BBF Ford 557 Start to Finish Build with Kaase SR-71 Heads

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 дек 2024

Комментарии • 91

  • @overtimeracing9367
    @overtimeracing9367 8 месяцев назад +4

    Very nice build, im a big block ford guy myself. Nice to see some people still running this ole engines

    • @lessummers5738
      @lessummers5738 28 дней назад

      What does short block and long block mean if I can ask? Im new to everything but like this kind of stuff lol

    • @420dabzzz
      @420dabzzz 11 дней назад +1

      Putn 1 n a 86 tbird

  • @zAvAvAz
    @zAvAvAz 8 месяцев назад +3

    Hey check your oil pump for cracks, noticed the stem type on it. Get a Kaase oil pump with the thick flat mounting stem. The stock type are prone to cracking, and a 557 deserves the insurance. You got Kaase heads so use the good Kaase oil pump.

  • @FINfinFINfinFINfin
    @FINfinFINfinFINfin 7 месяцев назад +2

    Badass build! I have four Glastron Carlson 460 BBF jet boats in the barn to restore. I'm 30 minutes from Kaase's shop, so at least one of the builds will get some sweet Kaase parts.

  • @tomnekuda3818
    @tomnekuda3818 Год назад +2

    I have built several 460 Ford engines and really enjoy making these engines perform. The parts in the baby are the best around and I wish I would have had some of it for my builds.

  • @ricknorrington2211
    @ricknorrington2211 Год назад +3

    Bad ass
    Can’t wait for more videos!! Was really eyeing the P-51 or SR-71’s for my 72 mustang
    Thanks for sharing!!👍👍👍🏁🏁

  • @sfcrashley
    @sfcrashley Год назад +4

    Great video, and thanks. Try to stay hot on your builds/videos. I remember shutting down that track on a similar build around 2004. "D9" sounds like a 1979 block? Mine was a D0VE, thus a 1970 block. I also believe there is more power to be found through timing and jetting, or maybe shift points/converter. Your tune now is easily north over 880 hp, and about 750 torque.

  • @getouttheguns8179
    @getouttheguns8179 Год назад +2

    Good video deserves a sub, built a similar engine a few years ago with A heads instead did well,

  • @edsmachine93
    @edsmachine93 Год назад +6

    Nice Build Ron.
    Very impressive build.
    Thanks for sharing.
    Take care, Em.

  • @drcolster
    @drcolster Год назад +2

    Great Result, nice clean work...and later on you can do more head work,etc... go faster....

  • @lorenzomunoz325
    @lorenzomunoz325 Год назад +2

    The only thing that worries me is the engine stand brother. Amazing build! Got forbid that engine stand tips over

  • @danonoveh8114
    @danonoveh8114 Год назад +5

    Super nice engine , that should make some serious reliable horsepower forsure, Good Luck dude💯💯💯👍🏻😉

  • @brentgrimes5353
    @brentgrimes5353 Год назад +1

    Nice build. D9=79. I prefer a rear sump pan. Torque seems to pull the oil away from the pickup on front sump pan. Good luck. Have fun

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад +2

      Thanks Brent, I appreciate it. D9 was the casting number on blocks made from 1979-1997. I would like to use a rear sump pan, but stock chassis requires front sump.

    • @brentgrimes5353
      @brentgrimes5353 Год назад

      @@Ronthegearguy E9=1997

    • @brentgrimes5353
      @brentgrimes5353 Год назад +1

      @Ronthegearguy still great build my friend

    • @brentgrimes5353
      @brentgrimes5353 Год назад +1

      @@Ronthegearguy I'm thinking you should be over 900 horse power

    • @brentgrimes5353
      @brentgrimes5353 Год назад +1

      @@Ronthegearguy 1000hp 800fpt

  • @KMAC-45
    @KMAC-45 Год назад +2

    Awesome build long ways from Mr.Shestags shop class and shaving pistons on small engines 😂

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад +2

      That was so much fun! Where it all began....lol

  • @hildablanco1591
    @hildablanco1591 Год назад +1

    Always get Ross pistons and Hastings piston rings and titanium valve's for endurance and steel valve guides

  • @slowstang88
    @slowstang88 Месяц назад

    Should smooth out the casting flash on the valley drain back holes

  • @michaelparadisis4076
    @michaelparadisis4076 Год назад +3

    Beautiful motor. Didn’t dyno the engine ?? Should produce 800hp/720 ft/lbs no problem.

