About Object Mons
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- After going over my thoughts on object mons, I share my own based off of heat transfer.
Learn more through the links below:
Heat Radiation: • Heat Transfer - Radiat...
Other Radiation: • Is radiation dangerous...
Heat Transfer: • Heat Transfer: Crash C...
Storms (Convection): • Thunderstorms 101 | Na...
Sea Squirts (Warning, this has that one species that grow in colonies, forming many holes): • Facts: Sea Squirts (As...
Twitch ► / n0rtist
Twitter ► / n0rtist
Instagram ► / n0rtist
Patreon ► / n0rtist
#pokemon #fakemon #stem
Personally I think object mon make sense considering japan’s culture. There’s literally an entire type of yokai which are literal objects with souls and sentience. There’s actually quite a lot from curtains that will strangle you too paper walls with thousands of eyes.
I don’t think non Japanese monster catchers have a lot of object mon, but that may be my bad memory. So ya, it makes sense for all the Japanese ones.
Yep, like tsukumogami!
The only non-japanese monster catcher I can remember that has object-mons is Bágmon, which wasn't released yet, but some of the "monsters" were actually shown
For real ❤
yeah i wanna see one based off the kasa obake
So in other words... it's just Americans who expect everything in the universe to be catered to them specifically...
*Sounds about right.*
I have no problems with object mons as long as they are done well. The Tunirad line looks pretty amazing along with its concepts. I may op to go with Tuniduct as my choice.
They also make sense considering japan’s culture. There’s literally an entire type of yokai which are literal objects with souls and sentience. So object monsters make a lot of sense.
@@roboraptorwolf9726 tsukumogami. They're more akin to deserted objects, Though.
@@PhantomGato-v- I mean, technically a LOT of object mon are either like psychic or ghost, so it makes sense for old objects to become pokemon
honestly I love Object-mons, they're a reminder that the world of pokemon isn't just a world with dragons, rats with tazers and geckos with lighters, it's a magical place with all kinds of magical creatures
Like Garbage
@@jaxsonadros2066 especially like garbage
@@jaxsonadros2066 still love that mon just one day hmmmmmmmmmm garbage bag but at alive and it's evolution garage bag but ripped
Honestly, I do too. Even the one that's literally garbage.
Coin man is an exception. Coin man is the worst.
@@sirreginaldfishingtonxvii6149how? I think patrat and the elemental monkeys look way worse, or do you mean stat-wise?
Pokemon designs are so much more creative than people give credit for. Even the ones that are easy punching bags have a lot of thought put into.
My favorite example is Klefki. It’s not a keychain, it’s a fairy that steals people’s keys. Even the hole where it’s mouth would be is a keyhole and a cleft palate. Which is where “Klef” comes from.
True I wish people wouldn’t be so surface level with Pokémon designs. It’s okay to not like but don’t say it’s objectively bad if you don’t understand.
It also takes inspiration from elfs and fairies that enjoy to steal keys and shiny objects in fairy tales, hence the fairy type
i thought it was a pun on kleptomaniac
What’s the Japanese name though
🤔
@@V.U.4six Cleffy
Object mons have always been a favorite for me, I just believe that they're a bit more creative than just "dog" and "bird". Even if its just "trash bag" at least you have to go through to process of making it look alive.
The Tunirad line strays a bit away from what I'd normally consider an object mon, as theres still a lot of animalistic elements in it, I still think its very creative and well thought out! (As with all your designs lol)
Same object mons are honestly so underrated
Exactly, people really just want creature number 873 instead of cool gears?
@@dr_doritotf2305 yeah? You really think a pair of keys is more creative than making a familiar, yet ungodly creature with multiple animal influences and gimmicks with type-twists?
@@PoorEdward yes, the ability to give life and interest to an object is more impressive than mixing animals and calling it a day. There are good creature mon, but there are more good object mon
@@PoorEdward making a pair of keys look alive, cute, and giving it lore where it's a little gremlin asshole is great
In order to keep with the theme of Pyro- and Hydro- type, you could name the Ghost type Ecto-
Psychic could be nuero
psychic is neuro and ghost is necro
Would electric then be electro
Now do it for the other types heheh..
