Corrupt Cop Gets FIRED And SUED After Ridiculous Arrest
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 фев 2024
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Spotify: spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • 3 Officers Lie To Crea...
Update videos:
• Lying Cops Update - On...
• 3 Lying Cops Sued Afte...
LackLuster’s channel: / @lacklustermedia
Flex Your Rights’s channel: / @flex_your_rights
Sources:
Articles-
bit.ly/4aXU57q
bit.ly/4aQcGCl
bit.ly/41VoP4R
Wright City Code of Ord. § 217.010- bit.ly/3OqpTZ5
Wright City Code of Ord. § 217.015- bit.ly/3tS3nB1
Texas v. Johnson- bit.ly/3CRAe8K
Cohen v. California- bit.ly/2OMM14a
Garcia v. City of New Hope- bit.ly/3Sj8Kld
U.S. v. Thompson- bit.ly/3u2IQd0
U.S. v. Williams- bit.ly/3O2aBte
U.S. v. Jacobsen- bit.ly/42eQhLb
Wright City Code of Ord. § 310.020- bit.ly/3O2ppIn
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 300.080- bit.ly/3tUBmJc
Wright City Code of Ord. § 210.390- bit.ly/48T5Ny9
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 575.150- bit.ly/3tLbwYa
State v. Steward- bit.ly/3TYKKGa
Be sure to check out my second channel! I'm try to get it to 100k and I need your help! www.youtube.com/@johnlang6593
Flipping off the cop was letting the cop know he strongly disapproved of the officer having nothing better to do than encroach on private property and cause problems, even after he gave the officer good reasons as to why the vehicles were there.
I subscribed to you buddy I watch all your videos and your videos have saved my ass a lot and saved a cop from shooting me at 23 years old bc he wouldn't deescalate the situation. Thank you very much for what you have taught me!
The derelict vehicle law seems like it would be in violation of the 4th amendment. If they can enter and search for "tags" on them whether they are in date or not .
How can they search for a tag on private property without a warrant. If they can't read the tag from the road or street.
Question --- How the HELL do you work on a project car in that town ? If you were say building a kit AC Cobra car... you would be cited for pushing it out to the driveway to work on it ??? What the heck ?
Question for you (or for anyone), I can see the officer making the threat accusation being terminated and criminal charges for lying about the threat considering the Detective in question (or any officer) could of come up with handguns drawn and possibly even opening fire based on the threat allegation, why exactly was the detective fired for responding to a call made by an officer for responding to said threat?
I mean, the Detective was going based on what the officer said and had no clue if it was true or not, I get that, but just not understanding why he was the one terminated for responding to what was said over the radio. Shouldn't that also fall back on the lying cop who started all of this?
If cops would take five seconds to listen to what a person is saying , it would clear up ninety percent of the communication mistakes.
NO IT WOULDN'T! BLUE LINE GANG MEMBER CLOWNS,ARE GODS & CAN DO NO WRONG(qualified immunity)!!THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE & we r their pets!!
That would require them to check their ego which is not possible for cops to do.
@@adcolt54 Exactly, their mentality is you do whatever i say when i say it, GOT IT BUD
Why would they? 1/3 of the country has made it clear that they back the blue no matter what.
Egos won't let them listen.
Charge the cop with filing a false report. He did exactly that.
They all do.
its so rare for that to happened they just go to another police department and continue their work and most times they get a better position its crazy
HELL HE WILL MOST LIKELY GET A RAISE & PAID VACATION
Perjury is a felony.....as is almost everything these felon did.....
Esp giving false info to his co worker.
$100k? Im totally going to record this summer because these cops are the NEW lottery ticket and I need to get PAID!
Lol you do know that's how cities go broke that shit gets paid by the people that lives in that state not the police
Lol just don't get shot
What Willy said
Make sure you have life insurance and a will for whom to leave it to.
I started. I'm about to get rich over here in Raleigh North Carolina.
100k for a 400$ expense and 5 hrs of detainment sounds good to me im next !! Lol
Unfortunately, the attorneys are going to get half
@@griffin0010 and he’s going to waste the rest on a pet shop.
@@griffin0010usually 60/40 split but pretty much
@@user-sd8tz9dt8t You forgot I am also buying cocaine and hookers!
@@user-sd8tz9dt8t Yeah exactly, WTF!?!?!? A pet shop!? REALLY!?!?!? Well the guy doesn't seem to bright to be honest, such a waste!!!
Any cop who cannot handle a middle finger, lies about a threat which could have ended way worse should never be in law enforcement.
Should be charged with something too
He could have placed the stickers on his care and just go on his way. But he not only lied, he told the other cops to stop the guy.
@@ljcalhounyeah, this felt a little more personal... Like they had it out for this guy for whatever reason.
Sounds like Chief Wiggum and his officers.
