I played in First Saturday IM tournaments in 2011 for 3 months and can tell you that in my experience the tournaments were totally on the level. I got to know the organizer Laszlo Nagy and saw that he was a very professional and friendly person who took great pride in his tournaments. Although I was playing in the IM norm tournaments I had no interest in any IM norms-I just wanted to get my Fide Master title as I was an older player who was not strong enough to have a realistic shot at making IM and getting my Fide master title was my last goal in chess. I played 3 tournaments and never experienced anything shady. In the last round of my 3rd tournament one of my opponents approached me and said he had a family member in the hospital and could we just play a quick draw. Neither of us was in contention for any norm opportunities (my opponent was rated around 2250 if I remember and I was a bit over 2300). I agreed and we just played 15-20 theory moves and shook hands. When Laszlo saw the game he was annoyed and said that he doesn't like games like that in his tournament as they are bad for his tournament's reputation. I didn't know that what I was doing would bother him and I just agreed because I would have felt like a jerk forcing my opponent to play when he was telling me that he wanted to be with a hospitalized family member.
This is why I don't necessarily have a issue with this especially in the last round if the players want to they can just play a Berlin and that is a draw offer in and of itself that ends in that many moves, but also I think a game or two like this in the last round for example is acceptable but if it's every round it becomes a problem
I remember a certain Fischer back in the 60's talking about similar things happen, but he's been called a lunatic while in fact he could have been right at the time.
Fischer (and Larsen) talked about fixed results between the Soviet players - usually draws as to spare energy. They did not talk about manipulated norms.
Not the most popular chess player nowadays, but Karjakin was inches away from world classical champion over the greatest player ever. He was one of those tilt proof players, shown in his 3 consecutive candidates, nearly winning all 3. Id say Carlsen's main rival in 2010s even though others would say Fabi or Anand.
@@seya_2 Imo Fabi is the clear #2 player of the Carlsen era, but Karjakin is definitely up there. He would be in contention for the greatest Candidates Tournament player of all time if not for Nepo.
Hey Thanks for making this video and referencing my article. Would have appreciated if you quoted it as a source below the video description, tho? Think it is a good practice for any sources used in any case.
Cheating has been going on for a long time. The Soviets were notorious for gaining quick draws against one another to conserve their energy for non-Soviet GMs. And look at the corruptions of Campomanes and his Soviet handlers, and the Karpov v Korchnoi match which was jam-packed with Soviet shenanigans.
There are many levels of favouring. Indian top players get an insane amount of money compared to other nations, thus giving them an advantage, since they can focus more on the games, and less on financial stability.
@@MorningNapalm but there's nothing wrong in that. Indian sports has a history of suffering due to lack of funds. Far back in the 60s, the indian football team was the only one in Asia to qualify outright for the FIFA world championships, but they squandered the opportunity because the govt failed to generate enough funds for their travel abroad. This moment is regarded as the death of Indian football, as then cricket would become more popular, and football takes backstage. If other countries wanted, they could supply their chess players with funds as well. There is also not a lot of sports india does excellent in, internationally, except cricket, chess, some tennis, complex bow archery, javelin throw and a few others
@@kennethkilian1971 It isn't against the current rules, but it results in proportionally more Indian players, for what it is worth. I wish the financial support of chess players would be regulated, to level the playing field.
@@MorningNapalm not at all. Why should it be regulated. If a country doesnt want to support its players, thats the countries problem. Why should other countries that are willing to fund suffer?
Make no mistake, GM Sergey Karjakin may have gotten his initial title with slightly shady doings, if you believe in the rumors, and you probably don't agree with his pro-Putin stance, but he's a legitimate super GM.
There are women titles, so it's easier for women to gain them and compete in rated tournaments - which are those women tournaments. A big misunderstanding that many people have here is, that woman are not allowed to compete with men. That is not true. If a woman gains the norms and elo, they can gain the same titles as everyone else & compete in all the tournaments. The woman titles and tournaments was a way by FIDE to integrate woman more/makes it easier for them to compete in "higher level" tournaments.
