Not that surprising to me...i've seen something like these standards from other sources quite earlier on, perhaps most people simply gotten overly distracted with much of the negativity publicity floating around that they overlooked the positives of it.
First video I found in RUclips comparing the two. Kudos to you. Finally a Nokia 9 in good hands. Still can't understand why those famous RUclipsrs are not daring enough for any Nokia 9 comparison videos.
Nokia is almost dead bro... And the people just follows the flow, most of people more cares about huawei, samsung, and iPhones.. it's the hype and AdSense if you know what I mean....
Wauu I realy can't guess that Nokia 9 has such a good performance in details with natural colours! from this review I am sure Nokia 9 is my dream smartphone!
You have done what many refused to do. To compete 9PV directly to P30P. I'm truly speechless. I was expecting P30P to wipe 9V. Even thought you had the labels mixed up. Few questions. Were this direct jpg shot or raw edited? And just to be sure,no night mode was used for the P30P? I'm amazed if this truly are 9PV native jpg output. Owe Sarvikas an apology.
I have to admit the Nokia 9 can give some really good details in daylight! The B&W sensors can add some great dynamic range. Night and zoom are clearly a defeat for obvious reasons (sensor size, aperture and optical zoom in favor of Huawei). The problem is Nokia 9 has still fingerprint issue and some not nice flaws. Also slow image processing. Who owns a Nokia 9 can tell us about software updates and fixes.
Colours on the Nokia 9 are strongly realistic. Above all,the outcome of any camera battle against Nokia 9 Pureview is now a foregone conclusion! No surprise here. It is PUREVIEW!
No they are not realistic at all, in most cases they are darker and oversharpenned, even the sky is going red by 9PW 1:19, so what are you talking about?
The crops from the N9 suffers a little from oversharpening. Nokia just released a firmware update dealing with this issue. Do you know if it improved the jpeg output?
Were these pictures post-processed or captured straight into jpeg and then incorporated into the video ? Hmmm. Gotta admit I expected the Nokia 9PV not to be so close to the P30, Actually, it seemed more natural and sharper in many instances. Indeed, there is a lot of hype for the I know there is no OIS for the N9PV, which is a bummer but the way the phone was designed it would have been impossible to produce a single picture from a collection of stabilized photos where the lenses would have slight differences of the frame they capture while they are moving because of OIS and the ever so slight movement of hands. Kind Request : Always include your shooting modes parameters and the megapixels each phone incorporates on each shot, as well as if you are using tripods or not.
This is the comparision I'm waiting for,because I want to buy the Nokia,seriously.😃 No doubt,the Nokia it's better in all conditions.More natural,more sharper,more realistic,and with more definition!!!and an incredible dinamic range!!!😍 Huawei only it's better in zoom,but usually,I don't use it.😏 Shut up,and take my money,Nokia!!!🤑
It's worth mentioning that, just like the Nokia 9, the P30 will also receives plenty of updates. The software is still not optimal, having Huawei changed to a new sensor with a uncommon color array. Takes time to perfect the algorithms.
Was a tripod used for the Nokia low light images? For such a slow shutter speed, the images appear to be stable. Also we’re the images edited post production?
I like nokia but I have to be fair.. in low light mode the iso in the nokia is always to high, thats on purpose by the fotographer to captur more light but it will capture more noise too. The post processing of the p30 its still unbeatable. Nice try Nokia.
I never do any detailed review when it comes to this kind of comaprison video. But since these two Android smartphones are currently the hot topic and I have utmost interest with these two, I would make an exception here. 1:08 I find that the 9PV have a much better colour balance than the P30P. Just look at the pavement behind that Mustang. 1:382:182:34 I can definitely can see clearer details on the 9PV. 1:503:295:28 The 9PV have cooler and sharper looking photo than the P30P. At 1:50, the P30P photo looked like as if it had applied some red or purple tint. 2.05 There seems to be no shadow inside the flower on the 9PV photo. But to be honest, I still find the P30P photo still look amazing despite the little shadow. A considerable draw here. 2:49 The sky looked different. I'm not sure which one I would have. 🤔 3:02 The colour on the P30P looked more vibrant than the 9PV. 3:504:174:315:556:087:529:22 The P30P have lower ISO than the 9PV, so that might explain the rather dimmed photo. At 5:55, notice the half circle mirror above the entrance door. At 6:08, notice the vase. 4:028:06 Again, the sky looked different and the 9PV looked cooler than the P30P. 4:44 Now the 9PV looked dimmer than the P30P, but I noticed that the seeds on the 9PV looked crisper. 4:59 The P30P looked more exposed, hence the obvious whiteness, but I noticed a starkling difference from the brake lights. Which one looks real? 🤔 5:147:24 The P30P doesn't exhibit too much exposure compared to 9PV. Might be because of its lower ISO. 5:42 I noticed a different shade of yellow here. 6:426:577:107:388:248:37 I'm rather amazed by the sharpness of the 9PV despite the zoom. 8:529:35 It seemed that the P30P have a much cleaner looking photo than the 9PV.
