Nokia still the best. I don't understand why everyone says that the Huawei is better? Well... If you want to take spontaneous pictures then yes, it is better. But Nokia will always take better pictures. You only have to a bit patient. It is not that hard. And the result will be mind-blowing. #nokia9pureview #itdidnotbeatnokia
Maybe Nokia would get better reviews, if they added a selector to adjust the amount of dynamic range in jpeg shots. Like you can use a slider to adjust the ev, before a shot. That way people not shooting raws, would also have the benefit of the multiple sensors.
Nokia processes several photos together to make a new photo and you call that raw photos???? How could you call a processed photo 'raw photos', it just like the night mode(taking several photos to bring more details to one) with different kind of algorithm.
I own a Nokia 9 ( I actually post RAWs of my photos on a public Google Drive ) and I agree with you. Problem with the Nokia 9 is NOT the hardware. It's the software. In low light the software has no idea what to do so it pushes ISO to 6400 and uses a 1/33 exposure, which doesn't work at all. In Manual mode the Nokia 9 can actually get better than Night Sight results if you know what you're doing. I actually have photos where I prove this on my twitter and in my RAW archive. A sure sign that the hardware can do the task but the software needs to be tuned. The Nokia 9 RAWs are incredible I'll admit. You really see the 9 cameras work their magic when you look at shots where highlights would have normally been blown out... Especially clouds.
I have Lumia 950 XL, so the quality of the shots in good conditions of light are still incredible. But since I need to buy a new phone for obvious reasons, as W10M is dead, I was thinking about a P30 Pro, Nokia 9 or Pixel 3 XL, considering I will never spend 800/1.000€ for a phone. Nokia 9 has no OIS: I find it a serious failure the absence of OIS in a cameraphone of 2019. What's your opinion as owner of the phone? Photo elaboration speed: is still so slow elaborating the shots of the 5 sensors? Hopefully Nokia 9.1 Pureview will solve some issue... And besides the camera department, fingerprint scanner I read everywhere it's really bad implemented. It's doesn't always work as it should.
@@lielbouskila9853 You can get depth in the raw file when shooting in live focus mode. But you won't be able to choose how shallow it is (you probably won't want tbh)
Great video and comparison! And great music by the way with the famous Nokia tune and it's origin (Gran Vals of Francisco Tarrega)! Absolutely liked it!
I recently changed from a Huawei Mate 10 Pro to the Nokia 9. I would like to add that there are some attributes about the Huawei that I really enjoy. First, it has zero shutter lag. Now, the Nokia 9 will actually shoot pretty fast, you can not worried about the photos being stitched together in the background and continue to take pictures. However, the shutter speed on the Huawei was fast! I like the black and white photos of the Huawei that has the dedicated black and white sensor. I think they look better than the Nokia 9 black and white pictures. However, I noticed that the Huawei tends to beautify everything. That is to say that was selfies there is a very aggressive beauty mode and with other photographs they have a tendency to blow out colors. This isn't a bad thing, as it makes pictures very beautiful. However I really enjoyed the true-to-life colors and tones at the Nokia 9 is giving me. The only other issue is that I found the Huawei mate 10 Pro to do better in low-light than the Nokia 9. The Nokia 9 does okay, but not as well as my Huawei mate 10 Pro did.
Yea, it's the whole point of raw. People seem to forget that a £4000 pro Nikon camera still can't produce certain colours accurately, the p30 certainly seems to be more 'off' than usual for certain colours but as a p30 owner and professional photographer I know I personally made the right decision, for versatility, image quality and speed the p30 pro is unbeatable (in my opinion) I had the Lumia 1020 years ago and the image quality was stunning but as a usable camera it was just too slow, sometimes it's worth taking a hit on sight image quality for a better overall experience.
+Ond Mon How fast is P30 shutter(taking photo), is it nearly instant or is there any small delay I experience sometimes with some other phones? How about speed in dim light (not night scene). I personally like google pixel 3XL photos, its stunning with just one lens but ehm 9h of screen-on time and that horrible topnotch is big no no for me... as now I have Oukitel WP2 phone (and k10000max) with 10000mah battery and 400g weight and I do not want kids toy phone anymore, pity they didn't focus more on cameras coz it would be world best phone for travelling and everything. Photos are decent but slow unless you're in daylight. I do not get why expensive flagship phones has this horrible batteries and shit, not all want 100g super-thin phone, gimme manly heavy fat beast paddle with 10000mah, best camera+software, stereo speakers, jack, ip68, FLAT display bright on sun without any notch and I will even create altair at home with brand name.... so simple expectations yet every company develop same shit every year adding shit nobody cares like round display corners..why the heck round or foldable lol? Just put big battery + good camera, done.