@@waltlock8805 I'm not saying it as cheating. But if match fixing occurs in these tournaments for making it easier for them to achieve norms, it is a serious issue.
I think you brought up many good points and speculations in this video, however most of the sources was from Reddit which questions the legitimacy and validity of your claim.
@@dannygjk Yes it is? I think you may be refering to the rule in norm tournaments that require a specific amount of titled players, with candidate master not being counted
@@YesPlatinum The lowest titled player is FIDE master. Maybe you are thinking of national master example USCF national master but they are not titled players.
Match fixing sadly is not considered cheating by many players and even trainers. The barrier of proof required from arbiters is insane. This doesn't help our sport at all.
I don't know about some of these stories...an anonymous reddit user? The supposed words of someone who had already died? And of course, short draws do exist.
44 seconds in and you say that levy rozman is a GM, which is not a true, and that makes your video loses any credibility it may have, i'm not even watching it because it's not a fluke, it shows you've no idea what you're talking about.
UPDATE: After looking around, several online chess stores have a reproduction of this piece design listed as "Romanian Hungarian Set". I bought the ones from ChessNBoards and I love them. 3.8 inch king. Nice weight and finish.
This is an example of Kramnikism (or Magnusism?) - a highly speculative and almost malicious video, based on hearsay, bad interpretations, and misinformation. For starters, agreeing to draws beforehand is not illegal nor shady; they also don’t imply that something is to be gained from making those draws. For a reason, they are called "grandmaster draws", and although not illegal per se, they are not very welcomed in elite tournaments because they are public events, and spectators pay to watch the fight. This led to the introduction of stipulations like the "Sofia Rules" - where draws are not allowed in less than 30 moves. However, in tournaments not played for the public, such as those for qualifying purposes, rating gains, or title pursuits, making quick draws with jaded old grandmasters becomes a strategy - they are there for the payment, so a draw means a 20-minute workday for them, but they can pounce if you want to battle. Second, First Saturdays truly is a point of pilgrimage for newly made grandmasters. Like everything, some titles may have been "intervened", not because the Organizer fixes it, but perhaps due to low-effort players who want to gain a title as if paying for an online course certificate, analyzing their games with engines on. Cheating, if done well, will always exist, and little can be done about it. That doesn’t mean that everyone cheats. Also, you pointing out the Hungarian Grandmasters playing the same tournament? They are locals -and it's their dream job! It's like going to work at the Starbucks in the corner, but with your brain. To add to the previous point, the best player ever known to have gotten Grandmaster norms at the First Saturdays tournaments is none other than Fabiano Caruana. I bet you can't accuse him of cheating. Look how it turned out. Also, everyone worth their salt in chess knows that the kid Mishra is a monster, and this is not a line that will be written only once. Just take a look at his games, without engines first. Follow his example. Karjakin: I have no idea about Karjakin, but it's difficult to argue with the results. However, chess cheating in Russia, or better said, collusion in Russia, is a documented issue that dates from the very first international tournament where Botvinnik got the title. It was done to advance one of their own, only among themselves. Still shady, so who knows. Nemsko: You forgot to mention that her title is WGM (Woman Grandmaster), which is a lower title requiring only a 2300 rating. For the same reason, that could be why the games have a low move count issue. Norms: Explained poorly. You forgot to mention that the minimum rating required by FIDE for GM norms is 2380, so it’s not a crime to have a 2390 average in a tournament, as it's designed this way for organizers. Still, the player has to prove their worth by getting a rating over 2500. It’s not a cheating issue; it's a rule issue. Do they have to raise it? I don’t know. Perhaps it's better to create another title, like a SGM. A Grandmaster title now doesn’t mean much in a world of 2600s and 2700s. And as per your examples, where you get a livelihood commenting on games... This guy Levy is not a GM. Lastly, the use of "some say" in your narrative is the laziest way to accuse somebody of something. Haven’t you learned anything from the Hans Niemann affair? Those accusations with specific names and without definitive proof that would not hold in court are ripe for a juicy lawsuit. It’s actually good that this video has little to no views. I would sue you just for the clickbait: Came for the clickbait, stayed for the rage. PS: Still waiting for you to mention the name of the world champion who cheated his title.