To sum up, both phones performs well. Difficult choice for sure, but I do definitely lean a bit towards the 9PV for its sharpness. That said, there are certain elements that the P30P do better than the 9PV. P.S. Is it possible for you to have a shootout between the P30 Pro and the Nokia Lumia 1020?
Wow Nokia is always best but little disappointment in the zoom range but it's not a big problem because no one going to zoom and take pictures always Nokia 9 PureView then name it deserve awesome coverage thanks a lot
Well, wait! A 5X optical zoom is a great thing! If you are a bit far from the object you want to capture, for example a monument or inside a cathedral, you can get a lot of details with such a zoom. It's everything but useless. These shots of Nokia 9 are coming from RAW, I guess, because the jpg out of the box is really bad. I know because I've seen samples in RAW and jpg online, and the difference is noticeable.
Unfinished : Indeed, there is a lot of hype for the P30 Pro. No doubt, that the P30 Pro is a great device, with many nice features. Competition brings advancements faster. Still, I never would support them, for various reasons. One of the problems is that they get the praise they deserve or a little more than that and other brands get underscores and pushed aside. HTC and especially LG for instance, has been producing some great phones for years, namely the V20,V30,V40. Nokia being a truly beloved brand for what they have given us, many years before anyone could deliver anything close to Nokia's offerings. Hope they will continue to innovate and the next PureView could land on my hands. Thank you for another great video!
If you use night mode of Huawei P30 pro under the daylight, it takes several photos to make a better image and it takes longer time to process just like the Nokia 9 PV.
My belief remains that it needs a competent user to bring out the best of what the device is actually capable of producing ?! It appears quite some users 'not up to the mark' in knowing how to use it properly so they conclude it's a 'lousy' device ?! As far as personal preference goes, i'll certainly select the Nokia 9 PV over these Huawei or Samsung or Apple or Google etc. as i consider the Nokia going the step in a fundamentally different direction with a promising prospect, of course they need to follow up with at least mitigation if not eventual elimination of the negative issues hindering it in terms of the user experience or user friendliness etc. As far as branding goes, i have more 'traditional trust' in the Leica, Zeiss & Nokia while i have to consider the Huawei the 'odd one out' ! Through Leica, Huawei manages to come out with very competent 'camera-in-a-phone's but ultimately i still won't 'trust' Huawei on the same level as a Nokia...whether it be with 5G network or a handphone, so for more 'peace of mind' is also a great reason to settle for the Nokia.
Wait what? I thought N9P was very worse!? I wish N9P would get rid of that oversharpening caused by all the cameras cuz It looks too strong sometimes but there is definitively detail!
The reason the Preview got such bad press: Slow camera performance. Yeah it takes great photos when the stars align but for day-to-day shots, it's going to lose to iPhones and Huaweis. You have to consider what type of photographer you are to make the best use of the tool at hand. Are you a burst or composed shooter?
I've recently started using my new Nokia 9PV...initial impressions overall are impressive whether in photo or video. My comparison device is my other phone the Huawei P20Pro. The image fusion process in the 9PV (which makes this device unique form ANY other current production camera-centric smartphone ?) results in some obvious lag in overall imaging processing speed but the end results more than 'justify' the delays as far as i'm concerned ! My Huawei captures faster photos but due to the overall less 'accurate' default image i actually waste more time manually editing the initial photo to get closer to what my own eye sees & even then it does not match the 'standard' produced by the 9PV from it's default 'slow' processing ?! Of course not every shot should be that satisfying but nevertheless all my initial positive impressions from my own 9PV experiences indicates to me the 9PV is in a different league of camera phone...which may never see another brand trying to produce a similar product due to the departure by the Light company away from smartphone imaging etc. Those 'experts' who keep harping on the relatively slow imaging processing speed of the Nokia 9PV are to me like those people blindly complaining of the slow recharging times of EV's versus petrol or diesel fossil vehicles i.e. take too slow to get filled up yet range is still shorter etc. i.e. they trying some apple to orange practically irrelevant comparision ?! Fundamentally different design concepts each have their respective pros & cons so superficial comparisons does NOT mean much ?! As such the Nokia 9PV should be compared to another camera-centric smartphone also with image fusion technology (if any exists around that is) THEN only can conclude if it's relatively faster or slower...otherwise in the meantime, the Nokia 9PV is in a unique class of it's own 'above' (not 'below') in terms of the quality standard of it's imaging output resulting