KKKops don't become Psychopaths... Psychopaths become KKKops.
...and there is no "off switch" after they clock out.
“Please get off my property”
“Ahhh he put my safety at risk for that! I feared for my life and took that personally”.
“I feared for my fragile ego crumbling if I’m not getting the upper hand in a petty argument”*
Hey! Watch that threatening tone!!!
TRC - Cops are so very afraid ... of everything. And that is how people get shot ASAP.
He threatened his ego 🤣
@@sks220 And there it is. EGO.
This captain is hoping if he gives this guy a break with these tickets, he wont sue. That is how I am taking it
no doubt - and still insulting him all the while saying 'you were threatening' etc
Exactly what he was hoping for. 😂😂
These videos should constitute an entire block of mandatory police training everywhere.
“How about I break your window” is much more threatening than anything the man had said to the officer. Pigs are such bullies.
Is he actually a cop? No body camera, no badge, he's wearing a t-shirt anyone can buy online or have made.
All I'm saying is if this role player pulled me over I'd tell him to get a real cop with a badge and body cam, a badge alone doesn't prove anything. Sure you can murder me bud but that doesn't impress me much. Did you steal the police car from a real cop?
Exactly. "You threatened an officer." "What threat?" "I'm not gonna tell you that. Now give me your info or I will break your window." what a joke
And cowards!
@@AngryAmericanWizardI noticed that he asked someone else for a window breaker……..
Issue is the first cop said the guy threatened him, this all stemmed from the first cop choosing inappropriate and wrong language. He also requested another cop to pull him over which was incorrect.
It's illegal to store your own car on your own property? That's insane.
Land of the Free...
Have to make sure the town is getting all that money from having to register everything plus excise tax if they have it in that state.
HOA!!
*'MURICA!*
There *was* a town ordinance that made it an offense, yes. ATA read it to you. What you do is turn the car nose out so the rear plate, the only one with an expiration sticker, does not face the street. Then an officer must justify going onto your property to see the expiration, since cops aren't fond of actually getting out of their cars, this is theaeasiest way around a cite. And the ordinance, as read, does not prohibit keeping unregistered cars in an enclosed garage or inside a fence, out of sight.
A perfect case of "Contempt of cop" where a cop makes trouble because their fragile ego was hurt.
Wow. What a bullshit law. His vehicles parked on his driveway does not endanger the public in any way, shape, or form.
It’s never, never your property, always the state, or crown’s you just live there. Can’t truly own land
Unless he was part of an HOA in which I do not think so. From my perspective the cars were safe to drive.
I'm from a small town in Mississippi. And we have the same b******* ordinance. It's just a way for this city council to make money off of people who are trying to either make up some money on the side. Or are going through hard times
@@phillipscardino2453you guys put them in office
I think you missed the point.
"What threat did I make?"... "You can't threaten officers". Genius level communication by that officer
It's them programming the narrative.... Once they make the accusation, that's all they do is keep repeating.... You're not allowed to do what they accused you of...... They say all these things to use as articulation and justification when it comes to court
Yeah, he just blindly followed what the first officer told him, which in many cases I suppose is what you want, don't have time to investigate and question everything in the moment. But that dude was a dick. He should have at least questioned the first officer and made sure, they have radios and phones...
You can’t do that…why?….because….okay because why?….because of the law; of because & now you’re obstructing the law.
I pulled this from a police training manual, the next chapter is copsplaining, how to win circular arguments with circular reasoning.
@@joshjjenobody wants that if they believe in constitutional rights. it may not be easy to be a cop in the USA because of the Constitution but that's their problem to work around, not a private citizen's.
Sounds like an Unconstitutional ordnance to me...🙄
Imagine losing your job and getting sued because your buddy lied to you and said he was threatened and he gets to keep his job. I wonder how's that friendship going
I don't believe he was liked in the dept so he got the axe instead of the one who lied about the threats
@@buttonsf3293 More than likely. I bet that he didn't try to confirm what the other officer told him played a factor as well.
The bad cops are never held accountable. Instead the ones who actually stand for the rights of we the people get punished
@@BadJellyman100and it’s sad they can’t uphold their oath of office without being held as the “bad” one!
he'll just be hired in another department down the road.
How is it right for the chief to say "i understand you're an argumentative person" if he's never met or conversed with him before ??? Anyone has a right to argue a fact when the cop is blatently lying through his teeth and accusing you.
Because he kept trying to interrupt with "I KNOW MY RIGHTS!" when the chief was trying to tell him that all the charges were being dropped. The guy obviously doesn't know how to deal with cops that are agreeing with him
@blockhead134 Clearly, the guy is argumentative. This would have been so much better if the man was humble
He certainly didn't help his own case by immediately butting in with "I am NOT argumentative!"
@@blockhead134being in his right is being argumentative ? At this point laws about non conformism are not far
It would be horrible to live somewhere you couldn't have things on your private property without being harassed by the police over it.