I am only a recreational player, usually and almost exclusively against the computer games such as Sparkschess. I do doubt their ratings but who am I. For example they rate Boris at 1800 but I must be 100 because I have never beat him. Hmmm….thus I am suspicious of all ratings based games.
Agreeing to a draw before you even play might not be cheating in your world, but I suggest that these draws undermine the spirit of competition. This diminishes the reputation of both opponents and is why I a sport such as baseball or hockey we have extra innings or overtime in the playoffs. Rigged draws is unacceptable. An honorable opponent would walk away. Chess must be an example of intellectual integrity.
getting youngest gm title doesnt guarantee sponsorship. i know abhi mishra and his dad a bit, allegedly corporate sponsors in US were not interested. that being said would be surprised if aid was zero as travel coaching expenses a few hundred K$ per year
@@MorningNapalm not in the normal usage of game vs match. Generically yes of course everything is a match but then why even use the word match even if two people play each other 12 times for a prize?
Women in chess often don’t feel safe due to the men being super creepy and sexist and even if they report it, if it’s a male titled player it’ll be swept under the rug immediately without investigating
I personally think, that norm factories are a good thing for the sport. A GM title is super hard to get either way, and doesnt offer many benefits despite being flown in and paid for closed tournaments . For some GMs who got their title legitimate, its the only way to support themselves as coaching chess does often not pay nearly enough. If someone wants to pay hundreds of thousands to get a GM title but cant stay above 2400 elo points consistently in real games, let them. Most people that play chess, if they see a gm who peaked at 2500 once when they got the title and then straight went back to 2100 know whats up anyways
I feel both sides to this. Getting a grandmaster title is already way too rigged and difficult as is, the fact that there are more people with Doctoral degrees than grandmasters says it all. If anything it should be made a little easier for people to get titles and norms. I think the better way to handle this is to make sure that the round robin norm tournaments happen in an environment where everyone can see, not making it so that the norms have to be done on a swiss. I personally hate a lot of aspects in the swiss system and would much prefer sectioned round robins and winners advancing to the next round robin in a pool of the same number of players and so on. I personally prefer the Round Robin format because all pairings are predetermined beforehand and everything is on a set schedule and the next pairings don't have to be determined each and every time.
2nd: 10:55 What's your opinion of Armageddon w/ auction, even in classical? --- Well Bobby Fischer was preaching about pre-arrangement but I don't think increments & 9LX are enough to solve this. I think we have to look to xiangqi where their armageddon has auction and was invented by a player named Ronghua Hu known as - surprise surprise - the Bobby Fischer of Xiangqi! So I think bobby would like Armageddon (w/ auction) w/c makes every game fair & decisive. - Plus in particular, bids for black in 9LX go like 12min/15min while in chess they're like 9min/15min since 9LX doesn't have as many draws or as much white advantage (except in computers). --- Armageddon w/ auction makes every game fair & decisive. I believe this'd mean - A - no more draws but in a good way not in a no stalemate way. And a fortiori no pre-arranged draws - B - no more rapid tiebreaks. You can play chess w/o Armageddon and then settle classical matches w/ classical tiebreaks - C - Can have best-of-1 knockouts - D - All single round robins & single swiss are fair. - E - There's no more issue of drawing a best-of-4 by compensating for a white loss with a white win & 2 black draws like in 2016 & 2023 classical wcc's where Sergey & Nepo had more black wins than Magnus & Liren. I notice these 3 improvements of Bobby - 9LX - Increment - Armageddon (w/ auction) Are used more in rapid than classical but they should be used more in classical!
