Can Amber Heard Appeal the Verdict? Will She Win on Appeal? Criminal Lawyer Breaks it Down
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июн 2022
- Criminal Lawyer Bruce Rivers Breaks Down Amber Heards Shot at Appealing the Verdict for Johnny Depp
Stop Self Snitchin' Hat:
clr-bruce-rivers.myshopify.co...
Patreon:
patreon.com/Criminallawyerreacts
Producer: Michael Rivers
Instagram: @Michaelhrivers
Instagram: @CLRBruceRivers
Twitter: @BruceRiversCLR
Intro Song by Jaylap from CRAM
CRAM Soundcloud: soundcloud.com/xxcramxx
Instagram: @jaylapp
You can find Bruce Rivers on Facebook here:
RiversLawOffice/
Business Inquiries: Criminallawyerreacts@gmail.com
Rivers Law Firm, P.A., www.riverslawyers.com
![BETA SQUAD vs AMP FOOTBALL MATCH [OFFICIAL STREAM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ChEmvP52p0U/mqdefault.jpg)
She DID let all of those women down, by falsely accusing someone of physical and sexual abuse.
But we ALL know , and HE especially knows , it wasn’t a false accusation . She had abundant evidence , & even if she had been murdered by him his knuckle dragging fans would still blame her for “making him do it “ . A total circus and complete travesty of justice . A Phyrric victory for a vindictive, vengeful, hollow little man . He will never find peace
the thing is if she's appealing b'coz her evidences were suppressed, then they should let her appeal so we can also hear the audios from Johnny's side which were suppressed too including the one that she admitted to throw a bottle and severe his finger. she's literally just causing herself more problems.
Amber Turd only let down fakers like herself.
Her own evidence showed she is a manipulator and a liar. Tipping off TMZ to her divorce filing and lying about it. Recording her husband banging some cabinets than a few hours later the recording ends up on TMZ with ownership of copyright and claiming she has no idea how it got released. These actions alone doesn’t scream a victim of constant abuse afraid of her abuser.
wht annoyed me most was the emphasis on women as if to say that men cant be victims of abuse. we women are not always truthful as was clearly proven by the case.
As a UK resident, I am appalled at the " bias" , in my opinion, the judge showed. I have signed a petition to have the UK trial investigated.
👍signed it today .
Where can i sign it?
I agree
I did as well.
@@sanjuro1180 blackbelt barrister (not confuse with barrista) started it and has it on his videos (check description iirc)
It occurred to me also that Elaine is actively defaming JD. She is platforming a false narrative directly after it was completely rejected.
Doesn't matter. The social media she is trying to convince of her lies isn't about to change their verdict. She's a psychotic narcissist who likely had total elimination of Johnny on her mind. Gift him a big knife and then use it against him claiming she wrestled it from his grasp....... You can fill in the blank.
I think after the trial, it doesn't matter what she says, because Elaine looked so incompetent that I was almost embarrassed for her.
This is really funny, because I’m almost a year in the future and the way that the appeal worked for each side is that Depp’s team essentially got the publicity win while Heard’s team had the entire award they owed forfeited and retained her ability to tell her side of things without future defamation claims.
Keep in mind that one of the actual *jurors* said in an interview that “Truthfully, we think they both abused each other.”
So, Bredehoft definitely was never vulnerable to this claim… Even if she completely flopped during most crucial moments of testimony.
“It wouldn’t be smart to appeal.” That’s how you know she’ll do it. Never underestimate the imagination of the desperate and the shameless!
She doesn't have the doe.
I’d like to believe that but, stupidity, like life, finds a way!
Just saying if a simp ponies up the dough (lotta simps out there -all over the world!) she’ll be back in court so fast she gonna have court-burn!
My husband is a former prosecutor. He was appalled that her lawyer went on public television.
I watched the trial on "That Umbrella Guy". RUclips.He made some very good points during the whole trial.Her Lawyers we're even trying to get him shut down.😂😂😂
I'm a nurse and I'm appalled too. I don't know much about laws that govern this but, I know a liar and sore loser when I see them.
She's just as demented as her client. I wouldn't be very surprise if Elaine and AH made a team to appeal, even if it wasn't in their best interest. They don't seem very capable of using REASON imo
Usually accusing someone of their intentions behind their actions (15 minutes of Fame), means the person accusing is the person guilty... Elaine just can't let go of her small fame.
Dr. Hughes has a history of being on TV, and she wanted to reclaim her 15 minutes of fame.
Dr. Spiegel sought his 15 minutes in a very negative way...
Elaine just can't let go of it.
@@gawarlock4148 well elaines performance in that trial left a lot to be desired. I believe amber team of lawyers severely under performed. Amber overplayed her hand in every way.
"Is she going to appeal? Yes, absolutely." Will she lose the appeal? Yes, absolutely.
🙏😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🎃🎃🎃🎃
She can't appeal. She doesn't have the money
I remember that too lol. Her lawyers aren't in the business of giving good counsel. They are in the business of keeping her as a paying client. They'd love her to appeal.
I thought she didn't have any money, thought she wanted to be left alone and move on with her daughter. She can't look forward. A pure narcissist. This poor man Johnny Depp. He needs to be as far from her as possible. I fear for his life at this point. She is sick.
Omg hope so 🙏
Amber Heard: “I just want to move on with my life!”
Also Amber Heard: “I WANT AN APPEAL!”
IN MY VIEW
I was was shocked seeing Elaine Bredehoft appear on talk shows. I honestly expected her to go into damage control to save her career. Distancing herself from Amber Heard should have been number one on her list. Number two should have been: How can I gain trust as a credible competent attorney that someone would hire after defending Amber Heard.
I love how she apologized to women specifically and not just victims of abuse in general. Really shows she's more about men vs women as opposed to victim vs abuser.
