Top 5 Times Darrell Brooks Thought He Knew the Law
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 окт 2022
- The Law&Crime Network's Jesse Weber recaps the top five times Darrell Brooks thought he knew the law while representing himself during his trial.
Listen to Law&Crime's Sidebar Podcast on Apple & Spotify:
Apple: apple.co/3wMgRgB
Spotify: spoti.fi/3wITe7b
Host:
Jesse Weber: / jessecordweber
LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:
RUclips Management - Bobby Szoke
Podcasting - Sam Goldberg
Video Editing - Logan Harris
Guest Booking - Alyssa Fisher
Social Media Management - Kiera Bronson
#DarrellBrooks #WaukeshaParade #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
He was so busy arguing law, he forgot to argue his case
Because he knew he didn’t have one 😂
@@slaws2279 I disagree I think he actually believed that he was going to beat this.
@@deerick3109 you may be right!
@@deerick3109 he definitely believed that but he genuinely didn’t have a defense. He didn’t say he didn’t do it. Or even present any evidence of the recalls he mentioned in closing
@@deerick3109 The fact that he believed simply informing the jury about the power of nullification would result in them using that power in this case shows how delusional he is
Duhrrell : "I'm not stupit!!!"
Judge Dorrow : "Well, I disagree with that sir."
Priceless
My favorite part of the video
Great reply on the judge's part...lol
Judge is a fine combo of beauty, brains, and balls!
Grounds!!! 😀
This dude was absolutely his worst enemy in this case. I think it was so bad that the only reason the jury took 3 1/2 hours to come back with a verdict was because it took that long to fill out the paperwork for all 77 charges.
He’s a narcissist, he delusions made him think he could do it lol
And to stop laughing at this fool for representing himself.
3.5 hours * 3600 seconds/ 1 hour = 12,600 seconds. 12,600 seconds/77 charges = 163.63 seconds per charge. Seems reasonable!
I believe someone did the math, as did someone in these comments, that they only took 2 seconds or minutes to sign lol
@@jacobschiller4486 with those numbers, my assumption feels right.
I mean, despite his crimes, we all must admit, he was GREAT on this prosecution. He really did work hard towards convicting himself, and proving his instability, evilness, and guilt.
Literally proved the prosecution case with them!
A lot of idiots like Brooks frequently, everyday across the US, prove they are sadistic idiots with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Those people get 1 year of “”supervised”” probation only for them to be arrested again within 2 months.
Personally I just hope this literal clown rots for the rest of his life in prison with every chance for parole being self-sabotaged.
His refusal to answer in my opinion was a delay tactic
The prosecution's strategy was "sit back and let him talk".
This man has so much potential on law that, he was the best prosecutor in that room! No one could’ve convicted him better than himself.
Lol brilliant
He actually would've been a good attorney if he knew the law.
Dats da bidness😅
Accurate assessment.
@@TruthHurtzandHealz no he wouldn’t he’d make everything about him and how much power he think has
The maniacal audacity for him to believe that the jury would actually nullify the applicable law and not find him guilty.
He really thought he'd be in the clear if only he could educate the jury about the option to nullify.
He's hilariously delusional in many ways.
He thought there was bleeding heart far leftest in the jury
Lll
What's most astonishing, is that there are people out there who support him! There's this group called "Justice for Darrell Brooks"
IT MAKES ME SMILE NOW WHEN I THINK OF HIS DELUSIONAL AUDACITY IN THAT COURTROOM AND HOW HE HORRIFICLY TREATED THE JUDGE BECASUE I KNOW HE IS IN A TINY CELL ALONE OR UNTIL HIS HUSBANDS FORCE HIM TO CONSUMATE HIS MATRIMONY I HOPE AND PRAY EVERY SINGLE NIGHT FOR THE REST OF HIS MISERABLE LIFE.😊😊
Nothing says “I’m a grown man” like throwing a temper tantrum and then hiding in your box fort.
Is that lawful law?
What about Subject Matter Jurisdiction??😜
@@spaceace1006 is that a tackit agreement? I accepted for value and returned for value this document
😂😂😂 Nice
Substained! Grown man with grown kids 😂
The lawyers he fired must be watching with their feet up eating popcorn 😂😅😅😅
The smiles on their faces the day his free legal representation were allowed to step down were hilarious. I'd say they're still relieved to this day. I'm sure he was totally obnoxious the entire time they were near him.
Why can I see their faces laughing while catching popcorn soo clearly?😂😂 you know some idiots gonna make a movie out of this!
I hope they still got paid, even if it is taxpayer dollars.
They looked EXTREMELY relieved the day he let them go.
I don’t know what you think lawyers do in their free time, but it’s certainly not wasting their time watching this clown.