u know most of games when a 2500-2600 players play against eachother end in a draw and most of them arent even pre arranged draws so u want to grab an equal game and force a player to win it? this obviouly would increase the number of wins with black not because of good play but because white will eventually need to go wild as a draw is the same as a loss. Plus, lots of players whether amateur or pros have a solid playstyle which would suck as white in ur format
@@Gustavo-xe4op thanks for sharing. 1- if they have solid playstyle that would suck as white, then they shouldn't have a problem bidding much lower for black then? 2- is classical 9LX armageddon w/ auction better than classical chess armageddon w/ auction? i figure 9LX has little theory, white advantage & draws so they might bid 60min vs 45min instead of 60min vs maybe 15min
I played in First Saturday IM tournaments in 2011 for 3 months and can tell you that in my experience the tournaments were totally on the level. I got to know the organizer Laszlo Nagy and saw that he was a very professional and friendly person who took great pride in his tournaments. Although I was playing in the IM norm tournaments I had no interest in any IM norms-I just wanted to get my Fide Master title as I was an older player who was not strong enough to have a realistic shot at making IM and getting my Fide master title was my last goal in chess.
I played 3 tournaments and never experienced anything shady. In the last round of my 3rd tournament one of my opponents approached me and said he had a family member in the hospital and could we just play a quick draw. Neither of us was in contention for any norm opportunities (my opponent was rated around 2250 if I remember and I was a bit over 2300). I agreed and we just played 15-20 theory moves and shook hands. When Laszlo saw the game he was annoyed and said that he doesn't like games like that in his tournament as they are bad for his tournament's reputation. I didn't know that what I was doing would bother him and I just agreed because I would have felt like a jerk forcing my opponent to play when he was telling me that he wanted to be with a hospitalized family member.
Some of them are legit, but some are not, which are then abused over and over again. Look at 1000GM for example
This is why I don't necessarily have a issue with this especially in the last round if the players want to they can just play a Berlin and that is a draw offer in and of itself that ends in that many moves, but also I think a game or two like this in the last round for example is acceptable but if it's every round it becomes a problem
0:43 thanks for giving a shoutout for the renowned "GM" Levy roseman!
🐐grandmaster
@@TheCheckmateCorner In our hearts, he's a champion 😭
🤣🤣🤣 I watched Levy's game against "grandmaster" Sosa. Very suspicious. 🤣
❤
General Manager Levy Rozman
0:43 did you just premove levy's grandmaster title? 👀
Hell yeah, less go Levy
I remember a certain Fischer back in the 60's talking about similar things happen, but he's been called a lunatic while in fact he could have been right at the time.
He may have been a lunatic but he was not wrong. Chess back then was soaked in Soviet corruption.
Fischer (and Larsen) talked about fixed results between the Soviet players - usually draws as to spare energy. They did not talk about manipulated norms.
I'm pretty sure Fischer is called a lunatic for a whole lot of other reasons.
He was called a crazy cos he was anti semitic, misogynistic and mentally brokwn
Fischer was brilliant. Unfortunately too ahead of time
Not the most popular chess player nowadays, but Karjakin was inches away from world classical champion over the greatest player ever. He was one of those tilt proof players, shown in his 3 consecutive candidates, nearly winning all 3. Id say Carlsen's main rival in 2010s even though others would say Fabi or Anand.
Fabi was impressive.
@@seya_2 Imo Fabi is the clear #2 player of the Carlsen era, but Karjakin is definitely up there. He would be in contention for the greatest Candidates Tournament player of all time if not for Nepo.
0:44 Levi a GM? Press X to doubt
That's what you get when every youtuber has an opinion on shit they know nothing about
Gotham paid for his title!! With his youtube money 😮 look it up!! Talk about ironic
Get out of here
A
gothamchess is GM?? i think thats a mistake
And you had to share it 😂
Soon!
Hey
Thanks for making this video and referencing my article. Would have appreciated if you quoted it as a source below the video description, tho? Think it is a good practice for any sources used in any case.