Makes me think that’s why they liked Dr Hughes ☠️☠️
@@thegirlwiththatface yeah, Mrs. "i am just calling all abusers he and all victims she, I am totally not biased or overtly sexist"
Right!
Don’t believe she said that about women that’s bs from Elaine and made me cringe as a woman!
I don't believe she ever said that... She is a narcissist, she is only concerned with her self... 😂🤣 Ya know ?
She’s infuriating! She WAS taken seriously for half a decade! She was taken so seriously, in fact, to the extent someone else’s life was destroyed! The only reason she isn’t taken seriously now is bc she proved herself a liar! Take several seats, Amber and Elaine!
❤️❤️❤️And take them from the nosebleed seats!!
@@PlantTrees The hell is a nosebleed seat.
@@SCARRIOR the nosebleed section (which is what I’m assuming they’re referring to) is the farthest you can get from a stage at a performance. They’re meant to be bad seats.
And some people still believe her.
@@SCARRIOR the seats furthest away from the stage, usually highest in the risers. High elevation can give you nosebleeds, hence, the nosebleed seats.
The instant I heard Elaine had canceled the interview with Court TV I suspected somebody from Depp's team had...shall we say...gotten in touch with her? Even I, a total non-lawyer immediately thought, "What the hell are you doing?!?" when I saw those interviews. Also, seems to me AH's statement post-trial is STILL defaming JD. She needs to shut up, too! Love your videos!
Depps team wouldn't have gotten in touch with her, never. She probably just saw all the backlash on social media
@@alabamatrixie7379 You may well be correct but I'm thinking "someone" sent her the message she's treading on dangerous grounds legally...calling out the jury, the judge, bringing in the UK trial. Whatever or whoever - she needs to shut up. She lost.
@@susanb.3363 Definitely! She's an absolute clown!
Heard’s post trial statement was actually even more defamatory than the op-ed she was sued over.
If she does the interview next week, I bet it is a wayyy different interview than the 2 before...she may be being warned about defamation
I love how straight to the point you are with your language Bruce. Thanks for being so entertaining and informative.
Could not have said it better, thank you.
It's so absurd that Elaine claims they lost because of Johnny Depp's celebrity status. She just spent 6 weeks saying that Amber deserves $100 million because she was so set in Hollywood and her career was skyrocketing. Which is it, Elaine? You can't have it both ways.
Either she is also a celebrity who's career was worth MORE than Johnny Depp's, or you lost the case because of JD's celebrity status, and every claim that was made in court about Amber's booming career and huge damages was BS.
She's so contradictory...just like Turd when telling Johnny that he's a fat old man and why would Dior want him?..yet in court she said he's a very powerful man..
It's the chameleon approach to legal defense - whatever sways the jury (or afterwards, the public), that's what they are.
@@ChaCha-lt8rx Cha Cha Cha! 👍👍
@@ChaCha-lt8rx yeah, I found that interesting. i think Amber felt above him in some way? She's got to be kidding. My theory is Johnnie has ususally been involved with positive women. He didn't recognize evil when he saw it. He gets it now, but it was late in life. She couldn't have loved him very much to say the things she said about his career and his looks. Calling a man you love a fat old man? Why would Dior want him? I don;t remember the women who were with serious Domestic abusers feeling comfortable verbally abusing their husbands in that way. The problem is Johnny should of left her long time before he married her. She doesn't love anyone but herself. BTW, it is interesting that DIOR stuck with Johnny Depp throughout his troubles.
I have signed the petition to reopen the UK case.
Honestly that lawyer should be able to get sued for defamation they lost and she's still saying Johnny was the only one that committed domestic violence.
And if Amber is a liar. Her after my I s trash she comes a cross bitter
It may happen If Elaine continues this , she might get herself a defamation case
Yeah especially after what they accused Mr Waldman of defamation
@@Melissa_Badhorse good point!!
@@Melissa_Badhorse Waldman's claim was true, but jury didn't believe it .
It is truly refreshing to learn the law through a delightful medley of uncensored expletives ❤ ahhhh you had me at “Elaine needs to shut the fuck up!” 😂
She's trying to pray on all the people that didn't watch the trial. Unfortunately for her everyone has been talking about this trial, there are plenty of RUclipsrs who covered the trial including has been asmondgold TV got me and my mom watched.
Shortly after I shared the first video with my mother, it became a thing for us to watch each video uploaded every day about the trail.
prey
It drives me crazy when amber and her attorney keep saying "she" won the UK case!!! Johnny didn't sue her, he sued the Sun magazine or whatever it's called. So annoying!
Yeah he sued them and they said they believed it to be true when they printed it
Michele Fizer - ikr?! She can’t ‘win’ a case she was not a party to! She was a witness for the defendants, News Group Newspapers, publisher of The Sun. This is another LIE
As a survivor, getting our stories out is VERY important. I am damn glad the trial was televised. The general public needed to see the lengths an abuser will go to in order to maintain control. We see our abusers in Amber Heard. Johnny Depp winning felt like we were seen, and our stories were heard. Amber using our experiences for her own personal gain will not be forgotten any time soon. She's a horrible, despicable human being. I cried with relief as the verdict was read. #truthwins
@Ashley I totally agree with you, it's not a matter of gender. A lot of female DV survivors empathised with Johnny Depp and saw their abuser in Amber Heard.
I am super happy with the verdict, but IT'S TRUE that from now on, male abusers will play the Amber card to mute their partners.
I feel the same. Im so happy it was televised as it was crucial for the world to see.
As a mother of a sweet, kind and generous son… my worry is he will end up with a woman like Amber and no one will believe him! Televising this trial has highlighted that men can be the victims too and their abusers will go to great lengths to use whatever disgusting powers to continue that abuse!
Well said!! Continue to post your truth. It matches so many others.