His defense was that he wasn't speeding and he honked his horn, so it wasn't his fault that people didn't get out of his way fast enough. He blamed his victims because he is a malignant narcissist and he believes he can do no wrong. The truth is that he was out on bail, he beat up his ex girlfriend, her friends called the cops, and he was enraged and didn't want to go back to jail. So, in his rage and fear of arrest he mowed over dozens of people without blinking an eye because they were in his way and he's a monster. I'm glad that he will never be allowed in public again to hurt the innocent, he deserves his life sentence.
@@chicagorilla4983 You do not accidentally drive a vehicle into 67 people.
Well said!
He deserves capitol punishment by red Ford Escape.
you forgot the part in his closing statement when he mentioned for hte first time that the type of truck he was driving was recalled for faulty brakes...that was another one of his excuses...
@@chicagorilla4983 Oopsie poopsie I slipped and murdered many people, and injured almost a hundred others.
As a former toddler I know how this guy felt
I love everyone that feels the need to tell me something about this comment. Like it bothers you that much to see someone get likes. You’re all just like Darrell Brooks.
😂😂
😂 nice 👍
🎯 🤣
😂😅
😭
Brooks has absolutely no ability to "read a room". If he thinks he was going to get sympathy from anyone besides his Mother who enabled his behaviors all his life, he is delusional.
He literally _is_ delusional. This guy is hardcore personality disorder, extreme narcissism. In his mind if you repeat "yOuR TrUtH" enough then people believe you. He's had his life up until now of people just giving up arguing with him, so he thought he was "winning" the arguments and could do the same thing in court.
Brooks barely has the ability to read the Sunday comics! That is one very Stooooooopid man-baby.
Ok. So how does everyone think he would have done without all the prep work
his defense attorney gave him? Think DB decided to go pro per since he received all those files?
@@olliedillon5652 Whatever his attorney gave him is prettymuch moot seeing as his defence was predicated on fantasy law that doesn't exist, and he focused on arguments that hold no merit.
I think his own mother would have literally had to find some way to sneak on the jury and never be found out for Brooks to EVER have a chance of being found not guilty. Evil little creep of a man.
His "I'm the smartest person in every room" attitude is gonna do him so well in prison lmao his fellow inmates are gonna love that
Lmfao best comment
He's gonna be the type that stays in and out of segregation because he's going throw Peep and poop all over the officers and none of the inmates are going to have anything to do with them besides want to stab him.
Emphasis on the “love” part, if you know what I mean 😁😱
Love aka enjoy and smile knowing this guy will never run over anymore innocent people at a parade
I can't believe he feels competent to run his defence. That shows how narcissistic he is !!!
I think one of the funniest aspect of this case is that the jury returned verdicts on 76 counts in about 3 hours. That's about 2.5 minutes per verdict, including any breaks. Just going through and signing the forms would take at least 30 minutes, That tells me that there was absolutely no disagreement in the jury room.
I think the major "sticking point" was the last charge. It is also the only charge they requested to re-watch evidence for on the second day. It should also be said that these jurors were apparently willing to WORK, because they requested evidence late into the first day and elected a very late stopping time when the judge clearly gave them the option to break whenever they felt like it. So it is safe to assume they didn't argue a lot, just made sure among themselves that everybody was in agreement on EVERY charge - you know, to be thorough.
@@QemeH You had a perfect analysis of the jury. Textbook even. Good job!
I bet sitting there and hearing all the verdicts was the real punishement for him, he could'nt object or argue for more than an hour. Only thing left was staring at jury in pathetic way.
They were tired of wasting time.
I agree, but at 2.5 minutes per verdict among 12 jurors, is that really "deliberation"?
It's so cute to see a little boy wearing his daddy's dress shirt.
Lmao
I dont think there was a father figure in the picture.
YES!!!!
Brooks : im not stupid
Judge : i disagree sir
This guy is doing a great public service by making us all laugh before he disappears into a box for the rest of his life.
Imagine him defending Griner.
You mean like Jussie Smollet was supposed to? He served... what, 5 days in prison for 6 felonies?
@@baconoverlord7982 You can revisit this comment and gloat when Brooks is released…
Uh oh you made a fucky wucky now ur being sent to the *forever box*
@@BricksAndSparrows idk what that persons comment was cause they clearly deleted it but I mean homie was found guilty on all like 75 counts lol. He’s never going to see freedom again.
The most infuriating part of the whole trial was watching him think he was the smartest person in the room.
Yeah, that tends to happen. Dunning Kruger effect.
It was also the most entertaining part lmao
@@leyna1221 it sure was 😂
I like how anytime he is handed paperwork. He goes into full child mode. He closes his eyes, refuses to look at the paper handed to him, cries about how 'he never got any paperwork'.
He really is a 4 year old having temper tantrums. The only difference is his vocabulary.
It is called Dunning Krugers. It's where you're so very incompetent, that you are completely unaware of your incompetence, and actually consider yourself an expert.
And it is SURPRISINGLY common in the U.S., today.
The fact that he built himself a box shield... like "if I cant see them, they cant see me" child-like behavior. 🤣 he tried so hard to sound smart and ended up building a box fort cause he got frustrated. 🤣
He's partly right. They couldn't see him... but they could also move his box fort.