Fr this RUclipsr is unprofessional. He quoted levy as a GM when he's not
Veryy passive-aggressive. Either thank him or demand correction.
weirdo
@@chessentials4261 he also stole music from Summoning Salt (does video game videos).
Cheating has been going on for a long time. The Soviets were notorious for gaining quick draws against one another to conserve their energy for non-Soviet GMs. And look at the corruptions of Campomanes and his Soviet handlers, and the Karpov v Korchnoi match which was jam-packed with Soviet shenanigans.
Do we have a jealous yankee here?😂
There are many levels of favouring. Indian top players get an insane amount of money compared to other nations, thus giving them an advantage, since they can focus more on the games, and less on financial stability.
@@MorningNapalm but there's nothing wrong in that. Indian sports has a history of suffering due to lack of funds. Far back in the 60s, the indian football team was the only one in Asia to qualify outright for the FIFA world championships, but they squandered the opportunity because the govt failed to generate enough funds for their travel abroad. This moment is regarded as the death of Indian football, as then cricket would become more popular, and football takes backstage. If other countries wanted, they could supply their chess players with funds as well. There is also not a lot of sports india does excellent in, internationally, except cricket, chess, some tennis, complex bow archery, javelin throw and a few others
@@kennethkilian1971 It isn't against the current rules, but it results in proportionally more Indian players, for what it is worth. I wish the financial support of chess players would be regulated, to level the playing field.
@@MorningNapalm not at all. Why should it be regulated. If a country doesnt want to support its players, thats the countries problem. Why should other countries that are willing to fund suffer?
Make no mistake, GM Sergey Karjakin may have gotten his initial title with slightly shady doings, if you believe in the rumors, and you probably don't agree with his pro-Putin stance, but he's a legitimate super GM.
Nobody's questioning his skill in the video, though, just the way he's gotten the title.
What and you are pro putin ?
Calmed opponent got angry and this is what he wanted
2:12 that's a familiar face..back from when i was at a first saturday tournament in budapest over 6 years ago
Attempting to dim other's light doesn't make yours any brighter.
but it would make me more seen
Brightness is relative
Great content! High quality.
Wait why is there a women’s chess league, that makes no sense
Cause men are still afraid of being shown up by women
Bobby Fischer isnt dead!!1!!1!1!1 proof
Not many women were playing chess so they have women only tournaments and stuff to attract more female players.
There are women titles, so it's easier for women to gain them and compete in rated tournaments - which are those women tournaments.
A big misunderstanding that many people have here is, that woman are not allowed to compete with men. That is not true. If a woman gains the norms and elo, they can gain the same titles as everyone else & compete in all the tournaments. The woman titles and tournaments was a way by FIDE to integrate woman more/makes it easier for them to compete in "higher level" tournaments.
It's because we don't want to see women crying
Corruption is every where; football, track and field, boxing,tennis and so forth. Sports,betting ,politics and money sadly live together.
Great coverage!
This is really a serious issue.. needs more publicity..I know from India, lot of people go to Europe trip for achieving norms and comes back as IM s..
That's not cheating, it's just being smart. Becoming an IM or GM in Russia is absolutely brutal.
@@waltlock8805 I'm not saying it as cheating. But if match fixing occurs in these tournaments for making it easier for them to achieve norms, it is a serious issue.
I think you brought up many good points and speculations in this video, however most of the sources was from Reddit which questions the legitimacy and validity of your claim.
Really nice analysis! Keep it coming.
0:42. let me also add that your editor seems confused about exactly what Levy can or cannot do. 🤷
So you're just reading the Chessentials article basically? Real original
What do you think of the im norm thing recently that chris bird shared?
Link?
0.32 Correction: It's "Candidate master" not "Candidates master"
not only that but a master is not a title unless it is FIDE master.
@@dannygjk Yes it is? I think you may be refering to the rule in norm tournaments that require a specific amount of titled players, with candidate master not being counted
@@YesPlatinum The lowest titled player is FIDE master. Maybe you are thinking of national master example USCF national master but they are not titled players.