from it's unique method of processing & production !! When it comes to video, from my usage of my 9PV as vehicle camcorder to record my road trip videos, i notice the quality of detailing, sharpness overall (whether day or nite) is comparable if not better than my Huawei-Leica device. Low light noise management is far superior than on say the Nokia 8 or 7+ devices, is at least on par with my Huawei device. Bottomline for me is the capability to capture photo/video which 'accurately' reflects what my own eyes see i.e. accurate colour, exposure etc. reproduction in which case the 9PV tends to produce better colour accuracy with as good if not better exposure & sharpness than my Huawei P20Pro..done with overall similar levels of 'smoothness' performance in the execution of the video playback. Also, so far it appears to me the default Nokia-Zeiss camera app with the 9PV seem less competent in video capture than the Opencam app in that the Opencam app results in more uniformly distributed sharpness resulting in not only better detailing but also more accurate exposure reproduction & management ? As if it appears like the Nokia-Zeiss uses say only 1 camera to take videos while the opencam uses all 5 cameras ?! Whatever the reality behind it, the results of my (still very prelimilary) videos seem to suggest to me i get better videos using Opencam instead of the default Nokia-Zeiss app, with the only advantage of the default app is in the superior audio capture quality using all mics while the 3rd party apps like Opencam use only 2 of the mics ?!? The audio quality when using Ozo audio capable device (which 9PV is) with 3rd party apps like Opencam also (finally) have improved in that those annoying audio distortions (which i experienced with my Nokia 8 & 7+) appear now gone in the 9PV...at least now the audio is basically 'hearable' although of course overall inferior compared to if recorded using Ozo spatial effect of the original Nokia-Zeiss camera app. Overall still 'early' into my 'exploration journey' into my Nokia 9 PV yet the experience so far tells me this is indeed a basically 'different' class of device with much un-explored untapped potential waiting to be discovered & put to practical use !
I don't want to sound too cautious, but if the Nokia 9 images comes from RAW and not directly from jpgs, then there's a clear difference. The jpgs out of the box are bad, if they didn't fix them. I've checked an online review with both RAW and jpgs and the difference is clear.
5 лет назад+1
Huawei: pushing mobile photography. Nokia: Let's just put more camera in.
Yeah! Nokia has great image quality, but... in low light condition it should be better and it's not. What's more, Nokia 9 has a lot of lens but there is no ultra-wide or 2x zoom. We have got 5 lens that provide only quality without any extras. I think we should expect more. For example Pixel 3 has only one len, but it provides also great image quality, lowlight mode (NighSide), awesome image stabilization and SuperZoom thanks to its software.
in DayLight HDR & Sharpness & Bookeh Mode :- Clearly Nokia 9PV win & other stuff P30P win thats all my opinion ............. & Nokia Shots feels like Naturals colour .
W0w I like the Nokia better overall, and p30 ever so slightly in night shots. I am thinking most reviewers just set it to apple google samsung style automode and picks which one looks best after a few shots and forget it and call it a reviewk, without going any deeper in to the manual modes and post processing.
Yesterday I was using Nokia 9 and it is just disgusting at making photos, only 1 of 10 made photos is so so, others are just trash, unfocused unnatural colors so unnatural that human faces are red pumpkins, lol, it is not cameraphone it is just another beta version of lightcamera. And I know what you would say, and the answer is, yes it has the last April's firmware V4.22C that fixed many camera bugs, but it still has so much to fix that I can't call it more than a beta device.
•••once again nokia, Congratulations to you. We all remember Lumia 1020 ?...I still have mine with it's 41megal pixels, am glad they are back and hope to get my nokia9pv soon.
what are saying Bro!!!!!p30 is a disappointment. ...it's in top of dxo mark ....99% you tubers has gave it the crown of camera sensation of the year...it has 50xxxxxxxxxxxxxx zoom by which you can zoom upto your soul...it can take the picture in pitch black so that u can see inside of a black hole...(its an irony vin diesel did not have it at that time ..if he had he might be able to save his girl friend) .................. what are u saying ?? u may lose your job by saying it....
Liked your sarcasm. Dxomark is shit. But p30 pro deserves to sit at the top spot amongst the phones they reviewed. Atleast they are innovating unlike Samsung and Apple. Nokia 9 gives it a tough fight and even outshines it in some scenarios at near 60% price point
Those who trust dxomark are noob . Dxomark only promoted smartphone or camera company who paid them . Those who didnt pay to dxomark would get scores which is even worse than iphone 6. For example nokia 8 who is excellent than iphone 6 but still get lower mark than iphone 6 which is clearly beaten by the mighty lumia 1020. Sony also shares the same fate as the noki smartphone because they didnt paid or bribe dxomark.