"There's laws that go above and beyond the constitution"
Fire this man immediately
I don't even understand what that means 🤨
Most Americans believe that. That's all I can conclude after watching hundreds of videos where they dial 911 because someone is filming them or holding a sign they don't like. They want the cops to stomp them to the ground, and for the judge give them a year in jail.
@lazydaisy2292 it sounds it like it means that they have the right to violate your rights if they deem you breaking the law to an arbitrary extreme.
Well, to police the law is their perception of it, so therefore they perceive that their knowledge of the law is higher than the constitution. And now I’ve gone cross eyed.
😂@@deaconyates2671
When a Police Chief drops all charges of a BS arrest,
You know he’s shitting his pants over a lawsuit.
Warren county does a lot to protector crooked cops. The guy that used to be a jailer there. Our stories to tell. That’s very corrupt that he quit and join the military. I know they covered up for a officer called short.
To be fair the Police Chief deserves kudos for the complete turnaround of the situation.
Or possibly he's actually a good guy?
Oh yeah, his language about "hope we can put this behind us" gives it away. Still, at least he didn't double down.
I was gonna say, that line there proves he was looking out for their department but he also did a good job @@adamjensen8702
13:10 "I understand that you are an argumentative individual." "I am NOT an argumentative individual!" LOL
What I've gathered is that if you hurt a police officers feelings you're either gonna be dead or able to file a lawsuit a few days later.
Imagine not being able to park a car in YOUR driveway without it being registered, without getting a citation…. Absolutely ridiculous
Just one reason I stopped registering MY PROPERTY with the treasonous terrorist aggravated extortionist STATE over 2 decades ago.....
Alot of states are like this. I inherited my grandmothers car, one of the only things I had from her. I already had my own car so I parked her car at the back of my driveway, behind my house. There were only 2 cars in my driveway so I didn't have a car filled, junky yard or anything like that. Within 2 months I got a notice in the mail that I was being charged an initial $150 fee and then $100 every month after if I didn't get the car registered AND insured (even though i had no plans of driving it). I had turned the old plates in (they were from another state) so it wasn't a fine associated with that. Some person working for the county apparently has the job of diving around and looking in people's yards for cars with no tags and then fining them. Keep in mind this car was a good distance behind my house, at the end of a driveway that curved a little so they had to of come on my property to see it didn't have a tag. I just wanted to keep 1 car to have for a backup and for memories. I couldn't afford the insurance cost every month at the time, I was barely paying the bills I already had so I had to sell it. 😢😢😢😢
It's rediculous....land of the free my @$$.
@@LaLaLonnaprobably too late now, but you could've sued the for trespassing
You do a refusal for cause if the "property" is not registered and not involved in "TRANSPORTATION" (TRAFFIC), they have ZERO authority to tell you what to do with it.....They aggravated extorted you under the color of law and committed treason.....
@@LaLaLonna
_"You're an argumentative person."_
"No, I'm not."
🙄🙄🙄
“He wasn’t a fan of me being here.” - at his home? You’re right!
I don't think 🤔 ANYONE is a fan of them being at the house! If they are there obviously something has gone wrong or will be made worse shortly 😂
“Threaten me to get off the property..” - way to over dramatize the word “asking/telling”.
Exactly. Understandably so!
The fact that this cop was fired, proves he was wrong! But why is he not in Jail?
Qualified immunity
@@ashes1301 Doesn't apply to lies and first amendment violations. BUT the government can simply refuse the case as they see fit. And they see fit to protect their wallet at the expense of us citizens. The government, as a whole, has created insane amounts of laws and means by which to abuse people and not pay for it. It doesn't stop with the cops. The entire thing, top to bottom, is just a series of "we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing."
It scares me that you never run out of videos showing bad/dangerous police work. The other scary part is the amount of bad police officers who just happened to be caught on camera which makes the pool lower.
The fact that the cop is on camera and just makes things up. And then the chief has no choice but to void the charges to not have a lawsuit, but then still tried to say the cops acted in “good faith”? Right.
ATA did mention it’s possible Beard had not yet got the clear story from Malta. That may be the Good Faith the Lt. was going by. In any case, Lt. Matthews smelled bullshit and blanked everything on Hall, making it right bringing true justice to Mr. Hall.
This is why there are no good cops
Also did you notice during his explanation he just could not resist demeaning the guy some more, saying things like "I know you are an argumentative person". WTF? He was clearly doing the minimum possible to reduce the exposure of his department while showing his contempt for the people that he is supposed to serve.
@@MichaelAarons1701he's a pretty shitty detective, the guy told him multiple times there was no threat made and asked him what the threat was. If he was a critical thinker maybe he would've thought about it and asked the other cop what the threat was.