@@dannygjk Candidate Master is a FIDE title.
@@dannygjk Candidate master is a FIDE title though. It's more recognized than National Master which is delivered by a federation
This is like karate/jiu jitsu handing out black belts to people without having to participate in any real sparring
Summoning salt inspired a fire chess video? Love it
I do NOT consider pre-arranged draws as cheating or as problem.
Paying for whatever results is cheating of course.
Levy is still IM as of the moment (not GM as indicated in the video)
Premoved
Match fixing sadly is not considered cheating by many players and even trainers. The barrier of proof required from arbiters is insane. This doesn't help our sport at all.
I don't know about some of these stories...an anonymous reddit user? The supposed words of someone who had already died? And of course, short draws do exist.
44 seconds in and you say that levy rozman is a GM, which is not a true, and that makes your video loses any credibility it may have, i'm not even watching it because it's not a fluke, it shows you've no idea what you're talking about.
It is true 😅
What is the background music playing 3:58?
Thats what im trying to figure out as well. It plays in the intro too.
What is a "norm factory"? Is this an industrial building where instead of churning out everyday consumer products, they churn out GMs?
Yes
2:14. Where do you get those chessmen? They look awesome.
UPDATE: After looking around, several online chess stores have a reproduction of this piece design listed as "Romanian Hungarian Set". I bought the ones from ChessNBoards and I love them. 3.8 inch king. Nice weight and finish.
This is an example of Kramnikism (or Magnusism?) - a highly speculative and almost malicious video, based on hearsay, bad interpretations, and misinformation.
For starters, agreeing to draws beforehand is not illegal nor shady; they also don’t imply that something is to be gained from making those draws. For a reason, they are called "grandmaster draws", and although not illegal per se, they are not very welcomed in elite tournaments because they are public events, and spectators pay to watch the fight. This led to the introduction of stipulations like the "Sofia Rules" - where draws are not allowed in less than 30 moves. However, in tournaments not played for the public, such as those for qualifying purposes, rating gains, or title pursuits, making quick draws with jaded old grandmasters becomes a strategy - they are there for the payment, so a draw means a 20-minute workday for them, but they can pounce if you want to battle.
Second, First Saturdays truly is a point of pilgrimage for newly made grandmasters. Like everything, some titles may have been "intervened", not because the Organizer fixes it, but perhaps due to low-effort players who want to gain a title as if paying for an online course certificate, analyzing their games with engines on. Cheating, if done well, will always exist, and little can be done about it. That doesn’t mean that everyone cheats.
Also, you pointing out the Hungarian Grandmasters playing the same tournament? They are locals -and it's their dream job! It's like going to work at the Starbucks in the corner, but with your brain.
To add to the previous point, the best player ever known to have gotten Grandmaster norms at the First Saturdays tournaments is none other than Fabiano Caruana. I bet you can't accuse him of cheating. Look how it turned out. Also, everyone worth their salt in chess knows that the kid Mishra is a monster, and this is not a line that will be written only once. Just take a look at his games, without engines first. Follow his example.
Karjakin: I have no idea about Karjakin, but it's difficult to argue with the results. However, chess cheating in Russia, or better said, collusion in Russia, is a documented issue that dates from the very first international tournament where Botvinnik got the title. It was done to advance one of their own, only among themselves. Still shady, so who knows.
Nemsko: You forgot to mention that her title is WGM (Woman Grandmaster), which is a lower title requiring only a 2300 rating. For the same reason, that could be why the games have a low move count issue.
Norms: Explained poorly. You forgot to mention that the minimum rating required by FIDE for GM norms is 2380, so it’s not a crime to have a 2390 average in a tournament, as it's designed this way for organizers. Still, the player has to prove their worth by getting a rating over 2500. It’s not a cheating issue; it's a rule issue. Do they have to raise it? I don’t know. Perhaps it's better to create another title, like a SGM. A Grandmaster title now doesn’t mean much in a world of 2600s and 2700s. And as per your examples, where you get a livelihood commenting on games... This guy Levy is not a GM.
