Watch Live: WI v. Darrell Brooks - Waukesha Parade Defendant Trial Day Three
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 окт 2022
- STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Today Mr.Brooks objected 99 times, said “grounds” 112 times, and asked if something was “fair to say” 117 times
Are you sure….those numbers seem kind of low 😂
😂😂😂
He also spent a total of 73 minutes shuffling papers before asking “do you recall where you was persitioned at”
@@bretthatesgirlsify😂😂😂
We should change laws to allow victims to enact punishment to all those who are found guilty.
(State) Was Mr Brooks driving? (Def) I don’t consent to that name, nor do I know anyone by that name. (Judge) Mr Brooks do u have any questions? Yes ur honor 😂 classic
😂
Walked right into that, multiple times 🤡🤡🤡
😂every single time
@@lolacookie453 And continues to as well, wouldn't that be fair to say.
😂😂😂
This mofo apologized to the court for his behavior one day and then proceeded to act just as bad, or worse, for the remainder of the trial! 🤦🏾♀️
Yes because he wasn’t raised that way. Don’t you understand that? He’s a God fearing man
@Materialgirl_3 what you said!!
@@Materialgirl_3You saw that Bible he carried with him every day. Remember what he said to Judge Dorow, " It's not A Book it's THE book"..."But how many people live by it though" 🤯🫣🤷🏾
She let him get away with a lot
He doesn’t know what hearsay is.
PROSECUTION ASKING THE OFFICER: “After the vehicle ran over a bunch of people, did the driver stop and check on the people?” DARRELL BROOKS: “Irrelevant.” Wow, what a cold hearted individual.
Or when he says irrelevant when parents are answering questions about their injured children…as if they don’t matter.
He basically proved the states entire case for all of the hit and run charges. And that was his fastest objection because he opened the door to that question by asking about break lights and realized how much he’d messed up.
Sociopaths are like that
Diz dat duh doodishil determination
I’m glad he’s rotting in prison, I’m just sorry the taxpayers he’s already cost so much, have to feed him the next forty years.
This guy is in his glory and is living for this right now. He’s brought out of his cell, he’s at the center of everybody’s attention, and all those people whose lives he changed forever are being brought in for him to “examine” at his pleasure… Each day, for hours, people whose legal educations span years or decades tailor their knowledge to be as responsive as possible to his legal gibberish. Eventually though when this circus ends, his ego is going to collapse as he realizes that whether he agrees or not, he’s inmate Brooks who’s never going out free into the world again. His lack of remorse and basic human decency when interacting with his victims are absolutely chilling.
Well said! He's frightening.
I live for that moment!
Yep. But when is it's all over, those cell doors close and he's rotting in prison.
YES👌👍👏👏👏👏🤸♀️🤸♀️🤸♀️.
He feels like he is somehow above those who’s lives he desecrated. He is earning his place in incarceration for the rest of his life wasting yet more of taxpayers money. He is a Pathetic Human.
Has anyone else noticed that he seems to be intimidating towards women but keeps his questions short when a man is on the stand. He likes to intimidate women but is afraid of men.
Yes! And he seems to think if he honked his horn, he was allowed to hit pedestrians. He didn't have to stop. But he abided by flimsy barricades.
If I had a catastrophic brake failure, and I had to choose striking pedestrians or a barricade, I'd choose a barricade. I'd find an off ramp.
If you've ever encountered a person on a crime spree, I anticipate and suspect it's bad decisions compounding. Like being strapped to a comet.
I noticed this too! He seems intimidated by males and kind of talks down to females
@@montecarlo5329 even the way he stares down the judge...
Yes, funny there are a lot of intimidating men in prison!!
When he demandingly growls out the word “grounds!” My blood pressure rises. Especially since the objection is always immediately followed by the actual grounds for it! 😡😡😡😡
Yep he doesn't even let them really finish saying objection, let alone the grounds before he says it. So frustrating!
Grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds grounds
@@TristenJen then he growls "grounds" at the judge, as if she has to give him grounds for her ruling. This guy is a clown and I'm enjoying watching him bury himself
I know and here he cuts them.off and don't give them time to even state their objection.. he is so rude and crude
I know why didn't the judge tell him to stop saying that and interrupting
“Yes you have shaved your head.”
Officer Schneider is freaking awesome.
She was great, I loved her answers!
She was wonderful. Every answer was so carefully crafted to prove to the jury she knew EXACTLY who the driver was and what he had done. It was remarkable.
Loved Officer Schneider!!! She was fantastic!
She’s also gorgeous
I feel so sorry for the victims and their families having to have the POS talk down to them and acting like its them on trial and not him. Absolutely disgusting!
I agree. I hope the jurors give him what he deserves, life imprisonment if not the death penalty.
Couldn't agree more
How can he look them in the eyes? This is so sad.
Well he’s not fit for our society. What do you expect?
At least they won’t have to sit through multiple appeals, from the death penalty. 😢 Thats all I can find to comfort myself, and maybe them. I’m sure he will try to be “famous” so the families can take every dime he makes. He’s truly disgusting.
The lady prosecutor with the dark hair has had it with this POS. The gloves are off, but at the same time she is aware to be careful because the defendant is trying for a mistrial.
I agree. She looks like she isn't playing.
Prosecution is doing a fantastic job of allowing the Mr. B to convict himself by allowing him to bring up statements and evidence they did not under examination. The judge is also walking a thin line! I believe her patience and judiciary experience are being tested all day, everyday in this trial. The Prosecution and Judge are doing their jobs under the law!! It's about time we see more of this!!!
Yep, she is having to force a smile but that she is doing it while handing him rope is probably helping.
Agreed. I'm replying to this almost 2 weeks later and she finally makes a statement regarding it and how the comments he makes. She is the district of attorney so I'm sure she knows that she has to remain professional. I made this comment on another video but usually at the sentencing the victims and families get to make victim impact statements and that is going to be very interesting to watch and I hope they speak down to him and make him feel horrible and the good thing is he can't speak back. I believe this gets to happen at any sentencing trials that has victims but I am not sure, I guess we will see unless anyone knows for sure?
for a "sovereign citizen" he sure depends a lot on the US constitution to protect him
Typical Sov Cit BS...they want all the protections and perks that come with being a citizen protected under the constitution, but none of the duties, responsibilities or laws that come with being a citizen protected under the constitution.