Exactly I couldn't have said it better myself
Possible retrial ?! Imagine what the jury would think of her a second time round 😳
Try finding a jury who's not aware if this case at all 🤦♀️
She’d be a completely different “character”🙄
More staring
I do find it hard to believe you could find anyone to make up an impartial jury.
Thank you for all these clarifications!
I am not from the US, and I was absolutely dumbfounded when I saw this interwiew. That she, as the lawyer of Amber Heard, was allowed to sit and slander Depp like this? I mean, there was a verdict! By all means, give a short statment that you are disapointed and that you will make an appeal, but the rest…!
I thought it to be highly unethical, and was kind of relieved to hear you going in the same direction in the video.
One important point in the UK trial, which Elaine seems to "conveniently" forget, is that since Amber wasn't a party to the case, she didn't have to go through discovery (or disclosure as they call it in the UK). Johnny's team asked the judge for a motion to force her into discovery, but the motion was rejected. So, in point of fact, MORE evidence was presented in the US trial since Amber actually had to go through discovery. The Sun had to go through discovery but they didn't have much on Amber, to begin with.
Furthermore, the judge of the UK trial, in his ruling (which is 130+ pages long) discounted all audio files presented because (and I'm paraphrasing here) "they were not sworn statements in court and their validity was suspect". So, all the audio recordings? He threw them all out. He also discounted testimonies by people Amber paid to lie in official papers (mostly related to the Australian dog smuggling case) since they had lied on official papers, ignoring the fact that they had provided payment receipts showing Amber PAYING them to falsify official documents. So, the judge believed people saying Amber told them to falsify official documents weren't reliable since they had falsified documents but that Amber was reliable despite the fact that there was evidence SHE had asked them to falsify the documents.
All in All, the UK case was the result of an old judge (maybe, probably, with conflict of interest), deciding to believe Amber over everyone else while also preventing Amber from having to disclose evidence.
thanks, bro! it makes more sense to me now what happened there.
I watched a lawyer/barrister from the UK talk about the UK ruling, and he was fairly shocked by the judge throwing out the audio recordings. He also said that getting an appeal in the UK is very difficult.
Seriously, that judge should have excused himself because his own son worked for the company that owns the sun.
in the UK there wasn't a jury.
Well put
@@heidifruchtl354 …and judge Nichol had previous done legal work for Murdoch. His ex wife had a tea party w Amber days before. TUG had about 7 links the judge had to Amber and various legal reasons he should have withdrawn himself from the case
The biggest insult of all this is she keeps referring to “all women” and herself as a symbol of DV victims and “women”. Every woman I’ve met in real life- not online bots or the very small, blind, gullible minority- thinks she is grotesque. The charade is a damn insult to people’s intelligence at this point. Almost unbearable to listen to.
Speaking ‘as a woman’, I would’ve wanted her thrown in jail. She got off far too lightly from this. This must honestly repulse women who’ve been victims of domestic violence, absolutely flaunting her abuse of the justice system at their expense.
I absolutely agree. It’s an insult and all those lies should have been somehow punished.
She definitely not speaking on my behalf
Absolutely. She keeps claiming to "speak" and represent all DV victims and women. I'm both and #youdon'tspeakformeAmber I wish there was an opt out option when she makes these statements.
Every woman I know who has been following the trial at all is infuriated at her. ESPECIALLY the women who have been the victim of domestic abuse. The few women who actually support her are perfect examples of toxic femininity. I thought toxic femininity was a myth but after 2 men I personally know had their lives ruined by false accusations and AH almost ruining Johnny Depp, it is as real as toxic masculinity. My dad used to beat my mom and I was being triggered left and right BY HER. I WISH AH would face charges.
Agree!!!
I'm curious whether Elaine Bredehoft would be able to even do law anymore. She lost all her credibility by being on the news. Unlike Benjamin Rottenborn his name might be forgotten over time and he can do law again. The only thing he had lost is his competence as a lawyer. Elaine lost more by 1 being a sore loser, 2 her Karen speech, 3 being a broken recorder, 4 being an incompetent lawyer, 5 loss of credibility. There might be more but that is what I can see.
Rottenborn the expressionless granite man was only there for a payday I think he saw how this was going to end and thought fuk my share of the fee is to small for this sht.
@@laurencekelly5081 But, unlike Bredehoft, he hasn't disgraced himself with post-trial conduct. In the courtroom, he represented his client as well as he could. He comes out of this just fine.,
Also Elaine could never find the mic button, talk about wasting time! Lol
ELAINE IS A TOTAL LIAR AND DISHONEST LAWYER , ENTIRELY WITHOUT CREDIBILITY! Hopefully she never practices again! She wad also paid off to lie in the U.K. TRIAL!
@@christinelloyd8775 That would be rather unlikely since she didn't speak in the UK trial and was present only as an observer and to advise Amber Heard about her testimony.
If she really had, u know: a conscience; I feel like she'd understand the only set back for woman is her setting this weird standard that someone would just keep lying and lying and have her lawyer keep lying and lying and never admit defeat. This was her mountain of evidence: "im not saying everyones lying about me... I'm just saying they don't know". If she really cared for other women than herself, even in the slightest, she'd see she's only making things worse for them... but na everyone's lying and you guys are just misogynistic
I find it hard to believe that the first words she said after the announcement of the verdict was “I feel so bad for all those women…”. She’s a narcissist; she wouldn’t say that. Now, a lie from her lawyer.
Agree completely! Her first words are probably unprintable.
If she felt so for all those women, she wouldn't have lied trying to trash her ex. She only made "those women" worse off. She DID let down those women.
first words she said is 99.9% something awful about Johnny, then she stormed out of court and probably broke half the things in her house in a rage that day. All these fancy quotes were prepared beforehand
Yeah, I didn't think she said that either. Her lawyers would have remained silent for a few minutes in complete dismay if she said that. I believe she yelled at them when she got back together with them. Blame herself? No way.