To be fair, u should compare the P30 Pro RAW using pixel binning in 10mp. It resulting into 2.0 micron pixel size. Nokia using 5 stitched images, why not compare P30 in their best mod?
Nokia 9 with Zeiss optics is unbeatable.. Nokia is better in camera since Nokia N9, L920, 1520, 950XL.. I am still using lumia 950 xl for smartphone camera
You can use Adobe softwares like Photoshop or Lightroom for that. I think that there are also other photo editing software that can do the job, but Adobe's the one I familiar the most.
Regarding image quality,P30 Pro is no match for Nokia 9. We are continually watching the horrible colours of the photos and videos taken by the P30 Pro. A camera with poor image quality( though full of features) could never be the best. I think comparing this phone to any Nokia Pureview phone is insignificant! In fact,the P30 Pro is deliberately overhyped. Perhaps the game of money and bias!
P30 Pro's processing is where the hype is not the manual mode. If you want best pictures then use the AI Master Mode and take normal pictures not Raw. If you want Raw then Nokia 9 or Pixel 3.
Nokia processes several photos together to make a new photo and you call that raw photos???? How could you call a processed photo 'raw photos', it just like the night mode(taking several photos to bring more details to one) with different kind of algorithm.
I guess they all have different opinions. But bear in mind that the Nokia 9 is ment more to be a niche mobile, made for people who like to adjust and tinker with picture processing. ruclips.net/video/cMsT0Z2W-0o/видео.html
This channel only highlight nokia brand.. i also believe nokia 9 details are really better.. but details are not onlything can mesure image qulity..colours ,hdr,exposure ,zoom,low light and video stabilization? I personaly know nokia 9 is poor low-light competitor.. but this channel shows totally different..
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
That's exactly what i was waiting for. That's what i call a camera test. Thank you so much.
Nice video!! Your channel deserves millions of subscribers.
Nokia coming back! I have 808 and Pixel. I'd like 9
Nokia still the best. I don't understand why everyone says that the Huawei is better? Well... If you want to take spontaneous pictures then yes, it is better. But Nokia will always take better pictures. You only have to a bit patient. It is not that hard. And the result will be mind-blowing.
#nokia9pureview
#itdidnotbeatnokia
Maybe Nokia would get better reviews, if they added a selector to adjust the amount of dynamic range in jpeg shots. Like you can use a slider to adjust the ev, before a shot. That way people not shooting raws, would also have the benefit of the multiple sensors.
@@clausgedved8728 interesting idea
Nokia processes several photos together to make a new photo and you call that raw photos???? How could you call a processed photo 'raw photos', it just like the night mode(taking several photos to bring more details to one) with different kind of algorithm.
I own a Nokia 9 ( I actually post RAWs of my photos on a public Google Drive ) and I agree with you.
Problem with the Nokia 9 is NOT the hardware.
It's the software.
In low light the software has no idea what to do so it pushes ISO to 6400 and uses a 1/33 exposure, which doesn't work at all.
In Manual mode the Nokia 9 can actually get better than Night Sight results if you know what you're doing.
I actually have photos where I prove this on my twitter and in my RAW archive.
A sure sign that the hardware can do the task but the software needs to be tuned.
The Nokia 9 RAWs are incredible I'll admit.
You really see the 9 cameras work their magic when you look at shots where highlights would have normally been blown out... Especially clouds.
Give us some tips for low light and night pictures please!
@@Neoplasmosis Just interested with 2 things:
A. Can you get the depth processing in RAW photos?
B. Does the camera have some sort of lossless zoom?
I have Lumia 950 XL, so the quality of the shots in good conditions of light are still incredible. But since I need to buy a new phone for obvious reasons, as W10M is dead, I was thinking about a P30 Pro, Nokia 9 or Pixel 3 XL, considering I will never spend 800/1.000€ for a phone.
Nokia 9 has no OIS: I find it a serious failure the absence of OIS in a cameraphone of 2019. What's your opinion as owner of the phone?
Photo elaboration speed: is still so slow elaborating the shots of the 5 sensors?