  • @rodneytxps
    @rodneytxps Год назад +4

    Nice build. I am currently working on a 545. Do you recall the head stud part number?

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад +3

      Thank you sir. Head studs Arp PN: 255-4301

  • @davidreed6070
    @davidreed6070 Год назад +2

    The ports done by Daren Morgan. They will make Big power

  • @matthewmanning9578
    @matthewmanning9578 4 месяца назад

    I'm building a 557 now with the SRr-71s for a street rod. Wonder if I could use all the parts, you did minus cam. I'm looking to be able to stay on 93 pump gas so 14:1 compression may be a little too high for my needs.

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  4 месяца назад +1

      @matthewmanning9578 Yes, for a street car on pump gas, you will want less cam and less compression.

  • @jeffreyjohn2037
    @jeffreyjohn2037 Год назад +1

    Kasse makes a super duty oil pump. You should've installed one.

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад +1

      I haven't had any issues with the stock pumps

    • @jeffreyjohn2037
      @jeffreyjohn2037 Год назад

      @@Ronthegearguy I heard about the bolt flanges breaking on the stock pump. Look up the Kasse part. It's a beefed up design.

  • @johnduncanjr186
    @johnduncanjr186 Год назад +1

    I love this build. With out getting into exact figures, what is a ball park figure to duplicate this build? I am very interested in doing one I just checking to see if it might be with in my means.thanks for the video.

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад

      Thanks for the kind words! I haven't added it all up, but somewhere in the 10-12k range.

    • @johnduncanjr186
      @johnduncanjr186 Год назад +1

      @@Ronthegearguy Thanks bro that’s kind of what I thought. 10-15 so yeah I got to get a side hustle first lol thanks again.

  • @dalebohannon6032
    @dalebohannon6032 Год назад +1

    where did you find that mafia intake ? we have been looking for one for over 2 years\

  • @connorharris1629
    @connorharris1629 Год назад +2

    What was the mph on the pass and what does car weigh? Awesome build, love to see it.

  • @22highlight
    @22highlight 10 месяцев назад +1

    Appreciate it man!!

  • @pvsheridan
    @pvsheridan Год назад +2

    Hello Ron: Mid-9s on a 9" tire? Leaf spring suspension? Wow! Question: The spring spec for 0.800 lift cam, is that nominal? You mentioned that cam gross lift was 0.780ish. A little tight, or is spring bind near 0.900ish? Thanks for video Ron.

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад

      Thanks for the kind words! The springs are good for .800 lift with an extra .060 clearance before coil bind. You just wouldn't want to go more than .800 lift. Thanks!

  • @T100kg
    @T100kg 8 месяцев назад

    Why did you not use Fords no jacket new block and go with 4.5 inch bore and make a Chevy eater with 4.5 x 4.5 bore and stroke?

  • @biscuitboy3617
    @biscuitboy3617 Год назад +3

    Just a question....was your rotating assembly internally, or externally balanced?

  • @22highlight
    @22highlight 10 месяцев назад +1

    What lifters were used in this build

  • @T100kg
    @T100kg 8 месяцев назад

    You Can buy a bigger one complete from Ford Crate. 4,5 x4.5 all forged 10 . 5 pump gas or blow it complete motor 19 Grand with a warranty

  • @T100kg
    @T100kg 8 месяцев назад

    And use Aluminum super stock heads Ford sells it complete in a Crate that makes 655 hp on pump gas

  • @Hjfvvdst
    @Hjfvvdst Год назад +1

    Why 21 thou on top and 24 on second ring?

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад +2

      Hi, the ring manufacturer recommends using more gap on the second ring to prevent pressure buildup behind the top ring which causes ring flutter.