Its annoying me that everytime the state says “objection…” he immediately says “GROUNDS, GROUNDS” and doesnt even let them finish their objection
He is such a little boy.
Ughhhh right??? He started that on day 2 and continued allllll the way through and it made me sooo frustrated each and every time he said it
He’s doing it on purpose…to annoy the Judge, the Prosecution, and to manipulate the Jury into thinking he’s distinguished!! He’s stroking his own narcissistic ego!! There’s no rule in Court that says you can’t yell “GROUNDS” during or after an objection. This is entertainment to him!! He’s simply having a great time at everyone else’s expense…especially the victims and the witnesses!! 😮
OR when it's overruled he will say grounds are times..WTH? Grounds are
b/c it's proper
My favorite part is always when he says “I haven’t had time to go through it all.” Like…you’re in jail….how do you not have an abundance of time?
It would be more fair to say (haha) "why haven't you taken this time to prepare yourself" since he tried to ask the lady officer that, but over and over complains that he can't do paperwork fast enough, read paperwork quickly enough, has sooooo much paperwork in front of him and loses it, or also cannot understand basic English like the word "divert" ......
He was only given access to the evidence a few days before the trial started.
@@SugarBunny119 yeah but that’s his fault he decided get rid of his attorneys who had been with him the whole case until like a week before trial. Like maybe he should have thought about that and I don’t think he has a right to complain
@@SugarBunny119 he fired his attorney. Firing your attorney does not give you the right to delay proceedings due to you being unprepared. He had ample time to fire his attorney before the trial.
@@SugarBunny119 is that you Darrell Brooks?
Poor lady in red is shaking from being so anxious being questioned by someone who could have almost killed her and ruined her ability to live a better life physically. Disgusting
Gosh I saw that I feel so much for her and everyone who has to endure this douches questions. At least he's starting to speed up his cross a bit.
I know, I saw that, too! It was really disturbing and sad how anxious his bogus questioning made her.
I thought she should have answered, "No, I didn't catch your license plate. You literally had just run me over in your SUV. It would be more than fair to say that I was in shock."
My heart broke for her. Then I was infuriated when he faked being teary eyed at the end of her testimony!
Ikr! I hope she can heal now, emotionally, knowing he will never again be able to hurt anyone else.
My heart breaks for her and all the families and survivors ❤❤❤
He knows by now that yelling GROUNDS does not benefit or gain him anything (he never presses for further explanation), so the only reason he does it is to be disruptive and disrespectful and to taunt the prosecution. Luckily this is only hurting his reputation and credibility with the jury.
Absolutely. Extremely obnoxious, the same way a toddler yells out, "Nuh-uuhh!!!!"
@@DaniHGirl 😂😂
It blows my mind that even though he's been through the criminal court process numerous times, he doesn't even possess the very basic knowledge of how proceedings work. When the prosecuting team objects & gives their reason ie relevance, argumentative, compound question, THAT reason is the grounds. The only time the prosecutors don't immediately state their grounds is when it comes to Brooks' questions regarding jurisdiction, nonsense about plaintiff, etc. The prosecutors typically don't list their grounds is bc the judge ruled that type of questioning or discussing is off limits. He continuously & erroneously throws out grounds as if that applies to the judge bc he actually thinks the judge has to justify & explain her rulings. She does not nor does any other judge. Their ruling on an objection is final.
Many times, he’s demanding “grounds” WHILE they’re giving them to him 🙄
LMAO his argument at 3:04:07 is hilarious. Hilariously bad. “Would it be fair to say you have not seen the alleged defendant shave his head?”
“I have not witnessed him actively shaving his head.”
LMAO. There’s no way he thinks this is a legit argument
😂 I loved the witness and his responses
I'm just now watching this and her facial expressions had me laughing so hard. Seriously, dude?!
“Do you know what that crash was?” Witness: “the vehicle hitting the band”. Way to go to ensure you point out your own evilness. What a genius. 🙄
Self-fulfilling prophecy!!!!❤
That dear father held his arms in a way to keep himself beating the crap out of this sick sadist …. My heart out to that dear father and kids
he did an amazing job keeping it together, my heart goes out to him and his family
I started a drinking game to take a shot everytime he says "grounds" and I'm just now getting out of the hospital for alcohol poisoning.
Equal effect if you drink a shot every time he says "fair to say" 😂
Shouting “Grounds” continuously is so embarrassing! Just everything. I’m so sorry to the victims and this community. You deserve more dignity for your pain 😞.
Right, he thinks he sounds so smart. It’s embarrassing. He thinks he has the judge in the palm of his hand.
Especially when he does it literally right after the prosecution specifies the objection, or interrupts them as they’re trying to specify… just makes him look like he doesn’t know what the word means. Which is certainly consistent with his other behavior, like labeling everything as hearsay for some reason.
You’re so right about that. As the trial goes on, he yells “Grounds!” so hatefully. The prosecution can clearly state the reason (aka the grounds for the objection) and he will still yell out “Grounds!” He also obviously doesn’t know what hearsay is. He just shows his ignorance when claiming hearsay to the objection. Brooks is just a vile and disgusting piece of garbage. They way he treats the witnesses, especially if they’re women, is just revolting.
I strongly believe 90% of the time he objected to the prosecution’s questioning was for retaliation only.
A d half the time he is saying when the prosecution is literally stating the grounds
First, he’s hard of hearing but then brings attention to audio that no one else hears 😩, AND THEN, he doesn’t consent to being called Mr. Brooks but in the next breath, answers to it… sad, yet entertaining! 😩
The audacity of this terrible human being is unbelievable. I’m sorry for the victim and their families.
You mean SUB human being!!👹
THAT defendant sitting there is a MONSTER, not a human being
It’s terrible. And he gets to question the victims and witnesses. It must be so traumatic for them.
Human being? Really?