@Vent Crab no dark should be necro
The CAKE on that stringy cheese man 🔥
You could say that Gholdengo's cake is quite "rich".
i put the new forgis on the jeep
That's the entire baking industry
17.1 billion dollars worth of sheer *CAKE*
Why he standing like everyone’s so mean to him
Object mons are great because it allows for much more creativity, even when it’s simply a ghost possessing something. Not only that, the ones that we already have are great as well. One object mon that’s dear to my soul is Chandelure, which is one of the reasons why I like object mons so much! A lot of people seem to forget that Pokémon aren’t just supposed to be animals, but fictional monsters that have unique traits that define what they are!
This is a cool concept. The 2nd stage also looks like a manta ray. I really like how this line changes so drastically yet still feels related, feels on par with the Squirtle line in that aspect.
Oh my god you did NOT just draw trollface spiritomb
Aside from that absolute masterpiece of an image, object mons are super cool if done right, it’s just that the Pokémon company has been very hit-or-miss with the designs, _period,_ lately (IMO)
Some of the cooler designs are object mons: bronzong, Gholdengo (it’s a good design, Fight me), and the Aegislash line are all great examples of this (especially Aegislash. Don’t lie, Aegislash is cool and you know it)
I don't have any qualms with object mons, but I absolutely love your approach. It makes them much more interesting than "just an object" or "just an animal."
Personally, object Pokémon tend to be the designs I'm more fond of. They really help cement the idea that the series is "Pocket Monsters" and also make the collection aspect feel a little less immoral. I guess I liked the idea of being a "Magical Object Collector" rather than a "Magical Creature Poacher", even if I'm still technically the latter...
I’m glad more people recognize Pokémon are magical monsters not real world animals. So there being magic objects works.
@@andrewharris1344Honestly, some pokemon fans are just plain adult children, or whiney babies. Both of which don't think the object-mons look good. Only intellectuals enjoy pokemon in general and don't care about gameplay and design.
@FishHausemusiclab i really don't and never have understood the hate for object and food mons. is there some rule somewhere that i didn't know about saying all pokemon have to be animal like? they're creatures. plus there's always been object mons since the first gen
@@icebearlikestrains6238 people only think Pokémon should be animal like because they have no imagination
@@Rot_Dog666 r/iamverysmart
Object mon tend to be my favourite kind of mons. It's possible to mess them up, but it isn't that diferent from making boring non-object mon (like Krabby or Pidgey). I also find they tend to be significantly more inspired than non-object mon or al least I can read them better. Trubbish is one of my favourite designs, after all.
Object mon are one of my absolute favorite genres of Pokemon, with Chandelure, Revavroom, and Aegislash being just some of my favorite Pokemon, always like to see them get some more love
Same I love the mons you listed some of my favorites are.
1: vanilluxe( I love ice cream)
2. Dhelmise ( a cursed ship anchor is cool imo)
3. Garbodor( it’s solid pollution which works with muk and wheezing.
4. Klefki and polteageist (it’s cute)
5. Porygon z ( it’s not an natural animal so I think it counts).
6. Gholdengo ( broken ability and a cheerful ghost type is a nice idea.)
BRO THE THUMBNAIL
"Everyone is so mean 2 me 💔"
My favorite headcanon about most object Pokémon is that humans modelled their tools and technology off of existing Pokémon. People see a lampent or chandelure giving off light while hanging about a tree? Why not create a fancy light source that you can hang in your own home? Wow, that bronzong over there sure is making a lot of noise trying to scoop up those berries, maybe we can use a similar design to make loud noises for communication! Of course, it doesn’t work for all object pokemon like banette or polteageist, but it’s a lot of fun to think about.