Most cops arent high IQ. They actually are allowed to deny officers who are too high iq(aka a iq above 90. Mentally disabled)
He hurt that poor little cop's feelings, so he called another gang member to get even.
Completely retaliatory.
He called papi
Yup
I really appreciate how thoughtful you are and how thorough you are. Thank you for all of the hard work you put into these videos. 🙏
Thank you for presenting the case, laying out the information and letting us know how it turned out.
"I understand you're an argumentative person" is a weird thing to say while apologizing for being wrong in a dispute
Extremely provocative. He is part of the problem
They have to gaslight.....
To be fair…the guy is argumentative
@@ebaker16 tongue meet boot
That head swine wasn't apologizing for anything. It's hilarious that he was in full blown CYA mode because he damn well _KNEW_ his subordinate swine had broken multiple laws, and he was praying the victim wouldn't file a lawsuit...but he was still incapable of offering a legitimate apology and acknowledging that his subordinate swine and screwed the pooch. I'm more convinced every day that the primary requirements for becoming a pig are an overblown ego, a predisposition to bullying, and a shoe size for an IQ.
What did you pull me over for?
“Retaliation”
Retaliation is a form of cowardice
Omg thank you so much for this channel... I thought watching body cam videos and police interactions always meant I would be losing class/brain-cells... But you actually teach me new legal terminology and the underlying dialectic arguments
I love how the captain tries to make it sound like the citizen was getting something positive out of his ordeal and tries to wrap it up without any repercussions to the officers.
A $100,000 settlement seems to indicate a lack of "good faith" on the part of the local police.
And homeboy turned around and opened a business thereby GIVING BACK to his community, - much more than the police department can say.
“With the $100,000 settlement, he stated he was going to build a twin turbo 1991 Honda crx awd” 😂
WILL YOU TELL ME & ABOUT 200.000.000 PEOPLE HOW A COP HAS GOOD FAITH to a citizen
Whole ass city with HOA level ordinances.
Gross
@@dicezart9667 that is true. But, this is retaliation
@@dicezart9667 but if the cars are in your driveway i don't get how that still applies and if you own the cars or its a friends/family members. On the street i can see the issue but on your property/driveway doesn't make sense. I guess if he puts car covers on the cars then its fine?
Foreal
@@Esther-lm6pm "that is true. But, this is retaliation"
Yes, it is, it's retaliation for Junk Car Man Hall being absurdly rude. I see no problem here.
@@dicezart9667 as a canadian, this is mind blowing, and not very land of the free. here once a car is on private property and not public streets theres not really anything they can do. even parking lots with speed signs or stop signs are entirely unenforceable. a municipality can pass by-laws banning parking a motor vehicle is some specific locations on private property, but it applies to all motor vehicles regardless of registration or usability, usually must be focused around some access way or something. and a new bylaw must be passed every time they want to prohibit an area.
Awesome never do I leave watching your episodes I always leave the channel with more knowledge ty
Audit the Audit, one of the best channels out there. Exposing the top clowns in law enforcement. Keep up the great work.
I really wish cops actually understood what getting arrested can do to your personal life if you don't get acquitted. People get fired from their job, they lose money to pay rent, lose their cars etc. Cops just act like it's not a big deal and are so fucking quick to take people it's really disturbing
They understand very well. It's why they try to lock up anyone that they have a bad encounter with, regardless of if they committed a crime or not
essentially its a customer service job, you need nerves of steel or else you get burnt.
its almost like the US has never been a democracy and the increasing power (money legal and force) makes it clear we live in a police state
They know. They don't care.
They completely understand. That's exactly why they do it.
The cops just make up things and then the guy is punished for it. Just unbelievable how tiny their little egos are when people don’t immediately bend the knee to them.
The egos are not tiny they're huge because they never get in trouble
There are other tiny things that these cops have, not their egos.
Imagine living with their mentality everyday. It is somewhat sad
Spank me, officer
When the average cop opens their mouth as a rule of thumb you can assume they are lying!!!
I like that your channel is genuinely informative and that you don't have watermarks plastered all over your videos. I saw one "Look at me! Look at me!" idiot's channel today that had TWO watermarks on his videos.
Shoutout to lieutenant Matthews. He talked the talk and walked the walk. We need more leadership like him.
Now I have seen it all. A cop can violate your rights, threaten you with harm, tow your car and falsely arrest you and the cop boss claims he was acting in good faith. Un-fucking believable.
Mfs can do anything at this point. Like what in the hell. A cop pulling you over cuz a random other cop just says he was threatened. These cops fucking suck.
That is just the beginning
He lucky acorn didnt fall out of nowhere
And other humans defend it
@@simplysavvy0113boot lickers are the worst they enable all of this and down anyone for speaking up for our rights.
They guy asked the cop politly to not delay doing his busines & leave because he was not welcome any longer than needed. The cop escalated, by saying "I'll take my time" which prompted the very derserving middle finger. That officer is a disgrace!