They always say that they're gonna get thirst but I think this time he will get his usually it doesn't happen and I'm not a believer but this time I think you'll get his! Thank God
For someone who was so well brought up as a good Christian, he never says please or thank you.
some of his lesser faults.
OMG!!! LMAO!! Dang!! Officer Schneider gave this dog a run for his money! Calm, cool, collected! She was SO professional and NOT backing down to Brooks shenanigans! She NEVER wavered! Way to go young lady! You’re a HERO to many!
The “plaintiff” routine he does with each witness is driving me mad. Well done to all of the witnesses for keeping their composure whilst being questioned by him
i thought i was the only one who was feeling like that!
'Grounds!' He took hold of this word like a pit bull and his toy!!
Oh man, I liked it when the detective was actually answering. I wish someone would’ve been like, “Yes, I interact with the plaintiff every year when it takes my taxes,” lol.
@@marisa4545 Absolutely maddening when he says grounds. He likes heresy as well, but hasn’t figured out what it actually means.
@@daCubanaqt it’s just hilarious to me if I was on the stand it wouldnt be hard to hold in my facial expressions or laughter
I would forever grateful if I was erika. He’s facing 6 murder charges and he’s worried about this DV charge. He’s obsessed.
DB yells out “grounds” like this is a BINGO game.
😂😂😂
Wait just a minute…. Did he seriously just apologise for his behaviour in court “because his mother didn’t raise him like that” ???? Does he not see the irony in what he just said?!?! Soooo she didn’t raise him to be disrespectful BUT running people over with his car and injuring/killing them is completely fine and not worth apologising or taking responsibility for?!?! Oh this guy is the epitome of a narcissist if I ever seen one. The joy he gets out of this, is sickening and extremely hard to watch!
100% his mom screamed at him over the phone for acting a fool in court
You should watch how she acts in her interview from a few weeks ago…. You can tell why he ended up this way. He’s her “angel” and he’s not a “demon” complete denial, clearly never told him no.
@@JamezGrimm I thought the same thing!! She clearly never told him to shut up, case closed either!
@@JamezGrimm exactly. She called him a caged bird, ref Maya A. poem.
@@JamezGrimm He’s definitely a byproduct of his upbringing. Mommy’s little angel. It’s sick how most parents of narcissists continue to coddle their adult children after the do horrific things to others. Then there’s the parents who are also narcissists themselves. My father was an abusive narcissist and so was my grandmother. No matter what awful things he did and how many people he hurt, she was always there to bail him out and make excuses for him because she didn’t want her own life to be inconvenienced in any way. I’m beyond thankful that God gave me an incredible mother who ensured that I understood that actions have consequences and raised me right. One of my first words was actually “consequence” lol. Never once did she make excuses for me, and I understood that I was to respect her rules, not just out of respect to her, but also out of respect to myself.
Proper and consistent discipline is so extremely important for a child’s healthy development. If children don’t learn that their bad actions have consequences as early as possible, this is the kind of outcome you get. Brooks’ mother created a monster, and continues to encourage his behavior by pandering to him and continuing to make him feel like he has more worth and is more special than anyone else. He doesn’t think he can do any wrong because that’s what his upbringing taught him. I won’t, and don’t, blame his mother for the lives he took, as that was his choice and his alone, but she absolutely was a vital part of him ending up in his position. The fact that people like her and people like my grandmother can keep making excuses for their adult abusive narcissist child’s abhorrent behavior is beyond my comprehension.
I LOVED when this judge took a little slight jab at Brook’s one day in reference to his mother testifying, saying she knew his mother would “OBEY” him if he wanted her to be there, based off of his prior remarks in regards to his mother doing whatever he wanted her to do. I don’t think Brooks even caught it, which made it even better lol
He thinks these “gotcha” questions where someone doesn’t remember verbatim what they said in a report a year ago is somehow going to buy him an acquittal.
Not to mention most of these reports are summaries of what the people said and were not written by the person themselves.
Some of the questions were written by attorneys, but they weren't finished.
The audacity for him to ask the one man why he didn’t stop to help anyone. Why didn’t you just STOP Darrell???
It's a shame the witness couldn't respond and ask him why HE didn't stop and try and help the injured..he's a disgusting human being well psychopath..
Rewatching this trial for the 3rd time. It’s such a unique trial for the worst reasons. The victims are many and I hope they find healing. The defendants behavior, long before he committed murder, and during his trial are despicable and he deserves no other notoriety or response.
I am rewatching it for the second time. The difference at this point is that I have read and listened to people / videos / books explaining the sovereign citizen ideology. I had listened to the expression "I accept for value and return for value" several times, but I didn't have any idea of what lies behind it, the meaning of it all. So sovereign citizens don't pay taxes and write this to "force" the government to take the money from the straw-person account, where there is a million dollars for every single baby who is born in the USA. I knew that sovereign citizens opposed to have their names styled all in capitals, but I didn't know about the thought (or the non-thought, the conspiracy theory in any case) behind that. Having a better grasp about these issues makes me recognise what he is saying better.
Yet it still all makes no sense ... I rest easily knowing he is prison for the rest of his life. I sent to MURDERER a letter that I sign and enclosed a penny with the statement hope this half cent helps you because the victims get the other half. It was returned to me. He refused it. LMAO
@@LisaSimpsonRules I’m not sure if you’ll see this, but I am rewatching this now. what does the “I accept for value in return for value” mean? Or is there a video you recommend I search and watch to learn what these wacky things he says mean? It drives me insane all the stuff he says, but I don’t even understand what the heck it means. Mostly that one and his goofy statement at the start of each day. These people are insane!(sovereigns)
@@curtconn8149 Because he has dignity, LOL! But I thought that it was forbidden to send any quantity of money to jail inmates, no matter how big or small.
@@MissyMay925 Matt Orchard - The Darrell Brooks Show. Check it out (hopefully youtube won't censor this message as it did with all the old messages)
Darrell Brooks is the best help for the prosecution! With his grilling of questions to the victims, he's getting the witnesses to say more than they ever said for the prosecution. He's burying himself, which is needed.