Hopefully Nokia 9.1 Pureview will solve some issue...
And besides the camera department, fingerprint scanner I read everywhere it's really bad implemented. It's doesn't always work as it should.
@@lielbouskila9853 You can get depth in the raw file when shooting in live focus mode. But you won't be able to choose how shallow it is (you probably won't want tbh)
Finally. Thanks for such awesome comparison, waiting for more 400, or 800 iso shots outdoors at night 😁😁😁
I have these on my Google drive
Nokia legend phone in the world
I love every single video by youuu and your classic music special
Very interesting... It’s impossible to say from the video alone, but what camera has the more true to life photo colours?
Great video and comparison! And great music by the way with the famous Nokia tune and it's origin (Gran Vals of Francisco Tarrega)! Absolutely liked it!
Nokia 9..underrated ..but king of mobile photography.
I recently changed from a Huawei Mate 10 Pro to the Nokia 9. I would like to add that there are some attributes about the Huawei that I really enjoy. First, it has zero shutter lag. Now, the Nokia 9 will actually shoot pretty fast, you can not worried about the photos being stitched together in the background and continue to take pictures. However, the shutter speed on the Huawei was fast! I like the black and white photos of the Huawei that has the dedicated black and white sensor. I think they look better than the Nokia 9 black and white pictures. However, I noticed that the Huawei tends to beautify everything. That is to say that was selfies there is a very aggressive beauty mode and with other photographs they have a tendency to blow out colors. This isn't a bad thing, as it makes pictures very beautiful. However I really enjoyed the true-to-life colors and tones at the Nokia 9 is giving me. The only other issue is that I found the Huawei mate 10 Pro to do better in low-light than the Nokia 9. The Nokia 9 does okay, but not as well as my Huawei mate 10 Pro did.
Nice comparison. I was wondering since its a Raw comparison. Isn't it possible to correct the color of the flowers on the P30 pro shots at 3:27?
ofcourse, this compare shows nothing but sharpness, thats it coz u can tweak raw as u wish to get expected output
Yea, it's the whole point of raw. People seem to forget that a £4000 pro Nikon camera still can't produce certain colours accurately, the p30 certainly seems to be more 'off' than usual for certain colours but as a p30 owner and professional photographer I know I personally made the right decision, for versatility, image quality and speed the p30 pro is unbeatable (in my opinion) I had the Lumia 1020 years ago and the image quality was stunning but as a usable camera it was just too slow, sometimes it's worth taking a hit on sight image quality for a better overall experience.
+Ond Mon How fast is P30 shutter(taking photo), is it nearly instant or is there any small delay I experience sometimes with some other phones? How about speed in dim light (not night scene).
I personally like google pixel 3XL photos, its stunning with just one lens but ehm 9h of screen-on time and that horrible topnotch is big no no for me... as now I have Oukitel WP2 phone (and k10000max) with 10000mah battery and 400g weight and I do not want kids toy phone anymore, pity they didn't focus more on cameras coz it would be world best phone for travelling and everything. Photos are decent but slow unless you're in daylight.
I do not get why expensive flagship phones has this horrible batteries and shit, not all want 100g super-thin phone, gimme manly heavy fat beast paddle with 10000mah, best camera+software, stereo speakers, jack, ip68, FLAT display bright on sun without any notch and I will even create altair at home with brand name.... so simple expectations yet every company develop same shit every year adding shit nobody cares like round display corners..why the heck round or foldable lol? Just put big battery + good camera, done.
That video thumbnail alone already tells me that the 9PV is a much better than the P30 Pro, and boy... I am not disappointed! 🤗
To be fair, u should compare the P30 Pro RAW using pixel binning in 10mp. It resulting into 2.0 micron pixel size.
Nokia using 5 stitched images, why not compare P30 in their best mod?
Amazing comparison..!!
The relaxing music was low on sound...else everything was good...!!
I think the Nokia 9 may be correcting perspective or am I just losing my mind?
Nokia😍😍😍😍
Oh dear.... who need digital camera now. More camera company will close down in coming year.....
Nokia 9 Pureview
I really want Nokia 9 but i dislike the battery life. I'm drooling for one.
Nokia what a come back😯
NOKIA is legend no need to compare!!!!
OIS?
Wow Nokia 9
Nokia 9 with Zeiss optics is unbeatable.. Nokia is better in camera since Nokia N9, L920, 1520, 950XL..