Did he actually think the jury was going to acquit him because he pointed out jury nullification? I think that after the first two days the jurors were already convinced he was guilty.
HUGE kudos to this judge for not jumping over the bench & choking him out!!! Her patience is on a whole other level.
Fact!
She's pregnant or she probably would have 😆
I disagree. The Judge should have told Brooks that his right to represent himself would be affirmed by the court CONTINGENT on his capability to present a defense.
When Brooks got out of line the first time he should have been warned. The second time, a Public Defender takes over and Brooks would have been gagged and restrained as necessary. No court in the land is impressed by cranky defendants.
So...I disagree....This Judge is MUCH too permissive. But, I absolutely agree that the Judge is called the Judge for good reason...... It was her call.
She did this intelligently, why u ask?!? He was trying to cause a mistrial and drag this out as long as he cld. He's a narcissit. This is how he thrives. Now, by the judge acting so professional and not overreacting, HE GONE BUH EFFIN BYE!!!!! Now, he's no longer relevant, maybe the many many many victims he traumatized and tried continuing to traumatize ,they can seek healing.
Truth!
This man is a blessing to content creators.
His stupidity is legendary
Him: I'm not stupid
Judge: I disagree with that sir.
He keeps saying "with all due respect " he doesn't show any respect at all to every person in the courtroom.
Underrated comment!!! Can't think of a better way to put it. His stupidity is indeed legendary 🤣🤣
I was literally just saying this aloud to someone . So many clicks and views off his stupidity!
I'm about to get famous off this fool...trust me
I can't believe how patient this judge is WOW!!!!
*smart. Her patience clearly ran out early on but she's smart enough to know she has to contain herself and do everything possible to avoid a mistrial in her court.
Nah, I can’t believe bro actually asked for jury nullification not just to the judge, not just to the jury’s face, but to the jury’s face directly after the judge tells him several times over that it’s completely illegal to do that 😂
“I’m not STOOPID!” 🤪
“Well, ...I disagree with that, Sir.” 😐
I caught that too, not the context she meant it in I'm sure, but a part of me hopes she got a kick out of that considering all the BS he put her through!
That's not what she meant but it does fit very well 🤣
You caught that too eh? For a fact, she dropped that on the record as a burn.
I think she disagreed with his statement “…the state coached their witnesses” or something like that, but hey, we can all agree that the response from Judge Dorow is funny. 😄
😂😂
The level of arrogance, narcissism, and hostility coupled with the lack of self-awareness, remorse, empathy, sympathy, compassion, professionalism, and just human decency this man brings to the courtroom enraged me to a level I didn’t know I had…
This, you put it perfectly. I was having trouble fully understanding this kind of frustrating rage.
there's plenty of democrats like this.
Emphasis on narcissism
That and the added fact that he wasted everyone’s time to what amounted to absolutely nothing for his case
_Bah what lawful law can you arrest me?_
How about his ‘double jeopardy’ defense. Betcha he never opened a file when he went back to his cell each day - he never had a question prepared. Those files were all prepared by the lawyers assigned by the Court that he fired.
I believe that.
Not a chance. That wasn’t an actually applicable instance of the concept of double jeopardy, it was yet another example of the type of law he knew - from TV shows and movies, “jailhouse lawyers,” cursory Wikipedia searches, and conspiracy theory/fringe pseudolegal nonsense like civil sovereignty.
DB: I'm not stupid
Best judge ever: I disagree with that sir
So true!
It amazed me how he claimed to be a sovereign citizen living under his own jurisdiction, but would constantly claim that his constitutional rights were being violated. WTF?
I honestly wouldn't even be surprised if he genuinely didnt know what a sovereign citizen actually is or believes and purely used this tactic because he had heard about it somewhere lmfao
Interested in learning about his childhood… probably a badass kid
How could he be a sovereign citizen with a state issued ID?
You know ...wink wink
Exactly!!! Can’t work both ways 🤦🏻♀️
When you are not the clown🤡, but the whole circus 🎪
I had a blast following this trial. Very entertaining and comical lmao
Beat comment ever!!!
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾🙌🏽
In the words of Abe Lincoln or Mark Twain......."Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt." If only someone gave Brooks that advice PRIOR to him representing himself! lol
Good one😂
He killed a kid and never once said “I’m sorry” never showed a shred of remorse. He even in his final remarks only made himself a victim.
AND he killed 5 others as well!!! WTH? Their lives mean nothing? What, because they were old and lived their lives??? 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
@@Inbetweenthelinesnowif we go to a better place wen we die then does our life really mean something?
This trial was hilarious, I think he really thought he was gonna hold up the court. Weather you agree or disagree with the judge there is still a process, DB thought he could delay that process but he ended up playing himself.