I think under different circumstances, DB could have been a good prosecutor since he prosecuted the heck out of this case!
@@calinasagilitypartner4444 I agree!! It’s just too bad that he chose darkness over light!! ❤
Just watching his questioning of the detective at the start & that was hilariously bad. The detective’s first answers were brutally clear “when you drove past me into the parade full of people?”
My favorite part so far, outside of him wearing the objection sign. Loser
who's you? pos look in the mirror and fake cry
someone please do society a favor in jail
That was THE BEST
That guy was a champ! Stayed in control the whole time 🏆
The highlight of the day, the female officer admits she did not witness the defendant shave his head. The look on her face sums up her feelings about Brooks
(I am here as a third-party intervener in this matter) 3:29 video begins. 2:11:48 they are back from mid-morning break. 4:12:06 back from lunch and video begins, apparently late, with some proceedings already occurring. 6:19:40 audio resumes after afternoon break, 6:19:53 video resumes (behind the scenes interactions between various Court staff) somebody notices and they cut audio and video. 6:22:43 video and audio are back again with more behind the scenes routine interaction. 6:23:52 they are back on the record. -Mr Brooks- asks to address subject matter jurisdiction and if that's a determination. It doesn't work. He's still on trial. Everybody stands around until 6:25:59 when the jury is seated. (The judge then asks -Mr Brooks- if he has questions and he answers to that name, without objection, and says that he does. Quite confusing). On with the trial.
Lord's work.
Thank you!
THANK YOU
MVP right here. Thank you!!
You crossing out Mr. Brooks in the description is the laugh I needed listening to this ignorant donkey.
I think this judge is amazing..Her patience, and the fairness (even tho the guy probably doesn't deserve it) has been beyond any thing I've seen. I especially like that she is noting every single detail, making it almost impossible for a mistrial. Absolutely one of the best judges I've witnessed.
I completely agree. No matter what Brooks might be thinking about the judge being kind and helpful, she is NOT going to be outsmarted by a nincompoop.
@@Sam.OO7 yes!
agree 100%. this is NOT for the faint of heart. she has been fantastic, especially under the circumstances!
She is very smart she knows what to do from the beginning to make sure they will do this trail and finally they will rid off him and his evil face for rest of his life behind the cage! So well done judge amazing patient 🙏🏻
Whole heartedly agree, and it was incredibly frustrating to see in the live chat people stating she’s flirtatious, having a crush on him, she should be removed from the bench etc. Are people really that ignorant 😩🤦🏼♀️😭
It’s mind blowing that he truly thinks cuz he shaved his head no one would recognize him 🤯🤬🤦♀️
I know, I was thinking about that. After he said that to the lady officer, I thought, wouldn't it be funny if after that break literally everyone came back with a shaved head 😂 just to personally attack that example of his?
And that they NOW know his name but didn’t then so how were they able to identify him? I just don’t understand this dudes line of thinking at all. Glad it’s over though. All that’s waiting is the “life + 895 years without parole to be served consecutively”
@@brie9960 i see I’m not the only one going back to the first days of this fiasco
Possible he had lice and had to shave it
did he say that's why he shaved it? he could have shaved it to look more presentable in court.
I love miss Schneider’s attitude towards him,she’s a no bullsh** kinda officer
If he doesn't know who Darrell Brooks is, then who is he representing as the 3rd party intervener?
Also, by saying Dawn Woods is his mother he IS admitting that he is DARRELL BROOKS 😅
Don't think he actually knows himself..😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Mags7760I agree 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.
He also didn’t like the word “defendant.”
While he seems to have adopted the strategy of just objecting to everything. while it is annoying, I find pleasure in knowing that every single time he objects the jury hates him just a little bit more.
Absolutely! And what’s even better, he’s guaranteeing his convictions are affirmed on appeal. Every appellate court is going to review portions of the transcript & quickly stamp “Affirmed”, without comment. Which will drive him absolutely insane.
@@maryb6672 I have never had this much anger toward a complete stranger. I do not have words to describe how disgusting I find this individual. He is bullying victims asking questions that do not matter, yelling “grounds” I wanted to grab the dance teacher and hug her. I just keep saying he is digging his grave.
We hope at least 😅
@@lisahunt9391 Your reaction is a perfectly normal & healthy response. Think of it this way, you, as a stranger with no connection whatsoever to this trial & these victims, have an abundance of empathy for what these families, children & individuals went through. Whereas, the indiv that is responsible for not only the deaths, but a lifetime of trauma & healing for those fortunate to still be alive, feels nothing. Many moons ago, when I was in college, I had a bumper sticker on my car that I think is an appropriate quote here-“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention”.
@@lisahunt9391 I’m with you 100%. It’s irritating that he just shouts “GROUNDS” whenever the state objects without giving them an opportunity to state their grounds. He’s trying to be so chauvinistic and I think the fact that the judge gave him props for representing himself and the FEW, and I do mean FEW times she sustained his objections has gone straight to his head and he’s convinced he’s actually a lawyer.
And I’m only on day 3 of the trial but it’s become apparent to me that he’s trying to make him seem like charges should not have been brought against him and this trail shouldn’t even be taken place because “an entity” can’t be a plaintiff in a trial🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
Judge: "Mr. Brooks, your single digit IQ is noted and has been entered into the record."
Brooks: OBJECTION! I do not consent to an IQ, I don't have an IQ, I've never had an IQ!
No Mr about it, gives Mr a bad name.
"jection, hearsay!"
Grounz
Grounds!
The bailiff is thinking that his hands could completely encircle Brooks' neck.
Brooks: “I don’t consent to that name.”
Judge: “Mr. Brooks”
Brooks: “yes”
😂😂😂
Why does he keep saying that? It’s been driving me crazy. Like that’s his name.
The witnesses are real heroes. I cannot imagine how hard it is answering the questions of this POS calmly and directly. There is absolutely no remorse in his face while going through the videos. A Death sentence should apply to these cases.
Wisconsin hasn't had the death penalty for nearly two-hundred years.