I am still using lumia 950 xl for smartphone camera
P30 Pro sensor used the RYYB sensor instead of RGB.
Definitely Nokia is better 👌🏼
Why not have mic test.
Nokia best I’m think
How did you convert raws to jpegs?
You can use Adobe softwares like Photoshop or Lightroom for that. I think that there are also other photo editing software that can do the job, but Adobe's the one I familiar the most.
Nokia the best camera phone....
Nokia 9 is the king!!!
Nokia 9 pureview is the best camera phone in the universe.
What about dark?
Would you be kind enough to reveal the firmware version of this Nokia 9? Is it running V4.22D build?
Nokia 9 best camera phone ever
We have a wimner here!!! Nokia is amazing
Nokia😎👍
I like Nokia 9 pure and I think Nokia is winner best of luck ho like Nokia please support to try
Vundiva Nokia
Nokia camera images have more details, better dynamic range and realistic color.
That's because it uses 5 cameras at the same time
Lumia 1020 the best
Used it a lot, now it's dead and can't buy new one
Kai ZX I have this one)
Nokia has more experience in camera 📸 ... Huawei is also good but nokia is best
Regarding image quality,P30 Pro is no match for Nokia 9. We are continually watching the horrible colours of the photos and videos taken by the P30 Pro. A camera with poor image quality( though full of features) could never be the best. I think comparing this phone to any Nokia Pureview phone is insignificant! In fact,the P30 Pro is deliberately overhyped. Perhaps the game of money and bias!
What do you mean with poor video quality? I think Nokia wins but the video quality is not bad at the p30pro.
@@elementoryking4452 I think he was addressing the colour quality of the Huawei P30 pro. The colours often seems off, especially reds and yellow.
@@clausgedved8728 Thanks a lot.
P30 Pro's processing is where the hype is not the manual mode. If you want best pictures then use the AI Master Mode and take normal pictures not Raw. If you want Raw then Nokia 9 or Pixel 3.
Nokia always a legend... ❤️
Nokia processes several photos together to make a new photo and you call that raw photos???? How could you call a processed photo 'raw photos', it just like the night mode(taking several photos to bring more details to one) with different kind of algorithm.
Nokia 9 can take RAW photo, and it looks totally different compared to the same photo in JPEG.
Now with Mate 30 Pro
Lol. The channel's name says it all.
As one guy said above "Nokia legend phone in the world"
the comment section is cancer
I still believe Europe brand better than China's brand
HUAWEI has pixel Bining Use 10 MP it gets by 40mp
. Nokia 9 PureView
Nokia is best
#Nokia is the clear winner but the majority of people are running behind cheap #chinese phones
Huawei is a lot better in night shots. Day time photoes taken by Nokia looks more saturated. Happy to see Nokia is coming back, but a long way to go.
Nokia looks more saturated because of the usual RGB arrangement. Huawei's RYYB doesn't look right, just look at 1:08.
Nokia win
good camera, bad battery..( and bad finger sensor )
Nokia is winner
Huewai camera good
Only in low light and zoom in JPEG.
Raw files definitely goes to Nokia. But come on people! We live in a world where we just point and shoot and post.. #realtalk
Not everyone love point and shoot and upload the picture instantly to the instagram.
+Rausyan Safwan I'm with you, I don't point and shoot all the time.
@@FAT8893 you don´t but millions of others do. you are in minor group of who takes photo in manual mode.
Pixel
p30 pro is far better than nokia 9..Fake video make nokia 9 is better...
Stfu cry baby
@@greenboy5638 lol.. ruclips.net/video/WPtNTpOvhvc/видео.html rip nokia fanboys👈😂
I guess they all have different opinions. But bear in mind that the Nokia 9 is ment more to be a niche mobile, made for people who like to adjust and tinker with picture processing. ruclips.net/video/cMsT0Z2W-0o/видео.html
This channel only highlight nokia brand.. i also believe nokia 9 details are really better.. but details are not onlything can mesure image qulity..colours ,hdr,exposure ,zoom,low light and video stabilization? I personaly know nokia 9 is poor low-light competitor.. but this channel shows totally different..
@@rusirubatuwatta8731 It's because he is using raw images. Most previous comparisons, has been comparisons with the phones own jpeg processing.
I like Nokia 9 pure and I think Nokia is winner best of luck ho like Nokia please support to try