It was funny! What made it more humorous, was the judge didn't act like a superior known it all, she just bantered the 'law' back with him! 🏅🏅😂
@@lica1598 after watching judge Dorrow announce her run for state it all makes sense now. The way she controlled her emotions, had no ego and gave him more than enough chances every step of the way just to ensure anyone watching later would clearly see what was happening.
Regarding the jury nullification option: the idea that any 12 people would ever agree to ignore the law IN HIS FAVOR is laughable. His inflated sense of self worth is awe inspiring.
A key part of narcissistic personality disorder is not just an inflated ego, but assuming that other people will view you in a positive light and have sympathy for you despite all logic.
Brooks was found guilty on all 76 counts by all jurors.
@@RainCloud848 🤪
@@RainCloud848 "Word!" :)
Still absolutely perplexed that the thought went through his head that any jury member would jump on board with the idea.
Darrell Brooks gave a new meaning to ‘A Little Information is the most Dangerous weapon in the hands of a Fool’.
FACCCTSSSSSSSS
Haven't heard that one, very true
All of those "Sovereign Citizens" are fools.
I've never heard that saying before, but I can never imagine it being so accurate than in this instance!
@@LuRoyJenkins it’s a saying that I’ve coined , doing work in skills development, and mentorship programs I do as a broadcaster
Pretty bad when your Lawyer gets the same sentence as you did. 🤣
She was generous enough to oblige to his requests at all. She remained patient through all of his interruptions and outbursts, and intimidating the witnesses and the jury too. I'm glad his attempted sabotage of the case backfired on him so beautifully. I don't feel bad for him at all.
and that is why the Marcus from Bad Santa clone is in prison forever.
Imagine being in a relationship with this man and having to deal with this amount of ignorance, gaslighting, and aggression every time you got into an argument. Unbearable
I'd imagine the constant beatings would be worse but I guess that's pretty bad too
He also pimped (yes, he diď) her out while they were living in his mother's house not too long after she had the baby.
That's why he sought out a 15 YEAR OLD CHILD!!!!
And being a sovereign citizen 😂😂
well sadly we don't live under Sharia law and women are free to be with whoever they want. She made her bed
This is what happens when you fire your attorney and get your legal advice from other convicts
😂
🤣🤣🤣🤭
RUclips lawyers basically
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 FACTS
Brooks appears to be a “know it all” so I doubt if this Rhodes Scholar would have listened to anyone.
I will say, because of this trial AND this channel, I’ve learned a bit about the law and I also have a new appreciation for what lawyers do and why they charge so much for their services. Insane amount of information they need to have!!
I once heard lawyers are with words, what surgeons are with knives… great comparison I never thought of it that way.
@@nolagirl2458 then Darrell Brooks must have been using butter knives or a spoon. Or his finger....
@@shioriryukazeHe was honestly using a paper towel
Omg , thank god someone said it’s ‘sustain’ and not ‘Substain’ I haven’t heard a channel who covered this case mention that he kept saying it incorrectly. It was hurting my ears every time.
I seriously doubt even one juror would even consider nullification for that jerk.
If there ever was one, they'd be just as psychologically damaged as him
After forcing them to be out of work for weeks longer than necessary, and acting like a victim the whole time, probably not.
I am fairly confident Darrel was banking on a juror only seeing skin color and nullifying it based on that. It's such a shame to say such a thing but in our current culture that happens a lot. However, Darrel's crimes were probably so horrific and his behaviour so terrible that any chance he had of that went out the window
Right!? you know they were trying to figure out if it was possible to recommend the death penalty. lol
@@beastmodesalvia joking aside, I'm pretty confident that every juror, unlike many outsiders to Wisconsin, knew that Wisconsin does not have the death penalty, and there's a story to why Wisconsin got rid of it. I saw in so many chat comments to law and crime, and other attorneys channels, that few outside the profession and the state of Wisconsin, knew that Wisconsin does not have the death penalty.
"I'm not stupid"
"I disagree with that, sir"
Well said, Judge Dorow
That was horrible. The judge should be reprimanded for that attitude, simply horrible behavior by the judge. Brooks could teach that judge a thing or 2
Not without a car and a head start...
@@michael-4k4000 hello Darrell!
Grounds!!
That was perfectly timed the way she said that 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I’ve been arrested a few times, not proud of it but he really reminds me of that one guy who gets tossed in the tank and is ready to tell EVERYONE how innocent he is. There’s always that one guy, and it’s absolutely hilarious because every time, as soon as they start in on WHY they’re innocent it becomes clear that even by their own account they’re guilty.
Ever met any street lawyers?
We’re you there for domestic violence?
😂😂😂
I remember a guy who was in seg for making a third party phone call. He kept going on about how they couldn't prove it was him. It was irritating to listen to, because he had a speech impediment!
im convinced that he's the guy who.... you know that guy whose in there and they're like "Oh man, that's what you're in for? Go to this website and they'll tell you exactly how to get off..." ? I feel like Brooks is the guy who believed THAT guy. lol
His obsession with jury nullification was hilarious to me because he was so delusional to think the people would overlook the fact that he killed 6 people and injured 60 others and throw that out the window. I don't understand how he could possibly imagine they would do that.