The witnesses are truly amazing. The band leader was great. I wanted her to talk about how she would’ve heard the horn over the noise because of her tuned ear and I’m so happy she offered up that testimony. I feel for all the victims and witnesses in this case. Absolutely horrifying incident 😭
To face the person responsible for you pain and suffering while he tries to discredit your testimony is pure evil
And should never have been allowed.
I hate him so much
He’s extremely sick and twisted
@@cattycorner8except he has the constitutional right to do so. He absolutely has the right to defend himself and face his accuser. Every person has this right regardless of how you feel about it.
True and he tries to intimidate and confuse and he tries to look oh so smart..when he's the dumbest in there and the way he barks GROUNDS..he is pathetic and a very unhappy narcissist
It’s kinda my favorite when he says good morning or good afternoon to the witnesses and they punk him out and don’t say it back. Every time it happens I get a little smile on my face.
😏me too🤭
It’s a delicious little nugget of pettiness and I’m living for it
Same 😂
Same here 😂😂😂
The way he says “GROUNDS” after every objection is killing me 🤣🤣🤣
And while they are literally saying what the grounds are !! He just yells over them .
Top reasons a person honks their horn
1. Alert another driver or pedestrians
2. Road Rage
More simply: ANGER!
3. Fun
If they see someone they know 😊
So, Brooks honked his horn to warn people to get out of the way? That's like an armed gunman shouting, "I GOT A GUN!" as he strides into a crowded room, shooting.
I don't see how he thinks that's going to help him. As a prosecutor I would argue in my closing that if he insists he was honking the horn, then clearly he was aware that he was somewhere he shouldn't have been and was hitting people. He never even tried to get off the route by turning down one of the side streets.
"If you dont get out of the way, you're consenting to getting hit by my car!"
Geez! Miss Opper is right about Brooks' questions. They're absolutely ridiculous and such a waste of time. His questions NEVER help out his case. They just reveal his stupidity.
The smirk on Casey's face when Brooks says... would it be fair to say that you operate a motor vehicle every day? Priceless 😂
I know, l don't think a lot of people picked up on that but l was roaring 🤣🤣
😅😅😅😅 a complete jack***s!
hilaaaaarious now that you pointed it out!
😂😂😂
Wow. Not one question he asks is helping him in anyway whatsoever. He has ZERO remorse.
He is a narcissistic sociopath who loves being the center of attention. I think he loved hearing the autopsy reports of the deceased.
@@justmyopinion87 Because even the people who were struck by him with his SUV identified him as the person who hit them and/or ran over them.
And zero self-awareness.
He did a GREAT job of prosecuting himself!
The way this dude instantly yells out "grounds" like a child yelling "not it! not it!" every time there is an objection is something else.
If anyone has a guess for why he is doing this, I would like to hear it. I understand knowing the grounds of an objection, but doesn't seem like he is going about it in an effective way. From my limited understanding of court procedures, it seems to me that he repeatedly says grounds while the prosecution is trying to explain the purpose of their objection.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
GGROUNDS!??!!
Yes it makes me sick!
He seen a new episode of Law & Order, or maybe an old Matlock re-run.
Can’t wait to hear tomorrow’s word.😂
The nerve of him questioning the witness about him rendering aid! He plowed through killed 6, injured 61. That witness did amazing under pressure. He seems like a genuine standup citizen. Sorry to him, his family, everyone at the parade and those who lost loved ones 🙏🏽 Rest assured he’ll never be able to do this to anyone else. Lock him up for life & toss the keys.
It's his right to defend himself and face his accuser.
@@lisamcclendon2720 Comprehension is hard to come by these days. He has the right to defend himself however he had the gall to ask witnesses about rendering aid after HE (now a convicted murderer & sentenced) killed men, women & a child. Get a grip. 🙄
“Objection. I do not consent to being called he.” wait so Darrell brooks is trans now?? 😂
😂😂😂
I believe he now goes by “they” & “them” in prison!!😅
Always was.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
The first woman to testify that was struck spoke so bravely. I am so proud of her!!
I was just thinking this. She was clearly having a hard time and powered through! I wish her well ❤
God bless all the victims!
she was amazing and once again, he was throwing fits because the judge allowed this to happen in his commentary. Any other judge would have cut that off. She’s always asking questions and intercepting today because he apologized. It’s unacceptable. This joking matter he’s having with the judge going both ways.
She was so close to tears, and that scumbag Brooks was making it worse by talking down to her!
@@stacyhunt4783judge did everything possible to prevent a mistrial accusation from being found, and it worked. It sucked but in the end he got sentenced to 1000 years and will NEVER get out thanks to her, the prosecutors, the brave victims, and DB himself. Justice was served in a perfect form
OBJECTION YOUR HONOR I DON’T WANT THE VIDEOS PLAYED BECAUSE IT SHOWS ME KILLING PEOPLE AND SEVERELY INJURING A LOT MORE. I DON’T WANT ANYONE WATCHING IT. ITS IRRELEVANT ANYWAY.
Him giggling so many times on this day is completely inappropriate. There's no way he will ever truly feel any remorse and/or acceptance of responsibility. There is no potential for rehabilitation. He is ONLY a danger to the public and needs to be locked up for good.
Yes Mr Brooks, that's EXACTLY the way your mother brought you up.
Exactly
DARRELL HAS FOUND A NEW WORD, "GROUNDS"
I came here to make the same exact comment!! 😂
grouns
😂😂
Tomorrow's new word is "speculation" and is brought to you by Sesame Street.
But he still doesn’t understand the meaning of “hearsay” 🙄 I bet the judge & prosecution really feel like explaining it to him but don’t want to because then he might actually learn some effective objection grounds.
I like how the officers direct their answers to the jury instead of him. They know that really bothered him lol
That is what they are supposed to do. He eventually figures that out
I wish ALL of the witnesses and officers did that because it really did drive him crazy. The one thing narcissists absolutely hate is being ignored or being dismissed. By the witnesses and officers directing their answers to the jury, he knew he was being ignored or dismissed. I know that’s petty of me, but I don’t care. He doesn’t deserve any recognition, nor any sympathy of being ignored or dismissed.