i've noticed in newer gens gamefreak has taken the same approach as yours, as in, taking an object and giving it animalistic features (or viceversa). barraskewda is a torpedo, farigiraf is a telescope, turtonator is a landmine, etc. i feel like the constant objectmon backlash from the middle gens made them take this approach but at the same time its not like they stopped making "true" objectmons, which like yeah fair those will and should always be a thing. dunno where i'm going with this comment but i think its a very interesting topic and i'm wondering what their approach will be with the current design trend receiving backlash (humanoid looking mons)
I never got a telescope out of Farigaraf's design. I saw a Giraffe wearing a space suit
@@MegaPokefan97 I got a giraffe with a hoodie.
@PokefanGuquizUjixyz considering what would be a proto-space suit, was invented in Spain, space suit makes more sense
I mean that's basically what they did in most of the middle gens too. Stuff like trubbish has defined limbs and a body plan, it's just made of trash.
@@keiyakins the thing is that trubbish is just trash, whereas barraskewda is both a torpedo and a fish
Object Mons.
My favorite pokemon trope. It has even turned into my favorite creature trope. I started a worldbuilding project inspired by Pokemon where all the new creatures there are *solely* inanimate objects turned animate in an animal-like way. Stuff like an anglerfish fishing rod, a sword fish (literally), a Volkswagen beetle turned into a beetle, ringbuoy fish, a chameleon fountain pen, etc. In total, I have made *85* of these creatures as of the time of writing this post. Some of them are bit a miss, but there has been some bullseyes I'm really proud of.
Actually, your Needlish has even become a source of inspiration for one of my creatures, as me and my friend have turned a thermometer (both a digital one and a mercury one) into fish. I posted two examples of my creature designs in my community section (and in one of my tumblr blogs) an plan on posting more.
About the worldbuilding project I mentioned a couple sentences ago, it's actually an alternate timeline of our world where objects suddenly became gaining sentience in this Pokemon-esque manner where they would partially become animals, and I'm working on a story that delves into the philosophical part of that.
Feel free to ask me about anything related to this project or the creatures and I might answer.
I'm interested! The concept seems similar to that of tsukumogami in Japanese folklore, which I am decently well versed in. Please give us updates!
@Phantom Gato Thinking about it, the concept is almost like tsukumogami but on steroids. It's kinda fun to imagine how human society adapts these creatures into their everyday lives. Large sentient snake trains slithering through railroads, the youngest of children learning how to read and write using a sentient chameleon-like fountain pen, walking cameras on tripods ready to take pics of tourists for them, ringbuoy fish rushing in to save someone who fell into a river etc. Even though they all boil down to a simple "animal + thing" formula, I add a small amount of worldbuilding with each design.
something something digital type pls
btw it would be cool if you also used stuff such as concept objects that never made it to real life, i've seen a ton of concept vehicles and i'd love to see them as more animal like
@@DevilSpider_ sounds very fun!
I will admit, Gholdengo has grown a lot on me. He's just a radical dude. I don't hate his design anymore, but there's a part of me that still wants a gold monster, a Golem, Ghost Knight or huge mimic. Just something that evokes the cool factor.
Thumbnail got *huge*
"Why is everyone so mean 2 me 💔"
Energy.
I absolutely love these - Objectmon are some of my favorites so it always makes me happy to see them done well!
Tuniduct is genuinely one of my favorite fictional creatures now, not only do i love the concept and inspiration, it perfectly falls in the middle of cute and cool, which make it perfectly appealing to me. I want a plushy of him that i can swing around and hit people with
I've always loved object mon! I actually have the Sitting Cuties plushes for Klink and Litwick (and my fav Solosis but do stem cells count as object mon?) arriving to my place tomorrow! The Tunirad line is delightful, and I'm always excited to see you in the notifications
I dont think Solosis counts because it isnt a stem cell, it's a single-cell organism.