Lastly, the use of "some say" in your narrative is the laziest way to accuse somebody of something. Haven’t you learned anything from the Hans Niemann affair? Those accusations with specific names and without definitive proof that would not hold in court are ripe for a juicy lawsuit. It’s actually good that this video has little to no views. I would sue you just for the clickbait: Came for the clickbait, stayed for the rage.
PS: Still waiting for you to mention the name of the world champion who cheated his title.
who does bro think he is and why tf r u inventing words lol
The solution to draws is simple. Every draw is counted as a loss! A lost for both players of course. Win or go home.
I am only a recreational player, usually and almost exclusively against the computer games such as Sparkschess. I do doubt their ratings but who am I. For example they rate Boris at 1800 but I must be 100 because I have never beat him. Hmmm….thus I am suspicious of all ratings based games.
Agreeing to a draw before you even play might not be cheating in your world, but I suggest that these draws undermine the spirit of competition. This diminishes the reputation of both opponents and is why I a sport such as baseball or hockey we have extra innings or overtime in the playoffs. Rigged draws is unacceptable. An honorable opponent would walk away. Chess must be an example of intellectual integrity.
The music is way louder than your voice we could barely hear you
Lol Levy isn't a GM, but he's working in it
Take his GM title, but he will easily destroy 99.999999% of all players 😂
Why do you feel the need for loud tweet noises?
Elo boosting in chess is even more pathetic than in CS and Dota...
A suggestion from me, make a video about FIDE Online Arena.
0:45, Levy made it to GM!!
getting youngest gm title doesnt guarantee sponsorship. i know abhi mishra and his dad a bit, allegedly corporate sponsors in US were not interested. that being said would be surprised if aid was zero as travel coaching expenses a few hundred K$ per year
You totally stole the music from Summoning Salt's videos. Not cool.
World champion who paid for his title seems kinda silly ngl, you are good enough to win world championships but not GM normal tournaments
Waaaait... this isn't Summoning Salt!
ny brother why is the music so loud! otherwise great video 👍
0:43 Gotham is not a GM he’s IM
POV u realized you’re a future GM (your horrible at chess and it’s not happening)
Dude short draws were made illegal before God was born - do better.
Do you seriously imply that Karjakin doesn’t deserve its rank among best players in the world!?
No.
Why the need for background music????
Its not same for Women, they can be GM or they can be WGM
So I'm not an amateur chess player, I'm just poor.
In that email he said match fixing but he must have meant game fixing.
Match is an ambiguous word, and can mean game too.
@@MorningNapalm not in the normal usage of game vs match. Generically yes of course everything is a match but then why even use the word match even if two people play each other 12 times for a prize?
@@dannygjk I am simply stating fact, not logic. Match can mean a game, or a series of games.
Sahil Tocco who was in chess competition was scammed he also made vidoe on it on channel chess assist.
Karjakin is probably better than 99.99%
Chess should be one of those things that has no division between Male or Female.
Its a contest of intelligence and wits not speed or strength
Women in chess often don’t feel safe due to the men being super creepy and sexist and even if they report it, if it’s a male titled player it’ll be swept under the rug immediately without investigating
could titles be granted based upon performance against an engine?
omg don't even start giving people such bad idea.
that's just silly
Horrible idea
Awesome video!!
They should come to India, USA to get GM, just like how Indians travel to Europe
Great video.. stop the constant back ground beat tho my brother
When you watch things from away, watch news etc one think everthing goes okay in ethical ways but truth is different, trash inside...
Gotham is NOT a chess gm🙏😭
What's the music from 0:01?
It's music that Summoning Salt uses for his videos but I can't think of the name
“We’re finally landing” is the name
@@ouroboros7209 thank you
wtf. summoning salt music. lmao
Yeah well, some guy needed 1 more win, so he cheated. Years went by, nobody cares.