    • @Hjfvvdst
      @Hjfvvdst Год назад +2

      @@Ronthegearguy oh that makes real good sense.
      Thank you for the education.

    • @cavscout62
      @cavscout62 Год назад +3

      I am really into your assembly here and also very interested in how, where and how much power it makes. Beautiful Work BTW. I was really hoping to see it Injected instead of carb fed but I’m sure you have a reason for that. Fantastic looking engine Man!

  • @quackers9999
    @quackers9999 Год назад

    What size intake valve?

  • @randybichsel4597
    @randybichsel4597 Год назад +12

    Crank girdles are a waste of money, its not a chevy

    • @Comet-hn3gm
      @Comet-hn3gm Год назад +4

      Can't hurt. At least the crank will probably stay close to the block if it tries coming out.

    • @David-er1cy
      @David-er1cy Год назад

      If the ford made 4 bolt mains and steel cranks they woukdnt need all that , 2 bolt main nodular crank is def not factory high performance

    • @markmccarty9793
      @markmccarty9793 Год назад +2

      It's cheap insurance! I don't plan to die in the next year, but I have life insurance!😂😂😂

    • @steveharper9964
      @steveharper9964 Год назад

      What good does it do without any extra bolts?

    • @randybichsel4597
      @randybichsel4597 Год назад +6

      @@David-er1cy I've used 2 bolt blocks with cast cranks shifted them in the 7500 rpm range never hurt one my old engine was 460 cast crank stroked to 4 inch with 6.535 BBC h beam rods 2 bolt block saw 7500 every pass even hit 8500 a few times ran it for 10 years never a problem

  • @68nitrostang
    @68nitrostang Год назад

    What did the car run ?

  • @gdaytrees4728
    @gdaytrees4728 Год назад +3

    Very nice, dude. Too bad it has that front sump. Under hard acceleration (which is definitely going to happen), the oil will slosh back and away from the oil pickup. Spun bearings are common with this problem. Sorry about that. Makes me sad to know how much work you put in to be faced with that.

    • @Iseestupidpeopleeveryday
      @Iseestupidpeopleeveryday Год назад +5

      They ran these motors back in the 70s in super stock. You put a 3 quart accumulator on the floor and that thing will run 7500 all day long with the wheels in the air and not have an oil pressure problem.

  • @captjim007
    @captjim007 Год назад +1

    Making about 750hp

  • @DethFromAbove1985
    @DethFromAbove1985 8 месяцев назад

    Like to see that in a 69 mustang!!! 🤪

  • @randymcguire731
    @randymcguire731 3 месяца назад

    D9 is 1979

  • @elainestamper3873
    @elainestamper3873 Год назад +2

    D9 would be 79

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад +1

      Yes, Ford used the D9 block casting number from 1979 to 1997.

  • @raginroadrunner
    @raginroadrunner 10 месяцев назад

    If Ford would not have been so CHEAP they would have designed these with a 4 bolt main. Cap shift is a huge problem.

  • @raginroadrunner
    @raginroadrunner 10 месяцев назад

    I have been building these engines for over 35 years. They will not produce the power that a 454 Chev will make. And that drives me crazy.

  • @dexter2433
    @dexter2433 Год назад

    but ford never made a big block or small block and in face for has have many block designations but never a big or small block as ford has had many classifications but none be smaller and bigger than any other classification

    • @shelbyduprey6189
      @shelbyduprey6189 Год назад +2

      Technically it is a big block. Even John Kaase calls it a big block. Maybe you should tell John Kaase he is wrong, I'm sure he'd love for you to enlighten him with your great knowledge of Ford blocks hahaha

    • @rakemuhammad
      @rakemuhammad Год назад

      what?

  • @rickh633
    @rickh633 Год назад +1

    Why wouldn't you use a460 heads? Kaase are nice but a460heads are a step up.

    • @Ronthegearguy
      @Ronthegearguy  Год назад

      I would, but my car has a stock engine compartment. The valve covers would probably hit the shock towers, lol. The sr71 heads are the best factory style heads