One word: narcissism
Because he is nothing but trash
Now he can sit in his little cell and pretend he was found innocent in his own make believe trial. 😂 🤦🏾♂️
Theres a reason Neanderthals died out.
she shouldve let them just so we could all laugh in his face. but respect to her for locking him up as quickly as possible
Kudos to the patience of the Bailiff right behind him for not bursting into laughter.🤣🤣😂😂
A true genius of our time. His brilliance will be missed. Had such a way with words.
The judge literally was annoyed and even put it the best way she could "I can't hold your hand through this case sir ".... 🤣
"Why not? Y'all doin' all dis Hee-Hee and Tee-Tee an' not tell me nuffin'!!"😜
He literally learned "subject matter jurisdiction" and "jury nullification" like a day before court I bet 😂😂
Phrases like "Subject Matter Jurisdiction" and "Tacit Agreement" are most commonly used in Contract Law and Civil Law, they have no bearing or meaning in Criminal Law.
As would most people, but most people are also smart enough to take on legal counsel who do know the legalese, instead of becoming an armchair lawyer overnight
Don’t forget “is it fair to say that”. Lmao!!
Nah, his misunderstanding of it is typical of a sovereign citizen conspiracy theorist.
Objection! "Here say". He was here and he said it.
He also tried to negotiate a shorter sentence, since he had already been in for a year, what a genius
Trying to tell a judge (with the patience of a Saint) how to do her job, after you killed multiple people, based on some insane Sovereign Citizen jurisprudence he learned from conspiracy theorists on the Interwebs, is the most outlandish version of mansplaining in history.
This trial should be taught not only to law students but to graduate students in psychology, social work and mental health. This is a classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder in action.
Excellent suggestion!
I agree 💯
should also be taught at clown school too. but i digress...you're onto something!
He was diagnosed with antisocial PD, not NPD.
Are you a psychologist? Probably not.
Please stop trying to give gross diagnosis when you have neither the education nor clinicals.
He has Anti social behavior and several character flows like his logical self image and that of others. It's not about narcissism.
As a former Correctional Officer aka prison guard, this is the WORST kind of inmate to deal with, a Know It All who if they actually Knew Anything, would not be Locked Up in Prison for Life!
I object !!
Thank you for your service
What happens to people like this in jail? Do they get along with everyone or do they get beat up by everyone?
I was also a county jail employee for 4 years in a different capacity. Trust me I am familiar with this kind of inmate. They spend two days in the law library and think they are Perry Mason.
@@tld1235 I mainly worked high security, 1 offender per cell, almost 24 hour locked down except for rec and chow. So I assume they were in there for their own protection or tried to get smart with the wrong guard who outsmarted them and got them locked up out of general population.
I have learned so much regarding law since I watched your channel, and the most important thing I learned was to never, ever, ever, ever, ever try to defend myself in a court of law, unless I want to make myself look like a complete arse in front of everyone.
The algorithm actually worked! This is EXACTLY the kind of thing I've been looking for, this case is very interesting to me and I've wanted a more in-depth analysis of why brooks is wrong! I wish it was more detailed but it's a very good video!
"I don't consent to being called that name."
"I'm sure you don't consent to be on trial either, yet here we are."
He also didn’t want to be called a person , he was a human . Anything just to argue
Well, after his guilty finding. He no longer has a name just a number.
Dude thought the court was a 5th grade playground argument.
Can someone please explain to me, how a 'sovereign citizen', doesn't have to obey the law, but then thinks that same law should protect his rights ? 🤔🤔😂🤣✌
I want to know how they think they're exempt from taxes, but still want to use public roads and schools?
@@axelkusanagi4139 Indeed.
They wants the pros but not the cons, that's how. They think they're special enough to make the country bend to them but don't want the country to make them bend to it.
Now that I've had a chance to sit down and realize what was going on with this case, I realized that it wasn't just the judge that Brooks was trying to get to slip up. It was everybody. Because if one person had slipped up in this whole thing, he could called a mistrial. The whole point of this case is getting everybody to be the reason why the mistrial was called. I forgot about when apparently there was a tweet that happened and he tried to use that tweet for the mistrial. The questions that he asked the witnesses, if he had gotten the rise that he wanted out of them, that would have been a reason for mistrial. If he had gotten somebody in the jury to act out of conduct, that would have been a reason for the mistrial. That's what this whole thing was about. Who can I pull to be the reason why there is a mistrial? And there was no one who jumped. So as much as we applaud the judge for her professionalism. Each and every person in that courtroom deserves, I think, just as much praise, especially the victims and those affected.
Spot on 👍🤙
Lol you give him way to much credit. Brooks is not that smart and he had absolutely no plan or strategy.
A motion for a mistrial has to include a legal basis supporting it . Simply getting a witness to react or say something inappropriate is not in and of itself a reason for a mistrial.