Love Tunivect a lot, I appreciate that you take a lot of inspiration from marine creatures as they're some of my favorites (though I also have a soft spot for more abstract designs similar to Bronzong and Claydol). I think Pokemon is unapologetically all over the place with its designs and that's one of its biggest strengths, there's truly something for everyone whether you like pink fluffy animals, big spiky dinosaurs, or a literal living fridge. I feel like this is where many other monster collectors fall short a bit, they stick too much to a singular theme and artistic vision, which might look consistent and pleasant aesthetically, but at the same time leaves you with little reason to get invested if that particular style just doesn't happen to be your thing.
Personally, I'm fine with object mons.
Some can feel lazy at times (Voltorb and Electrode for example as despite being the first, having limited sprite area or whatever and also being some of the first mimics to not just be a chest, they really are jud
St balls with faces), but then you get things like the Litwick line and the Beldum line. Object mons that are almost always seen as badass.
Also, I do have to ask sometimes "what else were they gonna be?" for example, Vanilluxe. When I hear people complaining about it, I just think to myself "what else was the ice cream Pokemon going to be? A wooly mammoth because ICE age?". The original version of this paragraph was much more aggressive in tone so I chilled it down and shortened it btw.
If you don't like them, that's perfectly fine, I doubt everyone is gonna start loving Garbodour after this comment, but please don't use "it's just (blank)" as an excuse for why a Pokemon is bad, because you could literally point at any Pokemon and say it's just blank. Tinkaton is just Hammer Kirby, Girantina is just Satan, Charizard is just a dragon, Eevee is just a generic mammal, Meowth is just a cat, etc.
Voltorb and Electrode are the first time in a long time that the game's treasure mimic monster is more then just a treasure chest. As bland as they are they are actually a lot more creative then people realize.
Klefki is an 2 stage mon at least, where it starts as a single key then becomes the ring. This also fits into fairies getting into the house to steal things.
Garbodour is a case of devolution. It becomes (to some, nothing wrong with liking it) repulsive and less suited for the role it was filling prior. All I was expecting was it to make sense such as handling trash better not worse.
In the case of ice cream it would make sense to be more then a cone as more complex ice creams tend to go away from that. Or if you want to stay a cone adding colored variation to it like actual ice cream has.
The issue a lot, but not all, object mons face is they are often little more then their objects in how they are presented or fail to expand on the use of the object in a meaningful way.
@@Buglin_Burger7878 well, I can't say "No, yOu'Re wRoNg" and your points are really clear, so I'm not gonna argue against you or anything. The "anger" in my original comment was more dramatised to be funnier btw, people can hate Object Mon. And as you've stated, there's a clear reason why people would not like them.
One small mistake about Klefki though, it's a single stage Pokemon, not a second stage evo. This doesn't make your critisism invalid, I just wanted to tell you before you got people who would've just been dicks about it.
The vanillite line might be closer to sentient icicles than ice cream, like I'd imagine them sticking to the ceilings of frozen caves to sleep or hife
Jokes on you I already love garbodor
@@internetlurker1850 same, although I don't hate object pokemon at all, Chandalure and Aegislash are both incredible pokemon after all
Here might be an idea for a video. Several pokemon lines will jump from species to species as their different bases for each Pokémon. It might give you a chance to talk about taxonomic Families and what it means for different species to be "related."
Aaaaaahhhh, the Tunis are definitely my favorites so far! They're so happy for just existing! I love them!
Your design are so good!
I love those designs, and I think the concept of having a literal frying pan (the thing these cool grandmas use to scare off thieves) in your party is very funny.
I love watching these videos so much, because it feeds three parts of my brain:
The artist in me: Cool designs, and looking at cool designs makes me want to make my own cool designs.
The nerd in me: Learning information about subjects I may have not been as wise to previously, delightful, chef's kiss!
The Creature Collector in me: I'm a big pokemon fan so getting the whole shebang that is these videos feeds my need for content and I'm here for it!
Moral of the story, these are great and I love watching them, thank you for sharing your ideas and thoughts with a bunch of randos on the internet, I love seeing them!