Her first word were to her lawyers saying "how did you clowns manage to lose a defamation case?!?!"
Elaine: accuses witnesses of testifying just for their "15 minutes of fame"
Also elaine: goes on every TV show that'll have her
Good point
Lol true
Elaine really needs a rest
She needs to be held accountable for all the harm and lies she has done in 6 years! She lied under oath also!!
spot on as always bruce. love your commentary. brilliant as usual. cant wait for your next video.
Question: Are we just going to forget the fact that this girl literally said with a straight face that two photos which are OBVIOUSLY the same fkin picture, was taken at two different times. Isn't that the best case for perjury + fabricating evidence?
On cross of the tech. " expert " he stated two pictures were they same and not altered. That just because the picture was in photoshop does mean it was altered. But the 2 pics were different colors so clearly one was the original and the other an altered copy. The pictures were taken the same time down to the second. All of Amber's witnesses perjured themselves. It was shocking to see "expert" witnesses openly and obviously lying. So these people just go from trial to trial and lie for whomever pays them?
I couldn't believe she was saying that pictures were different, and that one she was walking and laughing she was wearing make up, I was like: what? Does this girl think we have no brain?
@@emvitt have you seen how many feminists in the media are supporting her? Clearly many don't have brains
@@michaelwaninger3155 i think OP is talking about the wine photos. the two bruise photos werent suggested to be from two separate instances from what I remember but I could be wrong. Kind of says a lot that we’re even getting confused about WHICH doctored and duplicated photos we’re talking about though
@@MrJoosebawkz she stated that one picture was taken without the light on and that the other photo was taken with the light on. So she was saying they were two different pictures.
Really like your take on this one. Elaine doing multiple interviews using the same lines seems really unprofessional. She takes no responsibility for the loss, and keeps claiming "mountains" of evidence was left out. I like how she also keeps mentioning the UK trial, but never tells anyone that in the UK trial Amber Heard wasn't a defendant. I think at this point Elaine cares more about fixing her tarnished image as an attorney than she does for her own client. "The first thing she told me is I'm so sorry for all these women", bullshit. That's such a PR line.
I've never seen a lawyer conduct themselves like this. I wonder what is fueling her behavior?
She wants her 15 mins of fame😂
Yes, I think she's trying to protect her image, too. IMO, she just sounds like a sore loser.
Absolutely agreed. like Johnny said, she is just mounting mounting more and more 💩! Now Elaine is doing the same with Amber Heard the turd.
It seems like they are digging a deeper hole.
If there's anything positive about this, Elaine's bullshit interviews shine light to shady dealings in the UK case, and now an UK barrister (Black Belt Barrister on YT) is opening a petition to reopen the case for appeal, possibly changing the verdict in JD's favor.
Bruce Rivers I love your channel! I love to hear your analysis of court room trials and behaviors of both defendant and prosecution. Thank you and your son for providing us with excellent content! Also, thanks for calling me back last week to say hello. I’m a huge fan. Sending you my very best from Pennsylvania USA
Thank you for your blunt honesty. I feel exactly the same I ever heard as you do.
Elaine was dreadful- especially on her runaway train delivery of the closing argument. Amber was completely unsympathetic because she was clearly lying, exaggerating and was snarky and insolent on the stand.
The only messages this trail sends is that men can be victims too ( something I know well from almost 30 yrs working in DV!) and that women who lie won’t automatically be believed- nor should they!
Elaine has a bright future ahead of her either working for CNN or the Democratic Committee.
Here’s the thing tho..it’s the women who are married to men like Amber who are the ones that aren’t believed, the ones the police send away when reporting threats made against them/ stalking behaviour and are told to come back they do actually do something, and then they do something alright and the police are investigating a homicide. The point to be made here is that Amber’s personality type is genderless and it’s the victims of these very clever, very manipulative, very dishonest, very charismatic when they want to be people who really struggle to be believed and find closure. I think I would be fair in saying that getting away from them and having nothing more to do with them, ever, is a pretty good indicator of who is the aggressor and who just wants a peaceful life.
@@PhantomFilmAustralia We all know, you mean Fox and the GOP. ;-)
@@PhantomFilmAustralia how is she politically aligned? Why are you making this political? Insane
@@lucilleie No. It's insane you are the one who couldn't recognize the joke. Others had no problem.
I am SO sick of the mainstream media spinning this in Amber's favor. Are they really that desperate for views that they blatantly lie & spin tails? Stupid question- of course that's exactly what they do. Any ounce of pity I felt for Elaine during the trial went out the window after seeing her interview. She is as bad as Turd, & I hope her career is over, too. Just hearing her voice makes my blood boil..
Same. Like women or men can’t lie about abuse. Her lies have set back women. Shame on Elaine and shame on amber turd
Agreed. I felt bad for Elaine; I thought people were treating her like they did the OJ prosecutor… but now? After she goes ans makes statements for her??? I wonder if Amber threatened to beat her up lol.. why not Rottenborn? Needlehoff? Why Elaine? I bet the boys were like “uumm no. We hate her. We’re done”. Amber SHOULD be sorry to other women; now other women are going to be afraid to say anything-even more so- because of her lies.
Main media cares only about their agenda, not truth. Idk dude just ignore it, I hope everyone will ignore mainstream media so it'll die out quicker.
Main stream media has _always_ been this desperate for views and has always spun lies just like this (at least for the last couple decades).
What you should be asking is, "what _else_ are they lying about and misrepresenting?". The answer is _a lot._ On both "sides". All of the main stream media are only _media:_ They're entertainment corporations, not factual news outlets.
ya, I felt bad for her lawyers cuz they were just doing their job, but something about ELaine in those interviews, makes me lose any respect i had for her. they double down on the lies in court and are doubling down afterwards.