Furthermore, a mistrial simply means that the case would need to be prosecuted again so a mistrial would not benefit Brooks other than to further delay the inevitable.
None of that is true.
😂😂I’m sorry I’m laughing at Brooks! I mean for real though!
@@marcc4303 He isn't smart because he doesn't actually know how anything works. But it is true that he'd jump on any little thing he could. I wouldn't put it past him to have been purposely trying to make someone slip up. Or at the very least exhausted the court to the point that things went his way, which we all know didn't happen.
Did he say "if I can't face the accuser how can there be a claim" when the ACCUSERS ARE DEAD
He said he thinks the accuser is the State of Wisconsin and tried to call it to testify
@@jescan4 Technically he isn't wrong. If the state was the complainant, then he isn't wrong. The problem is... the DA works for the state, so he was facing his accuser the entire time. The DA represents the State; therefore, they ARE the State.
There are WAAAAAAAAAAAY more than 6 people hurt by him. Why does nobody bring up the other 60-something people he hit but somehow DIDN'T kill?
@@FtanmoOfEtheirys “the right to face your accusers “ In US law was out of historical reaction to secret trials where the identity of the witnesses were kept secret and the defendants were not allowed to question them. This was a common practice during the inquisition
@@iraqifoodcart8447 rhey did...
Judge: "Let's take a break and have lunch"
Brooks: "Objection."
"Grounds"
@@JbSprinkles "Mr. Brooks, pretend play time is over. It's lunch time now, so put your toys away and come eat."
He did object to a few breaks 😂
@@JbSprinkles Grounds for a coffee break?
Subject matter jurisdiction
"I disagree with that sir" perfect!
Legend has it he’s still looking for subject matter jurisdiction
His closing statement was basically him telling the Jury "COME ON GUYS!!"
Who you gonna believe me or your own eyes?, basically that was his defense the whole trial
did you notice that is joe bidens closing line too ? c'mon man....
what does joe biden have to do with anything?@@spankyharland9845
The moment I despised him the most was every time he asked the witnesses who saw their children get smashed up if it was fair to say they stood to benefit financially from the case. That was beneath disgusting.....to sit there and accuse parents whose kids sustained life-altering mental and physical trauma of benefiting financially....I hope he gets some prison justice soon.
Wow, I didn't see that. He's heartless.
@@nicolehuff8455 He's saying "you're just here for the money, aren't you?!"
@@jkdbuck7670 Also "You injuries were not that bad" - basically if you did not die everything was not bad according to DB. And saying Why were you only helping your child?" to a father who's son was smashed by his SUV
@Echidna Spikes Yet we were meant to care about his papercut and pea-sized bruise.
Oh, he is beyond APALLING!!!
The funny thing about the jury nullification was that Daryl aka alleged defendant really believed that if he inform the jury about the jury nullification, that the jury would do that.
I bet that even if there would be a law that allow the jury to send him home, that not one member of the jury would decide in his benefit, not one !!
Technically it is in the law. No Jury member has to explain his vote. So at the end the prosecution can have the best proven case in the world. If one of the jury thinks its to harsh, or really likes the defendant, (s)he can just declare "not guilty" and theres nothing a judge can do about that. As to why someone would find that P.O.S. Not Guilty no clue. I dont think he uttered a single sentence that didnt hinder his own course....
I absolutely loved it on the day of sentencing, seeing him shackled and in prison clothes looking absolutely devastated. I take no joy in the suffering of others but due his clear lack of remorse, and by his own statement saying his "Conscience is clear" in his closing statement and that he "Has no regrets". I couldn't help but feel a bit of happiness for the families finally getting SOME closure
I feel the same.
Lord forgive me...but when he mocked her and said "the Defendant" I busted out laughing. She definitely said it with an emphasis. 🤣🤣
She did but not like he said it the DEEEEEFENDENTTTTTT!!!!! Lmao 🤣 Like some kinda witch
Omg I did the same thing!!!! I replayed it like 10 times but the way he said it was funny AF 🤣 I kept laughing everytime!!
@@jen-a-purr😅😅😅 it was so funny😂😂😂
@@jen-a-purrLol I know, right? Unfortunately Brooks is a convicted murderer of the elderly men & women, and children.
He is a perfect example of someone who can say the words but has no clue to what the intent of them is.
He couldn’t even say “tacit” since he kept saying “tack-it”
He will use words he doesn’t really know. He will lie. He may even break out into dance.
I’m not sure even Amber Heards lawyers could have made him look any less guilty.
Objection, leading!
What's the lawful law though? GROUNDS!!
He wasn't going to testify because he knew Sue Opper was going to be the one to question him. AIN'T NO WAY he was going to let that happen 😅😅
When he said “Sir it’s SUStain, not SUBstain first off,” I HIT THE ROOF 😂
Dude, I took two years of paralegal school, and I wouldn't defend myself. Most lawyers wouldn't do it. You could almost hear the DA's team drooling over how easy this case was to win
Those who choose to represent themselves have a fool for a client.