Nokia 9 Pure view is the clear winner in All aspects. Camera is better in terms of details in 9Pureview when compared to P30pro. SD845 of Nokia 9pureview is almost similar flagship processor (but slightly older) like Huawei's Kirin 980. Nokia having pure Android One platform. So it's better than Huawei's EMUI. One more very important thing, Nokia 9Pureview is Rs.20000/- cheaper than Huawei P30pro. So, Nokia 9Pureview is the clear winner here.
This compression is nothing but a joke. Obviously, p30p has a better dynamic range and better colors. And the pictures took by Nokia at nite remind me of phones ten years ago. I have to say there is some tiny parts that Nokia may do a better job, but based on this youtubers whole video with biases, I have to say, Nokia 9 pureview is trash
Why don't you check out the same comparison as above but with RAW photo. I totally would leave the P30 Pro behind. ruclips.net/video/mxnwzc1FHHo/видео.html
Omg Nokia wins this one. Day to day normal lighting the Nokia gives great colors and detail is way better than p30pro. Also 2x zoom was so good on Nokia than on p30pro, however the 5x zoom was better on p30pro. P30pro bit better in low light. Portraits no competition Nokia did much better. Nokia also deserves credit for this camera. Huawei p30pro can great on zoom and Huawei didn’t have to lie about the moon mode, they show that if you a liar you remain a liar, it’s not the first time
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I was totally surprised with photos taken from Nokia. The photo is quite detailed, sharp, not battered. Congratulations Nokia
Not that surprising to me...i've seen something like these standards from other sources quite earlier on, perhaps most people simply gotten overly distracted with much of the negativity publicity floating around that they overlooked the positives of it.
Nokia 9 for me is better than huawei p30 pro
Exception in the long range zoom part where the Leica lens looks to have superior definition..
@@hseochin not because of Leica it's from the periscope camera
Zeiss lenses are better than Leica
@@pritammandal296 no
@@kevingarcia615 are Leica lens better than Zeiss lenses. I don't think so
The Zeiss Lens are to much better , since the Nokia 808 Pureview
"Reviews have praised the Huawei and bashed the Nokia. But is it so straightforward?"
Because Nokia didn't pay bribe
Exactly bro. See here 1:36 only blind can't judge.
Oversharped and un-natural shots from P30 pro
@@mohammadrafeh9962 This is the final truth about the images taken by P30 Pro.
So much hype? Really fishy!
Actually Nokia don't pay bribe for hype that's why every reviewer says they're not good.
The best way to shut the haters of nokia...
Could you kindly share the source images with the original EXIFs without tuning - for both smartphones? Thank you.
I wish he'd would but the n9 images are processed raw
Nokia 9 best Photo naturals...!!!
Nokia 9 Pureview camera more better than Huawei P30 pro...
Nokia is always No.1👑👑👑
First video I found in RUclips comparing the two. Kudos to you. Finally a Nokia 9 in good hands. Still can't understand why those famous RUclipsrs are not daring enough for any Nokia 9 comparison videos.
Well most of them complain about the processing time taken for the 9PV, so that might explain it.
Because it is Nokia!
Nokia don't pay for it....
Nokia is almost dead bro... And the people just follows the flow, most of people more cares about huawei, samsung, and iPhones.. it's the hype and AdSense if you know what I mean....
Wauu I realy can't guess that Nokia 9 has such a good performance in details with natural colours! from this review I am sure Nokia 9 is my dream smartphone!
Fans of Nokia & Huawei may biased on their respective phones but No doubt, Nokia 9PV excels...
Yes nokia is the best . But p30 pro is not a disappointment .
Huwawei Can not comptite with Nokia...
Nokia is king 😎😎😎😎
Nokia 9 pureview more better, probably 5 level 😂😂😂
To sum up, both phones have great quality pictures!
We are lucky to be experiencing all this tech and the best is yet to come.
Awesome!
looking forward to your raw comparison!
2:42, the roof detail 😱😱😱 I’ll wait few month after the price go bit down and get Nokia
Its a limited premium phone, i heard it ll be off sale in jule or june (not sure).
did you get one?
Oh my god see The details taken by #nokia
Nokia 9 Pureview 👍😄
You have done what many refused to do. To compete 9PV directly to P30P. I'm truly speechless. I was expecting P30P to wipe 9V. Even thought you had the labels mixed up. Few questions. Were this direct jpg shot or raw edited? And just to be sure,no night mode was used for the P30P? I'm amazed if this truly are 9PV native jpg output. Owe Sarvikas an apology.