@@janicewingfield5245 yes. It's actually what you're supposed to do in court, as well, and what police court training is (notice almost every officer in the trial consistently turns to the jury to answer). It was great to watch how upset he got when he complained about it to one male officer (I don't remember which), who ignored him, and then the second he asked the next question, the officer turned almost facing the jury, as if to mock him just a bit.
That really got under his skin!! It hit him in his narcissistic ego and made him feel irrelevant.
Every witness should have done that.
He makes me sick. Especially the part when he questioned the witness and brought up how there were sooooo many band members and tons of people yet it’s “fair to say” not that many got hit, killed or injured. Basically he’s saying it could have been way worse so we should thank him. Delusional indeed. 😢
I got sick of that attitude as well. He seems self-heroic that he didn't plow into every single person from the start of the parade to the end.
If he wants to go that route why stop there? Wisconsin has 5.9 million other people that he in fact did not run over.
I m sure the jury were listening to every word….. so was the judge, she threw the book at him
When Darrell Edward Brooks Junior tells the court/judge “I do not consent to being called that name nor do I know anyone by that name” how does he get away with that?
It is a blatant lie to the Judge considering there’s an exhibit at his arrest, where he identifies himself as “Brooks first name Darrell”
I guess he doesn’t realize he is exposing himself as a Liar to the court claiming he doesn’t know anybody by that name..
The patience of the Judge and the prosecution is commendable… I could not tolerate his nonsense.
The best I can figure is that Brooks is experiencing a split personality whereas, while acting as his attorney, he is the attorney of Darrell Brooks Jr. and therefore not Darrell Brooks Jr. He claimed he was a "third party interlocutor" as he repeatedly referred to himself. Just more legal jargon he read somewhere. For his appeal, he's going with having legal representation, if he's even granted one.
What do you mean how is that allowed? How exactly would he be stopped? And the jury decides the facts. So he is allowed to lie and the jury makes that determination.
It's his trial strategy. He has to be allowed to do as he chooses.
Once he even objected to be called "he"... 🤣
I guess it's a psychological defense to distance himself as much as possible to his criminal self, in the hopes everyone else would, too
@@leechan1 That's very insightful, and I think he thought that it would work, too. I think he thought that he could convince the jury that some alter-ego, mentally ill version of himself was responsible for the act, or that the car had somehow malfunctioned and he was heroically beeping the horn, trying to warn people of the danger that he couldn't help. I honestly think that kind of gaslighting used to work on his mama and grandma, and that's why he thought the rest of us were as sympathetic of his storytelling. Boy, was he wrong! I think he was honestly surprised by the verdict and the sentencing, believing right up until the end that he would go free at the end of it all.
My heart breaks for the woman in red. She is shaking and has to look the monster who ran her over and answer his ridiculous questioning. She did a great job and I wish her well. DB is the most narcissistic person I have ever witnessed. I hope karma gets him in prison.
I kind of hope nothing happens to him in prison.
Literally nothing, I hope he sits there with nothing to do, watch or read. For decades and decades
The detective in the beginning was not playing his game lol. “Do I remember if I can recall”? 😂😂😂😂And his response to the “do you see the state of Wisconsin in here”? Detective: “yes, the state is at the prosecution table” 😂😂😂😂
The detective was great.
I like him. I feel like he is one of those cops that will allow sov cits tie themselves in linguistic knots at a traffic stop. LOL.
I was SO GLAD that someone finally explained that to him.
@@cattycorner8 not that it helped.
@@sallycinnamon5370 We have seen that it did not help, haven't we? 😏
It’s so creepy how he watches the footage with no emotion.
Not really. He ran over 6 people and injured many with no emotion.
He's a sociopath... that's their M.O.
I think she is speaking about specifically watching him, watch footage with no emotion. It's a totally different thing reading about it in the news versus actually being able to watch his reaction to his behavior. I absolutely agree with your comment though.
Subhuman ran over kids and old folks and just continued that day. Subhuman goes to a strangers home to call for a Uber for him because his phone is dead. Feed him to the alligators and let’s move on
Agreed
DB trying to imply that he could have hit more people is horrible.
Yeah that is the absolute WORST defense when you drive through and hit 70 people at a parade. “Well technically there were thousands of people there, i could’ve hit many more. You’re lucky I only hit 70.” What an absolute piece of human garbage. He genuinely thinks that way.
The dude acts like hitting 68 of them was him containing his anger. It’s unreal!
@@Beautiful_Mess agreed! It’s “mind boggling “
Police officers , EMS , fire personnel and last but not least ...helpful citizens . You are truly appreciated for all you do . 💜🚒🚑🚔🚓.
Also, all of the medical professionals that worked at the hospitals that victims were taken to ❤
“Is it fair to say” is the “what if anything” of this trial
😅😅
Too your knowledge 😂😂😂
Brilliant 😀
💯
☠️
7:57:08 Brooks is laughing with the Judge as if he thinks he is an actual lawyer or something. The guy is a murderer and sits there laughing this is insanity.
Those that laugh last. Laugh the longest.. He aint getting the last laugh.
He is a malignant narcissist who believes he’s smarter than everyone in the room & he thinks because he’s defending himself that he’s just one of the gang 🙄
Laugh now cry later
I wish they had the death penalty
Yup, he thinks he’s got her right where he wants her. When in fact she is just letting him hang himself. Tho, I do think she has helped him a lil to much.
What is the purpose of constantly saying “grounds” when the plaintiff attorneys always give a reason for objection. This man spews jargon with no comprehension of what it means
Poor Nicole keeps looking at the judge for support. She is panicking and shaking. He asked same questions multiple times, judge should have been more strict with him, cause she is extremely traumatized and clearly fears Brooks.
I agree. In her attempt to avoid a successful appeal, she inadvertantly allowed the witnesses, victims, prosecution and family members present to be disrespected and retraumatized to the extreme. I get why she handled him with kid gloves. I get it. Many tend to get defensive when I point this out. But she was far too lenient with him throughout, imo.
