We got the new TST Intake on our 2025 MT-07 for testing, and it's awesome!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- Our Mail In ECU Flashing Service for these bikes is available for $349.99 at 2WDW.com!
If you have any questions, please feel free to email us at support@2wheeldynoworks.com. We are always happy to help!
Just sent my ECU in for you all to reflash. I'm stoked!!!
Im sending mine next week!
Fantastic there's another developer offering airbox for the -07.
Have you been able to Dyno a 2025 cbr1000rr. Not fireblade
I just did the Black Widow 200mm but I can not find an intake for my 2023 MT07. I will be sending the ECU out to you very soon!
How do you like the exhaust? I'm stuck between the 200mm and 230mm options 😅
@@proxyhx2075 It's nice! has a good sound and is still pretty loud with the baffle in.
Can I buy the air filter and a black widow and install it with out the ECU thing?
Isn't it possible to modify the torque curve by increasing it in an increasing manner up to 10 thousand rpm? even at the expense of low revs?
Hi Nate,
Will you also execute a test with a Tenere 700 and a GYTR air box?
Has there been any intakes made for the transalp 750? I remember you saying you were expecting some aftermarket intakes to be made for it
Interesting little divot in torque and power around 8100 rpm on all the Dyno charts; any idea what might be the cause? I imagine it's not noticeable to the rider.
You're right, that is weird
It's essentially just "static" in the winpep7 data stream. If we further increase the smoothing of the graph, it disappears, but then you also lose resolution.
In this case, it's nothing.
What’s the dip around 8K rpm ?.
It's essentially just "static" in the winpep7 data stream. If we further increase the smoothing of the graph, it disappears, but then you also lose resolution.
In this case, it's nothing.
I don't want an air filter where I can see through two sides of the "filter" material.
I'd be worried that the motor is going to be eating sand.
that's why its a prototype its not finished, its just for fitment reasons as stated in the video
@@AlphaDLimafirst of all that’s not what Nate said at all. He said that the production box would be made of carbon fiber but the performance would be the same. In order for the performance to be the same then the filter itself would have to be the same.
@@davidleonard8369 0:15 He legit says it’s a prototype and they sent it over for fitment testing lmao
@@davidleonard8369and the material doesn’t need to be the same at all to have the same exact performance, the k&n filter has different material than the stock intake on an mt07 and I asked him personally if that would make a difference and he says not at all.
@ duh! He also said that the only thing different from the production model is the material the box will be made from. Yes he said that it was sent to him to test fitment but he also said that performance would be the same as the production model. Maybe you don’t understand how airflow affects performance but in essence Nate meant that the actual filter media and its dimensions would be the same because if the production model is made Any different then the performance would be different making these tests virtually useless.
Why not something like the old days with carbs , velocity stacks and K@N filter for each ? Something like the old GS1000 and KZ10000 1980`s superbikes . Think a airbox with that much cut out is more of a filter holder ?!
Carbonsmith does that(3D printed v-stacks with MWR filter).
Pod filters?
It's been tried and proven that intake flow efficiency is significantly better with an enclosed frequency chamber where the soundwave pulse traveling back and forth from the intake valve to the airbox has something to pressurize against, and the pulse frequency timing can be tuned for a specific RPM range where you intend to maximize flow efficiency through the throttlebodies.
The principle is exactly the same as an exhaust system. For example, think of a two-stroke engine, where the expansion chamber location in the exhaust system has an effect in timing relative to engine RPM to affect cylinder gas flow. Without the chamber, there's no inversion-pulse return. An airbox is similar.
@@exothermal.sprocketbingo.
@@exothermal.sprocket That pulse is not the speed of sound in the intake, it is a pressure wave(pulse) caused by the air to piling behind the intake valve when it closes ( intake velocity 350mph or higher to 0 mph ) causing the pressure to spike up through the intake runner back into the airbox causing the air pressure to rise just in time for the next intake opening in different cylinder. Exhaust measurement is sound (MACH 1). The intake and exhaust pulse wave forms are totally different. Think: spike(exhaust pulse mach1 ) vs ocean wave(intake: is dynamic everything changes with engine speed, amplitude changes with frequency). with 540 degrees between firings volume is your friend and intake signal is negligible. PITOT tube time ?
PS: ProStock 500 CID 2 valve 10,000 rpm is about 450 mph intake runner speed. Exhaust: MACH 1 is also a choke, pushing faster destroys engines.
@ I'm aware in exhaust systems there are separate waves. I know intake systems operate on similar principles, hence airbox and length-tuned velocity stacks and so forth. There's a lot of optimization that can be done to a naturally aspirated system before you'd turn to forced induction for additional power. Honestly I wish variable valve timing was becoming more common in motorcycle engines than it currently is.
Crazy that it’s taken this long for someone to catch up to the horsepower system
I think I’m gonna get this airbox. The Yoshimura airbox I have is just not cutting it🥲