In other news:
Tuniduct looks like a little Ray even if that wasn't the intent, and I'm here for it, I would use one on my team 👀
40 seconds in and I already love the format of your videos, and really surprised at your lack of subs. Keep it up man!
Hey, I just wanted to tell you I just happened to find your channel, but I really like your videos! I hope your idea gets to become reality.
...was that a Troll-Face Spiritomb?
It was
You've, been, trolled, you've been trolled, yes you've probably been trolled-
your ideas and monster designs are great, i genuinely am excited to see you keep working on this project until it becomes reality
I always had a soft spot for objectmons, Chandelure is even one of my favourite pokémon. And these critters are pretty cool (hehe) too and have interesting concepts
Voltorb is just eyes on a ball because he’s a mimic. In jrpgs you open chests and some times they’re monsters. In Pokémon you pick up orbs and sometimes they’re monsters.
Gholdengo on the image be BALLIN' 🥶
pokemon, just like yu-gi-oh digimon and a couple other pocket monster look alikes were originally based on yokai which in a lot of cases and take the form of inanimate objects. by that rationale, object mons make just as much sense existing as animal based pokemon do.
I like that you mentioned we all have tendencies when creating things and then mentioned that pokemon has a tendency towards object mons being steel type, and your tendency for object mons ended up being fire type!
More 3 stage evolution Pokémon please! Those are so cool to me! I love your art style! Can’t wait to play this game
I love your designs man! They've got a lot of charm
That thumbnail screams "Why they so mean to me😭🍑"
this is the most interesting science class i've ever had
That GEEEEEYAAAAWWWWWWT
on that Goldengo in the thumbnail though💀💀💀
I like object mons, they imply one or two things about the pokemon world. Either the pokemon evolved to look like an object to better survive or humans saw the pokemon and made an object that resembled it. However legends arceus gives a possible third scenario that i personally think is true. Humans wanting a ball to capture pokemon in, designed it after voltorb due to them being a ball. Overtime, however, the pokeballs got more advanced and changed design, this in turn made the voltorb line evolve (in the real world sense) to match the new design. And it makes sense for them to evolve this way too as I'm sure wild pokemon avoid pokeballs, so looking like one would make your predators avoid you.
This is the first time I’ve seen you before, honestly your character design is sick.
Wow, a Fire/Ghost mon losing the Ghost type and gaining either Steel or Water, that’s certainly unique!
One year later and that thumbnail still remains THICC
object pokemon are my favorites.
especially sinistea. it has those little legs!
My headcanon is that the real world objects the object Pokémon are inspired by, are inspired by the object Pokémon in the Pokémon universe. If that makes sense. For example, klink’s design is inspired by cogs in the real world, but someone in the Pokémon universe looked at the anatomy of klink and thought “hey, that’s a very efficient design” and then made the cog.
Honestly, objectmon are my. Favorite kind of mon ever, so glad you made some!
I love to have at least one episode of this series which I understand the physics you're talking about
7:11
Well that is adorable. That tweet just gets me to hear "This is Halloween."
Thumbnail looking cheeked up
I absolutely love every one of these videos, dude. Keep it up!
People: argue about object mons
Also people: “let’s vote for a chandelier to be Unova mon of 2020.”
One Pokémon that does the "Object mixed with an animal" thing is actually a pair of Pokémon, Latias and Latios, the eon duo. They're jets, but they look alive because they have feathers, proper arms with hands and claws, and an expressive face.
I think we should focus the discussion at what makes a good object mon. There are some i love, there are some i hate. We shouldn't condemn all object mons as bad, because well... there are some that the community loves, but they just happen to be left out of the discussion, while the ones, that the community hates always come up when that toppic is brought up. I am certain, that i will look through the comments and someone will bring up garbodor as why they are bad, while there will be hardly any comments against object mons that will mention rotom or any of the gen 1s.
the tunirad line has gotta be one of my favorites so far, keep up the great videos :)
People commonly talk about route 1 mons but whatabout the cave mons, forest mons, mountain mons and other habitat series staples?