@@gena4638 While I mostly agree with how she handled this case, and I understand why she went out of her way to protect the defendants rights, I think she definitely could have put him in his place more when it came to him questioning his victims. They deserve protection too.
He says "grounds" AFTER they've already said the grounds. And he says "good morning" to the witnesses like he thinks he's a lawyer and not a POS child murderer.
I don't think he really understood what "grounds" means. As the trial progressed, the prosecution would state the grounds, and one time, he even said, "It has to be more than 'irrelevancy'". I think he thought it was another one of his "magic incantations" sovcits believe in. He also seemed to think "hearsay" was some catch all objection, because at least once he objected "hearsay" to when the question "Did you hear the SUV beep its horn?"
Seeking to exclude a witness because they have a single prior conviction is the height of irony. He's questioning the credibility of others, but expects his to be automatically accepted? He himself has MULTIPLE priors.
He says (and acts) like he has no idea what to do in a court room but his record says otherwise. Maybe he should have been listening to his previous attorneys in previous cases so he’d know what he was doing lol
And then when he was presenting his case in chief, he called a witness that had 7 convictions, which does make the guy with I think a misdemeanor that much more ironic.
That's how it works. It goes to the witness and whether they are credible.
It's disgusting that he thinks Mr. Greene's misdemeanor how ever many years ago is going to make him less credible after trespassing. Excuse me sir, you drove through a parade....pound sand! His creepy little hands and then him asking Mr. Greene if the reason he wanted to leave the parade was because they heard gun shots! No Mr. BRookes it's because you ran over my children. This guy is a Dolt!
For those asking what was "stricken" from the records, it was the video of Officer Philipps speaking with Brooks's ex girlfriend. The reason it was stricken was due to a comment Erika made regarding a previous DV incident where Brooks allegedly ran over her foot. The judge had previously ruled prior matters would be inadmissible in this case. So instead of redacting it and potentially drawing more attention to it, they struck it.
I think the real reason they don’t want to bring this up in court is the fact she was still a teen (
The way he talks like he has some authority after killing those people is just insane. He acts like they owe him respect?!
he quickly snaps back with "grounds" after every objection, like he has procedural turrets
It's like hitting the buzzer on Jeopardy, if you are first you win!
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Or like he’s playing Uno
@@Grimm299 😂🤣
😂😂😂
Only a complete narcissist can think that they don't need a lawyer for a criminal trial
Especially after you murder 6 people and hurt dozens! Allegedly that is.
In a way, you could say brooks didn't have any choice. A real lawyer can not file nonsense or frivolous motions, or ask irrelevant questions. Brooks case has no real defense. So brooks is going for a ridicules defense that a real lawyer would not be allowed to do. "The court has no jurisdiction", "I beeped my horn, so it was OK to run them over"
I'm looking forward to the narcissistic rage that will ensue post guilty verdicts.
Especially a criminal trial of this magnitude!! It’s absolutely mind blowing 🤯🤦🏼♀️
Especially one who thought he'd get out of it by claiming there was something wrong with the red SUV. I think it's great. He thought he could get out of it 🤣
OMG. Listen to Brooks admit to being the driver @1:40:57 he asks the officer
“At that time did you see ME” then he quickly tries to say “the vehicle”
It was the greatest slip up ever!
No i didnt hear him say that. I've played it again. I didn't hear.
Watched it heaps. I still can't hear him say that.
I heard it. Very quick he did say me.
There have been several slip ups by DB. That was a good catch. He tried to cover it up the same way he did the other times. I did not catch this one the first time I watched it.
@LeeLee-tw2wo I heard it. Its right after they accidentally take the video down.
“ I definitely don’t want Erika Patterson released “ 😂 he couldn’t wait to get her back on the stand for no reason whatsoever. It’s funny because when detective Casey was called the 2nd time regarding him being the head detective on the case. Mr Brooks didn’t like that and I believe he said “ there was more than enough time to ask him all of the questions when he was up there last time “. They should have told him the same thing about Detective Guth and Erika Patterson 😂😂 I don’t think this demon heard himself speaking sometimes
They did tell him…. He ignored it.
@@skyehamm9629No they didn’t tell him that. The prosecutor told the judge that they would want an offer of proof as to why he would need to call those witnesses again when they were already up there. He gave his reasoning and was able to call them again. Detective Casey had relevant information during his second testimony. A lot of information. When detective Guth and Erika Patterson were called it as all a repeat from their past testimony or a bunch of irrelevant questions
Can’t believe the calm, clear and controlled testimony of the witnesses in light of the horror they experienced. You are commended for your contribution to the prosecution of this POS.
These are the best witnesses I've ever seen in a televised trial. Every one of them are just crushing him with single word answers, and not allowing him to play his silly word games. They've been amazing.
@@toddmoore9138 probably seems like that because he is representing himself... I agree with you though, they've all had clear and accurate testimonies. But it's all on video and he's just that bad at being a jail house lawyer.
Yeah it’s amazing. I wish none of them had acknowledged him saying he didn’t accept his name and just carried on saying YOU
I agree. All of the officers, detectives and victims did an amazing job testifying. It personally irked me when witnesses would call him 'sir' just because he's a piece of garbage who doesn't deserve that title (I wish they all would've called him by his name and 'you' since he hated it) but it didn't take away from their testimony at all. In fact, it spoke volumes to their character-being courteous even when its undeserving.
The prosecution thought a lot about who they were calling to the stand. They tried to be compassionate here, and probably they thought they would succeed in convicting him anyway with so much testimony and so many videos.
His self-entitled attitude just irks me! It’s so hard to watch this trial because of that.
I’m sorry to the families and friends who were affected by this in any way. ❤
Yeah he's an epic idiot...I'm starting to hear in my sleep "would it be fair to say..". I just wanna shake him and say it's "asked" not "aksed"
Small price to pay if you stop and realize the miles and miles and miles worth of sausages that are going to be driving the hershey highway over the rest of his worthless life. 😆
@@stevebartz4885 🤣
Not any different than defense lawyers
Around the 1 hour mark, Opper refers to the driver as "it" the changes it to "he" and Brooks says I don't consent to being called "he". But I thought you weren't the driver Darrell?