Lol thats basically the old soviet union for you. In a bubble. You want to win you got to pay. If you dont pay, they will give you a headache.
cough nemko cough
0:43 Levy's not grandmaster, lolwat
hello you legends...
All kinds of cheating going on.
Subscribed
Corruption in eastern europe?? Say it aint so!
I personally think, that norm factories are a good thing for the sport. A GM title is super hard to get either way, and doesnt offer many benefits despite being flown in and paid for closed tournaments . For some GMs who got their title legitimate, its the only way to support themselves as coaching chess does often not pay nearly enough. If someone wants to pay hundreds of thousands to get a GM title but cant stay above 2400 elo points consistently in real games, let them. Most people that play chess, if they see a gm who peaked at 2500 once when they got the title and then straight went back to 2100 know whats up anyways
I feel both sides to this. Getting a grandmaster title is already way too rigged and difficult as is, the fact that there are more people with Doctoral degrees than grandmasters says it all. If anything it should be made a little easier for people to get titles and norms. I think the better way to handle this is to make sure that the round robin norm tournaments happen in an environment where everyone can see, not making it so that the norms have to be done on a swiss. I personally hate a lot of aspects in the swiss system and would much prefer sectioned round robins and winners advancing to the next round robin in a pool of the same number of players and so on. I personally prefer the Round Robin format because all pairings are predetermined beforehand and everything is on a set schedule and the next pairings don't have to be determined each and every time.
gm norms should be harder. Its not a free handout but claim to mastery of the game
@@geoffreygeorge999 🙄🙄🙄🙄
Too much ado about nothing, play the game for the love of the game, the noise around it don't matter.
2nd: 10:55 What's your opinion of Armageddon w/ auction, even in classical?
---
Well Bobby Fischer was preaching about pre-arrangement but I don't think increments & 9LX are enough to solve this.
I think we have to look to xiangqi where their armageddon has auction and was invented by a player named Ronghua Hu known as - surprise surprise - the Bobby Fischer of Xiangqi!
So I think bobby would like Armageddon (w/ auction) w/c makes every game fair & decisive.
- Plus in particular, bids for black in 9LX go like 12min/15min while in chess they're like 9min/15min since 9LX doesn't have as many draws or as much white advantage (except in computers).
---
Armageddon w/ auction makes every game fair & decisive.
I believe this'd mean
- A - no more draws but in a good way not in a no stalemate way. And a fortiori no pre-arranged draws
- B - no more rapid tiebreaks. You can play chess w/o Armageddon and then settle classical matches w/ classical tiebreaks
- C - Can have best-of-1 knockouts
- D - All single round robins & single swiss are fair.
- E - There's no more issue of drawing a best-of-4 by compensating for a white loss with a white win & 2 black draws like in 2016 & 2023 classical wcc's where Sergey & Nepo had more black wins than Magnus & Liren.
I notice these 3 improvements of Bobby
- 9LX
- Increment
- Armageddon (w/ auction)
Are used more in rapid than classical but they should be used more in classical!
u know most of games when a 2500-2600 players play against eachother end in a draw and most of them arent even pre arranged draws so u want to grab an equal game and force a player to win it? this obviouly would increase the number of wins with black not because of good play but because white will eventually need to go wild as a draw is the same as a loss.
Plus, lots of players whether amateur or pros have a solid playstyle which would suck as white in ur format
You are talking CRAP! Your suggestions are a JOKE and an INSULT to CHESS TRADITION and HISTORY!!
@@GeorgeAlexopoulos-o7w why do you hate ronghua hu?
@@Gustavo-xe4op thanks for sharing.
1- if they have solid playstyle that would suck as white, then they shouldn't have a problem bidding much lower for black then?
2- is classical 9LX armageddon w/ auction better than classical chess armageddon w/ auction?
i figure 9LX has little theory, white advantage & draws so they might bid 60min vs 45min instead of 60min vs maybe 15min
45 he is IM
Interesting…
Your shot was easy 😂
Levy will never be GM. Clownchannel!!