I have to admit the Nokia 9 can give some really good details in daylight! The B&W sensors can add some great dynamic range.
Night and zoom are clearly a defeat for obvious reasons (sensor size, aperture and optical zoom in favor of Huawei).
The problem is Nokia 9 has still fingerprint issue and some not nice flaws. Also slow image processing. Who owns a Nokia 9 can tell us about software updates and fixes.
Why don't use night mode on P03pro??
Nokia's camera is the best in the world 🔥🔥Did you guys see that low light imaging of 9PV in the video??🔥🔥
Did you see how high you need to go on ISO and Exposure?
Colours on the Nokia 9 are strongly realistic. Above all,the outcome of any camera battle against Nokia 9 Pureview is now a foregone conclusion! No surprise here. It is PUREVIEW!
No they are not realistic at all, in most cases they are darker and oversharpenned, even the sky is going red by 9PW 1:19, so what are you talking about?
@@MikeShPr you mean to say over saturated images on your favourite smartphone is real?
@@anoopa3547 ... don't be ... a noob a.
@@MikeShPr ha ha. Good one😃
@@MikeShPr red sky?? I think you phone has problem with pixels
Wow!!!! Nokia Best!!! Very clear and natural!!!! Bokeh super!!!!
The crops from the N9 suffers a little from oversharpening. Nokia just released a firmware update dealing with this issue. Do you know if it improved the jpeg output?
What a great work!
Congrats!
Were these pictures post-processed or captured straight into jpeg and then incorporated into the video ?
Hmmm. Gotta admit I expected the Nokia 9PV not to be so close to the P30, Actually, it seemed more natural and sharper in many instances. Indeed, there is a lot of hype for the
I know there is no OIS for the N9PV, which is a bummer but the way the phone was designed it would have been impossible to produce a single picture from a collection of stabilized photos where the lenses would have slight differences of the frame they capture while they are moving because of OIS and the ever so slight movement of hands.
Kind Request : Always include your shooting modes parameters and the megapixels each phone incorporates on each shot, as well as if you are using tripods or not.
I agree completely
WOW Those colors of the Nokia look perfect! Very detailed and we'll exposed!
Sad it's oversharpened and the white balance is inconsistent...
This is the comparision I'm waiting for,because I want to buy the Nokia,seriously.😃
No doubt,the Nokia it's better in all conditions.More natural,more sharper,more realistic,and with more definition!!!and an incredible dinamic range!!!😍
Huawei only it's better in zoom,but usually,I don't use it.😏
Shut up,and take my money,Nokia!!!🤑
So come to my showroom ill give more discount
Watching this from my lumia 1020...camera what ? 😁
Lumia 1020 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Is it a real comparison or if yes then compare Nokia with Google pixel 3xl.
By the way
I am a fan of nokia camera quality
It's worth mentioning that, just like the Nokia 9, the P30 will also receives plenty of updates. The software is still not optimal, having Huawei changed to a new sensor with a uncommon color array. Takes time to perfect the algorithms.
I can agree, the RYYB arrangement can be confusing. What looks red appears to be whiteish.
Anybody knows the song?
Was a tripod used for the Nokia low light images? For such a slow shutter speed, the images appear to be stable. Also we’re the images edited post production?
I like nokia but I have to be fair.. in low light mode the iso in the nokia is always to high, thats on purpose by the fotographer to captur more light but it will capture more noise too. The post processing of the p30 its still unbeatable. Nice try Nokia.
I never do any detailed review when it comes to this kind of comaprison video. But since these two Android smartphones are currently the hot topic and I have utmost interest with these two, I would make an exception here.
1:08 I find that the 9PV have a much better colour balance than the P30P. Just look at the pavement behind that Mustang.
1:38 2:18 2:34 I can definitely can see clearer details on the 9PV.
1:50 3:29 5:28 The 9PV have cooler and sharper looking photo than the P30P. At 1:50, the P30P photo looked like as if it had applied some red or purple tint.
2.05 There seems to be no shadow inside the flower on the 9PV photo. But to be honest, I still find the P30P photo still look amazing despite the little shadow. A considerable draw here.
2:49 The sky looked different. I'm not sure which one I would have. 🤔
3:02 The colour on the P30P looked more vibrant than the 9PV.
3:50 4:17 4:31 5:55 6:08 7:52 9:22 The P30P have lower ISO than the 9PV, so that might explain the rather dimmed photo. At 5:55, notice the half circle mirror above the entrance door. At 6:08, notice the vase.
4:02 8:06 Again, the sky looked different and the 9PV looked cooler than the P30P.