Over a year later and we are all still waiting for this judge to prove subject matter jurisdiction........lol
Surely the appellate courts are itching to right that wrong.
She did prove it in an order.
@@skyehamm9629 Yeah did you catch the "lol" on the end of my comment? That signals joke. But thanks for that meaningless clarification
He learned a new legal term over the weekend. “Grounds” after every objection.
Too bad he still has no idea what "hearsay" means.
😂 by the 10th time I was literally screaming “That is NOT hearsay!”
I feel like he watched some law tv shows like Law & Order over the weekend.
I think he got "tips" from other inmates. I can just visualize the inmate saying to another... and then I told him to yell GROUNDS randomly while the victims are testifying.
I though he said Grouse . I thought what do woodland game birds have to do with anything ?
Does he think it’s a defence to mow a crowd down because you honked but didn’t slow down when no-one had time to move??
He’s a total POS… anyone with even half a dead heart wouldn’t want to put the victims through this.
And if he says GROUNDS again 🤬
Where is proof he honked on the parade route?
@@63076topher in his warped mind… and who would have heard it during a parade if he did?? He didn’t slow down or stop.
Evil.
Ah yes, Day 3. The day when DB began to shout and snarl "GROUNDS" at every opportunity., and this was only shortly after he had offered his most sincere apology to the court for his rude behavior on preceding days. Very strange.
@Don't Be A Richard I don't believe that he cares about any rules, he only attempts to push things to the limit in order to disrupt. This guy has willful ignorance down to a science.
@@catwhspr I absolutely agree with you!
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Mr. Brooks: “Could you make a turn down the street when it was barricaded?”
Me: You could plow through the barricade like you did the people in the parade…
He went through the barricades to get onto the parade route.
The judge striking the video is the correct ruling. She is going out of her way to make her neutrality clear. Outstanding.
I'm late to the game. But i agree. It's super frustrating that anything goes in his favor. It's a clear cut case that he did this.... I love that she's clearly dotting all her I's and crossing her T's to avoid a chance for an appeal.
I really hate it when he is given a "win"... but... I do however know that it has to happen sometimes, and I totally get why!!! It just totally grosses me out tho to see the excitement his narcissistic self gets out of those said wins. He really thinks he is doing something, when in reality it is just the rules being followed and it is to help ensure he cannot ever come back and win any type of appeal. The judge did an AMAZING job, as did the prosecution team, in dealing with his hard to deal with self. Too bad the death penalty wasn't an option for him. If anyone has ever deserved it, he is one of them... along with Nicholas Cruz, and don't even get me started on how that turned out!?!
I agree ☝️
I absolutely agree!!
I’m just starting this segment - should be interesting since he successfully got the video struck yet, he insisted the officer remain under subpoena. What does the officer have to contribute if his video evidence has been disallowed? 🤷♀️
6:42:17 Brooks - "So with all the people that appeared injured, you didn’t stop to render any aid to any of them?!" - *Excuse me Darrell Brooks… did YOU stop to rended aid to any of the people YOU injured or killed??!! Or even bother to SLOW DOWN?!?! Didn’t think so… next question.*
And to have the nerve to ask this with a "how dare you not help people" tone… fricken boils my blood!!😤😠😡🤬
Oh i was expecting the last witness to catch a charge or 2. way he was hugging himself to keep control, he was getting hot.
Seriously!💯
@@SimplyLolly, objection there’s nobody by the name of Darrell Brooks
DB is pure evil!
Even after the prosecution states the ground he asks for grounds. Lol
He is enjoying the power..pure and simple. Putting these people through trauma again and again. Kudos to the Judge. Love to the families.
I wish the death penalty was option in Wisconsin. Case this vile with facts so cut and dry would be great contender.
I was surprised by how nice most of the witnesses were being to him when he was asking all of those irrelevant questions
Gaslighting. And a Control Freak. Darrel Brooks is a pure blood narcissist
Everyone has the right to defend themselves and face their accusers
@@lisamcclendon2720..actually an incorrect statement..how do they face an accuser that's been murdered!...the prosecution are bringing the case on behalf of his accusers!
all this is leading up to the most orgasmic guilty verdict in trial history
Watching this after the verdict it was.
“The man who represents himself has a fool for a client.”
Grounds?
It's never been truer
@@Kareem180 😂
@@ktrsmom that judges needs a medal!! Because I couldn’t.
@@Kareem180 I agree! The witnesses/victims are amazingly strong as well. The emotional scars will be with them forever.
his continued misuse of "grounds" is one of the most infuriating things i've witnessed
I wish the prosecution would do the same thing back to him and tell grounds every time he objects. That would be hilarious.
He cannot handle a woman disagreeing with him.
The cop in the background looks like he’d be nice until you gave him a reason not to be. I love the looks he’s giving Darrell during this trial.
Obviously he spoke to someone or read something over the weekend that told him to make sure he had the grounds for every objection so now, even when the prosecution is providing the grounds, he’s still barking out “grounds” 🙄🙄🙄 Doesn’t make his questions any more relevant or incisive
Kamala, no doubt.
It's fair to say this "alleged defendant" watched a couple of episodes of law and order and thought he could legally blonde his way out of murder charges 🙄
Throughout this whole case I don’t understand why he has such an aversion to saying please and thank you. He’s ordering the state and the clerk to do things for him and no courtesy at all.
He doesn’t even know how to use “grounds”. He interrupts the prosecutors as they are stating the basis of their objections. What is infuriating is they are allowing him to do it.
I think the judge has realized the quickest way to get him out of the courtroom and in to prison is to play his game.
@@cl4998 Yet at the sane time, she is doing all she can to prevent a mistrial. She's not afraid to show him who's boss after giving him a few broken record replies when she ends court at the end of the day. She just walks away "the gavel" has closed the day.
All to show he was never mistreated, and allow the jury to see he’s a remorseless demon.
I was wondering if anyone else caught that. Not only is he using it wrong, but his tone when he says it does not help him.
Also him saying 'hearsay', when the testimony is coming from the witnesses. Omg. He needs to look up the definition. 😂