Really enjoyed every commentary on Depp trial Bruce Rivers CLR!…and catchy intro music!
I LOVE the way you explain and call out BS. So clear, precise and refreshing. Thank You Bruce!
Please start to call Amber an abuser because she IS the abuser! She's trying to turn the script in him. Smh! She's a proven liar and now she's trying to use real victims to gain sympathy! I hope Johnny collects every dime!
Watch the movie “Men don’t tell”. True story
“Elaine needs to take a little vacation and shut the f**k up!”, almost had me in the floor!😂😂😂 She needs to take her L and move along! I think she’s been very disrespectful to both the judge and jury with her comments! I’ve loved your coverage of this trial and the comment I mentioned above earned you a Sub lol!!💯😂
That’s what I said when I saw her doing an interview the very next day. Everyone concerned is full of stress hormones and exhausted. She’s in no condition to use good judgment. She should have been home eating, sleeping, and exercising.
I'm dying...she does need a vacation & a mega pint of STFU 🤣😎 🍷
Bruce, the way you keep it real is why I enjoy watching your videos so much.
Thank you for explaining this all to me! I look forward to all your videos about this!!
Like Camille said in cross examination, “You’re the one who can’t let go, right, Ms. Heard?”
Cluster B personalities cannot let go. They’re a nightmare in the Family Court System.
Narcissists will forever torture “the one who got away.”
Best thing is to lie low. Pretty soon they become embroiled in controversy with someone else and forget about you.
That's why I prefer Sadistic Psychopaths..
They let up once the last mound of dirt is in place
Ah is not a narcissist. She has what they call boarderline personality disorder. It shares a lot of behavior with NPD, but is not quite the same thing.
@@surferdude4487 BPD is Cluster B.. she also has been diagnosed as having Histrionic PD.. which is also Cluster B.. Considering she's been diagnosed with comorbid personality disorders within the same Cluster, its not a stretch (as was seen in her actions and testimony) to assume she has traits of NPD and maybe even full blown NPD..
@@surferdude4487 The Comoridity of someone with BPD with NPD is 40%.. so its 50/50 even without taking into account her actions and her diagnosis with HPD..
What Elaine and Amber fail to comprehend is that it was Amber being caught in lie after lie that caused her to lose. Elaine and team allowed the exact same photo to be entered into evidence as different photos a couple of times -in one instance, the same photo for incidents that occurred 6 months apart! Elaine also should have advised her client to stop making outrageous claims of horrific violence that would land anyone in the hospital - if not the morgue. A small bruise on a cheek is NOT how someone would look if they had been repeatedly punched in the face.
....with hands that had rings on every finger. AH's face would have been cut to ribbons. She is a psychopath who deservedly lost the case.
I've always thought if Amber's recount of the assault is not as over-the-top and shocking, which might be intended to get the jury's sympathy, it would have been more believable. "He pushed me, as he often does, made me fell and bruised my arms" versus "He punched me repeatedly on my face so much that I lost count" knowing she doesn't have an evidence to back that up, makes her case fell flat.
Possibly if she photographed more beatings and less lampshades. This was insulting to most people's intelligence. Vicki
Thank you 😊!
Johnny was lucky that Amber was too soy for smashing her own face and making photo of it and medical record. If she was brave enough this would have been much harder trial for him.
Thanks, Bruce! Love your insight.
This was awesome. Thank you
That judge was stellar. Really. Can’t see them having any grounds for any appeal. So ridiculous.
Yeah, just more hot air from Elaine Bratwurst and Amber Turd.
She was amazingly fair and impartial
The only thing I was shocked about was Elaine going on that show. I thought for sure after the trial that she was sick of amber and saw thru the lies.
The judge was one of the best judges that I have seen. She was honest, fair, and most definitely not biased.
She also had a huge patience with Elaine and Rottenborn
If the jury followed their instructions, and we have no reason to assume that they didn’t, the only person that brought social media into the courtroom was Team Amber. Their analysis of the hashtag movement exposed the jury to what was going on, not the other way around.
RIGHT? WTF WAS THAT. I'm amazed the judge allowed it. Utterly baffling
@@ToxicallyMasculinelol because one of Amber's team point which they won is the ex depp lawyer who put the case in social media about amber and friend who made a false 911 call
Very true.
@@ToxicallyMasculinelol should she have been not allowed on the stand as an unreliable witness like the other lady that admitted to checking social media during the trial
OOoh this is a good point and I wonder if it will hurt their attempts to paint the image that there was bias since THEY repeatedly brought it to everyone's attention. Good catch!
Thank you again for your stellar commentary!
Very well said!!! Love your style
I love how the AH team's approach is to blame JD's being "a powerful white man."
Virtually the entire world turned on JD, based merely on AH's words.
Yet when they had the chance to prove _one single act of sv/dv,_ AH team *COULD NOT DO IT.*
I'd like to see the interviewers state these facts directly to her lying, twisted face.
if AT was a man she would be facing prison time if you want to have a discussion about the power balance between the sexes.
Yes! I want to see the interviewers call her out on that, too!! Those powerful white men were not on the jury. They are not the ones who found her guilty with malice. In fact, it was the powerful men in Hollywood who protected AH and kicked JD to the curb. AH's team did not provide one shred of credible evidence to prove her accusations yet look at MSM claiming JD only won because of misogyny while ignoring the obvious misandry among society and women's rights activists. Somebody needs to call out MSM for ignoring the misandry in this nation.
true they only had to prove **just one proof of JD being abusive** and here we are
Why is everyone siding with JD, do they get paid from him?
@@dastanharris
Have you been living under a rock or something??
Amber is doing exactly what she was sued for, saying that people will lie and support Johnny no matter what because of the "Power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband".