A good object-mon is always the sign I look for that Pokémon can still have fun with itself. The day we have a gen with no wacky mons of the likes of Drifloon, Trubbish, Klefki or Revaroom, that's when I'll truly worry about the state of Pokémon.
Love this video, especially realizing most of your “object” mons maybe aren’t actually. Anyways, I had some ideas for type names since you said you wanted ideas for those in a previous vid (I think). Ok, here goes:
Fairy = Fae (you might have done this one already)
Electric = Volt/Charge
Ice = Frigid/Frozen
Fighting (if it stays in the chart) = Martial
Psychic = Mystic
Ghost = Spectre/Spirit
Dark = shadow/ruin?
Steel = Metal I guess?
All just random ideas that my brain spat out, but maybe one or two of them are good.
A majority of object based Pokémon look like they were ripped straight outta MOTHER
I honestly just think they are tsukumogami, objects that gained a soul after being thrown out after years of being used or just because they have reached 100 years of age either way the object is animated but depending on how/why it gained the soul will determine its personality. The type of the pokemon is more or less the mana each living being has also its a Japanese fantasy game, it has Japanese folklore as well as other nations' folklore.
Pokemon #1000 being a pile of money is just... too perfect
Have you considered making a "radiant" type that can comprise both light and sound? since both things 'radiate' from a source? Just a suggestion.
radio-?
@@Barriertriostruckapose that can work too. Maybe nortist will think so too.😁
Object mons are one of my favorite Pokemons, that I always tried to have one in my team in every game
The way I see it, objectmons in-universe are the basis for those objects in their world (with some exceptions). ex. Vanilluxe isn't based on ice cream; ice cream's invention was inspired by Vanilluxe. The same logic can even be applied to Pokemon saying their own names; language and the meaning of words evolved based on the noises Pokemon make.
Another thing people don't realize that there is a lot of hidden meaning behind these designs, some of these designs are based on folklore which I really like. ☺️💖
You could also have an induction based evolution for it. Possibly a rock/steel plus fire type
Okay but the potion spray bottle is iconic
LITWICK IS PROOF OBJECT MONS ARE COOL
Fax the whole line is awesome
Litwick is my favorite Pokemon of all time
Though every single Object Mon is cool
It's my favorite type of Pokemon
I will absolutely be finding a kettle if/when the game is released. They look so adorable!
this thumbnail is INSANE
source???
Great art can't wait for the pseudo legendary.
"Spectre" would be a nice replacement name for your ghost types
I did not expect "object mon" to mean pokemon who look like objects. I expected this to be some weird educational video about something scientific but i am not even dissapointed tbh.
Heavily invested in sruff like this now, thanks
Wow I just learnt about conduction, radiation and convection in school a month or two ago!
Hope you make a acids and alkali mons so I can learn about those a little too! Maybe they can have abilities that change they types of other Pokemon? Like blue litmus and red litmus paper? Not sure but just throwing out ideas
There are some of them i really like, even at best, Who are really elaborated, solid concepts.
The thumbnails all give vibes of 'hey guys come check out my pokemon OC' and then the video goes 'syke here's a video about thermal dynamics'
He knows what he's doing with these thumbnails
I remember hearing object mons were based on the idea of objects gaining spirits on their own for exisitng a certain amount of time, like those parasols with a foot and an eye in some Japanese art
A Pterophyllum scalare as the psuedo legendary makes me happy. Will it have any relation with the recent studies of numerosity and Pterophyllum scalare?
most rock type Pokemon are just straight up FUCKING ROCKS, like, LITERAL ROCKS
Honestly, the fact that people don't make a huge deal about Magnemite and Voltorb, or for that matter even some later objectmons like Nosepass and the cosmic rocks, makes me think that most people complaining are really just using the "objectmons are bad" argument as yet another thinly veiled way to bash later gens.