4:44 Now the 9PV looked dimmer than the P30P, but I noticed that the seeds on the 9PV looked crisper.
4:59 The P30P looked more exposed, hence the obvious whiteness, but I noticed a starkling difference from the brake lights. Which one looks real? 🤔
5:14 7:24 The P30P doesn't exhibit too much exposure compared to 9PV. Might be because of its lower ISO.
5:42 I noticed a different shade of yellow here.
6:42 6:57 7:10 7:38 8:24 8:37 I'm rather amazed by the sharpness of the 9PV despite the zoom.
8:52 9:35 It seemed that the P30P have a much cleaner looking photo than the 9PV.
To sum up, both phones performs well. Difficult choice for sure, but I do definitely lean a bit towards the 9PV for its sharpness. That said, there are certain elements that the P30P do better than the 9PV.
P.S. Is it possible for you to have a shootout between the P30 Pro and the Nokia Lumia 1020?
Agree with you bro
Wow Nokia is always best but little disappointment in the zoom range but it's not a big problem because no one going to zoom and take pictures always Nokia 9 PureView then name it deserve awesome coverage thanks a lot
Well, wait! A 5X optical zoom is a great thing! If you are a bit far from the object you want to capture, for example a monument or inside a cathedral, you can get a lot of details with such a zoom. It's everything but useless. These shots of Nokia 9 are coming from RAW, I guess, because the jpg out of the box is really bad. I know because I've seen samples in RAW and jpg online, and the difference is noticeable.
I love the background music 😍
Hello, pictures taken with Nokia is it RAW? Software enhanced?
On this vid, it's pure JPEG.
For RAW, check this vid: ruclips.net/video/mxnwzc1FHHo/видео.html
The king is coming back 😱
Nokia has Zeiss lens, but Huawei has Leica, Zeiss is best Nokia is best
We want raw 😋 and manual shots
Wow! Nokia 😍😍😍😍👏👏👏👏👏🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝
Great video comparison!!
A very revealing review/comparison.
Nokia pictures postworked?
02:58 This guy is from Finland
Does anybody knows the song from background?
I think you are not turning on the night mode. Of p30 pro.
Damm Nokia is so impressive
In my opinion I think the photos taken from Nokia 9 PureView are more dimensional than Huawei P30 Pro.
Background music?
Unfinished : Indeed, there is a lot of hype for the P30 Pro.
No doubt, that the P30 Pro is a great device, with many nice features.
Competition brings advancements faster.
Still, I never would support them, for various reasons.
One of the problems is that they get the praise they deserve or a little more than that and other brands get underscores and pushed aside.
HTC and especially LG for instance, has been producing some great phones for years, namely the V20,V30,V40.
Nokia being a truly beloved brand for what they have given us, many years before anyone could deliver anything close to Nokia's offerings. Hope they will continue to innovate and the next PureView could land on my hands.
Thank you for another great video!
NPV9 3220mAh battery?
but the google's software helps nokia to manage battery way better than other phones do
If you use night mode of Huawei P30 pro under the daylight, it takes several photos to make a better image and it takes longer time to process just like the Nokia 9 PV.
Тут всем понятно!NOKIA😎
Nokia win
nokia 9 is best❤❤❤❤❤❤
A post-V4.22C update video, maybe?
NOKIA-father of all mobiles
My belief remains that it needs a competent user to bring out the best of what the device is actually capable of producing ?!
It appears quite some users 'not up to the mark' in knowing how to use it properly so they conclude it's a 'lousy' device ?!
As far as personal preference goes, i'll certainly select the Nokia 9 PV over these Huawei or Samsung or Apple or Google etc. as i consider the Nokia going the step in a fundamentally different direction with a promising prospect, of course they need to follow up with at least mitigation if not eventual elimination of the negative issues hindering it in terms of the user experience or user friendliness etc.
As far as branding goes, i have more 'traditional trust' in the Leica, Zeiss & Nokia while i have to consider the Huawei the 'odd one out' !
Through Leica, Huawei manages to come out with very competent 'camera-in-a-phone's but ultimately i still won't 'trust' Huawei on the same level as a Nokia...whether it be with 5G network or a handphone, so for more 'peace of mind' is also a great reason to settle for the Nokia.
Wait what? I thought N9P was very worse!? I wish N9P would get rid of that oversharpening caused by all the cameras cuz It looks too strong sometimes but there is definitively detail!
Based on these pictures , if the pictures are true Nokia 9 PureView beat it smoothly Huawei P30 Pro -t
Nokia 9 PureView the king
The reason the Preview got such bad press: Slow camera performance.
Yeah it takes great photos when the stars align but for day-to-day shots, it's going to lose to iPhones and Huaweis. You have to consider what type of photographer you are to make the best use of the tool at hand. Are you a burst or composed shooter?