She doesn't learn
she wants to take down the patriarchy at all cost
This ex husband who is so powerful he was forced to pull out of Fantastic Beasts & sacked from Pirates!!
@@sleepymurphy I said the same thing.. I did not see any POWER on J.D behalf!
And then her lawyer goes on tv broadcasting slander on Johnny depp??? She should get sued for defamation too
Bruce, I absolutely love you! Your analysis and some of the things you say are spot on and crack me up! Keep up the great job!
Love the channel Bruce!
How about the fact that the main witness that contradicted Amber's testimony was AMBER. She directly contradicted her own testimony at least a half dozen times.
The message that has been sent is: those who have been abused - can win. My grandmother was horrible to my grandfather. I'm a woman - and never so naive as to think women can't be abusers.
My Mum could be very nasty to my Dad sometimes, it used to really upset me with the nasty names she called him. He was very deaf as he had mastoids as a child and she'd call him "oi, deafy" when he couldn't hear her. She wasn't physically violent only using words. He worked long hours in a factory getting up at 5 a.m. and not coming home until sometimes at 10 p.m. doing overtime to buy Birthday and Christmas presents for myself and my sister and to pay the mortgage. He was a very kind Dad to both of us and would take us out shopping on a Saturday to get our comics and sweets so to hear my Mother abuse him was very upsetting. They both died over 20 yeas ago but the memories have stayed with me.
Thank you for the break down and love the way you just say it as it is. Very refreshing and logical - our word is all we have in the end.
Love your clear input!
Seeing Elaine run her mouth as if the verdict was some kind of evil conspiracy is par for this course. She was the only lawyer in court who was consistently defeated by her own microphone, whether on or off. I have trouble taking her seriously, and that's just been reinforced now that she's entered the talk show circuit for attention/money. Yikes.
Her future looks bleak to me, that's for sure
Well said!!
Shes getting her 15 minutes of fame🤣🤣
Microphone wins!...fatality..lol
shes after her 15 minutes of fame.
15:00 is the best part of the whole video… you couldn’t have said it any better Bruce 🤣
Yes indeed 🤣🤣
Definitely. 🤣🤣
I love this dude, he says stuff like it is.
Love it. Keep up the good work, Bruce. Love criminal lawyer style.
Yes Elaine take a vacation & stfu
Just love your reaction so much!!!
Bruce you always give cases and situations another dimension others didn’t pot the spot on I love that
Thank you
Except the fact that she tore Johnny's reputation to the ground. You can't claim that he won because of his celebrity anymore. He won because of truth and evidence. And I agree, her lawyer is doing nothing to help anyone. I'd be shocked if I saw her doing anymore interviews.
I tried so hard not to comment. I agree with most of what you said, but I have to disagree with you and @CLRBruceRivers in that I'm pretty certain she and her client will continue down this path. They've hopped on the bull and it's too late to back out. If they really plan to lodge an appeal, expect to see more media posts and appearances to try and get the public back on her side.
Oh Elaine.....seems you are the 15 minute famer now...lol..... give it up lady!!! You are as bad as she is ...maybe y'all can support each other....you can Iive with her and find out what she will accuse you of next....
shes looking for her 15 minutes of fame... ironic
@@Aleyi7 well, to Bruce’s point, where is the money for the bond coming from to file an appeal?
@@Aleyi7 Well Elaine did already cancel one of her planned media appearances that I know of at least, and doesn't seem to have any more planned appearances for the future anymore either. Remember that Heard has hired a PR firm to manage the optics of her case - they're likely telling them these media appearances are doing more harm than good and to stop doing them. I suspect this appeal will never actually happen - if she appeals she has to put the ~$8 on the table ready to be claimed by Depp should her appeal fail like it almost certainly would. I suspect Heard would much rather not appeal it at all and simply say she is going to and then hope everybody forgets about it, while she tries to hide her money all over town and gives expensive "gifts" to friends and family and stuff.
I’m so tired of discussing this.
THE LAW IN VIRGINIA IS TO APPEAL SHE WOULD HAVE TO PAY EVERY CENT OF WHAT THE JURY GAVE HER TO PAY BEFORE SHE COULD START THE APPEAL PROCESS…
SHE WILL NEVER APPEAL.🤷🏻
She would need a miracle and rich person (like Elon Musk ) to pay it for her. Elon has his own problems right now 😃
@@dawnbell6137 Elon broke off with her, altho her baby maybe Elon's. Coz I know they made embryos and amber's baby was a surrogate, soo it all point towards Elon(google if u doubt it, i m lazy to cite the sources)... but even if elon gives the money she needs to show the source or IRS gonna get her ass
@@dawnbell6137 Musky has high probability of paying. He loves surprises.
I totally agree, she is trying to pick up her face from under an 18 wheeler .
@@dawnbell6137 elongated mollusk
Love your work Bruce!
Can't stop watching your posts!
This wasn't a let down. This was for all those victims who have been gaslighted and stigmatized as the perpetrator. Men and women can be victims. They start to question their own sanity and memories. As a survivor of DV and SA this was a win in my book. I immediately knew watching her testify.
But non of the media except Fox recognizes male victims. All the rest of the media covers for women liars. And will never admit men can be victims. Look how the media now claims Johnny is abusing Amber by defending himself. Not just her but he's abusing all women by defending himself. This is how horrible the media has become they literally demonize a man for defending himself.
what's so terrible is that we're now watching gaslighting on a global level by the media. It's actually insane how almost every single publication is trying to spin this as "disregard all evidence and facts, justice and truth don't matter, what the jury thought doesn't matter, the fact that Heard's story was blatant lies full of holes doesn't matter, blaming an innocent (male) abuser victim doesn't matter, only what's perceived as good for women's movements matter, so Heard must be right."