He had to call straight to city hall and talk to the chief of police... that's the 1st card I pick up when I move to any town... Lol
The one thing I love about this channel is that it goes through everything. I love law enforcement.
But I also love it when they get called out on their BS.
This channel is what we need. And this channel is what is needed for everyone law enforcement officer to watch as well as understanding case laws to basic laws.
Law enforcement isn’t a pretty thing like every other public service job. But the one thing you are told to do is act professional and don’t let things get personal for you.
Once again, charges dropped. Left-handed apologies with a pile of cop-splaining . Problem bieing, the victim STILL was threatened with physical harm, arrested, spent 5 hrs kidnapped and restrained and suffered physical, mental and financial harm.
Sad "state" of affairs.
That city ordinance preventing you from keeping cars on your property needs to go to the supreme court
Why? Most communities have standards of livability, and that includes not having heaps of junk in your driveway or otherwise visible to anyone passing by.
@@eponymousImebecause it's ridiculous that a city can exercise such control over your personal property
@@RDA8191>>@eponymousIme because it's ridiculous that a city can exercise such control over your personal property
@@eponymousIme Were the vehicles in this instance a heap of junk? It seemed that the house and yard were kept in good condition, and the cars were parked just like any other might be in their own drive way.
@@eponymousIme"heaps of junk" the only thing separating those cars from being legal is a license plate karen
Salutes 👋 from Celaya Guanajuato 🇲🇽
This is scary man. That punk lying could have cost this man his life.
The first lying officer should have been fired for reporting a false crime,and causing the hole Incident
100 %!
“I understand you’re argumentative” …they just can’t help themselves.
Standing up for your rights = trouble maker.
@@SmittyAZliterally true
What's funny to me is how passive aggressive cops are when they're being stood up to. It shows how weak and immature they are as individuals.
Man even the intro music gets me fired up for some justice. Those rototoms are the cherry on top 🥁
Those vehicle laws on private property are absolutely insane.
BS law .
Old ladies with nothing better to do and HOAs come up with this stuff. It filters up to the town or county level because they’re the only ones with the time to go to meetings to suggest crap like this. The politicians, their motive is simple, scalp and skim as much money as possible, thing is they’re not very creative, but along comes a Karen that gives them that idea and its off to the races. Did you notice how the head idiot said that he got the tow company to waive the charges, tow guys don’t do that… ever, unless there’s another beneficial deal they don’t want to mess up. I’d bet money that tow company is owned by a cop or a local politician.
They are. And I'm surprised how common they are.
I was shadow banned for a comment about old ladies and hoa on your comment
@@deaconyates2671 typical you tube censorship. But I feel like I understand your lost comment with those key words "old ladies" and "HOA".
Thank goodness there weren’t any acorns around to threaten the officer
That video was crazy......
"I'm hit"whilst he rolled in the ground and threw his gun on the ground!!!
What video is that
😂😂
Lol😂 that was crazy
@@TruettDfind @deletelawz
Who is this lieutenant Matthews, and how can we get him cloned. This guy should be standard issue for every law enforcement agency from sea to shining sea!! My hats off to you sir! Outstanding job!
13:10 "I understand that you're an argumentative individual." "I'm NOT an argumentative individual!" 😆
Malta: Try and get a stop on that GMC suburban.
Beard: Copy, what for?
Malta: He hurt my feelings
I love how cops want everybody to sit back and listen to their bs and the second you speak up, they look at you like you wronged them so badly. Like the garbage they are spewing out of their mouth deserved to not be questioned.
I love this channel. Very educational
The other cop was like is it his house ? You messed up my man !
Sue the crap out of cop #2. He witnessed no threat made.
Cop#1 was never threatened.
The stop was illegal.
Collective intelligence, if cop 1 says there was a threat made cop 2 has to assume there was for safety. Cop 1 sure go for it, but not cop 2.
They're not cops, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo
They can stop me anytime they like if I get $100 THOUSAND DOLLARS!
However, cop 2 was formally stated to be acting on *only* the act of the middle finger, as stated in their report and shared during their altercation. The issue was not cop 2 using collective intelligence, it was that the 'intelligence' provided did not constitute detainment or arrest.
@Gr33NGiAnT365
@@Gr33NGiAnT365thought that would be common sense smh 🤦
He'll either be exonerated by a corrupt judge and re-hired or he will get a job with another corrupt police department. We've all seen this before, countless times. He should stay fired, be prosecuted for making a false report and placed on the Brady list.
Brady list lets them continue to be police. FIRED !
@@markbanks4738 I did say stay fired. Being on the Brady list makes them much less likely to be hired by another police force. And we know that dirty cops skip from force to force.
Love this channel. Hold them fools accountable. 😅
EXCELLENT...Thank You.
