even try to do that.
Unfortunate thing about today is that so many on both sides can't even contemplate the idea of the other side being right, and it hurts them both.
This is a tremendous breakdown. Take out personal bias and this is a true masterclass of healthily debating.
Tate: ya thats your opinion
Piers: no no thats my view
Literally the same thing.
Andrew talking about reality and reality cant be changed👍👍