@@CosmicAeon The only thing this trial has taught me to disregard is MSM. I didn't follow the UK trial at all and I find it irrelevant since it wasn't actually against her but a newspaper.
Can Elaine be held liable for accusing even insinuating that the jury went on social media which is prohibited? If not she should be. She is so pathetic. What an excuse for a lawyer.
She should be disbarred.
SHE’S SO DISGUSTING!!! 🤮
and the bit where Elaine said in a interview afterwards this is a set back for woman everywhere, ( heard was found to have lied ) the only set back is for here and her terrible firm..
and her BIG MOUTH
@@allanchurm Elaine just wasn't up to the job if I had an ongoing case with Elaine I would cut my losses and switch to JD's firm of lawyers. Plus the guy on the other side of Amber looked like a lump of granite no expression just i'm only here to fill a chair and get a load of money.
@@laurencekelly5081 And to object against something HIS witness, that HE was cross-examining, said - that cracked a lot of people up!
The video intro always gets me, lolll Love it! Great content, thank you for sharing your knowledge and expertise!
This is a very well-done summary, and an excellent tie!
Most insurance companies don't pay if the client was found to have done malice as a verdict. The vice president of the insurance company was smiling and happy if you look at her. The cap is what the policy holder paid for.
Travelers quote "Intentional acts. A personal umbrella policy isn’t designed to protect you from liability connected with your own intentionally harmful behavior; for example, if you intentionally harm a visitor to your home."
Yes she was smiling a lot when Camille was doing the cross examination.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. She was smiling at Camille, she felt impressed by camille.
How is she allowed to continue arguing that it is the same case as in the UK when
it clearly wasn’t?
Love your Channel.
Yes! ...I agree with all your points.
You really help those of us who are trying to better understand the legal process.
Thank you for the video
I saw someone noted this, so I'm gonna repeat it as well in simple way;
1- She cannot sue Johnny for the same lawsuit (defamation case) in any state of US.
2- If she wants to appeal the case, by the Virginia law, she must pay the $8.350.000 to Johnny first then do the appeal process which as Elaine said, she cannot pay the money, because she's broke as f.
Pretty sure She has to pay the full amount as does JD to the court. There will be an appeal or they will cut a deal to pay less money.
Not necessarily pay, but post a bond (prove the ability to pay or get a bank willing to issue a letter saying they will back the amount in the amount of $8.35 mil + attorney fees.)
"she must pay the $8.350.000 to Johnny first" Damn yup if that is the case. She will never be able to appeal.
I think the money needs to be put in a bond
@@dianad3080 I don't think any bank would be sane enough to cover her ass, she's not reliable...
No one is gonna gamble their assets for someone who uses pledge and donation as a same xD
This is not a sad day for women of abuse. She's trying to save her rep.
If a woman goes through the beatings AH accused Johnny of and was raped by using a broken bottle she's going to be in the hospital - so there's her evidence, clear cut.
A regular victim of abuse actually just wants to get as far away from their abuser as possible. They don't even want to go to court, they just want to move to a safe place and start healing.
Exactly!. Her bread and butter is being a fake victim. She's the abuser and the world knows the truth now.
Exactly 👍👍
💯 agree with you I can't believe she would get on live TV and tell everyone one about the whole bottle thing and not go to the hospital I really don't understand that part
Women who have suffered DV and SV most likely want Amber to shut up. She made it harder for them every time she opened her mouth on the stand.
@@carolynreebel1698 because never happened and if that happen she will need medical attention for sure
Lmao…. I absolutely love you Bruce!! You’re so real, raw, intelligent, funny, and coherent. Anyone would be a fool to not follow you or hire you. You’re just great all around. 💛💫😌☝🏽
Another fabulous breakdown. Well done Mr Rivers!
The real impact of being live online was that people from outside the trial decided to intervene in the moment, demolishing some of the AH team's defence strategies: the cosmetics company, the former TMZ employee, the psychiatrist who disavowed the expert... This is why Elaine was so angry with the witnesses who came forward during the trial, they unmasked everything they had prepared.
Yes, and the lovely Kate Moss obliterated her lies!
And the trailer park manager. He even said he had to leave because Amber's behavior reminded him of an abusive relationship he went through.
I already believed JD by the rebuttal case but those witnesses destroyed what little doubt I had left. That was insane. The jury HAD to find in his favor at that point. Making this trial nationally televised was an incredible decision.
AH is still on her mission to destroy JD at all costs, even to her own detriment. This is what a narcissist does when they can no longer humiliate and abuse the person they are fixated on, who gets out from under their control. Photo shopped pictures from her phone, no medical records to back up any injuries, independent people, even cops, not seeing any bruising, non-photo shopped pictures showing her a day or two after the supposed incidents, with no bruising or swelling at all, and edited recordings she did as a setup, are not a mountain of evidence!
I also doubt that her homeowner's liability insurance is going to cover her defense costs, as most policies have an exclusion if it's determined the insured is found to be at fault. The fact that the jury found her actions were done with malice should give the insurance company the ability to deny her claim, which means she'll owe much more than just what she'll been ordered to pay JD.
To a narcissist, losing is actually like throwing down a gauntlet and spurs them on to attain their ultimate goal, which is complete annihilation of the "offending" person. They don't get over it, their hatred just grows. Good thing JD has bodyguards, as I would put nothing past her. The father of that baby needs to step up and go for custody, as that poor child is in for a terrible life with this woman.
Yep,no more supply.
She should just take a leaf out of Megan Markles book with her disastrous UK appearances and see how she has fared and get out while the going is good.
If Australia comes after her for severing Johnnys finger (called glassing there) she could get 27 years. There's no statue of limitations for a crime of that nature. That would protect the baby.