His stupidity helped the DA's win!
I always wonder if a lawyer themselves would represent themselves but I honestly don’t believe it’s smart either way.
They didn't even need to do anything, lol.
I think that the evidence spoke for itself.
It's astonishing he thought ANYONE would nullify the law in his favor, when he's presented no defense case whatsoever.
Literally 0 defense. I didn’t hear anything until closing arguments where he brought up recalls that weren’t mentioned a single time in the evidentiary phase 💀
@@buddy3852
Even in his closing arguments, Brooks failed to even attempt to repudiate any of the Prosecution case. At one point it seemed that he might try to insist that he was not the driver......But even that was barely more than an inarticulate mumble.
It seems to me that Brooks has never understood anything in his life.
Well he did honk and blame God in his closing. Lol
Yup. And now he's going to enjoy a lifetime of ease and comfort in the US prison system.
"That's RIGHT sir, you've just won a LIFETIME stay in one of America's 5 star prison establishments. Here you'll enjoy 3 free restaurant style meals per day all the clean water you could ever desire, a free bed, free heat and air conditioning, free time spent outdoors, access to a free gym, AND free television, the list goes ON!!! You'll enjoy a higher standard of living then the majority of the global population, and ALL at tax payers expense. We sincerely hope you enjoy your stay with the US prison system."
I love how the judge stood up to talk to him and even crossed her arms at one point. She is firm yet professional.
WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN?? I WATCHED THE ENTIRE TRIAL!!! 99.97 percent of the trial he controlled the courtroom!! He ruled over what was said & done!!! After this CIRCUS GUARANTEE her docket will be full of IDIOTIC LOSERS claiming to be sov.cit. Seeing how much DUH-rel got by with every con gonna want the weak wishy-washy robe wearer
I literally yelled “stopped crying fool.” It made me so mad he cried and took ten min in-between each word to make an opening statement. He’s the most delusional man! Also his mug shot is terrifying.
Darrell Brooks was able to binge watch “Better Call Saul” while being incarcerated and said to himself, “that doesn’t look that hard, I can do this on my own!” 🤣🤣
That's giving Better Call Saul far too little credit. Brooks displayed CBS police procedural tier cluelessness.
yknow the master lawyer of that show, its namesake, still needed _his_ own lawyer when he was put on trial in season 3
so yeah, says a lot about the chances our friend darrell had
You know what? I actually almost admire his confidence to attempt to defend himself in a mass murder trial. It's so ridiculous, that no one has ever done it before to my knowledge. He tried so valiantly, and he failed so epically.
While lying in bed thinking about the law firm he will open after his not guilty verdict 🙄🙄🙄🙄
Judge Dorow informed Darrell Brooks, that there was 66 years of legal experience sitting at the State’s table.
He still moved forward with representing himself 🤦🏻♀️
I've never done anything to land myself in a court room, but if something ever happens where I need to go in one, I don't care what it is, I watch enough court shows and youtue stuff to know that while I may know more than some people, the one thing I do know, is that saying "a man who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer" is 100% true and I'd never set foot in there without one.
Oooooffff. I missed that. That's one easy way to scare anyone from representing themselves for sure.
That's what's "mind boggling"
I think it is wrong that one can not adequately represent themselves. The law should not be so complex that it requires 66 years of experience to know the law, yet we are supposed to live in and be judged by this system. Everyday new laws are created and non are removed. Commerce and life will become so expensive as every a thing you do requires a team of lawyers. Oh want to repost an alex johnes tweet? well thats a 1 billion dollar lawsuit for you, better call your lawyers for copyright laws, and defemation.
@@pluto8404 makes sense that your name and picture are “Pluto”, because this comment is REALLY out there. How conspiracy theorist of you to wildly claim that simple life will require lawyers, because this murderer who mowed through dozens upon dozens of people wasn’t able to properly defend himself? You honestly believe he should be able to when he is so obviously factually guilty? You’re literally insane. “oH iTlL coSt u BILLIONS!!1!11 to REwteEt!” Get outta here, kid.
I love when criminals represent themselves.
One more thing… I love that blonde haired deputy that sat behind him most of the trial. He was awesome! Kudos!
He was my favorite
@@bonniepwtf We have great taste don’t we? I thought he did a remarkable job. He never showed what he was truly thinking. Definitely my favorite too! 😊👌
@@marilynmanord1790 😊
This judge deserves a Nobel peace prize, a purple heart, and the congressional medal of honor!🏆🥇🥈🥉🏅🎖🏵🎗🎫🎟💜💜🏆🥇
Brooks: I'm not stoopid
Judge: I disagree
🤣🤣🤣
Public: Nothing can be worse than Amber herds trial…
Darrell Brooks: hold my beer
😂😂😂😅
About the same 😜
@@b.b.s7545 ehhhhh amber didn't kill people, not saying it wasn't an important trial. But if she represented herself that would've been awesome
More like hold my handcuffs
😆 😆
That jury nullification thing really hits home with me. I'm a prosecutor in a small rural county and I had a trial where a young man (21 or 22) was accused of burglary. We had it on video - he broke into the store, he shoved as much beer as he he could down his pants and carried out two more cases, but all the jury found him guilty for was petty theft. Their reasoning: He's just a young man and didn't *_need_* a felony burglary on his record. All that did was encourage him to do commit more crimes because he thought he could get away with them even if caught. Now he's in prison for 10 years after being convicted of his 5th DUI offense, so at least karma caught up to him.