"Show me your "flipping a cop off" insurance or I will break your window and arrest you." THAT'S SOUNDS LIKE AN ILLEGAL THREAT.
Without the protection of a valid traffic stop, it sounds a lot worse. To bad prosecutors don't care. Until we demand a separate special prosecutor who's job it is to charge police. We will just keep playing this game.
@@EthosAtheosyou make an excellent point!
"Hopefully we can put this behind us" ... don't sue us cuz you will win
I’m so glad Lt. Matthews is a reasonable man and saw that everything that Mr. Hall did noticing wrong. Officers seem to get retaliatory when they get butt hurt and abuse their power. Not all… but the majority, I’m gonna say. I love that he is the reason for amending the law! That’s awesome! Good job, Lt. Matthews! So glad Officer Beard was fired!
I really hope Mr. Hall has a very successful pet store… even though I pray the animals are not coming from an abusive source, and you really should go to a shelter to adopt a pet. Maybe if it’s just smaller animals that again, are not coming from abusive situations.
The chief sidestepped the real issue. That his officer lied to Beard about being threatened. He's the first one who should have been fired here but somehow he escaped justice. What a crock of sh/t.
“You’re under arrest for threatening an officer”
“What threat did I say”
“You flipped off an officer”
“That’s not a threat”
“Well I’ll just throw out all basic common sense and say that was somehow a threat”
Its a threat because 911 and police risk their lives every day. /S
Just like Game of Thrones.
It’s a threat when it suits someone’s purpose but otherwise it’s not.
That's not what happened. The other officer lied to him. Said he flipped him off AND threatened him. The problem is he never found out what that threat was. He never suggested flipping him off was a threat. In fact, he outright said it's not a threat.
It’s hard enough to get a project car together without the cops harassing you
Best get a cover. If they try to remove the cover to see that's a breach of your rights.
@The_Gallowglass I’m blessed enough that I put mine in my garage but not everyone has that option
We need a national list keeping track of law informant officers who were fired and why.
All things considered, glad that the Chief actually followed through and had that ordinance amended.
Qualified immunity should not be given to officers if they are found to be lying or making stuff up and they should be held personally responsible for any harm to their victims, not the taxpayers. If they did nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, what is wrong with it? Kind of like they tell people when they want to do searches.
Q.I. IS how the police, prosecutors and judges get away with their constant crimes against us. Q.I. WAS devised to protect their crimes so they can never be prosecuted.
I wanna thank Audit The Audit real quick.
Because of this channel (and Andrew Flusche) I've gotten a much more deeper appreciation for learning about my rights.
A few days ago, a police officer showed up at my house. I refused to open the door and didn't even acknolwedge him.
He then opens the front glass door. I assumed it was to put his card on my door.
To my shock, the deadbolt starts slaming against the deadbolt housing.
This cop just tried to force his way into my house without a warrant or any type of exigent circumstance!!!
What was he going to do next??? "Uh, excuse me your front door was open." No, it wasn't!
I immediately went to the sherriff's site and filed an official complaint of violation of my 4th amendment rights. I didn't even know you could do that until I started wating AiT.
People, educate yourself on your rights! Don't let a police officer abuse them and trample them. Because they will.
Cops are nothing more than humans like you and I and there are plenty that just "do as they please" with complete disregard for the law and the rights we're guaranteed as citizens of the US.
Thank you AiT and Andrew Flusche for helping to educate me.
Edit: And got the response from the filed copmlaint.
I have a feeling most of you will be saying "Not even surprised...cops protect cops".
==========
I am in receipt of your complaint dated 02/13/24 and your allegations against Deputy . Because Deputy did not encounter anyone at your residence, he did not activate his body worn camera.
I have, however, received a report from him regarding his actions, submitted without the benefit of him first reviewing your complaint.
He advised that after observing the delivery driver drop a package off on your front porch, he approached your residence and noticed that the package was gone, indicating that someone was home. He advised that he opened the outer porch door and knocked on the interior door several times, perhaps somewhat forcefully to get your attention, knowing that you were home.
In doing so, he noticed that the door seemed to be loose on its hinges or otherwise not securely fastened.
He also indicated that while he may have touched the door handle to see if the door was in fact secure, he did not attempt to open it.
Upon your refusal to come to the door he left, ensuring to secure the storm door as your note requested.
==========
He just said he knew I was at the residence. Why didn't he turn his body camera on?
He did all this "Starsky and Hutch" detective work, keeping track of my fucking packages and when I picked them up!
So if he knew I was there, why wasn't the camera rolling?
And in what scenario is it ever appropritate to "touch a door knob and make sure it's secure?!"
You guys ever heard someone fabricate lies as they go along? B/c that's exactly what this guy is doing.
It's like Bill Clinton saying "I did not inhale! I put the joint to my mouth but I didn't inhale!"