Personally, I'm mixed on objectmons. I like them when there's unique lore attached, like how Cryogonal is basically a frozen gestault colony of cyanobacteria functioning similarly to a Portuguese Man-O-War, or how Klefki is based on European fairies that steal your keys for shits and giggles. And for some reason I also like the Klink line. I'm not a fan of ones that exist because "we have to have an objectmon for this generation's 'dex", though.
Bro the potion kind of does look like a Pokemon can't even lie dawg
Absolutely love the lill tunicate guys
I personally think that Tunivect should have a signature ability that changes its type and form if hit by a fire type move or a hot move like scald or steam eruption. Turning it from a pure water type to a water/fire type. As if it gets heated up instead of taking damage.
I am loving this series
Object mons are mad underrated. They're some of my favorites along with plant-based mons too. Fans are under the wrong impression that Pokemon are all animals, especially when Gen 1 had a good amount. It allows for even more creativity so I believe these should be more of a thing in the series. You can still make cute and epic designs out of them so folks really shouldnt complain about them
dam that cheese tree dude really be puttin' the new forgis on the jeep
Your videos and creativity are amazing keep up the hard work
In general, I feel like Object Mons are fine if they have a decent enough in-universe explanation, or if they _don't_ then at the very least the in-universe characters express the same amount of confusion and/or curiosity as the player/viewer might have about the origins of such Mons in the first place, and IIRC we've seen a decent amount of both of these approaches in Pokemon.
Slightly different from 'mon-collecting games, but the best example I can think of off the top of my head is from the manga series Dungeon Meshi, which actually had a pretty interesting take on the concept of your classic treasure chest mimic monster by making them essentially _gigantic land hermit crabs_ that use discarded pieces of armor, cookware, jugs, barrels, and ultimately large treasure chests as shells. In the same volume, the main characters also discover "treasure bugs", which were a species of beetle that had evolved to look like gold coins and jewels to they'd look unappealing to the species of monster that would normally eat them. (It was also an in-universe method for them to spread to new areas, as being mistaken for treasure and picked up by unaware adventurers means they get a free ride to the relative safety of the adventurer's hometown.)
I'm not sure why they'd express confusion when these creatures have always been a part of this world and half of them can power a city block on their own
Actually in a lot of cases lore wise the mons predate whatever thing they're based on
Just like how in real life we base things in animals all the time
@@Gamebuilder2000 Yeah, reading my original comment back I can see I probably could have worded it a bit clearer, so that's entirely on me.
To (hopefully) clarify, I'm mostly going on the logic that BECAUSE these Pokemon have been around so long as you said, they don't bear much discussion for folks who are in-the-know about them, so people who AREN'T in the know (such as those who live in small towns with only your typical natural-looking Pokemon like Pidgey and Caterpie) would be caught off-guard by object 'Mons.
It's very much in the same vein as a person in the real world seeing a pangolin or sarcastic fringehead for the first time. The first one might inspire mild surprise and maybe a soft "aaawww~", but the latter will almost always garner a "wtf is that thing and why does it LOOK like that and how do I ensure I never have to be near it in real life" response.
(I hope this made my thoughts about that a bit clearer. Sorry if I failed! 😅)
I love revavroom, but i wish that the rocky wheel-things didnt look they way they did. I'd love to stick one onto one of those Little Tykes toy cars.
loved the objectmons featured in this vid. Even cooler that they are based on deep-sea critters too!
I hope this becomes an actual fangame
Having grown up with gen 1, I can say with absolute certainty that many people didn't like Voltorb and Electrode for their "PokeBall with eyes" design. Magnemite didn't get much flack, but with everyone hating on Voltorb's and Grimer's evolution lines there wasn't much flack to spare for the floating magnet.
The troll face spiritomb oh my god
I like when the object mons are possessed objects like Dhelmise, or evolving into mimicry like Drifloon and Klefki
Yo your Squidward SaturnHead avatar is sick!
A sunfish pseudo legendary would be really cool. Would it be water type, or another thing typing?