I've recently started using my new Nokia 9PV...initial impressions overall are impressive whether in photo or video.
My comparison device is my other phone the Huawei P20Pro. The image fusion process in the 9PV (which makes this device unique form ANY other current production camera-centric smartphone ?) results in some obvious lag in overall imaging processing speed but the end results more than 'justify' the delays as far as i'm concerned ! My Huawei captures faster photos but due to the overall less 'accurate' default image i actually waste more time manually editing the initial photo to get closer to what my own eye sees & even then it does not match the 'standard' produced by the 9PV from it's default 'slow' processing ?!
Of course not every shot should be that satisfying but nevertheless all my initial positive impressions from my own 9PV experiences indicates to me the 9PV is in a different league of camera phone...which may never see another brand trying to produce a similar product due to the departure by the Light company away from smartphone imaging etc.
Those 'experts' who keep harping on the relatively slow imaging processing speed of the Nokia 9PV are to me like those people blindly complaining of the slow recharging times of EV's versus petrol or diesel fossil vehicles i.e. take too slow to get filled up yet range is still shorter etc. i.e. they trying some apple to orange practically irrelevant comparision ?! Fundamentally different design concepts each have their respective pros & cons so superficial comparisons does NOT mean much ?! As such the Nokia 9PV should be compared to another camera-centric smartphone also with image fusion technology (if any exists around that is) THEN only can conclude if it's relatively faster or slower...otherwise in the meantime, the Nokia 9PV is in a unique class of it's own 'above' (not 'below') in terms of the quality standard of it's imaging output resulting from it's unique method of processing & production !!
When it comes to video, from my usage of my 9PV as vehicle camcorder to record my road trip videos, i notice the quality of detailing, sharpness overall (whether day or nite) is comparable if not better than my Huawei-Leica device. Low light noise management is far superior than on say the Nokia 8 or 7+ devices, is at least on par with my Huawei device.
Bottomline for me is the capability to capture photo/video which 'accurately' reflects what my own eyes see i.e. accurate colour, exposure etc. reproduction in which case the 9PV tends to produce better colour accuracy with as good if not better exposure & sharpness than my Huawei P20Pro..done with overall similar levels of 'smoothness' performance in the execution of the video playback.
Also, so far it appears to me the default Nokia-Zeiss camera app with the 9PV seem less competent in video capture than the Opencam app in that the Opencam app results in more uniformly distributed sharpness resulting in not only better detailing but also more accurate exposure reproduction & management ? As if it appears like the Nokia-Zeiss uses say only 1 camera to take videos while the opencam uses all 5 cameras ?! Whatever the reality behind it, the results of my (still very prelimilary) videos seem to suggest to me i get better videos using Opencam instead of the default Nokia-Zeiss app, with the only advantage of the default app is in the superior audio capture quality using all mics while the 3rd party apps like Opencam use only 2 of the mics ?!? The audio quality when using Ozo audio capable device (which 9PV is) with 3rd party apps like Opencam also (finally) have improved in that those annoying audio distortions (which i experienced with my Nokia 8 & 7+) appear now gone in the 9PV...at least now the audio is basically 'hearable' although of course overall inferior compared to if recorded using Ozo spatial effect of the original Nokia-Zeiss camera app.
Overall still 'early' into my 'exploration journey' into my Nokia 9 PV yet the experience so far tells me this is indeed a basically 'different' class of device with much un-explored untapped potential waiting to be discovered & put to practical use !
lol. you are comparing a DRAGON = NOKIA to an ANT 😅
This is contrary to what all the reviewers are saying. Something is fishy.
I don't want to sound too cautious, but if the Nokia 9 images comes from RAW and not directly from jpgs, then there's a clear difference. The jpgs out of the box are bad, if they didn't fix them. I've checked an online review with both RAW and jpgs and the difference is clear.
Huawei: pushing mobile photography.
Nokia: Let's just put more camera in.
Nokia best
Nokia did great job
Want p30pro hdr photo vs nokia9
nokia have better camera
Thank you. Wonderful photos. You did a great job. Nokia 9 PureView is much better.
Yeah! Nokia has great image quality, but... in low light condition it should be better and it's not. What's more, Nokia 9 has a lot of lens but there is no ultra-wide or 2x zoom. We have got 5 lens that provide only quality without any extras. I think we should expect more. For example Pixel 3 has only one len, but it provides also great image quality, lowlight mode (NighSide), awesome image stabilization and SuperZoom thanks to its software.
I think nokia 9 pureview much better
in DayLight HDR & Sharpness & Bookeh Mode :- Clearly Nokia 9PV win
& other stuff P30P win
thats all my opinion .............