The cop is saying "I did not try to force my way in. I put my hand on the door knob to have a moment with it, but I did not turn it and push!"
In other words, they deleted the footage and the burden of proof is on me.
I didn't video record the son of a bitch b/c I thought it was the UPS driver. My phone was downstairs, not on me.
I used to defend police officers. I told people "Don't forget, there are some good ones."
And now I'm finding it hard to utter those words again. I've never had a positive cop encounter. It either negatively affects me or, at best, is a netural interaction.
When I was attacked, they did nothing.
When my car was broken into (several times), they did nothing.
When my house was robbed and I told them exactly who robbed me and where my stuff was, they did nothing!
WTF is the point of a police officer anymore?!?!
It's just a big fucking game of "who can we throw in jail" for them.
And they're almost untoucheable unless you can record them in the act!
Even then it's not guaranteed anything will happen to them!
I'm so disgusted!!!!
WTF is happening to our country?!
WTF happened to "Serve and protect"?!
Seconded on Andrew being a GREAT resource, especially for VA residents like me.
Make sure to film them when (not if) they retaliate. Following you, passing by your house, parking in front of your house etc.
Should watch Lack Luster, The Civil Rights Lawyer and maybe We the People University
I had a young cop bang on my door at 5am, I answered asking what's going on. By the time I got to the door he was down at the bottom of the stairs so I opened the door and stuck my head out to talk. He said he got a call, so I looked over at the number on my house making sure its still there and asked what address and he said my number but used "apartment A" which was a sign since I'm apartment 1 and never use or heard it referred to A before. Then it became odd, he just stood with a weird smile so I asked if he knows what the call was about, he said he did and just stood there. So I asked if he has a phone # he can call them back because I certainly didn't call and there's no one else home. Finally over his radio someone tells him the women who called says she can see him and he's at the wrong house. He just walked away without saying anything. It was very odd. I'm thinking it was a domestic abuse call since. They got the address wrong.
Received a response. Thought you guys might want to read the update.
I think I'll have to seek legal council on the matter.
But IDK how to prove what he did. I didn't record it and they scrubbed the footage already.
Accurate assessment ATA 👍🏻
Just tax collectors for unregistered vehicles. Not protecting nor serving anyone in the public.
How does Officer Malta not get fired? He seems like the really bad cop here
If one cop relays misinformation to another. The second cop is acting on that information in good faith.
@@Jeremy-wp4yh Shouldn't the second LEO clarify with the first the specifics of the threat? I mean, that seems like "good cop" common sense. What would the first LEO say, "He threatened me with his middle finger?"
Edit: Whoopsie. Wrote this before getting to the second's report in the video. Yeah, the second cop is NOT a "good cop" and is also part of the problem.
@@icin4d that's the point. We don't know what was said. If we are both cops and someone "threatens me" you would respond based on that threat. It's only logical for people serving on the same force.
@@icin4dgang mentality
@@Jeremy-wp4yh, you're not very bright, are you?
The ordinance also fails to take into account, the selling of a former vehicle. Essentially saying once you no longer intend to drive the vehicle you have to dispose of it, which is absolutely ridiculous.
So crazy, like they must not have much real work to do, so they can't find any productive or positive
things they could do in the community .
Lieutenant Matthews, " I understand your an argumentitive person", "Officers acted in good faith". Always starts at the top. The nice cop portion of the interview was to avoid a lawsuit and protect his boys.
Agreed, but they still got sued and it was the taxpayers that had to crack open the wallet. Such settlements should at least come from the police budget, if not from their pensions and/or salaries.
And you just know the Lt. would be up in arms well beyond this guy's behavior and be pretty damn argumentative himself if something like this happened to HIM.
Saw someone getting arrested yesterday and she was talking up a storm.
Yelled at her told her she didn’t have to tell them shit. She shut up real quick and I hope she lawyered up
the fact someone left this comment and it has likes shows not the smartest people are being influenced by this channel that present "lawsuits" as wins when they haven't happened yet
@@billwe5772
Ever heard of punctuation “smart people”?
He's not very smart. @@SaraphDarklaw
comma
What's sad is that we live in a country where even being able to move forward with a lawsuit against an officer is a small win but still a win.
FYI, I'm guessing @billwe5772 is a boot licker.
🙄 this reminds me of my uncle. My best friend posted something on MY social media feed that included the word “damn” and he decided to tell her that it’s ILLEGAL for her to “curse in public” and told her she could be arrested for it.
I told him “That’s BS.” and he went on to argue with me for a while until I finally blocked him. She was even nice enough to apologize & I told her that she had nothing to apologize for and that he was being ridiculous.
I love Audit the Audit he’s great. He reviews all these cases under a fine microscope thank God for RUclips and freedom of speech while we still have it.❤
The fact that the Lt. Called the victim an "argumentative person" and continued to try and save face... he's lucky with the grade he got.
he was an argumentative person though lol
@@itskastrand 👅 👢
I almost spit out my drink at the interaction at 13:10 . That "I am NOT an argumentative individual" had so much sass.