@@kfitz192 not to mention smuggling the dogs in
I totally agree with everything you said. Your 3 paragraph reminds me of what Dr. Curry said and what we heard in the audio tapes. Amber stated that when JD tried to leave the fight by (running away to one of his 15 houses or being a coward) that it would make her more upset and it would fester in her and she would become an animal because she wasn't able to finish the fight! That is what they do! I agree that Mollusk (JDs name for Musk) or whoever the baby daddy is should get custody but after what she did to JD, what do you think she'd do the someone who tried to take away her baby? I wouldn't be surprised if she bribes Elon into paying all her lawyers fees.
I appreciate your very authentic and intelligent commentary.
Love Ya Bruce...thanks again or your insights!
Since she’s still publicly claiming Johnny is an abuser, can she be sued again?
Yes she can and I hope she is, her attorney can be as well. They have left themselves wide open.
@@haveasunnyday4256 Can’t claim much in compensatory damages at this point. Maybe find a state with a higher limit for punitive damages…
💯 yes
I doubt he would want to go through this again, though.
That would be so funny man
The Judge threw out Amber's arrest record on DV charges, to avoid prejudice by the Jury.
This would have been more damning than anything AH has. They are such sore and undignified losers.
Great video thanks.
Very insightful video.
Initially I thought Elaine had a hard client to work with, and everyone needs to be represented fairly in court so feel sorry for her to have a hard job to do.... Now, I'm just having 2nd hand embarrassment from watching her interviews. It is not a positive light on her professional image.
I don't think she actually listened to her lawyers because she thinks she's smarter than everyone else.
@@Skyte100 I agree. That's why it's even harder for me to comprehend Elaine's choice of action. She already got her 15 min of fame (maybe a negative way)!? Does she really think the interviews are going to save her image? that professional judgement is very questionable.
Elaine didn't look good in court proceedings and had an embarrassing interview, she won't be getting any new high profile clients. 🙄 Now Ben on other hand, is looking real good 👍 .
I get the feeling she's trying to raise money with the interviews in order to cover her expenses. There's no way Heard is giving her a dime with the amount of new debt she now has.
Elaine is more cringe than fact based.
"so much evidence was suppressed" meanwhile, in amber's statement after losing, she says "despite the mountain of evidence..."
Good catch!
Another contradiction is now between her and her lawyer 🤦♀️. They really cannot get their story straight.
Good point!!
She's talking out of both sides of her mouth.
Elaine’s just going bonkers over this… Bruce is right, she’s seriously in need of a holiday, vacation or vacances… cheers from France 😉
You're one good lawyer and you have good insight and I like your show your commentary everything is so professional and you're right on
I’ve been waiting for this.
I love how they tend to forget that she was believed for 6 years, everyone took her word and its why he lost jobs. Idk why they keep saying its a setback to all woman bc they wont be believed when she was believed.
so true, and dont you see, even now mainstream media support and defame Johnny even though he has proven himself innocent of any kind of abuse!
Exactly this.
I did not believe her from the beginning. That extortion letter said it all.
🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽 THANKYOU! As a victim myself, I cannot believe someone would lie under oath and make a mockery of us true victims. Nobody is falling for her lies, even the jury saw through it! Well said!!
Thanks for the great explanation you are awesome 😎
Right on, as always!
At the end of the trial I kinda felt bad for Elaine for taking a case with a liar and a fake but after she started saying this crap at these interviews I take it all back. Elaine is just like Amber that can't speak the truth and take accountability. It's all everyone else's fault but theirs.
I assume her press run is to save her reputation. She lost a very high profile case and still has a career and potential clients to find. I think she’s doing damage control. From what I saw Amber didn’t take a lot of the advice her lawyers gave her
Edit: not saying I like her just playing devils advocate
I had heard that she also was a lawyer for Amber at the U.K. trial before the U.S. trial ended, so I completely lost any and all empathy I had for her. She knew what she was getting into. Then coming out on television giving her piece, essentially doubling down and blaming everyone but herself, really boils the blood further.
For someone who accused others of getting there 15 minutes of fame she sure as hell milking hers
@@siege824s8 point well made, excellente’!!
I believe this is Elaine's way of trying to recover her losses and reputation. She is not doing this in the best interests of her client. If she continues to appear on these news channels, she is putting herself in a position of being liable for defamation herself.
Sure as shit isn't a good look for her. The only way she could have recovered her reputation is to walk away and cop the L. Lawyers have to do a good job regardless of whether they think their client is innocent. They don't have to double down and keep fighting for them after they lose spectacularly.
The fact that she thinks she's helping her reputation just shows she's out of touch and is the last person I'd want representing me in legal matters.
Definitely, but I also think there's a 0% chance that Depp would actually file suit against her since he already got what he wanted from the trial.
Johnny should sue Elaine for defamation 😂
Thank you Bruce! You’re awesome!
Thank You Mr.Bruce Rivers for the Perfection
Breakdown as Always!
Amber Heard's team is the one that opened the door to potentially influencing the jury by brining in a social media expert to demonstrate what the general public is saying on social media about her. What's their appeal to the court? "You're honor, because of our ineptitude of our expert and team, we accidentally influenced the jury on purpose..."
I've been saying that from the start!
Funny thing is, all accusations made by this awful team are in fact things AH did. It was INSANE when they were talking about DV symptoms and gaslighting tactics of abusers. It played to the hands of JD site. I'm sure the Jury was confused or even sometimes disgust about that victim/abuser turnaround. The same when they humiliated JD with photos from him unconscious. How should that convince the jury that she was a victim???
Excellent
but lets not forget if they never used that expert. JD's team would have been able to say amber turd in court over and over
Dunces...😂😂😂
The UK case was Johnny sueing the Sun, not Amber! I'm surprised that Elaine is twisting the narrative. Can she get into trouble for that?
Blaming Judge and Jury just boggles my mind.
You are incredible sir, awesome videos
Loved the outro blicky B!!