& Nokia Shots feels like Naturals colour .
W0w I like the Nokia better overall, and p30 ever so slightly in night shots.
I am thinking most reviewers just set it to apple google samsung style automode and picks which one looks best after a few shots and forget it and call it a reviewk, without going any deeper in to the manual modes and post processing.
nokia 9
Was disappointed but hopefully pure10 can now take picture at night with moving hand.
Great video !
The Nokia gets my vote. Nice job on this video.
Nokia more realistic
Yesterday I was using Nokia 9 and it is just disgusting at making photos, only 1 of 10 made photos is so so, others are just trash, unfocused unnatural colors so unnatural that human faces are red pumpkins, lol, it is not cameraphone it is just another beta version of lightcamera. And I know what you would say, and the answer is, yes it has the last April's firmware V4.22C that fixed many camera bugs, but it still has so much to fix that I can't call it more than a beta device.
There is something wrong with your p30 pro. It does not have the ultra widw angle lens nor the night mode.. You must replace it ;)
Its kind of cheat because nokia 9 does not have night mode. Auto and auto comparison is fairer
Name itself describe the camera,, nokia 9 pureview 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Son Huawei _ my camera is best
Dad Nokia- i am your dad , dear son
•••once again nokia, Congratulations to you.
We all remember Lumia 1020 ?...I still have mine with it's 41megal pixels, am glad they are back and hope to get my nokia9pv soon.
Next time you should include video quality. Just saying.
4:21
Nokia is the best
what are saying Bro!!!!!p30 is a disappointment. ...it's in top of dxo mark ....99% you tubers has gave it the crown of camera sensation of the year...it has 50xxxxxxxxxxxxxx zoom by which you can zoom upto your soul...it can take the picture in pitch black so that u can see inside of a black hole...(its an irony vin diesel did not have it at that time ..if he had he might be able to save his girl friend) .................. what are u saying ?? u may lose your job by saying it....
I'm not so sure about taking pictures in pitch black. Check the video back at lowlight, and analyze it carefully.
Liked your sarcasm. Dxomark is shit. But p30 pro deserves to sit at the top spot amongst the phones they reviewed. Atleast they are innovating unlike Samsung and Apple. Nokia 9 gives it a tough fight and even outshines it in some scenarios at near 60% price point
Those who trust dxomark are noob . Dxomark only promoted smartphone or camera company who paid them . Those who didnt pay to dxomark would get scores which is even worse than iphone 6. For example nokia 8 who is excellent than iphone 6 but still get lower mark than iphone 6 which is clearly beaten by the mighty lumia 1020. Sony also shares the same fate as the noki smartphone because they didnt paid or bribe dxomark.
Dxo mark test is just numbers, better compare the photos.
Nokia best camera
Nokia 9 Pure view is the clear winner in All aspects.
Camera is better in terms of details in 9Pureview when compared to P30pro.
SD845 of Nokia 9pureview is almost similar flagship processor (but slightly older) like Huawei's Kirin 980.
Nokia having pure Android One platform. So it's better than Huawei's EMUI.
One more very important thing, Nokia 9Pureview is Rs.20000/- cheaper than Huawei P30pro.
So, Nokia 9Pureview is the clear winner here.
i prefer a versatile camera in phone so naturally, id go for p30 pro.
Nokia is always a winner in camera picture quality with crisp, realistic color output . But crazy people run behind cheap Chinese products 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
nokia 9 is better
Nokia is king
I hope Nokia and at least one third party continue to advance the software for the five lenses.
Nokia in Day is good but low light is bad.
This compression is nothing but a joke. Obviously, p30p has a better dynamic range and better colors. And the pictures took by Nokia at nite remind me of phones ten years ago. I have to say there is some tiny parts that Nokia may do a better job, but based on this youtubers whole video with biases, I have to say, Nokia 9 pureview is trash
P30P has better colour? Sorry, not convinced by that.
Farhan Ahmad Tajuddin yea, I understand, some people are just selectively blind, it’s ok
Why don't you check out the same comparison as above but with RAW photo. I totally would leave the P30 Pro behind.
ruclips.net/video/mxnwzc1FHHo/видео.html
Omg Nokia wins this one. Day to day normal lighting the Nokia gives great colors and detail is way better than p30pro. Also 2x zoom was so good on Nokia than on p30pro, however the 5x zoom was better on p30pro. P30pro bit better in low light. Portraits no competition Nokia did much better. Nokia also deserves credit for this camera. Huawei p30pro can great on zoom and Huawei didn’t have to lie about the moon mode, they show that if you a liar you remain a liar, it’s not the first time