@@your.opinion.sucks. ur just ass mad i didnt give the victim a pas because he was a victim lmfao
The chief’s only motivation to verbalize that the officers were acting in good faith pursuant to the ordinance was to help them claim qualified immunity later. Guarantee it.
^^^THIS Copsplaining
You would be correct sir.
First of all, that wasn’t the chief.
Secondly, qualified immunity is not something that needs to be “claimed.” It is a legal doctrine that inherently applies to all public servants unless a COURT finds they acted in bad faith. Lt. Dan verbalizing it to the complainant does nothing to strength or weaken the officers case, it’s entirely irrelevant to any subsequent court proceedings.
@@Jcreek201 you wrote in complete, coherent sentences, so I’m going to assume that you aren’t as dopey as the nature of your reply implies. You’re obviously not an attorney, so you just decided to pick apart a comment to argue semantics with a stranger on the internet? Douche behavior.
First of all, Chief, Lt, PIO…who fucking cares?
Secondly, my comment was about the mindset of police when they violate rights. He is foreshadowing their defense in court. It’s their standard talking points to try to fool the public (and the courts). We all know why they REALLY did this to the victim…
The Lt did his job and did his job well. The explanation offered is consistent with this position as an employee of the city to protect their assets from judgments when possible.
“He wasn’t a fan of me being here” so let’s pull him over 😂 what a loser
End qualified immunity or defund all this crap.
Reverse the patriot act
They are the terrorists.
The officer filed a false police report he’s fired but not charged! Wonder what community he’s coming to next? instead of taking their certification and charging like any other citizen. Just appalling!
Those officers are from my city, I remember hearing about this story a while back. But now it’s back and wow it blow up
I particularly appreciate this one as I live in Missouri, and I have been aware of the wording of the resisting arrest statute to include that it is no defense that an arrest is unlawful. I wasn’t aware of the Eastern District ruling though. Very informative, as always!!
And I do think that the LT might get a B or B+ in that his actions said more than the words that were most likely scripted by the legal department. Going against that script could have risked his job, and I think it is good to keep an officer like that on the force, especially in a leadership position.
Better Call Saul.
Cooperate, say absolutely nothing, lawyer up, and SUE.
I cannot fully express my gratitude for channels like this. Finally, law enforcement is "beginning to " getting the message that American Citizens are sick and tired of their abuses to us AMERICAN CITIZENS, THANK YOU AUDITORS ACCROSS AMERICA FOR STANDING UP AS OUR FOREFATHERS DID.
Agree but dislike the term and function of "citizen. ". It was changed with the 14 amendment basically making us all slave employees of the corporation known as the United States of America. Slight changes in wording and capitalization have entirely changed the nature of our relationship and contract with our "country" and "government" which is no longer remotely what it originally was. Worth some research.....
State national/sovereign/natural person/secured party creditor, the real definitions of terms like person which now include corporations, the corporation made in your name via the birth certificate with which most people identify - there's a lot of BS out there but there's truth.
Learn how the birth certificate is actually a bank bond, collateral for the debt notes/fiat currency we exchange and call money and are enslaved to.
Yes…. True that, we have been lied about everything.
"I understand that you are an argumentative individual"... "I am not an argumentative individual"... lol proceeds to argue
This is a great channel. It’s a shame the private se tor has to be responsible for police accountability.
Lucky for Mr. Hall, there were no acorns that may have startled Ossifer Malta!
Whew! That was close!
Yeah, that'd just be... nuts.
I'll just show myself out.
😂😂 good one
i love how the cop knew a middle finger wouldn’t be enough so he casually threw in “threaten” because it’s the only way he could do a legit stop.
if the guy actually threatened the officer, he would never have let him drive off.
It's called SWATTING when done by a civilian.
@@xenaguy01Exactly. That is the very least the lying officer should have got
He also said 'try to get a stop on' as in... Follow them for a while until they break a traffic law so you can legally pull them over. They skipped that part too because they are morons and couldn't even do be corrupt well.
"Try and think of an infraction to stop this guy and ruin his day for me woulda ya? Thanks good ol boy."
I hope whoever makes these videos is a judge or a lawyer... these videos are great and you could do a lot of good
Dude said "you're an argumentative individual" dude knew his rights you mean lmao
“I hope we can all put this behind us now.”
-$100,000
"You're an argumentative individual"
"No I'm not"
😂😂😂 Comedy gold 😂😂😂
“Nuh-uh!”
“Yeah-huh!”
There is no good response. If you agree, you're an argumentative person. If you deny it, you prove you're an argumentative person.
So true!
Found the bootlicker
"That's your opinion" @88mphDrBrown