The nullification bit gets me. Why would the jury be inclined to ignore all the evidence presented against him and find him not guilty? What did he show the jury to make them come to that conclusion 🤣🤣🤣
Darrell ‘I can rise and object to what I want’
The prison staff and inmates are gonna love Darrell
Hopefully he gets a nice welcoming from a group of imates that OBJECT to him !
the state of Wisconsin population in 2022 is estimated to be 5.91 million. Darrell Brooks wants them all to appear on the witness stand in the court room.... excellent way to DELAY the trial
The Coen Brothers should make a dark comedy movie out of this trial.
As long as Darrel Brooks doesn't get a dime.
Cohen? I could be wrong. Either way I agree this train wreck hauling a dumpster fire should be made into a movie.
@@Seeker0fTruth Coen, Joel & Ethan
@@shards0fwords thank you!!
As soon as I found out he thinks he's a sovereign citizen, it all made sense.
Bet he came up with that while awaiting trial. Turning over every stone to get out of this.
“I wasn’t driving, I was TRAVELLING through the crowd.”
Another innocent boat captain harassed by road pirates
Except when he thinks his Constitutional rights are being violated.
He's a blacc Supreme
Judge: "Mr. Brooks, you are not competent to represent yourself."
Brooks: "GROUNDS?"
Judge: "You misspelled 'law' on your competency exam."
lmfao
Subject matter jurisdiction?
MEGA PINTTTTT 🍷🍷🍷🍷
Objection!!
Sustained.
Er.....then I object to the objection being sustained....or something.
Probably.
Mind boggling 😂
This judge is a saint 😮
I have watched so many of these and I feel sorry for every person involved and of course the people and child killed
Asking if he’s in an admiralty court 😂😂😂… What. An. Absolute. Clown…
This judge deserves a paid vacation anywhere she desires just for dealing with him. My God the patience she had!
He fought the law and the law won🤣
lol not fought, more like flailed around impotently!
🤣🤣 The Clash! Great song.
I like how he says "for driving a red SUV into a crowd" as if the SUV was another color it would have been legal
Well you're definitely NEVER getting out of prison
Oh, he'll leave prison before too long...
A Killer of Children historically, are not well treated in prison.
You're so right. Appeal or not he'll die in prison.He better enjoy those days he'll be in court in Feb 23 because after that he will only see daylight while he's out in the prison yard for one hour a day.
I used to be in a short lived toxic relationship with someone who shares very many similarities with this man. He used to talk my ear off about being a sovereign citizen and how US laws shouldn’t apply to him. Our arguments that he would start on a daily basis definitely felt like talking to a toddler.
Good thing you left that jackass.
U peek around his family tree? Last name brooks come up maybe it’s hereditary
I’m glad you got yourself out of that situation! You deserve much better!!
opfer
They forgot to charge him for the 77th criminal charge. That rap song.
Yes, that bidness was criminal.
Actually, that is my new jam. Embarrassed to say that I became a fan of his music during these proceedings. Love his flow. I hope he continues with it. Should have time now, am I right? Looking forward to his appeal.
@@beckydoesit9331 I hope your deaf......or kidding....that would be the only excuse accepted for this comment.
Oh and he stole the beat too...he may actually get charged for it, if the copyright holder wants to be petty.
It's kind of like watching the movie Top Gun and then climbing into a Navy fighter jet - thinking that you know to fly it.
It sickens me that this man ran all those people over, especially that child he killed.
I knew he ran over the old ladies but had no idea he ran over all those other people. There is no punishment that would give the victims justice.
He ran over and injured 18 children
@@Kunfucious577 facts. There is nothing the "justice system" can do that will ease the family members pain.
Right! He is showing absolutely any empathy 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
Why especially the child? They all had an equal right to live
I think his best moment was when he asked the witness, "What else don't you remember about the statement you gave the officer?".
I think my favorite was "there can't be two counts of this crime! That's double jeopardy because I was already found guilty for the same crime somewhere else!"
First of all...not how double jeopardy works. Second of all, way to self-incriminate!!
He must think serial killers should all go free on double jeopardy. I wouldn't put it past him making the argument that he should be only be charged with a single count if it has occurred to him.
Brooks thinks he’s in a elementary school debate. “It’s NOT fair!! There’s a conspiracy!”
I would love to hear how he does in prison, where he will have no say in anything and how other inmates are will him and his arrogance.